類似セグメント探索 RDDS 法の評価
全文
(2) 2. as mt rifas. skip. I. 2.1. distance f Pt. d(Pt><t)iq Very. vt (t =. 2.3. RIFAS >:. sequence of. _ _T _ _ 0U?P_ut Props-_ i. i:. RIFAS. AS. 2v\n\. 2.2. (1) P = (pt),Q =. Active. (4) P \zMLX. S^xU, ^ > 0. rn&tu s dP(ptiq)<9.. (2). Bf-SO fc. (1) (3). (3) Vn<. \ dp(pt,q)<e. pt. dp(pt,q). I 2: RIFAS. -84-.
(3) n. 3 3.1 (9). u x,. (9). * (5). t = (ti,. 3.2 (5). (6). R) %¥&£?%> h (6). (> 0). (6). d(t) < 0.. ^. 3.3. (RDDS). (RDDS: Recursive Diamond Division Search) yfz. HI 3 \Z7F~f<k:D \zmM&M T = [0,Ti) x. [0,T2) x ...[0,Tj) £|rH<£>¥!£ W <D h 3&zXW8ltt%>. TcUiBi(ti,W).. (10). (11). d(t). >. (ii) d(t). \ZvkLtc. A (7) ttSC (1) (7) <0H. do). (12) (12). Boo(ti,r)cB1(ti,/r).. T ^MMT3*S r = W/I <D .. W) 5:. C<Dm T C UiBoofaW/I) c. loo (13). (13). r = VT/7 = L/2.. (8). 0, Zo. (8) -85-. 2^ ffi'ttTflM^Sc 2/ 2', iE 2/ [10].. IE.
(4) *) *Jti£Vt>Z<DT?jmm<D [left, right'] X« [left', right]. {. right'. = center - i? — 1. left'. = center + R + 1.. (14). [left, right] \zmttmb, wB =. (right - left + 1) /2. h 3: CampusWave x—. 4. 33. rdds omm. ^. ^ t7Uy#m WB. 4.1. RDDS-lr t AS,. RDDS0E«tt Z CampusWave x-*^-X [11]. tt 713, 645, 520. W. FM. RDDS-lr. 0.. \z wB. RDDS |WHi, RDDS-lr . RDDS,. Lfc. VQ. M = 32 t bfg 1 07-. (Wi -250). RDDS-lr. 6 LBG. 4.2. (300. RDDS. RDDS. •2P>\zwB> 2000 .. 520-530. (b): Mfc. .. RDDS-lr 6=0.1 RDDS-lr6=0.05 RDDS-lr 6=0.01 AS 6=0.1 AS 6=0.05 AS 6=0.01 RDDS 6=0.1. RDDS-lr. . 04K RDDS-lr. left. ^skio resion T. right'. center. —— --— * -— ■■-•-•. right. T. UO1UC1 left'. 1000. 2000. 3000. 4000. 5000. gl 4: RDDS-lr. 5: mmmm ettfuy^mwB [left, right] CD^it center (=(left+right)/2). -86-. 2. RDDS-lr. rddsat.
(5) 4.3. 2 B«R5IJ«fcl-t^ > 2jW 3W. 3 TSfi^fc /i 2W. W. [9]. 0 6 lc. W. t (iWJW). 2W. 3W. 4W. 5W. 6W. 7W. \t 2 iW (i = 0,1,...). 6:. 0 = 0,1,2,...) £3S*ff*l$, x. = 256 <Z)P#, 111,772 (= 618435 - 506663). HI (18.07%), W = 128 <Z)B#, 1,146,346 (= 1561240 414894) II (73.43%) ifc*. W *t. 3^ (2iW,2jW), (2iW,. T = 225000, L = 625, W = 256 <ht"3£ J = 438. **©TE»f Jlfc8t"*tH|C*»4 96141. (15). tf 95703. (11). 191,844 (= 96141 + 95703) £&%>. fot. 5£ (15). <f 4.4. (15). 3. (16). (16). W/3. as as RDDS-2. fcJ4 CampusWave x—^^—. »J(J CampusWavex—. JxJ. 0,. 60 » (r = 3126) -87-. El,.
(6) RDDS-2. T3 = 31263 = 3.05 x 1010 256, L = 625,. ,. (RDDS-2+DM). 9 = 0.3, W =. ffm. 2: RDDS-3. in = 0. t Lit. W = 256. 1 ffl. 183 = 5832 t fc*. rdds. RDDS-3. Wmin. 3.0510. 5. titXS rdds. 7 = 2 wmin =. , -f. , wmin = 4,8 RDDS-3. 1.504 * 106(= 7240 * 603/1040) RDDS-3. Exhaustive. Campu$WaveO3. CampusWawO2 CampusWawOI. 7: RDDS-3(T). [12] R.Vidal: An Algorithm for Finding Nearest Neighbor in (Ap proximately) Constant Average Time, Pattern Recognition Let ters, No.4, pp. 145-158 (1986).. -88-.
(7)
関連したドキュメント
A Tabu search procedure is then used to select a subset of financial ratio variables which best predict bankruptcy from among a larger initial set of 20 variables, and use that
A Tabu search procedure is then used to select a subset of financial ratio variables which best predict bankruptcy from among a larger initial set of 20 variables, and use that
Since the optimizing problem has a two-level hierarchical structure, this risk management algorithm is composed of two types of swarms that search in different levels,
An easy-to-use procedure is presented for improving the ε-constraint method for computing the efficient frontier of the portfolio selection problem endowed with additional cardinality
13 proposed a hybrid multiobjective evolutionary algorithm HMOEA that incorporates various heuristics for local exploitation in the evolutionary search and the concept of
Under certain assumptions on the sequence (P N ) N≥0 (which still allow for the standard probabilis- tic models of algorithms associated with binary search trees, digital search
For performance comparison of PSO-based hybrid search algorithm, that is, PSO and noising-method-based local search, using proposed encoding/decoding technique with those reported
In this paper, we propose an exact algorithm based on dichotomic search to solve the two-dimensional strip packing problem with guillotine cut2. In Section 2 we present some