• 検索結果がありません。

Econometrics I: Solutions of Homework #13

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Econometrics I: Solutions of Homework #13"

Copied!
7
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Econometrics I: Solutions of Homework #13

Hiroki Kato * July 15, 2020

Contents

1 Solutions: Question 1 1

1.1 (1) . . . . 1 1.2 (2) . . . . 2 1.3 (3) . . . . 3

2 Solutions: Question 2 4

2.1 (1) . . . . 4 2.2 (2) . . . . 5 2.3 (3) . . . . 6

1 Solutions: Question 1

1.1 (1)

OLS estimator of β is given by

β ˆ = (X

X)

1

X

y = β + (X

X)

1

X

u = β + (

1 T

T

t=1

X

t

X

t

)

1

(

1 T

T

t=1

X

t

u

t

)

, (1)

*

e­mail:

[email protected]. Room 503. If you find any errors in handouts and materials,

please contact me via e­mail.

(2)

where X

t

is k × 1 vector whose elements are explanatory variables for observetion t. Taking the probability limit to both sides yields

plim

T→∞

β ˆ = β + lim

T→∞

( 1 T

T

t=1

X

t

X

t

)

1

plim

T→∞

( 1 T

T

t=1

X

t

u

t

)

(2)

First, we assume the following stationarity condition:

lim

T→∞

1 T

T

t=1

X

t

X

t

= M

xx

. (3)

Then, by g(X

n

)

p

g(X) if X

n

p

X, we have

plim

T→∞

( 1 T

T

t=1

X

t

X

t

)

1

= M

xx1

. (4)

We further assume zero covariance between X and u, that is,

plim

T→∞

( 1 T

T

t=1

X

t

u

t

)

= 0. (5)

By these two assumptions, we finally obtain plim

T→∞

β ˆ = β + M

xx1

· 0 = β. (6)

We can show the consistency of OLSE.

1.2 (2)

Greenberg and Webster (1983) states the central limit theorem as follows:

Z

1

, . . . , Z

n

are mutually independent. Z

i

is distributed with mean µ and variance Σ

i

for

i = 1, . . . , n. Then, we have the follwing result:

(3)

Using this theorem, we derive the asymptotic distribution of

1n

X

u. Define Z

i

= X

t

u

t

. By the assumption of u

t

, µ = E(Z

i

) = 0 and the variance of Z

i

is given by

Σ

i

= V (X

t

u

t

) = E[(X

t

u

t

)(X

t

u

t

)

] = σ

2

X

t

X

t

. (7) Then, we obtain Σ as follows:

Σ = lim

T→∞

( 1 n

T

t=1

σ

2

X

t

X

t

)

= σ

2

lim

T→∞

( 1 n

T

t=1

X

t

X

t

)

= σ

2

M

xx

. (8)

By the central limit theorm, we have

1

n X

u = 1

n

T

t=1

(X

t

u

t

0)

d

N (0, σ

2

M

xx

). (9)

1.3 (3)

We rewrite the equation (1) as follows:

T ( ˆ β β) = (

1 T

T

t=1

X

t

X

t

)

1

(

1 T

T

t=1

X

t

u

t

)

. (10)

We use the following proerty: z

n

= H

n

y

n

d

N (Hµ, HΩH

) where H

n

is an r × k matrix with plim

n→∞

H

n

= H and y

n

is a × 1 vector with y

n

d

N (µ, Ω). Because the equation (10) is seen as the form z

n

,

T ( ˆ β β) has a limiting normal distribution with zero mean and variance given by σ

2

M

xx1

M

xx

M

xx1

= σ

2

M

xx1

. (11) Thus, we can write

T ( ˆ β β)

d

N (0, σ

2

M

xx1

). (12)

(4)

2 Solutions: Question 2

2.1 (1)

The log­likelihood function is

log L

T

(θ) = log

T

i=1

f (X

i

; θ) =

T

i=1

log f (X

i

; θ). (13)

The maximum likelihood estimator is defined by θ ˆ arg max

θ

1 T

T

i=1

log f (X

i

; θ). (14)

Assuming the domain of X

i

does not depend on the parameter θ, we define the following expec­

tation of log f (X

i

; θ) as

log L(θ) = E [log f (X

i

; θ)] =

(log f(X

i

; θ))f (X

i

| θ

0

)dx, (15) where θ

0

is a unknown true parameter. The function log L(θ) is maximized at θ = θ

0

, that is, log L(θ) log L(θ

0

) for any θ bacuase

E[log f (X

i

; θ) log f(X

i

; θ

0

)]

=E [

log f (X

i

; θ) f(X

i

; θ

0

)

]

E

[ f (X

i

; θ) f(X

i

; θ

0

) 1

]

=

∫ ( f(X

i

; θ) f(X

;

θ

0

) 1

)

f(X

i

; θ

0

)dx

=

f(X

i

; θ)dx

f(X

i

; θ

0

)dx = 0.

Note that log x x 1.

By the weak law of large numbers, for any θ, T

−1

log L

T

(θ) log L(θ). By defenition, θ ˆ is the

(5)

2.2 (2)

Applying the central limit theorem with unequal variance yields

T ( 1

T

log L(θ)

∂θ µ )

= 1

T

T

i=1

( log f(X

i

; θ)

∂θ µ )

d

N (0, Σ), (16)

where

∂θ

log f(X

i

; θ) is distributed with mean µ and variance Σ

i

, and Σ = lim

T→∞

(T

1

T i=1

Σ

i

).

From (16), we have

T

lim

→∞

E [ 1

T

log L(θ)

∂θ ]

= µ, (17)

T

lim

→∞

T · Var [ 1

T

log L(θ)

∂θ ]

= Σ. (18)

We need the expectation and variance of

∂θ

log L(θ). Because L(θ) is a joint distribution, ∫

L(θ)dx = 1. Taking the first­order derivative with respect to θ on both sides yields

∂L(θ)

∂θ dx = 0

log L(θ)

∂θ L(θ)dx = 0 E

[ log L(θ)

∂θ ]

= 0.

Thus, we obtain

T

lim

→∞

E [ 1

T

log L(θ)

∂θ ]

= lim

T→∞

1 T E

[ log L(θ)

∂θ ]

= 0 = µ. (19)

To obtain the variance, taking the second­order derivative of ∫

L(θ)dx = 1 with respect to θ,

2

log L(θ)

∂θ∂θ

L(θ)dx +

log L(θ)

∂θ

log L(θ)

∂θ

L(θ)dx = 0

E

[

2

log L(θ)

∂θ∂θ

]

= E

[ log L(θ)

∂θ

log L(θ)

∂θ

]

(6)

Thus, we obtain the variance as follows:

Var

[ log L(θ)

∂θ ]

=E

[ log L(θ)

∂θ

log L(θ)

∂θ

]

E

[ log L(θ)

∂θ ]

2

=E

[ log L(θ)

∂θ

log L(θ)

∂θ

]

= E

[

2

log L(θ)

∂θ∂θ

]

=I(θ), (20)

where I(θ) is the information matrix. This leads to

T

lim

→∞

T · Var [ 1

T

log L(θ)

∂θ ]

= lim

T→∞

1 T Var

[ 1 T

log L(θ)

∂θ ]

= lim

T→∞

1

T I (θ) = Σ. (21) Hence, the asymptotic distribution is

1 T

T

i=1

log f (X

i

; θ)

∂θ

d

N (0, Σ) (22)

where Σ = lim

T→∞

T

1

I(θ).

2.3 (3)

Taking the first­order approximation of

∂θ

log L(ˆ θ) = 0 around θ ˆ = θ yields

log L(θ)

∂θ +

2

log L(θ)

∂θ∂θ

θ θ) = 0.

We rewrite it as follows:

θ ˆ θ =

(

2

log L(θ)

∂θ∂θ

)

1

log L(θ)

∂θ

( )

( )

(7)

Since Σ is symmetric, using the Slutsky’s theorem, we have the asymptotic distribution of

Tθ θ) as follows:

Tθ θ)

d

N (0, Σ

1

ΣΣ

1

) (24)

d

N (0, Σ

1

) (25)

参照

関連したドキュメント

In this, the first ever in-depth study of the econometric practice of nonaca- demic economists, I analyse the way economists in business and government currently approach

We recall here the de®nition of some basic elements of the (punctured) mapping class group, the Dehn twists, the semitwists and the braid twists, which play an important.. role in

A., Some application of sample Analogue to the probability integral transformation and coverages property, American statiscien 30 (1976), 78–85.. Mendenhall W., Introduction

In this section we study the Legendre equation (1.1) on the whole real line R and note that, in addition to its singular points at −∞ and +∞, it also has singularities at the

We mention that the first boundary value problem, second boundary value prob- lem and third boundary value problem; i.e., regular oblique derivative problem are the special cases

“Breuil-M´ezard conjecture and modularity lifting for potentially semistable deformations after

We construct a sequence of a Newton-linearized problems and we show that the sequence of weak solutions converges towards the solution of the nonlinear one in a quadratic way.. In

In other more general cases we have used the asymptotic iteration method to find accurate numerical solutions for arbitrary values of the potential parameters g, w, and