Lig.IY,
//',t'S,.iF,l,,,,,,,.,,,.,,
l:・",:",a,L,otl.ill'".cf`"A'rl)a"Nd.,Cg:st'"Jc,tl,o,n
,E,nsg,ineering
gdy,g,caf.?ma:x,escifva,th.fi
'
EXPERIMENTAL
STUDIES
ON
CONCRETE
FILLED
SQUARE
STEEL
TUBULAR
SHORT
COLUMNS
SUBJECTED
TO
CYCLIC
SHEARING
FORCE
AND
CONSTANT
AXIAL
FORCE
by
KENJI
SAKINO'
and
HISAYOSHI
ISHIBASHI"
Members
of
A.
I.J.
1.
INTRODUCTION
Tubular
sections, either ernpty orfilled
with concrete, arebeing
increasingly
used as structural rnembers,When
atube
is
actingas
a compression rnember,filling
the
tube
with concreteis
advantageottsbecause
it
increases
the
load-carrying
capacity
withoutincreasing
the
size ofthe
column.
The
senior
author
have
participated
in
the
following
investigations
on concretefilled
square steeltubular
col'umns1
(1)
An
assessment ofthe
state ofthe
art and [esearch on concretefilled
steeLtube
structures]).(
2
)
Elasto-plastic
behavior
of columns subjectedto
constant axialfoTce
and monotonicbending
momenti)3).(3)
Elasto-plastic
behavior
of
columns
subjected
to
constant
axial
force
and
monotonic shearingforce
(see
Fig.
04).
(
4
)
Ultimate
shear strengthof
plain
concrete
columns,
which arethe
component
ofthe
concretefilled
steeltubular
columns,
subjectedto
constant
axialforce
and
monotonicN
shearingforce
S},(5)
Hysteretic
behavior
of columnsfailed
in
flexureM.
In
the
previous
paper`),
it
was clarifiedthat
columns with shear spanto
depth
ratios(alD)
equal
to
or
greater
than
2
failed
in
fLexure
but
columns with shear spanto
depth
ratios equal
to
orless
than1
failed
in
shear.In
this
paper,
an experimental workto
studythe
following
problems
is
described
atfirst.
{1>
Failure
mode ofthe
columns withalD=:1.5.
(2)
Hysteretic
behavior
of short columnsfailing
in
shear.And
an analytical methodto
estimatethe
ultimate strength of short columnsis
discussed
]ater.
It
is
ofimportance
te
investigate
the
mechanicalb
for
practical
reasons.Short
columns commonly appea[in
deep
spandrelbeams
and such cotumns.Even
in
f[ame
systems,the
columns maybe
restraintsintroduced
by
nonstructural elements.2,
EXPERIMENTAL
PROGRAM
Test
specimens-The
rangeof
the
variablesin
the
test
program
was asfollows:(1)
afP,
which
was1.
5
for
monoteniclea
were
tested
under monotonicloading
by
the
senior authorpreviously"].
{2)
wall wiclthto
wallthickness
ratio,Dlt:45,
34
and24;(3)
and
IV6
is
the
nominal axialforce
capacity):betweenO
ando.s.
The
test
program,
whichincluded
21
specimens, wasdivided
into
6
series(see
Table
1).
M
R
Q
a
K
%.R.ll
N
Fig.1
Loading
conditien'
ehavior of short columns not only
for
academicpurposes
but
alsospandrel wall-frame systems which are characterized
by
rendered short
due
to
Lhe
Shear
spanto
depth
ratio,ding
and1
for
cyclicloading
(Columns
withalD
ratios equalto
orless
than
1
Those
results are also utilizedin
this
paper);
NINo
ratio(N
is
the
constant axialforce
applied,The
vaiiableparameters
'Associate
Professor,
Depaitment
ofArchitecture,
Faculty
ofEngineering,
Kyushu
University,
Dr.
Eng.
"
Kumagai
Gumi
Company
LTD,,
M.
Eng.
-81-NII-Electronic Library Service
Table1
Properties
of speclmens and test resu]ts DEIoH
nlo
kr!2t"
u pt
p
h
E
: a{
q
b
h
E
"8
g=i.5
g;i
Menotonic
Loading
Cyc]ic
Leeding Note: al] = shear span rat ±o. t=
thickness of wall.
D]breadth
and depth of steel tube. st[Jy=yield point stre5S・ AIIDimensiens incmou ! tensile strength.
Fer
=
eempress ±ve strength of expansivecencrete cylindei cured tn the mould.
No
= sA sgy + cAd]B.
Fig.2
Details
ofthe
test
specimens andthe
CaOsis.=.eedOMtPorebSeSl"iFSet,r-et"gQtuh
.ef.ietniCmaaSteed
$ChOenaCrrientgefaonrdceh,aSbeen
location
of straingauges
Table2
Mix
proportions
ofconcretebetween
the
series werethe
Dlt
ratioand
the
a7D
ratio, and
the
variableparameter
between
the
specimens
in
each
series
wasthe
NIN,
ratio.All
specimens
were10
em
by
10
cm
in
cross
sections.
The
externaldimensions
ofthe
specimens areshown
in
Fig.2.
Materials-The
concrete mixproportions
are shownin
Table
2.
Expansive
cement containing15
percent
of expansive cemponent was usedin
orderto
p[event
separation at
the
interface
ofthe
encased concrete andthe
steeltube
due
to
shrinkage ofthe
concrete.Tubes
were cotd worked welded mild steel, and alltubes
were annealedto
remove Tesidual stressesin
their
cross sections.Mechanical
properties
obtained
from
coupontests
areshown
in
Table
].
Experimental
apparatus
and
procedure-A
test
set-up
is
shown
in
Fig,
3.
The
loacling
apparatus
wasdesigned
to
reproduce
the
basie
force-deformation
pattern
of
columnsshown
in
Fig.
].
Details
Qf
the
loading
apparatusand
'
J
'1
tDsoyffuFe'AxialForee, SeTtesSpectmemgD{III)Tttofl(=an=f)(::l>(ge".2'N(ton)NNoQu(ton) ISLS-28,9O.188.3S
ISLS-Sl,5-3LS2,20452,9]3.8420913.3O.28B.31 ISI5-S.MSI.5-2 22204 10,1O.1910.97MSLSMSI.S-3MSI,S-SLS2.9Sl342.964.ll22S16,126.SO.2SO.4711.38ln.L3
IVSI,S-2 14.0O.1917.05 IVSI.SIVSI.S-3L54,25243.224.4722521.1O.2915:41 IVSI.5-S35.1O.471476
ClSl-O 214o.sO.Ollo.2e CISICISI-2C[Sl-312,21453.043.93ISO8.S12.SO.19O.2Sie,39iO.6] CISI-S21.3O.479,75
CMSI-OJ
26eO.5O,Ol14.04CMSICMSI-2CMSI-312.96'342.944.10t-1699.714.5O.19O.28l2.S3l2.76
CMSI-S 24,1O.4711.40 CIVSI-O260D.5O.OlIS.53
crvs!CIVSI-2CIVSI-3CIVSI-514.23242,96l4・o221611].O19.S32.5O.19O.28O.47n.es17.99j.7.22 TestSer ±es wi(7.)Watetc3k3)ExpansivecementcXs)Samd(3k,)Cearseaggregate(geke)SlumpCcm) 1Sl.S,MSLS,IVSLS clSlCMSI,CIVSI696969
21220S20S30S297301B91904906
9e79209226.]8.86.9
-82
/t
/tli' a--・
`
E'
K
@@
Ii
1・
p''
[l!lflli
'
±
lego1b'
/tQ,:
sso@
±
...
e:,1:eee
.It't:";-st'
-(D-・g';-i-;"'l",.'ltL
@
'''
-''.
7"',,,o
,,,/e
t.to
'...l・.
:
'l..-..eeee
0101
tt
t
'.bl...'
-":]
@
ltlOO
@
ii8o
1150-'403400450L.t.
1200Eil:::e.;:::,
@Hydrdul
±cAll
Oimensions
in@Deub!e
Aating Hydreulic Jack@toed
Cell(!)Spheiical
Ball BearingBall Hearing
@Rellers
OParellel
Supperting Mechanism TesL ±ng Nachine@Vpper
Rigid Beam@
Lcr-er Rigid BeanFig.3
Test
set-upmm
i
stPA1/tpt1"1ut11,iLrv
R(%}
inst[umentation
aregiven
in
Ref.
4.
The
loading
program
in
case
ofcyclic
loading
is
shownin
Fig.4.
3.
EXPERIMENTAL
RESULTS
-1
'i
Q-translation
angleR
Telationships are shownin
Fig.s.
Initiatien
points
of visually ob$eTvedlocal
buckling
and
yielding
ofthe
steeltube
Fig.4
Loading
program
are also
ifidicated
in
the
figure.
Crack
pattems
of
the
encased concrete were observedby
cutting and removingthe
half
ofthe
steeltube.
The
typical
crackpatterns
of coiumns with alD ratiosof1
andl.s
are comparedin
Fig.
6.
The
diagonal
crackingobserved
in
the
shorter columnsis
notbbserved
in
the
case
of
the
more slender col.umns,in
whichplastic
hinges
aredeveloped
at
its
ends;
the
failure
mode ofthe
columns withalDt=1.s
is
consideredte
be
flexural
failure.
Coiumns
with
a!D=1
(cyclic
loading)-The
shearing
force-translation
angle relationships are shownin
Fig.
7.
As
shewnin
this
figure,
a considerableamount
of
energy ab$orptionis
avai!ablein
any ofthese
cases.For
high
axialloads
(NIN,#O.5),
hysteretic
loops
becarne
stable only after a certain amount
of
the
degradation
in
the
shear resistancetook
place.
However,
anincrease
in
the
shear resistance,due
to
cyclicloading
atlarge
displacement
levels,
was ob$erved..The reasonfor
this
phenomenon
is
that
the
square.section
gradual-ly
became
a circular sectionin
the
upper andlower
critical regions(see
Fig,6
c)due
to
the
N
v
I
gal
:;S=O.6PIain
Conciete Cotumn S] Ce}Fig.6Typical
encased<
rwi
g,
Yt
'=・
o.]Monetonic
" Concrete tb)crackconcrete a5-L5.r/h,'.L
i11
i
i/tt/ttttt
[
MILedSteebpatterns
of columns"t・EO.2
Cycllc Tubutsr CeLumns(c)the
plain
JfJL Xv x.(l'
11
tDlt.4S)
concrete"'t
...`t
i'lt.-.-・Nlto.soNMenotonic
ki) andthe
le
Q8{ton)E
ri
10
Q8tten)
fi
ii
[SL5-2
ICt=O.18e=45
12]"S
.RC%}
llSL5-3
E
-.=O.28
?;45
]
t.'FF'''rT
Q(ton}
1
l?]US
-R
(%)
6]
-R
[%}
o Inttiiltion of tacsl Euckling of sive Flange ef Stee] Tube ilt the Seetten 1.Scu Fnr From tbe Ce]umn
Fig.5
12
IOQCton)
6
12
Q{
±on)t
ct9n)
T
MSL5-2
IC
=O.19!}t34
121012le
1
25
-R{%)
MSL5-3
4567i
L.=o,2e
9=34
12]
.RC%}
M$L5-5
4S5]TSI./=o,47
?=34
.Rc%)
rube Mmnge . :nitiatien 1.icm fur frem the Colunn
]Bvckltng
of Yield PeintQ15Cton)10
t
Q
NsLs-2{lfd-O.lg?s24
o
1E
.1
l23456]
20l5
.R(%)
XSL5-SIG:=o.2g
?=24
Cten)10
ti
123"56
.R,C%)
msr.s-s
ISL,=o.47
?=24
2n15
Qtten)
10
i:
12S45E
-R(%)
Steel Tube Web tYield Peint of
Compres-of TensiLe FLange of SLeal Tuba at the SectlOn
T
Stee] oE Lecal
Soction End"
End Y Web at Mid-Height
Shearing
force
Q-translation
angleR
relationships(a!D=1.
5}
7
-83-NII-Electronic Library Service
CISt-OQtson) r 10-s atb-1ottt"sHthaljO 4 1
-s2'-1
R(%)--p
cusF2QCten)10e '-0t].1Otti"SW"owo,1 f'-32't'
d2L3iR(WI.rr.!'
'-Te".-,E
-T
clsbsO(ton)le elD.1ntt-SHt"oop.l6
1't -/ 1-J 1 5 ' 'RiSOir]ri'
1-5
CZSF5Q
Cton),e
'-.i
on-11Ttt.'/
Dlt-4Snyreo-o,s'1
g1
m2
'11
5-2-1 i 21 .-RCOnt-1/ 24/;-F
L,'1
1//''
L r1'・
IL・1.
'
t/ 1 emsi-oQ(ton)
r'-`t・ F2-ri
LT-r--10u-..nmil-:1.
ott""'/I'"
rNrVoeO-P;.
/1,
4IL'---
-L
/1 4''Ilm.' H--'ttt
52G.・--l-rt
./1////L
''
,R(%)-/l=I1T1
'
'[
iL.--l--t --・-l /tny-10
LL
--12
CtSt-2
Q(ton)
cu・st-oQ(ton}
"-I1'tt--x)-15 r'
-orbEl-nttfT4NiHorOt-.'..t..-tT..
s..t'rt1 52-1 lR{Ssi
-t
'tttt
-15-L.-5
CNSI・2Q(ton)
T-otDslr'Oki2qHtHtrnyO,2/tlfi,.-t-IS
-T
5 ,RC7S)
''-'
2tt'JL-cmsi-sQ"en)
T--・rcmsi-sQton]g'.TT
rT--i-Trti2
li]'
LT.-
IO7Tt-t
[--・
,ot]-1ntt-2-HtNoro.i[-
-.t..
]1
LoiD[1blt.]/ewee]o,]
1tt-tt'
"-/1
4-1
1ttl
Ft--kr+.
'
''tttt
/'
/ 52-41''
-5.Roo
・oIt
'
r
:-3.il}UI
-2・1IL
Roo
.t.
r-'-HtF.
÷---・g
1・.r./
:
''
/1ttT-ttil+r/1
.-t.tTt
.=.
'
ttt
tt
-..t'
/ttA1 1.t'''
11..-t.
1 A.I-20
cmsi-sQ(ton)
iiFFLiU-12ro
F'TT-L.--atD-iIDrc=ilt.s
lltt- E'tt' HtHo=O,5'1[1-llmT".'
/t 3-2-1Oll r5 /iB.S?iig-'
v・
nt.'
'
1//12 cest-sQ(ten).t..r2o..
T'ofD"1O/T.24kVHo-O.S'il./
-ttt'
'-ttL,
tt.1/l..//,
52ll-1 l・F
t
tt
tt''-5・/zL"1
-Res)-l'
"1
."TL.-..
+1--].-L.2ttt
Fig,7
Shearing
ferce
Q-t[anslation
angleR
relationshipslocal
buckling
ofthe
flanges
and webs, andthis
t[ansformed
ciicular steeltube
containedthe
encased concrete rnore effectivelythan
the
square steeltube,
To
investigate
the
effect of shear spanto
depth
ratio onthe
hystereti'c
behavior
ofthe
columns,the
relationshipsbetween
the
non-dimensional shearingforce
atthe
un]oadingpoints
andthe
correspondingtranslation
angtes
are shownin
Fig.
8
for
the
columns withDlt=45
in
whichthe
degradation
ofthe
shear resistancedue
to
cyclicloading
was mostprominent,
The
failure
mode ofthe
co!umns withalD=1
was considered as sheaTfailure
asdescribed
later,
andthat
ofthe
columns withalD=:[2
and3
asflexural
failure6i.
As
shownin
Fig.
8,
the
cyclicdeterioration
ofthe
columnsfailing
in
shear wasless
than
that
ofthe
columnsfailing
in
flexure.
This
noticeable resultwas consistentin
the
columns withDlt==34
and24.
4.
ULTIMATE
STRENGTH
OF
THE
SHORT
COLUMNS
The
concretefMed
steeltubutar
columnis
a composite membercornprised
ofthe
steel andthe
concrete').
M.
Wakabayashi
andK,
Minami
have
preposed
an analytical methodto
estimatethe
ultimatestrength
ofsueh
composite
members.
This
method, which was consideredto
be
extension of an analyticat methodproposed
by
B,
Kato
andR.
Shohara
for
concrete
encased
steel
coluTnns9),
wasproved
to
be
applicableto
many
type$
of composite members-84-LO
e.s
8u
r
7/
.
g=i
.Nt'O・2 e8=s
e o.s 1. -R{%)
1.et2.
O.5gQuT
"rfi'X+r
iii.S.
;i!k:o.3oO
O.5 -R(%}
p.ot;i
egeiD
+8-, O&-5`I.o1.52.02.j O.5QouT
rtr+
+
×
---
-e-
'i
.r
D:tJkO・5
tg-2
e
g-s
--tet2,
Fig.8
O
O.5 1.0 1.52,O
2,5
-RC%}
Nondimensiona[
shearingforce
at unioadlngpoint
QIQu-translatien
ang[eR
relationshlpsDlt=45
(Comparison
between
the columnsfailing
in
shear(a!D
=1)
and the columnsfailing
in
flexure
(alD=2
anfl3)S])
sNsM-t't'Xso1ebrb1111'J1 rljldd11SHsPDAsQ<I:J}-sM{
sN sNt,H-E6?i-M
'SabN
,
Fjg.9
,-fik-fixM
mh
LOriil
Assumed
stressdistributions
in
steet tubef[anges
andwebs
(by
TanakaiO))
force
and a more sirnplified admissibie stressfield
is
assumed.be
shownin
the
numerical examplespresented
for
comparingthe
analytical and experimental results.the
"lowerbound
theorem"
ofthe
limit
analysis,Eq.1
and strength ofthe
steeltubular
column on conditionthat
the
plastic
de
Ultimate
strength
of
the
encased
concrete
column-Accord
Kato,
the
ultimate strengthexpressed
in
the
non-dimensionafailing
in
shear offlexure3).
According
to
this
method,the
ultimate strength ofthe
concretefilted
$teeltubular
columns can
be
obtainedby
addingthe
strengths ofthe
steel
tubular
column
andthe
encased concrete column.In
this
section, animproved
rnethod willbe
proposed.
Differences
amongthree
methodsproposed
by
B.
Kato
'
et al,,
M.
Wakabayashi
et al. andthe
authois, arein:
<
l
>
Methods
to
estimatethe
ultimate strengths of
the
steeltubular
column anclthe
encased conc[etecolumn.
(2)
Methods
to
addthese
strengths.At
first,
methodsfor
estimatingthe
ultirnate strengthsof
the
steel
tubular
column andthe
encased concretecolumn
aredescribed.
Ultimate
strength
ot
the
steel
tubular
column-The
ultirnate
strength ofthe
steeltubular
column underthe
loading
condition shownin
Fig.1
is
given
by
Eq.1,
which was obtainedby
a
limit
analysisin
whiehthe
following
assumptions were rnade]O).(])
The
shearing stress. .T.,is
uniformlybuted
in
the
webs as shownin
Fig.9.
(2)
Thenormalstresses.a.M,
and.a.N, causedbybending
moment, .M., and axialforce,
.Ai.,respectively, are uniformly
distributed
as shownin
Fig.9.
(3)
The
yield
conditionis
given
by
Eq.2.
sq =21s
(in
case of2.n+4.i.qso
(3+4.di).qi+4.asn.q-2sE.q.-sn+sn!=O
(in
case of2.n+4.a.q)1)4.Esq}
(3+16.Ei).qZ-8.d.q+sn!+-43-=O
{in
case of4.a.q21)
・・・''''''''''''''''''''''''''(
]
)
wheresQu
a
sNsn==.N,,
sq!.lvh, sa=.D, sNo=4t(D-t).av .av=yield
point
stress ofthe
steeltube.
3srw2+sawM2+sawN2=sar・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・(2}
In
Wakabayashi's
methocl, almost sameequation
asEq.
1
is
used,even
though
the
expression
is
clifferent,
In
Kato's
rnethod,the
steeltubular
column, whose .ais
larger
thah
O.
866
Dl.D,
is
assumed notto
carry axia!The
difference
between
Kato's
method andEq,
1
willAccording
to
Kato's
methodgive
the
Lower
bound
for
the
ultimateformation
capacity ofthe
steeltube
is
adequate.ing
to
the
rnethodSproposed
by
Wakabayashi
and
1
shearingforce
term
ofthe
encased concrete celumn-85-NII-Electronic Library Service
i.o
g.l.o
cDARI
conciete cotumn assumed
in
Wedge
Theory
interaction cttrvesfor
the
{by
Suenaga,
et al.M} encased concrete columns underthe
loading
condition shownin
Fig,
1,
canbe
given
by
Eq.
3
whichis
obtained
from
the
admissible stressfield
shownin
Fig.
10
a.According
to
the
"lowerbound
theorem",
Eq.
3
gives
the
lower
bound
for
the
ultimate strength ofthe
encased concrete column,On
the
otherhand,
Eq.
4
is
obtainedby
assumingthe
stressblock
shown
in
Fig,
10
b,
in
whichthe
effectof
the
shearingforce
is
ignoTed.
cq= cn(1-cn)+ca2-.d・・・--"---・・-・・・---・-・・・--・-・-・・・---・・---・・-・-・---・-{3)
cq=2,1-a cn(1-en)''-'"''"""-''-'""'"--'"''""'''"""H-"-''"HH"'-''"'"--"-""-'"'"'"'""v'"(
4
)
where.IV .Q.
a
cn=71mv6, cq=cNo, cU=cD, cNo=cDl.aB
.aB=icompressiye strength of
the
encasecl concrete.In
the
experiments onthe
plain
concrete shoTt columns undeTthe
loading
condition shownin
Fig.
1,
it
was reportedthat
the
following
three
failure
modes were observed5),(
1
)
shearfailure-Thediagonal
tension
crack extendsin
thedirection
ofaline
joining
both
compressive regionsof
column
ends(see
Fig.
6
a).
Failure
occurs
simultaneouslywith
the
formation
of
this
diagonal
tension
crack(see
Fig,
6
a).(
2
)
pest
flexura]
crack-shearfailure-The
diagonal
crack
pattern
andfailure
mechanism ofthis
failure
mode aresimilar
to
those
of
the
shear
failure.
{3)
flexural
failure-The
large
horizontal
displacement
due
to
widening offlexural
c[acks atthe
endsoccvrs
without
the
formation
ofthe
diagonal
crack.It
was also reportedthat
the
diagonal
tension
crackingload
is
larger
than
the
shearingforce
given
by
Eq.
3
and canbe
given
by
Eq.5,
.q=SI(ci-2cacD+
4(2cdci+c2)cn-4cn2+<cT-2cEct)'1
(incaseofcn>2c]ca)
--・--・-・・-・----・(
5
)
lcn
cq--2,a
"n
CaSe Of cn<2cicE・・-・・・・-・flexural
failure)
where c,=O.1109, c!=O.7680
Eq.
s
was obtainedfrom
the
"WedgeTheory"
proposed
by
Suenaga
andIshimaruii),
in
whichthe
failure
mechanism andthe
yield
conditionfor
the
concrete shownin
Fig.11
were assumed.Fig.12
shows acomparison
amengthe
axialload-shearing
force
interaction
curvesgiven
by
Eqs.3,
4
ands.
Experimenta!
results5) onthe
ultimate strength ofthe
plain
concrete short columns are alsoplotted
in
Fig.12.
Ultimate
strength
ofthe
concretefilled
steel
tubular
column-According
to
Kato's
method,the
ultimate
strength
of
the
cencrete
filled
steel
tubular
column
is
estimatedby
the
"SimpleSuperposed
Strength
Method"
foi
the
columns whoseal.D
ratiois
larger
than
O.
866
.DID, andis
given
by
Eq.6.
N=!cN
Qu==sQtt+cQu-''h''-'"H''""-'""H"HHH""""H--'H-"'''-H"h-''"'''-H---"''"''(6)
where cQ.
is
given
by
Eq.
3,
ancl subscriptss
andc
indicate
forces
ca[riedby
the
steeltubular
column andthe
encased concrete column, respectively.
Wakabayashi
et al.proposed
to
usethe
"ExtendedSuperposed
Strength
Method"iL'),
in
whichEq.7
is
utilized.N=sN+cN
Qu=sQu+cQu"1"'''--'''-"''"H-"'H''H'H--''"""H''"'''-"''"''H'H'''''-'''-(7)
Where
,Q.is
given
by
Eq.
1
ancl ,Q.is
given
by
Eq.
3.
The
value of eachterm
appearingin
the
righthand
side ofEq,
7
shourdbe
taken
in
such awaythat
the
absolute value ofthe
yectorgiven
by
IV
andQ
becomes
maximum.The
rnethodproposed
in
this
paper
is
similarto
Wakabayashi's
method exceptthat
Eq,
5
is
usedto
estimatethe
ultimatestrength
of
the
encased
concrete
cotumninstead
ofEq.3.
Comparison
between
analytical
and
experimental
results-Fig.
13
showsthe
cornparison
between
analytical
and experimental resultsfor
columns with alD ratio$equal
to
orless
than
1.
5.
The
experirnentar
results`)for
columns
with
alDS1.
0
subjectedto
monotonic shearingforce
are also shownin
Fig.
13
a-j.The
following
analytical resuitsare also
included
in
Fig.
13
a-j.{1)
UItimate
strengths
ofthe
encased
concrete columnsgiven
by
Eqs,3
and5.,
<2}
Ultimate
strength ofthe
steeltubular
columnsgiven
by
Eq.1.
(
3
)
Ultimate
strengths
ofthe
concretefiiled
steeltubular
columns obtainedby
the
thiee
methodsproposed
by
Kato,
Wakabayashi
and allthors.(
4
)
Ultimate
strength olthe
concretefilled
steeltubular
colttmnsgiven
by
Q=M,.la,
whereM,.,
is
the
ultimate moment calculated
by
asimpteptastic
theory
propased
in
Ref.
2,
in
which rectangularstress
blocks
di
for
concrete and steel were assttmed.This
ultimate strengthis
referredto
asthe
flexural
strengthhereafter,
In
calculatingthe
analytical strengths,the
compressive strength, cae, ofthe
encasecl
concrete
has
been
taken
as
1.2
times
ofthe
cornpressive s!rength of expansive concrete cylinder curedin
the
mouldZM).Following
conclusions canbe
drawn
from
Fig.
13
a-j.'
(1)
The
lower
bound
of experimental resultsis
estimatedby
the
analyticalniethods
proposed
by
Kato
or
Wakabayashi
in
all cases.(
2
)
To
estimatethe
ultimate strengthof
the
short column more accurately,the
methodprop6sed
in
this
paper
can
be
used.(
3
)
The
ultimate strength ofthe
columns withalD=1.
5,
'which
failed
in
flexure,
arelaTger
than
the
analytical
flexural
strength.Detinition
of
shear
tailure-According
to
the
definition
given
by
Kato
orWakabayashi,
the
failure
mode of a]1the
columns
described
in
this
paper
is
notL`shear
failure"
but
"flexuralfailure"
since
that
both
flanges
ofthe
steeltube
yielcled
atthe
ultimate state.According
to
the
author'sdelinition,
however,
the
failure
mode of allthe
columnsdescribed
in
this
paper
is
"shearfailure"
since
the
encased concretecolumns
failed
in
shear.Obviously,
the
definition
of"shear
faiLure"
is
debatable.
Limitations
ofthe
proposed
method-Asdiscussed
previously,
in
case of'columns
with alD=1.5, significantdiagonal
tension
cracking
ofthe
encased
concrete was notobserved.
However,
the
failure
mechanism shownin
Fig.
11
was assumedin
orderto
obtainEq,
5,
According
to
the
"upperbound
theorem",
the
ultiTnate strengthof
the
encased concTete column
is
overestimatedby
Eq.5
for
the
co}umns with afD=:1.5.Consequently,
the
application
of
the
proposed
methodshovld
have
limitations.
In
this
paper,
following
limitations
areproposed.
(1)
O.5galDSI.5
The
reasonsfor
this
limitation
are asfo]lows:
i)
Eq.5
was experimentallyproved
onlyfor
this
range5).ii
)
The
proposed
methodgives
the
ultimate shear strength similarto
the
flexural
strengthfor
the
coLurnns itTith-87-NII-Electronic Library Service
I.5
Xx
1.08
to
Nx
`/
1t
×
×
"''L-k:Ol;9/t
Nnm6tif;eFvD
Quq=
D2ctrn-.
KATe---
WAKABAYASHI AUTHORS FLEXURAL STRENGTH e MoNoToNIC LeADtNG O CYCLIC LOADtNG1.5
1,O
nO'5io
n
t
1.5
'' ID ' O.5o
O.4.--oqto]
g=o.s3
y-q(big.Lo"45
L5
--bq
Cc}o5"bPO.4O.Ge-54
1,5 IPqsnTlo
O.4
?=44
op
-.q
(d)
g=,,oO.6
QP
DTU24
ke)
g=Le+45
o
eq<h)
g#i.5
Fig.13
og?r45Comparisons
LO
nO'5
1
o -,5p
oon
t
-qCf)8nto
xxt[
NLf'
sxxoA
es34e.6
o
.qci)
between
the
oAa6
g=L5
?=54
experimental nT
t.5
IPO.1
ultirnateo
cg)
8t.o
?=24
7.r"q
(j)
g-L5
strengths andos
DT=24analytical
oS onesalD
=1.5(see
Fig,13
h-j),
iii
)
Almost
aLlthe
experimental ultimate strengths ofthe
columns with alD==1.5 arelarger
than
the
shear$trengths
given
by
the
prepo$ed
method,though
the
strength ofthe
encased concrete colurnnis
overestimatedby
Eq.
5.
0ne
ofthe
reasonsfor
this
is
that
the
ultimate strength ofthe
steeltubular
columnis
underestimatedby
Eq.1.
(2)
Nllv,Ko,s,
plts4s
The
validity ofthe
"Extended
Superposed
Strength
Method"
was expeTimentallyproved
on]yfor
these
rangesin
this
paper,
It
is
consideredthat
these
limitations,
exceptDltS45,
do
not causeinconvenience
to
practical
design
apptications.
It
is
observedto
be
necessaryto
extendthe
experimentalinvestigation
to
short columns wiLhIarger
Dlt
ratios(thinner
steeltubes).
5.
CONCLUSIONS
The
following
conclusions are reachedbasecl
onthe
experimentalinvestigatien
utilizing small scaletest
specimens.
(
1
)
The
decrease
in
the
shear resistancedue
to
cyclicIoading
was morepiominent
for
columRs withlarger
wallwidth
to
wallthickness
ratios andhigher
axial
forces.
After
acertain
amount
of
decrease
in
the
shear
resistance
of
the
highly
axial
loaded
columns
(NllVh#O.
5>
took
place,
their
hysteretic
loops
became
stable
and an
increase
in
the
shear resistancedue
to
cyclicloading
atlarge
displacement
levels
was observed.The
cyclic
cleterioration
ofthe
short columnsfailing
in
shear wasless
than
that
ofthe
columnsfailng
in
flexure.
(2)
The
ultimate strength of columns whose shear spanto
depth
ratiois
less
than
1.5
canbe
estimatedby
the
analytic.al method
preposed
in
this
paper.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The
autho'rs are verygrateful
to
Professor
M,
Tomii
ofKyushu
University
for
his
helpful
guidance
and usetul suggestions.The
authors aLso wishto
thank
Dr.
A.
E.
Aktan'ofUniversity
ofCatifo[nia,
Berkeley,
forhis
editorial asslstance,REFERENCES
O
Tomii,
M.
,Matsui,
C.
andSakino,
K.
,
"Concrete
Filled
Steel
Tube
Stiuctufes,"
Proceedings
ef the
National
Conference
en
the
Planning
andDesign
ofTatl
Buiidings,
Tokyo,
Japan,
ASCE-IABSE,
August,
1973,
z}
Tomii,
M.
andSakino,
K.,
"ExperimentalStudies
onthe
Ultirnate
Moment
ofConcrete
Filled
Square
Steel
Tubular
Beam-Colurnns,"
Transactions
ofthe
Architectural
Institute
ofJapan,
No.275,
Jan.,
1979.
3}
Tomii,
M.
andSakine,
K.,
"Elasto-Plastic
Behavior
ofConcrete
Filled
Square
Steel
Tubular
Bearn-Columns,"
Transactions
ofthe
Architectural
Institute
ofJapan,
No,280,
June,
1979.
4)
Tomii,
M.
andSakino,
K.
,"Experirnental
Studies
enConcrete
Filled
Square
Steel
Tubular
Beam-Columns
Subjected
to
Monetonic
Shearing
Force
andConstant
Axial
Force,"
Transactiong
ofthe
Architectural
Institute
ofJapan,
No.
281,
July,
]979.
5)
Tomii,
M.,
Sakino,
K.
andKiyohara,
K.,
"ExperimentalStudies
onPlain
Concrete
CoLumns
Subjected
teMenotonic
Shearing
Force
andConstant
Axial
Foice,"
Transactions
of theArchitecturat
Institute
ofJapan,
No,
307,
Sept.,
1981.
6)
Sakino,
K.
andTomii,
M.,
"Hysle[etic
Behavioi
ofConcrete
Filled
Square
Steel
Tubular
Beam-CoLurnns
Failed
in
Flexure,"
Transactions
of theJapan
Cencrete
Institute,
Vol.3,
Dec.,
1981.
7)
Wakabayashl,
M.,
"CompositeStructures
in
Architecture,"
Concrete
Journal,
Japan
Cencrete
Institute,
No.219,
Dec.,
1983.
(in
Japanese)
8)
Wakabayashi,
M.
andMinami,
K.
,"Rational
Analysis
of
Shear
in
Structural
Concrete
Columns,"
Disaster
Prevention
Research
Institute
Annuals,
Kyoto
University,
No.24B-l,
April,
1981.
(in
Japanese)
.
9)
Kato,
B.
andShohaia,
R.
, "Strength ofSteel-Reinfored
Concrete
Members,"
Transactlons
of theArchitectural
Institute
ofJapan,
No.266,
April,
1978.
"n
Japanese)
10)
Tanaka,
H.
,
"Proposalof
Design
Fermulae
ofRequired
Web-Thickness
ofBearn-Column
Connectiens,"
Transactiens
efthe
Architectural
Institute
ofJapan,
No.207,
May,
1973.
Il}
Suenaga,
Y.
andIshimaru,
R.
, "KinematicAnalysis
ofConcrete
Members
Under
Combined
Stresses-Part
4-,
"T[ansactiens
of the
Architectural
Institute
ofJapan,
No.221,
July,
1974.
(in
Japanese)
12)
Wakabayashi,
M.,
"AProposal
for
Design
Formulas
of
Composite
Columns
andBeam-Cotumns,"
Prellminaty
Report
ef