[PDF] Top 20 Lec2 1 最近の更新履歴 yyasuda's website

... prize s, where P s∈S p(s) = 1 (here p(s) is the objective probability of obtaining the prize s given the lottery ...with 1 − ... 完全なドキュメントを参照

... Explain. (b) Show that any risk averse decision maker whose preference satisfies indepen- dence axiom must prefer L 2 to L 3 . 3. Question 3 (4 points) Suppose a monopolist with constant marginal costs prac- tices ... 完全なドキュメントを参照

... The main theorem shows that the condition that a schools’ priority profile ≻ C has a common priority order for every type t ∈ T is sufficient for the existence of feasible assignments which are both fair and ... 完全なドキュメントを参照

... player 2 chooses X and q be a probability that player 1 chooses ...player 1 must be indi¤erent amongst choosing A and B, we obtain 2p = p + 3(1 p) , 4p = 3 , p = ... 完全なドキュメントを参照

... あい 1 位 位 位 位 ともき ともき ともき ともき ともき ともき ともき ともき だいき だいき だいき だいき 2 位 位 位 位 こうき こうき こうき こうき こうき こうき こうき こうき ともき ともき ともき ともき 3 位 位 位 位 だいき だいき だいき だいき だいき だいき だいき だいき こうき こうき こうき ... 完全なドキュメントを参照

... Prisoners’ Dilemma: Analysis (3)
 (Silent, Silent) looks mutually beneficial outcomes, though  Playing Confess is optimal regardless of other player’s choice!  Acting optimally ( Confess , Confess ) rends up ... 完全なドキュメントを参照

... all s i ∈ S i , which is identical to Nash equilibrium ...equilibrium s ∗∗ 6= s ∗ . Pick player j with s ∗∗ j 6= s ∗ j ...Since s ∗∗ j is a Nash equilibrium ... 完全なドキュメントを参照

... (b) Does this production function display increasing, constant, or decreasing re- turns to scale? Explain why. (c) Formulate the cost minimization problem (you may denote a target output level by y). Then, solve it and ... 完全なドキュメントを参照

... St Petersburg Paradox (1) The most primitive way to evaluate a lottery is to calculate its mathematical expectation, i.e., E[p] = P s∈S p(s)s. Daniel Bernoulli first doubt this approach in ... 完全なドキュメントを参照

... with x = (y, z) where y is a scalar, z is an n-dimensional consumption vector, and V (·) is a real valued function. The consumption set X = R n +1 + . (a) Show that if V is concave, U is quasi-concave. (b) Show ... 完全なドキュメントを参照

... Solve the following problems in Snyder and Nicholson (11th):. 1.[r] ... 完全なドキュメントを参照

... Solve the following problems in Snyder and Nicholson (11th):. 1.[r] ... 完全なドキュメントを参照

... with x = (y, z) where y is a scalar, z is an n-dimensional consumption vector, and V (·) is a real valued function. The consumption set X = R n+1 + . (a) Show that if V is concave, U is quasi-concave. (b) Show ... 完全なドキュメントを参照

... Solve the following problems in Snyder and Nicholson (11th):. 1.[r] ... 完全なドキュメントを参照

... with x = (y, z) where y is a scalar, z is an n-dimensional consumption vector, and V (·) is a real valued function. The consumption set X = R n+1 + . (a) Show that if V is concave, U is quasi-concave. (b) Show ... 完全なドキュメントを参照

... Combination of dominant strategies is Nash equilibrium. There are many games where no dominant strategy exists[r] ... 完全なドキュメントを参照

... A good is called normal (resp. inferior) if consumption of it increases (resp. declines) as income increases, holding prices constant.. Show the following claims.[r] ... 完全なドキュメントを参照

... Let w = (w 1 , w 2 , w 3 , w 4 ) ≫ 0 be factor prices and y be an (target) output. (a) Does the production function exhibit increasing, constant or decreasing returns to scale? Explain. (b) Calculate the ... 完全なドキュメントを参照

... Using this minimax theorem, answer the following questions. (b) Show that Nash equilibria are interchangeable; if and are two Nash equilibria, then and are also Nash equilibria. (c) Show that each player’s payo¤ ... 完全なドキュメントを参照

... u 2 (x, y 2 ) = 2 ln x + y 2 ...persons 1 and 2 when he buys x, and thinks only of his own utility maximization ...persons 1 and 2 buy? (b) Use the Samuelson ... 完全なドキュメントを参照