非構造化P2Pネットワークにおける評価偽造の影響低減を目的とした評価集約手法
8
0
0
全文
(2) 2.3 GossipTrust. 2.. P2P GossipTrust. GossipTrust. GossipTrust 2.1 P2P. GossipTrust. power node. power node power node GossipTrust. power node power node power node. i. j. t. rij (t) 2.2. sij (t). 1. rij (t) sij (t) = !n , (0 ≤ sij (t) ≤ 1) j=1 rij (t). i = 1, 2, · · · , n.. sij (t). !n. j=1 sij (t). (1). =1. i. xij. xij (t) = ((1 − α) sij (t) + αspj (t)) × vi (t − 1) spj (t). power node p α t−1. (2). j. power node i. 2. j. 2. t. j. vi (t − 1) i. xij (t) spj (t). power node α. 1. 1.
(3) DIF-Trust (Decreasing the Influence of Forgery) DIF-Trust. power node. DIF-Trust power node power node power node power node. 1 GossipTrust. DIF-Trust. GossipTrust DIF-Trust. • • •. 3.1 power node GossipTrust. 1. 1 power node. GossipTrust power node θij. power node. i. j. power node θij (t) = β × |sij (t) − spj (t)| .. 3. 3. (3). i sij (t). j. power node. j. spj (t). β β( 0 ≤ sij ≤ 1 ). θij. GossipTrust power node. power node power node ψ. power node. spj (t). power node. power node ψ. power node. spj (t) power node power node. 3.. power P2P power node power node. node 2 ψ.
(4) ψ power node. DIF-Trust. ψi (t) = siH (t) − siL (t) siH (t) =. Hnum !. (4). sihk (t)/Hnum. (5). k=1. siL (t) =. Lnum !. silk (t)/Lnum. 2 DIF-Trust. (6). k=1. 4. 3.3. Hnum Lnum. i. power node. sihk (t). hk. silk (t). i. power node. lk siH (t). i siL (t). i power node. i power ψ(t). i. node i. power node. p. t 3.2 rip (t) = rip (t − 1) × η 8. 1. (8) i. rip (t − 1) 2 power node. η(0≤η≤1). DIF-Trust. spj (t) power node power 2. node. 8. 2 power node power node. spj (t) power node. xij (t) = sij (t) × vi (t − 1) 7. (7). i. sij (t) i. vi (t − 1). 4. DIF-Trust.
(5) 1 N. 1000. γ γf : γm 1. 1: 9 F. power node. 100. Np. power node. 5. 0 50. 0.1 α. 5. 0.3. β. 0.5 η. 0.5. ′. rij (t) = 1 − rij (t). 100. (9). ′. 9. rij (t) 3 4 3 n1. n7. n8. n10. power node 4 n1, n2 n7. n8. n10. 3. power node. • • • •. 4. (. ). 4.1 1 1000. P2P 4.2 100 1. 5 100. GossipTrust 5. GossipTrust. 2 power node power node power node.
(6) 5 GossipTrust. 6 GossipTrust. power node. 4.3 6. 7. GossipTrust. 7 DIF-Trust. DIF-Trust 6. 2 4 GossipTrust power node 2. 10. power node. power node power node. 6. DIF-Trust power node. 4 7. 2. 4.4. 3. 8. 9. GossipTrust. Trust 10. DIF8. 9 11 DIF-Trust. power node. 8. DIF-Trust. GossipTrust 3. 20 DIF-Trust power node. 3 power node. 9 power node.
(7) 8. 10. GossipTrust DIF-Trust. DIF-Trust GossipTrust 9. 5. power node. power node. DIF-Trust. power GossipTrust. node DIF-Trust. 9. DIF-Trust. DIF-Trust 80. power node power node GossipTrust. power node power node. DIF-Trust. power node. GossipTrust. 4.5 10. GossipTrust. DIF-Trust 23. 10. DIF-Trust. 80.
(8) [1]. [2]. [3] [4]. [5]. [6]. [7]. [8]. [9]. [10]. J. Erman, A. Mahanti, M. Arlitt, and C. Williamson, “Identifying and discriminating between web and peerto-peer traffic in the network core,” 16th international conference on World Wide Web ACM New York, NY, USA, May 2007. M. Hefeeda and O. Saleh, “Traffic modeling and proportional partial caching for peer-to-peer systems,” IEEE/ACM TON archive Volume 16 Issue 6 2008, Dec 2008. J. Meserve, ”P2P traffic still dominates the Net,” Network World, Aug 2005. N. Christin, A. Weigend, and J. Chuang, ”Content availability, pollution and poisoning in file sharing peer-topeer networks,” ACM Conf. on E-Commerce 2005, Jun 2005. J. Mao, Y. Cui, j. Huang, and J. Zhang, ”Modeling and Analysis of Resource’s Load-Scale in P2P Network,” CMC 2009, Jan 2009. R. Zhou, and K. Hwang, ”PowerTrust: A Robust and Scalable Reputation System for Trusted P2P Computing”, IEEE Trans. on Parallel and Distributed Systems, pp.460-473, April 2007. R. Zhou and K. Hwang, ”Gossip-based reputation aggregation for unstructured peer-to-peer networks,” IEEE International. on Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, Mar 2007. R. Zhou, K. Hwang, and M. Cai, ”GossipTrust for Fast Reputation Aggregation in Peer-to-Peer Networks,” IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering, vol. 20, Issue. 9, pp. 1282-1295, 2008. Yajima, T.; Matsumoto, A.; Shigeno, H., ”PTrust: Provisional Value based trust for reputation aggregation in peer-to-peer networks,” 1st International Symposium on Access Spaces (IEEE-ISAS 2011), pp. 180-185, June 2011. Takeda, S.; Ushikubo, H.; Shigeno, H., ”SPTrust: Reputation Aggregation Method Based on Similarity to Reputation Scores of Power Nodes in Unstructured P2P Networks,” Eighth Inter National Conference on Broadband, Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications (BWCCA2013), October 2013..
(9)
関連したドキュメント
学期 指導計画(学習内容) 小学校との連携 評価の観点 評価基準 主な評価方法 主な判定基準. (おおむね満足できる
環境影響評価の項目及び調査等の手法を選定するに当たっては、条例第 47
第2章 環境影響評価の実施手順等 第1
廃棄物の排出量 A 社会 交通量(工事車両) B [ 評価基準 ]GR ツールにて算出 ( 一部、定性的に評価 )
項目 評価条件 最確条件 評価設定の考え方 運転員等操作時間に与える影響 評価項目パラメータに与える影響. 原子炉初期温度
を基に設定するが,敷地で最大層厚 35cm が確認されていることも踏まえ,堆積量評価結果
敷地からの距離 約82km 火山の形式・タイプ 成層火山. 活動年代