• 検索結果がありません。

21COE-GLOPE Working Paper Series

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "21COE-GLOPE Working Paper Series"

Copied!
13
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

21COE-GLOPE Working Paper Series

If you have any comment or question on the working paper series, please contact each author.

When making a copy or reproduction of the content, please contact us in advance to request permission. The source should explicitly be credited.

GLOPE Web Site: http://www.waseda.jp/prj-GLOPE/en/index.html

Relationship among Solutions of Cooperative Game under Incomplete Information

Taisuke Matsubae

Working Paper No. 19

(2)

! "#$%$ &'

«¬ «¬

!"#$%&

!"#$%&

' (

)

( !"#*+& )

, '

) ) !"##$& -

.

) /!"###& 0

!"

(3)

1

. )

4 '.

( 5

6 !"##"&

( 6

!233$& 7 )

1 Æ

)

(

1

0

,

8 5 %

9 7: " 7:2

; 9

!

&

!"&

)-

!2&

'

!8&

7

)-'.

!%& <

0

7:

7:

;

=

'

7

7:

7

)

7:

9

!

&

, > !233$&

(4)

!> !233$&&

!

& ,

?

!

&

@ ?

!

&

@

?

!&

@ .

!

&

! ! &

!

&

&

A

!

&

!

&

)

7:

(

,

B

!

& ,

?

!

B

&

@ ?

!

B

&

@

?

!&

@ .

!

&

! ! &

!

&

&

C B

!B

&7:

(

7:

:

2"A,

1

D

!

&

(5)

:

!

&

(

' .

.

?

!

&@ :

!

&?

!

&

@

:

!&

! ! &

!

&

&

) !"#$3& > !233$&

=

6

!"##"& > !233$&

'

'

!> !233$&&

?

!

&@?

!

&@

E 2%

B

A

!

&

!

&

)

=

> !233$& D

'

!B

& B

?

!

B

&@?

!

&@

)E 2F

.

(6)

' .

( = !&

G

( '

!&

A

H

!

&

?

!

&@?

!

&@

E 2$ . E 2%

A

)

H

!B

& B

?

!

B

&@?

!

&@

) E 2*

)

D

< !&

H!

H

&

1 A ,

,

'

!

&

?

!

&@?

!

&@

) )!"##$&

A

( =

=

=

=

)

(7)

) 2

)

=

=

= =

A

I

=

=

=

=

H

H

=

=

D

A (

=

0

7:

)

=

:

=

( B

B =

( B

A

B

7

!B

&7 7

?

!

B

&@?

!B&@

B

B

B

. B

(

B=

J;E

(8)

=

,

,

'

= 82 88

:

:

=

=

A =

: =

)

A !"##+&

(

(

!

&7:

?

!

&@ ?

!

&@5

!

& '!&

.

=

:=

7 7

!

&:

=

:=

( ,

=

=

8"

D

=

=

9 B =

7

7

7 7

?

!

&@?

!B&@

( K

!

&:

!

&

?

!&@B ?

!

&@

?

!

K

&@

K

' .

(B=

J;E

(9)

.

=

, =

! &

A =

: =

)

!

&

D

7 7

!

&

:

=

:=

!

&

8F

J;E

(

(

0 =

:=

7 7

!

&

:

=

:=

(

=

=

D

=

=

9 Ü =

=

7

7

7 7

?

!

&@?

!B&@

K

!

&

(10)

!

&

1

!

&

?

!&@B ?

!

&@

?

!

K

&@

C

K

.

B

B =

J;E

7 7

!

&

:

=

:=

8* J;E

7 7

!

&

:

=

:=

:=

:=

!

&

:

. '

'

=

=

(

=

=

7 7: "28

7

7:

7

:

:"2

:8

(11)

2"2 833

833 "2"

"2" 33%

23" 8"2

87 G

8

"2" 333

33" "3"

%7 G

8

""" 333

833 8"3

F7 G

8

"%2 838

333 2"3

$7 G

8

""3 233

"3" 8"3

*7 G

8

"8" "32

338 82"

+7 G

8

"83 83"

"33 ""2

0 ' . (

" 2 8

!

&:"+ !

&:8+

!

&:8+ !

&:"+

=

:

:!! &!

&

&

:!! &!

&

&

:!! &!

&

&

=

:

:!! &!

&

&

:!! &!

&

&

D

=

=

I =

=

7 7

!

&:

=

=

( =

=

9 B =

=

7

7 3

!

&7 7

(12)

? ! &@? ! &@B

D K

!

&

?

!&@B ?

!

&@

?

!

K

&@

K &

.

( B=

J;E

8"3 '

. H

A

!

&

> !233$&

) =

=

))!"##*&

)

=

=

= =

=

=

(

) =

=

( 0

, )

-L !"#$%&M/A1

N ! "*8O"*#

00!233%&M N

! ! "8FO"F"

;1!2333&M N" #

"*#O"++

) !"##*&

(13)

$ %FFO%*8

A 1 !"##+& M= N% # ! !"&"O+

/ - !"###& M) N "

# "28O"%*

( - !"#*+& M) Æ N #

+3*O+"$

6A=!"##"&M . N#

"+8O"#+

6> 1 6 I !233$& M;

α

N

&'(#! ) ! # &) # *+ *,

参照

関連したドキュメント

Our interest does not simply lie on a resolution to Roberts’ impossibility because, in the case of quasi-transitive social preferences, the Pareto extension rule, which

In order to analyze the stability of market structures, we adopt the core, the well-established solution concept in cooperative game theory and examine which of all

Similar to most of the existing works on mixed oligopoly, a public firm owned by the central government, that is, a state-owned public firm is assumed to maximize the

Communication in such situations can be represented by two-level: the first level is only between players in the same element of a coalition structure and the second level

In their model of mixed triopoly of entrepreneurial firms, Kamaga and Nakamura (2007) show that the market structures of the regime (c) with β ∈ [0.56950, 0.56996] belong to

In this subsection, using Lemma 3, we analyze the effect of the change in a domestic country i’s marginal cost and foreign countries’ marginal costs on the optimal domestic

Overview and Discussion,” paper presented at 2007 City U-Waseda Joint Confer- ence: Research in Global Economic and Financial Issues: Theory,Empirical and Experimental

First, we consider Country B. The national welfare of the country is the corporate tax revenue, and thus it maximizes the tax revenue. We explain the intuition behind Proposition