• 検索結果がありません。

1IntroductionandPreliminaries ANoteonBestApproximationandQuasiconvexMultimaps

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "1IntroductionandPreliminaries ANoteonBestApproximationandQuasiconvexMultimaps"

Copied!
5
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

A Note on Best Approximation and Quasiconvex Multimaps

Una Nota sobre Mejor Aproximaci´on y Aplicaciones Cuasiconvexas

Zoran D. Mitrovi´c

Faculty of Electrical Engineering University of Banja Luka 78000 Banja Luka, Patre 5

Bosnia and Herzegovina E-mail address: [email protected]

Abstract

In this paper, using the methods of the KKM theory and the new notion of the measure of quasiconvexity, we prove a result on the best approximation for multimaps. As an application, a coincidence point result is also given.

Key words and phrases: best approximation, KKM map, coinci- dence point.

Resumen

En este art´ıculo, usando los m´etodos de la teor´ıa KKM y la nueva noci´on de la medida de cuasiconvexidad, probamos un resultado sobre la mejor aproximaci´on para multiaplicaciones. Como aplicaci´on, tambi´en se da un resultado sobre punto de coincidencia.

Palabras y frases clave:mejor aproximaci´on, aplicaci´on KKM, punto de coincidencia.

1 Introduction and Preliminaries

Using the methods of the KKM theory, see for example [3, 4], and the notion of the measure of quasiconvexity, we prove in this short paper a result on the

Received 2005/06/13. Revised 2006/08/13. Accepted 2006/08/20.

MSC (2000): Primary 47H10; Secondary 54H25.

(2)

best approximations for multimaps.

Let F : X 2Y be a multimap or map, where 2Y denotes the set of all nonempty subsets of Y. ForA⊂X, let

F(A) =∪{F(x) :x∈A}.

For anyB ⊂Y, the lower inverse of B underF defined by F(B) ={x∈X:F(x)∩B6=∅}.

LetX be a normed space with norm|| · ||. For any nonnegative real number r and any subsetAofX, we define ther−parallel set ofAas

A+r=∪{B[a, r] :a∈A}, where

B[a, r] ={x∈X:||a−x|| ≤r}.

IfA is a nonempty subset ofX we define

||A||= inf{||a||:a∈A}.

For bounded and closed subsetsAandBofX, the Hausdorff distance, denoted byH(A, B), is defined by

H(A, B) = max{D(A, B), D(B, A)}, where

D(A, B) = sup

y∈A

x∈Binf ||x−y||.

LetCbe a subset ofX, a mapF :C→2X is called quasiconvex (see for example K. Nikodem [2]) if and only if it satisfies the condition

F(xi)∩S6=∅, i= 1,2⇒F(λx1+ (1−λ)x2)∩S6=∅, for all convex setsS⊂Y,x1, x2∈C andλ∈[0,1].

Remark 1. A mapF :C→2X is quasiconvex if and only if the setF(S) is convex for each convex setS⊆X.

Definition 1. LetX and Y be normed spaces and F : X 2Y. The real number mq(F), defined by

mq(F) = inf{r >0 :co(F(S))⊆F(S+r) for all convexS ⊆Y} is called a measure of quasiconvexity for map F.

(3)

Remark 2. 1. IfF is quasiconvex map thenmq(F) = 0.

2. If αis a real number thenmq(αF) =|α|mq(F).

A mapF :C→2X is called a KKM-map ifco(A)⊂F(A) for each finite subsetAofC.

The following KKM-theorem [1], will be used to prove the main result of this paper.

Theorem 1. Let X be a vector topological space, C a nonempty subset ofX and T : C 2X a KKM-map with closed values. If T(x)is compact for at least one x∈C then T

x∈C

T(x)6=∅.

2 A Best Approximation Theorem

Theorem 2. LetX be a normed space,C a nonempty convex compact subset ofX,F :C→2X, G:C→2X continuous maps with convex compact values.

Then there exists y0∈C such that

||G(y0)−F(y0)|| ≤ inf

x∈C||G(x)−F(y0)||+mq(G).

Proof. Let for everyx∈C, T :C→2C be defined by

T(x) ={y∈C:||G(y)−F(y)|| ≤ ||G(x)−F(y)||+mq(G)}.

The mappingsF andGare continuous, hence they are continuous in Hausdorff distance too. From inequality

| ||A|| − ||B|| | ≤H(A, B),

for each bounded and closed subsets A, BandC ofX, it follows thatT(x) is closed. SinceCis compact we have thatT(x) is compact for eachx∈C. We can prove that T is a KKM mapping, i. e. that for every{x1, . . . , xn} ⊂C

co{x1, . . . , xn} ⊂ [n

i=1

T(xi) (1)

If (1) does not hold, there exists y= Pn

i=1

λixi,whereλi0, i= 1, . . . , nand Pn

i=1

λi= 1 so thaty /∈ Sn

i=1

T(xi).Then there is

||G(y)−F(y)||>||G(xi)−F(y)||+mq(G) for everyi= 1, . . . , n.

(4)

Sets G(x) andF(x) are compact, then there existu0i ∈G(xi)−F(y), i= 1, . . . , n,such that

||u0i||=||G(xi)−F(y)||.

LetS=co{u01, . . . , u0n}.Then we have

(G(xi)−F(y))∩S6=∅andxi∈G(F(y) +S),

for everyi= 1, . . . , n.Since the setF(y)+Sis convex andmq(G) is a measure of quasiconvexity, we have

y∈G(F(y) +S+mq(G) +²) for each² >0, therefore

G(y)∩(F(y) +S+mq(G) +²)6=∅.

We obtain that there exists

v∈(G(y)−F(y))(S+mq(G) +²),

hence theres∈S andb∈X such that||b|| ≤mq(G) +²andv=s+b.Since s∈S there existµi0, i= 1, . . . , nand Pn

i=1

µi= 1 such that s=Pn

i=1

µiu0i. We have

||G(y)−F(y)|| ≤ ||v|| ≤ ||s||+||b||=||

Xn

i=1

µiu0i||+||b|| ≤

Xn i=1

µi||u0i||+mq(G) +²≤ max

1≤i≤n||G(xi)−F(y)||+mq(G) +².

This contradicts

||G(y)−F(y)||>||G(xi)−F(y)||+mq(G) for everyi= 1, . . . , n, and so T is a KKM mapping. From Theorem 1. T

x∈C

T(x)6=∅ and so there exists y0∈C such that

||G(y0)−F(y0)|| ≤ inf

x∈C||G(x)−F(y0)||+mq(G).

Corollary 1. Let C be a nonempty convex compact subset of normed space X andF, G:C→2X continuous maps with convex compact values.

(5)

1. IfG is quasiconvex then there existsy0∈C such that

||G(y0)−F(y0)||= inf

x∈C||G(x)−F(y0)||.

2. If for every x∈C, F(x)∩G(C)6=∅then there exists y0∈C such that

||G(y0)−F(y0)|| ≤mq(G).

3. If G is a quasiconvex mapping and for every x∈C, F(x)∩G(C)6=∅ then there existsy0∈C such that

G(y0)∩F(y0)6=∅.

Remark 3. If G(x) = {x} and F(x) = {f(x)}, x C, where f continuous function Theorem 2. reduces to well-known best approximations theorem of Ky Fan [1].

References

[1] Fan K. A Generalization of Tychonoff’s Fixed Point Theorem, Math.

Annalen,142(1961), 305–310.

[2] Nikodem, K.K-Convex and K-Concave Set-Valued Functions, Politech- nika, Lodzka, 1989.

[3] Singh S., Watson B. and Srivastava P. Fixed Point Theory and Best Approximation: The KKM-map Principle, Kluwer Academic Press, 1997.

[4] Yuan G. X. Z. KKM Theory and Applications in Nonlinear Analysis, Marcel Dekker, New York, 1999.

参照

関連したドキュメント

We report analytical methods for server log and application of the result of analysis to a security measure. An illegal access information was collected by a honey pot as well as

“Application of second-order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory with resolution-of-identity approximation to periodic

In this work, we introduce a new notion called concept similarity measure under preference profile with a set of for- mally defined properties in Description Logics.. This

In order to prove our main result we need the theory of Löewner chains; we recall the basic result of this theory, from Pommerenke.. Theorem

In this paper, we build a new inequality similar to Hilbert’s inequality with a best constant factor.. As an application, we consider its

Basing on the notion of a measure of noncompactness in Banach space, we prove the existence of mild solutions of the equation considered.. Additionally, the applicability of the

The first part of his contributions to approximation theory, which consists of about 130 papers, were mostly devoted to understanding different aspects of best approximation

Nair, On metric diophantine approximation theory and subsequence ergodic theory, New York Journal of Mathematics 3A (1998), 117{124.