• 検索結果がありません。

New coefficient inequalities for starlike and convex functions (New Extension of Historical Theorems for Univalent Function Theory)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "New coefficient inequalities for starlike and convex functions (New Extension of Historical Theorems for Univalent Function Theory)"

Copied!
4
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

New coefficient

inequalities

for starlike

and

convex functions

MAMORU NUNOKAWA,

SHIGEYOSHI

OWA,

HITOSHI SAITOH,

and

NORIHIRO TAKAHASHI

Abstfact. The object of the present paper is to derive new coefficient inequalities for umivalent

and starlike, and univalent and convex functions defined in the open unit disk $U$. Our results are the

improvements of the previous theorems given by J. Clunie and F. R. Keogh ([1]) and by H. Silverman

([2]).

1

Introduction

Let $A$ denote the class of functions $f(z)$ ofthe form

$f(z)= \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_{n}z^{n}$ $(a_{1}=1)$

which are analytic in the open unit disk $U=2\{z\in \mathbb{C} : |z|<1\}$

.

A function $f(z)\in A$ is

said to be univalent and starlike in $U$ if it satisfies ${\rm Re} \{\frac{zf’(z)}{f(z)}\}>0$

for all $z\in U$

.

Also a function $f(z)\in A$ is said to be univalent and

convex

in $U$ if

it

satisfies

${\rm Re} \{1+’\frac{\sim^{f’’(z)}}{f^{l}(z)}\}>0$

for all $z\in U$

.

Mathematics Subject

Classification

$(1991):30\mathrm{C}45$

Key Words and Phrases: Analytic,univalent, starlike, convex

数理解析研究所講究録

(2)

Clunie and Keogh ([1]) (also Silverman ([2])) have proved the following result: If

$f(z)\in A$ satisfies

$\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}n|a_{n}|\leq 1$,

then $f(z)$ is univalent and starlike in $U$. If $f(\approx)\in A$ satisfies

$\sum_{n=2}^{\infty}n^{2}|a_{n}|\leq 1$,

then $f(\approx)$ is univalent and

convex

in $U$.

In the present paper, we consider new coefficient inequalities for functions $f(z)$ to be

univalent and starlike, and univalent and convex in $U$.

2

Coefficient

inequalities

Our main result for the coefficient inequality of $f(z)$ to be univalent and starlike in $U$ is

contained in

Theorem 1. Let $f(z)$ be in the class $A$ and

$\max_{n\geq\iota}n|a_{n}|=p|a_{p}|$

.

If

$f(z)$

satisfies

$\sum_{n=1,n\neq p}^{\infty}(|n-p|+p)|a_{n}|\leq p|a_{p}|$,

then $f(z)$ is $uni\prime valent$ and starlike in $U$

.

Proof.

Applying the maximum principle of analytic functions, the following inequality

folds true on $|z|=1$

$|zf’(z)-pf( \approx)|-|pf(z)|=|\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(n-p)a_{n}\approx^{n}|-p|\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}a_{n}z^{n}|$

$\leq\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}|n-p||a_{n}||z|^{n}-p(|c\iota_{p}||\approx|^{p}-\sum_{pn=1,n\neq}^{\infty}|a_{n}||\approx|^{n})$

$= \sum_{n=1,n\neq p}^{\infty}(|n-p|+p)|a_{n}|-p|a_{p}|\leq 0$

.

Therefore, it follows that

$| \frac{zf’(z)}{f(_{\sim}\mathit{7})}-p|<p$

for all $\sim 7\in U$

.

This shows that $f(\approx)$ is univalent and starlike in $U$.

$\square$

(3)

Remark 1. If

$\max_{n\geq 1}n|a_{n}|=|a_{1}|=1$,

then Theorem 1 becomes the result by Clunie and Keogh ([1]) (also by

Silverman

([2]). Corollary 1.

If

a

function

$f(z)\in A$

satisfies

$\max_{n\geq 1}n|a_{n}|=2|a_{2}|$

$an,d$

$\sum_{n=3}^{\infty}n|a_{n}|\leq 2|a_{2}|-3$

,

then $f(z)$ is univalent and starlike in $U$.

Bymeans ofthe definitions between starlike functions and

convex

functions, it follows

that $f(z)\in A$ is univalent and

convex

in $U$ ifand only if$zf^{l}(z)$ is univalent starlike in $U$

.

Therefore Theorem 1 gives us

Theorem 2. Let $f(\approx)$ be in the class $A$ and

$\max_{n\geq 1}n^{2}|a_{n}|=p^{2}|a_{p}|$

.

If

$f(z)$

satisfies

$\sum_{n=1n\neq)p}^{\infty}n(|n-p|+p)|a_{n}|\leq p^{2}|a_{p}|$,

then $f(z\rangle$ $i,s$ univalent and convex in $U$.

Remark 2. If

$\max_{n\geq 1}n^{2}|a_{n}|=|c\iota_{1}|=1$,

then Theorem 2 becomes the result by Silverman ([2]). Corollary 2.

If

a

function

$f(z)\in A$

satisfies

$\max_{n\geq 1}n^{2}|a_{n}|=4|a_{2}|$

and

$\sum_{n=3}^{\infty}n|a_{n}|\leq 4|a_{2}|-3$,

then $f(z)$ is univalent and convex in $l^{\gamma}$.

(4)

References

[1] J.Clunie and F.R.Keogh,

On

starlike and

convex

schlichtfunctions,J. London Math. Soc. 35(1960),229-233.

[2] H.Silverman, Univalent

functions

with negative coefficients, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.

51(1975),109-116.

Mamoru Nunokawa

Department

of

mathematics University

of

Gunma

Aramaki, Maebashi, Gunma

371-8510

Japan Shigeyoshi $Owa$ Department

of

Mathematics Kinki University Higashi-Osaka, Osaka

577-8502

Japan Hitoshi Saitoh Department

of

Mathematics Gunma College

of

Technology Toriba, Maebashi, Gunma

371-8530

Japan Norihiro Takahashi

Departmen.$t$

of

Mathematics

University

of

Gunma Aramaki, Maebashi, Gunma

371-8510

Japan

参照

関連したドキュメント

To complete the proof of the lemma we need to obtain a similar estimate for the second integral on the RHS of (2.33).. Hence we need to concern ourselves with the second integral on

In view of the result by Amann and Kennard [AmK14, Theorem A] it suffices to show that the elliptic genus vanishes, when the torus fixed point set consists of two isolated fixed

We develop three concepts as applications of Theorem 1.1, where the dual objects pre- sented here give respectively a notion of unoriented Kantorovich duality, a notion of

The (strong) slope conjecture relates the degree of the col- ored Jones polynomial of a knot to certain essential surfaces in the knot complement.. We verify the slope conjecture

We construct some examples of special Lagrangian subman- ifolds and Lagrangian self-similar solutions in almost Calabi–Yau cones over toric Sasaki manifolds.. Toric Sasaki

In this section, we show that, if G is a shrinkable pasting scheme admissible in M (Definition 2.16) and M is nice enough (Definition 4.9), then the model category structure on Prop

If K is positive-definite at the point corresponding to an affine linear func- tion with zero set containing an edge E along which the boundary measure vanishes, then in

A cyclic pairing (i.e., an inner product satisfying a natural cyclicity condition) on the cocommutative coalge- bra gives rise to an interesting structure on the universal