under anaerobic conditions
(OD660
‑1.0),
whereas the extracellular catalase activity less than 0.4%.(53,
56, 57,85)
We investigated the effect of KatE on the short‑term H202 tolerance of B. longum
105‑A. The survival rates ofB. longum 105‑A
bBCATOO1, pKKT427)
were detehminedby incubating cultures for 1 h in MRS medium with 4.4 mM H202 at 37oC. The survival
/
rates of B. longum 105‑A
bBCATOO1)
during the exponential and stationary phaseswere significantly increased by 120‑ and 103‑fold, respectively, compared to that ofB.
longum 105‑A
(pKKT427).
The data in Table 1 illustrate that exponential‑phase cellswere more sensitive to H202 than stationary‑phase cells.
(50)
We also investigated the physiology ofB. longum 1 05‑A under aerobic conditions. B.
longum 105‑A
bKKT427)
reached a maximum growth rate at 12 h aRer inoculation under anaerobic conditions. The growth ofB. longum 1 05‑A(pBCATOO1)
was partially inhibited and B. longum 105‑AbRT427)
was nearly stopped under aerobic culture conditions(Fig. 14).
To measure growth rates, cells were cultured and thenplate‑counted. Although most of the B. longum 1 05‑A
bKKT427)
specimens survived 12 h of aerobic culture, cell growth began to sharply decrease and became almostunculturable aRer 24 h in aerobic culture. However, B. longum 105‑A
bBCATOO1)
exhibited high survival
(1x107
colony‑forming units(CFU)/mL)
at 24 h and only became unculturable after 48 h in aerobic conditions(Fig.15).
The presence of KatE protected B. longum 1 05‑A from aerobic culture‑induced death.The concomitant generation of H202 Was also measured
(Fig.17).
The accumulation of H202 in B. longum 105‑A(pKKT427)
increased for 18 h and peaked at 0.1 mM.H202 Was scavenged by the genetically expressed catalase during the exponential phase,
and it did not begin to accumulate in the medium ofB. longum 105‑A
bBCATO'01)
until the stationary phase. At this time, the cells became unculturable(Fig.
15).
Interestingly, the decrease in the growth of B. longum 105‑AbKKT427)
was faster than that of B.longum 105‑A
bBCATOO1). This
might be because the concentration of H202 in B.longum 105‑A
bBRT427)
was 2‑fold higher than that ofB. longum 105‑AbBCATOO1)
in aerated cultures. B. longum 105‑A
bBCATOO1)
survived longer due to the increased period of time in which H202 had not accumulated. This difference in growth suggests that H202 Was Primarily responsible for B. longum 105‑A becoming unculturable underaerobic conditions.
Lahtinen et al. reported that B. longum lost culturability quickly during storage, but
the cells still maintained intact membranes
(47).
H202 is known to damage DNA and protein; however, it is unknown whether H202 Can easily damage the B. longummembrane. Therefore, we investigated whether it was possible that B. longum 105‑A lost their culturability but maintained an intact membrane. These experiments were
conducted using the LIVE/DEAD
BacLight
bacterialviability
kit(L/D; hviLfr.gen).
After 24 h in aerobic culture, B. longum 105‑A containing pKKT427 remained
relatively stable, and lx107 'viable' cells/mL were maintained
(Fig. 16);
however, thesurvival decreased to lx101‑2
cFu/mL (Fig.15).
Based on this information, we wereonly able to make the decision that the cells had intact membranes, but it is still
unknown whether the cells were dead. To conf1rm Whether cells maintain viability, further studies are needed, such as examining the synthesis ofDNA, RNA, and protein.
Some studies reported that adding exogenous catalase to the liquid medium improved
aerobic growth of bifidobacteria. Because H202 readily difhses across cell membranes but exogenously added catalase cannot penetrate cell membranes, we therefore
compared the culturable B. longum 105‑A protected by catalase expression with the culturable B. longum 1 05‑A protected by the addition of exogenous catalase. Although
the counts of B. longum 105‑A
bKKT427)
recovered when cultured under aerobicconditions with exogenously added catalase from bovine liver
(100
and 3000 U/mL medium, C1345‑1G,SIGMA),
the counts ofB. longum 105‑AbKKT427)
were similarregardless of concentration of added catalase. Interestingly, the counts of B. longum 105‑A protected by addition of exogenous catalase were nearly identical those of to B.
longum
105‑A bBCATO61)
when ae,.bically cultured f.r 18 h, alth.ugh the concentrations of exogenously added catalase were much higher than the levels of expressed catalase. B. longum 105‑A that was protected by exogenously added catalasewas unculturable aRer 36 h in aerated culture; however, B. longum 105‑A
bBCATOO1)
did not become unculturable until 48 h in aerated culture. These results indicate that B.
longum maintained intact cell membranes whereas induced exogenously added catalase
eliminated extracellular H202 but was unable to eliminate intracellular H202.
H202 Was a Primary factor in
Bljidobacterium
becoming unculturable under aerobic conditions; the addition of exogenous catalase or the genetic expression of catalasecould
protectBljidobacterium
from oxidative stress. This effect was weaker for exogenous catalase than for heterologously expressed catalase. Further studies areneeded to find a promoter that can induce higher and prolonged expression of catalase that will allow for complete scavenging of H202 and improve viability under aerobic
conditions.
4.2 Improvement of catalase expression level
Although expression of catalase could protect
Bljidobacterium
from oxidative stress, the expression level was still low. To improve the expression level, we tried to improve the transcription and translation of catalase level.4.2. 1 Transcription
It is difrlCult to obtain high levels of expression of foreign genes in
Bljidobacterium,
some shuttle vectors have been reported. The promoters of the gap, a‑galactosidase, lacl family transcriptional regulator, 1 6s rRNA, and hup genes from
Bljidobacterium
havebeen used to express foreign genes in B. longum and B. breve. In this study, the B.
subtilis catalase gene could not be expressed under the control of its native promoter. To obtain high catalase activity in
Bljidobacterium,
a strong, organism‑specific promoterwas needed. The gap and hup genes have high codon adaptation indices
(CAIs)
in B.longum, 0.742 and 0.629, respectively, and both are highly expressed in
Bljidobacterium.
Homology searches were performed for the upstream regions of gap and hup in B.
adolescentis ATCC15703, B. animalis lactis ADOll, B.
bljidum
PRL2010, B. dentiumBd1, and B. longumNCC2705
(Fig.18).
The gap and hup upstream regions have ahighly conserved putative ribosome binding site
(RBS).
By comparison to the typical‑35 and ‑10 promoter consensus sequences of TTGACA and TATAAT, TTGGCN and TANTAT were possible candidate for the hup gene ‑35 and ‑10 sequences, respectively.
For the gap gene, the promoter ‑10 sequence, TACAGT, was conserved in all strains.
H.wever, TTGCCC
was
the putative p,.m.te, ‑35 sequence in allPljidobacte,ium
strains except B. animalis lactis ADOll, whose putative prorpoter ‑35 sequence was TTGAAG. In addition, the distance between the putative ‑35 with ‑10 regions of the hup promoters in five
Bljidobacteria
strains and the gap promoter in B. animalis lactiswere shorter than the typical distance; however, the distance between them in the gap promoters in B. adolescentis, B.
bljidum,
B. dentium, and B. longum was 1 8 nucleotides.Since little is known about the po1ymerase in
Bljidobacteria
compared to those of other bacteria, further experiments will be required to understand the upstream regions ofthese genes
(28,
29, 30, 33, 48, 52, 59, 75, 80,81).
The results of quantitative RT‑PCR for catalase transcript in B. longum 105‑A
bBCATOOl
andpBCATOO2)
are shown on flg. 19. The quantity of catalase transcriptwas close to each other under the control of hup and gap promoter either at the
exponential phase or stationary phase, and the catalase activityalso was close
(1.
1 8‑fold,hup promoter vs. gap promoter, Fig.
13).
A
a.dqllium Bdl a.adolescenLis A 7CC 75703 8Jorgum NCC2705
LLbiGdum PRL20 10 a.admalis lacEls JWO1 1
CqlSOnSUS
a̲dLZnILum Bdl a̲i)doltrsconLLs A71CC15703
8Jorgum NC C2705 a̲bill‑dun PRL20 10 a.admaJjs lac(Is ADO1 1
・1ql I
ITIAe
::I.::
rIII ILll 1LIII LLLll
TPrT CRT
TTT TTT
II(AArtIITC:C
*c TT rrT
AT
AA
;r!!‑i
TIAAAcAcACGllLIJceI7AcAAC AAC Ace QdG ANNACNCCNTTTTT6C ‑CNAAACACGCG‑CCNCGNAAC
‑10
CQC CC;C
GGC C6C CCG
a.dqlLEum Bdl a.adoLEFSCeI7Lis A 7CC 75703 BJotvum NCC2705
a. bJlidum PFIL2010 a,8nlnL?Illslacds ADO1 7
Ccnsensus
B
a.adolEZSCOhuS A TCC 7 5703
a.dmlium Bd1
8Jongum NCC2705 a.bJGhTr7 Pt?L2010 By8dm3IJs lacLLS ADO1 1
CmsbnSUB
a̲adolDSLHnLLls A TCC15703
&dentlum 8d7 BJorqum NCC2705
a.bd7dtln7 PRL2010 a̲brrmalJs lacrjs ADO7 7
Cmscnsus
a.edoloscEInL(s A TCC75703 a.denEium Bd1
8Jolgum NCC2705
8.bindum Pfa2010 8.&lVrmaJJs lacLEs ADO7 1
TARAQ TA#AG TA8AG TACAG
TAgAA
TACAG
・20l
BGgCPACCCTA AGE?C#Al= CCTA AGICF]Al=CCTAI
#GPCPIACCCTAJ B6gC&TCCCC
It>AACACQCG IAAACE}CACG L^AdCAAd[CG LTTE:QOC4CG
IILCl5l IIJTQ IbLOA JILcd
‑35
‑loo
TTGCe TGCt TGCC TGCT
TGAA
TGCC
#5GTAC:ACT)GJ 54
Ef:;2:::!i;I
5545gLt81'ACA6L1@b s4 P?ABCAA.L)qll 55
;::: ::;::::::T,::E::S::I:E2:E:::!Gi:::::::
T6TT66TAAACAATR66C IC&IT6TT6GTAAACAA4GGC
111 111 110 110
GIcAJTGTTGGTTAACC^ALT;CCII ‑^GCAI(;TGI)AICCATCCGI 1{1
GNCANTGT TGGTAAACAATGGCNTCAGTGN6CCNNANGCACGCGN
FIBS
AGGGA AG6GA
A6G6A AG G6A AG6GA
TilTA WTA WTA Fq‑A
F=TA TTA
‑120I
138 13$
138 138 134
:ttl I
cTTAtAAAATQaCA
cT TAIAGA^TQE:qQ
c TTi(A AAA EW.e@GIa]
CTTL Tt)
A^A^TGCQQ
AAAC&Cbgo
T TNAACCCCCNTNNNNGNAANAAANT6NGCGAAAACCCTTATAAAATGC6GGT
‑10
LggALcLTGAG
‑GAANCNTGC6
RBS ACW
ACG ACB ATl;
AC..
AGAAG A6AAG AGAAG AGAAG AGAAG A6AAG
ALVA AITA All7fA AICA AIBA
ATdTA
Tt
;;
;i
‑6D JW
L 1
cT1^TGA^CgT4qIA11TTdllL:; LAAqeIQL4TSyCCCCTG 1 16
;iT̲iATr.^ACGTQGACiTCii
LTTI^TGAACACCE)qgLATIll
EIAAVCIOLATQTccccTG
IAAAE)IG)1‑T4QccccTG 11t5116 JdAAQ]gIAIA‑@gCCCC?6 116 llTltTTGAACATMQqTAIMBIAATQIQIATT<CCCCTG 117
NTTNATGAACAT6G6GNTTNNGGNAATCNGNATGTCCCCTG
1
137 137 137 137 138
Fig. 1 8. Alignment of the upstream sequences of gap
(A)
and hup(B)
genes. The start codon, proposed RBS, ‑35 and ‑10 siteswere blocked.0 U) a
‑a
〜 a
O
I+
0 JJ>
'j=
E a=
O
4)
>
i;
‑q}
EE
0
Exponential‑phase Stationary‑phase
Fig. 19. Relative quantity
(RQ)
of catalase transcripts in B. longum 105‑AbKKT427‑HkatE
orpKKT427‑GkatE)
at exponential‑phase(OD660
0f‑0.6)
andstationary‑phase
(OD660
0f‑1.0).
Data were normalized to the chromosomal gap gene and analyzed by the 2‑AACT method. Values represent the fold change compared with B.longum 105‑A
bKKT427‑HkatE).
The quantity of catalase transcript in B. longum 105‑AQ)KKT427‑GkatE)
was 1.058‑fold than the B. longum 105‑AbKKT427‑HkatE)
at exponential‑phase, and the quantity of catalase transcript in B. longum 105‑A
bKKT427‑llkatE)
was 1.047‑fold than the B. longum 105‑Ab)KKT427‑GkatE)
atstationary‑phase. Empty bar: B. longum 105‑A
bKKT427‑HkatE);
solid bar: B. longum 1 05‑AbKKT427‑GkatE).
Error bars correspond to the standard errors of the means,4.2.2 Translation
In prokaryotes, the promoter consists of2 short sequences atthe ‑10 and ‑35 positions
upstream &om the transcription start site. The length ofa RBS varies from 3 to 9 nt, and the distance
bet&een
the RBS and the initiation codon ranges from 5 to 13 nt.considering the promoter size, and the length of the RBS and spacer, we investigated the upstream areas of the 1,243 genes in which the interspaces of the coding region are longer than 50 nt in B. longum NCC2705, which carries 1,727 hypothetical genes. We
counted the A, T, G, C &equency
(Fig.20).
The A + G contents are very high in 18 nt upstream of the initiation codon. We then counted the frequently appearing sequences 5 nt, 6 nt and 7nt frompositions
‑1 to ‑18(Fig.21).
Almost all high &equency sequencegwere complemented to the 3'‑end of B. longum 16S rRNA. AAGGAG showed the highest 6 nt frequency which was 2.8‑fold compared to AGGAGG. We designed various RBSs with lengths from 5 nt to ll nt, and with a 6 nt spacer, according to the B. longum 16S rRNA 3'‑end
(5'‑...CACCUCCUUUCU ‑3');
AAGGAG was used as a coresequence
(Fig.22).
These sequences were introduced into expression vectors and we assayed their catalase activities.Quantitative
analysis of catalase activity was measured by the decrease of opticaldensity
at 240 nm as described. The strain had the greatest activity when the RBS was AAGGAG(6nt)
which matched the statistical data(Fig.23).
When the RBS was longer than 6 nt, the activity decreased in B. longum. This might be because the ribosome bound to mRNA so tightly that disturbed releasing the ribosome to start the translation. We also counted the 6 nt nucleotides with upstream fi.equencies
with the same manual in other
Bljidobacteria
species, including B. adolescentis ATCC15703, B.bljidum
PRL2010 and B. animalis subsp. lactis ADOll. AAGGAG wasthe most common 6 nt nucleotide in all of the strains. These results indicated that
AAGGAG was the canonical RBS in
Blf2iobacteria. (7,
12, 16, 17, 31, 58, 62, 82,83)
600
>
O
=q)
400
=
a 300
L
LL
200
‑27 ‑24 ‑21 ‑18 ‑15 ‑12 ‑9 ‑6 ‑3 0 Position
Fig. 20. The A, T, G, C &equency in the upstream areas of the genes with interspaces
of the coding region longer than 50 nt in B. longum NCC2705.