Issue Date 2018-10-27
Type Conference Paper
Text version publisher
URL http://hdl.handle.net/10119/15643
Rights
本著作物は研究・イノベーション学会の許可のもとに 掲載するものです。This material is posted here with permission of the Japan Society for Research Policy and Innovation Management.
(Prahalad & Bettis,1986) ,1992
(Prahalad & Bettis,1986,p.490)
1 ,1992 ,2001 (1992) 1971 82 (2001) 1960 1990 1 (1992) 2C10.pdf
2018 1 8 1964 2007 2017 11 1 50 1971 2 1978 1980 7 1990 10 1991 1 1992 2 2017 4
1993 15 3 1998 1998 1999 1 9 7 8 2 3 10 12 4 2 4 5 2004 33 6 2 60 100 5 50 1937 1979 3 ,pp.54-55,1994 10 24 4 5 4 6 TECH 2006 7 12 https://tech.nikkeibp.co.jp/it/article/COLUMN/20060710/242855/ 2018 9 10 TECH 2006 7 13 https://tech.nikkeibp.co.jp/it/article/COLUMN/20060710/242857/ 2018 9 10
1 9
10 12
Bettis, R. A., & Prahalad, C. K. (1995). The dominant logic: Retrospective and extension. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 5–14.
80 (2017). 80 1937-2017 .
(2008). ? Prahalad and Bettis (1986)
7(7), 535 544.
(1992). 26(2), 64 79.
Prahalad, C. K., & Bettis, R. A. (1986). The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 7, 485–501
(2001).
(pp. 27-64). .