Checking the quality of dental education and training
Making sure the professionals on our registers keep up to date
Taking action when the ability, bahaviour, or health of one of the professionals on our registers makes them unfit to practise
13
www.gdc-uk.org www.gdc-uk.org
GDC – what we do and and why we do it
protecting patients regulating the dental teamby
14
www.gdc-uk.org www.gdc-uk.org
GDC – what we do and and why we do it
<i> Preparing for Practice
<ii> Standards for Education
<iii> The Quality Assurance Process
15
<i> Preparing for Practice (learning outcomes)
OVERARCHING (7) CLINICAL (95)
1 Individual patient care (90) 1.1 Foundations of practice (13)
1.2 Comprehensive patient assessment (6) 1.3 not applicable for dentists 1.4 Diagnosis (2)
1.5 Treatment planning (6) 1.6 not applicable for dentists 1.7 Patient management (11)
1.8 Patient and public safety (8) 1.9 Treatment of acute oral conditions (4) 1.10 Health promotion and disease prevention (7) 1.11 Management and treatment of periodontal disease (6) 1.12 Hard and soft tissue disease (8)
1.13 Management of the developing and developed dentition (7) 1.14 Restoration and replacement of teeth (12) 2 Population-based health and care (5) COMMUNICATION (13)
3 Patients, their representatives and the public (4) 4 Team and the wider healthcare environment (4) 5 Generic communication skills (5) PROFESSIONALISM (12)
6 Patients and the public (5) 7 Ethical and legal (4) 8 Teamwork (3) 9 Development of self and others (7) MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP (22)
10 Managing self (8) 11 Managing and working with others (8) 12 Managing the clinical and working environment (6)
16
List of overarching outcomes (7 つの “must”)
Practise safely and effectively, making the high quality long term care of patients the first concern
Recognise the role and responsibility of being a registrant and demonstrate professionalism through their education, training and practice in accordance with GDC guidance
Demonstrate effective clinical decision making
Describe the principles of good research, how to access research and interpret it for use as part of an evidence based approach to practice
Apply an evidence-based approach to learning, practice, clinical judgment and decision making and utilize critical thinking and problem solving skills
Accurately assess their own capabilities and limitations, demonstrating reflective practice, in the interest of high quality patient care and act within these boundaries
Recognise the importance of lifelong learning and apply it to practice 17
<i> Preparing for Practice (learning outcomes) 142 の “must”
1.1.1 Explain. Evaluate and apply the principles of an evidence-based approach to learning, clinical and professional practice and decision making
1.1.7 Describe the relevant physiology and discuss its application to patient management
1.4.1 Synthesise the full results of the patient’s assessment and make clinical judgement as appropriate
5.1 Use appropriate methods to provide accurate, clear and comprehensive information when referring patients to other dental and healthcare professionals
18 25 と 26 にも
STANDARD 1 – PROTECTING PATIENTS (1-8)
STANDARD 2 – QUALITY EVALUATION AND REVIEW OF THE PROGRAMME (9-15)
STANDARD 3 – STUDENT ASSESSMENT (16-26) STANDARD 4 – EQUALITY AND DIVERSITY (27-29)
<ii> Standards for Education
24 に！ 19
4 つの基準と 29 の“must”
“must”の一端は
<iii> The Quality Assurance Process Inspection panel
Lay inspector (chair) Three dentists:
One with significant experience in general dental practice Two with significant experience of undergraduate dental education
QA Officer (GDC)
20
Pre-inspection Questionnaire BDS Inspection round 2012-14
This questionnaire enables us to get an overview of the programme and how it is delivered. There is also an opportunity for you to provide us with any additional information you feel we need to know about.
We invite you to complete the questionnaire, providing full answers to each question in the boxes on this form. Please state clearly if any part of a question is not applicable. Your answers should provide information directly relating to the programme. If you reference any document in your answers, please indicate clearly the page/section of the attachment where the relevant information is found. Should any questions be unclear, please contact us at [email protected].
You will also need to complete the two annexes at the end of this questionnaire:
Annex One – Standards for Education mapping table Annex Two – Learning Outcomes mapping table
You should collate the documentation that you have listed as evidence in Annex One. All evidence that is available electronically, but does not contain confidential information relating to individuals (patients, students and staff) should be submitted to the GDC.
The completed form, annexes and documentary evidence should be uploaded to the GDC extranet page. Instructions for this will follow shortly.
The evidence that contains confidential and sensitive information should be available during the inspection in the meeting room allocated to the inspection panel. This can be in electronic or hard copy.
We will contact you for further information if the documentation is unclear or incomplete.
If you have any questions, please email the QA team at [email protected]
21 22
12 Provide details of when during the programme students attend the various clinical locations, describe these locations, how long a student spends at a location and the activities undertaken at each
15 Please briefly summarise the assessment and delivery strategy for the programme in fewer than 500 words. (A copy of the strategy should be attached to the Standards for Education mapping document under Requirement 16).
Any other information
17 Please add anything further you wish us to know about this programme
23
Annex One – Standards for Educa:on Mapping Table
Standard 1: PROTECTING PATIENTS (8)
Standard 2: QUALITY EVALUATION AND REVIEW OF THE PROGRAMME (7) Standard 3: STUDENT ASSESSMENT (11)
Standard 4: EQUALITY AND DIVERSITY (3) 必須事項
必須事項の達成具合を示す証拠 教育プログラムは充分か？
4 つの standard に 29 の “must”
24
■ ４．ドイツ・英国の歯学教育認証制度について
Annex Two – Learning outcomes for Den:sts Mapping Table
アウトカム アウトカムを達成する教育モジュール アウトカムの評価方法
Overarchingに加えて４つのドメイン Clinical/ Communication/ Professionalism Management and leadership
7 の “must”
142 の “must”- “must” の一端は
に 26 25
Communication Communication Professionalism Management and leadership
26
www.gdc-uk.org
Inspection timeline
Step 1 – Confirm Inspection panel and date of inspections 6 months before inspection Step 2 – Send Pre-inspection Questionnaire to provider
Provider returns questionnaire
4 months before inspection 2 months before inspection
Step 3 – Analyse pre-inspection questionnaire
St 4 I titi l i t t l f / ti
Within 2 weeks of receiving documentation After panel evaluation of Step 5 – Inspector meeting
Step 4 – Intitial inspector teleconference/meeting questionnaire Evening before inspection Step 6 – The Programme Inspection
Questions relating to the standards and requirements to triangulate evidence
1 – 2 days evidence.
Preliminary findings/feedback sent to the provider. Urgent issues
communicated as soon as possible 1 month after programme
inspection
Step 7 – Student Sign-off Inspection Usually up to 6 months after
the programme inspection
27
www.gdc-uk.org
Inspection timeline
Step 8 – Post Student Sign-off Inspection Summary Meeting Final day of student-sign off inspection Step 9 – Report Drafting
•Draft Inspection Report –programme inspection (internal use only)
•Preliminary feedback with urgent actions – from the programme inspection (for the
30 working days of programme inspection 1 month after programme Preliminary feedback with urgent actions from the programme inspection (for the
provider)
•Combined Report – from the programme and student sign off inspection (for the provider)
P id d ith f t l ti
1 month after programme inspection 2 months after student sign off inspection Up to 10 days after receiving Provider responds with factual corrections
Provider responds with observations Provider’s comments considered by inspection panel
Up to 10 days after receiving combined report Up to 1 month after receiving combined report Step 10 – Report and Observations to Registrar (and Council) for Decision 2-3 months after the student
sign-off inspection
Step 11 – Publish Report and Observations Step 12 – Record and Monitor Findings
2 weeks after decision on sufficiency is made by Registrar Ongoing
p g
Step 13 – Feedback and further stages
g g
After inspection and finalisation of report 28
www.gdc-uk.org www.gdc-uk.org
GDC – what we do and and why we do it
<i> Preparing for Practice
<ii> Standards for Education
<iii> The Quality Assurance Process
29