• 検索結果がありません。

ON OPEN PROBLEMS OF F. QI

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "ON OPEN PROBLEMS OF F. QI"

Copied!
16
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

On Open Problems of F. Qi B. Belaïdi, A. El Farissi and

Z. Latreuch vol. 10, iss. 3, art. 90, 2009

Title Page

Contents

JJ II

J I

Page1of 16 Go Back Full Screen

Close

ON OPEN PROBLEMS OF F. QI

BENHARRAT BELAÏDI, ABDALLAH EL FARISSI AND ZINELAÂBIDINE LATREUCH

Department of Mathematics

Laboratory of Pure and Applied Mathematics University of Mostaganem

B. P. 227 Mostaganem, Algeria

EMail:[email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Received: 07 May, 2008

Accepted: 28 September, 2009 Communicated by: S.S. Dragomir 2000 AMS Sub. Class.: 26D15.

Key words: Inequality, Sum of power, Exponential of sum, Nonnegative sequence, Integral Inequality.

Abstract: In this paper, we give a complete answer to Problem 1 and a partial answer to Problem 2 posed by F. Qi in [2] and we propose an open problem.

Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank the referees for their helpful remarks and sug- gestions to improve the paper.

(2)

On Open Problems of F. Qi B. Belaïdi, A. El Farissi and

Z. Latreuch vol. 10, iss. 3, art. 90, 2009

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page2of 16 Go Back Full Screen

Close

Contents

1 Introduction 3

2 Lemmas 9

3 Proofs of the Theorems 12

4 Open Problem 15

(3)

On Open Problems of F. Qi B. Belaïdi, A. El Farissi and

Z. Latreuch vol. 10, iss. 3, art. 90, 2009

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page3of 16 Go Back Full Screen

Close

1. Introduction

Before, we state our results, for our own convenience, we introduce the following notations:

(1.1) [0,∞)n= [0,4 ∞)×[0,∞)×...×[0,∞)

| {z }

ntimes

and

(1.2) (0,∞)n= (0,4 ∞)×(0,∞)×...×(0,∞)

| {z }

ntimes

forn ∈N,whereNdenotes the set of all positive integers.

In [2], F. Qi proved the following:

Theorem A. For(x1, x2, . . . , xn)∈[0,∞)nandn >2,inequality

(1.3) e2

4

n

X

i=1

x2i 6exp

n

X

i=1

xi

!

is valid. Equality in(1.3)holds if xi = 2for some given1 6i6 nandxj = 0for all16j 6nwithj 6=i.Thus, the constant e42 in(1.3)is the best possible.

Theorem B. Let{xi}i=1 be a nonnegative sequence such thatP

i=1xi <∞. Then

(1.4) e2

4

X

i=1

x2i 6exp

X

i=1

xi

! .

Equality in(1.4)holds ifxi = 2for some giveni∈Nandxj = 0for allj ∈Nwith j 6=i.Thus, the constant e42 in(1.4)is the best possible.

(4)

On Open Problems of F. Qi B. Belaïdi, A. El Farissi and

Z. Latreuch vol. 10, iss. 3, art. 90, 2009

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page4of 16 Go Back Full Screen

Close

In the same paper, F. Qi posed the following two open problems:

Problem 1.1. For(x1, x2, ..., xn)∈[0,∞)nandn >2,determine the best possible constantsαn, λn ∈Randβn >0, µn <∞such that

(1.5) βn

n

X

i=1

xαin 6exp

n

X

i=1

xi

!

≤µn

n

X

i=1

xλin.

Problem 1.2. What is the integral analogue of the double inequality(1.5)?

Recently, Huan-Nan Shi gave a partial answer in [3] to Problem1.1. The main purpose of this paper is to give a complete answer to this problem. Also, we give a partial answer to Problem1.2. The method used in this paper will be quite different from that in the proofs of Theorem 1.1 of [2] and Theorem 1 of [3]. For some related results, we refer the reader to [1]. We will prove the following results.

Theorem 1.1. Let p > 1 be a real number. For (x1, x2, . . . , xn) ∈ [0,∞)n and n>2,the inequality

(1.6) ep

pp

n

X

i=1

xpi 6exp

n

X

i=1

xi

!

is valid. Equality in(1.6)holds ifxi =pfor some given1 6i 6 nandxj = 0for all16j 6nwithj 6=i.Thus, the constant eppp in(1.6)is the best possible.

Theorem 1.2. Let0< p 61be a real number. For(x1, x2, . . . , xn)∈[0,∞)nand n>2,the inequality

(1.7) np−1ep

pp

n

X

i=1

xpi 6exp

n

X

i=1

xi

!

(5)

On Open Problems of F. Qi B. Belaïdi, A. El Farissi and

Z. Latreuch vol. 10, iss. 3, art. 90, 2009

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page5of 16 Go Back Full Screen

Close

is valid. Equality in (1.7) holds if xi = pn for all 1 6 i 6 n. Thus, the constant np−1pepp in(1.7)is the best possible.

Theorem 1.3. Let{xi}i=1 be a nonnegative sequence such thatP

i=1xi < ∞and p>1be a real number. Then

(1.8) ep

pp

X

i=1

xpi 6exp

X

i=1

xi

! .

Equality in(1.8)holds ifxi =pfor some giveni∈Nandxj = 0for allj ∈Nwith j 6=i.Thus, the constant pepp in(1.8)is the best possible.

Remark 1. In general, we cannot find0< µn <∞andλn∈Rsuch that exp

n

X

i=1

xi

! 6µn

n

X

i=1

xλin.

Proof. We suppose that there exists0< µn <∞andλn∈Rsuch that exp

n

X

i=1

xi

! 6µn

n

X

i=1

xλin.

Then for(x1,1, ...,1), we obtain asx1 →+∞, 16e1−nµn n−1 +xλ1n

e−x1 →0.

This is a contradiction.

(6)

On Open Problems of F. Qi B. Belaïdi, A. El Farissi and

Z. Latreuch vol. 10, iss. 3, art. 90, 2009

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page6of 16 Go Back Full Screen

Close

Theorem 1.4. Let p > 0be a real number,(x1, x2, . . . , xn) ∈ [0,∞)n andn > 2 such that0< xi 6pfor all16i6n. Then the inequality

(1.9) exp

n

X

i=1

xi

! 6 pp

nenp

n

X

i=1

x−pi

is valid. Equality in(1.9)holds ifxi =pfor all16i6n. Thus, the constant pnpenp is the best possible.

Remark 2. Letp > 0be a real number, (x1, x2, . . . , xn) ∈ [0,∞)n andn > 2such that0< xi 6pfor all16i6n. Then

(i) if 0< p≤1,we have

(1.10) np−1ep pp

n

X

i=1

xpi 6exp

n

X

i=1

xi

! 6 pp

n enp

n

X

i=1

x−pi ;

(ii) if p≥1,we have

(1.11) ep

pp

n

X

i=1

xpi 6exp

n

X

i=1

xi

! 6 pp

nenp

n

X

i=1

x−pi .

Remark 3. Takingp= 2in Theorems1.1and1.3easily leads to TheoremsAandB respectively.

Remark 4. Inequality(1.6)can be rewritten as either

(1.12) ep

pp

n

X

i=1

xpi 6

n

Y

i=1

exi

(7)

On Open Problems of F. Qi B. Belaïdi, A. El Farissi and

Z. Latreuch vol. 10, iss. 3, art. 90, 2009

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page7of 16 Go Back Full Screen

Close

or

(1.13) ep

pp kxkpp 6expkxk1, wherex= (x1, x2, ..., xn)andk·kp denotes thep-norm.

Remark 5. Inequality(1.8)can be rewritten as

(1.14) ep

pp

X

i=1

xpi 6

Y

i=1

exi

which is equivalent to inequality(1.12)forx= (x1, x2, ...)∈[0,∞). Remark 6. Takingxi = 1i fori∈Nin(1.6)and rearranging gives

(1.15) p−plnp+ ln

n

X

i=1

1 ip

! 6

n

X

i=1

1 i.

Takingxi = i1s fori∈Nands >1in(1.8)and rearranging gives (1.16) p−plnp+ ln

X

i=1

1 ips

!

=p−plnp+ lnς(ps)6

X

i=1

1

is =ς(s), whereς denotes the well-known Riemann Zêta function.

In the following, we give a partial answer to Problem1.2.

Theorem 1.5. Let0 < p 6 1be a real number, and letf be a continuous function on[a, b].Then the inequality

(1.17) ep

pp (b−a)p−1 Z b

a

|f(x)|pdx≤exp Z b

a

|f(x)|dx

(8)

On Open Problems of F. Qi B. Belaïdi, A. El Farissi and

Z. Latreuch vol. 10, iss. 3, art. 90, 2009

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page8of 16 Go Back Full Screen

Close

is valid. Equality in(1.17)holds iff(x) = b−ap . Thus, the constant eppp(b−a)p−1 in (1.17)is the best possible.

Theorem 1.6. Letx >0.Then

(1.18) Γ(x)6 2x+1xx−1

ex

is valid, whereΓdenotes the well-known Gamma function.

(9)

On Open Problems of F. Qi B. Belaïdi, A. El Farissi and

Z. Latreuch vol. 10, iss. 3, art. 90, 2009

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page9of 16 Go Back Full Screen

Close

2. Lemmas

Lemma 2.1. Forx∈[0,∞)andp >0,the inequality

(2.1) ep

ppxp 6ex

is valid. Equality in (2.1) holds if x = p. Thus, the constant pepp in (2.1) is the best possible.

Proof. Letting f(x) = plnx −x on the set (0,∞), it is easy to obtain that the function f has a maximal point at x = p and the maximal value equals f(p) = plnp−p.Then, we obtain(2.1). It is clear that the inequality (2.1) also holds at x= 0.

Lemma 2.2. Letp >0be a real number. For(x1, x2, . . . , xn)∈[0,∞)nandn>2, we have:

(i) Ifp>1,then the inequality

(2.2)

n

X

i=1

xpi 6

n

X

i=1

xi

!p

is valid.

(ii) If0< p 61,then inequality

(2.3) np−1

n

X

i=1

xpi 6

n

X

i=1

xi

!p

is valid.

(10)

On Open Problems of F. Qi B. Belaïdi, A. El Farissi and

Z. Latreuch vol. 10, iss. 3, art. 90, 2009

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page10of 16 Go Back Full Screen

Close

Proof. (i) For the proof, we use mathematical induction. First, we prove (2.2) for n= 2.We have for any(x1, x2)6= (0,0)

(2.4) x1

x1+x2 ≤1 and x2

x1+x2 ≤1.

Then, byp>1we get (2.5)

x1 x1+x2

p

6 x1

x1+x2 and

x2 x1+x2

p

6 x2 x1+x2. By addition from(2.5),we obtain

x1

x1+x2 p

+

x2

x1 +x2 p

6 x1

x1+x2 + x2

x1+x2. So,

(2.6) xp1+xp2 6(x1+x2)p. It is clear that inequality(2.6)holds also at the point(0,0).

Now we suppose that (2.7)

n

X

i=1

xpi 6

n

X

i=1

xi

!p

and we prove that (2.8)

n+1

X

i=1

xpi 6

n+1

X

i=1

xi

!p

.

(11)

On Open Problems of F. Qi B. Belaïdi, A. El Farissi and

Z. Latreuch vol. 10, iss. 3, art. 90, 2009

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page11of 16 Go Back Full Screen

Close

We have by(2.6) (2.9)

n+1

X

i=1

xi

!p

=

n

X

i=1

xi+xn+1

!p

>

n

X

i=1

xi

!p

+xpn+1

and by(2.7)and(2.9),we obtain (2.10)

n+1

X

i=1

xpi =

n

X

i=1

xpi +xpn+1 6

n

X

i=1

xi

!p

+xpn+1 6

n+1

X

i=1

xi

!p

.

Then for alln>2,(2.2)holds.

(ii) For(x1, x2, . . . , xn)∈[0,∞)n,0< p 61andn >2,we have (2.11)

n

X

i=1

xi

!p

=

n

X

i=1

nxi n

!p

.

By using the concavity of the functionx7→xp (x>0, 0< p 61),we obtain from (2.11)

(2.12)

n

X

i=1

xi

!p

=

n

X

i=1

nxi n

!p

>

n

X

i=1

npxpi

n =np−1

n

X

i=1

xpi.

Hence(2.3)holds.

(12)

On Open Problems of F. Qi B. Belaïdi, A. El Farissi and

Z. Latreuch vol. 10, iss. 3, art. 90, 2009

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page12of 16 Go Back Full Screen

Close

3. Proofs of the Theorems

We are now in a position to prove our theorems.

Proof of Theorem1.1. For (x1, x2, . . . , xn) ∈ [0,∞)n and p > 1, we put x = Pn

i=1xi. Then by(2.1),we have

(3.1) ep

pp

n

X

i=1

xi

!p

6exp

n

X

i=1

xi

!

and by(2.2)we obtain(1.6).

Proof of Theorem1.2. For(x1, x2, . . . , xn) ∈ [0,∞)n and0 < p 6 1,we putx = Pn

i=1xi. Then by(2.1),we have

(3.2) ep

pp

n

X

i=1

xi

!p

6exp

n

X

i=1

xi

!

and by(2.3)we obtain(1.7).

Proof of Theorem1.3. This can be concluded by lettingn →+∞ in Theorem 1.1.

Proof of Theorem1.4. By the condition of Theorem1.4, we have0< xi 6pfor all 1 6 i 6 n. Then, x−pi > p−p for all1 6 i 6 n. It follows thatPn

i=1x−pi > np−p. Then we obtain

(3.3)

n

X

i=1

xi−ln

n

X

i=1

x−pi

!

6np−ln np−p

=np+ ln 1

n +plnp.

(13)

On Open Problems of F. Qi B. Belaïdi, A. El Farissi and

Z. Latreuch vol. 10, iss. 3, art. 90, 2009

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page13of 16 Go Back Full Screen

Close

It follows that

exp

n

X

i=1

xi

! 6 pp

nenp

n

X

i=1

x−pi . The proof of Theorem1.4is completed.

Proof of Theorem1.5. Let0< p61.By Hölder’s inequality, we have (3.4)

Z b

a

|f(x)|pdx6 Z b

a

|f(x)|dx p

(b−a)1−p.

It follows that

(3.5) (b−a)p−1

Z b

a

|f(x)|pdx6 Z b

a

|f(x)|dx p

.

On the other hand, by Lemma2.1, we have

(3.6) ep

pp Z b

a

|f(x)|dx p

≤exp Z b

a

|f(x)|dx

.

By(3.5)and(3.6),we get(1.17).

Proof of Theorem1.6. Letx >0andt >0. Then by Lemma2.1, we have

(3.7) et > ex

xxtx. So,

(3.8) e−t > ex

xxtxe−2t.

(14)

On Open Problems of F. Qi B. Belaïdi, A. El Farissi and

Z. Latreuch vol. 10, iss. 3, art. 90, 2009

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page14of 16 Go Back Full Screen

Close

It is clear that

(3.9) 1> ex

xx Z

0

txe−2tdt = ex

2x+1xx−1Γ(x).

The proof of Theorem1.6is completed.

(15)

On Open Problems of F. Qi B. Belaïdi, A. El Farissi and

Z. Latreuch vol. 10, iss. 3, art. 90, 2009

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page15of 16 Go Back Full Screen

Close

4. Open Problem

Problem 4.1. Forp≥1a real number, determine the best possible constantα ∈R such that

ep ppα

Z b

a

|f(x)|pdx≤exp Z b

a

|f(x)|dx

.

(16)

On Open Problems of F. Qi B. Belaïdi, A. El Farissi and

Z. Latreuch vol. 10, iss. 3, art. 90, 2009

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Page16of 16 Go Back Full Screen

Close

References

[1] Y. MIAO, L.-M. LIUANDF. QI, Refinements of inequalities between the sum of squares and the exponential of sum of a nonnegative sequence, J. Inequal. Pure and Appl. Math., 9(2) (2008), Art. 53. [ONLINE:http://jipam.vu.edu.

au/article.php?sid=985].

[2] F. QI, Inequalities between the sum of squares and the exponential of sum of a nonnegative sequence, J. Inequal. Pure Appl. Math., 8(3) (2007), Art. 78. [ON- LINE:http://jipam.vu.edu.au/article.php?sid=895].

[3] H.N. SHI, Solution of an open problem proposed by Feng Qi, RGMIA Research Report Collection, 10(4) (2007), Art. 9. [ONLINE: http://www.staff.

vu.edu.au/RGMIA/v10n4.asp].

参照

関連したドキュメント

To prove the main results of this article we reformulate problem (2) in an abstract way which allows us to apply the Leray-Schauder degree.. Our existence conditions require f to

Abstract: In this paper we give a complete isomorphical classification of free topological groups F M (X ) of locally compact zero-dimensional separable metric

In 2, the regularity of weak solutions to the characteristic BVP 1.2-1.3 was studied, under the assumption that the problem is strongly L 2 -well posed, namely, that a unique L

Problem A Are all countably paracompact subspaces of $\omega_{1}^{2}$ normal. An partial positive

Abstract This paper surveys the recent progress on the graph algorithms for solving network connectivity problems such as the extreme set problem, the cactus representation

Abstract In this paper, we first propose three practical algorithms for linear complementarity problems, which are based on the polynomial time method of

In this paper we propose practical algorithms for solving the nonlinear minimum cost network flow problem which has many fields of application such

Abstract This paper proposes a cutting plane algorithm for solving 0-1 bilinear knapsack problem (BK), a special kind of integer quadratic programming problem in