A Process of Co-working Implementation of Regional Industrial Policy
Abstract
In this study, I discussed about the path from the policy knowledge to the policy formation in the implementation process of regional industrial policy programs. Creating innovation is the key concept for reinvigorating the regional economy that has lost vitality because of the de-industrialization or the population ageing. The regional innovation system attracts great deal of attention for many industrial countries. Also the industrial cluster is one of the Regional Innovation Systems. The cluster policy is the public promotion for developing such a regional economic system. I recognize several distinct features in the way of implementation of the cluster policy. Especially, it is an important point that the information on regional economy or industry is reflected for the policy. So Japanese cluster policy programs are not drawn up by the national government, and they had better be planned and implemented in collaboration among the regional bureaus, local governments, business associations, and other regional actors.
In the area of the research on policy learning, there are several themes like who learn (subjects) , learn what (targets) . The path to the policy is also one of the important themes. I supposed that implementation process is the path from the policy knowledge to the policy formation.
For discussion of the path to the policy formation, I investigated two themes. The first one is (A) the reason why the information on the regional economy and industries are important for the implementation of policy programs. The second is (B) how the regional information should be treated in the implementation process. I made following three researches to approach them.
For theme (A), I made researchs from the viewpoints of i) The industrial structure in a region and ii) the economic actors network. I investigated I-O tables and surveyed the case of building the firms network. As a result, the changing structure of regional industry and firms group is made clear. And we observed the dynamic aspects for firms to create the new alliances.
For theme (B), I made a research from the viewpoint of iii) key-person s behavior. I studied the two model cases of the policy implementation process, and found the common role of key persons. They decided the network member, gathered information, selected the way of its use for planning the policy programs.
All those researches suggested that the implementation of cluster policy require the regional information, and the process of co-working implementation is the path to the policy making.
1985
RIS Regional Innovation System RIS
1 1 9 2 16 3 40 4 44 5 51 6 64 7 72 8 80 9 95 109 111 115
1 1985
RIS Regional Innovation System RIS
2012 4
4 path
2 M. E.
OECD 1971 The Industrial Policy of 14 Member Countries
2005 1950
3 1960 1997 2005 3 2005 OECD 2 1975 (2009) 4 1960 1970 1990 1990 2001
4 1985 IT 1999 1 2001 2009 6 6 2009
5 2004 1990
1999
2004
Shaffer and Hilman 2000
6 17 88 2010 Bottom-up Innovation 2007 OECD 2004 Innovative America 2010
National Innovation System Regional
Innovation System
Kodama 2008 Kwak 2004
7 2010 2008 1 2 3 4 4 5 6
8
7
8
9 1 2 3 1 1 1886 2006
10 1909 1 3 1 2006 4 (2005)
11 ICT
2
2005
12 Krugman (1993) 3 3 (1998) 3 (2005)
13 2 2005 NIS RIS NIS NIS NIS NIS NIS RIS NIS(RIS) RIS Camagni 2000
14 2000 (2009) 4 2010 5 2007
15 3
80
16 2 2 3 1 85 90 95 ( ) 1985 1990 1995 3 85 95 85
17 (2)
20 (2)
1985 90 95
21 2 7 40 1985 30 90 23 95 21 30 2-8 2 8 30 10 20 2-9
22 40 85 31 90 28 95 19 90 95 85 95 2 9 1985 90 95 2-10 85 2 10 85 34.5% 65.5
23 1990 95 2-11 2-12 2 11 90 1990 1985 90 95 90 90 2 12 95
24 3 2 3 85 90 95 1985 1990 1995 1995
25 2-13 2 13 85 90 7.4 90 95 85 90
26 90 95 85 90 90 95 2 14 2-14 85 90 95 85 95
27 85 54.1 90 46.5 95 43.4 85 55.4 90 52.0 95 39.1 90 90 3 85 90 90 95 85 85 90 90 95 t 0 t t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 t 0
28 t = 90 0 = 85 t = 95 0 = 90 2-15 2-16 2 15 CT (%) - (A) 2 16 CT (%) - (B) Control Totals
29 85 90 90 95 85 90 90 95 85 90 4
30 2-17 2 17 100 85 90 90 95 85 2-18 85 90 90 95
31 2 18 100 2 19 100 2-19 85 90 90 95
32 85 90 85 90 85 90 95 2-20 2 20 85 90
33 90 95 85 90 95 2-21 2 21 85 90 90 95 85 90 2-22
34 2 22 2-22 90 95 85 85 90 95 85 95 85 90 85 90 95
35 5 3 3 1985 90 2 2 1990 95 85 90 95 90 95 85 90 90 95 85 90 90 95
36 90 95 95 85 95 90 95 90 95 10
40 3 2006 2 Ciobanu et al 2004 1990 1999 1 1 3-1
41 2 90 3-1 2006 2 1985 5 I-(I-M-N)A -1 N 1
42 2 1 3-2 1 B/A 1985 1990 2000 3-2 3 4 2 2
43 B/A
44 4 1980 (2009) 1 (1) 2002 1980
45 1980 (2) (1985) (competitiveness advantage) 1 Cool and Schendel(1988) resource
46
2
3
(3)
2002
1990 The Third Italy
47
Granovetter(1973) (strong tie) (weak tie)
4 Uzzi 1996 Gulatti 1998 (Structural Embeddedness) Embeddedness (2003) Gulatti (2002) 2 (dyad) 1 Uzzi(1997) (2009) Burt(2001) 5 Gulati(1998)
48
(Access) (timing) (referrals) Kogut(1989)
stability Gulati 2006 Helfat 2007 2 (1) Gulati(1998) Potential Partner (2002) (2)
49 Gulati (1999)
Where Do Inter-Organizational Networks Come From
Gulati(1998)
2005
3
51 5 1 2003 1 Kogut 1989 stability 100%
52 2005 Gulati 1998 Embeddedness 2003 dyad network dyad network dyad network 5 5 IT 2 1 2
53 2 2005 5-1 5-1 1 2 3 4 5 3 4
54 Kogut 1989 5-2 5-2 Multi-Layer Network
A
ctiveF
undamentalP
otentialA
ctiveF
undamentalP
otential MLN (Multi-Layer Network) MLN55 3 5 5 5 IT Robot Technology 3 1 1 20 1 5 a) -1 16
56 b) 2 6 c) -2 5 d) IT 4 e) 5 2 5 5-3 2
57 5-3 3 5-4 5-4 3 4
58 4 5 4 3 4 2 dyad network 1 dyad 5-4 0.5 5
59 4 stability network 2 network network 3 network
60 network
61
network
network
Burt 2001 2002
62 dyad network 5-5 5-5 2 5
63 dyad network
64 6
1
1
65 IT 2009 IT IT IT IT IT 22 3 2 7 2,000 400 393 IT IT 6 6 4 1 1 2 3 5 1 2007 IT
66 IT IT (1) IT (2) IT (3) IT (4) IT (1) (4) IT 2 IT IT (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) 1 9 IT 3 IT (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) 10 4 1 5 IT 3 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)IT IT (6)IT 6 1 10
67 383 6-1 6-1 6-2 45.5 6-2 3 3 2 6 0.041 95%
68 0 6-3 ( ) IT IT IT IT
69 6-4 1 IT 10 z 6-4 6-5
70 6-5 2 3 6-4 2 2 6-6 6-6 4 IT IT
71 3
IT IT
72 7
6
73 NPO
NPO
2006
74 2
(2010) 7-1
Mazmanian and Sabatier 1983
3 5
2 5
3
5
75
7-1
(2010)
Porter(1998)
2 input formation output
formation
6
76 7-2
77 1 2 4 3 1 2 4 3 7-3 A a B a
78 3
79
(2006) (2009)
4
80 8 2012 4 2 3 IT 4 5 1 2009 2009
81 2003 1996 2011 2 socialization externalization 2007 middlemen Heclo 1974 policy entrepreneur 2012
82 NPO 2007 2008 2008 2006 2 IT IT 2008 3 3
83 3 2008 IT IT 2009 IT 2010 2008 IT IT IT e-Japan IT IT 2007 IT IT IT IT IT IT 2009 IT IT IT 2007 IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT 2010 IT
84 IT IT IT IT 3 1 4 2
85
IT IT
3
86 8-1 IT IT 2 3 3
87 8-2
8-2
88 IT IT NPO IT 4
90 1. 1 IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT IT 2003 IT IT IT 2 2008 IT IT 2008 IT IT IT IT IT
91 IT IT B B Beginner IT 2009 IT 2009 IT 2010 IT IT 2. 1 2008 21
92 IT
Advanced Scientific Technology & Management Research Institute of Kyoto ASTEM
ASTEM ASTEM ICT 1988 20 ASTEM IT 2008 10 ICT IT ICT 2008 2 2008 IT ASTEM IT 2008 IT IT IT IT
93 IT IT ASTEM 2008 IT ASTEM IT IT IT 2009 2009 IT 2008 ASTEM ASTEM IT IT IT ASTEM IT SaaS ASTEM
94 2010 IT in IT IT IT 2009 IT 2010 ASTEM ASTEM
95 9
Embeddedness 2003
(2009)
96 1 (2005) 4 3 3 (2006) (2005) (2006) (2005) 3 (2011) Nakajima(2010) (2005) (2007) (2006)
97 TLO 2 (2008) (2009) 9-1 2009
98 9-1
99
(2003) IT
( 2012)
100 (2011) 4 1 21 2009 10 9-2 9-2 2
101 (2009) (2004) 3 (2004) 1 (2009)
102 (2009) (2009) 5 (1) 10 4 9-2
103 4 5 (2) 2 A B C
104 A C 10 1 9 D (3) D 1 E F G H
105 H (4) 2009 I J K L
106 1 J L 2 I K 9-3 K
107 9-3
6
108
109
2012
2007
111 1) 2006 pp. 31 33 2) 2008 3 3) 2005 pp. 83 4 2002 5) 2009 p. 78 3 1) 2003 2000 2) 4 1) 2002a p. 360 2) absorptive capacity
Cohen & Levinthal (1990)
3) [ ]
4) 2006
112 5 1) frequency 2) A a B A B A a 3) 1 5 5 1 4) 4 5) frequency 6 1) (2005) 2) (2008) pp. 77-78 3) 8 1) 3 24 4
113 IT 24 3 2) 8 ( ) ( ) http://www.city.echizen.lg.jp/office/060/010/risihokyuu.html ( ) ( ) ASTEM http://www.astem.or.jp/business/support/oscar 9 1) 1 2012 8 2) http://www.meti.go.jp/press/20090612007/20090612007.html 3)
114 (2004) 4) 9-2 22 3 http://sangakukan.jp/top/databook_contents/2009/1_sgk_renkeidata/7_research_ce nter/pages/2009_30/2009_30.html
115
Boltho, Andrea, Was Japan s Industreal Policy Successful , , 1985, 9, pp. 187-201.
Bryson, J. R., and Daniels, P. W., Business Link, Strong Ties, and the Walls of Silence: Small and Medium-sized Enterprises and External Business-Service Expertise ,
, Vol. 16, 1998, pp. 265-280.
Kodama, Toshihiro, The Role of Intermediation and Absorptive Capacity in Facilitating University-Industry Linkages An Empirical Study of TAMA in Japan , , Vol. 37, 2008, pp. 1224-1240.
Kwak, N., D. V. Shah, and R. Lance Holbert, Connecting, Trusting, and Participating: The Direct and Interactive Effects of Social Associations ,
, Vol. 57, No. 4, 2004, pp. 643-652.
Porter, M. E. , Harvard Business School press,1998. M. E. 1999
Rowley, Tim, Dean Behrens and David Krackhardt, Redundant Governance Structures: An Analysis of Structural and Relational Embeddedness in the Steel and Semiconductor Industries , , Vol. 21, 2000, pp. 369-386.
Shaffer, Brian and Hilman, A. J. The Development of Business-Government Strategies by Diversified Firms , , Vol. 21. 2000, pp. 175-190.
Song, Haigang, Toward a Regional Knowledge Creation Management Framework for Cluster Promotions , Vol. 21, No. 3/4, 2006. pp. 307-321. Waluszewski, Alexandra, Is It Possible to Create a Prospering Biotech Valley
And what s the recipe: instant industrialization or seven decades of interaction concerning how to create use of resources , , Vol. 20, No. 1, 2005, pp. 19-30. 10 2012 pp. 1-16 55 1 2005 pp. 113-132 ESRI Discussion Paper Series 2007 No. 186
116
8 2 2009 pp. 37-70
ESRI Discussion Paper Series No. 262 2011 320 2011 1988 No. 43-1 pp. 51-59 2008 2004 pp. 131-157 21 23 1 2010 pp. 107-129 47 1 2001 27 1999 pp. 11-22 49 1 2010 pp. 52-56 47 6 2008 pp. 33-40 -1 48 4 2009 pp. 29-38 -2 48 4 2009 pp. 37-45 90 54 6 2003 pp. 23-31
Discussion Paper No. 52 2009
Krugman, P. R., Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press, 1993.
Porter, M. E. , New York: Free Press, 1980. M. E. 1985 Porter, M. E. , Harvard Business School press,1998. M. E.
117
1999
Sassen, S., , Princeton University Press,
2001. 2008 2002 2009 MINERVA 2005 pp. 78-82 2006 1990 46 4 2000 pp. 323-336 2002SUM., 2002 pp. 69-85 7 2009 pp. 21-42 MINERVA 2005 pp. 131-139 2005 pp. 1-30 18 2007 pp. 22-43 MINERVA 2005 pp. 29-36 10 - - 2000 2001 02 2001 2003 2003
Ciobanu, C., K. Mattas and D. Psaltopoulos, Structural Changes in Less Developed Areas: An Input-Output Framework , , Vol.38, No.6, 2004,
118 pp.603-14,.
48 2 1990 pp. 11-52
12 2000 pp. 1-12 ITEC Working Paper Series 06-07 June 2006
2005
33 4 2003 pp. 309-331
Burt, R. S., The Social Capital of Structural Holes , in Mauro F. Guillen, Randall Collins, Paula England and Marshall Meyer eds,
, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2001.
Cool, K. O. and Schendel, D., Performance differences among strategic group
members , , 9(3), 1988, pp. 207-223.
Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A., Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning
and innovation , , Vol. 35, 1990, pp. 128-152.
Granovetter, M., The strength of weak ties, , Vol. 78, 1973, pp. 1360-1380.
Gulati, R., Alliances and networks , , Vol. 19, 1998, pp. 293-317.
Gulati, R. and Gargiulo, M. Where Do Interorganizational Networks Come From , , Vol. 104, No. 5, 1999, pp. 1439-1438.
Helfat, C., Finkelstein, E., Mitchell, S., et al.,
, Blackwell Publishers Limited, 2007.
2010
Kogut, B., The Stability of Joint Ventures: Reciprocity and Competitive Rivalry , Vol.38, 1989, pp.183-198.
Krugman, P. R. , Cambridge Mass.: MIT Press, 1993.
Porter, M. E. ,
119
, 1985
Porter, M. E. , Harvard Business School press,1998. 1999
Sassen, S., , Princeton University Press,
2001.
2008
Uzzi, B., The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic
Performance of Organization , , Vol.61, Issue 4,
1996, pp. 674-698.
Uzzi, B. Social Structure and Competition in Inter-firm Networks: The Paradox of
Embeddedness , , Vol. 42, 1997, pp. 35-67. 2002 2009 (1) 1 5 2002 pp. 355-384 (2) 1 6 2002 pp. 497-520 2002SUM 2002 pp. 69-85 15 2 2009 pp. 39-57 7 2009 pp. 21-42 MINERVA 2005 pp. 131-139 Gulati(1998) No. 3 2003 MINERVA 2005 pp. 29-36 2006
120
Collins, Paula England and Marshall Meyer eds, , New York: Russell Sage Foundatin, 2001.
Gulati, Ranjay, Alliance and Networks , , Vol.19, 1998, pp.293-317.
Hamel, G., Doz, Y., and Praharad, C. K. , Collaborate with Your Competitors and win , , 1989 January-February, 1989, pp133-139.
Kodama, Toshihiro, The role of intermediation and absorptive capacity in facilitating university-industry linkages An empirical study of TAMA in Japan ,
, 37, 2008, pp. 1224 - 1240.
Kogut, B., The Stability of Joint Ventures: Reciprocity and Competitive Rivalry , Vol.38, 1989, pp.183-198.
Kogut, B., The Network as Knowledge: Generative Rules and the Emergence of
Structure , , Vol.21, 2000, pp405-425.
Porter, M. E., Toward a Dynamic Theory of Strategy , , vol. 12 (Winter Special Issue), 1991, pp95-117.
Smith, J. O. and Walter W. Powell, Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Spillovers in the Boston Biotechnology Community ,
, Vol.15, 2004, pp. 5-21.
Uzzi, B., The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic
Performance of Organization , , Vol.61, Issue 4,
1996, pp. 674-698. 2003 1997 ( ) 2006 TAMA RIETI 05-J-026 2006 2006 (1) 2002 pp355-384 (2) 2002 pp497-520
121 2005WIN. 2005 pp182-195 2006 2006 1990 2002SUM. 2002 pp. 69-85 2003 2005 90 54 6 2003 pp. 23-31 Gulati(1998) - No.3 2003 2005 2004 2009 2003 1 2005 pp. 99-119 67 2006 pp. 35-51 33 1 2010 pp. 57-66 36 2008 pp. 73-91
Elmore, Richard F., Backward Mapping: Implementation Research and Policy Decisions, , 94(4), 1979, pp. 601-616.
122 1999 2010 2006 2003 33 1 2010 pp. 57-66 29 2 2006 pp. 47-56 2004 90 54 6 2003 pp. 23-31 32 2 2009 pp. 81-88
Dudley, Geoffrey and Jeremy Richardson, Promiscuous and celibate ministerial styles: policy change, policy networks and British road policy ,
, Vol. 49, 1996, pp. 566 583.
Heclo, Hugh, ; Yale University Press,
1974.
Kodama, Toshihiro, The role of intermediation and absorptive capacity in facilitating university-industry linkages An empirical study of TAMA in Japan ,
, 37, 2008, pp. 1224 - 1240. 2009 2010 10 2012 pp. 1-16 ESRI Discussion Paper Series No. 186, 2007
123 4 2008 pp. 67-84 2007 2008 NPO 9 1 2007 pp. 37-50 2009 pp. 1-30 IT IT 2007 8 3 2006 ASTEM 20 2008 2 1 2005 2008 2008 1996 2005 86 2007 pp. 143-172 96 20011 pp. 31-42
Nakajima, Kentaro, Yukiko Saito, Ichiro Uesugi, Measuring Economic Localization:
Evidence from Japanese firm-level data , , Vol.
10-E-030, 2010. 07-04 2007 2011 pp. 199 210 IT 6 2005 pp. 509-71 22 2011
124 NTT 2011 pp. 211 237 2004 7 2004 pp. 44-53 4 53 3 2005 pp. 182-195 Small-world Networks
RIETI Discussion Paper Series 06-J-055 2006 48 4 2009 pp. 18-22 48 6 2009 pp. 37-43 2012 IT No. 39 2011 Vol. 5, No. 1 2008 pp. 27-51 2003 2008 6 2008 4 11 2005 pp. 579-588 18 2006 Gulati(1998) - No.3 2003 32 2 2009 pp. 55-62 IS 2009-IS-108 3 2009 pp. 1-6 16 2006 pp. 68-79
