Econometrics I: Solutions of Homework #11
Hiroki Kato * July 3, 2020
Contents
1 Solutions 1
1.1 (1) . . . . 1
1.2 (2) . . . . 2
1.3 (3) . . . . 3
1.4 (4) . . . . 4
1 Solutions
1.1 (1)
Since we assume u
tis normally distributed with E(u
t) = 0 and V (u
t) = σ
2, the density function of u
tis given by
f (u
t) = 1
(2πσ
2)
(1/2)exp (
− 1 2σ
2u
2t) .
By the mutual independent assumption, the joint density function of u
1, . . . , u
Tis given by
f(u
1, . . . , u
T) = 1
(2πσ
2)
(T/2)exp (
− 1 2σ
2∑
T t=1u
2t)
*
email: [email protected]. Room 503. If you find any errors in handouts and materials,
please contact me via email.
Transforming u
t, we have the following likelihood function;
1L(α, β, σ
2| y
1, . . . , y
T) ≡ 1
(2πσ
2)
(T/2)exp (
− 1 2σ
2∑
T t=1(y
t− α − βx
t)
2)
. (1)
1.2 (2)
To obtain the loglikelihood function, we take a natural logarithm of (1) as follows:
log L(α, β, σ
2| y
1, . . . , y
T) = − T
2 log(2π) − T
2 log(σ
2) − 1 2σ
2∑
T t=1(y
t− α − βx
t)
2Taking a firstorder derivative with respect to unknown parameters (α, β, σ
2) yields
∂L(α, β, σ
2| y
1, . . . , y
T)
∂α = 1
σ
2∑
T t=1(y
t− α − βx
t) = 0 (2)
∂L(α, β, σ
2| y
1, . . . , y
T)
∂β = 1
σ
2∑
T t=1(y
t− α − βx
t)x
t= 0 (3)
∂L(α, β, σ
2| y
1, . . . , y
T)
∂σ
2= − T
2 1 σ
2+ 1
2σ
4∑
T t=1(y
t− α − βx
t)
2= 0 (4)
Rewriting the equation (2) and the equation (3) yields
T y ¯ − αT ˜ − βT ˜ x ¯ = 0,
∑
t
y
tx
t− αT ˜ x ¯ − β ˜ ∑
t
x
2t= 0,
where y ¯ = ∑
t
y
t/T and x ¯ = ∑
t
x
t/T .
First, using the first equation, we can obtain the ML estimator of α, denoted by α, as follows; ˜
˜
α = ¯ y − β ˜ x. ¯
Substituting this estimator into the second equation, we obtain the ML estimator of β, denoted by
β, as follows; ˜
− β[ ˜ ∑
t
x
2t− T x ¯
2] + ∑
t
y
tx
t− T x¯ ¯ y = 0 β ˜ =
∑
t
y
tx
t− T x ¯ y ¯
∑
t
x
2t− T x ¯
2β ˜ =
∑
t
(y
t− y)(x ¯
t− x) ¯
∑
t
(x
t− x) ¯
2Solving the equation (4) gives the ML estimator of σ
2, denoted by σ ˜
2, as follows;
˜ σ
2=
∑
Tt=1
(y
t− α ˜ − βx ˜
t)
2T .
In summary, the ML estimator of θ is
θ ˜ = ( ˜ α, β, ˜ σ ˜
2)
′= (
¯ y − β ˜ x, ¯
∑
t
(y
t− y)(x ¯
t− x) ¯
∑
t
(x
t− x) ¯
2,
∑
Tt=1
(y
t− α ˜ − βx ˜
t)
2T
)
′.
1.3 (3)
By the equation (2), (3), and (4),
∂
2L(α, β, σ
2| y
1, . . . , y
T)
∂α
2= − T
σ
2∂
2L(α, β, σ
2| y
1, . . . , y
T)
∂β
2= −
∑
t
x
2tσ
2∂
2L(α, β, σ
2| y
1, . . . , y
T)
∂(σ
2)
2= T 2σ
4− 1
σ
6∑
T t=1(y
t− α − βx
t)
2= T 2σ
4− 1
σ
6∑
T t=1u
2t∂
2L(α, β, σ
2| y
1, . . . , y
T)
∂α∂β = −
∑
t
x
tσ
2∂
2L(α, β, σ
2| y
1, . . . , y
T)
∂α∂σ
2= − 1
σ
4∑
T t=1(y
t− α − βx
t) = − 1 σ
4∑
T t=1u
t∂
2L(α, β, σ
2| y
1, . . . , y
T)
∂β∂σ
2= − 1
σ
4∑
T t=1(y
t− α − βx
t)x
t= − 1 σ
4∑
T t=1u
tx
tBy the distributional assumption, we have ∑
t
E(u
t) = 0, ∑
t
E(u
t)x
t= 0, and ∑
t
E(u
2t) =
∑
t
[E(u
2t) − E(u
t)] = ∑
t
V (u
t) = T σ
2. Thus, the information matrix I(θ) is given by
I(θ) = − E
( ∂
2L(α, β, σ
2| y
1, . . . , y
T)
∂θ∂θ
′)
=
T σ2
∑
txt
σ2
0
∑
txt
σ2
∑
tx2t
σ2
0
0 0
2σT4
1.4 (4)
Step 1: VarianceCovariance Matrix of MLE
By the CramerRao lower bound theorem, the inverse of information matrix I (θ)
−1provides a lower bound of the variancecovariance matrix for unbiased estimators of θ.
2Then, the variance
covariance matrix of θ ˜ is
σ2 T
∑
tx2t
∑
t(xt−x)¯2
− σ
2∑ x¯t(xt−x)¯ 2
0
− σ
2∑ x¯t(xt−x)¯ 2
σ2
∑
t(xt−¯x)2
0
0 0
2σT4
Step 2: Derive the expectation and variance of OLSE
The OLS estimator of β, denoted by β, is equivalent to the ML estimator of ˆ β, denoted by β. That ˜ is,
β ˆ =
∑
t
(y
t− y)(x ¯
t− x) ¯
∑
t
(x
t− x) ¯
2. Thus, we have E ( ˆ β) = β and V ( ˆ β) = σ
2/( ∑
t