• 検索結果がありません。

日本語拗音「ミャ」を利用した英語/?/の発音指導の効果-生起環境タイプ頻度とその増強練習効果

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "日本語拗音「ミャ」を利用した英語/?/の発音指導の効果-生起環境タイプ頻度とその増強練習効果"

Copied!
10
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Ef托ctsofPronunciationPracticeoftheEnglish/ae/Sound

UtilizingtheJapaneseContractedSoundlmjae]:Type

FrequencyinrIbrmsofDistributionalVarietyandtheEffbcts

OfPracticewithIncreasedDistributionalTypeFrequency

TbshihikoYAMAOKA

/小・ヾ′・UJJh・t、′中川!月・用心げglか′HJJf川J Abstract

ItisgenerallyobservedthatwhileJapanese−SpeakinglearnersofEnglishfeeltheycan

pronounce cat and cqp easily,they cannot easily pronounce mat and mqp.This article arguesthatthereasonforthisgeneralobservationmaylieinthedifferencesofapplicability

OftheJapanesecontractedsoundsbJa(lkj車】)andmya(lmjael)inEnglishpronunciation:

WhilelkjEelisreadilyappliedinpronouncingcatandcqp,【mjaelisnoteasilyappliedinmat andmqp・ThisarticlealsoarguesthatthedifferenceofapplicabilitybetweentheseJapanese COntraCtedsoundsiscausedbythedifferencesindistributionalvarietyoftheserespeCtive SOundsinJapanese:Whilelkjee]hasarichvariety,[mj∈可hasonlyalimitedvariety.Based Onthisreasoning,itcanbehypothesizedthatapplicabilityofthelmjaeIIsoundinEnglish pronunciationcanberaisedbypracticingthesoundwithitsincreaseddistributionalvariety. Resultsofthispracticethroughaquasi−eXperimentwithJapaneseuniversity studentsare reportedinthisarticleshowlngthefavorablebutlimitedeffectsofthepractice. 1.Introduction IthasbeenpointedoutthatJapanese−SpeakinglearnersofEnglishcanpronouncesuch WOrdscatandcqprelativelyeasilybuttheycannotpronouncewordssuchasmatandmqp easily(Matsuzawa,2004,P.68).Actually,thefirsttestofpronunciationofthese words administeredinaquasi−eXperimentwithtwenty−SixJapaneseuniversltyStudents,Whichwill beelaboratedinduepartofthisarticle,Showsthatwhilecatandcaparepronouncedwith the/ae/sound more than88%of the chances,mat and map are pronounced、Vith the Japanese/a/soundinsteadofthe/ae/soundlOO%oftheoppc:tunities.

ItmaybereasonabletosupposethatJapanese−SpeakinglearnersofEnglishapplythe Japanesecontractedsoundkya(/kja/)inthepronunciationofcatandcapandthustheyfeel

(2)

theycaneasilypronouncethem・Asamatteroffact,JapaneseloanwordsfromEnglish Which begin with4ya are pronounced with the/kja/sound(e・g・kyatto,Ayqppu),and, therefore,thesoundisappliedinpronounclngEnglishwordssuchascatandcap・Itmustbe stressedherethatthe/a/sourldin/kja/tendstobepulledabitforwardafterthe/j/soundand

assumesthequalityofthe/a3/sound(Makino,2005,P・29)・Thus,Phoneticdescriptionof

/kja/islkjae].ThismeansthatJapaneseTSPeakinglearnersofEnglishusuallypronouncecat andcqplkj恕tland【kjaep]ratherthan/ka∋t/and/ka∋P/・

Althoughitmaybeapointofargumenttodecidetowhatextentthelkj車lsoundcanbe

an acceptabJe aIternative to the/k㌍/sound and,Of course,ltis a matter to decide empirically,itisatleastpossibletoclaimthatthelkjaelsoundisafarbetteralternativethan /ka/:/kat/isnomoreacceptablepronunciationofcatthan/mat/isacceptablepronunciation Ofmat.ItshouldalsobenotedthatveryaccuratepronunciationofEnglishisnotneededfor everylearnerofEngJish.ThisisinharmonywiththeclaimbyJenkins(2000,p.17)that

PrOmOtlngmutualintelligibilityisfarmoreimportantthan“pushinglearnersofEnglishto attempt to approximate an Ll accent too closely,”recognlzlng the growlng nature Of

Englishasaninternationallanguage.ThisisespeciallythecasewithJapaneseelementary

SChoolteacherswhoareexpectedtoengagein“Englishactivities”withtheirstudentssince

theyaretoobusytolearnEnglishprorlunCiationsystematically.

Kya(lkjae])is notthe only contracted soundinJapanese:italsohas mya(lmjae])

amongothers・(1)Then aquestion mayarisewhyitis the case thatwhiJe theJapanese COntaCted[kjaelsoundisappliedinEnglishpronunciation,thecontractedsourld[mj車lis not・Itseemspossibletofindananswertothisquestionbyinvestlgatingthedistributional differencesofthesetwocontractedsoundsinJapanesephonologlCalenvironments.Thisis tobediscussedinthesectiontofollow. 2・PhonologicalDistributionalDi恥rencesoflkjae]andlmjeEB]inJapanese Inordertoexaminetowhatextenteachofthecontractedsoundslkj∈eland[mjaBlis usedinvariousphonologlCalcontextsinJapanese,thenumberofdifferentsyllablesounds immediatelyfollowlngeaChcontractedsoundiscountedbylookinguptheentrywordsin NihonKokugoDai−Jiten(JqpaneseNationalLanguageLa7YeDictionary)(2ndversion).

The result ofthisinvestlgation has revealed a striking differencein phonologlCal distributionalrichnessbetweenthesetwocontractedsounds:Whilelkja∋1takesasmanyas forty−threedifferentsyJJabJesoundsimmedjateJyafterjt,lmjaeltakesonJysjx(Ybmaoka,in

PreSS)・Thesesixwordshavingtheinitialcontractedlmja∋]soundaremyaa,myaO−ZOku,

myaku・myaSukqhLfukii,myanmaa・andmyakkan・Ofthesesixwords,myaaisthecrying SOund of a cat(meott)),myaO−ZOku begins with a proper noun(tribe name:Miao), myasukqbsukiiisaJsoapropernoun(nameofacomposer:叫′aSkovsky),andmyanmaais

(3)

OnCeagainapropernoun(nameofacountry:坤anmar),allofwhicharenotexpectedtobe

usedveryfrequentlyindailyconversation・Oftheremainingtwowords,myakkan(blood

VeSSel)isakindofvariationofmyaku㊥ulse)anditmaybeveryinfrequentinuse.Thus,it

maybesafetosaythattheinitiallImjEelsoundisusedonadailybasisalmostonlyinwords

beginningwith myaku such as myaku−haku bulsation),myakuAou bulsation),etc.

includingmyakuitself.

WhatinfluencedoesthisdifferenceinphonologlCaldistributionalvarietyhaveinthe

learnlngOfEnglishpronunciation?ThisisthethemetobetackledinthefollowlngSeCtions. 3.TypeFrequencyinTbrmsofDistributionalRichness InhisUsage−BasedModeloflanguagelearning,Tomasello(2003)hasintroducedan importantdistinctionbetweentokenfrequencyandtypefrequency.Bothofthesetwoterms

areconcernedwiththefrequencyofalingulSticinstanceexperiencedbythelearner.This

distinction refers to the different natures of frequency:tOken frequency refers to the

frequency with whichthe same speCificinstance appearsinlnput and type frequency indicatesthefrequencywithwhichdifferentinstancesofthesarneconstructionappearin lnput・Itisclaimedthattoken丘equencycontributestoentrenchmentoftheinstanceand typefiequencybringsaboutabstractionandgeneralizationoftheconstruction. Someexamplesmaybeinorderheretoshowthediffbrentcontributionsoftokenand type丘equencyinlanguageleamlng・Englishpastirregularverbsappearindividuallyand areleameditembyitemearlyinleamingbecausetheyareallrichintoken丘equency.In

COntraSt,Englishpastregularverbsappearfbrmalizedinmanydi飴rentverbsandthusthe

generalpatternOfthepastregularisleamedsincethepatternisrichintype丘equency. Whiletokenfrequencyandtype丘・equenCybothrefbrtothefiequencyofoccurrenceof alinguisticinstanceitself,itmayseempossibletoextendthenotionoftypefrequencyto

therichness of environmental contextsin which alinguisticitem can appear・Some

lingulSticitemsmayoccurinavarietyoflingulSticcontextsandothersmayoccuronlyina limitednumberofcontexts・Forinstance,OnthephonologlCallevelofEnglish,theword initialclusterofsounds/sa∋/cantakeatleastsixteendifferentphonemesafterit,Whilethe WOrdinitialclusterofsounds/za∋/canonlytakefourdifferentphonemesafterit・(2)

lfalingulSticitemappearsinavarietyofcontextslike/sae/does,WemaySaythatit has a high distributionaltype frequency・In contrast,ifanitem can appear onlyln a restrictednumberofcontextslike/zee/does,WeCanSaythatithasalowdistributionaltype frequency・ThisextendeddefinitionoftypefrequencylntermSOfdistributionalrichnesshas predictionsthathightypefrequencyguaranteesgeneralizationofitsdistributionalcontexts andthatlowtypefrequencyentrenchesandfreezesitsdistributionalcontexts.

(4)

thedistributionaldifferencesofthetwoJapanesecontracted sounds【kjaeland【mjeelin Japaneseasdiscussedintheprevioussection:While rkjeelis richin distributionaltype

frequency,【mj車】islow. 4.DistributionalTypeFrequencyandSecondLanguageLearning Distributionaltypefrequencydefinedabovedescribesthedistributionalrichnessofa lingulSticiteminaparticularlanguage・Then,itisaninterestlngqueStionwhetherornot distributionaltypefrequencyinthenativelanguageofasecondlanguagelearnerexertsany influenceinthelearnlngOfthetargetlanguage・lnthisregard,itseemspossibletoexplain

the asymmetrical phenomena of the twoJapanese contracted soundslkjaeIIand【mjae]

discussedearlierinthisarticleintermsofdistributionaltypefrequencyofthern.Inother

WOrds,WeCanSupPOSethat,Ontheonehand,itiseasyforJapanese−SPeakinglearnersof

English to apply thelkjae]soundin pronouncing English words becauseit has a high

distributionaltypefrequencyinJapaneseandgeneralization ofits distributionaIcontexts mayalsobeextendedtoEnglish.Ontheother,itisnoteasyforthemtoapplythelmja31 SOundinlearnlngEnglishbecauseithasalowdistributionaltypefrequencyinJapaneseand itsrestrictiveentrenchmentofdistributionalcontextsmayalsorestricttheapplicabilityof thesoundinEnglish.

Based on the argument so far,it may be conceivable that the applicability ofthe Japaneselmjae]soundin English can beincreased by raisingits distributional type

frequency・Thereasoninggoesasfollows:WhileJapaneseqspeakinglearnersofEnglishhave the contracted【mjael soundinJapanese which can potentially be an alternative to the

Englishlm車I sound,the contracted soundislowin distributional type frequencyin

JapaneseandthusitsappIicabilitylSalsorestrictedinlearnlngEnglish,buttheapplicability maybeheightenedbydeliberatelyraislngltStypefrequency.Inthelatterpartofthisarticle, resultsofaquasi−eXperimentfocuslngOnthispossibilityarereported. 5・ClassincationofEnglishWordsBeginnlngwithInitialSingleConsonants+/ae/ BeforegolnglntOtheexplanationofthequasi−eXperiment,itisnecessarytoclassify Englishwordshavingthe/ae/soundjustaftertheinitialslngleconsonantsintofourclasses according to whether or not corresponding similar contracted sounds are availablein JapaneseandwhetherornotthecontractedsoundsareapplicabletoEnglish・

Tablel shows the result of classification・Availability of corresponding similar

COntraCtedsoundsisdeterminedbycheckingthearrayoftheJapanesecontractedsounds

andtheirapplicabilityinEnglishisjudgedonobservationalfacts.

(5)

Japanese(i・e・kya,gya,Cha,ja,Sha)andtheyareeasilyappliedinEnglish・Exarnplesof JapaneseloanwordsfromEnglishsuchaskyanpu,gyqPPu,Chatto,jamu,Shanpuuprovethe applicabilityofthecontractedsoundsinEnglish・ThefourentriesinClassIIallhavethe correspondingsimilarcontractedsoundsinJapanese(i・e・Pya,bya,mya,rya)buttheyare noteasilyappliedin English・NotethatJapaneseloanwordsbelonglngtOthisclassare pronouncedreplacingthe/ae/soundbytheJapanese/a/sound(e・g・Pakku,batto,mattO・ rakku),andtheJapanese/a/soundisalsolikelytobeappliedinprorl0unCingEnglishwords

suchaspack,bat,matand rack.CIassIIIhas sixentrieswith nocorrespondingsimilar

Japanesecontractedsoundsandthusnoapplicability・(3)ThefiveentriesinClassIVare

unlqueinthatallbeginwithconsonantswhicharenotusedinJapaneseandconsequently

theyhavenocorrespondingsimilarcontractedsoundsandnoapplicability・

Tablel C/α∫∫折CαJio〃qfg〝gJ通用伽め風癖血廟印面日通血は軸両C餓叩矧咄+!詑/加

古・/・川、′り、l…f!−J!−f!中。!JJ川J/(J′’Jl′ハ川k・・、t・(一川J…・・旭日一川〃h八。〃(///′t・JJ∴・り一画。・J/−叫、・

C la s s C o m b in a tio n o f V V o rd In itia l A v a ila b ility o f S imi la r A p p lic a b ility o f S imi la r S in g le C o n s o n a n t a n d /ae / C o n tra c te d S o u n d C o n ta c te d S o u n d I !k お /,/g a 〕/,/す詑 !,/匂 お /,/J 記 / Y e s Y e s II /p ぉ /,/b お !,/m ぉ /,/lぉ / Y e s N o III /tぉ /,/d a )/,/n a ∋/,/S 記 /,/Z 8 9 /,/h お / N o N o IV /」お /,/fぉ /,/V ぉ /,/e ぉ /,伯 a e/ N o N o 6.TheExperiment Inordertoexaminetheeffectsofpracticeofrmjae]withitsincreasedtypefrequency,a

quasi.experiment was conductedwith twenty−SixJapanese university students(mostly SOPhomores)majoringelementaryschooleducationintheireightnormalEnglishclassesin thefirstsemester,2007.Thesestudentswerethosenotabsentfromanyoftheeightclasses.

FourdifferentpackagesofmaterialsforpracticewerepreparedutilizlngthreeJapanese WOrds beginningwithlmjEeIl.The common basicidea ofthese activitiesis to raise the

distributionaltypefrequencyoftImjae]bystartingwithoneofthethreeJapanesewordsand thenextendingitintodifferentdistributionaltypeSmakinguseofEnglishwords. Eachofthefouractivitiesconsistedofthreetofourwordstobepracticedfollowlnga Japanesewordintheorderpresentedbelow. Activityl 【mj詑kul→【mj金k](肋C)→【mj会t](mdJ)→[mj金p:】(椚(甲) Activity2 lmjaemma:1→【mj会m](mam)→[mj金nl(man)−→lmj金rlgOUl(mango) Activity3 lmjaesLuko中LuSLUki:]→lmj摩Sl(mass)−→tmj金Jl(mash)一一◆【mj会す](match)

(6)

Activity4

lmjaeku]→【mj由kl(Mac)一→[mj金gl(mag)

→【mj郵I(〝dJ)→ Lmj会d:】(樅ゆ

ItshouldbenotedthatarrangemeTltOfwordsineachactivJtyWaSmadetomakethe transitionofarticulatorymovementsassmoothaspossible・Thesmoothnesswasattainedby keeping the same marlner Ofarticulation(StOp)and transiting the place of articulation consistentlyfrombacktofront(Velar−→alveolar→bilabial)(Activityl),keepingthe samemannerofarticulation(nasal)andtransitingtheplaceofarticulationconsistentlyfrom

fronttoback(bilabial→alveolar→Velar)(Activity2),tranSitingtheplaceofarticulation

graduallyupwardsalongthealveolarridgeandchanglngthemannerofarticulationfrom fricativetoaffricate(Activity3),andturningunvoicedstopstovoicedones(Activity4)・

EachoftheseactivitieswasglVeninthefirstfifteenminutesoftheregularclassfor

ninetyminutes・Ineachactivity,theparticIPantSreCeivedinstructionstoputastressonthe

/ae/soundineachEngJishwordandnottoputanepenthesisatitsendwhilelookingata Sheetofpaperonwhichthesewordswereprintedwiththeirpronunciationrepresentedwith Phoneticalphabets・Theparticipantswereremindedthatthestressmarkonthe/Ee/soundin eachEnglishwordindicatedthatthevowelshouldbepronouncedverystrongly・

The particIPantSinitiallylistenedtothe modelpronunciation ofthe words bytheir teacheronceandthentheyproducedeachwordafterthemodelwhilelookingatthesheet.

TheTltheyreceivedadi鮪rentsheetofpaperonwhichthesamewordswerepresentedwjth

PICtureS reSpeCtively describirlg the words and theylistened to the modelpronunciation OnCearldthentheylmitatedthemodelonce.Afterthat,the particIPantSreCeivedathird SheetofpaperonwhichonlyplCtureSdescribingthewordswereprintedandtheyengaged inpalrWOrkoflistenlngandproducingthesewordslookingatthesheetofpaper・

Importantly,typefrequency ofthelmjae]sourldincreased fromits originalsix to eleveninthesefouractivitiesandtheparticIPantSeXPeriencedthesourldinthesevaried COnteXtSbothreceptJVelyandproductively・Inordertoexaminetheeffectsoftheactivities, threepronunciationtestswereglVemtOtheparticipants.ThefirsttestwasglVenbeforethe treatmentanditcontainedcat,CaP(ClassI,knowntotheparticipants),mat,maP(ClassII, ma−type)andtwootherwordscanopy,CamaS(ClassI,unknowntotheparticipants).The SeCOndtestadministeredafterthefouractivitiescontainedmat,mqP,man,matCh(ClassII, ma−type,praCticed),marry(ClassII,ma−type,nOn−PraCticed),PariS,bad(ClassII, non一ma−tyPe,nOn−praCticed),Sad,hqppenings(ClassIII,nOn−PraCticed)andrqp,jhct(Class IV,nOn−PraCticed)aswellascat,CqP(ClassI).Thethirdtestconductedtwoweeksafterthe SeCOnd testincluded mat,man(ClassII−1,ma−type,praCticed),magic,mannerS,matter (CJassII,ma−tyPe,nOn−PraCticed),andhct(C】assIV,r10n−Pr撒Cticed).

The three pronunciation tests were of the same format and were glVen tO the Participantsinthesamemanner・TheywereinvitedindividuallytoaquletrOOmarldhanded

(7)

asheetofpaper?nWhichfourshortconversationsbetweentwoperSOnSWerePrintedwith respectivepicturesdepictingthescenes・(SeeAppendixA)Theywererequestedtoreadthe COnVerSationsaloud・Eachoftheiroralreadingoftheseconversationswastape−reCOrded.

ThesethreetestswereintendedtoexaminethefollowlngSissues:

(l)WhetherornottheJapanesecontractedsound【kjeeIlisapplicabletoClassIwords

unknowntotheparticipants(canqpy,CamaS)?

(2)Whether or not and to what extent practice of rmjael withitsincreased distributionaltype frequencylS effective for ClassII ma−tyPe WOrds actually

PraCticed(mat,mqP,man,matCh)? (3)Whetherornottheeffectofpracticeoflmjee]isextendedtoClassIIma−type WOrdswhichwerenotpracticed(marry,magic,mannerS,matter)? (4)Whetherornottheeffectofpracticeoflmja∋]isextendedtoClassIInon−ma−type WOrdsbeginningwithsoundcombinationsotherthanma(Paris,bad)andtoClass IIIwords(sad,hqppenings)bothofwhichwerenotpracticed? (5)Whetherornottheeffectofpracticeoflmjae]isextendedtoClassIVwordswhich WerenOtPraCticed(rqp,カct)? Allofthesetestsandactivities(includingFifthActivityforgeneralreview)weregiven inthefollowIngOrderontherespectivedates: FirstTest:19thand26thofApril,2007・ FirstActivity:22ndofMay,2007(Mac→mat→maP) SecondActivity:24thofMay,2007(mam→man→mangO) ThirdActivity:29thofMay,2007(mass→maSh→matCh) FourthActivity:3lStofMay,2007(Mac→mag&mat→mad) SecondTest:5thofJune,2007 FifthActivity:12thofJune,2007(GerLeralreview) ThirdTest:19thofJune,2007 7.ResultsandConclusions

Theresultsoftheexperimentare showninTable2.FromTable2,We Cangetthe followlnganSWerStOthefiveissuespresentedabove: (1)TheJapanesecontractedsound【kjae]isapplicabletoClassIwordsunknowntothe Participants(canqpy,CamaS).Notealthoughthepercentageofpronunciationwith /ae/isnothighforcamas,23%oftheparticIPantSPrOnOunCedtheword/k由mas/. (2)Practiceoflmj記]withitsincreaseddistributionaltypefrequencyiseffectivefor ClassIIma−typeWOrdsactuallypracticed(mat,mqP,man,matCh). (3)EffectofthepracticeismoderatelyextendedtoClassIIma−tyPeWOrdswhichwere notpracticed(marry,magic,mannerS,matter).

(8)

Table2 PeγCe細物ge〆Pro〃〃乃CαJo乃血C〃d物納e/α/∫0〟れd

Ⅵb rd C lass T arget 1SlT e st 2 nd Tb st 3 rd T est N ote C lass I (K now n) CαJ 100 %(52 /5 2) 100 %(52/52) C呼 8 8 %(4 6/52) 9 2 %(24 /2(i) 澗 離 散 耶 勝 研 磨 棚 潤 糟 瀞 研 聯 雄 C lass I (U nkno w ll) C(間呼 γ 7 9 %(4 1/52) C(7〝1α∫ 35 %(18/52) 伯〟 :2 3 %(12!52) 宴 翻 轢 断 饉 闇 泡 1 C lass II m かT y pe (P racticed ) 間〝J 0 %(0/5 2) 7 3 %(38/5 2) 6 9 %(18/2 6) 1乃呼 0 %(0/5 2) 8 1 %(42/52) 〃J〃〃 75 %(39/52) 8 1%(2 1/26 ) 椚αgc力 69 %(36/52) 紺 闇 路 押 馳 鮮 禰 描 旭猷 滅相血路 親 和摘記 流 C la ss II 椚α−T y pe (N o n−praCticed ) 〝1αrJγ 5 8 %(15 /26 ) 〃1αg JC 6 9 %(36/52 ) m α〝〃er∫ 4 0 %(2 1/52 ) J〃付けPr 4 2 %(22/5 2) 濫用漕緒捜箭 舶 載 摘 債 蟻 組 鋸 耕 狛 泥滋胱脱 脂散捕 泌据則餞鱈相磯棚減矧滋諜報馳凱即満露蒲説 瞳路矧溺況隕 柑瑚報謝蒜絹紀闇 経 常纏潤鮮 鼎樹璽 離 C la ss II (N o n,P raCticed ) P t汀f∫ 0 %(0/26 ) あαd 15 %(4/26) ほ き 法 相 鶴 派 揖 貼翫 拙  滞 m 慢乳拙 く 導.、ミ C lass III (N o n−p raCticed) ∫αd 8 %(2/26 ) 短 揮 嘲海 が 0 %(0 /26 ) ぶ 閻 瀧 鮮 甜 謹岩 瀞 餅 瀧 描 C la ss IV (N on−P raCticed) r(甲 8 %(2/26 ) カ タ 8 %(2/26) カ cJ 0 %(0/2 6) (D en o駕 篭 霊 悪 霊 霊 悪 霊 漂 i㌫ 忠 霊 綜 霊 窓 t霊 臨 霊 霊 部 (4)EffectofthepracticeisnotextendedtoClassIInon一ma−typeWOrds(Paris,bad) nortoClassIIIwords(sad,hqppenings).

(5)EffectofthepracticeisnotextendedtoClassIVwords(rqp,jbt,カct).

From the results,We Can COnClude that(1)practice oflmjae]withits/increased

distributionaItypefrequencyiseffectiveforClassIIma−typeWOrdsactuallypracticed,(2) the practiceis also moderately effective for ClassII ma−type WOrds which were not practicedand(3)thepracticeisnoteffectiveforeitherClassIInon−ma,typeWOrds,Class IIIwords,OrClassIVwords.

ThesefindingsmeetwiththegeneralclaimsmadebyproponentsoftheUsageLBased ModelthatlanguagelearnlngprOCeedsitembyitemandthatitisonlylaterandgradually

(9)

thatgeneralizationofanykindbeginstoappear・ Notes (1)Thereareelevencontactedsoundsendingwiththe/a/soundinJapanese(i.e.kya,Sha, Cha,nya,hya,mya,rya,gya,ja,Pya,bya).AccordingtoHattori(1979,pp.132−3),all thesecontractedsoundshavetheglide/j/soundbefore/a/.Thus,the/a!soundinthese COntraCtedsoundsassumesthequalityof/Ee/. (2)/S詑/:∫α如晩∫α⊆,∫α∈edoαJ,∫α血J,∫dd∫伊の,∫α&,∫ααd,∫α辺0控,∫α授d,∫喝も∫呼, ∫αとαわれ4∫β通,∫α壬,∫αとdge;/Zまき/:Zdg,Zα辺如α,Zb生がαれ q臣 (3)Notethat,inJapanese,nyaispronouncedlJlaelratherthanlneelandhyaispronounced l9ae]ratherthanlhae]. Acknowledgment

This paperis a result ofthe research being undertaken as a Collaborative Prqject (PrqjectG)fundedbytheJointGraduateSchool(Ph.D.Program)inScienceofSchooI EdtlCation,HyogoUniversltyOfTeacherEducation.

Refbrences

Hattori,S.(1979)Shin−ban on−in−rOn tO Seisho−hou:Shin nihon,Shikituzurino teishou け!い〃′・いヾ.、・刷!川7ル脚岬/1、、・上\一川・l・tnJ朝日−′・りい、fJJ朝。/J!7川川・…、一・一!リ.り、潮し・、、し・ SPelling).Tokyo:TaishukanShoten.

Jenkins,J.(2000).ThephonologyqFEnglishasaninternationallanguage.Oxford:Oxford UniversityPress.

Makino,T.(2005).Nihonjin no tameno eigoponsei−gaku ressun(Lessons qfEnglish PhoneticsjbrJqpanese).Tokyo:TaishukanShoten.

Matsuzawa,K.(2004).Eigomimi:Hatsuongadekirutorisuningugadekiru(Englishear.・ qyoucanpronounce,thenyoucanlisten).Tokyo:Ascii.

〃肋間0〟gO血行加〃(J呼α乃eJe乃α血服用明押掛沌明勘娩血胱町)(2ndversion).(2000). Tokyo:Shougakkan.

Tomasello,M.(2003).Constructing alanguage:A usage−based theoryqflanguage acquisition・Cambridge,MA:HarvardUniversityPress.

Yamaoka,T.(in press)・Eigo o manabunihongo−WaSha no/ae/no hatsuon gakushuu ni tsuite:Nan−inosetumeitoshidoushishin(Onthelearningofpronunciationofthe/a3/ SOund byJapanese−Speakinglearners ofEnglish:Explanation ofits difficulty and guidelinesforteaching).NihonKyoukaKyouikuGakkaiShi,30(4).

(10)

AppendixA SecondPronunciationTest 1. A:Doyouknowtheman? B:Themaninacap? A:Yes. B:Ofcourse.I’mgolngtOmarryhim. Helovesrapmusic! 2. A:Showmethemaponthedesk. B:Sure. A:Oh,thisisamapofParis. 3. A:Lookatthecatonthemat. B:Oh,it’safatcatonabluemat! A:Yeah,Shemayberemembering thehappenlngSOftheday. 4. A:Howwasthetennismatch? B:Itwasaclosematch.ButIlostit. A:That’stoobad. B:Yes.I’msad.

参照

関連したドキュメント

2.基本モデル 3.通商政策の効果 3−1輸入関税の効果 3−2輸出補助金の効果 3−3輸出自主規制の効果

注5 各証明書は,日本語又は英語で書かれているものを有効書類とします。それ以外の言語で書

[r]

10MODERNJAPANESEFORUNIVERS工TYSTUDENTS PartI亙.C.U.〉 11NAGANUMA'SPRACTICALJAPANESEN,NAGANUMA

 さて,日本語として定着しつつある「ポスト真実」の原語は,英語の 'post- truth' である。この語が英語で市民権を得ることになったのは,2016年

④日常生活の中で「かキ,久ケ,.」音 を含むことばの口声模倣や呼気模倣(息づかい

 「訂正発明の上記課題及び解決手段とその効果に照らすと、訂正発明の本

また適切な音量で音が聞 こえる音響設備を常設設 備として備えている なお、常設設備の効果が適 切に得られない場合、クラ