The Japanese Psychonomic Society
NII-Electronic Library Service
TheJapanesePsychonomic Society
7ke
la)anF/se
JLnirvtat
of
Rv,clwnomicSc'ience
2UOZ,Vol.Zl,No. 1,45-46
Prizewinner's
SummaryP-IB-35
The
effect
of
sharpness
of
a
knife
on
a
Wataru
OuE*,
Natsuko
ONuMA'*,
Yashio
UcHiNo"
Fb7z]nsic
Science
Labovato?o'
Saga
Pwfectttrtzl
Ilolice
Hbadeuarters*
weapon
focus
and
Yuji
HAKODA"*
and
Kyushu
Uiniversits,"
The
present
study
wasdesigned
to
investigate
the
relationshipbetween
a
weaponfocus
and
aphysical
feature
of a weapon,that
is,
whether a sharpknife
attracts more attentionthan
a not-sharpknife.
Sixty
participants
watcheda
cooking
scene
depicted
in
pictures
where a womanheld
one ofthree
items
: a sharpknife,
a not-sharpknife,
or adetergent
spray.A
weaponfucus
effect
wasmeasured
as
recognition
ofthe
centralinformation
related
to
the
knife
er
spray.
In
the
three
conditions recognition ofthe
centralinformation
wasbetter
for
the
sharpknife
conditionthan
for
the
other
conditions.
This
resultsuggests
that
a
weapon
focus
can
be
produced
by
the
'
sharpness ofaknife,
'
Key
words
:
weapon
focus
effect,
sharpness,
emotion,
eyewitness
testimony
The
weaponfocus
effect(called
aWFE
in
the
following)
is
aphenomenon
thut
an eyewitness remembers wellthe
details
about a weaponin
a crimebecause
the
witness's attention wasfocu$ed
onthe
weapon.
However,
mostof
the
previous
studies
about
the
WFE
have
nat
distinguished
between
the
presence
of
a
weapon
and
the
emotion
evoked
by
acrime
(Mass
&
Kohnken,
1989).
These
two
factors
shouldbe
discussed
independently
because
recent studieshave
suggested
that
emotion
is
nota
factor
necessaryfor
occurrence of a"JFE
(Pickel,
1999).
The
present
studytherefore,
focused
on aphysical
feature
ofa
weapon,that
is,
the
sharpness
of aknife.The
purpose
of
this
study wasto
investigate
whetherthe
degree
ofsharpness
effected
the
WFE.
The
participants
viewed a sequence ofpictures
vLThichdepicted
afemale
target,
with aknife,
in
akitchen.
This
scene was used sethat
it
would noteveke
an
emotional
state
in
the
participants,
Because
aknife
was consistent with akitchen,
the
situation
*
Forensic
Science
Laboratory
Saga
Prefectural
Police
Headquarters,
Matsubara
1-1-16
Saga,
840-8540
"
Department
of
Behavior
andHealth
Sciences,
Graduate
School
ofHuman-Environment
Studies
Kyushu
University,
IIakozaki,
IIigashi-ku,
kuoka,
812-8581
was regarded as usuar.
The
kind
ofknife
was varied sothat
the
sharpness ofthe
knife
cou]dbe
rnanipulat-ed.For
a sharp conditionthe
female
had
a sharpknife,
such
as a slicer, whereasin
a not-sharpcondi-tion
she
had
a
not-sharp
knife,
such
as
a
vegetable
cleaver.
In
addition,
there
was
a
control
condition
wherethe
female
had
a
detergent
sprpy.
The
sharp-ness explanationpredicts
that
recognition perfor-mancefer
detail
information
aboutthe
knife
in
the
sharp
condition
wQuldbe
better'than
in
the
not-sharp condition.
Methods
Participants
Sixty
university students(32
malesand
28
females)
served
as
participants.
Stimulus
The
stimulus consistecl of a series ofeight colored
pictures
that
depicted
the
same event exceptthat
in
the
fifth
picture
the
womanhad
eithera
sharp
knife,
a
not-sharp
knife
er
a
detergent
spray.
The
first
four
pictures
showed
ayoung
man walkingtowards
an apartrnent,The
fifth
picture
showed
that
he
has
opened adoor
and met a womanin
a
kitchen
whohad
aknife.
The
rest ofthe
pictures
showedthat
they
had
pastry
in
adining
room.Procedure
The
participants
were seated at adi$tance
ofO.75
rnetresfrom
a
21-inch
CRT
display.
The Japanese Psychonomic Society
NII-Electronic Library Service
The JapanesePsychonomic Society
46
The
Japanese
Journal
ofPsychonomic
Science
Vol.21,
Mood
Adjective
checklist(JUMACL;
Shirasawa
&
others,
1999)
which measures energetic andtense
'
arousaT.
Because
tense
arousalis
known
to
be
a'negative
ernotion,
the
JUMACL
was
giv6n
to
partici-pants
before,
and
after,
watching
the
pictures
in
order
to
evaluate
their
emotienal
state.
After
completingthe
first
JUMACL
the
pictures
were
presented
onthe
display
at a rate of6
secondsper
picture
with a2
seconds
inter-picture
interval.
Immediately
afterthat
the
participants
were askedto
again checkthe
JUMACL.
They
werethen
given
afour-alternative
recognition
test
about
the
pictures.
The
questions
asked mainly about central and periph-eralinformation
in
the
fifth
picture.
The
central
information
was spatially associated withthe
items
the
womanhad
whereasthe
peripheral
information
was not.
Results
and
Discussion
The
scoresfor
the
first
ancl secondJUMACL
test
for
'variance
tense
arousal were analyzedfirst.
An
analysis ofwith a
design
of3
(item
type
:sharpknife,
not-sharp
knife,
or
control)
×2
(time
for
the
first
or
second
answers)
factors
was
calculated,
A
significantinteractien
was
revealed
between
the
item
type
and
the
time
for
the
answer(F(2,
57)=4.53,
P<
,Ol).
In
additionthe
analysisindicated
a significant effectfor
the
time
for
the
answerfor
the
sharp condition(F(1,57)==50.63,
p<.Ol>
and
the
control
condition
(F(1,57)=87.03,
P<.Ol)
but
notfor
the
not-sharpcondition
(F(1,57)==40.06,
n.s).An
analysis withRyan's
test
indicated
adecrease
in
tense
arousalfrom
the
first
time
for
the
answersto
the
secondtime
in
the
sharp condition and control conditiun.It
is
cencludedfrom
the
present
stuclytherefore,
that
the
presence
ofa
knife
did
nothave
a
substafitial
impact
onthe
tense
arousal ofthe
participants.
Another
3
(item
type)
×2
(type
ofinformation,
central or
peripheral)
ANOVA
was calculated onthe
angu]ar-transformedpercent
recognition.The
meanpercentage
of correct recognitionfor
the
central andperipheral
information
in
each
type
of
item
is
listed
in
Figure
1.
A
significantinteraction
between
the
item
Ne.
1
5069
405o
30E・
8
2ots
a
10
o
Central
Peripheral
Figurel,
Recognition
of central and,peripheral
information.
type
and
the
type
of
information
was
noted
(F(2,
57)
=5.39,
P<.Ol).
The
analysis
also
revealeda
significant effect ofthe
item
type
for
centralinforma-tion
(F(2,
114)==5.73,
p<
.O05)
but
notfor
peripheral
information
(F(2,114)=O,27,
n, s),An
analysis withRyan's
test
showedthat
recognitionfor
central infor-mationin
the
sharp
knife
condition
washigher
than
that
in
the
not-sharp condition andthe
controlcendi-tion
(P<O.05,
andP<.OOI)
respectively.
In
otherwords, recognition of aweapon was
better
for
a sharpknife
than
for
a
not-sharpknife
or controlitem.
These
resultsindicate
that
aWFE
occursin
anon-emetional
situation
wherea
knife
is
usually
seen,
andthat
the
sharpness of aknife
demands
a
certain
'
arnount of a
participant;s
attention.Consequently
the
mechanism of aWFE
is
produced
by
the
sharpness of aknife.
However
further
research ofthis
explanation concerningthe
sharpnessis
necessary, with controlledmanipulation
of
the
sharpness
and
other
physical
features,