• 検索結果がありません。

REPRESENTATIONS OF MAPPING CLASS GROUPS OBTAINED FROM THE MODULAR INVARIANCE PROPERTY OF CYCLIC GROUP ASSOCIATION SCHEMES

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "REPRESENTATIONS OF MAPPING CLASS GROUPS OBTAINED FROM THE MODULAR INVARIANCE PROPERTY OF CYCLIC GROUP ASSOCIATION SCHEMES"

Copied!
5
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

REPRESENTATIONS OF MAPPING

CLASS GROUPS

OBTAINED FROM THE MODULAR INVARIANCE

PROPERTY OF

CYCLIC GROUP ASSOCIATION SCHEMES

ETSUKO BANNAI

KYUSHU UNIVERSITY

\S 0.

Introduction

The concept of the modular invariance property offusion algebra is very important in

conformal field theory. Since Eiichi Bannai found relations between Bose-Mesner algebras

ofassociationschemes and the fusionalgebras([l]), manypeople started to

pay

attentionto

the modular invariance property ofassociationschemes also. It isknown that the modular

invariance property ofassociation schemes and generalized spin models have

some

kind of

relations([3],[5],[9]) and many examples of generalized spin models

are

constructed using

the modular invariance property of association schemes([2],[4], etc.). It is

also

known that

the spin models give invariants of links (see [10]). In this paper we consider another

use

of the modular invariance property.

T. Kohno constructed topological invariant of3-manifold using the modular invariance

property ofthe truncated representations of $sl(2,C)$ (see [11], [12]). He first constructed

projective linear representations of the mapping class

groups

of Riemann surfaces and

then using Heegaard decompositions of 3-manifolds obtained invariants of 3-manifolds.

Motivated by his work, in this paper

we

construct

some

kind of representations of the

mappingclass

groups

usingthe modularinvariance propertyof associationschemes

on

finite

cyclic

groups.

Usingthe Kohno’stechnique

we can

construct invariantsof 3-manifold ffom

those representations. The invariants

seem

to coincide with the

ones

obtained by Gocho

([8]), however I

am

notreadyto discussin detail right

now so

Ijust givetherepresentations

ofmapping class

groups

only(see Theorem 2 in

\S 4).

\S 1.

Modular invariance property ofassociation schemes

First we introduce the definition of the modular invariance property of association

schemes. Let $X=(X, \{R_{i}\}_{0\leq i\leq d})$ be a self-dualassociation scheme and let $P$ and $Q$bethe

first and second eigenmatrices of$X$respectively (notethat$P=\overline{Q}$). For any$i\in\{0,1, \ldots, d\}$

we define $i’$ by ${}^{t}A_{i}=A_{i}/$, where $A_{i}$ is the adjacency matrix with respect

to

the relation $R_{i}$.

Definition 1 (see [3], [5]) Let $X$ be

a

self-dual associationscheme. We say that $X$has the

modular invariance property ifthereexists a diagonal matrix $T=$diag$(t_{0}, t_{1}, \ldots, t_{d})$ with $t_{0}\neq 0$ which satisfies one of the following mutually equivalent conditions:

(2)

(1) PTQTPT’ $=t_{0}D^{3}I$,

(2) PTQTQT$=t_{0}DP^{2}$,

(3) $(\overline{P}T)^{3}=t_{0}D^{3}I$, (4) $(QT)^{3}=t_{0}D^{3}I$,

(5) $(PU)^{3}=t_{0}^{-1}D^{3}I$,

where $D^{2}=|X|,$ $T’=$ diag$(t_{0},t_{1’}, \ldots , t_{d’})$ and $U=$ diag$(to^{-1}, t_{1}^{-1}, \ldots, t_{d}^{-1})$.

Let $\vee\yen(G_{n})=(G_{n}, \{R_{i}\}_{0\leq i\leq n-1})$ be the association scheme defined on the finite cyclic

group

$G_{n}$ of order $n$. It is known that $\vee t(G_{n})$ is self-dual and the character table (first

eigen matrix) is given by $P=(\zeta^{ij})$ with

a

primitive n-th root of unity. The modular

invariance property of $-\yen(G_{n})$ is completely determined (see [2], [6]).

Theorem l(see [2]) $( \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}PT)^{3}=I$ witli a diagonal matrix $T=$ diag$(\lambda_{0}, \lambda_{1}, \ldots, \lambda_{\tau\iota-1})$ if

and only if the following conditions are satisfied:

$\lambda_{0^{3}}=\sqrt{n}\eta^{u^{2}}/\sum_{\downarrow=0}^{n-1}\eta^{l^{2}}$ ,

$\lambda_{i}=\eta^{i(i+2u)}\lambda_{0}$ for $i\in\{0,1, \ldots , n-1\}$ ,

where $\eta=\zeta^{\frac{n+1}{2}}$ for $n$ odd and $\eta^{2}=\zeta$ for $n$ even and $u\in\{0,1, \ldots, n-1\}$ .

\S 3.

Mapping class

groups

Let $\Sigma_{9}$ be an orientable surface of gcriiis

$g$ and $\mathfrak{H}_{9}$ be $t\}_{1}e$ set of all the orientation

preserving homeomorphisms of $\Sigma_{9}$. The mapping class group $9J\uparrow_{9}$ of $\Sigma_{9}$ is the group

consists of all the isotopy cla,sses in $\mathfrak{H}_{9}$. As for the following fact the reader is referred to

[7]. [11], [13]. It is kiiown tllat$\mathfrak{M}_{9}$ is generated by the isotopy classes $\alpha_{i},$$\beta_{i},$$\delta_{i},$$\epsilon_{i},$ $1\leq i\leq g$,

ofthe Dehn twists about the circles $a_{i},$$b_{i},$$d_{i},$$e_{i},$ $1\leq i\leq g$, respectively as $sIiown$ in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The generating relatioris are given by

1$)$ $\delta_{1}=\epsilon_{1}=\alpha_{1_{i}}\delta_{9}=\epsilon_{9}$,

2$)$ Let $\alpha$ and $\beta$ in $tI\iota e$ generatirig set.

Ifthe corresponding circles do not intersect, $t$}$ierl$

(3)

Ifthe corresponding circles intersect at onepoint, $t$}$lerl$

$\alpha\beta\alpha=\beta\alpha\beta$.

3$)$ If$g=2$, then $(\delta_{2}\beta_{2}\alpha_{2}\beta_{1}\alpha_{1^{2}}\beta_{1}\alpha_{2}\beta_{2}\delta_{2})^{2}=1$ . 4$)$ $(\alpha_{1}\beta_{1}\alpha_{2})^{4}=\epsilon_{2}\delta_{2}$,

5$)$ $b_{2}\delta_{2}b_{1}=\alpha_{1}\alpha_{2}\alpha_{3}\delta_{3}$,

where $b_{1}=(\beta_{2}\alpha_{2}\alpha_{3}\beta_{2})^{-1}\delta_{2}(\beta_{2}\alpha_{2}\alpha_{3}\beta_{2})$ and $b_{2}=(\beta_{1}\alpha_{1}\alpha_{2}\beta_{1})^{-1}b_{1}(\beta_{1}\alpha_{1}\alpha_{2}\beta_{1})$,

6$)$ $\delta_{k+1}=J_{k}\delta_{k-1}J_{k}^{-1},2\leq k\leq g-1$ and $\epsilon k=G_{k}\delta_{k}G_{k}^{-1},1\leq k\leq g$,

where $J_{k}=\beta_{k+1}\alpha_{k+1}(\beta_{k}\delta_{k}\alpha_{k}\beta_{k})\alpha_{k+1}\beta_{k+1}\beta_{k-1}\alpha_{k}(\beta_{k}\delta_{k}\alpha_{k+1}\beta_{k})\alpha_{k}\beta_{k-1}$

and $G_{k}=\beta_{k}\alpha_{k}\cdots\beta_{1}\alpha_{1^{2}}\beta_{1}\cdots\alpha_{k}\beta_{k}$.

\S 4.

Representations of the mapping class

group

Let $V$be avectorspaceover the complex nurriber field $C$ wit$f1$ a basis $\{v_{0}, u_{1_{\dot{\prime}}}\ldots, v_{n-1}\}$.

We define linear isornorphisms $S,$$\Lambda$ and $T_{u},$$0\leq u\leq\uparrow\iota-1$ of $V$ and $W_{u},$$0\leq u\leq n-1$, of

$V\otimes V$ in the following manner:

$S(v_{i})= \frac{1}{\sqrt{n}}\sum_{l=0}^{n-1}\zeta^{il}v\iota$,

$\Lambda(v_{i})=v_{i’}=v_{n-i}$

$T_{u}(v_{i})=\lambda_{0}\eta^{i(i+2u)}$,

$W_{u}(v_{i}\otimes v_{j})=\lambda_{0}^{-1}\eta^{-(i-j)(i-j+2u)}v_{i}\otimes v_{j}$,

for $i,j=0,1,$ $\ldots,$$n-1$, where

$\zeta$ and

$\eta$

are

given in Theoreni 1. Then we }lave

$(ST_{u})^{3}=I$ for any $u\in\{0,\cdot 1, \ldots jn-1\}$.

Now we define the linear isomorphisms $\overline{\alpha_{i)}}\overline{\beta_{i}},$ $\overline{\delta_{i}},$ $\overline{\epsilon_{i}},$ $1\leq i\leq g$, on

$V \bigotimes_{9}\cdots\bigotimes_{\tilde{times}}V$

(4)

following equations:

$\overline{\alpha}_{1}=T_{u}^{-1}\otimes I\otimes\cdots\otimes I\sim$

$g-1$ times

for $x=2,3,$$\ldots,$$g$,

for $x=1,2,$ $\ldots\prime g$,

for $x=1,2,$ $\ldots,$$g$, $($iiote $tI_{1}at\overline{\delta}_{1}=\overline{\alpha}_{1})$,

for $x=2,3,$$\ldots,$$g-1_{\dot{J}}$

$\overline{\epsilon}_{1}=\overline{\delta}_{1}=\overline{\alpha}_{1}$, $\overline{\epsilon}_{9}=\overline{\delta}_{9}$

$K_{x}(v_{i_{1}}\otimes\cdots\otimes v_{i_{x}}\otimes\cdots\otimes v_{i_{9}})=\zeta^{2ui_{x}}v_{i_{1}}\otimes\cdots\otimes v_{i_{x}}\otimes\cdots\otimes v_{i_{9}}$ for $x=1,2,$

$\ldots,$$g$, $P_{x}(v_{i_{1}}\otimes\cdots\otimes v_{i_{x}}\otimes\cdots\otimes v_{i_{9}})=v_{i_{1}}\otimes\cdots\otimes v_{i_{x}-2u}\otimes\cdots\otimes v_{i_{9}}$ for $x=1,2_{i}g$.

We have the following theorem.

Theorem 2 (1) Let $G$ and $\Gamma$ be$tI_{1}e$ groups gerierated by $\{\overline{cx}_{x}, \overline{f}d_{x}, \overline{\delta}_{x}, \overline{\epsilon}_{x}|x=1,\cdot 2, \ldots\dot{}g\}$

and $\{\lambda_{0}id, \overline{\Lambda}, K_{x}, P_{x}| x=1,2, \ldots, g\}$ respectively, where $id$ is $t\}_{1}e$ identity map of

$\sim V\otimes\cdots\otimes V$. Then

$\Gamma$ is a normal subgroup of $G$.

9 times

(2) If we define a map $p$ from $\mathfrak{M}_{9}$ to the

group

$G/\Gamma$ by $\rho(\alpha_{x})=\overline{\alpha}_{x}\Gamma$, $\rho(\beta_{x})=$

$\overline{\beta}_{x}\Gamma$, $\rho(\delta_{x})=\overline{\delta}_{x}\Gamma$, $\rho(\epsilon_{x})=\overline{\epsilon}_{x}\Gamma$ and homomorphically for other elements in $\mathfrak{R}t_{g,}$. then $\rho$

is a well defined group homomorphism.

These representations are neither usual representations of groiips nor proje$(:tive1in\epsilon_{J}^{1}\text{\‘{a}} r$

representations. Actually $\rho$ is a homornorphism from thc mapping class group $\mathfrak{M}_{9}$ orito a

factor

group

of a subgroup in a linear

group

offinite dimension. It would be iiiteresting if

we could find out the relation with the symmplectic

group

$Sp(2g, Z)$.

REFERENCES

[1] E. Bannai, A ssociation schemes and$\int usion$ algeb7as (an $i7ll7^{\cdot}oducl?O7\iota)$, J. of AIgebraic $C^{\backslash }Jornbiriatorics$

2 (1993), 327-344.

[2] E. Bannai and E. Baiinai, Spi71, $rnodel_{9}$ onfinile $cy(,\cdot lic$ g7oups, to $\dot{\prime}\iota ppc\backslash \prime aI^{\cdot}i\mathfrak{s}\iota$ J. of $\Lambda lg\epsilon^{Y}1_{3t}\cdot aic\cdot e_{oIItbi\uparrow la-}^{\tau}$

(5)

[3] E. Bannai and E. Bannai, Generalized spin models and association schemes, Memoirs of Fac: Sci. Kyushu Univ. Ser. A, 47, No. 2 (1993), 397-409.

[4] E. Bannai, E. Bannai, T. Ikuta and K. Kawagoe, Spin models construced from the Harnming

as-sociation schemes, Proceedings of 10-th Algebraic Combinatorics Symposium at G ifu Univ. (1992),

91-106.

[5] E. Bannai , E. Bannai and F. Jaeger, in preparation.

[6] Etsuko Bannai, Modular invariance property and spm models attached to cyclic group association schemes, preprint.

[7] J. S. Birman, Mapping class group ofsurfaces, Contemp. Math. 78 (1988), 13-43.

[8] T. Gocho, The topological invariant of$three-mani \int olds$ based on the $U(l)$ gauge $lh_{CO7}\cdot y$, Proc. JaI)an

Acad. 66A No. 8 (1990), 237-239.

[9] F. Jaeger, Strongly regular graphs and spin modelsfor the Kauffman polynomial, Geom. Dedicata 44

(1992), 23-52.

[10] V. F. R. Jones, On knot invariants related to some statislical mechanical models, Pac. i. Math. 137

(1989), 311-334.

[11] T. Kohno, Topological invariants for 3-manifolds using representations of mapping class groups I, Topology 31 (1992), 203-230.

[12] G.MooreandSeiberg, Classicalandquantamconformal field theory,Comm. Math. Phys. 123 (1989),

177-254.

[13] B. Wajnryb, A simple presentation for the mapping class group ofan orientable surface, lsrael J.

Math. 45 (1983), 157-174.

Departmerlt of M athematics

Faculty of Science, Kyushu University Hakozaki 6 - 10- 1, Higashi-ku

参照

関連したドキュメント

• We constructed the representaion of M 1,1 on the space of the Jacobi diagrams on , and we gave a formula for the calculation of the Casson-Walker invariant of g = 1 open books.

Answering a question of de la Harpe and Bridson in the Kourovka Notebook, we build the explicit embeddings of the additive group of rational numbers Q in a finitely generated group

We give a Dehn–Nielsen type theorem for the homology cobordism group of homol- ogy cylinders by considering its action on the acyclic closure, which was defined by Levine in [12]

Going back to the packing property or more gener- ally to the λ-packing property, it is of interest to answer the following question: Given a graph embedding G and a positive number

Shigeyuki MORITA Casson invariant and structure of the mapping class group.. .) homology cobordism invariants. Shigeyuki MORITA Casson invariant and structure of the mapping

As a consequence we will deduce the rigidity theorem of Farb–Kaimanovich–Masur that mapping class groups don’t contain higher rank lattices as subgroups.. This settles

Theorem 5.1 Let G be a connected regular graph with four distinct eigenvalues. Then G is one of the relations of a 3-class association scheme if and only if any two adjacent

These include the relation between the structure of the mapping class group and invariants of 3–manifolds, the unstable cohomology of the moduli space of curves and Faber’s