• 検索結果がありません。

ロスビー波によるエネルギーフラックスのシームレス全球解析に向けて

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "ロスビー波によるエネルギーフラックスのシームレス全球解析に向けて"

Copied!
25
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

…" " Rossby " (Hidenori"Aiki) JAMSTEC8APL" A"" / / "(H278H31:"15H02129)" A A0509 2015 6 9 ( ) 6 10 " " " 20 " •  " •  " " " •  β β β " •  " Chang"and"Orlanski"(1994)" •  " •  β β β " " •  Impulse8bolus " " "

(2)

! Aiki,!H.,!K.!Takaya!and!R.!J.!Greatbatch,!2015:! ! A!divergence>form!wave>induced!pressure!inherent!in!the!extension!of! the!Eliassen>Palm!theory!to!a!three>dimensional!framework! for!all!waves!at!all!laJtudes,! ! Journal!of!the!Atmospheric!Sciences,!72,!2822>2849! " " hPp://dx.doi.org/10.1175/JAS8D81480172.1 hPp://www.jamstec.go.jp/res/ress/aiki/"

(3)

•  •  •  •  •  • 

(4)

A draft manuscript in preparation for J. Fluid Mech. Rapid 1

Toward a seamless global diagnosis for the

horizontal flux of Rossby wave energy

H I D E N O R I A I K I

1

A N D

K O U T A R O U T A K A Y A

2

1Application Laboratory, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama

236-0001, Japan

2Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kyoto, Japan

(Received ?; draft version on January 15, 2015)

A† = A − A ∇yz = ⟨⟨∂y, ∂z⟩⟩ Q† = ψxx + ψyy + (ψzf02/N2)z (∂t + u∂x)[ψxx + ψyy + (ψzf02/N2)z ! "# $ Q† ] + ψx(β − uyy) = 0 Q†ψx = −∇yz · ⟨⟨−ψxψy ! "# $ vgug ,−ψzψxf02/N2 ! "# $ −f0vgρ†/ρz ⟩⟩ ∂t[(1/2)Q†2/(uyy − β) ! "# $ E/Cx p ] + ∇yz · ⟨⟨ −ψxψy ! "# $ Cgy(E/Cpx) ,−ψzψxf02/N2 ! "# $ Cz g(E/Cpx) ⟩⟩ = 0 ∂tu − f0v∗ = −∇yz · ⟨⟨−ψxψy ! "# $ vgug ,−ψzψxf02/N2 ! "# $ −f0vgρ†/ρz ⟩⟩ ∂t[u + (1/2)Q†2/(β − uyy) ! "# $ −E/Cx p ] − f0v∗ = 0 (0.1) A′ = A − A (0.2) ∇ = ⟨⟨∂x, ∂y, ∂z⟩⟩ (0.3)

⟨⟨u′, v′, w′⟩⟩ = ⟨⟨ug, vg, 0⟩⟩ + ⟨⟨ua, va, wa⟩⟩ (0.4)

ug = −ψy, vg = ψx, ψ = p′/f0, (0.5) ζ′ = −ρ′/ρz = (g/ρ0)ρ′/N2 = −ψzf0/N2 (0.6) Q = ψxx + ψyy + (ψzf02/N2)z (0.7) ∂t[ψxx + ψyy + (ψzf02/N2)z ! "# $ Q ] + βψx = 0 (0.8) ψx = −Qt/β (0.9)

† Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

A draft manuscript in preparation for J. Fluid Mech. Rapid 1

Toward a seamless global diagnosis for the

horizontal flux of Rossby wave energy

H I D E N O R I A I K I

1

A N D

K O U T A R O U T A K A Y A

2

1Application Laboratory, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama

236-0001, Japan

2Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kyoto, Japan

(Received ?; draft version on January 15, 2015)

A† = A − A ∇yz = ⟨⟨∂y, ∂z⟩⟩ Q† = ψxx + ψyy + (ψzf02/N2)z (∂t + u∂x)[ψxx + ψyy + (ψzf02/N2)z ! "# $ Q† ] + ψx(β − uyy) = 0 Q†ψx = −∇yz · ⟨⟨−ψxψy ! "# $ vgug ,−ψzψxf02/N2 ! "# $ −f0vgρ†/ρz ⟩⟩ ∂t[(1/2)Q†2/(uyy − β) ! "# $ E/Cx p ] + ∇yz · ⟨⟨ −ψxψy ! "# $ Cgy(E/Cpx) ,−ψzψxf02/N2 ! "# $ Cz g(E/Cpx) ⟩⟩ = 0 ∂tu − f0v∗ = −∇yz · ⟨⟨−ψxψy ! "# $ vgug ,−ψzψxf02/N2 ! "# $ −f0vgρ†/ρz ⟩⟩ ∂t[u + (1/2)Q†2/(β − uyy) ! "# $ −E/Cx p ] − f0v∗ = 0 (0.1) A′ = A − A (0.2) ∇ = ⟨⟨∂x, ∂y, ∂z⟩⟩ (0.3)

⟨⟨u′, v′, w′⟩⟩ = ⟨⟨ug, vg, 0⟩⟩ + ⟨⟨ua, va, wa⟩⟩ (0.4)

ug = −ψy, vg = ψx, ψ = p′/f0, (0.5) ζ′ = −ρ′/ρz = (g/ρ0)ρ′/N2 = −ψzf0/N2 (0.6) Q = ψxx + ψyy + (ψzf02/N2)z (0.7) ∂txx + ψyy + (ψzf02/N2)z ! "# $ Q ] + βψx = 0 (0.8) ψx = −Qt/β (0.9)

† Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

A draft manuscript in preparation for J. Fluid Mech. Rapid 1

Toward a seamless global diagnosis for the

horizontal flux of Rossby wave energy

H I D E N O R I A I K I

1

A N D

K O U T A R O U T A K A Y A

2

1Application Laboratory, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama

236-0001, Japan

2Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kyoto, Japan

(Received ?; draft version on January 15, 2015)

A† = A − A ∇yz = ⟨⟨∂y, ∂z⟩⟩ Q† = ψxx + ψyy + (ψzf02/N2)z (∂t + u∂x)[ψxx + ψyy + (ψzf02/N2)z ! "# $ Q† ] + ψx(β − uyy) = 0 Q†ψx = −∇yz · ⟨⟨−ψxψy ! "# $ vgug ,−ψzψxf02/N2 ! "# $ −f0vgρ†/ρz ⟩⟩ ∂t[(1/2)Q†2/(uyy − β) ! "# $ E/Cx p ] + ∇yz · ⟨⟨ −ψxψy ! "# $ Cgy(E/Cpx) ,−ψzψxf02/N2 ! "# $ Cz g(E/Cpx) ⟩⟩ = 0 ∂tu − f0v∗ = −∇yz · ⟨⟨−ψxψy ! "# $ vgug ,−ψzψxf02/N2 ! "# $ −f0vgρ†/ρz ⟩⟩ ∂t[u + (1/2)Q†2/(β − uyy) ! "# $ −E/Cx p ] − f0v∗ = 0 (0.1) A′ = A − A (0.2) ∇ = ⟨⟨∂x, ∂y, ∂z⟩⟩ (0.3)

⟨⟨u′, v′, w′⟩⟩ = ⟨⟨ug, vg, 0⟩⟩ + ⟨⟨ua, va, wa⟩⟩ (0.4)

ug = −ψy, vg = ψx, ψ = p′/f0, (0.5) ζ′ = −ρ′/ρz = (g/ρ0)ρ′/N2 = −ψzf0/N2 (0.6) Q = ψxx + ψyy + (ψzf02/N2)z (0.7) ∂t[ψxx + ψyy + (ψzf02/N2)z ! "# $ Q ] + βψx = 0 (0.8) ψx = −Qt/β (0.9)

† Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

A draft manuscript in preparation for J. Fluid Mech. Rapid 1

Toward a seamless global diagnosis for the

horizontal flux of Rossby wave energy

H I D E N O R I A I K I

1

A N D

K O U T A R O U T A K A Y A

2

1Application Laboratory, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama

236-0001, Japan

2Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kyoto, Japan

(Received ?; draft version on January 15, 2015)

A† = A − A ∇yz = ⟨⟨∂y, ∂z⟩⟩ Q† = ψxx + ψyy + (ψzf02/N2)z (∂t + u∂x)[ψxx + ψyy + (ψzf02/N2)z ! "# $ Q† ] + ψx(β − uyy) = 0 Q†ψx = −∇yz · ⟨⟨−ψxψy ! "# $ vgug ,−ψzψxf02/N2 ! "# $ −f0vgρ†/ρz ⟩⟩ ∂t[(1/2)Q†2/(uyy − β) ! "# $ E/Cx p ] + ∇yz · ⟨⟨ −ψxψy ! "# $ Cgy(E/Cpx) ,−ψzψxf02/N2 ! "# $ Cz g(E/Cpx) ⟩⟩ = 0 ∂tu − f0v∗ = −∇yz · ⟨⟨−ψxψy ! "# $ vgug ,−ψzψxf02/N2 ! "# $ −f0vgρ†/ρz ⟩⟩ ∂t[u + (1/2)Q†2/(β − uyy) ! "# $ −E/Cx p ] − f0v∗ = 0 (0.1) A′ = A − A (0.2) ∇ = ⟨⟨∂x, ∂y, ∂z⟩⟩ (0.3)

⟨⟨u′, v′, w′⟩⟩ = ⟨⟨ug, vg, 0⟩⟩ + ⟨⟨ua, va, wa⟩⟩ (0.4)

ug = −ψy, vg = ψx, ψ = p′/f0, (0.5) ζ′ = −ρ′/ρz = (g/ρ0)ρ′/N2 = −ψzf0/N2 (0.6) Q = ψxx + ψyy + (ψzf02/N2)z (0.7) ∂txx + ψyy + (ψzf02/N2)z ! "# $ Q ] + βψx = 0 (0.8) ψx = −Qt/β (0.9)

(5)

Toward a seamless global diagnosis for the horizontal flux of Rossby wave energy 3 u′t − (f0 + βy)v′ = −p′x, vt′ + (f0 + βy)u′ = −p′y, ρ′t + w′ρz = 0, u′x + vy′ + wz′ = 0, ⟨⟨u′, v′, w′⟩⟩ = ⟨⟨ξt′, ηt′, ζt⟩⟩, (0.21) ζ′ ≡ −ρ′/ρz = −p′z/N2, K = (u′2 + v′2)/2, G = (N2/2)ζ′2, q′ ≡ vx− uy − (f0 + βy)ζz′, qt′ + βv′ = 0, η′ = −q′/β, (K + G ! "# $ E )t + ∇ · ⟨⟨up, vp, wp⟩⟩ = 0, c p ≡ ω/k, cg ≡ ∂ω/∂k (E/cp)t + ∇ · ⟨⟨up/c p, v′p′/cp, w′p′/cp⟩⟩ = 0, % + −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % + −∞ cg(E/cp) dy, % + −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % +−∞∞ cg(E/cp) dy = % +−∞∞ cg(ζz′u′ + q′η′/2) dy = % +−∞∞ (u′u− K + G) dy π′ % tp′dt, u′ − fη′ = −πx′ , v′ + fξ′ = −πy′ , E ≡ K + G = (u′2 + v′2 + N2ζ′2)/2 = (u′ξ′ t + v′ηt′ − ζπzt′ )/2, (−u′ξ′ x − v′ηx′ + ζ′πzx′ )/2 = ζz′u′ + q′η′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨−v′η′, u′η′, ζ′πx′ ⟩⟩/2 (−u′ξ′ y − v′ηy′ + ζ′πzy′ )/2 = ζz′v′ − q′ξ′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨v′ξ′, −u′ξ′, ζ′πy′ ⟩⟩/2 (0.22) ∂t(ζz′u′) + q′v′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′u′ − K + G, v′u′, ζ′p′x⟩⟩, ∂t(ζz′v′) − q′u′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′v′, v′v′ − K + G, ζ′p′y⟩⟩,

Toward a seamless global diagnosis for the horizontal flux of Rossby wave energy 3

u′t − (f0 + βy)v′ = −p′x, vt′ + (f0 + βy)u′ = −p′y, ρ′t + w′ρz = 0, u′x + vy′ + w′z = 0, ⟨⟨u′, v′, w′⟩⟩ = ⟨⟨ξt′, ηt′, ζt⟩⟩, (0.21) ζ′ ≡ −ρ′/ρz = −p′z/N2, K = (u′2 + v′2)/2, G = (N2/2)ζ′2, q′ ≡ vx− uy − (f0 + βy)ζz′, qt′ + βv′ = 0, η′ = −q′/β, (K + G ! "# $ E )t + ∇ · ⟨⟨u′p′, v′p′, w′p′⟩⟩ = 0, cp ≡ ω/k, cg ≡ ∂ω/∂k (E/cp)t + ∇ · ⟨⟨u′p′/cp, v′p′/cp, w′p′/cp⟩⟩ = 0, % + −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % + −∞ cg(E/cp) dy, % + −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % +−∞∞ cg(E/cp) dy = % +−∞∞ cg(ζz′u′ + q′η′/2) dy = % +−∞∞ (u′u− K + G) dy π′ % tp′dt, u′ − fη′ = −πx′ , v′ + fξ′ = −πy′ , E ≡ K + G = (u′2 + v′2 + N2ζ′2)/2 = (u′ξ′ t + v′ηt′ − ζπzt′ )/2, (−u′ξ′ x − v′ηx′ + ζ′πzx′ )/2 = ζz′u′ + q′η′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨−v′η′, u′η′, ζ′πx′ ⟩⟩/2 (−u′ξ′ y − v′ηy′ + ζ′πzy′ )/2 = ζz′v′ − q′ξ′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨v′ξ′,−u′ξ′, ζ′πy′ ⟩⟩/2 (0.22) ∂t(ζz′u′) + q′v′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′u′ − K + G, v′u′, ζ′p′x⟩⟩, ∂t(ζz′v′) − q′u′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′v′, v′v′ − K + G, ζ′p′y⟩⟩,

Toward a seamless global diagnosis for the horizontal flux of Rossby wave energy 3

u′t − (f0 + βy)v′ = −p′x, vt′ + (f0 + βy)u′ = −p′y, ρ′t + w′ρz = 0, u′x + vy′ + wz′ = 0, ⟨⟨u′, v′, w′⟩⟩ = ⟨⟨ξt′, ηt′, ζt⟩⟩, (0.21) ζ′ ≡ −ρ′/ρz = −p′z/N2, K = (u′2 + v′2)/2, G = (N2/2)ζ′2, q′ ≡ vx− uy − (f0 + βy)ζz′, qt′ + βv′ = 0, η′ = −q′/β, (K + G ! "# $ E )t + ∇ · ⟨⟨up, vp, wp⟩⟩ = 0, c p ≡ ω/k, cg ≡ ∂ω/∂k (E/cp)t + ∇ · ⟨⟨u′p′/cp, v′p′/cp, w′p′/cp⟩⟩ = 0, % + −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % +

−∞ cg(E/cp) dy, u′p′/cp ̸= cg(E/cp)

%+ −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % +−∞∞ cg(E/cp) dy = % +−∞∞ cg(ζz′u′ + q′η′/2) dy = % +−∞∞ (u′u− K + G) dy π′ % tp′dt, u′ − fη′ = −πx′ , v′ + fξ′ = −πy′ , E ≡ K + G = (u′2 + v′2 + N2ζ′2)/2 = (u′ξ′ t + v′ηt′ − ζπzt′ )/2, (−u′ξ′ x − v′ηx′ + ζ′πzx′ )/2 = ζz′u′ + q′η′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨−v′η′, u′η′, ζ′πx′ ⟩⟩/2 (−u′ξ′ y − v′ηy′ + ζ′πzy′ )/2 = ζz′v′ − q′ξ′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨v′ξ′,−u′ξ′, ζ′πy′ ⟩⟩/2 (0.22) ∂t(ζz′u′) + q′v′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′u′ − K + G, v′u′, ζ′p′x⟩⟩, ∂t(ζz′v′) − q′u′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′v′, v′v′ − K + G, ζ′p′y⟩⟩,

A draft manuscript in preparation for J. Fluid Mech. Rapid

1

Toward a seamless global diagnosis for the

horizontal flux of Rossby wave energy

H I D E N O R I A I K I

1

A N D

K O U T A R O U T A K A Y A

2

1Application Laboratory, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama

236-0001, Japan

2Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kyoto, Japan

(Received ?; draft version on January 15, 2015)

A

= A − A

(0.1)

∇ = ⟨⟨∂

x

, ∂

y

, ∂

z

⟩⟩

(0.2)

⟨⟨u

, v

, w

⟩⟩ = ⟨⟨u

g

, v

g

, 0

⟩⟩ + ⟨⟨u

a

, v

a

, w

a

⟩⟩

(0.3)

u

g

= −ψ

y

,

v

g

= ψ

x

,

ψ = p

/f

0

,

(0.4)

ζ

= −ρ

z

= (g/ρ

0

/N

2

= −ψ

z

f

0

/N

2

(0.5)

Q = v

x

− u

y

− f

0

ζ

z

= ψ

xx

+ ψ

yy

+ (ψ

z

f

02

/N

2

)

z

(0.6)

t

xx

+ ψ

yy

+ (ψ

z

f

02

/N

2

)

z

!

"#

$

Q

] + βψ

x

= 0

(0.7)

ψ

x

= −Q

t

(0.8)

t

[

E

#

$!

"

2 x

+ ψ

y2

)/2 + ψ

z2

f

02

/(2N

2

)]+

∇ · ⟨⟨−ψ

xt

ψ

− βψ

2

/2

!

"#

$

Cx gE

,

−ψ

yt

ψ

! "# $

CgyE

,

−ψ

zt

ψf

02

/N

2

!

"#

$

Cz gE

⟩⟩ = 0

(0.9)

t

[

E

#

$!

"

2 x

+ ψ

y2

)/2 + ψ

z2

f

02

/(2N

2

)]+

∇ · ⟨⟨u

p

+ [(f

0

− βy)ψ

2

/2]

y

!

"#

$

Cx gE

, v

p

− [(f

0

− βy)ψ

2

/2]

x

!

"#

$

CgyE

, w

p

!"#$

Cz gE

⟩⟩

= 0

(0.10)

x

= −∇ · ⟨⟨−ψ

x

ψ

x

+ K + G

!

"#

$

ugug−K+G

,

−ψ

x

ψ

y

! "# $

vgug

,

−ψ

z

ψ

x

f

02

/N

2

!

"#

$

ζ′p′ x

⟩⟩

(0.11)

K

≡ (ψ

x2

+ ψ

y2

)/2, G ≡ ψ

z2

f

02

/(2N

2

)

(0.12)

(6)

Toward a seamless global diagnosis for the horizontal flux of Rossby wave energy 3 u′t − (f0 + βy)v′ = −p′x, vt′ + (f0 + βy)u′ = −p′y, ρ′t + w′ρz = 0, u′x + vy′ + wz′ = 0, ⟨⟨u′, v′, w′⟩⟩ = ⟨⟨ξt′, ηt′, ζt⟩⟩, (0.21) ζ′ ≡ −ρ′/ρz = −p′z/N2, K = (u′2 + v′2)/2, G = (N2/2)ζ′2, q′ ≡ vx− uy − (f0 + βy)ζz′, qt′ + βv′ = 0, η′ = −q′/β, (K + G ! "# $ E )t + ∇ · ⟨⟨u′p′, v′p′, w′p′⟩⟩ = 0, cp ≡ ω/k, cg ≡ ∂ω/∂k (E/cp)t + ∇ · ⟨⟨up/c p, v′p′/cp, w′p′/cp⟩⟩ = 0, %+ −∞ u′p′/cp dy = %+

−∞ cg(E/cp) dy, u′p′/cp ̸= cg(E/cp)

%+∞ −∞ u′p′/cp dy = %+−∞∞ cg(E/cp) dy = %+−∞∞ cg(ζz′u′ + q′η′/2) dy = %+−∞∞ (u′u− K + G) dy π′ %tp′dt, u′ − fη′ = −π′x, v′ + fξ′ = −πy′, E ≡ K + G = (u′2+ v′2 + N2ζ′2)/2 = (u′ξ′ t + v′ηt′ − ζπzt′ )/2, (−u′ξ′ x − v′ηx′ + ζ′πzx′ )/2 = ζz′u′ + q′η′/2 +∇ · ⟨⟨−v′η′, u′η′, ζ′πx′⟩⟩/2 (−u′ξ′ y − v′η′y + ζ′πzy′ )/2 = ζz′v′− q′ξ′/2 +∇ · ⟨⟨v′ξ′,−u′ξ′, ζ′π′y⟩⟩/2 (0.22) ∂t(ζz′u′) + q′v′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′u′− K + G, v′u′, ζ′p′x⟩⟩, ∂t(ζz′v′) − q′u′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′v′, v′v′ − K + G, ζ′p′y⟩⟩, " "

(7)
(8)

1980

Table 2: Characteristics of mid-latitude and equatorial waves. The third column (A′

yy ≃ −l2A′) indicates whether waves

are nearly-plane in the meridional direction or not, where A′ is an arbitrary quantity and l is the wavenumber in the

meridional direction. Symbols in the last three columns are defined by q′ ≡ v

x−u′y−fζz′, Λ ≡ [(ξ′p′)x+(η′p′)y+(ζ′p′)z]/2,

K ≡ (u′2 + v′2)/2, G ≡ (N2/2)ζ′2, and E ≡ K + G.

type of waves acronym A′

yy ≃ −l2A′ η′ = −q′/β Λ (v′ξ′ − u′η′)/2

mid-latitude inertia-gravity waves MIGWs yes no (37), 0 (B3), (K − G)/f

mid-latitude Rossby waves MRWs yes yes (36), (37), −E (B2), (B3), 2K/f

equatorial Rossby waves EQWs no yes (36), (37) (B2), (B3)

equatorial mixed Rossby-gravity waves EQWs no yes (36), (37) (B2), (B3)

equatorial Kelvin waves EQWs no yes (36), (37) (B2), (B3)

equatorial inertia-gravity waves EQWs no yes (36), (37) (B2), (B3)

Table 3: List of the ageostrophic versions of the Taylor-Bretherton identity (1) and the Eliassen-Palm relation (2) in previous studies and the present study.

Ageostrophic Taylor-Bretherton identity zonal flux vertical flux

Tung (1986) Eqs. (4.5) and (2.10) absent present

Hayashi and Young (1987) Eq. (2.28) absent absent

McPhaden and Ripa (1990) Eq. (22) absent absent

Takehiro and Hayashi (1992) Eq. (39) absent absent

this study Eq. (28a) present present

Ageostrophic Eliassen-Palm relation zonal flux vertical flux

Ripa (1982) Eq. (2.6d) present absent

Andrews (1983a) Eq. (4.1) absent present

Haynes (1988) Eqs. (3.12a,b) present present

Brunet and Haynes (1996) Eqs. (3.4a-d) present absent

this study Eq. (27a) present present

(9)

• 

•  •  • 

• 

Toward a seamless global diagnosis for the horizontal flux of Rossby wave energy 3

u′t − (f0 + βy)v′ = −p′x, vt′ + (f0 + βy)u′ = −p′y, ρ′t + w′ρz = 0, u′x + vy′ + wz′ = 0, ⟨⟨u′, v′, w′⟩⟩ = ⟨⟨ξt′, ηt′, ζt⟩⟩, (0.21) ζ′ ≡ −ρ′/ρz = −p′z/N2, K = (u′2 + v′2)/2, G = (N2/2)ζ′2, q′ ≡ vx− uy − (f0 + βy)ζz′, qt′ + βv′ = 0, η′ = −q′/β, (K + G ! "# $ E )t + ∇ · ⟨⟨up, vp, wp⟩⟩ = 0, c p ≡ ω/k, cg ≡ ∂ω/∂k (E/cp)t + ∇ · ⟨⟨up/c p, v′p′/cp, w′p′/cp⟩⟩ = 0, % + −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % + −∞ cg(E/cp) dy, % + −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % +−∞∞ cg(E/cp) dy = % +−∞∞ cg(ζz′u′ + q′η′/2) dy = % +−∞∞ (u′u− K + G) dy π′ % tp′dt, u′ − fη′ = −πx′ , v′ + fξ′ = −πy′ , E ≡ K + G = (u′2 + v′2 + N2ζ′2)/2 = (u′ξ′ t + v′ηt′ − ζπzt′ )/2, (−u′ξ′ x − v′ηx′ + ζ′πzx′ )/2 = ζz′u′ + q′η′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨−v′η′, u′η′, ζ′πx′ ⟩⟩/2 (−u′ξ′ y − v′ηy′ + ζ′πzy′ )/2 = ζz′v′ − q′ξ′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨v′ξ′, −u′ξ′, ζ′πy′ ⟩⟩/2 (0.22) ∂t(ζz′u′) + q′v′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′u′ − K + G, v′u′, ζ′p′x⟩⟩, ∂t(ζz′v′) − q′u′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′v′, v′v′ − K + G, ζ′p′y⟩⟩,

Toward a seamless global diagnosis for the horizontal flux of Rossby wave energy 3 u′t − (f0 + βy)v′ = −p′x, vt′ + (f0 + βy)u′ = −p′y, ρ′t + w′ρz = 0, u′x + vy′ + w′z = 0, ⟨⟨u′, v′, w′⟩⟩ = ⟨⟨ξt′, ηt′, ζt⟩⟩, (0.21) ζ′ ≡ −ρ′/ρz = −p′z/N2, K = (u′2 + v′2)/2, G = (N2/2)ζ′2, q′ ≡ vx− uy − (f0 + βy)ζz′, qt′ + βv′ = 0, η′ = −q′/β, (K + G ! "# $ E )t + ∇ · ⟨⟨up, vp, wp⟩⟩ = 0, c p ≡ ω/k, cg ≡ ∂ω/∂k (E/cp)t + ∇ · ⟨⟨up/c p, v′p′/cp, w′p′/cp⟩⟩ = 0, % + −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % + −∞ cg(E/cp) dy, % + −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % +−∞∞ cg(E/cp) dy = % +−∞∞ cg(ζ′ zu′ + q′η′/2) dy = % +−∞∞ (u′u− K + G) dy π′ % tp′dt, u′ − fη′ = −πx′ , v′ + fξ′ = −πy′ , E ≡ K + G = (u′2 + v′2 + N2ζ′2)/2 = (u′ξ′ t + v′ηt′ − ζπzt′ )/2, (−u′ξ′ x − v′ηx′ + ζ′πzx′ )/2 = ζz′u′ + q′η′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨−v′η′, u′η′, ζ′πx′ ⟩⟩/2 (−u′ξ′ y − v′ηy′ + ζ′πzy′ )/2 = ζz′v′ − q′ξ′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨v′ξ′,−u′ξ′, ζ′πy′ ⟩⟩/2 (0.22) ∂t(ζz′u′) + q′v′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′u′ − K + G, v′u′, ζ′p′x⟩⟩, ∂tz′v′) − q′u′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′v′, v′v′ − K + G, ζ′p′y⟩⟩,

(10)

• 

•  •  • 

• 

Toward a seamless global diagnosis for the horizontal flux of Rossby wave energy 3

u′t − (f0 + βy)v′ = −p′x, vt′ + (f0 + βy)u′ = −p′y, ρ′t + w′ρz = 0, u′x + vy′ + wz′ = 0, ⟨⟨u′, v′, w′⟩⟩ = ⟨⟨ξt′, ηt′, ζt⟩⟩, (0.21) ζ′ ≡ −ρ′/ρz = −p′z/N2, K = (u′2 + v′2)/2, G = (N2/2)ζ′2, q′ ≡ vx− uy − (f0 + βy)ζz′, qt′ + βv′ = 0, η′ = −q′/β, (K + G ! "# $ E )t + ∇ · ⟨⟨up, vp, wp⟩⟩ = 0, c p ≡ ω/k, cg ≡ ∂ω/∂k (E/cp)t + ∇ · ⟨⟨up/c p, v′p′/cp, w′p′/cp⟩⟩ = 0, % + −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % + −∞ cg(E/cp) dy, % + −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % +−∞∞ cg(E/cp) dy = % +−∞∞ cg(ζz′u′ + q′η′/2) dy = % +−∞∞ (u′u− K + G) dy π′ % tp′dt, u′ − fη′ = −πx′ , v′ + fξ′ = −πy′ , E ≡ K + G = (u′2 + v′2 + N2ζ′2)/2 = (u′ξ′ t + v′ηt′ − ζπzt′ )/2, (−u′ξ′ x − v′ηx′ + ζ′πzx′ )/2 = ζz′u′ + q′η′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨−v′η′, u′η′, ζ′πx′ ⟩⟩/2 (−u′ξ′ y − v′ηy′ + ζ′πzy′ )/2 = ζz′v′ − q′ξ′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨v′ξ′, −u′ξ′, ζ′πy′ ⟩⟩/2 (0.22) ∂t(ζz′u′) + q′v′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′u′ − K + G, v′u′, ζ′p′x⟩⟩, ∂t(ζz′v′) − q′u′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′v′, v′v′ − K + G, ζ′p′y⟩⟩,

Toward a seamless global diagnosis for the horizontal flux of Rossby wave energy 3 u′t − (f0 + βy)v′ = −p′x, vt′ + (f0 + βy)u′ = −p′y, ρ′t + w′ρz = 0, u′x + vy′ + w′z = 0, ⟨⟨u′, v′, w′⟩⟩ = ⟨⟨ξt′, ηt′, ζt⟩⟩, (0.21) ζ′ ≡ −ρ′/ρz = −p′z/N2, K = (u′2 + v′2)/2, G = (N2/2)ζ′2, q′ ≡ vx− uy − (f0 + βy)ζz′, qt′ + βv′ = 0, η′ = −q′/β, (K + G ! "# $ E )t + ∇ · ⟨⟨up, vp, wp⟩⟩ = 0, c p ≡ ω/k, cg ≡ ∂ω/∂k (E/cp)t + ∇ · ⟨⟨up/c p, v′p′/cp, w′p′/cp⟩⟩ = 0, % + −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % + −∞ cg(E/cp) dy, % + −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % +−∞∞ cg(E/cp) dy = % +−∞∞ cg(ζ′ zu′ + q′η′/2) dy = % +−∞∞ (u′u− K + G) dy π′ % tp′dt, u′ − fη′ = −πx′ , v′ + fξ′ = −πy′ , E ≡ K + G = (u′2 + v′2 + N2ζ′2)/2 = (u′ξ′ t + v′ηt′ − ζπzt′ )/2, (−u′ξ′ x − v′ηx′ + ζ′πzx′ )/2 = ζz′u′ + q′η′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨−v′η′, u′η′, ζ′πx′ ⟩⟩/2 (−u′ξ′ y − v′ηy′ + ζ′πzy′ )/2 = ζz′v′ − q′ξ′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨v′ξ′,−u′ξ′, ζ′πy′ ⟩⟩/2 (0.22) ∂t(ζz′u′) + q′v′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′u′ − K + G, v′u′, ζ′p′x⟩⟩, ∂tz′v′) − q′u′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′v′, v′v′ − K + G, ζ′p′y⟩⟩, Toward a seamless global diagnosis for the horizontal flux of Rossby wave energy 3

u′t − (f0 + βy)v′ = −p′x, vt′ + (f0 + βy)u′ = −p′y, ρ′t + w′ρz = 0, u′x + vy′ + wz′ = 0, ⟨⟨u′, v′, w′⟩⟩ = ⟨⟨ξt′, ηt′, ζt⟩⟩, (0.21) ζ′ ≡ −ρ′/ρz = −p′z/N2, K = (u′2 + v′2)/2, G = (N2/2)ζ′2, q′ ≡ vx− uy − (f0 + βy)ζz′, qt′ + βv′ = 0, η′ = −q′/β, (K + G ! "# $ E )t + ∇ · ⟨⟨up, vp, wp⟩⟩ = 0, c p ≡ ω/k, cg ≡ ∂ω/∂k (E/cp)t + ∇ · ⟨⟨up/c p, v′p′/cp, w′p′/cp⟩⟩ = 0, % + −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % + −∞ cg(E/cp) dy, % + −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % +−∞∞ cg(E/cp) dy = % +−∞∞ cg(ζz′u′ + q′η′/2) dy = % +−∞∞ (u′u− K + G) dy π′ % tp′dt, u′ − fη′ = −πx′ , v′ + fξ′ = −πy′ , E ≡ K + G = (u′2 + v′2 + N2ζ′2)/2 = (u′ξ′ t + v′ηt′ − ζπzt′ )/2, (−u′ξ′ x − v′ηx′ + ζ′πzx′ )/2 = ζz′u′ + q′η′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨−v′η′, u′η′, ζ′πx′ ⟩⟩/2 (−u′ξ′ y − v′ηy′ + ζ′πzy′ )/2 = ζz′v′ − q′ξ′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨v′ξ′, −u′ξ′, ζ′πy′ ⟩⟩/2 (0.22) ∂t(ζz′u′) + q′v′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′u′ − K + G, v′u′, ζ′p′x⟩⟩, ∂t(ζz′v′) − q′u′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′v′, v′v′ − K + G, ζ′p′y⟩⟩,

A draft manuscript in preparation for J. Fluid Mech. Rapid

1

Toward a seamless global diagnosis for the

horizontal flux of Rossby wave energy

H I D E N O R I A I K I

1

A N D

K O U T A R O U T A K A Y A

2

1Application Laboratory, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama

236-0001, Japan

2Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kyoto, Japan

(Received ?; draft version on January 15, 2015)

A

= A − A

(0.1)

∇ = ⟨⟨∂

x

, ∂

y

, ∂

z

⟩⟩

(0.2)

⟨⟨u

, v

, w

⟩⟩ = ⟨⟨u

g

, v

g

, 0

⟩⟩ + ⟨⟨u

a

, v

a

, w

a

⟩⟩

(0.3)

u

g

= −ψ

y

,

v

g

= ψ

x

,

ψ = p

/f

0

,

(0.4)

ζ

= −ρ

z

= (g/ρ

0

/N

2

= −ψ

z

f

0

/N

2

(0.5)

Q = v

x

− u

y

− f

0

ζ

z

= ψ

xx

+ ψ

yy

+ (ψ

z

f

02

/N

2

)

z

(0.6)

t

xx

+ ψ

yy

+ (ψ

z

f

02

/N

2

)

z

!

"#

$

Q

] + βψ

x

= 0

(0.7)

ψ

x

= −Q

t

(0.8)

t

[

E

#

$!

"

2 x

+ ψ

y2

)/2 + ψ

z2

f

02

/(2N

2

)]+

∇ · ⟨⟨−ψ

xt

ψ

− βψ

2

/2

!

"#

$

Cx gE

,

−ψ

yt

ψ

! "# $

CgyE

,

−ψ

zt

ψf

02

/N

2

!

"#

$

Cz gE

⟩⟩ = 0

(0.9)

t

[

E

#

$!

"

2 x

+ ψ

y2

)/2 + ψ

z2

f

02

/(2N

2

)]+

∇ · ⟨⟨u

p

+ [(f

0

− βy)ψ

2

/2]

y

!

"#

$

Cx gE

, v

p

− [(f

0

− βy)ψ

2

/2]

x

!

"#

$

CgyE

, w

p

!"#$

Cz gE

⟩⟩

= 0

(0.10)

x

= −∇ · ⟨⟨−ψ

x

ψ

x

+ K + G

!

"#

$

ugug−K+G

,

−ψ

x

ψ

y

! "# $

vgug

,

−ψ

z

ψ

x

f

02

/N

2

!

"#

$

ζ′p′ x

⟩⟩

(0.11)

K

≡ (ψ

x2

+ ψ

y2

)/2, G ≡ ψ

z2

f

02

/(2N

2

)

(0.12)

(11)

2

H. Aiki and K. Takaya

Qψx

!

"#

$

t

[Q

2

/(

−2β)] +

∇ · ⟨⟨−ψ

x

ψ

x

+ K + G

#

$!

"

ugug−K+G

,

−ψ

x

ψ

y

# $! "

vgug

,

−ψ

z

ψ

x

f

02

/N

2

#

$!

"

ζ′p′ x

⟩⟩ = 0

(0.13)

K = (ψ

x2

+ ψ

y2

)/2, G = ψ

z2

f

02

/(2N

2

),

(0.14)

t

[E/C

px

]+

∇ · ⟨⟨C

gx

(E/C

px

), C

gy

(E/C

px

), C

gz

(E/C

px

)⟩⟩ = 0,

(0.15)

u

t

− (f

0

+ βy)v

= −p

x

,

v

t

+ (f

0

+ βy)u

= −p

y

,

ρ

t

+ w

ρ

z

= 0,

u

x

+ v

y

+ w

z

= 0,

ζ

≡ −ρ

z

= −p

z

/N

2

,

(0.16)

q

≡ v

x

− u

y

− (f

0

+ βy)ζ

z

,

q

t

+ βv

= 0,

⟨⟨u

, v

, w

⟩⟩ = ⟨⟨ξ

t

, η

t

, ζ

t

⟩⟩,

(0.17)

t

z

u

+ η

q

/2]+

∇ · ⟨⟨u

u

− K + G, v

u

, ζ

p

x

⟩⟩,

K = (u

′2

+ v

′2

)/2, G = (N

2

/2)ζ

′2

,

(0.18)

A

L

= A + ξ

A

′ x

+ η

A

′y

+ ζ

A

′z

%

A = A + ζ

A

z

&

A = %

A + ζ

z

A

= A + (ζ

A

)

z

(0.19)

u

Stokes

≡ u

L

− u = ξ

u

x

+ η

u

y

+ ζ

u

z

u

qs

≡ &

u

− u = (ζ

u

)

z

u

bolus

≡ &

u

− %

u = ζ

z

u

(0.20)

2

H. Aiki and K. Takaya

Qψx

!

"#

$

t

[Q

2

/(

−2β)] +

∇ · ⟨⟨−ψ

x

ψ

x

+ K + G

#

$!

"

ugug−K+G

,

−ψ

x

ψ

y

# $! "

vgug

,

−ψ

z

ψ

x

f

02

/N

2

#

$!

"

ζ′p′x

⟩⟩ = 0

(0.13)

K = (ψ

x2

+ ψ

y2

)/2, G = ψ

z2

f

02

/(2N

2

),

(0.14)

t

[E/C

px

]+

∇ · ⟨⟨C

gx

(E/C

px

), C

gy

(E/C

px

), C

gz

(E/C

px

)⟩⟩ = 0,

(0.15)

u

t

− (f

0

+ βy)v

= −p

x

,

v

t

+ (f

0

+ βy)u

= −p

y

,

ρ

t

+ w

ρ

z

= 0,

u

x

+ v

y

+ w

z

= 0,

ζ

≡ −ρ

z

= −p

z

/N

2

,

(0.16)

q

≡ v

x

− u

y

− (f

0

+ βy)ζ

z

,

q

t

+ βv

= 0,

⟨⟨u

, v

, w

⟩⟩ = ⟨⟨ξ

t

, η

t

, ζ

t

⟩⟩,

(0.17)

t

z

u

+ η

q

/2]+

∇ · ⟨⟨u

u

− K + G, v

u

, ζ

p

x

⟩⟩,

K = (u

′2

+ v

′2

)/2, G = (N

2

/2)ζ

′2

,

(0.18)

A

L

= A + ξ

A

x

+ η

A

y

+ ζ

A

z

%

A = A + ζ

A

z

&

A = %

A + ζ

z

A

= A + (ζ

A

)

z

(0.19)

u

Stokes

≡ u

L

− u = ξ

u

x

+ η

u

y

+ ζ

u

z

u

qs

≡ &

u

− u = (ζ

u

)

z

u

bolus

≡ &

u

− %

u = ζ

z

u

(0.20)

Taylor

Toward a seamless global diagnosis for the horizontal flux of Rossby wave energy 3

u′t − (f0 + βy)v′ = −p′x, vt′ + (f0 + βy)u′ = −p′y, ρ′t + w′ρz = 0, u′x + vy′ + wz′ = 0, ⟨⟨u′, v′, w′⟩⟩ = ⟨⟨ξt′, ηt′, ζt⟩⟩, (0.21) ζ′ ≡ −ρ′/ρz = −p′z/N2, K = (u′2 + v′2)/2, G = (N2/2)ζ′2, q′ ≡ vx− uy − (f0 + βy)ζz′, qt′ + βv′ = 0, η′ = −q′/β, (K + G ! "# $ E )t + ∇ · ⟨⟨up, vp, wp⟩⟩ = 0, c p ≡ ω/k, cg ≡ ∂ω/∂k (E/cp)t + ∇ · ⟨⟨up/c p, v′p′/cp, w′p′/cp⟩⟩ = 0, % + −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % + −∞ cg(E/cp) dy, % + −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % +−∞∞ cg(E/cp) dy = % +−∞∞ cg(ζz′u′ + q′η′/2) dy = % +−∞∞ (u′u− K + G) dy π′ % tp′dt, u′ − fη′ = −πx′ , v′ + fξ′ = −πy′ , E ≡ K + G = (u′2 + v′2 + N2ζ′2)/2 = (u′ξ′ t + v′ηt′ − ζπzt′ )/2, (−u′ξ′ x − v′ηx′ + ζ′πzx′ )/2 = ζz′u′ + q′η′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨−v′η′, u′η′, ζ′πx′ ⟩⟩/2 (−u′ξ′ y − v′ηy′ + ζ′πzy′ )/2 = ζz′v′ − q′ξ′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨v′ξ′,−u′ξ′, ζ′πy′ ⟩⟩/2 (0.22) ∂t(ζz′u′) + q′v′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′u′ − K + G, v′u′, ζ′p′x⟩⟩, ∂t(ζz′v′) − q′u′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′v′, v′v′ − K + G, ζ′p′y⟩⟩,

A draft manuscript in preparation for J. Fluid Mech. Rapid

1

Toward a seamless global diagnosis for the

horizontal flux of Rossby wave energy

H I D E N O R I A I K I

1

A N D

K O U T A R O U T A K A Y A

2

1Application Laboratory, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama

236-0001, Japan

2Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kyoto, Japan

(Received ?; draft version on January 15, 2015)

A

= A − A

(0.1)

∇ = ⟨⟨∂

x

, ∂

y

, ∂

z

⟩⟩

(0.2)

⟨⟨u

, v

, w

⟩⟩ = ⟨⟨u

g

, v

g

, 0

⟩⟩ + ⟨⟨u

a

, v

a

, w

a

⟩⟩

(0.3)

u

g

= −ψ

y

,

v

g

= ψ

x

,

ψ = p

/f

0

,

(0.4)

ζ

= −ρ

z

= (g/ρ

0

/N

2

= −ψ

z

f

0

/N

2

(0.5)

Q = v

x

− u

y

− f

0

ζ

z

= ψ

xx

+ ψ

yy

+ (ψ

z

f

02

/N

2

)

z

(0.6)

t

xx

+ ψ

yy

+ (ψ

z

f

02

/N

2

)

z

!

"#

$

Q

] + βψ

x

= 0

(0.7)

ψ

x

= −Q

t

(0.8)

t

[

E

#

$!

"

2 x

+ ψ

y2

)/2 + ψ

z2

f

02

/(2N

2

)]+

∇ · ⟨⟨−ψ

xt

ψ

− βψ

2

/2

!

"#

$

Cx gE

,

−ψ

yt

ψ

! "# $

CgyE

,

−ψ

zt

ψf

02

/N

2

!

"#

$

Cz gE

⟩⟩ = 0

(0.9)

t

[

E

#

$!

"

2 x

+ ψ

y2

)/2 + ψ

z2

f

02

/(2N

2

)]+

∇ · ⟨⟨u

p

+ [(f

0

− βy)ψ

2

/2]

y

!

"#

$

Cx g E

, v

p

− [(f

0

− βy)ψ

2

/2]

x

!

"#

$

CgyE

, w

p

!"#$

Cz gE

⟩⟩

= 0

(0.10)

x

= −∇ · ⟨⟨−ψ

x

ψ

x

+ K + G

!

"#

$

ugug−K+G

,

−ψ

x

ψ

y

! "# $

vgug

,

−ψ

z

ψ

x

f

02

/N

2

!

"#

$

ζ′p′x

⟩⟩

(0.11)

K

≡ (ψ

x2

+ ψ

y2

)/2, G ≡ ψ

z2

f

02

/(2N

2

)

(0.12)

(12)
(13)

Toward a seamless global diagnosis for the horizontal flux of Rossby wave energy 3 u′t − (f0 + βy)v′ = −p′x, vt′ + (f0 + βy)u′ = −p′y, ρ′t + w′ρz = 0, u′x + vy′ + wz′ = 0, ⟨⟨u′, v′, w′⟩⟩ = ⟨⟨ξt′, ηt′, ζt⟩⟩, (0.21) ζ′ ≡ −ρ′/ρz = −p′z/N2, K = (u′2 + v′2)/2, G = (N2/2)ζ′2, q′ ≡ vx− uy − (f0 + βy)ζz′, qt′ + βv′ = 0, η′ = −q′/β, (K + G ! "# $ E )t + ∇ · ⟨⟨up, vp, wp⟩⟩ = 0, c p ≡ ω/k, cg ≡ ∂ω/∂k (E/cp)t + ∇ · ⟨⟨up/c p, v′p′/cp, w′p′/cp⟩⟩ = 0, % + −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % + −∞ cg(E/cp) dy, % + −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % +−∞∞ cg(E/cp) dy = % +−∞∞ cg(ζz′u′ + q′η′/2) dy = % +−∞∞ (u′u− K + G) dy π′ % tp′dt, u′ − fη′ = −πx′ , v′ + fξ′ = −πy′ , E ≡ K + G = (u′2 + v′2 + N2ζ′2)/2 = (u′ξ′ t + v′ηt′ − ζπzt′ )/2, (−u′ξ′ x − v′ηx′ + ζ′πzx′ )/2 = ζz′u′ + q′η′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨−v′η′, u′η′, ζ′πx′ ⟩⟩/2 (−u′ξ′ y − v′ηy′ + ζ′πzy′ )/2 = ζz′v′ − q′ξ′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨v′ξ′, −u′ξ′, ζ′πy′ ⟩⟩/2 (0.22) ∂t(ζz′u′) + q′v′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′u′ − K + G, v′u′, ζ′p′x⟩⟩, ∂t(ζz′v′) − q′u′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′v′, v′v′ − K + G, ζ′p′y⟩⟩,

Toward a seamless global diagnosis for the horizontal flux of Rossby wave energy 3

u′t − (f0 + βy)v′ = −p′x, vt′ + (f0 + βy)u′ = −p′y, ρ′t + w′ρz = 0, u′x + vy′ + w′z = 0, ⟨⟨u′, v′, w′⟩⟩ = ⟨⟨ξt′, ηt′, ζt⟩⟩, (0.21) ζ′ ≡ −ρ′/ρz = −p′z/N2, K = (u′2 + v′2)/2, G = (N2/2)ζ′2, q′ ≡ vx− uy − (f0 + βy)ζz′, qt′ + βv′ = 0, η′ = −q′/β, (K + G ! "# $ E )t + ∇ · ⟨⟨up, vp, wp⟩⟩ = 0, c p ≡ ω/k, cg ≡ ∂ω/∂k (E/cp)t + ∇ · ⟨⟨up/c p, v′p′/cp, w′p′/cp⟩⟩ = 0, % + −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % + −∞ cg(E/cp) dy, % + −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % +−∞∞ cg(E/cp) dy = % +−∞∞ cg(ζ′ zu′ + q′η′/2) dy = % +−∞∞ (u′u− K + G) dy π′ % tp′dt, u′ − fη′ = −πx′ , v′ + fξ′ = −πy′ , E ≡ K + G = (u′2 + v′2 + N2ζ′2)/2 = (u′ξ′ t + v′ηt′ − ζπzt′ )/2, (−u′ξ′ x − v′ηx′ + ζ′πzx′ )/2 = ζz′u′ + q′η′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨−v′η′, u′η′, ζ′πx′ ⟩⟩/2 (−u′ξ′ y − v′ηy′ + ζ′πzy′ )/2 = ζz′v′ − q′ξ′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨v′ξ′,−u′ξ′, ζ′πy′ ⟩⟩/2 (0.22) ∂t(ζz′u′) + q′v′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′u′ − K + G, v′u′, ζ′p′x⟩⟩, ∂tz′v′) − q′u′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′v′, v′v′ − K + G, ζ′p′y⟩⟩, Toward a seamless global diagnosis for the horizontal flux of Rossby wave energy 3

u′t − (f0 + βy)v′ = −p′x, vt′ + (f0 + βy)u′ = −p′y, ρ′t + w′ρz = 0, u′x + vy′ + wz′ = 0, ⟨⟨u′, v′, w′⟩⟩ = ⟨⟨ξt′, ηt′, ζt⟩⟩, (0.21) ζ′ ≡ −ρ′/ρz = −p′z/N2, K = (u′2 + v′2)/2, G = (N2/2)ζ′2, q′ ≡ vx− uy − (f0 + βy)ζz′, qt′ + βv′ = 0, η′ = −q′/β, (K + G ! "# $ E )t + ∇ · ⟨⟨up, vp, wp⟩⟩ = 0, c p ≡ ω/k, cg ≡ ∂ω/∂k (E/cp)t + ∇ · ⟨⟨up/c p, v′p′/cp, w′p′/cp⟩⟩ = 0, % + −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % + −∞ cg(E/cp) dy, % + −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % +−∞∞ cg(E/cp) dy = % +−∞∞ cg(ζz′u′ + q′η′/2) dy = % +−∞∞ (u′u− K + G) dy π′ % tp′dt, u′ − fη′ = −πx′ , v′ + fξ′ = −πy′ , E ≡ K + G = (u′2 + v′2 + N2ζ′2)/2 = (u′ξ′ t + v′ηt′ − ζπzt′ )/2, (−u′ξ′ x − v′ηx′ + ζ′πzx′ )/2 = ζz′u′ + q′η′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨−v′η′, u′η′, ζ′πx′ ⟩⟩/2 (−u′ξ′ y − v′ηy′ + ζ′πzy′ )/2 = ζz′v′ − q′ξ′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨v′ξ′, −u′ξ′, ζ′πy′ ⟩⟩/2 (0.22) ∂t(ζz′u′) + q′v′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′u′ − K + G, v′u′, ζ′p′x⟩⟩, ∂t(ζz′v′) − q′u′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′v′, v′v′ − K + G, ζ′p′y⟩⟩,

A draft manuscript in preparation for J. Fluid Mech. Rapid

1

Toward a seamless global diagnosis for the

horizontal flux of Rossby wave energy

H I D E N O R I A I K I

1

A N D

K O U T A R O U T A K A Y A

2

1Application Laboratory, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokohama

236-0001, Japan

2Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kyoto, Japan

(Received ?; draft version on January 15, 2015)

A

= A − A

(0.1)

∇ = ⟨⟨∂

x

, ∂

y

, ∂

z

⟩⟩

(0.2)

⟨⟨u

, v

, w

⟩⟩ = ⟨⟨u

g

, v

g

, 0

⟩⟩ + ⟨⟨u

a

, v

a

, w

a

⟩⟩

(0.3)

u

g

= −ψ

y

,

v

g

= ψ

x

,

ψ = p

/f

0

,

(0.4)

ζ

= −ρ

z

= (g/ρ

0

/N

2

= −ψ

z

f

0

/N

2

(0.5)

Q = v

x

− u

y

− f

0

ζ

z

= ψ

xx

+ ψ

yy

+ (ψ

z

f

02

/N

2

)

z

(0.6)

t

xx

+ ψ

yy

+ (ψ

z

f

02

/N

2

)

z

!

"#

$

Q

] + βψ

x

= 0

(0.7)

ψ

x

= −Q

t

(0.8)

t

[

E

#

$!

"

2 x

+ ψ

y2

)/2 + ψ

z2

f

02

/(2N

2

)]+

∇ · ⟨⟨−ψ

xt

ψ

− βψ

2

/2

!

"#

$

Cx gE

,

−ψ

yt

ψ

! "# $

CgyE

,

−ψ

zt

ψf

02

/N

2

!

"#

$

Cz gE

⟩⟩ = 0

(0.9)

t

[

E

#

$!

"

2 x

+ ψ

y2

)/2 + ψ

z2

f

02

/(2N

2

)]+

∇ · ⟨⟨u

p

+ [(f

0

− βy)ψ

2

/2]

y

!

"#

$

Cx gE

, v

p

− [(f

0

− βy)ψ

2

/2]

x

!

"#

$

CgyE

, w

p

!"#$

Cz gE

⟩⟩

= 0

(0.10)

x

= −∇ · ⟨⟨−ψ

x

ψ

x

+ K + G

!

"#

$

ugug−K+G

,

−ψ

x

ψ

y

! "# $

vgug

,

−ψ

z

ψ

x

f

02

/N

2

!

"#

$

ζ′p′ x

⟩⟩

(0.11)

K

≡ (ψ

x2

+ ψ

y2

)/2, G ≡ ψ

z2

f

02

/(2N

2

)

(0.12)

† Email address for correspondence: [email protected]

4 H. Aiki and K. Takaya

tz′u′ + q′η′/2) + ∇ · ⟨⟨u′u′ − K + G, v′u′, ζ′p′x⟩⟩ = 0,tz′v′ − q′ξ′/2) + ∇ · ⟨⟨u′v′, v′v′ − K + G, ζ′p′y⟩⟩ = β(v′ξ′ − u′η′)/2, AL = A + ξ′A′x + η′A′y + ζ′A′z ! A = A + ζ′A′z " A = !A + ζz′A′ = A + (ζ′A′)z (0.23) uStokes ≡ uL − u = ξ′u′x + η′u′y + ζ′u′z uqs ≡ "u − u = (ζu′)z ubolus ≡ "u − !u = ζ′ zu′ (0.24) ∂tu + ∇ · (Uu) − fv = −px − ∇ · ⟨⟨uu, vu, wu⟩⟩, (0.25) ∂t[u + (ζ′u′)z # $% & b u ] + ∇ · (Uu) − f[v + (ζ′v′)z # $% & b v ] = −∂xp − ∇ · ⟨⟨u′u′, v′u′, ζ′p′x⟩⟩, (0.26) ∂t[u + ζ′u′z # $% & e u ] + ∇ · (Uu) − f[v + ζ′v′ z # $% & e v ] − (v′ x − u′y)v′ = −∂x[p + ζ′p′z + (ζ′2/2)pzz # $% & −G # $% & e p + (u′2 + v′2)/2 # $% & K ] (0.27) ∂t[ ζz′u′ #$%& ubolus ] + (v′ x − u′y − fζz′) # $% & q′ v′+ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′u− K + G, vu, ζp′ x⟩⟩ (0.28) v′ = −qt′/β (0.29) Q† = ψxx + ψyy − (ψzz)zf00/g v†Q† = ⟨⟨∂y, ∂z⟩⟩ · ⟨⟨ψxψy, ⟩⟩ (0.30)

4 H. Aiki and K. Takaya

tz′u′ + q′η′/2) + ∇ · ⟨⟨u′u′ − K + G, v′u′, ζ′p′x⟩⟩ = 0,tz′v′ − q′ξ′/2) + ∇ · ⟨⟨u′v′, v′v′ − K + G, ζ′p′y⟩⟩ = β(v′ξ′ − u′η′)/2, AL = A + ξ′A′ x + η′A′y + ζ′A′z ! A = A + ζ′A′ z " A = !A + ζ′ zA′ = A + (ζ′A′)z (0.23) uStokes ≡ uL − u = ξu′ x + η′u′y + ζ′u′z uqs ≡ "u − u = (ζ′u′)z ubolus ≡ "u − !u = ζz′u′ (0.24) ∂tu + ∇ · (Uu) − fv = −px − ∇ · ⟨⟨u′u′, v′u′, w′u′⟩⟩, (0.25) ∂t[u + (ζ′u′)z # $% & b u ] + ∇ · (Uu) − f[v + (ζ′v′)z # $% & b v ] = −∂xp − ∇ · ⟨⟨u′u′, v′u′, ζ′p′x⟩⟩, (0.26) ∂t[u + ζ′u′ z # $% & e u ] + ∇ · (Uu) − f[v + ζ′v′ z # $% & e v ] − (v′ x − u′y)v′ = −∂x[p + ζ′p′z + (ζ′2/2)pzz # $% & −G # $% & e p + (u′2 + v′2)/2 # $% & K ] (0.27) ∂t[ ζ′ zu′ #$%& ubolus ] + (v′ x − u′y − fζz′) # $% & q′ v′+ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′u− K + G, vu, ζp′ x⟩⟩ (0.28) v′ = −qt′/β (0.29) Q† = ψxx + ψyy − (ψzz)zf00/g v†Q† = ⟨⟨∂y, ∂z⟩⟩ · ⟨⟨ψxψy,⟩⟩ (0.30) "

2 H. Aiki and K. Takaya

∂t[ E ! "# $ (ψ2 x + ψy2)/2 + ψz2f02/(2N2)]+ ∇ · ⟨⟨−ψxtψ − βψ2/2 # $! " Cx gE , −ψytψ # $! " CgyE , −ψztψf02/N2 # $! " Cz gE ⟩⟩ = 0 (0.10) ∂t[ E ! "# $ (ψ2 x + ψy2)/2 + ψz2f02/(2N2)]+ ∇ · ⟨⟨u′p′ + [(f0 − βy)ψ2/2]y # $! " Cx gE , v′p′ − [(f0 − βy)ψ2/2]x # $! " CgyE , w′p′ #$!" Cz gE ⟩⟩ = 0 (0.11) Qψx #$!" Qvg = −∇ · ⟨⟨−ψxψx + K + G # $! " ugug−K+G , −ψxψy # $! " vgug , −ψzψxf02/N2 # $! " ζ′p′ x ⟩⟩ (0.12) K = (ψx2 + ψy2)/2, G = ψz2f02/(2N2) (0.13) Qψx ! "# $ ∂t[Q2/(−2β)] + ∇ · ⟨⟨−ψxψx + K + G # $! " ugug−K+G , −ψxψy # $! " vgug , −ψzψxf02/N2 # $! " ζ′p′ x ⟩⟩ = 0 (0.14) K = (ψx2 + ψy2)/2, G = ψz2f02/(2N2), (0.15) ∂t[ E/Cpx ! "# $ Q2/(−2β)]+ ∇ · ⟨⟨ugug − K + G # $! " Cx g(E/Cpx) , v#$!"gug Cgy(E/Cx p) , ζ′p′x #$!" Cz g(E/Cpx) ⟩⟩ = 0 (0.16) K = (ψx2 + ψy2)/2, G = ψz2f02/(2N2), (0.17) ζ′(u′ z − wx′ ) (0.18) −ζ′(u′ z − wx′ ) (0.19) ∂t[E/cp]+

(14)
(15)

Toward a seamless global diagnosis for the horizontal flux of Rossby wave energy 3 u′t − (f0 + βy)v′ = −p′x, vt′ + (f0 + βy)u′ = −p′y, ρ′t + w′ρz = 0, u′x + vy′ + wz′ = 0, ⟨⟨u′, v′, w′⟩⟩ = ⟨⟨ξt′, ηt′, ζt⟩⟩, (0.21) ζ′ ≡ −ρ′/ρz = −p′z/N2, K = (u′2 + v′2)/2, G = (N2/2)ζ′2, q′ ≡ vx− uy − (f0 + βy)ζz′, qt′ + βv′ = 0, η′ = −q′/β, (K + G ! "# $ E )t + ∇ · ⟨⟨u′p′, v′p′, w′p′⟩⟩ = 0, cp ≡ ω/k, cg ≡ ∂ω/∂k (E/cp)t + ∇ · ⟨⟨up/c p, v′p′/cp, w′p′/cp⟩⟩ = 0, % + −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % +

−∞ cg(E/cp) dy, u′p′/cp ̸= cg(E/cp)

%+ −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % +−∞∞ cg(E/cp) dy = % +−∞∞ cg(ζz′u′ + q′η′/2) dy = % +−∞∞ (u′u− K + G) dy π′ % tp′dt, u′ − fη′ = −πx′ , v′ + fξ′ = −πy′ , E ≡ K + G = (u′2 + v′2 + N2ζ′2)/2 = (u′ξ′ t + v′ηt′ − ζπzt′ )/2, (−u′ξ′ x − v′ηx′ + ζ′πzx′ )/2 = ζz′u′ + q′η′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨−v′η′, u′η′, ζ′πx′ ⟩⟩/2 (−u′ξ′ y − v′ηy′ + ζ′πzy′ )/2 = ζz′v′ − q′ξ′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨v′ξ′,−u′ξ′, ζ′πy′ ⟩⟩/2 (0.22) ∂t(ζz′u′) + q′v′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′u′ − K + G, v′u′, ζ′p′x⟩⟩, ∂t(ζz′v′) − q′u′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′v′, v′v′ − K + G, ζ′p′y⟩⟩,

Toward a seamless global diagnosis for the horizontal flux of Rossby wave energy 3

u′t − (f0 + βy)v′ = −p′x, vt′ + (f0 + βy)u′ = −p′y, ρ′t + w′ρz = 0, u′x + vy′ + w′z = 0, ⟨⟨u′, v′, w′⟩⟩ = ⟨⟨ξt′, ηt′, ζt⟩⟩, (0.21) ζ′ ≡ −ρ′/ρz = −p′z/N2, K = (u′2 + v′2)/2, G = (N2/2)ζ′2, q′ ≡ vx− uy − (f0 + βy)ζz′, qt′ + βv′ = 0, η′ = −q′/β, (K + G ! "# $ E )t + ∇ · ⟨⟨up, vp, wp⟩⟩ = 0, c p ≡ ω/k, cg ≡ ∂ω/∂k (E/cp)t + ∇ · ⟨⟨up/c p, v′p′/cp, w′p′/cp⟩⟩ = 0, % + −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % +

−∞ cg(E/cp) dy, u′p′/cp ̸= cg(E/cp)

%+ −∞ u′p′/cp dy = % +−∞∞ cg(E/cp) dy = % +−∞∞ cg(ζz′u′ + q′η′/2) dy = % +−∞∞ (u′u− K + G) dy π′ % tp′dt, u′ − fη′ = −πx′ , v′ + fξ′ = −πy′ , E ≡ K + G = (u′2 + v′2 + N2ζ′2)/2 = (u′ξ′ t + v′ηt′ − ζπzt′ )/2, (−u′ξ′ x − v′ηx′ + ζ′πzx′ )/2 = ζz′u′ + q′η′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨−v′η′, u′η′, ζ′πx′ ⟩⟩/2 (−u′ξ′ y − v′ηy′ + ζ′πzy′ )/2 = ζz′v′ − q′ξ′/2 + ∇ · ⟨⟨v′ξ′,−u′ξ′, ζ′πy′ ⟩⟩/2 (0.22) ∂tz′u′) + q′v′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′u′ − K + G, v′u′, ζ′p′x⟩⟩, ∂t(ζz′v′) − q′u′ = −∇ · ⟨⟨u′v′, v′v′ − K + G, ζ′p′y⟩⟩,

参照

関連したドキュメント

に時には少量に,容れてみる.白.血球は血小板

ベクトル計算と解析幾何 移動,移動の加法 移動と実数との乗法 ベクトル空間の概念 平面における基底と座標系

We prove the existence of solutions for an elliptic partial differential equation having more general flux term than either p-Laplacian or flux term of the Leray-Lions type

Thus, the present study is actually quite different and can be considered as an improvement of [6] and a generalization of [3] to quasilinear (monotone operators in the gradient)

For strictly hyperbolic systems of conservation laws with Lipschitz contin- uous flux-functions we generalize Lax's genuine nonlinearity condition and shock ad-

SLCポンプによる注水 [津波AMG ③-2] MUWCによる注水 [津波AMG ③-1] D/DFPによる注水 [津波AMG ③-3]

・最大津波流速 3.2m/s による船尾方向への流 圧力 19.0tonf に対し,船尾スプリング+ヘ ッドラインの係留力は約 51tonf であり対抗 可能.. ・最大津波流速

全ての個体から POPs が検出。地球規模での汚染が確認された北半球は、南半球より 汚染レベルが高い。 HCHs は、 PCBs ・ DDTs と異なる傾向、極域で相対的に高い汚染