• 検索結果がありません。

Econometrics I: Solutions of Homework 7

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "Econometrics I: Solutions of Homework 7"

Copied!
6
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Econometrics I: Solutions of Homework 7

Hiroki Kato * May 29, 2020

Contents

1 Solutions 1

1.1 (1) . . . . 1

1.2 (2) . . . . 2

1.3 (3) . . . . 3

1.4 (4) . . . . 3

1.5 (5) . . . . 4

1.6 (6) . . . . 4

1.7 (7) . . . . 4

1.8 (8) . . . . 5

1.9 (9) . . . . 6

1 Solutions

1.1 (1)

A transformation matrix M is defined by

M = I

T

1 T ii

,

*

e­mail:

[email protected]. Room 503. If you find any errors in handouts and materials,

please contact me via e­mail.

(2)

where I

T

is T × T identity matrix

1

. Then, M i = I

T

i 1

T i(i

i) = i 1

T iT = 0, and

M e = I

T

e 1

T i(i

e) = e 1 T i

T t=1

e

t

= e.

Note that third equality comes from the property of the OLS estimator, that is, ∑

t

e

t

/T = ¯ e = 0.

1.2 (2)

First, I will show the first equality. By M e = e, premultiplying e on M yields M e = M y M X β ˆ

e = M y M X β. ˆ Then, we obtain

e

e = y

M

M y β ˆ

X

M

M X β ˆ = y

M y βX ˆ

M X β ˆ

The second equality comes from the fact that M is symmetric and idempotent. The M is idempotent because

M

2

= (

I

T

1 T ii

)(

I

T

1 T ii

)

= I

T

1

T ii

1

T ii

+ 1

T

2

i(i

i)i

= I

T

1

T ii

1

T ii

+ 1 T

2

i(T )i

= I

T

1

T ii

= M.

Second, I will show the second equality. By M e = e and M i = 0, premultiplying e = y i β ˆ

1

X

2

β ˆ

2

on M gives

M e = M y M i β ˆ

1

M X

2

β ˆ

2

e = M y M X

2

β ˆ

2

1

This matrix is different from the matrix

M

that I used in solutions to HW5.

(3)

Then, we obtain

e

e = (M y M X

2

β ˆ

2

)

(M y M X

2

β ˆ

2

)

= y

M y β ˆ

2

X

2

M y y

M X

2

β ˆ

2

+ ˆ β

2

X

2

M X

2

β ˆ

2

= y

M y β ˆ

2

X

2

M X

2

β ˆ

2

β ˆ

2

X

2

M X

2

β ˆ

2

+ ˆ β

2

X

2

M X

2

β ˆ

2

= y

M y β ˆ

2

X

2

M X

2

β ˆ

2

.

The third equality comes from X

2

M y = X

2

M X

2

β ˆ

2

. This holds because

X

2

e = X

2

M y X

2

M X

2

β ˆ

2

0 = X

2

M y X

2

M X

2

β ˆ

2

Note that X

2

e = 0 holds since X

e = X

y X

X β ˆ = (X

X) ˆ β X

X β ˆ = 0 by β ˆ = (X

X)

1

X

y.

1.3 (3)

Since y

M y is a scalar,

R

2

= 1 e

e

y

M y = y

M y

y

M y e

e

y

M y = y

M y e

e y

M y =

β ˆ

2

X

2

M X

2

β ˆ

2

y

M y

1.4 (4)

R β ˆ = R(X

X)

1

X

y = R(X

X)

1

X

(Xβ + u) = + R(X

X)

1

X

u

Since u is normally distributed, Rb is also normally distributed. Expectation and variance of Rb are as follows:

E(R β) = ˆ

V (R β) = ˆ E[(Rb Rβ)(Rb Rβ)

] = E[R(X

X)

1

X

uu

X

(X

X)

1

R

] = σ

2

R(X

X)

1

R

Thus, the distribution of Rb is

R β ˆ N (Rβ, σ

2

R(X

X)

1

R

).

(4)

1.5 (5)

By the question (4), we can replace by r if the null hypothesis is correct. Thus,

R β ˆ N (r, σ

2

R(X

X)

1

R

),

or

(R β ˆ r) N (0, σ

2

R(X

X)

1

R

),

1.6 (6)

R =

 

 

 

 

 

0 1 0 · · · 0 0 0 1 · · · 0 .. . .. . .. . .. . .. . 0 0 0 · · · 1

 

 

 

 

 

= (0, I

k1

)

where R is (k 1) × k matrix. Thus, G = k 1 and r = 0.

1.7 (7)

We will show that, given R and r,

(R β ˆ r)

(R(X

X)

1

R

)

1

(R β ˆ r) = ˆ β

2

X

2

M X

2

β ˆ

2

.

By the solution to (6), define R = (0, I

k1

) and r = 0. Then, R β ˆ r = ˆ β

2

.

Next, given R and r as defined above, we will show (R(X

X)

1

R

)

1

= X

2

M X

2

. First, by X = (i, X

2

),

(X

X)

1

=

 

 

i

X

2

 

 (

i X

2

) 

 

1

=

 

i

i i

X

2

X

2

i X

2

X

2

 

1

=

 

B

11

B

12

B

21

B

22

 

(5)

where B

ij

is unknown matrices. Then, we have

R(X

X)

1

R

= (

0 I

k1

) 

 

B

11

B

12

B

21

B

22

 

 

 0 I

k1

 

 = (

B

21

B

22

) 

 

 0 I

k1

 

 = B

22

Thus, we only need to calculate B

22

. By the property of the inverse of a partitioned matrix,

B

22

= (X

2

X

2

X

2

i(i

i)

1

i

X

2

)

1

= (X

2

I

T

X

2

X

2

( 1

T ii

)X

2

)

1

= (X

2

(I

T

1

T ii

)X

2

)

1

= (X

2

M X

2

)

1

Hence, (R(X

X)

1

R

)

1

= ((X

2

M X

2

)

1

)

1

= X

2

M X

2

. Finally, given R = (0, I

k1

) and r = 0, we obtain

(R β ˆ r)

(R(X

X)

1

R

)

1

(R β ˆ r) = ˆ β

2

X

2

M X

2

β ˆ

2

.

1.8 (8)

By solutions to (6) and (7), test statistic for H

0

: β

2

= 0 is β ˆ

2

X

2

M X

2

β ˆ

2

/(k 1)

e

e/(T k) F (k 1, T k) We will show that

R

2

/(k 1) (1 R

2

)/(T k) =

β ˆ

2

X

2

M X

2

β ˆ

2

/(k 1) e

e/(T k) ,

where R

2

is the coefficient of determination.

By solutions to (3), we obtain

(y

M y )R

2

= ˆ β

2

X

2

M X

2

β ˆ

2

,

and,

(y

M y)(1 R

2

) = e

e.

(6)

Since y

M y is scalar, we can obtain

β ˆ

2

X

2

M X

2

β ˆ

2

/(k 1)

e

e/(T k) = R

2

/(k 1) (1 R

2

)/(T k)

1.9 (9)

First, we test β = 0, using t­statistic. Recall that t­statistic is given by

t =

β ˆ β s/ √∑

t

(X

t

X) ¯

2

t(T k)

where s

2

is unbiased and consistent estimator of σ

2

. Since V ( ˆ β) = σ

2

/ ∑

t

(X

t

X) ¯

2

, we can calculate t­statistic as follows:

t =

β ˆ β SE( ˆ β) .

Thus,

t = 0.65 0

0.240 = 2.70833

Under the degree of freedom is 4 2 = 2, the test statistic at 1%, 5%, and 10% significance level is 9.9248, 4.3072, and 2.9200, respectively. Thus, we cannot reject the null hypothesis β = 0.

Second, we test β = 0, using F ­statistic with R

2

. By solutions to (8), a test statistic is given by R

2

/(k 1)

(1 R

2

)/(T k) = 0.786/(2 1)

(1 0.786)/(4 2) = 7.345794

Under F F (1, 2), the test statistic at 1%, 5%, and 10% significance level is 98.50251, 18.51282, and 8.526316, respectively. Thus, we cannot reject the null hypothesis β = 0.

Overall, F ­test obtains the same result as t­test. Note that the square of t­statistic is approximate

to F ­statistic, that is, t

2

= (2.70833)

2

= 7.335069 7.345794.

参照

関連したドキュメント

In this, the first ever in-depth study of the econometric practice of nonaca- demic economists, I analyse the way economists in business and government currently approach

The initial results in this direction were obtained in [Pu98] where a description of quaternion algebras over E is presented and in [GMY97] where an explicit description of

One can show that if C e is a small deformation of a coassociative 4–fold C of type (a) or (b) then C e is also of type (a) or (b) and thus, Theorem 1.1 implies analogous results on

If you want to study different themes and learn how to talk about them more naturally in English, please apply to join one of my classes.

A conformal spin structure of signature (2, 2) is locally induced by a 2- dimensional projective structure via the Fefferman-type construction if and only if any of the

In the section we investigate the connection between DF-valued holomorphic mappings of uniformly bounded type on DF-spaces and the linear topological invariants (LB ∞ ) and (DN ).

If you are expecting the delay of resignation certificate submission, please enclose the memorandum clarifying the reason that you cannot submit,and the approximate date when

Q is contained in the graph of a