• 検索結果がありません。

B Uniform weak convergence of probability measures on posi- tive reals, which are defined by iteration

B.2 Proofs

(iv) ϕu(t)is continuous in (u, t)[0,1]×R.

(v) The constants νu,C1,u,C2,u in (158) can be chosen to be independent ofu∈[0,1].

In particular,

sup

ξR sup

u[0,1]ρu(ξ)<∞.

32 (i) Possibly, the constantb0 in the theorem can be chosen to be independent of u∈ U, and the convergence in (159) may be uniform inu. This is left open.

(ii) Is it possible that (158) and related assumptions (originally from the second assumption in定理65) would imply P({0}) = 0 and the tightness of {Pn} on (0,∞) (namely, the mass of Pn do not accumulate at {0}), and consequently uniformity of convergence lim

n→∞Gn(s) =G(s)onRe(s)K, which did not hold in general from the assumptions in 定理78?

The following is a direct consequence of定理85,定理87, and定理79.

88 Pn,u in定理85 converges weakly asn→ ∞toPu uniformly inu∈[0,1].

This and (162) and (161) further imply, for|s|C, λu|gk,u(s/λu)||s|

1 +Mk

λu |s|

C

1 +Mk

λC

C.

Thereforegk+1,u(s) =g1,u(λugk,u(s/λu)) is regular on|s|C and

|g1,u(λugk,u(s/λu))−λugk,u(s/λu)| M|λugk,u(s/λu)|2M

|s|+Mλk

u|s|22

M

1 + MλkC

2

|s|2 M(1 +()2|s|2,

(167)

where we also used (162) and C

M in the last line.

Using (166) and (167) we finally have

|gk+1,u(s)−s||g1,u(λugk,u(s/λu))−λugk,u(s/λu)|+λu|gk,u(s/λu)−s/λu|

Mk

λu +M(1 +()2

|s|2

Mk

λ +M(1 +()2

|s|2=Mk+1|s|2, |s|C,

which implies (165) forn=k+ 1. By induction, we have (165) for alln.

定理74 の証明. (i) Fixu∈ U and suppress the suffixuhere.

Since定理72 implies thatgn,n= 1,2,3,· · ·, are regular on|s|< C, they have Mclaurin expansion:

gn(s) = k=1

an,ksk.

Note that (140) implies an,1 = 1 for all n. Substituting the Mclaurin series in (139) and comparing coefficients ofsk fork= 2,3,4,· · ·, we have (usingan,1= 1),

an+1,2= 1

λan,2+a1,2, (168)

and

an+1,k= 1

λk1an,k+ k

=2

a1,λ

j1+j2+···+j=k

m=1

an,jm

1

λk, k= 3,4,5,· · ·. (169) The assumptionλ=λuλ >1 and (168) imply existence of limit

α2= lim

n→∞an,2. We proceed with induction onk and assume the existence of limit

α= lim

n→∞an,, ! < k.

Then the second term in the right hand side of (169) converges as n → ∞, hence (169) implies, with λ >1, existence of limit

αk = lim

n→∞an,k. (170)

By induction, the limit (170) exists for allk= 2,3,4,· · ·.

Applying定理73 to{gn}, we see that for any subsequence there exists subsubsequence{gn}, which is uniformly convergent on compact subsets of{s∈C| |s|< C}:

∃g(s) = lim

→∞gn(s) = lim

→∞

k=1

an,ksk= k=1

αksk, |s|< C.

(Limit and series is interchangeable because uniform convergence of regular functions implies interchange- ability of derivative and series.) Since the right hand side is independent of subsequences, the limitgis in- dependent of subsequences. Therefore{gn}converges uniformly on compact subsets of{s∈C| |s|< C} to a regular functiong(s) =

k=1

αksk.

Lettingn→ ∞in (139) and (140), and noting the uniformness of convergence of{gn}, we have (141) and (142).

(ii) As in the above proof, consider the McLaurin expansion h(s) =

k=1

bksk. Then (142) (forh) impliesbk = 1 and (141) implies

b2= 1 λu

b2+a1,2, (171)

and

bk= 1 λku1

bk+ k

=2

a1,λu

j1+j2+···+j=k

m=1

bjm

1

λku , k= 3,4,5,· · ·. (172) The assumption λu >1 and (171) imply b2 = a1,2

1λ1u , and by induction onk with (172), we find that bk is uniquely determined for all k= 2,3,4,· · ·. Hence the two equations (141) and (142) determine h

completely, and by definition it must coincide withgu.

定理78 の証明. Convergence of {Gn} implies that the sequence Gn(−C/2) =

0

eCξ/2Pn(), n = 1,2,3,· · ·, is bounded, which further implies, by命題76, that{Pn |n= 1,2,3,· · ·}is tight. Therefore for any subsequence ofPn,n= 1,2,3,· · ·, there exists a weakly converging subsubsequence. 命題77 implies that the limit measure is also supported on non-negative reals.

Suppose thatPnkconverges weakly to a Borel probability measurePsupported on [0,∞) ask→ ∞. We shall prove thatPis independent of subsequence{nk}. Put ˜G(s) =

[0,)

eP(). 命題75 then implies that ˜G(s) is defined on complexssatisfyingRe(s)0, regular onRe(s)>0and continuous on Re(s) 0. Note that if Re(s) 0, then |e| = eRe(s)ξ 1, ξ 0, hence e is a bounded continuous function onξ∈[0,∞). Therefore weak convergence ofPnk to P and the support properties of the measures imply

klim→∞Gnk(s) = ˜G(s), Re(s)0. (173) Comparing (144) and (173), we see that the regular functionsG and ˜G coincide on {s∈C|Re(s)>

0, |s| < C}. Uniqueness of analytic continuation implies that ˜G is independent of the subsequence {nk}. HenceGis analytically continued toRe(s)>0, and uniquely continued as a contiguous function toRe(s)0, and satisfies

nlim→∞Gn(s) =G(s), Re(s)0. (174) Characteristic function determines probability measure, hence P also is independent of the sub- sequence {nk}. This proves that Pn converges weakly as n → ∞ to a Borel probability measure P supported on non-negative reals.

We turn to a proof that the convergence (174) is uniform on compact sets in{s∈ C|Re(s)0}. LetK, K>0 and consider (174) on J ={s∈C|0Re(s)K, |Im(s)|K}, using an idea in the proof of uniform convergence of characteristic functions [5, Theorem 5.3]. Let( >0 . Since{Pn}is tight, there existsL >0 such that Pn((L,∞))< (,n= 1,2,3,· · ·, and P((L,∞))< (. Sinceesξ is uniformly continuous (as a function of complex s and real ξ) on {s C | |s| 1} ×[0, L], sup

0ξL

|esξ1| is continuous on|s|1 . Therefore there existsδ >0 such that

sup

0ξL

|esξ1|< (, |s|< δ.

Hence if|s|< δ,

|Gn(s+s)−Gn(s)|

0

eRe(s)ξ|esξ1|Pn()

0 |esξ1|Pn()(+ 2Pn((L,∞)) 3(, Re(s)0, |s|< δ, n=1,2,3,· · ·,

and a similar estimate forG.

SinceJ is a compact set, there exists a finite number, say!, of pointss1, s2,· · ·, s inJ such that for anys∈J there exists 1j!such that|s−sj|< δ. Choosing an integer n2such that

|Gn(sj)−G(sj)|< (, nn2, j= 1,2,· · ·, !, we can find 1j!for anys∈J, so that

|Gn(s)−G(s)||Gn(s)−Gn(sj)|+|Gn(sj)−G(sj)|+|G(sj)−G(s)|<7(,

nn2, 0Re(s)K, |Im(s)|K. (175)

which implies uniform convergence ofGn(s) toG(s) onJ.

定理79. の証明. Following the proof in [1, §2.6, §2.5] for the case without parameter u, we prove the theorem along the following outline.

(i) Prove

nlim→∞ sup

u[0,1]

f(x)Pu,n(dx)

f(x)Pu(dx)

= 0, (176)

(a) when f is a Fourier transform f(x) =

e1yxg(y)dy of an integrable function g, using Fubini’s theorem and the assumption on continuity inuof characteristic functions,

(b) whenf is a continuous function of compact support, by uniformly approximatingf by a series of functions in the above considered class,

(c) when f is a bounded continuous functions, by approximating f by a series of continuous functions of compact support, using tightness of{Pu,n}and continuity property of probability measures.

(ii) Approximate A0 by closed subsets and ¯A by open neighborhood uniformly in u, to approximate the defining function ofA, and then use (176).

Let us proceed with our proof.

First we prove (176) forf which has a formf(x) =

e1yxg(y)dy with an integrable functiong.

By assumption, characteristic functionφn,u(t) is continuous int and converges asn→ ∞uniformly in uhenceφu(t) is continuous int. This implies

sup

u[0,1]u,n(t)−φu,(t)|= sup

u[0,1]Qu,n(t)−φu,(t)|,

which further implies that this quantity is measurable with respect to t. We can therefore consider integration, and using Fubini’s theorem,

sup

u[0,1]

f(x)Pu,n(dx)

f(x)Pu(dx)

sup

u[0,1]u,n(t)−φu,(t)||g(t)|dt.

Characteristic functions are bounded (its absolute value is 1 or less) andgis integrable, hence domi- nated convergence theorem can be applied. By assumption that φn(t) converges for eacht uniformly in uasn→ ∞,

nlim→∞ sup

u[0,1]

f(x)Pu,n(dx)

f(x)Pu(dx) lim

n→∞

sup

u[0,1]u,n(t)−φu,(t)||g(t)|dt= 0. which implies (176) for this class of functionf.

Next we prove that a continuous functionfwith compact support, can be approximated (with respect to sup norm) by functions in the class considered above, which implies, that (176) holds also forf. More explicitly, we shall prove that if we put, forn= 1,2,3,· · ·andt∈R,

gn(t) = 1

2πet2/(2n)

e1tyf(y)dy, hn(x) =

e1txgn(t)dt,

thenhn(x) converges tof(x) as n→ ∞uniformly inx. (Note thatgn is integrable.) Using Fubini’s theorem,

hn(x) = 1

2π e1t(xy)t2/(2n)dt f(y)dy= n

2π

en(xy)2/2f(y)dy

= 1

2π

et2/2f(x+ t

√n)dt.

Dividing the range of integration to|t|aand|t|> a, we have

|hn(x)−f(x)| 1

2π

et2/2|f(x+ t

√n)−f(x)|dt

sup

|t|a

|f(x+ t

√n)−f(x)|+

2 sup

x |f(x)| 2π

|t|>a

et2/2dt.

f is a continuous function of compact support, hence sup

x |f(x)|<∞and also is uniformly continuous in x, hence the first term in the right hand side of the above equation converges to 0 asn→ ∞uniformly in x. Lettinga→ ∞, the second term also disappears. Sincea >0 is arbtrary and the left hand side is independent ofa, we therefore have

nlim→∞sup

x |hn(x)−f(x)|= 0. Next we prove that (176) holds for bounded continuous functionf.

LetK >0 . There exists continuous functiongof compact support such that g(x) =f(x), |x|K, g(x) = 0, |x|> K+ 1.

Since f is bounded, c = supx|f(x)−g(x)|< . Choose a continuous function hof compact support such that

h(x)



=c, |x|K−1,

[0, c], K−1<|x|< K,

= 0, |x|K.

It then holds that|f(x)−g(x)|c−h(x),x∈R. We also have

|f(x)−g(x)|Pu(dx)cPu([−K, K]c).

Applying (176) onh, we have

nlim→∞ sup

u[0,1]

h(x)Pu,n(dx)

h(x)Pu(dx) = 0. In particular, for any( >0, we have

∃n0; (∀nn0)(∀u∈[0,1])

(c−h(x))Pu,n(dx)−(

c−

h(x)Pu(dx) =

(c−h(x))Pu(dx)cPu([−K+ 1, K−1]c).

This and

|f(x)−g(x)|Pu,n(dx)c−

h(x)Pu,n(dx) imply

nlim→∞ sup

u[0,1]

|f(x)−g(x)|Pu,n(dx)c sup

u[0,1]Pu([−K+ 1, K−1]c).

Applying (176) tog, we have lim

n→∞ sup

u[0,1]

g(x)Pu,n(dx)

g(x)Pu(dx) = 0.

Combining all the obtained estimates, we have

nlim→∞ sup

u[0,1]

f(x)Pu,n(dx)

f(x)Pu(dx)

2c sup

u[0,1]Pu([−K+ 1, K−1]c).

SinceKis arbitrary and the left hand side is independent ofK, we can letK→ ∞to find, by tightness assumption, that the right hand sid converges to 0, hence (176) holds.

Finally we prove (145).

PutK = sup

x,u

ρu(x). By assumption, K <∞. Denote the Lebesgue measure byµ. On R, any open set can be written as an increasing limit of a sequence of closed sets, and any closed set can be written as a decreasing limit of a sequence of open sets. Therefore, for any( >0, there exists a closed setF and a open setG, satsfyingF ⊂A0⊂A⊂A¯⊂Gand

µ(G)−(/K < µ( ¯A) (=P(A) =)µ(A0)< µ(F) +(/K, u∈[0,1].

Therefore we have

Pu(G)−( < Pu( ¯A) (=P(A) =)P(A0)< P(F) +(, u∈[0,1].

Define a bounded continuous functionf such that f(x)



= 0, x∈Gc,

[0,1], x∈G∩A¯c, 1, x∈A,¯ is satisfied. Then (176) implies

lim

n

inf

u[0,1](Pu(A)−Pu,n(A))lim

n

inf

u[0,1](Pu(G)−Pu,n(A)−()

lim

n

inf

u[0,1](

f(x)Pu(dx)

f(x)Pu,n(dx)−()

=lim

n sup

u[0,1](

f(x)Pu,n(dx)

f(x)Pu(dx))−(

=−(.

Since( >0 is arbitrary,

lim

n

inf

u[0,1](Pu(A)−Pu,n(A))0.

We can repeat the argument by takingF andA0 in place ofGand ¯Ato find lim

n

inf

u[0,1](Pu,n(A)−Pu(A))0. Therefore, for any( >0, by choosing sufficiently largen, we have

inf

u[0,1](Pu(A)−Pu,n(A)) +(0 sup

u[0,1]

(Pu(A)−Pu,n(A))−(.

This implies

sup

u[0,1]|Pu(A)−Pu,n(A)|(, which implies (145).

定理80 の証明. We basically repeat the idea of proof in [4, Theorem XI.3] forsandu. PutD={s∈C|

|s| < C}, and letK ⊂D be a compact set and ! be a Jordan curve in D surroundingK, such that d, the distance between! andK, is positive. Similarly, let!1 be a Jordan curve inU surrounding [0,1], such that d1, the distance between!1 and [0,1], is positive. Applying Cauchy’s formula twice, we have, for (s, u)∈K×[0,1],

gn,u(s) = -

gn,u(σ) 2π√

1(σ−s) = -

-

1

gn,υ(σ) 2π√

1(υ−u)

2π√

1(σ−s).

Hence for (s, u), (s, u)∈K×[0,1],

|gn,u(s)−gn,u(s)| -

-

1

|gn,υ(σ)||υ−u||s−s|+|σ−s||u−u|

|υ−u||σ−s||υ−u||σ−s| dυ dσ (2π)2. By (140) we see that, for (σ, υ)∈!×!1,

|gn,υ(σ)|C+MC2 LetLandL1be the length of!and!1, respectively, and putC1= sup

u∈U|u|<∞. Then, noting sup

σ, sK|σ− s|dand sup

υ1, u[0,1]|υ−u|du, we have

|gn,u(s)−gn,u(s)|LL1(C+MC2 )(2C1|s−s|+ 2C|u−u|) (2πdd1)2 .

The coefficients of |s−s| and |u−u| in the right hand side is independent of n, u, u, s, s, which implies that {gn,·| n = 1,2,3,· · ·}is equicontinuous on [0,1]. The Ascoli-Arzel`a theorem implies that for any subsequence of{gn,·}, there exists subsubsequence which converges uniformly on[0,1].

By 定理74 we know that the limit isgu(s), which, in particular, is independent of subsequences. Hence

nlim→∞gn,u(s) =gu(s), uniformly in (s, u) on [0,1].

81 の証明. For each n, u, and s, put gn,u(s) = logGn,u(s) . Then (148) implies (139). Note that Gn,u(0) = 1, hence gn,u(0) = 0 . WithG1,u(0) =1, we also haveg1,u(0) = 1 .

By assumptions,G1,u(s) is regular and non-zero on|s|C0. Henceg1,u(s) =logG1,u(s) is regular on|s|C0.

Put

M1= sup

|s|=C0, u∈U|G1,u(s)1|. By assumption,M1<1 . Then noting that, for|z|<1,

|log(1 +z)| 1

0

z 1 +tz

dt |z| 1− |z|, we have

|g1,u(s)|=|log(1 + (G1,u(s)1))| M1

1−M1, |s|=C0, u∈ U. Therefore

M0= sup

|s|=C0, u∈U|g1,u(s)|<∞. (177) As we have seen, g1,u(s) is regular on |s| C0, and gn,u(0) = 0 and g1,u (0) = 1 . Therefore 1

s

g1,u(s) s 1

is regular on|s|C0, Using Cauchy’s theorem, we find, for|s|C0/2, 1

s

g1,u(s) s 1

= -

|σ|=C0

1 σ

g1,u(σ) σ 1

2π√

1(σ−s)

sup

|s|=C0, u∈U

1 s

g1,u(s) s 1

2πC0

2π(C0−C0/2) 2

C02(M0+C0), where we used (177) in the last line. This implies (138) with M = 2

C02(M0+C0) and C =C0/2. We can apply 定理72 and定理74 to find that there exist positive constantsC and M such that for all n= 1,2,3,· · ·andu∈ U,Gn,u(s) =egn,u(s)is regular and uniformly bounded innandu, on|s|C, and that for eachu∈ U there exists a regular functionGuon|s|< C such that

nlim→∞Gn,u(s) =Gu(s), |s|< C,

uniformly on compact sets. 定理72 and定理74 also imply, by (140) and (142),

| −logGn,u(s)−s|M|s|2, |s|C, u∈ U,

| −logGu(s)−s|M|s|2, |s|< C, u∈ U.

補題 89 |z−1logz||logz|2e|logz|,z∈C. 証明. Integrating d2

dt2(etw1−tw) =w2etw byttwice, we have etw = 1 +tw+w2

t 0

(t−s)eswds.

Puttingt= 1 andw= logz,

|z−1logz||logz|2 1

0 |eslogz|ds|logz|2(1∨eRe(logz))|logz|2e|logz|.

Then notinig

|Gn,u(s)1 +s||Gn,u(s)1logGn,u(s)|+|logGn,u(s) +s|,

and by using補題89 withz=Gn,u(s) for the first term in the right hand side, we see that there exist C>0 andM>0 such that

|Gn,u(s)1 +s|M|s|2, |s|C, n= 1,2,3,· · ·, u∈ U, and similar uniform estimate forGu.

LetU be a bounded open complex neighborhood of [0,1], andG1,u(s) be regular inu∈ U for eachs.

LetK⊂ {s∈C| |s|< C} be a compact set.

補題 90 |ez−ez||z−z|e|z|+|z|,z, zC. 証明. Put f(t) =z+ (z−z)t. Then

ez−ez= 1

0

d

dtef(t)dt= (z−z) 1

0

ef(t)dt, hence

|ez−ez||z−z| sup

0t1

e|(1t)z+tz||z−z|e|z|+|z|

Since (147) implies that G1,u(s) = 0 for each u ∈ U and s C satisfying |s| C0, g1,u(s) =

logG1,u(s) is regular inu∈ U for eachs. Applying定理80, we see that the convergence ofgn,u(s) to gu(s) is uniform in (s, u)∈K×[0,1].

Using補題90 withz=−gu(s) andz=−gn,u(s), we have

|Gn,u(s)−Gu(s)||gu(s)−gn,u(s)|e|gu(s)|+|gn,u(s)|.

Note that gn,u(s) and gu(s) are bounded uniformly ins, u,n. Therefore the convergence of Gn,u(s) to

Gu(s) is uniform in (s, u)∈K×[0,1].

定理82 の証明. The statements on the generating functions in the neighborhood of 0 are direct conse- quences of系81. 系81 and定理78 implies thatPn,u converges weakly asn→ ∞to a Borel probability measure Pu supported on non-negative reals. 定理74 and 定理78 imply that the generating function Gu(s) ofPu is defined both onRe(s)0and in a neighborhood of 0, and satisfies the defining equations Gu(0) =1 and (149) in a neighborhood of 0 .

IfRe(s)0then|Gu(s)|1, leading to

Re(−λulogGu(su)) =−λulog|Gu(su)|0,

andG1,u(s) is regular onRe(s)>0and continuous onRe(s)0, hence uniqueness of analytic contin- uation implies that (149) holds also onRe(s)0. Similarly, if Re(s)0then |Gn,u(s)|1, leading to

Re(−λulogGn,u(su))0,

hence uniqueness of analytic continuation implies that (148) holds also onRe(s)0.

5Thus we have the corresponding uniform estimates stated in the theorem. Tightness of the family of the corresponding measures is a direct consequence of (151) and命題76.

定理78 also implies that

nlim→∞Gn,u(s) =Gu(s), uniformly on{s∈C| |s|< C or Re(s)0}.

The claim of the uniformity of convergence ofGn,u(s) toGu(s) in (s, u) is also a direct consequence of系81.

Assume thatRe(s) 0 and |s| < λC. Using (148) and (149), which we have proved above to hold forRe(s)0,

Gn+1,u(s)−Gu(s) =G1,u(−λulogGn,u(s/λu))−G1,u(−λulogGu(s/λu)). (178) The assumption 1 =−G1,u(0) =

[0,)

ξP1,u() implies, with dominated convergence theorem, that G1,u(s) exists and satisfies

|G1,u(s)|=|

[0,)

ξeP1,u()|1, (179)

for anyssatisfyingRe(s)0. (AtRe(s) =0, the direction of differentiation is assumed to be restricted in a natural way.) Let Re(si)0, i= 1,2, and for 0 t 1, putF(t) = s1+t(s2−s1). Note that Re(F(t))0.

|G1,u(s2)−G1,u(s1)|

=|G1,u(F(1))−G1,u(F(0))|= 1

0

d

dt(G1,u(F(t)))dt

=|s2−s1| 1

0

G1,u(F(t))dt |s2−s1|

1

0 |G1,u(F(t))|dt |s2−s1|,

where we used (179) in the last line.

Applying this formula on (178), we have, sup

u[0,1]|Gn+1,u(s)−Gu(s)| sup

u[0,1]

λu sup

u[0,1]|logGn,u(s/λu))logGu(s/λu))|

By assumption,|s/λu|< C, hence we already know (uniform convergence inu) that the right hand side converges to 0 asn→ ∞, hence the left hand side also does, implying uniform convergence inu∈[0,1]

ofGn,u(s) to Gu(s) forssatisfyingRe(s)0and|s|< λC.

We can repeat the argument inductively to conclude the uniform convergence for each s satisfying Re(s)0.

We will now move on to a proof of continuity ofPuinu. Assume thatU is a topological space,u∈ U,

ulimu0G1,u(s) =G1,u0(s) uniformly on|s|C0, and lim

uu0λu=λu0.

定理74 implies thatgu=logGu satisfies (141) and (142). In particular, {gu|u∈ U}is uniformly bounded, hence is a normal family on |s| < C. Then for any sequence in U converging to u0, there exists a subsequenceun,n= 1,2,3,· · ·, such thatgu

n converges uniformly on compact sets in|s|< C to a regular functionhdefined on|s|< C. Lettingu=un→u0 in (141) and (142),

h(s) =g1,u0(λu0h(s/λu0)), |s|< C, (180) and

|h(s)−s|M|s|2, |s|< C. (181) 定理74 implies thath=gu0, hence, in particular,his independent of the subsequence{un}. This proves

nlim→∞gu

n(s) =gu0(s), |s|< C,

uniformly on compact sets. 定理78 then implies that for any sequence{un} inU converging tou0, Pun converges weakly toPu0 asn→ ∞.

LetA⊂Rbe a Borel set, satisfyingPu0(∂A) = 0 . Then we have proved that lim

n→∞Pun(A) =Pu0(A) for any sequence satisfying lim

n→∞un =u0. This implies lim

uu0Pu(A) =Pu0(A). SinceA is an arbitrary Borel set satisfyingPu0(∂A) = 0 , We finally see thatPu converges weakly toPu0 as u→u0.

Since, for any sequenceunconverging to u0,Pu

n converges weakly toPu0, the corresponding charac- teristic function ϕu

n(t) converges toϕu0(t) for each t, which implies continuity of ϕu

n(t) in ufor each

t∈R.

定理84 の証明. The definitions (153) and (154) inductively imply thatxc,u is a fixed point of Φn,ufor all n. The statement on the derivative at the fixed point then inductively follows from (154) and the chain rule.

By definition and assumptions,

1,u(x)< x, 0x < xc,u,

which implies that Φn,u(x) is non-negative and decresing inn. Hence the limit exists in [0, xc,u), while the only solution to Φ1,u(x) =x,x∈[0, xc,u) isx= 0 . Hence (155) holds.

We move on to a proof of (156). Since Φ1,u(x) =

k=2

ck,uxk is continuous inx∈[0, ru), so is R(x) =

k=3

ck,uxk3=x31,u(x)−c2,ux2). (182) Therefore lim

x0R(x) =R(0) =c3,u, which, with (155) implies

nlim→∞Rn,u(x)) =c3,u, 0x < xc,u. (183) Let 0x < xc,u. Applying (182) to (154),

log(c2,uΦn+1,u(x))2 log(c2,uΦn,u(x)) = log(1 + Φn,u(x)Rn,u(x))/c2,u), n= 1,2,3,· · ·. Iterating,

log(c2,uΦn+m,u(x))2mlog(c2,uΦn,u(x)) = m k=1

2mklog(1 + Φn+k1,u(x)Rn+k1,u(x))/c2,u), m= 0,1,2,· · ·, n= 1,2,3,· · ·,

which can easily be checked by induction on m. This proves that 2nmlog(c2,uΦn+m,u(x))2n(log(c2,uΦn,u(x)) + sup

kn

Φk,u(x)Rk,u(x))/c2,u), m= 0,1,2,· · ·, n= 1,2,3,· · ·.

(155) implies that the right hand side is negative for sufficiently largen. Therefore

nlim→∞log Φn(x) = lim

m→∞2nmlog(c2,uΦn+m,u(x))<0.

定理85 の証明. (i) Note that Φn,u(xc,u) =xc,u. Then the right hand side of (152) withzreplaced by Φn,u(z) converges for|z|xc,u. By induction, the McLaurin expansion of Φn,u(z) has finite radius of convergence. Put

Φn,u(z) = k=0

cn,kzk. (184)

Then

Gn,u(s) = k=0

cn,kxkc,u1eskλ−n.

Φn,u(xc) = xc impliesGn,u(0) = 1, which implies that a measure Pn,u on {kλn |k = 0,1,2,· · ·}

defined by

Pn,u({kλn}) =cn,kxkc,u1, k= 0,1,2,· · ·, is a Borel probability measure, and that Gn,u is its generating function.

(ii) As noted in命題83, (146) holds withλ2 .

By definitions ofxc,u andλuwith (157), we see thatG1,u(0) = 1 andG1,u(0) =1 . The recursion relation (148) also follows directly from (157) and (154).

Note that, by 命題83, ru and xc,u are continuous in u. Since by assumptions |Φ1,u(z)1| is continuous on a compact set{(u, z)∈U ׯ C| |z| 12(xc,u+ru)}, it is uniformly continuous. Since Φ1,u(z) is finite on |z| 12(xc,u+ru), it is regular there. So for sufficiently smallC0, (147) and regularity holds. This proves all the assumptions in系81 (except those assumed at the end of系81 as additional assumptions), hence the assumptions in 定理82.

(iii) 定理82 implies thatGu(s) =

ePu() is regular ats= 0 and satisfies

| −logGu(s)−s|M|s|2, |s|< C, u∈ U,

for positive constantsMandC. This implies that the meanmu= 1 and the variancevuM (<∞).

To prove that vu > 0, assume otherwise. Then Pu({1}) = 1, hence Gu(s) = es. According to 定理82,Gusatisfies (149), which, combined with (157), becomes

xc,uGu(u) = Φ1,u(xc,uGu(s)).

Therefore

xc,ueu = Φ1,u(xc,ues),

in a neighborhood of s= 0, which is impossible because of the assumptions to the coefficients of Φ1,u(z) in the definition of Φ1,u.

Using (149) and (157) again, withϕu(t) =Gu(−√

1t), we have ϕu(λut) = 1

xc,u

Φ1,u(ϕu(t)xc,u). (185)

With (152), we have

u(λut)|

k=0

ck,uu(t)|kxkc,u1

= k=2

ck,uu(t)|kxkc,u1=u(t)|2 k=2

ck,uu(t)|k2xkc,u1 u(t)|2 1

xc,u

k=2

ck,uxkc,u=u(t)|2 1 xc,u

k=0

ck,uxkc,u=u(t)|2 1 xc,u

Φ(xc,u)

=u(t)|2,

where we used c1,u=c2,u= 0, non-negativity ofck,u’s, and u(t)|1 . Therefore, all the assumptions in the 定理65 hold.

定理87 の証明. (i) 定理82 and the existence of density functionρin定理65 imply that

|

R

eCξρu(ξ)dξ|1 +C+MC2, u∈ U. Sinceρis continuous this implies

sup

ξReCξρu(ξ)<∞, u∈ U.

(ii) Using (185) and (152) and the existence of continuous densityρu, we have

λu1ρu(λu1ξ)c2,uxc,uρu∗ρu(ξ) +c3,ux2c,uρu∗ρu∗ρu(ξ), (186)

where ρuk is thek-fold convolution ofρu.

By assumption, the second term in the right hand side of (186) is positive andλu >2 . By same reasoning as λu 2, there is a positive term in the right hand side, say at k=k0, with k0 > λ.

LetA [0,∞) be the support ofρu. Since mean is 1, there exists x0 ∈A\ {0}. Then (186) and continuity of ρ implies that 2

λux0 ∈A, and by induction, 2

λu n

x0 ∈A, n= 1,2,3,· · ·, leading to 0 A. Then u1x0 ∈A, k= 0,1,2,· · ·, k0, and by induction un ∈A, k = 0,1,2,· · ·, kn0, n= 1,2,3,· · ·. This impliesA= [0,∞). Soρ(ξ)>0 for dense points in [0,∞). But then (186) and continuity ofρimply thatρ(ξ)>0 for allξ >0 .

(iii) 補題 91 For eachu, there existsn0,u,Mu>0,Cu>0, and au, such that

n,u(t)| Cu

xc,ueMu(|t|/au)log 2/logλu, |t| ∈[auλu1, auλnun0,u], nn0,u. (187) 証明. Note that (156) implies that if 0x < xc,u, then there existCu>0 andMu>0 such that

Φn,u(x)< CueMu2n, n0. (188) Since dominated convergence theorem implies that ϕu(t) is continuous, 系64 implies that there exist a >0 andt1 satisfyinga/λ|t1|asuch that

sup

auu|t|au

u(t)|=u(t1)|<1.

Usingϕu(t) =Gu(−√

1t), and noting that lim

n→∞Gn,u(s) =Gu(s) uniformly inson a neghborhood of 0, and then using (157), we see that there exist ( >0 andn0,usuch that

|Φn,u(xc,ue1λ−nu t)|< xc,u−(, nn0,u, au/λ|t|au. (189) The two estimates (188) and (189) imply, for m0 andNn0,uandau/λ|t|au,

|ΦN+m,u(xc,ue1λ−Nu t)|=|Φm,uN,u(xc,ue1λ−Nu t))|Φm,u(|ΦN,u(xc,ue1λ−Nu t)|) Φm,u(xc,u−()CueMu2m.

(190) Let|t| ∈[auλu1, auλnun0,u], and choosemsuch thatau/λ|t|λm< au. Then 0mn−n0,u. Put, in (190),N =n−mn0,u andt=m. Then noting that

ϕn,u(t) = 1

xc,uΦn,u(xc,ue1λ−nt),

we have (187) from (190).

We proceed with a proof of (159). Put

˜

ϕn,u(t) =

R

e1ξtPn,u∗gn(ξ)=

e1ξtgn(ξ−η)Pn,u().

Then Fubini’s theorem implies

˜

ϕn,u(t) =e12t2h2nϕn,u(t).

For a set A define χA byχA(t) = 1, if t ∈A, and 0 otherwise. Then 補題91 implies a following bound uniform inn:

[0,auλn−nu 0,u](|t|) ˜ϕn,u(t)||χ

[0,auλn−nu 0,u](|t|)ϕn,u(t)|1 Cu

xc,ueMu(|t|/au)log 2/logλu, t∈R. Therefore, dominated convergence theorem implies

nlim→∞

[0,a

uλn−n0,u](|t|) ˜ϕn,u(t)−ϕu(t)|dt= 0.

On the other hand,

nlim→∞

[0,a

uλn−n0,u](|t|) ˜ϕn,u(t)−ϕ˜n,u(t)|dt lim

n→∞2

auλn−n0,u

eh2nt22dt

lim

n→∞2au2λnu0,u2b2λnun1exp(−a2uλu2n0,ub2n/2) = 0, ifb >

2 logλu

au λnu0,u. Therefore we have

nlim→∞

˜n,u(t)−ϕu(t)|dt= 0,

which implies that the Fourier transform ofPn,u∗gn(ξ) converges inL1 to that ofρu(ξ). Therefore (159) holds.

(iv) Since

u(t)−ϕu(t)||ϕu(t)−ϕu(t)|+u(t)−ϕu(t)|, t, t R, u, u∈ U, it is sufficient to prove thatϕu(t) is

(a) continuous intuniformly inu∈ U, and (b) continuous inufor eacht∈R.

(a) As we have noted before,

[0,)

ξPu() =mu= 1, hence

u(t)−ϕu(t)|

[0,)|2 sinξ(t−t)

2 |Pu()|t−t|

[0,)

ξPu() =|t−t|, which implies thatϕu(t) is continuous intuniformly inu∈ U.

(b) As we noted above,ru andxc,u are continuous inu, by命題83, and Φ1,u(z) is continuous on {(u, z)∈U ׯ C | |z| < ru}, hence uniformly continuous on a compact set {(u, z) U ׯ C|

|z| 12(xc,u+ru)}. Also by definition (157),

G1,u(s) =xc,u1Φ1,u(es/λuxc,u).

Hence G1,u(s) is uniformly continuous on (u, s) [0,1]× {|s| C0} for a positive constant C0. In particular, it is continuous inu∈[0,1], uniformly inson|s|C0.

Note also that by 命題83,λu is continuous inu.

We have proved that the additional assumptions in the last part of 定理82 hold. Therefore, by the last statement in定理82,ϕu(t) is continuous inufor eacht∈R.

(v) As we noted before, 定理82 implies that for family of measures Pu, u∈ U, the mean mu= 1 and the variance sup

u∈UvuM(<∞). With命題76 we further have uniform bound of moments to all order. We also know by命題86 that infu[0,1]vu>0 . These facts are sufficient to proveu-uniform decay estimate 定理63. As we have proved already,ϕu(t) is continuous in (u, t)[0,1]×R. Then 定理66 implies the claim.

C 指数型の Tauber 型定理.

この節は確率論講義録[17]とregular.tex [19] (§Bに引用)に入れるべき内容60だが,講義録執筆時点で入 れ損なっている61ので,ここに [40]の主結論のみ挟んでおく.

6020010105–06;12–17.

61時間がない!

ドキュメント内 数理物理学 - Random walk と self-avoiding walk (ページ 90-106)