RecendyI
am
considerhgon
the global theory of shgularities.Perhaps whatIhavejust statedreminds
you
ofthePl\"uckerfornula for plane irreduciblecurves.
Asyou
know, itisan
equality connecthgintegersdefmedas
local invariantsofshgularities and htegers defmed
as
globalinvariants ofvarieties suchas genus,
degree, and classnumber. It restrictspossible combhations of singularities. Thedata obtained froman
actual combhation of shgularities satisfy the Plucker formula. However, given global
hvariantsand
a
combhation of local singularities satisfyingit,there doesnotnecessarilyexista planecurve
with such data. Forexample,a
planesexticrationalcurve
with unique shgularityoftype $A_{20}$ (theshgularity locaUy defined by $x^{21}+y^{2}=0$)
never
exists,though the data satisfythePl\"uckerfornula:
(Inthis
case
$g=0,$$d=6$ and$\delta_{X}=1og=\frac{(d-1)(d-2)}{foranA_{20}2}-\sum\delta_{X}- siu1a1$
Our pointofviewisdifferent from this. We
use
graphs for the description instead of integers. (Bya
graphwe mean
a
fmiteone-dimensional complex withsome
additionalstructure.)Moreover,
we
aim togive thenecessary
andsufficient conditionfor thedescription ofpossible combhations of singularities. The following figure explah$s$our
basic framework.TheBasic graph
$+Conditions$ $|$ $|$
givhgresmctions
Here
we
considera
typical exampletoexplaintheabove figure. We consider thecase
of cubiccurves
hthetwo-dimensionalprojectivespace
$\mathbb{P}^{2}=\mathbb{P}^{2}(C)$over
the complex field C.(Below
we
alwaysassume
thatthe ground field is the complex field C.) Itiseasy
togivethe classificationof plane cubiccuives. We have the followhg9
items. (Belowwe
draw the figureof thesetofreal pohts,i.e.thehtersectionof the
curve
in $\mathbb{P}^{2}(C)$ and $\mathbb{P}^{2}(\mathbb{R})$,becausewe
cannotdraw the actual figure of thesetof complexpoints.) Thegraphs beneath the figuresare
$A_{1}$ $A_{2}$
$O$ $\mapsto$
$2A_{1}$ $A_{3}$ $3A_{1}$
$O$
O O O $O$
mathematics.)Theconcept ofDynkin graphs iswell-knownbecause it plays the keyroleinthe
classificationtheory of semi-simple Lie
groups.
Thelocal defmingequations $f(x,y)=0$ of thesesingularities of dimension 1are as
follows:$A_{k}:x^{k+1}+y^{2}=0$ $(k=1,2,3,\cdots)$
$D_{t}:x^{\ell-1}+xy^{2}=0$ $(t=4,5,6.\cdots)$
$E_{6}:x^{3}+y^{4}=0$
$E_{7}:x^{3}+xy^{3}=0$
$E_{8}$
:
$x^{3}+y^{5}=0$(Theabove
are
equationsofcurve
singularities. Whenwe
considersurface singularitieswe
adda
tern $z^{2}$ totheaboverespective equationandwe
consider the singularity defmed by$f(x,y)+z^{2}=0$
.
Forexample thesurface singularity oftype $A_{k}$ is defined by $x^{k+1}+y^{2}+z^{2}=0.)$The above seventh cubic
curve
has aunique singularity and it isof type $D_{4}$. Wedrawa
Dynkin graph oftype $D_{4}$ beneaththe seventh
curve.
By thesame
methodwe
can
associatea
Dynkin graph (possiblywith severalcomponents) toeach cubic
curve.
We have theemptygraph, $A_{1},$$A_{2},2A_{1},$$A_{3},3A_{1}$ and $D_{4}$
.
Here perhaps
you
can
noticethatthe classification of cubiccurves
corresponds tosubgraphs of $D_{4}.7$ typesof cubiccurves
haveone-to-onecorrespondences with7kinds ofsubgraphs of$D_{4}$
.
Inthe
case
of plane cubiccurves
thebasic graphisthe Dynkin graph oftype $D_{4}$.
Theoperationistopick
a
subgraph. There isno
condition givingrestrictions. Thesetofallgraph obtained from $D_{4}$ under this situationis equaltothesetofpossible combinations ofsingularities.
As suggested by the above example of cubiccurves, the meaning of
our
basicframework aboveisas
follows.First
we
set$up_{\zeta}$an
appropriaterange
of objectswe
treat.For examplewe
considerone
ofthefollowings([5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [17], [18]):
1. AU plane cubic
curves
without multiplecomponents.2. Allplane quardc
curves
without multiplecomponents.3.
Allplanesexticcurves
with only ADE singularitiesas
singularities.4.
Allspace
cubic surfaces with onlyisolated singularities.5. All
space
quartic surfaceswithonly ADEsingularitiesas
singularities.7. Allcomplete intersectionswithbidegree$(2, 3)$inthe fourdimensional projective space.
Inthe seventh
case
weassume
that allsingularitiesare
ADEsingularities.For the
range
of objectswe
consider,thebasicgraph is determined. For simplercases
thebasic graph is unique. Somebasic graphscan
appear
in the complicatedcases.
Nexttheoperation
on
graphs is defined. By the operationwe can
makenew graphs froma
given graph. Atpresent
we
use
three kindsofoperations-topicka
subgraph,an
elementarytransformation, and
a
tie transformation. These threeoperationshavemanychoicesontheway oftheirprocess,
andwe
can
make considerablymanykmds of graphs froma
givenone.
In addition
we
havesome
conditionsgiving restrictionson
theprocess
ofoperations. Underthe above conditionswe
considerthesetof allgraphs obtained starting fromone
ofthe basic graphs. Amemberof thissetisnotnecessarily connected. Thetypeof
a
connectedcomponentcorrespondstothetypeof
a
singularity, and thenumberofconnectedcomponentsof eachtypeindicates the number ofcorrespondingsingularities. Inthisway
a
graph is translated into the meaning ofa
combinationofsingularities, and thesetofobtained graphs coincides with thesetof possible combinations of singularities.Sofar
we
have explainedthesuperficialpartofour
theory. Indeed thegreater partishiddeninthe background. First,
as
the bestweapon, weuse
thetheoryofperiodsof algebraicvarieties. By thiswe
translatethe problem intothe language ofintegral symmerric bilinear forms. Itis known that interestinggroups
are
associatedwithbilinear forms. So using thegroup
theory, in particular usingthetheoryofreflectiongroups, wetranslate it furtherintothelanguage ofgraphs.
The above is
our
philosophy. In thecase
of sufficientlylowdimension,lowdegreeandlowcodimension,thisphilosophy worksmiraculouslywell andwe
can
getthe splendid description ofpossible combinations of singularities. Infact thispartis the discovery of Englishmathematician Timmsatthebeginning of thiscentury[6]. English mathematician DuValwrote
another
paper
giving interpretationof Timms’ result from hisview pointlittle later[1].We
can
imaginethatwe
are
lookingatonlya
smallpart, and thatthereexists ahiddengeneralprinciple in the background, since Timms’ resultis
very
beautiful. Therefore wecan
try tosearch howfarour
philosophycan
be applied,andifpossiblewe
wouldbe abletofindoutthe hidden general principle. This is
our
objective. Todaywe
have theory of periods of K3surfaces, fully developed theory of integral bilinearforms, the theory ofreflection
groups
includingWeyl
groups
andthelike. Using these theorieswe
can
go
toa
considerably deep point.However,the world of actual algebraicvarietiesismuch
more
complicated than whatwe
expect. Thereforesometimesthevertical equality in the first figuredoesnotexactly holdand
a
fewexceptions
appear.
Thisisa
really strangephenomenon actuallyoccurring,thoughwehavedefined absolutelycorrectbasic graphs,operations, restrictionconditions etc. Our theory may have
some
defects,or
theremay
bea
faint break in the complete law because of the wisdom of the god.Besides, atpresent,onlyADE singularities
can
correspondtoconnectedgraphs. More complicated singularities have appeared in the objects ofour
study,but I donotknowhowwe
treatthemexactly. We have
some
evidences showingthatsimilar coIrespondencescan
bepointscorrespondingtoactual algebraicvarieties is enough for
us.
Perhapstogivea necessary
andsufficient condition is
an
extremelydifficultproblem.)Atpresent
on one
handIam
making steadyefforts totake complicatedworsesingularities inour
theoryandeffortstodevelope the theorytootheraspects,andon
theotherhandI expect that Ican
fmd bychancea
keytothehiddengeneral principlefromadifferentview point(forexample
a
viewpointoftherepresentationtheory of Liegroups).Intheabove explanation of
our
philosophywehaveomittedsome
factstohelp reader’s understanding. Herewe
supplement them.Themostimpomantpoint isthatbytheframeworkin the first figurewe
can
treat notonly combinations of singularities of global algebraicvarieties but also otherobjects. Wecan
treatthe following twoitems bythe presenttheory of
ours:
A. Possible combinations of singular fibers of elliptic surfaces.
B. Possible combinations of singularities oflocalobjects such
as
deformation fibers in thesemi-universal deformation family of
a
fixedisolatedsingularity.We explainthe item A. Let $\Phi:Xarrow \mathbb{P}^{1}$ be
an
elliptic surfaceover
$\mathbb{P}^{1}$.($X$ is
a
smoothcompactcomplex surface. For
any
generalpoint $x\in \mathbb{P}^{1}$ the inverse image $\Phi^{-1}(x)$ isa curve
ofgenus 1.) We
assume
that $\Phi$ hasno
multiple fibers. It is known that the Eulernumber$e(X)$ of $X$ ispositiveanda multiple of12.
When $e(X)=12,$$X$ is
a
rationalsurface, andwe can
describepossible combinations ofsingular fibers using
our
framework. Inthiscase
the basic graph is the Dynkingraph of type$E_{8}$ and
we
can
apply elementarytransformations twiceas
the operation.Thereisno
resrrictioncondition. We
can
associatetheresulting Dynkin graphswith possiblecombinations of singularfibers ([2], [7]).When $e(X)=24,$ $X$ is
a
K3 surface. Also in thiscase we
can
developeour
theory. Somepartial results have already been obtained([16]). Ithink that
we can
completethetheory in thiscase
in future.As forthe item $B$,
we
knowthatin thecases
correspondingtothe following singularitiespossiblecombinationsofsingularitiesofdeformation fibers
can
bedescribed usingour framework:1. ADE singularities.
2. 3kinds ofhypersurface simple elliptic singularities([2], [4], [7]).
3. Apartof
cusp
singularities([3]).4. Apartof14kinds of hypersurface triangle singularities. 5. 6kindsof hypersurface quadrilateral singularities ([16]).
References
[1] DuVal,P.: On Isolated Singularities which donotAffecttheCondition of Adjunction I,
$\Pi$,III. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 30, 453-465,
483-491
(1934)[2] Looijenga,E.: On the Semi-universal Deformation of
a
Simple Elliptic Hypersurface Singularity,n.
Topology 17,23-40
(1978)[3] Looijenga,E.:Rational Surfaces with
an
Anti-canonical Cycle. Ann. ofMath. (2) 114,267-322
(1981)[4] Saito,K.: Einfach ElliptischeSingularitaten. Invent. Math. 23,
289-325
(1974)[5] Tang, Li-Zhong: Rational Double Points
on a
NomlalOctic K-3 Surface.Thesis, FudanUniversity, China(1991)
[6] Timms, G.: The Nodal Cubic Surfaces andtheSurfaces from which They
are
Derived byProjection. Proc.Roy. Soc. Ser. A 119, 213-348 (1928)
[7] Urabe,Tohsuke: On Singularities
on
Degenerate Del Pezzo Surfaces ofDegree 1,2.Proc. Symp. PureMath. 40Part 2, 587-591 (1983)
[8] Urabe,Tohsuke: On QuarticSurfaces andSextic Curves with Certain Singularities.
Proc. JapanAcad.
59
Ser. A No.9,434-437
(1983)[9] Urabe,Tohsuke: OnQuarticSurfacesandSextic CurveswithSingularities of Type $E_{8}$,
$T_{2.3.7},$ $E_{2}$ . Publ. RIMS. Kyoto Univ. 20, 1185-1245 (1984)
[10] Urabe,Tohsuke: Dynkin Graphs andCombinations ofSingularities
on
Quartic Surfaces.Proc.Japan Acad. 61 Ser.A No. 8,
266-269
(1985)[11] Urabe,Tohsuke: Singularities inaCertain Class ofQuartic Surfaces andSextic Curves andDynkin Graphs. Canad. Math. Soc. Conf. Proc. 6,
477-497
(1986)[12] Urabe,Tohsuke: ElementaryTransformations of Dynkin Graphs and Singularities
on
QuarticSurfaces.Invent. Math. 87,
549-572
(1987)[13] Urabe,Tohsuke: Combinations of Rational Singularities
on
PlaneSextic Curveswith the Sum of MilnorNumbers Less than Sixteen. Banach Center Publications 20, Singularities,429-456:
PWN-Polish Scientific Publishers,Warsaw(1988)[14] Urabe, Tohsuke: Dynkin Graphs andCombinations of Singularities
on
Plane Sextic Curves. Contemporary Math.90, Singularities (R.Randeled.),American Math. Soc., Providence,Rhode Island295-316
(1989)[15] Urabe,Tohsuke:Tie Transformations of Dynkin Graphs and Singularities
on
QuarticSurfaces. Invent. Math. 100,
207-230
(1990)[16] Urabe, Tohsuke:Dynkin Graphs andQuadrilateral Singularities. Manuscript of
a
Book(1990)
[17] Wang, Ming: Rational Double Points
on
SexticK3 Surfaces. Thesis, Fudan University, China(1991)[18] Yang,Jin-Gen: Rational DoublePoints
on a
NormalQuintic K3 Surface. Preprint, Institute of Mathematics Fudan University, China(1991)Tokyo 192-03,Japan