でもよいかも知れない83)．
だが，これはあまり適切な用語ではないように思われる．第一に，相互作用という概念 がそれ自体混乱している．第二に，○○属性という名称で統一することによる統一性には 見かけだけのものであり，実質がない．
相互作用には異なる二つのレベルがあり，これらの混同は，しばしば大きな概念上の混 乱の元凶となっている．今，知覚体a,被知覚体x,被知覚体 yがあり，x, yが相互作用し 関係 R(x, y)が成立しているとする．相互作用という用語を使った場合，これが Rのこ とをさすのか，メタ関係R0(a, R) のことをさすのか曖昧である．多くの研究はこのこと に無自覚で，本質的な混乱がしばしば認められる．
更に重要なのは，一次属性，二次属性，. . .，n次属性のような次元とは関係がない，と いう点である．意味役割と意味型の区別は，関係の参与体の数に応じて単調に増え続ける わけではなく，状況依存して定義されるか(意味役割の場合)，状況依存しないで定義され るか(意味型の場合)の二値的な区別しかない．状況の複雑性の度合い (参与項の数)は，
意味役割と意味型の区別には反映されない．これに対し，属性はそのような項数の別を反 映して然るべきである．このような理由から，意味役割の概念を，属性の一種と見なし，
事実を「統一的」に扱うことには，あまり実質がないように私たちには思われる．それは，
分類のための分類でしかなく，意味型と意味役割のあいだの質的な違いを無視する効果に 繋がる．
以上のような理由から，意味役割に関しては，それが属性であるという点にこだわらな い方がよいように思う．実際，属性という用語に固執することは，意味役割の基盤が状況 であるという性質の重要性を見失わせる可能性が高い．
参考文献
Atkins, B. T. S., Rundell, M., and Sato, H. 2003. “The contribution of FrameNet to practical lexicography.”International Journal of Lexicography — Special Issue:
FrameNet and Frame Semantics16(5): 333–357.
Baker, C. F., Fillmore, C. J., and Cronin, B. 2003. “The structure of FrameNet database.” International Journal of Lexicography — Special Issue: FrameNet and Frame Semantics16(5): 281–295.
Baker, C. F., Fillmore, C. J., and Lowe, J. B. 1998. “The Berkeley FrameNet project.”
In COLING-ACL 98, Montreal, Canada: 86–90. Association for the Computa- tional Linguistics.
Barsalou, L. W. 1982. “Ad hoc categories.”Memory & Cognition11: 211–227.
Barsalou, L. W. 1985. “Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as
83) 同様の根拠から，相互作用的属性，自律的属性を複体属性(multiplex attribute)，単体属性(simplex attribute)と呼んでもよいはずだ．
参考文献 81 determinants of graded structure in categories.”Journal of Experimental Psychol- ogy: Learning, Memory, and Cognition11: 629–654.
Barsalou, L. W. 1992. “Frames, concepts, and conceptual fields.”Frames, Fields and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization, ed. by Lehrer, A. and Kittay, E. F. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates. 21–74.
Barwise, J. and Etchemendy, J. 1987. The Liar: An Essay on Truth and Circularity.
Oxford: Oxford University Press. [邦訳: 『うそつき: 真理と循環をめぐる論考』
(金子洋之 訳).産業図書.].
Barwise, J. and Perry, J. 1983.Situations and Attitudes. MIT Press. [邦訳: 『状況と態 度』.土屋俊ほか(訳).産業図書.].
Bernstein, N. A. 1967.The Coordination and Regulation of Movements. Oxford Uni- versity Press.
Bernstein, N. A. 1996. On Dexterity and its Development, ed. by M. Turvey, trans- lated from Russian by M. L. Latash. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum. [邦訳:
『デクステリィー: 巧みさとその発達』.工藤和俊(訳).佐々木正人(監訳).金子書房.].
Blackmore, D. 1992.Understanding Utterances: An Introduction to Pragmatics. Black-
well. [邦訳: 『ひとは発話をどう理解するか』 (武内道子・山崎英一 訳). ひつじ書
房].
Coad, P. and Yourdon, E. 1991.Objected-Oriented Design. Prentice-Hall.
Coleman, L. and Kay, P. 1981. “Prototype semantics: The English verb lie.” Lan- guage57: 26–44.
Coulson, S. 2001.Semantic Leaps: Frame-Shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction. Cambridge University Press.
Cruse, D. A. 1995. “Polysemy and related phenomena from a cognitive linguistic viewpoint.”Computational Lexical Semantics, ed. by Saint-Dizier, P. and Viegas, E. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 33–49.
Cruse, D. A. 1999. Micro-structure of word meanings. Polysemy: Theoretical and Computational Approaches, ed. by Ravin, Y. and Leacock, C. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 30–51.
Duncker, K. 1945.On Problem Solving. (Psychological Monographs, 58 (270)).
Elman, J. L. 1992. “Grammatical structure and distributed representations.”Con- nectionism: Theory and Practice, ed. by Davis, S. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 138–178. [Reprinted in Geirsson, H. and Losonsky, M. (eds.), Readings in Language and Mind: 526–558. Basil Blackwell].
Elman, J. L., Bates, E. A., Johnson, M. H., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Parisi, D., and Plun- kett, K. 1996.Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [邦訳: 『認知発達と生得性: 心はどこから来るのか』
参考文献 82 (乾敏郎・山下博士・今井むつみ訳).共立出版.].
Fauconnier, G. R. 1985. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Fauconnier, G. R. 1997.Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: Cam- bridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G. R. and Turner, M. 1994. Conceptual Projections and Middle Spaces.
(Cognitive Science Technical Report TR-9401), Cognitive Science Department, UCSD.
Fauconnier, G. R. and Turner, M. 1996. “Blending as a central process of grammar.”
Conceptual Structure, Discourse, and Language, ed. by Goldberg, A. D. CSLI Pub- lications.
Fauconnier, G. R. and Turner, M. 1998. “Conceptual integration networks.”Cogni- tive Science22: 133–187.
Fellbaum, C., (ed.) 1998.WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
Fillmore, C. J. 1968. “The case for case.” In Bach, W. and Harms, R. T. (eds.),Uni- versals in Linguistic Theory. New York, Holt, Rinehart and Winston. [Reprinted in Fillmore 2003,Form and Meaning in Language, Vol. 1: Papers on Semantic Roles:
23–122. CSLI Publications.].
Fillmore, C. J. 1971. “Some problems for case grammar.” In O’Brien, R. (ed.),Report of the Twenty-Second Round Table Meeting on Linguistics and Language Studies: 35–
56. Georgetown University Press, Washington, D.C. [Reprinted in R. Dirven and G. Rodden (eds.),Fillmore’s Case Grammar — A Reader: 59–69. Heidelberg:
Julius Groos Verlag].
Fillmore, C. J. 1977. “The case for case reopened.” Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 8:
Grammatical Relations, ed by Cole, P. and Sadock, J. M. Academic Press, New York. 59–82. [Reprinted in Fillmore 2003,Form and Meaning in Language, Vol. 1:
Papers on Semantic Roles: 175–199. CSLI Publications.].
Fillmore, C. J. 1982. “Frame semantics.” Linguistics in the Morning Calm, ed. by Linguistic Society of Korea. 111–137.
Fillmore, C. J. 1985. “Frames and the semantics of understanding.” Quaderni di Semantica6(2): 222–254.
Fillmore, C. J. 2003.Form and Meaning in Language, Vol. 1: Papers on Semantic Roles.
CSLI Publications.
Fillmore, C. J. and Atkins, B. T. S. 1992. “Towards a frame-based lexicon: The semantics of RISK and its neighbors.”Frames, Fields and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization, ed by Lehrer, A. and Kittay, E. F. Lawrence
参考文献 83 Earlbaum Associates. 75–102.
Fillmore, C. J. and Atkins, B. T. S. 1994. “Starting where the dictionaries stop: The challenge for computational lexicography.”Compuational Approaches to the Lex- icon, ed. by Atkins, B. T. S. and Zampoli, A. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
349–393.
Fillmore, C. J. and Atkins, B. T. S. 1999. “Describing polysemy: the case of ‘crawl’.”
Polysemy: Theoretical and Computational Approaches, ed. by Ravin, Y. and Lea- cock, C. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. 91–110.
Fillmore, C. J., Johnson, C. R., and Petruck, M. R. L. 2003. “Background to FrameNet.” International Journal of Lexicography — Special Issue: FrameNet and Frame Semantics16(5): 235–250.
Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P., and O’Connor, K. 1988. “Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone.”Language64(3): 501–538.
Fillmore, C. J., Wooters, C., and Baker, C. F. 2001. “Building a large lexical data- bank which provides deep semantics.”Proceedings of the Pacific Asian Conference on Language, Information and Computation.
Gentner, D. 1983. “Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy.”Cog- nitive Science7: 155–170.
Gentner, D. and Clement, C. 1988. “Evidence for relational selectivity in the inter- pretation of analogy and metaphor.”The Psychology of Learning and Motivation 22: 307–358.
Gibson, J. J. 1979.Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Lawrence Earlbaum As- sociates. [邦訳: 『生態学的視覚論』.古崎ほか(訳).サイエンス社.].
Glucksberg, S. and Keysar, B. 1990. “Understanding metaphorical comparisons:
Beyond similarity.”Psychological Review97: 3–18.
Glucksberg, S. and Keysar, B. 1993. “How metaphors work.” Metaphor and Thought, ed. by Ortony, A. Cambridge University Press, 2nd Edition.
Glucksberg, S., McGlone, M. S., and Manfredi, D. A. 1997. “Property attribution in metaphor comprehension.”Journal of Memory and Language36: 50–67.
Goffman, E. 1974.Frame Analysis. New York: Harper.
Goffman, E. 1978. “Response cries.”Language54: 787–815. [Reprinted in Goffman 1981: 78–123].
Goffman, E. 1979. “Footing.”Semiotica25: 1–29. [Reprinted in Goffman 1981: 124–
159].
Goffman, E. 1981.Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Goldberg, A. D. 1995.Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. University of Chicago Press.
参考文献 84 Grady, J. 1997a. Foundations of Meaning: Primary Metaphors and Primary Scenes.
Ph. D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
Grady, J. 1997b. “THEORIES ARE BUILDINGS revisited.” Cognitive Linguistics 8(4):
267–290.
Grady, J. 1999. “A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: Correlation vs. resemblance.”Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by Gibbs, R. and Steen, G. John Benjamins.
Grice, P. 1968. “Logic and conversation.”Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, ed. by Cole, P. and Morgan, J. Academic Press.
Harder, P. 1999. “Partial autonomy: Ontology and methodology in cognitive linguistics.” Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope, and Methodology, ed. by Janssen, T. and Redeker, G. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. 195–222.
Holyoak, K. and Thagard, P. 1994.Mental Leaps: Analogy in Creative Thought. Cam- bridge, MA: MIT Press. [邦訳: 『アナロジーの力』(鈴木宏昭・河原哲雄 訳).新曜 社.].
Holyoak, K. J., Junn, E. N., and Billman, D. O. 1984. “Development of analogical problem-solving skill.”Child Development55: 2042–2055.
Jackendoff, R. S. 1990.Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Johnson, M. 1987.Body in the Mind. University of Chicago Press.
Kolodner, J. L., (ed.) 1993a. Case-Based Learning. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Press. [Reprint ofMachine Learning10 (3), 1993].
Kolodner, J. L., (ed.) 1993b. Case-Based Reasoning. San Francicso, CA: Morgan Kauffman.
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things. University of Chicago Press.
[邦訳: 『認知意味論』(池上 嘉彦・河上 誓作 訳).紀伊国屋書店.].
Lakoff, G. 1991. “The invariance hypothesis: Is the abstract reasoning based on image schemas?” Cognitive Linguistics1(1): 39–74. [邦訳: 不変性仮説: 抽象推論 はイメージ・スキーマに基づくか? (杉本孝司訳). In坂原 茂(編),『認知言語学の発 展』: 1–59.ひつじ書房.].
Lakoff, G. 1993. “Contemporary theory of metaphor.” Metaphor and Thought, ed.
by Orthony, A. Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition. 202–251.
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. [邦訳: 『レトリックと人生』(渡部昇一ほか 訳).大修館.].
Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1999.The Philosophy in the Flesh. Basic Books.
Lakoff, G. and Turner, M. 1989. More than Cool Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. [邦訳: 『詩と認知』(大堀壽夫 訳).紀伊国屋書店.].
Langacker, R. W. 1987.Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1: Theoretical Prereq-
参考文献 85 uisites. Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. 1991.Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 2: Descriptive Appli- cations. Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. 2000.Grammar and Conceptualization. Mouton de Gruyter.
Lave, J. and Wenger, E. 1991.Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
Oxford University Press. [邦訳:『状況に埋め込まれた学習: 正統的周辺参加』(佐 伯胖 訳).産業図書.].
Leake, D. B. (ed.) 1996.Case-Based Reasoning: Experiences, Lessons, and Future Direc- tions. AAAI Press/MIT Press.
Luria, A. R. 1986. The Mind of a Mnemonist: A Little Book about a Vast Memory.
Harvard University Press.
Mandler, J. 1984.Stories, Scripts, and Scenes: Aspects of Schema Theory. Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
McCarthy, J. and Hayes, P. J. 1969. Some philosophical problems from the stand- point of Artificial Intelligence. Machine Intelligence 4, ed. by Meltzer, B. and Michie, D. Edinburgh University Press. 463–502.
McCawley, J. D. 1985. Speech acts and Goffman’s participant roles.Proceedings of the 1st Eastern States Conference on Linguistics: 260–274.
McCawley, J. D. 1998.The Syntactic Phenomena in English, 2nd edition. University of Chicago Press.
McClelland, J., Rumelhart, D., and The PDP Research Group 1986. Parallel Dis- tributed Processing, Vol. 2. MIT Press.
McGlone, M. S. and Manfredi, D. A. 2001. “Topic-vehicle interaction in metaphor comprehension.”Memory & Cogntion29: 1209–1219.
Medin, D. L. and Shaffer, M. M. 1978. “Context theory of classification learning.”
Psychological Review85: 207–238.
Michaelis, L. A. and Ruppenhofer, J. 2001. Beyond Alternations: A Constructional Model of the German Applicative Pattern. CSLI Publications, Stanford.
Minsky, M. L. 1975. “A framework for representing knowledge.”The Psychology of Computer Vision, ed. by In Winston, P. H. McGraw-Hill. 211–277.
Morris, M. W. and Murphy, G. L. 1990. “Converging operations on a basic level in event taxonomies.”Memory and Cognition18: 407–418.
Murphy, G. L. 2002.The Big Book of Concepts. MIT Press.
Nosofsky, R. M. 1984. “Choice, similarity, and context theory of classification.”
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition10: 104–114.
Ohara, K. H., Fujii, S., Ohori, T., Suzuki, R., Saito, H., and Ishizaki, S. 2004. “The Japanese FrameNet project: An introduction.” Proceedings of LREC-04 Satel-
参考文献 86 lite Workshop “Building Lexical Resources from Semantically Annotated Corpora”
(LREC 2004): 9–11.
Ohara, K. H., Fujii, S., Sato, H., Ishizaki, S., Ohori, T., and Suzuki, R. 2003. The Japanese FrameNet project: A preliminary report.Proceedings of PACLING ’03:
249–254.
Pagano, C. C. and Turvey, M. T. 1993. “Perceiving by dynamic touch the distances reachable with irregular objects.”Ecological Psychology5: 551–568.
Pansky, A. and Koriat, A. 2004. “The basic level convergence effect in memory distortions.”Psychological Science15: 52–59.
Petruck, M. R. L. 1996. “Frame semantics.” Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. by Ver- shueren, J., Ostman, J.-O., and Blommaert, J. John Benjamins.
Pilkington, A. 1990. “A relevance-theoretic view of metaphor.” Parlance 2: 102–
117.
Pustejovsky, J. 1991. “The generative lexicon.”Computational Linguistics17(4): 409–
440.
Pustejovsky, J. 1995.The Generative Lexicon. MIT Press.
Pustejovsky, J. and Boguraev, B. 1994. “A richer characterization of dictionary en- tries: The role of knowledge representation.” Computational Approaches to the Lexicon, ed. by Atkins, B. T. S. and Zampolli, A. Oxford University Press, Ox- ford. 295–311.
Pustejovsky, J. and Bouillon, P. 1996. “Aspectual coercion and logical polysemy.”
Lexical Semantics: The Problem of Polysemy, ed. by Pustejovsky, J. and Boguraev, B. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 133–162.
Reed, E. S. 1996.Encountering the World: Towards an Ecological Psychology. Oxford University Press. [邦訳: 『アフォーダンスの心理学』.細田直哉(訳).新曜社.].
Rosch, E. and Mervis, C. B. 1975. “Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories.”Cognitive Psychology7: 573–605.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W., Johnson, D., and Boyes-Braem, P. 1976. “Basic objects in natural categories.”Cognitive Psychology8: 382–439.
Rumelhart, D., McClelland, J., and The PDP Research Group 1986. Parallel Dis- tributed Processing, Vol. 1. MIT Press.
Schank, R. C. and Abelson, R. P. 1977.Scripts, Goals, Plans and Understanding. Hills- dale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Smith, E. E. and Medin, D. L. 1981. Concepts and Categories. Harvard University Press.
Solomon, H. Y. and Turvey, M. T. 1988. “Haptically perceiving the distance reach- able with hand-held objects.”Journal of Experimetal Psychology: Human Percep-
参考文献 87 tion and Performance14: 404–427.
Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. 1995.Relevance: Communication and Cognition, 2nd edi- tion. Blackwell.
Sweetser, E. E. 1987. The definition oflie.Cultural Models in Language and Thought, ed. by Holland, D. and Quinn, N. Cambridge University Press. 43–66.
Tesni´ere, L. 1959. El´ements de Syntaxe Structurale. Paris: C. Klincksieck. [2nd edi- tion was published in 1966].
Turvey, M. T. 1996. “Dynamic touch.”American Psychologist54(11): 1134–1152.
Van Valin, Jr., R. D. and Wilkins, D. P. 1996). “The case for ‘effector’: case roles, agents, and agency revisited.”Grammatical Constructions: Their Form and Mean- ing, ed. by Shibatani, M. and Thompson, S. A. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 289–322.
Zacks, J. M. and Tversky, B. 2001. “Event structure in perception and conception.”
Psychological Bulletin127: 3–21.
古牧 久則2004.「共起関係による「名詞」のフレーム構造に対する一考察」. (京都言語 学コロキアム(Kyoto Linguistics Colloquium)での口頭発表(02/28/2004)).
長谷 陽一郎2004.「コンピュータ・アナロジー再考: 認知言語学とオブジェクト指向の 観点から」.『日本認知言語学会第5回記念大会Conference Handbook』: 53–56.
日本認知言語学会(JCLA).
井口 厚夫2000.「計算機用日本語生成辞書IPAL (SURFACE/DEEP)」.口頭発表,第19 回IPA技術発表会.
IPA. 1997. 「ソフトウェア文書のための日本語処理の研究13: IPALの統合化に向け
て」. Technical report,情報処理振興事業協議会センター.
人工知能学会1992.『人工知能学会誌: 特集「事例ベース推論」』Vol. 7, No. 14.
情報通信研究機構2003.『EDR電子化辞書仕様説明書』. [http://www2.crl.go.jp/
kk/e416/EDR/J_index.html].
影山 太郎1996.『動詞意味論: 言語と認知の接点』.くろしお出版. 影山 太郎(編) 2001.『日英対照: 動詞の意味と構文』.大修館.
金丸 敏幸2004.「副詞的表現が表す話者の態度について: 認知言語学の観点から」.『日 本語用論学会第7回(2004年度)大会予稿集』: 25–28.日本語用論学会.
河原 大輔・黒橋 禎夫2002.「用言と直前の格要素の組を単位とする格フレームの自動 獲得」.『自然言語処理』9(1): 1–16.
黒田 航 2004. 「“(意味)フレーム”という説明概念の再規定: FOCAL を知的に衛生 的な枠組みにするために」. [未発表論文: http://clsl.hi.h.kyoto-u.ac.jp/
~kkuroda/papers/revising-the-frame-concept.pdf].
黒田 航・井佐原 均 2004a. 「意味フレームを用いた知識構造の言語への効果的な結 びつけ」. 『電子情報通信学会技術研究報告』Vol. 104 (416): 65–70. 電子情報通