(228)
JborrnalofIhdian
andBuddhist SindiesVbl.63,No.3,
March2015
Evidence
ofBuddhism
in
15th-Century
Eastern
India:
Clues
from
the
Colophon
ofaKalacakratantra
Manuscript
in
Old
Bengali
Script
HoRi
Shin'ichir6
The
destruction
of the major Buddhist monasteriesin
Eastern
India,includingVikramaSila,
by
TurkicMuslims at thebeginning
of the 13thcentury delivereda majorblow
totheBuddhistinstitutions.Butthis
did
not mark a complete demise ofthe Buddhistfaith
throughouttheIndiansubcontinent. Howlong
and whereBuddhism
continued tosur-vive remain some of the
least
known aspects initshistory.A corpus ofBuddhist
Sanskrit manuscriptsin
Old
Bengali
script,i)dating
according totheircolophons tothe15th
centu-ry,
offersimportant
clues tothese questions.Inorder toascertain the
historical
background,it
is
first
necessary toestablish theirexactdates
on thebasis
of calendrical elementsfbund
in
thecotophons.Kntacakratantra
Among these15th-century
manuscriptsI
shall firstexamine thecolo-phon of the
KZilacakratantra
palrn
leafmanuscriptin
theCambridge
University
Librarycatalogued Add. 1364.Based upon my
investigation
ofthe
original inMarch2014,
folio
2)
128r
including
thecolophonis
transliteratedasfbllows:
r2 yedharmrnfihetuprabhav5hetumtes5m tathEgatohy!avadat*
1
tes5fi=cayoO
niredha evaipv5dimahzaSramai?ah
11
deyadharmmoyarppravaramahiy5n5nuy5yinam11
l!
r3 Srimat'siEkyabhiksuSrijfianaSrikAnEtpyad=atrapupyarptad=bhavatv=Ec5ryopa
O
dhyayamEtfi-pitrp[irvaitgamarpkptvasakalasatvarager=anuttar5samyaksambodhijfianaphalalar4 bh5yeti
11
li
paramabhattaraketyEdirajavaliprtrvavat'gri;O
madvikram5dityadevapad5namm= atitarajye sae 1503bhadrabadi13budhe likhyapir5 teyarp Srimat*SalcyabhiksuSrljfiiinaSrikaih
l
likhiteyarpmagadhadeSiO
yakansatagratnasasanikaka-rarpakEyasthagrijayardniadatteneti1I
kerakigrfimavasthi;r6 tena
Pl
Subham=astuiL
1[
anella saddhammarasalnptena sarvajfiadosodbhavaSitalena1
kleSahalapra-jvalitantarasyalolcasyadul)kharppraSamostunityarpll
li
11
IL
This
manuscript ispart
ofthe collectiongathered
by
DanielWright
(surgeon
totheBrit-ish
Residency
at Kathmandu) inthe KathmanduValley.
According
to theUniversity
Librarystamp on
folio
lr,
it
was acquiredby
the Libraryin
October
l875.
CecilBendall-EvidenceofBuddhism in15th-CenturyEasternIndia
(Sh.
HoRi)(229)
(1883:
iv,xxxvii, 69-70)described
thismanuscript,drawing
attention tothefact
thatit
was written
in
Eastern
Indiain
the
15thcentury(p.
iv)
. Bendall'sreading of the colophonincludes
some mistakes andhe
could not establish the exactdate
of themanuscriptal-though
he
mentions theyear
as 1446(pp.
iv,69) or 1447(p.
xxxvii) CE.
This
manuscript was consultedin
both
of the critical editions of the1vaiacakratantra,
Raghu
Viraand Lokesh Chandra(1966:
18)
andBaneijee
(1985:
ii,
265).Apart
from
its
philologicalvalue, themanuscript hasalso attracted special attention
from
arthistorians
ontheaccount of the miniatures drawn on
both
sides of two wooden covers.Since
Pratapa-ditya
Pal'sarticlegiving
an iconographicdescription
of theminiaturesin
1965,
many arthistorians
have
dealt
with themanuscript3) and regardedit
unanimously asdated
to1446
CE simply by subtraction of
57
from theyear1S03 citedin
theVikrarna
Era.
Date
Inthe case of thismanuscript,it
is,
however,
possibletopinpointits
exactdate
with more
precision
because
its
colophon fbrtunatelyrecords thelunar
month, paksa(lunar
fortnight)
, tithi(lunar
day), and day ofthe week inaddition totheVikrama year1503.r4 Srimadvikrambditya`ievopadanbmm=atitaropesa" 1503 bhadrabadi13budee
intheVikramayear1503,inthedarkfbrtnightofBhadra
[pada]
, on the 13th[tithi]
, Qn WednesdayWhen
converting IndiandatestotheCommon
Era,
one must also takeinto
consideration whether the yeariscited as expired or current(atitalvartamana),
with which month theyear
begins
(i.e.,
the month of Caitraor K5rttika;eaitradilharttikadi) , and whether themonth ends on the new or
fu11
moon(amantaiptir4imanta).
The computerprogrampafi-ciniga developedby MichioYano and
Makoto
Fushimiandbased
upon theSti,yasiddhjntais
anincredibly
helpfu1tool.4)Using
thisprogram,
thefo11owing
possible
equivalents ofthe dateefthis manuscript can
be
calculated.1. IftheVikramayear1503 istakenas a current
(vartama-na)
yearbeginningwith themonthtra
(caitrlldi)
and themonth asending on thefu11moon(parrpimanta)
, thcdateshouSd beSunday, August 1,1445CE2. vartamana, caitriidi, aminta: Tuesday,August 31,1445CE
3. atitrx,caitradi,ptir4imanta1
vartamana, karttikddi,pfir"imdnta:Saturday,August 20,1446CE
4. atjta,caitnEidi, amanta 1
vartama-na, ktirttikadi,amantzx: Monday, September19,1446CE 5. atita,harttikildi,ptir4imanta:Wednesday,August 9,l447CE
(230)
EvidenceofBuddhism in15th-CentiiryEasternIndia(Sh.
HoRi)Among these
6
altematives, only the 5thone givesa satisfactory equivatentfor
theday
oftheweek, namely,
Wednesday.
Inthisway, thedateofthe manuscript canbe
pinpointed
toWednesday, August
9,
1447CE.
Now,
totellthetruth,Franz Kielhorn(1890:
180-181)established the same datethrough the same procedure
in
an articlepublished
as early as1890,
Le.,
only seven yearsafterthepublicationofBendall's Catalogue.Donor
The doner'snarne appears onlines
r3 and r5in
theplural.r3 Srimat*Sakyabhik.suSrijfianaSrikandm
r5 Srimat"Sadyabhiks.uSrijfikenasirikaih.
1
Here the plural
fbrrn
presumably includesonly onepersonal
name,i.e.,
"Jfi5naSri"fo1-lowed
by
the suMx -ka- and conveys anhonorific
sense. Itis
alsopossible
tointerpret
thecompound as "peop)e
headed
by
thevenerable
Buddhist
monk Jfi5naSri"on thebasis
ofthe
Paninian
ruie5.2.78
concerning a personalname with the sufflx -ka-, "saesam
.5)
manih.
Scribe
Liner5 contains the scribe's name: Jayaramadatta.Heheld
the titleSbsanikaka-ra4akayastha and appears to
have
been
an administrativescribe.r5 sdsanikakara"akllyasthasirijayardmadotteneti
Place
On
line
r5,place
names are mentioned:r5 magadhadeglyakansaragrama
thevillage ofKansara inthe region ofMagadha
On
thebasisof theregional name magadhadeSlya, itwould be possibletorestricttheplaceof copying to southem Bihar.Pal
(1965:
103-104) read magaduadeSlyaka-nragrdma andidentifiedthe village as the
present
city ofArrah. But thisidentification
is
based
on hismisreading of the aksara nsa as an independentvowel di
(ct
anindependent
vowel a online
r6).r5-6 kerakegramfivasthitena
Il
resident
in
thevillageofKerakiThisphrase
probably
modifies theprecedingpersonalname Jayaramadatta.The
database
Ihdia
Place
Fincieravailable on theinternetand developedby
thehistorian
Tsukasa
Mizushimais
very convenientfor
searching village names of rnodemIndia.
Thevillage name "Kansar" hasmany candidates,
but
in
thecase of "Kerki," thereare only twe
villages
by
thisnamein
thewhole of India.One
is
the KerkiGi<6fiT
Village
(24e49'41Z'N,
84045'11"E)locatedinthe Guraru C.D.Block,
Gaya
District,BiharState.
The
other isthe-EvidenceofBuddhism in15th-CenturyEastemIndia
(Sh.
HoRi)(231)
Kerki
dwit
Village
(24eO'53"N,
84024'21"E)in
thePankiC.D.Block,
Palamu District,Jhar-khand
State.
We cannotbe
sure thatthe
village name hasremained almost the same fbrthepast550 years
in
spite of allphonological
and social changes, butthe two sites can bere-garded
astentativecandidates.Concluding
Verse
AfterSubham=astu, thecolophon contains a versein
upcu'a'timetre, which corresponds tothelast
stanza oftheRatnfivadZinatattva
in
Kanga
rfakahata'sedition of theRatndvadlinamald.Underlinedpartsshow variant readings.
6)
RatnbvadanatattvaColophonofAdd. 1364
([[lakahata
1954:480.28-29)anena sadtViarmmarasa-mrtena anena saddharmarasamrtena
sarvojfiadosodbhavaSimlenal sarvojnnyabhtisvadvadnnodbhavena
ll
kleSanamptivL'!gtggl!!E!tl'tfft kleSanalaprahvariraturltsu
lokasyachthkharppraSamo stu nityam
11
prql'aLsuduhkhampraSamo Stunityarp11
Botthicaiydvata-ra
I
shouldlike
to establish thedate
of a manuscript ofSantideva's
Bodhicarya-vatara
at theAsiaticSociety,Kolkata,cataleguedG.
8067.According
toHaraPrasadShastri's
description
(1917:
21-22), themanuscriptis
written on palmleaf
in
Ben-gali
script.The dateisfbrtunatelygiveninShastri's
transcriptionof the colophon asfbl-lows:
viin"amadityadevasarp 1492phtzigunasudi4kty'e
1
intheVikramayear1492,inthebrightfortnightofPhElguna, on thefourth
[tithi]
, on TuesdayIn
thecase of themonth ofPhalguna,
thereis
nodifference
between caitradi andkarttikadi
systems.
As
fbr
thebright
fortnight,
thereisno differencebetween amanta andptimpimanta systems.Therefbre
wehave
only totakeinto
consideration whether theyearis
cited asex-pired
orcurrent.1.Ifthe Vikrama year 1492 istaken as a current year,the dateshould beWednesday,February2,
1435CE.
2. Ifthe Vikrama year1492 istaken as an expired year,the dateshould be Tuesday,February21,
1436 CE.
The
date
ofthe manuscript canbe
thusdeterminedas Tuesday, February21,1436 CE.Ka-ragedoi{ytiha
I
shall nowlook
at a thirdcolophon.It
is
found
in
a KZira44avyfihamanuscript owned
by
aprivate
collectorin
Mumbai.
The
wooden covers and threefolios
ofthe manuscript also
include
some miniatures. Pal(1966)
includesphotos
ofthe three(232)
EyidenceofBuddhism in15th-CenturyEasternIndia(Sh,
HoRi)the colophon
(fblio
78r;fig.
405),
whichhe
also transcribed.His
reading, however,con-tainsmany mistakes. The photoisnot very clear and
parts
of thecolophon aredamaged
orillegible.
But
fbrtunately,
the dateislegibleas fbllows:r4 saO 1512karttikabadi
O
13budhe1
intheyear1512,inthedarktbrtnightof Karttika,on the13th
[tithi],
on WednesdayThe year1512 undoubtedly refers tothe
Vikrama
Era.
Takinginto
account the samecrite-ria as inthe firstcolophon examined above, i.e.,atita, karttikadi,
ptirrpimanta,
we can es-tablishthedateas Wednesday, October27,1456CE.
Historical
Background
AccordingtoJosephE.Schwartzberg
(1992:
39,pl.
V.3(D),
theterritoriesof two Islamicdynastiesoverlapped
in
theBihar
area inthe firsthalfof the15th
century: namely, theSharqi
dynasty,whose capital city wasJaunpur,
and theIlyEs
Sh5hi
dynasty
based
in
Bengal.
It
is
more iikelythattheSharqidynasty
had
effectivecon-trolover southern Biharinthe15thcentury
because
coinsissued
by
theSharqi
kings
atthattime
have
been
discovered
indifferentpartsof Biharincluding
Rajgir
(Diwakar
1959:393-394).
The
colophens ofthe three datedmanuscripts clearly show thatBuddhists
stillsurvived around thebirthplaceofBuddhism untilthemiddle ofthe 15thcentury inspite of
theeffective rule of an Islamicdynasty.The
fact
thatvillage names ending in-grama- arefound
in
allthecolophons may suggest thatBuddhism was stillalive especiallyin
somerural areas
in
Bihar. The Buddhistswere stillcopying and transmittingsuchMahayana
andVajrayana
textsasgantideva's
Bodhicar:yavatdra,theKararp4a){yijha,
and theKtilaca-kratantra.
Thisshows us that although thedestructionof
the
major monasteries by TurkicMuslimsbefore
and after theturnofthe 13thcenturyhad
delivered
adisastrous
blow tothe fateofIndianBuddhism, thereligion
had
not been eliminated completelyin
Eastern
India,includ-ing
Bihar.As
late
as250
yearsafter thisblow,
Buddhism
was stillalivein
thearea andits
fo11owers
were stilltransmittingtheirsacred textsin
Sanskrit.1
)
Fortheterm `[OldBengaliscript," see Dimitrov
(2002:
29).2
)
Aphoto of folio128rwas publishedinPai(1965:
pL I).3
)
For contributions by art historians,see Weissenborn(2012:
312).Kim(2013:
250,268,340n116,343n141,345n155) alsodealtwith thismanuseript.
4
)
Forthiscomputer programand thetraditionalIndiancalendar, see Yttno(2007)
.Alldatingsinthispaperare based upon Pancanga, version 3.14.
EvidenceofBuddhism in15th-CenturyEastern!ndia
(Sh,
HoRi)(233)
5
)
The Kli"ikaV?'ttigivesan example devadattakah;`Lgramapthpradhanah, mukhyah ity arthah.
clevadattah grama4ih esam devaclattakiih"
(Sharrna
et al. 1970:516).6
)
AccordingtoBaneriee(1985:
265n9), a manuscript ofthe KZilacakeatantrainthe Royal Asiatic SocietyofGreat Britainand Ireland,London(Hodgson
Collection49), alsoreads thisversein
its
col-ephon.
SymbolsUsedintheIYansliteration o
*
4il;or
a divisionofan aksara intotwo partsforconvenience's sake
a backslashwith a small circle on theright of sa toindicatethe abbreviation fbrsarpvat; see Einicke
(2009:
68-69,274). - -tvlramatlando ttdouble clanda --a space filler astringhole recto Works Cited rBaneejee,Biswanath,ed. 1985.A Criticalthition
ofSri
KZilacakratantra-Rby'a(Coilated
with thebetanvansion). BibliothecaIndica:A Collectionof OrientalWorks 311.Calcutta:TheAsiatic ciety.
Bendal!,Cecil.1883.Catalogue
ofthe
BudtthistSt7nskritManuscriptsinthe(inivenydyLibrary,bricige,with introductoryNbticesand Mustrationsqf'thePalteognaphyand Chronology
ofIVbpal
andBengat. Cambridge:UniyersityPress.Chandra,Moti. 1971."A Pair
of PaintedWooden Coversof the KarapdavyiihaManuscriptDatedA.D. 1455fromEastem India."InAnand Krishna,ed., Chhavi.Golden.Jbebilee Pblume.Bharat Kala
Bhavan 1920-1970,240-242, figs.405g13. Banaras:BharatKala Bhavan.
Dimitrov,Dragomir.2002.'`[lables
ofthe Old BengaliScript
(on
theBasisofa NepaleseManuscriptofDapdin's Kliyyddarsia)." lnDragomir Dimitrov,UlrikeRoesler,and RolandSteiner,eds.,
samuccayah: Jhdianand nbetan
Studies
(Cbliectanea
MarpurgensiaindoIQgicaet nbetolagicof,27-78. Wiener Studienzur Tibetologieund Buddhismuskunde, Heft53.Wien:Arbeitskreisfur Tibetischeund BuddhistischeStudien,UniversittitWien.
Diwakar,R.R.1959.Biharthrough theAges.Bombay: OrientLongmans,
Einicke,Katrin.2009.Kbrrektur,DlO2inenzierungund Abkiii:zuirginindischeninschrij7enund
schrij}en. AbhandlungenfurdieKunde des Morgenlandes, Band 68.Wiesbaden:Harrassowitz
Verlag.
MizushimaLaboratory.2013.indiaPlace ]F:inder. http:!lindia.csis.u-tokyo.acjpLDepartmentof
ental History,GraduateSchoolofHumanities and Sociology,The UniversityofTbkyo. Kielhorn,Franz.1890."Examination
Anti-(234)
EvidenceefBuddhism in15th-CenturyEasternIndia(Sh.
HoRi)quat:v 19:166-187. ReprintedinWilhelmRau, ed., JilranzKieihorn,KleineSbhrij}enmit einer
Auswahl derepigraphischenAtefaditze.Teil1,534-555. Glasenapp-Stiftung,Band 3,1.Wiesbaden:
FranzSteinerVerlag,1969.
Kim,Jinah.2013.Receptaele
ofthe
SZ2cMed:MustratedAlanuscriptsand theBudohistBook CultinSbuthAsia.Berkeley:Universityof CaliforniaPress.
Pal,Pratapaditya.1965."A
New Document of IndianPainting.".Jburnal
ofihe
RayaiAsiaticSociety
ofGneat
Britain& beland(New
Series)97:103-111,pls.I-VI. .1966."Evidences ofBuddhist PaintinginE.Indiainthe 15thC.".Jberrnal qftheAsiatic
ety
(Fourth
Series)8.4:267-270, figs.1-2.Raghu Vira,and Lokesh Chandra,eds. 1966.Ktilacaki"a-7lantraand Other 1lexts.Part1.
Sata-Pitaka
Series,vol. 69.New Delhi:internationalAcademy of IndianCulture.
Schwartzberg,JosephE.,ed. 1992.A HItstoricalAtlasqf'SouthAsia.2nd impressien,with additional material. New Ybrk:OxfbrdUniversityPress.
Sharma,Aryendra,KhanderaoDeshpande,and D. G.Padhye,eds. 1970,Kdsikii:A Cbmmentaryon
Pduini's
Grammar.Partll
d4dhyayas
5-8)by
vamana & laydditya.SanskritAcademy Series20. Hyderabad: SanskritAcademy, Osmania University.Shastri,HaraPrasad.1917.A DescriptiveCatalogue
oj'Sbnscrit
Manuscriptsinthe Governmentlectionunder the(;Ure
oftheAsiatic
SocietyofBengaL
Vbl.1,BuddhistManuscripts.CalcuttaiBaptistMissionPress.Reprint,Kolkata:The AsiaticSociety,2005.
[[bkahata,Kanga, ed. 1954.Ratnamfildvadiina:A GarlandqfPreciousGems or a Collection
ing 1lales,7bldina MetricatFt)nm,Betongingtothe Mahdyana.OrientalLibrarySeriesD, vol. 3. 1[bkyo:The TbyoBunko.
Weissenborn,Karen. 2012. "Eine AuflistungilluminierterbuddhistischerSanskrit-Handschriftenaus
Ostindien."BeriinerindologischeStudien20:277-318. Yane, Michio.2007.`・Paficahga, Ancient
and Modern."InPurushottamaBilimoriaand MelukoteK.
Sridliar,eds., 7Faditions
ofSbieneer
Cross-culturalPempectives.Essays inHbnourofB.
VLrayappa, 59-71.New Deihi:Munshiram ManoharlalPublishers.
Yano, Michio, and Makoto Fushimi. 2014. Pancanga.Version3.14.March 2014.httpi!!www.cc.
kyoto-su.ac.jp!--yanomlpancangal.
(This
work was supported byJSPSKAKENHI GrantNumber 23520070.)<Key
words> KZilacakeratantra,EasternIndia,Bihar,Kerki,OldBengaliscript, 15thcentury