• 検索結果がありません。

インド哲学仏教学研究 25(201703) 003内田 みどり「仏教における自殺の意味 : Delhey論文に対する一考察 」

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "インド哲学仏教学研究 25(201703) 003内田 みどり「仏教における自殺の意味 : Delhey論文に対する一考察 」"

Copied!
13
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)25, 2017. 3. Delhey. 2500 de La Vallée Poussin [1922]. Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics. Delhey. Delhey [2006] Saṃyutta-nikāya. Godhika1, Vakkali2, Channa3. Delhey Delhey [2009] Delhey [2009]. Delhey [2009]. Delhey 4. Vakkali. Delhey. 5. Delhey [2009] Saṃyutta-nikāya 6. Delhey. 7. [2006] Godhika Vakkali Channa. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7. S I 120–122. Godhika. S III 119–124. Vakkali. S IV 55–60. Channa. Delhey [2009: 71]. Delhey [2009: 71]. T 2 346b–347b. T 2 642b–643a.. - 45 -. Vakkali PTS.

(2) Delhey [2009] Delhey [2006]. Delhey [2009]. Saṃyutta-nikāya. Vakkali Delhey. Delhey. Vakkali. 8. Delhey [2009] Delhey [2009]. Delhey [2009]. Saṃyutta-nikāya. Vakkali9. Vakkali Vakkali 2. Vakkali. Delhey Delhey. Vakkali. Buddhaghosa10. Vakkali. Buddhaghosa. Vakkali Delhey. Buddhaghosa. Delhey. Delhey [2009: 82], ‛problematic.’ Delhey [2009: 74–80]. 10 SA II 314: thero kira adhimāniko ahosi. 8 9. “conceited, or ensnared in illusions”. CPD (vol.1, p.136). - 46 -. adhimānika.

(3) 11. Buddhaghosa. Delhey. Vakkali. Buddhaghosa Delhey. Vakkali. Vakkali. Buddhaghosa. 12. Delhey Vakkali Delhey Buddhaghosa Buddhaghosa Delhey Vakkali (a narrator’s voice). Delhey. 13. Delhey. 14. Delhey 11 12 13. 14. Vakkali. Delhey [2009: 79]. Delhey [2009: 80–86]. T 2 741c–742b.. T 25 37a–b.. - 47 -.

(4) Buddhaghosa. Vakkali. Buddhaghosa Delhey Delhey. Delhey. Delhey. 15. Vakkali. Vakkali. Vakkali ,. Delhey (Channa). Delhey. 15. Vakkali. Delhey [2009: 86–89].. - 48 -.

(5) (pūtikāya). Delhey. Saṃyutta-nikāya. 16. Vakkali Delhey. de La Vallee Poussin. Vakkali Vakkali. 17. Vakkali. Delhey Vakkali Vakkali Vakkali Vakkali Delhey. Vakkali. Delhey (content)18. Saṃyutta-nikāya. Saṃyutta-nikāya. Assaji19. (form). Vakkali. Vakkali Delhey Saṃyutta-. nikāya. Assaji. Vakkali Assaji. Assaji. Delhey Vakkali. Assaji. Vakkali Vakkali. 16. S V 320–322. Vesālī. Vin III 68–71 “bhāvitā bahulīkatā mahapphalā hoti mahānisaṁsā”. 17. De La Vallée Poussin [1930]. Delhey [2009: 89]. S III 124–126. Assaji.. M III 82 cattāro satipaṭṭhānā. satta bojjhaṅgā 18 19. Assaji. - 49 -.

(6) (Assaji) Delhey Delhey. Vakkali. Vakkali Vakkali. Godhika Godhika. Delhey. Vakkali Vakkali. Vakkali Godhika. (vijñāna) Godhika. Godhika. Godhika Vakkali. Godhika. Delhey [2009]. Delhey [2009]. 1. Vakkali Vakkali Delhey [2009]. - 50 -. Godhika.

(7) Vakkali 2. Saṃyutta-nikāya. Vakkali. Assaji. Assaji. Vakkali. Delhey Assaji. Vakkali. Assaji. Saṃyutta-nikāya Khandhavagga. (Theravagga). Khandhavagga. Assaji. Vakkali Khema20 Vakkali Assaji. Khema. Anurādha21 Channa22. Channa23 Khandhavagga. Channa. Vakkali. Vakkali. Saṃyutta-nikāya Ⅲ. Vakkali. Book I Khandha-Saṃyutta 2 Majjhima-paññāsa Chapter IV Thera-vagga Catuttha (1) Ānanda― (2) Tissa― (3) Yamaka― (4) Anurādha― (5) Vakkali― (6) Assaji―. 20 21 22 23. S III 126–132. Khema. S III 116–119. Anurādha. S III 132–135. Channa. S IV 55–60. Channa.. Channa Channa. - 51 -.

(8) (7) Khema― (8) Channa― (9), (10) Rāhula― Vakkali. Vakkali Saṃyutta-nikāya 24. 3. Saṃyutta-nikāya Vinaya. Vakkali. Vinaya25. 3. Delhey. Lamotte. [1965]. 26. Vinaya Vakkali Vinaya Vinaya. Delhey. Saṃyutta-nikāya Saṃyutta-nikāya. 27. 3. Vesālī. Vinaya. Saṃyutta-nikāya ānāpāna-saṃyutta. Vinaya. 3. Vesālī Evam bhāvito kho bhikkhave ānāpānasatisamādhi evam bahulīkato santo ceva paṇīto ca asecanako sukho ca vihāro uppannupanne ca pāpake akusale dhamme ṭhānaso antaradhāpeti vūpasametī ti// //28. 24. Saṃyutta-nikāya. 25. Vin III 71–73. Lamotte [1965: 156].. 26. Godhika. SI. Vakkali. S III. Channa. S IV. Vinaya [1964: 230]. 27 28. Vin III 21: saṃghasuṭṭhutāya saṃghaphāsutāya dummañkūnaṃ puggalānaṃ niggahāya pesalānaṃ bhikkūnaṃ phāsuvihārāya diṭṭhadhammikānaṃ āsavānaṃ saṃvarāya samparāyikānaṃ āsavānaṃ paṭighātāya appasannānaṃ pasādāya pasannānaṃ bhiyyobhāvāya saddhammaṭṭhitiyā vinayānuggahāya. S V 320–322. Vesālī. S V 322.. - 52 -.

(9) Saṃyutta-nikāya. ānāpāna-saṃyutta. 10. 9. Vesālī Vinaya. 3. yo pana bhikkhu sañcicca manussaviggahaṃ jīvitā voropeyya satthahārakaṃ vāssa pariyeseyya, ayaṃ pi pārājiko hoti asa ṃvāso ti.29 ,. Vesālī. Delhey. Delhey. (bloody)30. Vakkali. Vinaya Vakkali. Vinaya Delhey Saṃyutta-nikāya. (content)31. (form). Saṃyutta-nikāya. de La Vallée Poussin [1922] Buddhaghosa. Channa. samasīsī samasīsin. 32. Delhey. 29 30 31 32. 33. Vin III 71. Delhey [2009: 80]. Delhey [2009: 89]. SA II 373. Buddhaghosa. samasīsin. (SA I 183–184) i) Iriyāpatha-s.: ii) Roga-s.:. iii) Jīvita-s.: Channa 33. Keown samasīsin. simultaneously attains an end of craving and of life” Delhey [2009: 67].. - 53 -. PED. “literally ‘equal-headed,’ i.e. one who.

(10) Delhey [2009]. CPD. Vakkali. A Critical Pāli Dictionary. V. Trenckner ed. O.v. Hinüber and O.H. Pind. Copenhagen, 1992.. PED. The Pāli Text Society᾽s Pāli-English Dictionary. T. W. Rhys Davids and W. Stede. London: PTS. 1986.. S. Saṃyutta-nikāya 6vols. ed. L. Feer (vol.1–5) and C. A. F. Rhys Davids (vol.6, index). London: PTS. 1884–1904.. SA. Saṃyutta-nikāya-aṭṭhakathā (Sāratthappakāsinī) 3vols. ed. F. L. Woodward. London: PTS. 1929–1937.. T. .. Vin. Vinayapiṭaka 5vols. ed. Hermann Oldenberg. London: PTS. 1969.. VA. Vinayapiṭaka-aṭṭhakathā (Samantapāsādikā). ed. J. Takakusu and M. Nagai. London: PTS. 1927–1969.. Delhey, Martin [2006] “Views on Suicide on Buddhism,” M. Zimmermann (ed.) Buddhism and Violence, Lumbini: Lumbini International Institute. [2009] “Vakkali, A New Interpretation of His Suicide,” Journal of the International College for Postgraduate Buddhist Studies 13. Lamotte, Étienne [1965] “Le Suicide religieux dans le bouddhisme ancient,” Classe des Lettres et des Sciences Morales et Politiques 5, Bruxelles: Academie Royale de Belgique. de La Vallée Poussin, Louis [1922] Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics. vol. XII.. - 54 -.

(11) Woodward, F. L. [1927] The Book of Kindred Sayings (Saṃyutta-Nikāya) or Grouped Suttas. London: The Pali Text Society.. Harvey, Peter [2000] An introduction to Buddhist Ethics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Keown, Damien [1996] “Buddhism and Suicide: The Case of Channa,” Journal of Buddhist Ethics 3. Keown, Damien [1999] “Attitudes to Euthanasia in the Vinaya and Commentary,” Journal of Buddhist Ethics 6. Wiltshire, Martin [1983] “The ‘Suicide᾽ Problem in the Pāli Canon,” Journal of the International Association of Buddhist Studies 6-2. [1967]. .. [1958]. .. [1985]. I. .. [2011]. .. [2002]. ― ― .. [2013]. ―. ― .. [1990]. 6. ,. . [2003]. .. [2009] [2011]. . II. 6. .. 4. .. 3. .. [2008]. I. .. II. . .. [2009]. .. [2010]. .. [2011]. . - 55 -.

(12) [2008]. .. [2011]. Osaka University Knowledge Archive: OUKA, http://ir.library.osaka-u.ac.jp/dspace/. [2010] [1964]. . ―. .. [1970]. .. [1974]. .. [1988]. 10. .. [1988]. 3. [1956]. .. [1993]. .. [1997] [2009] Keywords. Delhey. 2 . Vakkali Saṃyutta-nikāya. - 56 -. , pp. 38–63.. ..

(13) On the view of suicide in Buddhism: A review article on Martin Delhey’s paper UCHIDA, Midori In considering the issue of suicide in Buddhism, a well-known and longstanding topic repeatedly discussed in the history of modern Buddhist studies, it seems now to be most effective to review an article published by Martin Delhey in 2009 with the name “Vakkali: A new interpretation of his suicide.” This paper, in combination with his previous studies, provides not only a pertinent summary of relevant researches conducted up to date but also a new perspective in dealing with the materials relevant to the research of this issue. Main points of his paper can be summarized in three points. Delhey, at first, in taking up three texts that describe the situations about a notorious suicide Vakkali, one in Saṃyutta-nikāya in Pāli literature, another in Saṃyuktāgama and the other in Ekottarikāgama in Chinese translations, pays close attention to the difference attested in these three transmissions of texts. According to Delhey, this difference is to be seen as the reflection of the history in extending descriptions that would have been in need in the interpretation of the death of an arhant, a most complicated issue in Buddhist practice. On the basis of this assumption, Delhey further explores into the relationship among these three traditions of the text of Vakkali, reaching a conclusion that the text in Saṃyutta-nikāya and that in Saṃyuktāgama, which show close similarities in some respects, would have been derived from a common source separate from the genealogy of the text in Ekottarikāgama. In addition to this observation, he finally attracts our attention to the difference in Vakkali and Assaji, both being seriously ill, the former being explicitly stated as having committed suicide while the latter completely lacking the accounts. This difference, he states, would be an indication that Assaji attained his nibbāna through the teaching of the Buddha. Although Delhey [2009] is full of useful suggestions, there still remain several questions. One of the most important issues is the lack of consideration about the difference in context in which each text is located. In dealing with the relevant materials under discussion in more proper manners, it is not sufficient to place a focus on the matter of the interpretation of suicide, but is necessary to pay attention to the specificity of “the contextual position” in which each text is placed, for each text would have received different modifications under the influence of their difference in structure of the matrix. In this respect, it would be open to question to make immediate comparison of Vakkali sutta in the Khandhavagga with Assaji sutta in the Theravagga only by applying the criterion of the moment of attainment of arhatship, for these two vaggas have their own functions.. - 113 -.

(14)

参照

関連したドキュメント

専攻の枠を越えて自由な教育と研究を行える よう,教官は自然科学研究科棟に居住して学

An example of a database state in the lextensive category of finite sets, for the EA sketch of our school data specification is provided by any database which models the

Eskandani, “Stability of a mixed additive and cubic functional equation in quasi- Banach spaces,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol.. Eshaghi Gordji, “Stability

Our guiding philosophy will now be to prove refined Kato inequalities for sections lying in the kernels of natural first-order elliptic operators on E, with the constants given in

Then it follows immediately from a suitable version of “Hensel’s Lemma” [cf., e.g., the argument of [4], Lemma 2.1] that S may be obtained, as the notation suggests, as the m A

[r]

Amount of Remuneration, etc. The Company does not pay to Directors who concurrently serve as Executive Officer the remuneration paid to Directors. Therefore, “Number of Persons”

児童生徒の長期的な体力低下が指摘されてから 久しい。 文部科学省の調査結果からも 1985 年前 後の体力ピーク時から