JAIST Repository: TRONプロジェクトの標準化における成功・失敗要因
3
0
0
全文
(2) Analysis of Success Factors in Standardization of the TRON Project Keiichi Kurata School of Knowledge Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology March 2002 Keywords㧦technical standard㧘TRON project㧘OS㧘specification This paper is a case study about standardization of a TRON project. The TRON project is going to decide upon computer OS specification unique to Japan, and is going to realize "Dokodemo Computer" (called ubiquitous computing) environment. This is an industry-university cooperation project and Professor University of Tokyo Ken Sakamura is a project leader. This project is started from the 80s and, even now, is continued. The TRON project is divided into some sub projects. They are BTRON, CTRON, ITRON, etc. Generally, it is said ITRON is successful and that BTRON went wrong. However, distinction of a success or failure is defined below. It is whether the result of each sub project serves as a standard in the market. Generally, it is said that BTRON failed in the external pressure by the U.S.A. And it hardly inquires about the other factor. The purpose of this research made the comparative analysis of the BTRON to CTRON and ITRON, and aimed at extracting success / failure factor of the TRON project. Factors are examined from a technical, economical, and political viewpoint. Therefore, the circumstances of a project were investigated and a related interview from people was held. And it analyzed from the circumstances of the relation between companies, specification creation, and market formation etc. based on the data obtained from there. Consequently,. Copyright հ 2002 by KURATA Keiicchi.
(3) especially BTRON had the following features. It had become a situation like the bubble that only expectation swells without forming that specification decision and market formation have dissociated, i.e., a market. Such inside, by the external pressure from the U.S. having happened, it was influenced greatly and it went wrong. From the above analysis, following four were drawn as success / failure factors in standardization of TRON. (1) Existence of an alternative technology (2) Competition or cooperation relationship of a company (3) The existence and the method of management of the external pressure (4) Time of specification decision and market formation These four factors are involved mutually and considered to have opted for a success and failure. The TRON project had a unique situation also socially of Japan-U.S. trade friction. For the reason, it may be difficult to generalize this example simply. Therefore, future research is desired.. Copyright հ 2002 by KURATA Keiicchi.
(4)
関連したドキュメント
[r]
Nonetheless, the project has tackled the question “What do people feel when they use Wajima nuri products?”—a question which the Wajima nuri producers, who had been
＊2 Kanazawa University, Institute of Science and Engineering, Faculty of Geosciences and civil Engineering, Associate Professor. ＊3 Kanazawa University, Graduate School of
* Department of Mathematical Science, School of Fundamental Science and Engineering, Waseda University, 3‐4‐1 Okubo, Shinjuku, Tokyo 169‐8555, Japan... \mathrm{e}
For staggered entry, the Cox frailty model, and in Markov renewal process/semi-Markov models (see e.g. Andersen et al., 1993, Chapters IX and X, for references on this work),
This research was supported by Natural Science Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Jiangsu Province (10KJB110003) and Jiangsu Uni- versity of Science and
Then it follows immediately from a suitable version of “Hensel’s Lemma” [cf., e.g., the argument of [4], Lemma 2.1] that S may be obtained, as the notation suggests, as the m A
Arnold This paper deals with recent applications of fractional calculus to dynamical sys- tems in control theory, electrical circuits with fractance, generalized voltage di-
