謝辞
執筆にご協力をいただきました日本教育大学院大学の先生方に感謝いたします。
文献
Brown, A. L. (1992). Design experiments: Theoretical and methodological challenges in evaluating complex interventions in classroom settings. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2 (2), 141-178.
Byrnes, J. P. (1996). Cognitive Development and Learning in Instructional Contexts, Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Collins, A. (1999). The changing infrastructure of education research. In E.C. Lagemann & L. S. Shulma (Eds.), Issues in Education Research: Problems and Possibilities, 289-298. San Francisco, CA: JosseyBass. Gick, M. L. & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving, Cognitive Psychology, 12, 306-355. 加藤由香里（2014）．授業観察システムを利用した授業検討会における FDer の役割，『教育システ
ム情報学会誌』，31(1), 110-118.
国立教育政策研究所（2009）．大学・短大で FD に携わる人のための FD マップと利用ガイドライン， FDer 研究会編．
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics, and Culture in Everyday Life. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Maier, N. R. F. (1931). Reasoning in humans. II:The solution of a problem and its appearance in consciousness. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 12 (2), 181-194.
益川弘如・村山功・坂井宣幸・石上靖芳（2009）．授業改善力を高める協調的授業観察分析法の提案 と実践，『静岡大学教育学部付属教育実習総合センター紀要』，17, 51-58. 益川弘如（2012）．デザイン研究・デザイン実験の方法,日本教育工学会（監修）清水康敬・中山実・ 向後千春（編著），『教育工学選書3 教育工学研究の方法』，ミネルヴァ書房，177-198. 文部科学省（2005）．中央教育審議会答申「我が国の高等教育の将来像」， http://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/shingi/chukyo/chukyo0/toushin/05013101.htm（2014 年 12 月 18 日閲覧） 文部科学省（2014）．大学における教育内容等の改革状況について（概要）， http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/koutou/daigaku/04052801/__icsFiles/afieldfile/2014/11/18/1353488_1.pdf （2014 年 12 月 18 日閲覧）
Nisbett, R. E. & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes.
Psychological Review, 84(3), 231-259.
大塚雄作（2011）．FD コミュニティの形成と評価の役割，京都大学高等教育研究開発センター編， 『大学教育のネットワークを作る』，東信堂．
Saxe, G. B. (1990). The interplay between children's learningin school and out-of-school contexts, M. Gardner, J. G. Greeno & et al., eds, Toward a Scientific Practice of Science Education, 219-234. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
白水始（2012）．認知科学と学習科学における知識の転移．『人工知能学会誌』，27(4), 347-358. 田中毎実（1999）．大学授業のフィールドワークから大学教育学へ―公開実験授業プロジェクト 3
年間の中間的総括，『京都大学高等教育研究』，5, 1-22.
田中毎実（2003）．ファカルティ・ディベロップメント論，京都大学高等教育研究開発推進センター 編，『大学教育学』，培風館.
Thorndike, E. L. (1913). Educational Psychology (Vols. 1 and 2). New York: Columbia University Press. Thorndike, E. L., & R. S. Woodworth. (1901). The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the
efficiency of other functions, Psychological Review, 8, 247-261.
遠山紗矢香（2013）．初期理解の構築支援による建設的交互作用の促進－認知科学の協調学習を例と して，『認知科学』，20 (2),177-203.
Wertheimer, M. (1959). Productive Thinking, New York: Harper and Row.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Research Paper
Practice Study of Improving Teaching Methods Through
Mutual Classroom Visitations and Self-Observations:
A Case Study at a Professional Graduate School
Yamada, Masayuki
_______________________________________________________________________________________Faculty development (FD) activities have been required in recent years. They are designed with the purpose of improving teaching practices in the Japan Professional School of Education. In this study, we investigated for three FD activities. The participants engaged in mutual classroom visitations in 2012 and 2013, and in 2013, they also carried out self-observations. The results of analysis of the comment entry forms for each teacher showed an increased number of comments about the participants improving their own teaching practices. Also, we observed differences in the quality of descriptions about teaching improvements. Based on these results, the following are suggested: 1) Through mutual classroom visitations, teachers consider how to improve their lessons more than they do by simply describing their own lessons or teaching practices. 2) Through mutual classroom visitations, they describe methods of improving their teaching. 3) In observing their own lessons, teachers describe teaching improvements to be made in connection to student learning activitys. However, further investigation is needed to explore whether FD activity has led to actual improvements in teaching practices.
Key words: FD, TEACHING IMPROVEMENT, MUTUAL CLASSROOM VISITATIONS, SELF-
OBSERVATIONS, PROFESSIONAL GRADUATE SCHOOL
