博士学位論文内容の要旨
氏 名 森田
モ リ タ智之
ト モ ユ キ所 属 人間健康科学研究科 人間健康科学専攻 学 位 の 種 類 博士(理学療法学)
学 位 記 番 号 健博 第
102号 学位授与の日付 平
27年
9月
30日
課程・論文の別 学位規則第4条第2項該当
学 位 論 文 題 名
Lifestylerisk factors for pressure ulcers incommunity-basedpatientswith spinal cord injuriesin Japan
(地域生活を送る脊髄損傷者の日常生活に関連する褥瘡発生リスク要因 の検討)
論 文 審 査 委 員 主査 教 授 山田 拓実 委員 教 授 網本 和 委員 准教授 池田 由美
【論文の内容の要旨】
Study design: Case-control study.
Objectives: To identifydaily living-related risk factors forpressure ulcer (PU) occurrencein community-living patients with spinal cord injury(SCI). To determine whether seat pressure influencesPU occurrence, and how oftenpatients withSCI performpressurerelief activities while livingin the community.
Setting: Kanagawa Rehabilitation Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
Methods: Thirty-onepatientsadmitted to the Kanagawa Rehabilitation Hospital for PU treatment were included in the case (PU) group. Thirtyoutpatients who did not have PUsat the time of the study, and had lived without PUs for at least a year, were included in the control (No PU) group. Patients wereinterviewed about
lifestyle-relatedPUriskfactorsand a pressure mapping system was used
tomeasureinterface pressure (IP) on their wheelchair seat. The No PU group patients recorded their daily activitiesand pressurereliefmaneuversfor 1week.
Results: Eight lifestyle factors and one risk assessment scalesignificantlydiffered between groups. Three factors showed significant odds ratiosby logistic regression. IP did not significantlydifferbetween groups.The self-countednumber of pressurerelief maneuvers (median (25th–75thpercentile)) performed per hour in the No PU group was 2.5(0.7-4.3), and including transfer and urinationwas 3.5(2.0-5.3).
博士学位論文内容の要旨
Conclusion: Weidentifiedpotential PU risk factorsrelatedtolifestyle.The scores of
onerisk assessment scalewere also associated with PU risk. Our results did not suggest an IP damage threshold. Patients in the No PU groupperformedpressurerelief
maneuvers, including related activities, approximately once every17 minutes.