• 検索結果がありません。

A Comparative Study of Speech Acts of Japanese and American College Students (5) : Degree of Pleasantness or Unpleasantness

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "A Comparative Study of Speech Acts of Japanese and American College Students (5) : Degree of Pleasantness or Unpleasantness"

Copied!
15
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

153

日米女子大生の会話比較(5):快・不快の度合い

滝沢 カ レン

A Comparative Study of Speech Acts of Japanese and

American College Students (5):Degree of Pleasantness or

Unpleasantness

Karen Ann Takizawa

長野市の清泉女学院短期大学 と米国マサチューセ ッツ州 アマース ト大学で実施 したコ ミュニケーシ ョン ・ス タイル調査の分析結果か ら、快 ・不快 の度合いについて論 じる。

1Introduction

Thisispart5inaseriesofarticlescomparingthecommunicationstylesofyoung womenatcollegesinJapanandtheUnitedStates.Previousarticlesdiscussedthe resultsofaDiscourseCompletionTestthatcoveredavarietyofspeechacts,suchas greetings,requests,responsestocomplimentsandcriticism,apologies,thanks,and classroominteraction.ThisarticlecoversanewSuⅣeyonCommunicationStylesthat attemptstomeasurethedegreeofpleasantnessorunpleasantnessstudentsfeelin theseconversationalsituations.

2SurveyonCommunicationStyles

TheDiscourseCompletionTestexaminedoutput,thatis,whatthestudentswould sayinagivenconversationalsituation.Thestudentshadtoreadeachitemonthetest andwritetheverbaland/ornonverbalresponsetheywouldmostlikelymake.Thenew

(2)

SuⅣeyonCommunicationStylesexaminesinput,specifically,how thestudentsfeel aboutwhatissaidbyothers.ForthesuⅣey,tenidenticalorcloselyrelatedsituations werechosenfrom theDiscourseCompletionTest.Oneormoreofthemostcommon responsesfrom theJapaneseandAmericandatawerelistedundereachone,foratotal oftwenty-sixitems.TheJapanese-languageresponsesweretranslatedintoEnglishfor theEnglish-languageversionofthesuⅣey,andtheEnglishresponsesweretranslated intoJapanesefortheJapanese-languageversion.Therewasnoindicationoftheorigin oftheitem.Thestudentshadtoreadthesituationsandratethedegreeofpleasantness orunpleasantnesstheyfeltabouteachitemonthefollowingfive-pointscale:

Therewasalsoaspaceforstudentstowritecommentsabouteachsituation,ifthey wished.The‡-testwasappliedtotheresultsforeachitem.AccordingtoHatchand Lazaraton,thistestwasespeciallydesignedtocomparethestatisticaldifferences betweengroupsforsmallsamplesizes.Theresultsofthei-testareshowninthe followlngChart.

Table1:Meanandfvalues

situation ⅠtemNo. me(Ameraicnan) me(Japaneanse) i dF P Greetings "Hi!■ー 21 2.1.0536 2.1.7138 0.1.4123 4242 n.n.SS.. 3 1.95 2.41 1.44 42 n.S. Requests(1) 一一BioNotesH 45 3.1.9685 2.2.9191 2.3.4120 4242 <.<.0015 Requests(2) ●ーEmptySeattt 76 2.3.7237 3.2.8705 2.2.1183 4422 <.<.0055 Advice HPre-medCourse'ー 89 2.2.9191 2.2.4577 0.1.4548 4422 n.n.SS.. Complaints

"NoisyPartyー' 1l120l 4.2.3.915189 3.3.2.285963 0.11..292973 424242 n.n.n.SSS... Apologies

(3)

滝沢 :AComparatlVeStudyofSpeechActsoりapaneseandAmericanCollegeStudents(5):DegreeofPleasantnessorUnpleasantness 155 Disagreelng I-ⅠnClassH 1165 2.2.8686 2.3.9514 11..0283 4242 n.n.SS.. 17 2.32 2.18 0.40 42 n.S. Requests(3) "TheWindowH 1189 4.1.8322 2.3.2273 4.1.4638 4242 <.n.0S01. 20 3.27 3.59 1.33 42 n.S. Requests(4)

"EXtraMoney■' 2122 2.3.7413 2.2.6886 4.1.3064 4242 <.n.0S01.

Co一一RemplcruiimetSuintts" 23 3.64 3.27 1.32 42 n.S. 24 2.77 2.59 0.55 42 n.S. 25 3.00 2.36 2.00 42 <.10 26 1.73 1.73 0.00 42 n.S. Thefollowinggraphshowsthemostfrequentresponseforeachitem.

Chart1:Mode (MostFrequentResponseforeachitem)

Ⅰnthefollowingsection,thesituationswillbediscussedintheorderinwhichthey appearedinthesuⅣey.

(4)

3StudentRatingsotPleasantness/UnpleasantnessfortheItemsinEach Situation

3.1 Greetings-■■Hi■■

situation:Ⅰnthemorningonyourwaytothelibra叩,youpassthreefriends(A,B,and C)goingtheotherway.Theygreetyou.(Ⅰmaginethatyouknowthethreestudents equallywellandseethemoftenandthatnoneofyouareespeciallybusy.)

状況 :朝、あなたは、図書館 に行 く途中、反対方向か らきた3人の友達A,B,Cと行 き 合い ま した○彼等 は下記の ような挨拶 をしま した○(彼等 は、あなたが よく顔 を合わせ

ⅠNo.tem Mode

1 Asays,"Hi.‖ 2

Aは、「おは よう」 3

2 Bsays,ttHi,(yourfirstname).How■sitgoing?■■ 1 Bは 「おは よう○<あなたの名前 >、調子 どう?」 1 3 Csays,"Hi,(yourlastname).Howーsitgoing?‖ 1

TherewasnosignificantdifferencebetweentheratingsoftheJapaneseand Americanstudentsforanyoftheitemsinthissituation.Accordingtotheresultsofthis suⅣey,bothprefertobegreetedbyname.

InTakizawa (1996),theJapanesestudentsshowedaverymarkedpreferencefor usingonlyaformulaicexpression,suchas「お は よ う」or「こん に ち は」ingreeting theirfriends.TheAmerican studentsused greetingsthatincluded a formulaic expression,aname,andsomesortofconversationalexpression.

BothJapaneseandAmericanstudentscommentedthattheylikethefeelingof friendlinessandintimacythatcomeswiththeuseoftheirfirstname(No.2).Some AmericanstudentssaidthatitwouldbeoddforsomeonetousealastnameintheUSA, unlessitwasasanickname,whenthefriendknewthefirstname.Otherssimplysaid thattheydidnotlikebeingcalledbytheirlastnamesunlessitwasaspecialsituation,

(5)

滝沢 :AComparatlVeStudyofSpeechActsoりapaneseandAmerlCanCollegeStudents(5):DegreeofPleasantnessorUnpleasantness 157

suchasaJapaneselanguageclass.Itwasalsomentionedthatuseoflastnamesin greetingswouldbemorecommonamongmalesthanfemalesintheUSA.

3.2 Requests(1) -I.BioNotes.I

situation:Therewillbeatesttomorrowinyourbiologyclass.Yourfriends(AandB) wereabsentfromclasslastweek,Sotheywouldliketomakeacopyofyoum otes. 状況 :明 日、生物学のテス トがあ ります○先週欠席 した友達

A,

B

があなたのノー トを

ⅠNo.tem Mode

4 Asayscasually,"Hey,1etmecopyyourbionotes.■' 4 Aは、 くだけた表現で 「ねえ、生物のノー ト、コピーさせて」 と頼み 3

ました○

5 Bscopiaeyspodyournolitely,‖tesⅠmi?一一ssedtheclasslastweek.WouldyoumindifⅠ 1 Bは、丁寧 な表現で 「先週休んで しまったので、先週のノー トコピー 2

TherewasasignificantdifferencebetweentheJapaneseandAmericanresponses forbothitemsinthissection.TheAmericanstudentsfeltthatthepoliterequest(No.

5) wasmorepleasantandlikelytobegrantedbecauseitshowedrespect.The Japanesestudentsfeltcomfortablewiththemorecasualrequest(No.4),andinfact thoughtthatthepoliterequestsoundedoddcomingfrom afriend.Bothgroups, however,wantedtoknowthereasontheirfriendmissedclassbeforeagreeingtolend thenotes.

3.3 Requests (2) -■■EmptySeat■■

situation:Ⅰnthecafeteria,youputyourbagontheemptyseatneXttoyoutosaVeit forafriend.Twostudentsyoudonotknow(AandB)speaktoyouabouttheseat. 状況 :カフェテ リアであなたは、友人の座席 を確保 しようとして、空いている横 の席

(6)

ⅠNo.tem Mode

6 Assowecaysianafnsirtheiendrelya?"nddirectway,ttwouldyoumindmoVingyourbag 4 Aは、親 しげに、そ して直接的に、「バ ッグどけていただけませ んか、 4 座 りたいんで」 と言い ま した○

7 B ssittlanyghesinasre?一一eriousandroundaboutway,"EXcuseme?Ⅰsanyone 2 Bは、神妙そ うに、そ して遠回 しに、「すみ ません、この座席空いてい 1

Theresultslooksimilar,butactuallytherewasasignificantdifferencebetweenthe twogroupsforbothitemsinthissituation.Bothgroupsdislikedtherequesttomove thebag (No.6),buttheJapanesestudentsweremorestronglyirritatedbyitthanthe Americanswere.OneJapanesestudentcommentedthatitsoundedinappropriatefor theiragegroup,almostmiddle-aged.Bothgroupsfeltmorecomfortablewiththe questionabouttheemptyseat(No.7)becauseitwaspoliteandshowedrespect,butthe Japanesestudentsweremorestronglypositiveaboutitbecauseitcontainedthe expression「すみ ません」.

3.4 Advice-■■Pre-modCourse"

situation:Yourroommate,influencedbyapopularTVprogram,hasrecentlybeen thinkingaboutchangingtothepre一medcourseatyouruniVersity.Youhearyour roommatetalkingtotwofriends(AandB)aboutit.(Ⅰmaginethatyouandthetwo friendsknowthatyourroommatedoesnーtliketostudyandisnーtreallysuitedtobeing adoctor.)

状況 :あなたのルームメー トは、最近、人気 テ レビ番組の影響で医者 になることを目 指そ うと思 うようにな りま した○あなたは、そのルームメー トが二人の友人 (A、B) とその ことをについて話 しているの を耳 に しました○ (あなた も、その友人A、Bも、 あなたのルームメー トが勉 強嫌いで、実際 に医者 に向いていない ことが分 つている と

(7)

滝沢 :AComparatlVeStudyofSpeechActsofJapaneseandAmencanCollegeStudents(5):DegreeofPleasantnessorUnpleasantness 159

ⅠNo.tem Mode

8 A tHanrgliestntoaherVoe!一一idhurtingyourroommateーsfeelingsandsays,HCool! 3 Aは、ルームメー トの気持 ちを傷つけない ように、「す ごい、がんばつ 3 て」 と言 って ます○

9 B afrankskstlysaheryswhaeastheonwh/shetyyhiourrnksoooftmmaheitdeewaa.ntstobeadoctorand 4 Bは、ルームメー トが なぜ医者 にな りたいのか理 由を尋 ね、それか ら 3

Therewasnosignificantdifferencebetweenthetwogroupsforeitheritem inthis situation.

AmericanstudentshadawiderangeofreactionstoNo.8.Some,whoratedit

"somewhatpleasant■■,consideredA tobeasupportivefriend.Others,whoratedit Hsomewhatunpleasant",Wereannoyedbecauseshewassimplylyingtotheroommate. Japanesestudentshadmoreneutralreactions.MostthoughtthatAwasrightnotto discouragetheroommatefrom studyingmedicinebecauseshewasinnopositionto knowhowAmightchangeinthefuture.

BothJapaneseandAmericanstudentscommentedthatB (No.9)wasbeingan honest,butnecessary,friend.Theynotedthatcandorandtrutharesometimesneither politenorpleasant,andnoonewantedtohurtafriend■sfeelings.Inanycase,they wantedtogivetheirfriendmoralsupportandencouragehertofollowherdream.

3.5 Complaints-.lNoisyPartyl.

situation:Ⅰtismidnight.YouarehaVingapartyinyourapartment,anditseemsthat yourneighbors(A,B,andC,alsostudents)arebotheredbytheloudmusic.(Ⅰmagine thatyouhaVenotbeenliVinginthisapartmentVerylong,andyouhavehadseVeral noisyparties.)

状況 :今、真夜 中で、あなたは、 自分の アパ ー トでパ ーテ ィーを開いてい ます○隣人 (学生A、B、C)が、騒が しい音楽 に迷惑が ってい る ようです○ (あなたは、 このア パ ー トに引 っ越 して来てか ら、 まだあ ま り日がたっていず、 また、すで に数回騒が し

(8)

ⅠNotem. Mode

10 Addayaoendasnttsskshiayamtnythiodosngtooymeotu.Hehinga/sbohegouttheprestotoblhelem.andlordtheneXt 5

Aは、あなたに何 も言 わず、次 の 日、管理人 に何 とか して もらえるよ 3 うにたのみ ましたo

ll Bkofninghtockso."nyourdoorandmildlysays,"It'sprettyloudforthistime 2

Bは、あなたの部屋 をノ ック し

「この時間ですか ら、かな り聞 こえ 2 て くるんです」 と穏やかに言い ました○

12 CkTurnonictdksoown!nyo"urdoorandsaysstrongly,‖Ⅰttstoonoisy.ⅠCanttsleep. 4 Cは、あなたの部屋 をノック し、「うるさ くて眠れない、ボ リュームを 4

TherewasnosignificantstatisticaldifferencebetweentheJapaneseandAm erican studentsinthissituation.AmericanstudentsreactedmorenegativelytoNo.10than Japanesestudents,whoaremoreaccustomedtotheideaofsolvingproblemsthrougha thirdparty.However,SeveralJapanesestudentscommentedthattheywouldfeel annoyedifsomeonedidthistothem.Notsurprisingly,bothgroupspreferredB's approach(No.ll),thepolitehinttoturndownthemusic.BothgroupsfoundC-sangry complaintunpleasanteventhoughitwasjustified.

3.6 ApologleSI.IFrisbeePlayer"

situation:Youaresittingonthegrassreadingabook.Nearby,somestudentsare playingFrisbee.Twoofthem (AandB)accidentallybumpintoyou.

状況 :キャンパスの芝生で座 って本 を読 んでい ます○近 くで、何人かの学生が フリス ビーを してい ますo学生 (A,B)が、 もののはずみで、あなたの足 をふみ ました○

ⅠNo.tem Mode

(9)

滝沢 :AComparativeStudyofSpeechActsofJapaneseandAmerlCanCollegeStudents(5川egreeofPleasantnessorUnpleasantness 161

14 Blooksseriousandsays,一一Sorry.Areyouhurt?" 1&2

Inthissituation,therewasaveryslgnificantdifferencebetweenthegroupsin No.13,butnodifferenceinNo.14.TheAmericansratedbothitemsalmostequally I-pleasant"or Hsomewhatpleasant",Commenting thatthey found both sincerely apologetic.Itwas,afterall,anaccident,theycommented.TheJapanesestudents showedastrongpreferenceforNo.14.TheyratedNo.13''unpleasant"becauseit showednoconcernforthewelfareoftheinjuredparty.Thissameresultwasseenin Takizawa(1998),whereJapanesestudentstendedtoexpressresponsibilityfortheir actionsafterthesetphraseofapology.TheAmericanstudents,ontheotherhand, tendedtoofferanexplanationfortheiraction.Inthiscase,noexplanationwasneeded becausethesituationwasobviousfromthecontext.

3.7 Disagreeingl.lJnClass"

situation:Youaretakingnotesduringalectureinaclassofabout30students.Some femalestudentssittingnearyou(A,ち,andC)seemtodisagreewithsomethingthe teachersays.

状況 :あなたは約30人の学生 と心理学 の講義 を受 け、 ノー トを取 ってい ますoあなた の周 りに座 っている女子学生 (A,B,C)が教授が言 ったことに対 して、何 か異議があ

ⅠNotem. Mode

15 Ahashecsapuzontinuezstledeakixnprgnoesstieonos.nherface.Shedoesn.tsayanything,and 3 Aさんは、教授 に賛同で きない といった表情 を して、何 も言わず ノー 3

トを取 り続 けました○

16 BwhisperstothestudentneXttoher,一一ButⅠthinkit■S□□□ …‖ 3 Bさんは、ひそひそ と隣の学生 に話 してい ます○「私 は、□□口だ と忠 3

(10)

17 Cransaweiserashelsoporhasndisiblmmee?■ーdiatelyandsays,■■Ⅰthinkit'Sロ□□ ….Ⅰsthis 2 Cさんは、直ちに挙手 し、「私は□□ロ と思いますが、この考えもあ り 1

Therewasnosignificantdifferencebetweenthegroupsinthissituation.Bothgave neutralratlngStONo.15.TheyalsogaveneutralratlngStONo.16,thoughthequestion ofshigo (whispering)producedverydifferentresultsbetweenthegroupsonthe DiscourseCompletionTest(Takizawa,1999).Bothgroupsgave"pleasantHor"somewhat pleasantHratingstoNo.17.Americanstudentscommentedthataskingquestionsin classwasnotonlybetterforthestudent■sownunderstandingofthesubject,butalso beneficialtotheclassasawhole.TheJapanesestudentsidentifiedmostcloselywith StudentsAandB.TheyadmiredStudentC,whohadtheconfidencetoraisehis/her handtoaskaquestioninclass,butmanycommentedthattheypersonallywould probablybetooshytodoso.Otherscommentedthatitwasnotappropriatetointerrupt theteacherduringthelessoninthisway.

3.8 Requests (3) -■■TheWindow■■

situation:Theroom wherethetennisclubmeetsishot.Threethird-yearmale students,(A,B,andC)askfirst-yearstudentswhoaresittingnearthewindowsto openthem.

状況 :テニス部の3年生 (A、B、C君)は、部室が暑いので、窓の近 くにいる 1年生

ⅠNo.tem Mode

18 Alooksatonestudentandsays,1'openthewindow:' 5

A君は、「窓開けて」 と言いました○ 3

19 B lwindoooksaw?■ーtanotherstudentandsays,"Couldyoupleaseopenthe 1 B君は、 もう一人の学生 を見て

,

「窓開けて ください」 と言 ました○ 2&3 20 Cfanshimselfandsays,'TIt'Shotinhere." 3

(11)

滝沢 :AComparatlVeStudyofSpeechActsoりapaneseandAmerlCanCollegeStudents(5):DegreeofPleasantnessorUnpleasantness 163

TherewasaverysignificantdifferencebetweentheratingsforNo.18,butnonefor Nos.19and20.InTakizawa (1996),theexpressionsusedwhenmakingrequestswere rankedfrom mosttoleastpolite.Inbothlanguages,theexpressionusedinNo.18was atthebottomofthelist.OntheJapanese-languageversionoftheDiscourseCompletion Test,however,thiswasfoundtobethemostcommonform chosenforrequeststo familymembers(73.5%)andthesecondmostcommonform chosenforrequeststo friends(28.6%).Inotherwords,itisastandardwaytomakearequesttomembersof one-sin-group.Thethird-yearstudentinthissituationwasasempai(anoldermember ofthesamegroup),sotheJapanesestudents,whoareveryconsciousoftheirplacein anyhierarchy,wereneutralaboutthisitem.TheresultsoftheDiscourseCompletion TestshowedthatAmericansdonotmakesuchacleardistinctionbetweenrequeststo in-group and out-group members.Polite language is always considered more appropriate when making a request,so the American students rated No.18 ''unpleasant一一.Infact,somecalledit■■JuStrude".

No.19,wor°edinstandardmid-levelpoliteness,wasthemostpleasant-soundingto bothgroups."Beingpolitemakesiteasiertocomplywith"wasoneAmericanstudent-s commentonthis.

BothgroupsgavenegativeratingstoNo.20,whereStudentC wasindirectly makingtherequest.Japanesestudentscommentedthattheyfeltannoyedthatthe

sempaididnotmaketherequestclearly.

3.9 Requests(4)-■tExtraMoney"

situation:Thesetwofemalestudents(AandB)receiVeamonthlyallowancefrom theirparents.ThismonththeyhaVesomeuneXpectedexpenses.Youhearthem askingtheirparentsforaneXtra$3000Verthephone.

状況 :友人の女子学生

(

A、B

さん)は、両親か ら毎月定額の仕送 りを受けてい ます○ 今月は特別なお金が必要なようで、電話で両親 に3万円の臨時仕送 りをお願い している

(12)

INo.tem Mode

21 Asmealaysi,"ttlMoebim,Ⅰtofe■m sXtroramory,Ⅰnetm aly,aboitut$tles30ho0,rbetocncausae.sht…●hiーsmonth.Send 4 Aさんは、「お母 さん、ごめん、お金た りな くなつちやった○ ち ょっ と 3 余分 に送 って、… なので (理由)3万円ばか り」 と言 って ます○

22 Bsmontaysh.Ⅰ,"'Mollnem,edaⅠwaboswondeut$300beringicausf

Ⅰc

e

….

o

u

l

dhaVesomeeXtramoneythis 2 Bさんは、「お母 さん,今 月余分 にお金送 っていただけないで しょう 4

TherewasaverysignificantdifferencebetweentheratingsforNo.21,butno differenceforNo.22.American studentsrated A■srequestmorenegatively and commentedthatitsoundedtoodemandingandrude.Japanesestudentscommented thattheywouldmostlikelymaketherequestinthiswaytoafamilymember.American studentsfeltthatB■srequestsoundedmorepleasantandappropriateandlikelytobring them theresulttheydesired.JapanesestudentsthoughtBsoundedunnaturallypolite andsuspectedthatsomethingwaswrongwiththerelationshipbetweenthemotherand daughter.AfewJapanesestudents,however,commentedthatitmightbebettertobe morepolitewhenaskingforsuchalargeamountofmoney.

3.10 RespondingtoCompliments-■■RecruitSuitH

situation:Fourmalestudents(A,B,C,andD)havecometoschooltodaywearing suitsbecausetheywillbehavingemploymentinteⅣiewsafterclass.Theirteacher says,"Youlooknicetoday.You'VegotajobinteⅣiew,havenーtyou?■ー(Ⅰmaginethatall fourstudentsliketheirsuits.)

状況 :その 日の午後 は、就職面接がある日なので、A、B、C、D君が、朝、スーツで 登校 しました○彼等の教授が、スーツ姿の学生 に、「スマー トに決 まってるよ○就職試 験 の面接があるんだね○」 と言い ま した○ (学生 は、それぞれ 自分で もスー ツ姿が気 に

(13)

滝沢 :AComparativeStudyofSpeechActsoりapaneseandAmericanCollegeStudents(5):DegreeofPleasantnessorUnpleasantness 165

ⅠNotem. Mode

23 Ashakeshisheadandsayshumbly,一一Ⅰdonttlookgoodinasuityet." 4 A君 は、謙遜 して、首 を横 に振 り 「僕 にはスーツはまだ似合い ませ ん 3

よ」 と言いま した○

24 Bsstraanyges,H?■■Really?Ⅰ一m notusedtowearlngaSuit.Don'tⅠ10okalittle 3 B君 は、「本当ですか ?慣 れない格好 なので変 じやないですか?」と言 3 い ました○

25 Clooksalittleembarrassedandsays,■ーⅠー11domybestattheinteⅣiew.一一 3 C君 は、 ち ょっ と恥ずか しそ うに、「(就職試験 の面接)頑張 って きま 2 す」 とだけ言い ました○

26 Dlookspleasedandsays,ー1Thankyou." 1

TherewasasignificantdifferencebetweenthegroupsforNo.25,butnoneforNos. 23,24,and26.AswasseeninTakizawa(1997),bothJapaneseandAmericanstudents feltthatthesimpleappreciationtoken■thankyou'wasthemostpoliteandpleasant responsewhenreceivingacompliment.DifferencesbetweenJapaneseandAmericans appearedintheiruseofotherstrategies,suchastheexpressionsofembarrassmentor humilityinNos.23and25.TotheAmericanstudents,theseshowalackofconfidence andarenotgraciouswaystoreceiveacompliment.InNo.25,forexample,the complimentaboutthenewsuitisnotevenacknowledged,andattentionisdrawntothe jobinteⅣiew.Bothgroupswereneutralabouttheexpressionofsurpriseanddenialof thecomplimentinN0.24.Infact,thestudent,whoprobablyusuallydressedcasuallyfor class,wasonlytellingthetruth,andboththestudentandteachermayhaveshareda laughoverthis.

4 Conclusion

Ofthetwenty-sixitemsontheSuⅣeyofCommunicationStyles,therewasa significantdifferencebetweentheJapaneseandAmerican studentson eight:six requests,Oneapology,andonecomplimentresponse.Wehadexpectedthestudentsto

(14)

ratetheitemsthatwererepresentativeoftheirownlanguageandcultureonthe DiscourseCompletionTestmorepositively,andsoconfirm thoseresults.Asitis,We founddifferencesinonlythreecategories:

1)Thebiggestdi#erencewasseeninthewordingandlevelofpolitenessofrequests. Japanesestudentsmadeacleardistinctionbetweenin-group(familyandclosefriends) andouLgroupwhentheymakerequests.Infact,itwasfoundthatin一grouprequests thatarecomfortableandfamiliarinJapaneselookedquiterudewhentranslatedinto English.Americans,whodonotmakeasmuchofadistinctioninthiscase,feelthat speakingpolitelytofamilymembersisasimportantasspeakingpolitelytostrangers. ThismadeAmerican-stylerequeststofamilymemberssoundstrangeandunnatural whentranslatedintoJapanese.

2)Inthecaseoftheapologies,theAmericanstudentsweresatisfiedwithasetphrase. TheJapanesestudents,however,feltthattheapologywasincompleteandinsincere withouttheadditionalexpressionofconcern.

3)Whenreceivingacompliment,Americansconsiderasimple,directappreciation tokentobethemostappropriateresponse,whileJapanesevalueexpressionsofhumility incomplimentresponses.

Wecanconcludefrom thissuⅣeythatinputandoutputarenotalwaysquitethe sameandfeelingsofpleasantnessandunpleasantnessaboutlanguageusearedifficult tomeasure.

Note:Twenty-two female students (ages18-21)atAmherstCollege in Amherst,

Massachusetts,USA,filledouttheEnglish-languageversionofthesuⅣeyinDecember, 2000.Twenty-twoJapanese-languageversionsofthesuⅣeywerechosenatrandom fromthesixty-sixthatwerefilledoutatSeisenJogakuinCollegeinJanuary,2001.

(15)

滝沢 :AComparativeStudyofSpeechActsoりapaneseand血encanCollegeStudents(5川egreeofPleasantnessorUnpleasantness 167

Acknowledgement:IwouldliketothankProfessorWakoTawaofAmherstCollegefor hercooperationincollectingdataforthissuⅣey.

References:

Hatch,EvelynandAnneLazaraton.(1991)TheResearchManual.DesignandStatisticsfor

AppliedLinguistics.Boston,Massachusetts:Heinle&Heinle.

Takizawa,Karen.(1996)AComparativeStudyofSpeechActsofJapaneseandAmerican CollegeStudents (1):GreetingsandRequests.BulletinofSeisenJogakuin

Couege14.73191,

-一一一一一日一一.(1997)A ComparativeStudyofSpeechActsofJapaneseandAmericanCollege Students (2):ResponsestoComplimentsand Criticism.Bulletin of Seisen

Jogakum College15:1011126

---I.(1998)A ComparatlVeStudyofSpeechActsofJapaneseandAmericanCollege Students(3):ApologiesandThanks.BulletinofSeisenJogakuinCollege16:9

3-110

---日-.(1999)A ComparativeStudyofSpeechActsofJapaneseandAmericanCollege Students (4):Classroomlnteraction.BulletinofSeisenJogakuinCollege18 99

Tabl e 1: Meanandf val ues

参照

関連したドキュメント

森 狙仙は猿を描かせれば右に出るものが ないといわれ、当時大人気のアーティス トでした。母猿は滝の姿を見ながら、顔に

ヒュームがこのような表現をとるのは当然の ことながら、「人間は理性によって感情を支配

このような情念の側面を取り扱わないことには それなりの理由がある。しかし、リードもまた

 このようなパヤタスゴミ処分場の歴史について説明を受けた後,パヤタスに 住む人の家庭を訪問した。そこでは 3 畳あるかないかほどの部屋に

エッジワースの単純化は次のよう な仮定だった。すなわち「すべて の人間は快楽機械である」という

としても極少数である︒そしてこのような区分は困難で相対的かつ不明確な区分となりがちである︒したがってその

○安井会長 ありがとうございました。.

としたアプリケーション、また、 SCILLC