• 検索結果がありません。

A Generalized Higher Reverse Left (accordingly, Right) Centralizer on Prime Rings

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "A Generalized Higher Reverse Left (accordingly, Right) Centralizer on Prime Rings"

Copied!
7
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

第 54 卷 第 5 期

2019 年 10 月

JOURNAL OF SOUTHWEST JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY

Vol.54 No.5

Oct. 2019

ISSN: 0258-2724 DOI:10.35741/issn.0258-2724.54.5.47

A

G

ENERALIZED

H

IGHER

R

EVERSE

L

EFT

(

ACCORDINGLY

,

R

IGHT

)

C

ENTRALIZER ON

P

RIME

R

INGS

Fawaz Ra’ad Jarullah,a

Salah Mehdi Salih b

a

Department of Mathematics , College of Education , Al-Mustansirya University , Iraq [email protected]

b Department of Mathematics , College of Education , Al-Mustansirya University , Iraq

[email protected]

Abstract

In this study we introduced the concepts of generalized higher reverse left (accordingly, right) centralizer, and Jordan generalized higher reverse left (accordingly, right) centralizer of rings. The definition of Jordan triple generalized higher reverse left (accordingly, right) centralizer was deduced. The most important findings of this paper are as follows: every Jordan generalized higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer of a 2-torsion free prime ring R into itself is a generalized higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer of R. The results have confirmed that every Jordan generalized higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer is a generalized higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer within certain conditions.

Keywords: prime ring, left centralizer, right centralizer, Jordan centralizer

摘要 : 在这项研究中,我们介绍了广义上偏左偏左(相应地,右)定心器的概念,而约旦广义上偏左偏左(相应 地,右)定心器。推导了约旦三元广义广义左上定心(相应地右定心)的定义。 本文最重要的发现如下: 每个约旦将 2 扭转自由质环 R 的左上偏左偏心(相应地右)定心器是 R 的左上偏偏左偏心(相应地右)定 心器。结果已确认,在某些条件下,每个 Jordan 广义左上偏左(相应地右)扶正器都是广义左上偏右(相 应地右)扶正器。 关键词: 填料环,左扶正器,右扶正器,乔丹扶正器

I. I

NTRODUCTION

The concept of generalized higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer is the one of most important topics in non-commutative algebra. The objective of the definition of generalized higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer is to generalize the definition of higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer on rings and to specify the relation between two concepts: generalized higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer and Jordan generalized higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer within certain conditions.

The definition of prime ring and semi-prime ring was introduced in [1]. The definition of

2-torsion free ring was introduced in [2]. While [3] introduced the concept of left (accordingly, right) centralizer and Jordan left (accordingly, right) centralizer of rings, and thus proved that any left (accordingly, right) Jordan centralizer of a 2-torsion free semi-prime ring is a left (accordingly, right) centralizer. On the other hand, [3] was first to introduce the concepts of higher left centralizer, Jordan higher left centralizer and generalization on rings, many results were found by the researchers, one of these results was that every Jordan higher left centralizer of a 2-torsion free prime ring R is a higher left centralizer.

The concept of generalized higher reverse left (accordingly, right) centralizer of -rings was

(2)

first introduced in [4]. One important question can be answered in this paper whether there is a relation between a concept of Jordan generalized higher reverse left(accordingly right) centralizer and a concept of Jordan triple generalized higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer within certain conditions.

II. G

ENERALIZED

H

IGHER

R

EVERSE

L

EFT

(A

CCORDINGLY

,

R

IGHT

)

C

ENTRALIZER ON

P

RIME

R

INGS Definition 2.1

Let T = (Ti)iN be a family of additive

mappings of a ring R into itself. Then T is called a generalized higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer of a ring R into itself associated with the higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer t = (ti) i N of R if for all x, y  R and

n  N: n n i i - 1 i 1 T (x y) T (y) t (x)  

(1) (accordingly, n n i - 1 i i 1 T (x y) t (y) T (x)  

). Definition 2.2

Let T = (Ti) iN be a family of additive

mappings of a ring R into itself. Then T is called a Jordan generalized higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer of a ring R into

itself associated with the Jordan higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer t = (ti) i N of R

if for all x  R and n  N:

n n i i -1 2 1 i T (x ) T (x) t (x)  

(2) (accordingly, n n i - 1 i i 1 2 T (x ) t (x) T (x)  

) Definition 2.3

Let T = (Ti)iN be a family of additive

mappings of a ring R into itself. Then T is called a Jordan triple generalized higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer of a ring R into itself associated with the Jordan triple higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer t = (ti)iN of R if for all x y  R and n  N:

n n i i - 1 i - 1 i 1 T (xyx) T (x) t (y) t (x)  

(3) (accordingly, n n i - 1 i - 1 i i 1 T (xyx) t (x) t (y) T (x)  

) Lemma 2.4

Let T = (Ti)i N be a Jordan generalized higher

reverse left (accordingly , right) centralizer of a ring R into itself .Then for all x, y , z  R and n  N, the following equation holds:

(i) n n n i i - 1 i i - 1 i 1 i 1 T (x y y x) T (y) t (x) T (x) t (y)    

(4) (accordingly, n n n i - 1 i i - 1 i i 1 i 1 T (x y y x) t (y)T (x) t (x)T (y)    

)

 

n n i i - 1 i - 1 n i i - 1 i -1 i 1 i 1 T (x y z z y x) T (z) t (y) t (x) T (x) t (y) t (z)    

ii (5) (accordingly, n n n i - 1 i - 1 i i -1 i - 1 i i 1 i 1 T (x y z z y x) t (z) t (y) T (x) t (x) t (y) T (z))    

)

(iii) In particular, if R is a 2-torsion free commutative ring, then:

n n i i - 1 i - 1 i 1 T (x y z) T (z) t (y) t (x)  

(6) (accordingly, n n i - 1 i - 1 i i 1 T (x y z) t (z) t (y) T (x)  

) Proof:

(i) Since t is a Jordan generalized higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer, we have:

n n i i - 1 i 1 T ((x y) (x y)) T (x y) t (x y)    

  n n n n i i - 1 i i - 1 i i - 1 i i - 1 i 1 i 1 i 1 i 1

T (x) α t (x) T (x) α t (y) T (y) α t (x) T (y) α t (y)...(1)

   

Meanwhile,

n n

(3)

= T (x α x)n T (y α y)n T (x α y+ y α x)n

n n

i i - 1 i i - 1 n

i 1 i 1

T (x) α t (x) T (y) α t (y) T (x α y yα x)

 

  (2)

We obtain the following equation by comparing equations (1) and (2)

n n n i i - 1 i i - 1 i 1 i 1 T (x y y x) T (y) t (x) T (x) t (y)    

(ii) By substituting (x yy x) for y in Lemma (2.4) (i), we obtain:

n i i - 1 i - 1 i i - 1 i - 1 i 1 i i - 1 i - 1 i i - 1 i - 1 T (y) t (x) t (x) T (x) t (y) t (x) T (x) t (y) t (x) T (x) t (x) t (y)...(1)     

In addition, we obtain that

n T (x ( x y yx) ( xy yx ) x) = n i i - 1 i - 1 i 1 T (y) t (x) t (x) 

+ T (x) ti i - 1(x) ti - 1(y) + T (n xyx xyx). ..(2)

We get the following equation by comparing equations (1) and (2)

n n n i i - 1 i - 1 i i - 1 i -1 i 1 i 1 T (x y z z y x) T (z) t (y) t (x) T (x) t (y) t (z)    

(iii) Using (ii) and since R is a commutative ring, we have

n

T (xyzxyz)

T (2 xyz)

n n i i-1 i-1 i 1 2 T (z) t (y) t (x)  

Since R is a 2-torsion free ring, we get

n T (xyz) n i i-1 i-1 i 1 T (z) t (y) t (x)  

Definition 2.5

Let T = (Ti)i N be a Jordan generalized higher

reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer of a ring R into itself .Then for all x, y  R, we

define n: RR R by n( x ,y )= n n i i - 1 i 1 T (x y) T (y) t (x)  

(7) (accordingly, n(x ,y) = i - 1 n n i i 1 T (x y) t (y) T (x)  

) Lemma 2.6

Let T = (Ti)i N be a Jordan generalized higher

reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer of a ring R ring into itself. Then for all x, y, z  R, we have that the following equations hold:

(i) n(x, y) = – n(x ,y)

(ii) n(x + y , z) = n (x, z) + n(y, z)

(iii) n(x, y + z) = n(x ,y)+ n(x, z)

Proof:

(i) By applying Lemma (2.4) (i), we have that

n n n i i - 1 i i - 1 i 1 i 1 T (x y y x) T (y) t (x) T (x) t (y)    

n n n i i - 1 n i i - 1 i 1 i 1 T (x y) T (y) t (x) (T (y x) T (x) t (y))   

  

Thus, n(x ,y) = – n(x, y) (ii) n(x+y,z)= n n i i - 1 i 1 T ((x + y)z ) T (z)t (x + y)  

n n n i i - 1 i i - 1 i 1 i 1 T (x z y z ) T (z) t (x) T (z) t (y)     

n n n i i - 1 n i i - 1 i 1 i 1 T (x z) T (z) t (x) T (y z ) T (z) t (y)    

 

= n (x, z) + n(y, z) (iii) n(x,y+z)= n n i i - 1 i 1 T (x ( y z )) T (y z) t (x)   

 n n n i i-1 i i-1 i 1 i 1 T (x y x z ) T (y) t (x) T (z) t (x)     

n n n i i-1 n i i-1 i 1 i 1 T (x y) T (y) t (x) T (xz) T (z) t (x)    

 

= n(x, y) + n(x, z).

Remark 2.7 It is noteworthy that T = (Ti) i N is

a generalized higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer of a ring R, into itself if and only if n (x, y) = 0, for all x, y  R and n  N.

(4)

Let T = (Ti)iN be a Jordan generalized higher

reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer of a prime ring R into itself. Then for all x, y, z  R and n  N, the following equation holds:

n(x ,y) tn -1(z) [tn - 1( x ), tn - 1(y)]= 0 (8)

Proof:

(i) The Proof is utilizing induction on n  N If n = 1,

Let w = x y z y x + y x z x y

Then, we obtain that

T(w) = T(x( y z y ) x + y (x z x) y) = T (x) y z y x + T(y) x z x y (9) Moreover, we have that

T(w) = T((xy) z (y x) + (yx) z (x y)) = T(yx) z y x + T(xy)z x y (10) The comparison of equations (9) and (10) yields that

0 = (T(yx) – T(x)y) z y x + (T(xy) – T(y)x) z x y 0 = (y, x) z y x +  (x , y) z x y

0 = – (x, y) z y x + (x , y) z x y 0 = (x, y) z (x y – y x)

Thus, (x, y) z [x, y] = 0, for all x, y, z  R. Now, we assume the following:

s (x, y) ts-1( z) [ts - 1 (x), t s - 1 (y)] = 0, for all x, y, z  R , s, n  N and s < n. (11)

Tn(w) = Tn (x( y z y ) x + y (x z x) y) = n i 1

Ti (x) ti - 1 (y z y) ti -1( x ) + n i 1

Ti(y)ti - 1 (x z x) ti - 1( y ) (12) = n i 1

Ti (x) ti - 1(y) ti - 1(z) ti - 1 (y) ti - 1(x) + n i 1

Ti (y) ti - 1(x) ti - 1(z) ti - 1 (x) ti - 1(y) (13) = n i 1 ( 

Ti(x) ti – 1(y) ) tn - 1(z) tn - 1(y) tn - 1(x) + n 1 i 1  

Ti(x)ti - 1 (y) ti - 1(z) ti - 1(y) ti - 1(x) + n i 1 ( 

Ti(y) ti - 1 (x) ) tn - 1(z) tn - 1(x) tn - 1( y) + n 1 i 1  

Ti(y) ti - 1(x) ti - 1 (z) ti – 1(x) ti - 1(y) (14)

Tn(w) = Tn ((xy) z (y x) + (yx) z (xy)) = n i 1

Ti (yx) ti - 1 (z) ti - 1 (x y) + n i 1

Ti (xy) ti - 1 (z) ti - 1 (y x) = Tn (yx) tn - 1 (z) tn - 1(y) tn - 1(x) + n 1 i 1  

Tn (yx) ti - 1 (z) ti – 1(y) ti - 1 (x) + Tn (xy) tn - 1 (z) tn - 1 (x) tn - 1 (y) + n 1

i 1

 

Tn(xy) ti - 1 (z) ti - 1 (x) ti - 1 (y) (15 )

By comparing equations (14) and (15), we have that 0 = (Tn (yx)

n i 1

Ti(x) ti - 1 (y)) tn - 1(z) tn - 1 (y) tn - 1(x) + (Tn (xy) n i 1

Ti(y) ti - 1 (x)) tn - 1(z) tn - 1 (x) tn - 1 (y) + n 1 i 1  

(Ti (yx) Ti (x) ti - 1 (y)) ti - 1(z) ti - 1 (y) ti - 1 (x) + n 1 i 1  

(Ti (xy) Ti(y) t i - 1 (x)) t i - 1(z) t i - 1 (x) t i - 1 (y) (16) It follows that

(5)

0 = n(y, x) t n - 1 (z) t n-1 (y) t n - 1 (x) + n(x ,y) t n -1 (z) t n - 1 (x) t n - 1 (y)

0 = n(x, y) t n - 1 (z) t n - 1 (y)t n - 1 (x) + n(x, y) t n - 1 (z) t n - 1 (x) t n - 1 (y)

0 = n(x, y) t n - 1 (z)(t n - 1(x) t n - 1 (y) t n - 1 (y) t n – 1 (x))

Thus, n (x, y) t n - 1 (z) [t n - 1 (x), t n - 1 (y)] = 0, for all x, y, z  R and n  N

Lemma 2.9

Let T = (Ti)i N be a Jordan generalized higher

reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer of a

prime ring R into itself. Then for all x, y, z, u, v  R and n  N:

n(x ,y) tn -1(z)[tn - 1 (u), tn - 1 (v)] = 0 (17)

Proof:

(i) By substituting (x + u) for x in Lemma 2.8, we have that n(x + u ,y) tn -1(z) [ tn - 1(x + u) , tn - 1(y) ] = 0.

Thus

n(x, y) tn -1(z)[tn - 1(x), tn - 1(y)] + n(x ,y) tn -1(z) [tn - 1(u) , tn - 1(y)]

n(u, y) tn -1(z) [tn - 1(x), tn - 1(y)]+ n(u, y) tn -1(z) [tn - 1(u), tn - 1(y)] = 0.

By applying Lemma 2.8, we obtain that

n(x, y) tn -1(z) [tn - 1(u), tn - 1(y)] + n(u, y) tn -1(z) [tn - 1(x), tn - 1(y)] = 0

Therefore, we get that

n(x, y) tn -1(z) [tn - 1(u), tn - 1(y)] tn -1(z) n(x, y) tn -1(z) [tn - 1(u) ,tn - 1(y)] = 0.

This implies that

0 = n(x, y) tn -1(z) [tn - 1(u), tn - 1(y)] tn -1(z) n(u, y) tn -1(z) [tn - 1(x), tn - 1(y)] .

Since R is a prime ring, we have that

n(x, y) tn -1(z) [tn - 1(u), tn - 1(y)] = 0 (18)

The substitution of (y + v) for y in Lemma 2.8, gives that n(x, y + v) tn -1(z) [tn - 1(x), tn - 1(y + v)] = 0

n(x, y) tn -1(z) [tn - 1(x) , tn - 1(y)] + n(x, y) tn -1(z) [tn - 1(x) , tn - 1(v)] + n(x, v) tn -1(z) [tn - 1(x), tn - 1(y)] +

n(x ,v) tn -1(z) [tn - 1(x), tn - 1(v)] = 0.

By utilizing Lemma 2.8, we obtain that

n(x ,y) tn -1(z) [ tn - 1(x) ,tn - 1(v) ] + n(x ,y) tn -1(z) [tn - 1(x),tn - 1(y)] = 0

Consequently, we have

n(x, y) tn -1(z)[tn - 1(x) ,tn - 1(v)] tn -1(z)n(x, y) tn -1(z) [tn - 1(x) ,tn - 1(v)] = 0

This implies that

0 = n(x, y) tn -1(z) [tn - 1(x), tn - 1(v)] tn -1(z) n(x ,v) tn -1(z) [tn - 1(x), tn - 1(y)].

The fact that R is a prime number yields that

n(x,y) tn -1(z)[tn - 1(x) ,tn - 1(v)] = 0 (19)

Now, n(x ,y) tn -1(z) [ tn - 1(x + u) ,tn - 1( y+v) ] = 0

n(x, y) tn -1(z) [ tn - 1(x) ,tn - 1(y) ] + n(x ,y) tn -1(z) [ tn - 1(x) ,tn - 1(v) ] + n(x ,y) tn -1(z) [ tn - 1(u), tn - 1(y)]+

n(x, y) tn -1(z)[tn - 1(u), tn - 1(v)] = 0.

(6)

第 54 卷 第 5 期

2019 年 10 月

JOURNAL OF SOUTHWEST JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY

Vol.54 No.5

Oct. 2019

By employing equations (18), (19) and Lemma 2.8, we get

n(x, y) tn -1(z) [tn - 1(u), tn - 1(v)] = 0.

Theorem 2.10

Every Jordan generalized higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer of a 2-torsion free prime ring R into itself is a generalized higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer of R. Proof:

Let T = (Ti)i N be a Jordan generalized higher

reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer of a prime ring R into itself. Since R is a prime ring, then by employing Lemma 2.9, we have that either n(x, y) = 0 or [tn - 1(u), tn - 1(v)] = 0, for all

x, y, u, v  R and n  N.

If [tn – 1(u), tn - 1(v)]  0, for all u, v  R, then

n(x, y) = 0, for all x, y  R and n  N. Hence,

using Remark 2.7, we obtain that T is a higher

generalized reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer of R.

If [tn - 1(u), tn - 1(v)] = 0, for all u, v  R and n  N.

Then R is a commutative ring. By utilizing Lemma 2.4(i), we have that

n n i i - 1 i 1 T (x y x y ) 2 T (y) t (x)   

(20) Since R is a 2-torsion free ring, we get that

n n i i-1 i 1 T (x y) T (y) t (x)  

(21) Then T is a higher generalized reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer of R.

Proposition 2.11

Let T = (Ti)i N be a Jordan generalized higher

reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer of a 2-torsion free ring R into itself. Then T is a

Jordan triple generalized higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer of R.

Proof:

The substitution of y for (x y + y x) in Lemma 2.4 (i) results in

 

n x y + yx x y + T (x  yx x)

 

n i i - 1 i - 1 i i - 1 i - 1 i 1 i i - 1 i - 1 i i - 1 i - 1 T (y) t (x) t (x) T (x) t (y) t (x) T (x) t (y) t (x) T (x) t (x) t (y) 23     

Moreover, we get that

n T (x( xyyx) ( xyy )x)x = n 2 2 T (x yxy x x y xy x ) = n i i - 1 i - 1 i 1 T (y) t (x) t (x) 

+ T (x) ti i - 1(x) ti - 1(y) + T ( y x x y xn x  )(24)

By comparing equations (23) and (24)

n T ( y x x x y x) = n x 2 T ( y x) = n i i - 1 i - 1 i 1 2 T (x) t (y) t (x) 

(25)

Since R is a 2-torsion free ring, we obtain that T is a Jordan triple generalized higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer of R.

III. C

ONCLUSION

In this paper we defined the concepts of generalized higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer, Jordan generalized higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer and Jordan triple generalized higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer on rings. This paper discussed the relation between the concept of Jordan generalized higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer and Jordan generalized higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer within certain conditions. Also, this paper was able to answer the question that referred to the introduction.

According to the previous results, the future study in this paper will indicate the domain of additive mapping that deals with a M-Module while the Codomain deals with a -ring. So that we can give the definition of the concept of generalized higher reverse left (accordingly right) centralizer and we can find many results with fewer conditions. Through a future study we will be able to discover a relation between a commutative algebra represented by a  M-Module and a non-commutative algebra represented by -ring.

R

EFERENCES

[1] Al-HACHMI, A. (2017) Orthogonal Left

Derivation of Semi-Prime Rings. Journal

(7)

Applications,

11(2),

pp.

1-4,

doi:

10.4172/1736-4337.1000270.

[2] REDDY, S.C.J. and REDDY, B.R.

(2016)

Orthogonal

Symmetric

Bi

Derivations

in

Semiprime

Rings.

International Journal of Algebra, 10(9),

pp. 423-428, doi: 10.12988/ija.2016.6751

[3] SALIH, S.M. (2016) Generalized Higher

Left

Centralizer

of

Prime

Rings.

International

Journal

of

Current

Research, 8(11), pp. 40966 – 40975.

[4] JARULLAH, F.R. and SALIH, S.M.

(2019) A Generalized Higher Reverse

Left (respectively Right) Centralizer of

Prime

-Rings. Mathematical Theory and

Modeling,

9(10),

pp.

60-72,

doi: 10.7176/MTM/9-10-06.

Available

from

https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/

MTM/article/view/50158/51808

参考文:

[1] Al-HACHMI,A.(2017)半素环的正

交左导数。 广义李理论与应用学报,11(

2 ) , 第 1-4 页 , doi : 10.4172 /

1736-4337.1000270。

[2] REDDY,S.C.J。 和 REDDY,B.R. (

2016)半素环中的正交对称双导数。 国际

代数杂志,10(9),第 423-428 页,doi

:10.12988 / ija.2016.6751

[3] SALIH,S.M. (2016)广义上环的左

上角扶正器。 国际当前研究杂志,8(11

),第 40966 – 40975 页。

[4] JARULLAH,F.R. 和 SALIH,S.M. (

2019)Prime R-Rings 的广义左上偏心集中

器。 数学理论与建模,9(10),第

60-72 页,doi:10.7176 / MTM / 9-10-06。 可

https://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/MT

M/article/view/50158/51808 获得

参照

関連したドキュメント

In this paper, we study the generalized Keldys- Fichera boundary value problem which is a kind of new boundary conditions for a class of higher-order equations with

The proofs of these three theorems rely on the auxiliary structure of left and right constraints which we develop in the next section, and which also displays the relation with

In this work we give definitions of the notions of superior limit and inferior limit of a real distribution of n variables at a point of its domain and study some properties of

˙Ibrahim C¸anak: Department of Mathematics, Adnan Menderes University, 09010 Aydın, Turkey Email address: [email protected]. Umit Totur: Department of Mathematics, Adnan

Theorem 1. Tarnanen uses the conjugacy scheme of the group S n in order to obtain new upper bounds for the size of a permutation code. A distance that is both left- and right-

Although such deter- mining equations are known (see for example [23]), boundary conditions involving all polynomial coefficients of the linear operator do not seem to have been

Here, the Zermello’s conditions are given in Lagrange-Hamilton spaces, introduced in [9] and presented at the Workshop on Finsler Geometry 2009, Debrecen.. It is proved that for

The result (Theorem 7.6) is a bisimplicial object in model categories (so every structure map is a strong left and right Quillen functor) such that applying an ‘evaluation functor’