• 検索結果がありません。

Econometrics I: Solutions of Homework #9

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Econometrics I: Solutions of Homework #9"

Copied!
4
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Econometrics I: Solutions of Homework #9

Hiroki Kato * June 14, 2020

Contents

1 Solutions 1

1.1 (1) . . . . 1

1.2 (2) . . . . 2

1.3 (3) . . . . 2

1.4 (4) . . . . 3

1.5 (5) . . . . 4

1 Solutions

1.1 (1)

Using the matrix of eigenvectors of Ω (denoted by A) and the diagonal matrix Λ whose elements are eigenvalues λ

i

, the matrix Ω can be diagonalized as follows:

A

ΩA = Λ,

that is,

Ω = AΛA

(1)

*

e­mail:

[email protected]. Room 503. If you find any errors in handouts and materials,

please contact me via e­mail.

1

(2)

Since Ω is a positive definite matrix, all its eigenvalues are positive. Thus, Λ is factored into

Λ = Λ

1/2

Λ

1/2

where Λ

1/2

= diag(

λ

1

, . . . ,

λ

n

). Substituting in eq (1) gives

Λ =

1/2

Λ

1/2

A

= (AΛ

1/2

)(AΛ

1/2

)

.

Thus, we obtain

P =

1/2

.

1.2 (2)

Since { u

t

}

Tt=1

are mutually independent, Cov(u

t

, u

s

) = 0 for t ̸ = s. Thus, the variance­covariance matrix is given by

E(uu

) = σ

2

Ω = σ

2

 

 

 

 

 

z

12

0 · · · 0 0 z

22

· · · 0 .. . .. . .. . .. . 0 0 · · · z

T2

 

 

 

 

 

1.3 (3)

Let us introduce the lag operator L such that L

s

x

t

= x

ts

for s 1. Then, a first­order autore­

gressive scheme, u

t

= ρu

t−1

+ ϵ

t

, can be rewritten as

(1 ρL)u

t

= ϵ

t

u

t

= (1 ρL)

−1

ϵ

t

.

Without loss of generality, assume | ρ | < 1. Then, the inverse of first lag operator results in a series of infinite differences, that is,

u

t

= (1 + ρL + ρ

2

L

2

+ · · ·

t

= ϵ

t

+ ρϵ

t−1

+ ρ

2

ϵ

t−2

+ · · · .

2

(3)

Thus, E(u

t

) = 0 and the second­order moment of u

t

is

E(u

2t

) = E[ϵ

2t

+ ϵ

t

(ρϵ

t1

+ ρ

2

ϵ

t2

+ · · · ) + ρ

2

ϵ

2t1

+ ρϵ

t1

t

+ ρ

2

ϵ

t2

+ · · · ) + · · · ]

= E[ϵ

2t

+ ρ

2

ϵ

2t1

+ ρ

4

ϵ

2t2

+ · · · ]

= (1 + ρ

2

+ ρ

4

+ · · ·

2

= 1 1 ρ σ

2

Note that E(ϵ

t

ϵ

ts

) = 0 since { ϵ

t

}

t

are mutually independent. Also, it is simple to establish that

E(u

t

u

ts

) = E[ϵ

t

ts

+ ρϵ

ts1

+ · · · ) + · · · + ρ

s

ϵ

ts

ts

+ ρϵ

ts1

+ · · · ) + · · · ]

= E(ρ

s

ϵ

2ts

) = ρ

s

σ

2

1 ρ

2

This leads to V (u

t

) = (1 ρ

2

)

−1

σ

2

and Cov(u

t

, u

ts

) = ρ

s

(1 ρ

2

)

−1

σ

2

. Finally, the variance­

covariance matrix is given by

E(uu

) = σ

2

Ω = σ

2

1 1 ρ

2

 

 

 

 

 

1 ρ ρ

2

· · · ρ

T−1

ρ 1 ρ · · · ρ

T2

.. . .. . .. . .. . .. . ρ

T1

ρ

T2

ρ

T3

· · · 1

 

 

 

 

 

1.4 (4)

Let A be a T × T nonsingular transformation matrix. Then, we premultiply the regression model by A to obtain

Ay = (AX)β + Au. (2)

Then, the variance­covariance matrix of u

t

is

E(uu

) = E(Auu

A

) = σ

2

AΩA

.

If it were possible to specify A such that AΩA

= I

T

, then we could apply OLS to the transformed variables Ay and AX, and the estimates would have all the optimal properties of OLS (i.e. BLUE estimator).

Using the property which we proved in the question (1), we can find the matrix A which will hold AΩA

= I

T

. Since Ω is a positive definite matrix, there exists a nonsingular matrix P such that

3

(4)

Ω = P P

. Since P is nonsingular, P

1

ΩP

′−1

= I

T

. The appropriate matrix A is given by

A = P

1

.

Applying OLS to the transformed regression model (2) then gives

b = (X

A

AX )

1

X

A

Ay

= (X

P

′−1

P

1

X)

1

X

P

′−1

P

1

y

= (X

1

X)

1

X

1

y

1.5 (5)

Using the original regression model, we obtain the OLS estimator, β ˆ = (X

X)

1

X

y. Then, we have

E( ˆ β) = E(β + (X

X)

1

X

u) = β,

V ( ˆ β) = E ((X

X)

−1

X

uu

X(X

X)

−1

) = σ

2

(X

X)

−1

X

ΩX(X

X)

−1

.

The variance of GLS estimator which we derive in the question (4) is given by

V (b) = E((X

−1

X)

−1

X

−1

uu

−1

X(X

−1

X)

−1

)

= σ

2

(X

1

X)

1

X

1

ΩΩ

1

X(X

1

X)

1

= σ

2

(X

1

X)

1

.

Then,

V ( ˆ β) V (b)

2

[(X

X)

1

X

(X

1

X)

1

X

1

]Ω[(X

X)

1

X

(X

1

X)

1

X

1

]

2

AΩA

Ω is a variance­covariance matrix, which is a positive definite matrix. This implies that AΩA

is also a positive definite matrix (proof can be found at footnote 1 in the solution key #5). Hence, V ( ˆ β) V (b) is a positive definite matrix, which implies that the GLS estimator is more efficient than the OLS estimator if the error term is not homoscedasticity.

4

参照

関連したドキュメント

Keywords: nonlinear matrix equation, positive definite solution, iterative method.. Mathematical subject classification: 65F10, 65F30,

Let A, B be two n-by-n complex positive definite matrices, and all the eigen- values of B be real numbers.. It is easy to see that B −1 is a complex positive definite matrix and

2) See the second footnote to Table 1... Principal component analysis of the correlation matrix on the third set of craniofacial measurements from Japanese males. Solution

2) See the second footnote to Table 1... Principal component analysis of the correlation matrix on the second set of neurocranial and pelvic mea- surements from Japanese males.

[r]

The optimal positive definite symmetric matrix obtained by solving the -sensitivity minimiza- tion problem using the closed form solution is decomposed as follows:.. (32) where

Key Words: nonlinear elliptic equation; Hardy term; positive solution; singular solution; fast.. decay; slow decay; asymptotically self-similar solution;

Theorem 3.5 [5] Let M $\in R^{n\mathrm{X}n}$ be a positive definite matrix..