適応関連づけ処理が自由再生に及ぼす効果

全文

(1)ῐ῏῎ῌ῍. The Japanese Journal of Psychonomic Science 2010, Vol. 29, No. 2, 144ῌ151.

(2) . . . . . The e#ect of fitness-relevant processing on recall Yukio M>OJ=6G6 Konan Women’s University῍. Nairne, Thompson, and Pandeirada (2007) demonstrated that processing words according to a grasslands survival scenario leads to better recall than using any other semantic processing. They named this e#ect adaptive memory. The present experiment examined whether fitness-relevant processing conditions, grassland survival processing, or spouse-choice processing, lead to better recall than other semantic processing conditions, using pleasant or self-reference processing. The results indicated that the recall of the participants was best in the grassland survival processing condition and was better in the spouse-choice processing condition than in the self-reference processing condition. Some caution is necessary if the spouse-processing is considered as fitnessrelevant, because there was not a significant di#erence between the self-reference processing condition and the pleasant processing condition. However, these results were discussed in the context of evolved human memory functions. Key words : adaptive memory, survival processing, spouse-choice processing, memory function. . !"#$ %&'()*+,-./. I)7G X 2008> ^ /

(3) X Nairne, Thompson, & Pandeirada. 01$23456789:4;<=>. X 01$23 %&$8

(4) !"7G. ?@ A4B=+C23. DEF487G*. (2007). => 23

(5) =9:&56. HIJKLMN$OP&. _8'(=)*+$y)$9:4U*X. E4QR

(6) STSE9:UVWX 23

(7) YZ. mn& ~ijy23qr4s#^. =T[$\]^WG_8>. t==g)4*78> /. X $. Càb (Craik & Lockhart, 1972; Craik &. $8

(8) =.)*+4 Cd 4. X 2cd $a$e^)*+,. ^t=)X oW/$d $qr$ij!. Tulving, 1975). -./$234bf78> g$b. 2ch$%&. ^W=g)]7X 23 (adaptive memory) )*+. ijkl&X kl&ijmn&o$p. ,-./bf78> /$ 1 9:. $23qr4s#^t=)^WX g$g)4uv=S. ¡J ¢£X {z¤7¢£X ¥¦¥. w$4x*8>. ¢£§^WX ¨Q©ª«$ qr¬. o$pX abyz)y W=23qr4{_. ^W8> ). 9:1. ®¯$°j±^W8)*+. |g)^W8mn&ijX ^/

(9) }*23qr4. $y)o$²³$ $8

(10) ´]d . {_|g)*+ ~$ Rogers,. µW=.¶·=X {z¤7). Kuiper, & Kirker (1977)

(11) izG*^W8 . ¯¸{z¤7¹8Eº»4u=)*+$y. ®. )´]d µW=.¶·=X ¥¦ ῍ Department of Psychology, Faculty of Human Sciences, Konan Women’s University, 6ῌ2ῌ23 Morikita-cho, Higashinada-ku, Kobe 658ῌ0001. ¥). ´]d µW¥=.¶·=. z8> o$¼X ¢£$ qr$ 2 ¢£ij WX g$23

(12)

(13) E4y½g). Copyright 2011. The Japanese Psychonomic Society. All rights reserved..

(14) ¼½ &W# $% !^ . bc/. 145. >--.2>-.k- /.

(15) 2 3 . a*0%- ^>- Nairne et al. (2007)

(16) /a. _/-.

(17) !"# $% &'()

(18) *+ ,-.. /a ` *aV39- bc. 4 . 93 &WKL9kxda... ()*/-.

(19) 01. &23. 9R/.. 5. ,`*. #/-da2>-.*8V3 #/-da<,. 435' (Butler, Kang, & Roediger, 2009;. 9- &WTKL9kx . Kang, McDermott, & Cohen, 2008; Nairne & Pandei-. ` Ip &BT &W# da ez . rada, 2008b; Nairne, Pandeirada, & Thompson, 2008;. ITzda&'2>- p. 269 f. Otgaar, Smeets, & van Bergen, 2010; Weinstein,. = cgf PB>x,`*-./-h. Bugg, & Roediger, 2008) 67. .9B~ .i* /-.

(20) . 839-. *:

(21) Z>- .*?/-Y. Nairne & Pandeirada (2008a)

(22) (). :93

(23) . . *

(24) &W# $% .V3 /a.,`. ;<=; >-9

(25) =;ῌ?@A (. -./a .j/-Y .V3k. )*/-.9BCDEFGHI J .9BK. lm /a.!"# $% /a*0% !"#. L

(26) MN?3O P Q.9BKL. $%

(27) Rogers et al. (1977)

(28) no9.

(29) NRS39T9.UV39- PV3(). P!p. Q!. >2 *o9-i

(30) rs>- . !. &23;V T "#$%. V3O&W'( SX*)%-Y >-

(31) Z. P i. R.V39- :N' () Q

(32) Y . ez(*o9. /T[\ Y. !]*B%;V >-. .V39-. >3

(33) N-L*'B!"(q(. #V3"*ezO-L*'B!B. ( 4 : /a*0m/- .,` -. &W# $% () *:. *

(34) ^*.

(35) Nairne et al. (2007) _. Tx 2 : /a

(36) klm. >- + 01

(37) ?TL2,`-.. .!"# $% /a&'()

(38) `-.tu. /a*0% (). V. - ; d1. bc/ ?/. 593

(39) &W Y. 3e &Wf2>- ! 5 Y . ! J.V ! 3g. ! J2>-.

(40) 46;. 7 h8>- Darwin 1871 9:;< i= 1999, 2000 ..UV.j>- V23 ; &W.9BL()*.k!>%R%Tl . ῒ. 4.

(41) !. !>%L?/-?. ῐ῍῏ῌῑ. ΐ. viZo 102 s. V w. Px 20.68 SD1.02 ῎῔. yz (1980) L 20 s*oV .

(42) 50 F}L > P \L¡F} 1 . >¢r. >jB Darwin ;7

(43) P m@AnBoC D. s 20 *-{V Appendix A | -{. pE'F;GqH.V3IJV KL. >23

(44) r&}. 2005 ;7KL"r M. sbV. r 9F} ¤¥ ¤¦¥ ¤§¥ Tt . 6N.V3 Tooby & Cosmides (1992) Tt>' . _ r£l¨sTF} ¤ . B9201*IO.V3;M o.V3DPQRT. s[¥ ¤v s[¥ , ¤©ª¥ ¤s"¥ Tt

(45). >%L01T3O39-. -{VTL2 « ^~

(46) 0%Z. .j ( . ! J.V3

(47) ,` -.u. ¬. £9.9B^~*0% . -{V N 20 «. o. ¡/a. vSuTw2>- Ukx Buss, 1994 VW=. ® 1 *-{V i

(48) B5 ¯. 2000 ,` -.uvSuTw

(49) Py2>. 1 °}±. - grXY

(50) XYz/- * . o µ}¶ 5 · L39 ,.

(51) Zo>- P6

(52) { |}~} ,. V¸i N¯. ` *-./-[>-9

(53) P f\. B(L 5&¹¸iº°}± . >- V. 23 ,` -.uvSuTw \P f]. :O 1 Z:²³ P ´ lm(F

(54) ¤ ²r. #/-¥ .9. B..»sC*(F/-²³39 º.

(55) n^:;~. 146. 29 ¼. 2½.

(56) . n,&V-oUG!Y7 pq ./rsJt!. . '(G%. %&$!. !" # $. !" 20 . '(. 2)" L$%$u7 >V!01. 2 v\VwxUyz7 3045 , $%6U{. )*

(57) +, -!" 20

(58) #. P7)>J2)" # $% MNO. . /0. 2 12! 3 1. P 7 8Q L + !_ 8|. 3 2 4 560. 16 1 7 89. RS6}9)P$G%. : ;< =>?!" @ AB. G>W}9V. 7

(59) +,!CDE 24 F!G. #)" @H . >?!". XS. . 2)" }9)P. G>J2)" 8 >V! P 7 ;. ". 1 1 4YZ. @H IJ>?!". K L .7 # $%. 5 ![G%. 2)" ;. 2)" 8Q. NV. MNOP 7 8Q RS6T. X7 \], ^"GU_XJ# #. >P$UG%. `XS. V. 2)" TVG>WT. G>J2)" 8 >V!#)" @H. XS. P 7 ; . . " \]:;~} <=\. !"

(60) +, T>T; 25 ?7 ; }96; 26 ?7 l,; 26 ?7 8. ". 1 1 4YZ 5 ![G%. 2)" ;. 2)" 8Q. NV. +; 25 ?J>%!" @CDEU! 7 A= B UC. X7 \], ^"GU_XJ# #. 7) U7 \], BAB!". `XS. 8 :7 2 DUEC)PAB!". ".

(61) K L .7 >V!L 2 $%a!4$&b]Z. '(G%. @DUCJ;!LUvF! G 2. [ 7 5 !U_XP^"Uz!". 2)" # $% MNOP. ,\]=\] !_7 @

(62) +,-H . 7 8Q RS6cd)V4$&b]. [U 5 !!7 4I\]

(63) +,NJ. Ue. U_J[UK!L Nairne et al.,. e. fLgP$G%. 2)" ch$U. fLgPG>W8BV. G>J2. 2008, 1 \] 7 +7 T>T7 . )" 8 >V!#)" @H . M7 ;}967 7 2,100. . P 7 ; XS. 1 1 4YZ 5 ![G%. 2)" ;. ". ms $% 2,600 ms N>?! 7 5 !. 2)" 8Q. NV. X7 \], ^"GU_XJ# # `XS. ". >P. %i jOk l, U%P!_ m*U 2)" # $%. MNOP 7 8Q jOk U%P!_RS6d)>P$G% )" d)VG>Wd)V. 2. G>J2)" 8. £P". 20 R! 7 . ¤ 8 :7 <= U¥6g7 e. XS. [ " U$az)¦7 §%V7 ¨©¨k7 ª3. Y&. G$2V. 2)" ;. 2)" 8Q. LGS£!". <[RGCDEU«¬®M¯° ±U. \]UR!". . ". 1 1 4YZ 5 ![G%. [ ". z!'

(64). L>%!U<)PAB! 5. >V!#)" @H P 7 ;. B. BP7 ¡B¢`VQ. J7 ; N/0UBAB! 2. K L .7 >V!L$ PLU'(G%. [L O . . Table 1 T²<UVmW³U!". NV. §%V7 ¨©¨k7 ª3. YA. X7 \], ^"GU_XJ# #. ~ -<. !X^YZ!" T. `XS. ²<UU´[µ. ". K L .7 >V!+ !_. ¶. G. \U?!L·7 ;. ¸¹]>?! (F(3, 98)º10.19, p».0001)".

(65) ¼. p+,-)3#½=>. Table 1 Mean proportions of correct recall and standard deviations as a function of processing condition. 147. l1.00& '(mn [email protected] 3 @.42& [email protected]& 6@ .07 [email protected]& [email protected] 4/ JK (C# g 8op,-qr4i> Appen-. Processing condition. dix B Js tu 1.00 .v l1.00 d ?"&. Pleasantness. Selfreference. Spousechoice. Survival. 3wxJK(1 yvz{|. .53 .13. .48 .11. .57 .11. .66 .11. M SD. {./& 68I O} w+~ 4./gv. ῌ Table 2 Mean ratings and standard deviations as a function of processing condition Processing condition. Nairne et al. (2007) . p. zO!& - 4%'(mnwK !!9 hi>& #w/ w"& d'(mnw)*+,-. Pleasantness. Selfreference. Spousechoice. Survival. 3.02 .39. 3.61 .72. 2.69 .80. 3.15 .47. M SD. ῍. "#"& #$ ? ~% N"i>v 00

(66) )* +,-"$O#8{Ox 8# w ? v'(mn )*+,-"" Ox& . Ryan 5

(67) . g!IO ? . !"#. 9(i>&2 ?. $%& '()*+,-". h)*+,-001. #$./ 00'(. 234./.v& hwhw)*+,-=>. 1& 00)*+,-1 23. 4./bc?"& hg'(mn. 4./. #Do$)*+,-8/. Table 2 5 6

(68) 7 389. .w94OOx ? )*+,-.

(69) 7+9!:;89<& =>. 4./ & hz9!1. 2 ?/ (F(3, 98)@9.66, pA.0001) Ryan . ' )($ ¡V¢X44. 5

(70) ). ./fv zd" 8. *+,-. !"

(71) 7. Jf£¤¥ 18 5 )9)*+,. $./ '("

(72) 7. -=> 1¦9bc§. $./ BC

(73) 7#1D+E. *y Klein, Loftus, & Burton (1989) ¨ 2 . F8GH9<& 00 [email protected], )*+. )(©ª« 6+p1 5,486 ms ?/. ,- [email protected], '( [email protected], . ¬4I2,$ª« 6 4,235 ms& )*ª«. [email protected] ?"& '(I 2. 6 2,875 ms ?"& v 3 z 6+p1. ?/ (t(24)@1.77, pA.05). 1 23?/ 9 c®¯-°. JK(LMNO!

(74) 7#1+9. .Ov!O & ±²³8.O/´. !PQRSTUVWXYZ[\+EF g ]TS.

(75) {4O dµ$¶)(. 8JK(CGH9 /!

(76) N-. $8©9x.9!O4O 0 w. ^_4 &

(77) N- 1à. bc§ v0zO!#. !O4./bc?"& dJK(C. "?· . 6e

(78) 71D+f ?. 1¸¹

(79) 7zO!& w/w#$. g ? hi>& 00 [email protected]. ./"

(80) 7$OOx. [email protected]& [email protected]& )*+,-. 4./ º9<& #F»w/w2. 6 @. 11 3 @. 45& j @ 1.00 k. ./)*+,-

(81) 7w/w$./.

(82) Ystab. 148. M 29 ½. M2I.

(83) . # # $ !.

(84) . "'(. .

(85) O4H. !"# $

(86) . $ %. 4O4weU. Nairne et al. (2008) M 1 /. %

(87) &'(

(88) %

(89) )

(90) . 0 C$ :; $ m$. *#+

(91) , -.$ /01. $ V 12 "= F, yz. 234 5. )¡O433 ,gh$ /0¢. #+67

(92) 389'(. x%. :.%

(93) ;<. $ 9Y£FG

(94)

(95) O4yz. { &.

(96) '( = :.6. J, $ %/%g. %

(97) &Z. > 67.

(98) 38?@AB

(99) 3( % *! g CDE"#%

(100) FGH. . {. *PQabWX3( %

(101) #. [, \¤H. /08#^8. = $. /0R3S# /0¥G&C¥G. %&$ 'IJK L3M

(102) N(OD8$. T

(103) 38Y%) OC$ *]. L33(M

(104) N(O-.PQ).

(105) . STU+H. *R. 43 (Craik & Tulving, 1975) . /0'IJK$ V. W. O4. OC&¦g Dab. C Butler et al. (2009) *]

(106) . O. X. S&¦C3 OO Butler et al. (2009) . 5&Y%

(107) O4,-&Z+ X5*. M 2,3 /0$ 9

(108)

(109) §^

(110) &J $ S

(111) . R[.

(112) "\

(113) 3(3]^8$ # /05. \_/0&àbÖ$ S

(114) \_Oc. 1, 23C# V43(>$ /0_T&. RPQ). $%&-8`5PQab&c&67. e. )] 7$ d4&C2( 8. CFO43 ]OfM 1 /0$ Nairne et. %

(115) &FO43 Hd

(116) . S&¦8

(117) $ 9ST). 7. #^8 %4:34ef, = ,gh$ PQ. al. (2007) ©ª«¬/0

(118) "#$ 9

(119) . &ij, kl" mnopq= ] 7$ VC. *3®¯q H. VCrPQs bt"= &c,uv$ w. T&)3]O43 Og_T$ PhSi. 3d48#^8.

(120)

(121) *\°O*#

(122) w

(123). 9

(124)

(125)

(126) 3x yz. {

(127) -.PQ). yz. $%&:;-.) 37:&<|H. S&R3$ 9S. C$. %^-v3 %4O4weU

(128). {. 3( . %

(129) O4. 43 =>$ 2008=$ %. /012j] # 9d

(130) 45*]# $ O4.

(131) ?d4&c&8# # %

(132) . CFGH. FGH. 1993= O4 ST:34$. :.e }~. $ `5d4. 2(w3@d4&2(A PQs &

(133) ( c&3OBCH fO-8/0yz. 43 k(> Buss & Schmitt,. 12<F, ±«ª©>l-4). -8 ]O$ D. 9C# Nairne, Pandeirada, Gregory, &. {

(134) . Arsdall (2009) $ ²m

(135)

(136) ³´

(137) &J. 7$ VCVCyz { ST. $ # UO A nJµ/¶. %

(138) C'(. o²m·p$ j³´·pÒ4v. %!"

(139) O4yz {. +K E%

(140) '( 9

(141) FG

(142)

(143) O4yz. $ . {

(144) yHI. +$ Q

(145) o12$ e

(146) j12PQ). 3

(147) `LO. = &JOKK &LO Nairne et al. 2007,. # OO). %-8. M 4 /0=

(148) Nairne et al. 2008, M 1 /0= $ D. 9O4FH. 433$ . fO Klein et al. (1989) yHI 5 NO. O4&UODab3$ weU. O%

(149)

(150) 3$ KK 2,500ms #. , 8# ]^8. Nairne et al ab/0

(151) "#$ O4yH;

(152) O4yz 438ePg. /0PQ&nJ;*d4

(153) ( Nairne. { g. et al. (2007) &Y;q¸OC# nJ

(154). 433 KK. 38d4'¹

(155) 3(>$ k(> »hman O & Mi-. :34Qf-8$ R3. ST. neka (2001) nJº»¬&cO¼r

(156) { &.

(157) 2¹º

(158) '`#$» ¼½

(159) aX. 149.

(160) . (*,['kl\+B#.

(161) . o8YV X]*^_). !"

(162) # $ . `. (). *+ ,. %&

(163) '. - .*/. 01234

(164) '#56

(165) 7 89:;< =>?@7A B

(166) *. C DEF.

(167) '7 G+H89:;<BI +J& K LM*N

(168) 'DE OPQRS#TB UV DE WX *BIU& Y

(169) 'B&Z) [\ *KG =. DE#B. IG. IC Klein, Cos-. mides, Tooby, & Chance, 2002A !]^_"

(170) '`#$aXF %&' b(

(171) F +V cd.*PQRS e) fgMh *+h*N . _"B*,-.+i;j+. !klDE# Z).

(172) B /. #YG 01$23 Z). . 4/0123 UB56+ #7

(173) F* mVnB#o8

(174) 9p :q mrIs t*uv B&lw;x =

(175) ' y<A B t) v B& z[;x =/0123A =>#rI?;+ =@ AB{|}CD 2000A 'Z). DE#B. I

(176) ' y<B&~Clw;x). . +V

(177) '`#$4$UVEB & 01DEF+$23 GH IJBK/0123#

(178) z[;x ). ?;B*

(179) *~KMn. *+ I DE#

(180) s lw;x =y<A Bz[;x =/0123A #Lmm *Y) mKM#M rIB?;+B~ &

(181) B 9pDE#UVN G *(J&) ' !klOqkl *.

(182) '`#B. P7 Q#e)BR`# BmBST#U )F BFB`#aXDV (Rogers et al., 1977) R. aXB

(183) '`#aX. B`#P}_W

(184) #e)B DV#U_W#/?;+(J & 'r cd_"#XY

(185) 'DEkl7. C)V+V Z*. . *cdkl. ῌ῏῎῍ a b (1980). 50 0iR; c

(186) de fg 9h =M ¡iA 135, 42῍87. Buss, D. M. (1994). The evolution of desire. New York: Basic Books. =¢£ D. M ¤j¥k =lA (2000) mBn( + o¡A Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategy theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204῍232. Butler, A. C., Kang, S. H. K., & Roediger, H. L. (2009). Congruity e#ects between materials and processing tasks in the survival processing paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1477῍1486. Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 671῍684. Craik, F. I. M., & Tulving, E. (1975). Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 268῍294. Darwin, C. R. (1871). The decent of man and selection in relation to sex. London: John Murray. =¦;§¨© C. R. @ABpª =lA (1999, 2000) 9p Bqr I, II h|s«dtA @AB{|}CD ¬ (2000) ) * uvw =xA Pyz® ¯°<±²{ | pp. 383῍439. }~ ³ (2008) ´µ¶;·DEBῌ`# aX#7¸ῌ F 51, 43῍58. (Horiuchi, T. (2008). Episodic memory and self: Japanese Psychological Review, 51, 43῍58.) Klein, S. B., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., & Chance, S. (2002). Decisions and the evolution of memory: Multiple systems, multiple functions. Psychological Review, 109, 306῍329. Klein, S. B., Loftus, J., & Burton, H. A. (1989). Two self-reference e#ects: The importance of distinguishing between self-descriptiveness judgments and autobiographical retrieval in self-referent encoding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 853῍865. Nairne, J. S., & Pandeirada, J. N. S. (2008a). Adaptive memory: Remembering with a stone-age brain. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17, 239῍ 243. Nairne, J. S., & Pandeirada, J. N. S. (2008b). Adaptive memory: Is survival processing special? Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 377῍385. Nairne, J. S., Pandeirada, J. N. S., Gregory, K. J., & Ars-.

(187) 150. 012&34. dall, J. E. V. (2009). Adaptive memory: Fitnessrelevance and the hunter-gatherer mind. Psychological Science, 20, 740῍746. Nairne, J. S., Pandeirada, J. N. S., & Thomson, S. R. (2008). Adaptive memory: The comparative value of survival processing. Psychological Science, 19, 176῍180. Nairne, J. S., Thompton, S. R., & Pandeirada, J. N. S. (2007). Adaptive memory: Survival processing enhances retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 263῍273. »hman, O A., & Mineka, S. (2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108, 483῍ 522. Otgaar, H., Smeets, T., & van Bergen, S. (2010). Picturing survival memories: Enhanced memory after fitness-relevant processing occurs for verbal and visual stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 38, 23῍28.. 5 29 6. 527. Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., & Kirker, W. S. (1977). Self-reference and encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 677῍688. Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1992). The psychological foundations of culture. In J. H. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 19῍136. Weinstein, Y., Bugg, J. M., & Roediger, H. L. (2008). Can the survival recall advantage be explained by basic memory processes? Memory & Cognition, 36, 913῍919. (2005)

(188) ! " #$% & '(

(189) )*+,- pp. 7῍31. ῌ2010. 6. 15 ./- 2011. 1. 27 .ῌ.

(190) RS TUVWXYZ[\)]^_àb6c. 151. Appendix A Stimulus materials for Experiment ( category names in parentheses). . . -./ 01. = >.

(191) . !. 2 3 . ?@ AB. . "# $%. 4 5. CDEF GH. . & '. 678 9. I JKL. . ( )*+,. :; <. MN O. Appendix B Each participant’s proportion of correct recall and g (Goodman-Kruskal’s rank measure of association) value as a function of processing condition Processing condition Pleasant. M Range. Self-reference. Recall. g. Recall. .70 .70 .70 .70 .70 .70 .65 .60 .55 .55 .55 .55 .55 .55 .50 .50 .45 .45 .45 .45 .45 .40 .35 .35 .20. .31 .27 .06 P.02 P.27 P.34 .00 .59 .38 .37 .19 .13 .00 P.42 .20 P.29 .73 .70 .38 P.42 P.44 .29 .04 P.52 .42. .70 .65 .65 .60 .60 .60 .55 .55 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .50 .45 .45 .45 .40 .40 .40 .40 .35 .35 .25 .25. .53 .73. Q. .09 P.52. .48 P1.00. g. Spouse-choice Recall. g. Survival Recall. g .38 P.11 P.13 P.56 .67 .22 .10 .08 .48 .23 .13 P.39 .24 .22 P.22 P.24 P.19 P.27 .56 .27 .04 .00 P.52 24 .37. P.06 .33 .30 .41 .22 .04 .66 P.84 P1.00 .44 .16 .01 P.15 P.42 P.47 .33 .23 P1.00 .63 .39 P.01 P.15 .15 .08 .45 .04. .85 .75 .70 .70 .65 .65 .65 .65 .65 .60 .60 .60 .55 .55 .55 .55 .55 .50 .50 .50 .50 .45 .45 .45 .40 .35. P.53 .54 .70 .20 .67 .35 .06 P.02 P.13 .42 P.38 P.49 .52 .40 .33 .06 P.03 .42 .29 .00 P.61 .46 .33 .05 P1.00 .07. .80 .80 .80 .80 .75 .75 .75 .75 .70 .70 .70 .70 .65 .65 .65 .65 .60 .60 .55 .55 .55 .55 .55 .50. .40. .11 Q P1.00. .57 .70. .10 Q P1.00. .66 .67. Q. .07 P.56.

(192)