• 検索結果がありません。

On the Casson-Walker invariant and a quantum representation of the mapping class group through the LMO invariant for genus one open books Atsushi MOCHIZUKI

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "On the Casson-Walker invariant and a quantum representation of the mapping class group through the LMO invariant for genus one open books Atsushi MOCHIZUKI"

Copied!
34
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

On the Casson-Walker invariant and a quantum representation of the mapping class group through

the LMO invariant for genus one open books

Atsushi MOCHIZUKI

RIMS, Kyoto University. D3 revised on 22th February, 2017

(2)

A table of contents

Introduction

Backgrounds

Motivations

Def (Open book decomp) and Prop (Surgery presentation)

Results Part A

Def (Surgery) and Explanation (Surgery presentation)

Idea of Proof of Thm A

Definitions (Jacobi diag, Kontsevich inv, LMO inv)

Proof of Thm A Part B

Definitions (Kirby moves, Space of Jacobi diags, Product)

Construction of Representation

Proof of Thm B

2 / 34

(3)

Backgrounds

Casson-Walker invλ(M)Q

for aZ::::HSM (Casson, 1980s) H(M;Z)=H(S3;Z)

for aQ::::HSM (Walker, 1992) H(M;Q)=H(S3;Q)

Construction in terms of mapping class groups with regard toHeegaard splittings

Morita (1980s)

Cheptea, Habiro, Massuyeau (2008) etc.

⇝How about the case of open book decompositions

(4)

Motivation A

g= 1 Heegaard splitting lens spacesL(p, q)

λ(L(p, q)) =−1 2s(q, p) (s(q, p) : Dedekind sum)

g= 1open book decomposition g= 1open books Mφ

(φ: homeo ofΣ1,1)

λ(Mφ) =?

Aim A

Calculate the Casson-Walker invariant for 3-manifolds admitting a genus one open book decomposition.

4 / 34

(5)

Motivation B

quantum inv. of links

quantum rep. of a braid group ψn:BnEnd(Vn)

quantum inv. of 3-manifolds quantum rep. of a mapping class group

ρ:M1,1 End( ˆA( ))

· · ·

· · ·

· · ·

σ

σ∈Bn,L= ˆσ Jones poly.

trace(hn·ψn(σ))

T

T M1,1,M =S3ˆ

T

Casson inv.

?

Aim B

Construct the representation of the mapping class group MCG(Σ1,1) and present the Casson-Walker invariant ofg= 1 open books

(6)

Open book decompositions

Anopen book decompositions (genus 1, 1 boundary comp) of a 3-manifoldM

M = Σ1,1×[0,1] ϕ

D2×S1

whereφ: a homeo ofΣ1,1 s.t. φ|∂Σ1,1 = id∂Σ1,1

6 / 34

(7)

Surgery presentation

Fact : A 3-mfd with genus one open book decomp has the following surgery presentation.

Ln1,···,nN;m

nN

n3

n2 n1

nN−1

mhalf twists

half twist

S3 M

n1,···,nN;m surgery alongLn1,···,nN;m

(8)

Result A

Mn1,···,nN;m : 3-mfd with genus one open book decomp obtained by surgery along a linkLn1,···,nN;m Suppose thatMn1,···,nN;m is a QHS,

Theorem A [M.]

λ(Mn1,···,nN;m) = 1 24(∑

i

ni3σ)

(−1)m+σ+ 24|H1| (2∑

i

ni+ 6N12m) whereσ : signature of linking matrix ofLn1,···,nN;m

σ+: posi. eigenvalues of linking mat.

|H1|: order ofH1(Mn1,···,nN;m;Z)

8 / 34

(9)

Result B

Mφ : 3-mfd with genus one open book decomp which monodromy is φ

Suppose thatMφ is a QHS

˜

φ∈M]1,1 =T2/KI, KII, KIII ρ:M]1,1End( ˆA( )) Theorem B [M.]

The Casson-Walker invariant ofMφ can be calculated as follows.

λ(Mφ) = 2

tr0(ρ( ˜φ))tr1(ρ( ˜φ)) +1 8σ( ˜φ)

whereσ( ˜φ) : signature of linking matrix ofLφ˜

tri(ρ( ˜φ)) =degree ipart of “quantum trace” of ρ( ˜φ)

(10)

A table of contents

Introduction

Backgrounds

Motivations

Def (Open book decomp) and Prop (Surgery presentation)

Results Part A

Def (Surgery) and Explanation (Surgery presentation)

Idea of Proof of Thm A

Definitions (Jacobi diag, Kontsevich inv, LMO inv)

Proof of Thm A Part B

Definitions (Kirby moves, Space of Jacobi diags, Product)

Construction of Representation

Proof of Thm B

10 / 34

(11)

Surgery

S3 M

the surgery alongL S3

L

pull out the tubular nbd ofL

ψ

D2×S1

M = (S3\the nbd ofL)∪ψ (D2×S1)

(12)

Surgery presentations and monodromies

α β

α

β

12 / 34

(13)

Idea of Proof of Thm A

λ(M)=

deg=1 LMO inv Z1LMO(M)

Kontsevich inv of L Z(L)

ι

Caluculate

glue them

Z

Z(L

n1,···,nN;m) ZLMO

1 (M

n1,···,nN;m)

ι

(14)

Jacobi diagrams

AJacobi diag on a 1-manifoldX

degof a Jacobi diag = 12 #vertices

A(X) = spanC {Jacobi diags onX}/AS, IHX, STU rel

AS : = -

IHX : = -

STU : = -

14 / 34

(15)

Kontsevich invariant

TheKontsevich invis an inv of a link L

Z(L) =Z(T1)◦Z(T2)◦ · · · ◦Z(Tk)∈ A(⊔S1) (Ti : elementary q-tangle)

For example,

Z( ) = Φ = + 1

24[ , ] +· · ·

Z( ) =ν12 =



S2Φ )



12

Z( ) = exp 2 = +1

2 +1

8 + 1

48 +· · ·

(16)

deg=1 part of LMO invariant

Thedeg=1 part of LMO inv Z1LM O(M) = ι(Z(L))

ι(Z( ))σ+ι(Z( ))σ spanC{∅, } ι:A(S1)spanC{∅, }

where

ι : 7−→

7−→ 1 2 7−→ 1

6 + 1

6

=2

16 / 34

(17)

The value of the deg=1 LMO invariant of g = 1 open books

Mn1,···,nN;m : 3-mfd with genus one open book decomp obtained by surgery along a linkLn1,···,nN;m AN : linking matrix ofLn1,···,nN;m

SupposedetAN ̸= 0

Z1LMO(M) =c0(M) +c1(M)θ Prop

c1(Mn1,···,nN;m) = 1

48(1)N+σ+detAN(trAN 3σ)

1

48(1)m+N+σ+(2trAN+ 6N 12m)

(18)

The value of a clasp

Z( ) =

ν12

ν12

S1Φ

S1S32Φ

S2exp

S1S3Φ

= exp 1

24 + 1

96 + 1

96 (Ohtsuki, 2007)

where exp = +1

2 +1

8 + 1

48 +· · ·

18 / 34

(19)

Result A

Mn1,···,nN;m : 3-mfd with genus one open book decomp obtained by surgery along a linkLn1,···,nN;m Suppose thatMn1,···,nN;m is a QHS,

Theorem A [M.]

λ(Mn1,···,nN;m) = 1 24(∑

i

ni3σ)

(−1)m+σ+ 24|H1| (2∑

i

ni+ 6N12m) whereσ : signature of linking matrix ofLn1,···,nN;m

σ+: posi. eigenvalues of linking mat.

|H1|: order ofH1(Mn1,···,nN;m;Z)

(20)

Proof of Thm A

Fact : λ(M) = 2c1(M)

|H1| when b1(M) = 0 Jacobi diags which become throughι

, , , , , ,

, ,

As for non circular case, it can be calculated as LMO inv of lens spaces.

As for circular case, we have only to claculate above three diags. 2

20 / 34

(21)

The value of twist knots 1

n

m Kn;m

Mn;m=SK3

n;m, |H1(Mn;m)|=|n+ (1)m2|

c1(SK3n,m) =











(1)σ+(1

48(n+ 2)(n3σ) + 481(2n+ 6 + 12m)) m : even (−1)σ+(1

48(n2)(n3σ) 481(2n+ 6 + 12m)) m : odd

λ(Mn;m) =

{241 ((n+2)1)((n+2)n+2 2) 2(n+2)m (m:even, n+ 2>0)

241 ((n2)1)((nn2 2)2) 2(nm+12) (m:odd, n2>0)

(22)

The value of twist knots 2

λ(Mn;m) =

{241 ((n+2)1)((n+2)n+2 2) 2(n+2)m (m:even, n+ 2>0)

241 ((n2)1)((nn2 2)2) 2(nm+12) (m:odd, n2>0)

λ(SK3) =λ(S3) + 1

2p∆′′K(1)−s(1, p)

=−s(1, p) + 1

2p∆′′K(1) s(1, p) = (p1)(p2)

12p

′′Kn,m(1) =

{−m m : even m+ 1 m : odd

22 / 34

(23)

A table of contents

Introduction

Backgrounds

Motivations

Def (Open book decomp) and Prop (Surgery presentation)

Results Part A

Def (Surgery) and Explanation (Surgery presentation)

Idea of Proof of Thm A

Definitions (Jacobi diag, Kontsevich inv, LMO inv)

Proof of Thm A Part B

Definitions (Kirby moves, Space of Jacobi diags, Product)

Construction of Representation

Proof of Thm B

(24)

Kirby moves

the KI move : ←→ ∅ ←→

the KII move : −→

the KIII move :

0

−→ ∅

theKI move : ←→ ∅

24 / 34

(25)

The space of the Jacobi diagrams on 2-tangles

Aˆ( ) ={Jacobi diagrams on 2-tangles up to AS, IHX, STU}/P2, O1, I>2

P2 : + + 0

O1 : ∼ −2

I>2 : the Jacobi diagram whose trivalent vertices >20 We set 10 elements as the basis ofA( ).

µ00= ,µ1 = ,µ10= ,µ01= ,µ11= , θµ00= ,θµ1 = ,θµ10= , θµ01= ,θµ11=

(26)

The product on the space of the Jacobi diagrams

The product on the spaceA( )

: ˆA( )⊗A(ˆ ) A(Sˆ 1 )ˆι A(ˆ )

For diagramsη= D ,η= D ∈ A( ),

η•η= ˆι





D

D





∈A(ˆ ),

26 / 34

(27)

Construction of Representation

ρ:M]1,1=T2/KI, KII, KIIIˆιZˇ Aˆ( )π End( ˆA( )) ˆ

ι:=

−1ι: ˆA((⊔S1) )→A(ˆ ) ˆιZˇ is invariat under the KI, KII, KIII moves.

: ˆA( )⊗Aˆ( ) (

D , D )

7→ˆι



D D

∈Aˆ( )

π: ˆA( )End( ˆA( )) π(

ˆ ιZ(R)ˇ )

: ˆA( )→A(ˆ ) ˆ

ιZˇ(T)7→ˆιZˇ(R◦T) = ˆιZ(R)ˇ ˆιZ(R)ˇ

(28)

Result B

Mφ : 3-mfd with genus one open book decomp which monodromy is φ

Suppose thatMφ is a QHS

˜

φ∈M]1,1 =T2/KI, KII, KIII ρ:M]1,1End( ˆA( )) Theorem B [M.]

The Casson-Walker invariant ofMφ can be calculated as follows.

λ(Mφ) = 2

tv0ρ( ˜φ)w

tv1ρ( ˜φ)w+1 8σ( ˜φ) whereσ( ˜φ) : signature of linking matrix ofLφ˜ vi =degree ipart oft

(

tr ,tr ,tr ,tr ,tr ,· · ·) w= ˆιZ(ˇ )∈Aˆ( )

28 / 34

(29)

Proof of Thm B

It is known that

Z1LMO(M) =c0(M) +c1(M)θ, λ(M) = 2

c0(M)c1(M), Z1LMO(M) =

(

−1 + 1 16θ

)σ+( 1 + 1

16θ )σ

ιZ(L)ˇ

=(1)σ+ (

1 + 1 16σθ

)

(b0+b1θ)

=(1)σ+b0+ (1)σ+ (σ

16b0+b1 )

θ.

On the other hand, we have that

(trµ00,trµ1,trµ10,· · ·)ρ( ˜φ)ˆιZ(ˇ ) = ˆιZ(Lˇ φ˜).

2

(30)

Concrete Calculations

When the monodromyφis periodic in M1,1, we can set

˜

φ=hmαn1β· · ·αnNβ, ∀i, ni 0, ∃j, nj ̸= 0,

whereh= ,α=

+1 ,β = +1 ,

andσ( ˜φ) = 0.

ρ(h),ρ(α),ρ(β) can be presented as matrices inGL10(C).

v=t(0, 2, 2, 2, 1

6θ, 0, 2θ, 2θ, 2θ, 0) w=t(0, 1, 1

2, 1 2, 0, 1

24, 0, 0, 0, 0) Thus, the Casson-Walker invaritant ofMφ is

λ(Mφ) = 2

tv0ρ( ˜φ)w

tv1ρ( ˜φ)w

30 / 34

(31)

Presentation of the generators

α= 1

24θµ00+ (

1 + 1 24

) µ1+1

2µ10+1

2µ01+1 4

( 1 1

3θ )

µ11

β= (

1 + 1 16θ

)

µ00−µ1+1

2(1 1

48θ)µ10+1

2(1 1

48θ)µ01 1 96θµ11

V =V1⊕V2⊕V3

=C⟨µ00, µ10, θµ00, θµ10⟩ ⊕C⟨µ01, µ11, θµ01, θµ11⟩ ⊕C⟨µ1, θµ1

(32)

Concrete matrix presentaion of α

A:=ρ(

+1

) is the following matrix.









1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

1

2 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 241 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0

1

96 0 241 0 0 12 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 961 241 0 0 0 12 1









=

( 1 0 0 0

1

2 1 0 0

0 0 1 0

961 241 12 1

)

( 1 0 0 0

1

2 1 0 0

0 0 1 0

961 241 12 1

)

( 1 0

241 1

)

32 / 34

(33)

Concrete matrix presentaion of β

B:=ρ( +1 ) is the following matrix.









1 0 −2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0

481 0 241 0 0 1 02 0 0 0 241 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 481 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 481

1

24 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 481 0 0 0 0 1









=

( 1 2 0 0

0 1 0 0

481 241 12 0 481 0 1

)

( 1 2 0 0

0 1 0 0

481 241 12 0 481 0 1

)

( 1 0

241 1

)

(34)

Summary and Future directions

Summary

We calculated the Casson-Walker invariant ofg= 1 open books through the calculation of the deg=1 part of the LMO invariant.

We constructed the representaion of M1,1 on the space of the Jacobi diagrams on , and we gave a formula for the calculation of the Casson-Walker invariant of g= 1 open books.

Future directions

relation to rep. theory of MCG

relation to contact topology

general cases

34 / 34

参照

関連したドキュメント

It is suggested by our method that most of the quadratic algebras for all St¨ ackel equivalence classes of 3D second order quantum superintegrable systems on conformally flat

As explained above, the main step is to reduce the problem of estimating the prob- ability of δ − layers to estimating the probability of wasted δ − excursions. It is easy to see

To obtain the asymptotic expansion, as mentioned in Section 2.2, we rewrite the sum (14) of ⟨ 5 2 ⟩ N by using an integral by the Poisson summation formula (Proposition 4.6)

Answering a question of de la Harpe and Bridson in the Kourovka Notebook, we build the explicit embeddings of the additive group of rational numbers Q in a finitely generated group

In my earlier paper [H07] and in my talk at the workshop on “Arithmetic Algebraic Geometry” at RIMS in September 2006, we made explicit a conjec- tural formula of the L -invariant

We give a Dehn–Nielsen type theorem for the homology cobordism group of homol- ogy cylinders by considering its action on the acyclic closure, which was defined by Levine in [12]

Shigeyuki MORITA Casson invariant and structure of the mapping class group.. .) homology cobordism invariants. Shigeyuki MORITA Casson invariant and structure of the mapping

We study the classical invariant theory of the B´ ezoutiant R(A, B) of a pair of binary forms A, B.. We also describe a ‘generic reduc- tion formula’ which recovers B from R(A, B)