• 検索結果がありません。

ACTA UNIVERSITATIS APULENSIS No 11/2006 Proceedings of the

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "ACTA UNIVERSITATIS APULENSIS No 11/2006 Proceedings of the"

Copied!
12
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Mathematics and Informatics ICTAMI 2005 - Alba Iulia, Romania

ON A CLASS OF α-CONVEX FUNCTIONS

Mugur Acu

Abstract. In this paper we define a general class of α-convex functions with respect to a convex domain D contained in the right half plane by using a generalized S˘al˘agean operator introduced by F.M. Al-Oboudi in [5] and we give some properties of this class.

2000 Mathematical Subject Classification: 30C45

Key words and phrases: α-convex functions, Libera-Pascu integral opera- tor, Briot-Bouquet differential subordination, generalized S˘al˘agean operator

1.Introduction

Let H(U) be the set of functions which are regular in the unit disc U, A ={f ∈ H(U) :f(0) =f0(0)−1 = 0}, Hu(U) ={f ∈ H(U) :f is univalent in U} and S ={f ∈A:f is univalent in U}.

Let Dn be the S˘al˘agean differential operator ([10]) defined as:

Dn :A→A, n∈N and

D0f(z) = f(z) D1f(z) =Df(z) = zf0(z)

Dnf(z) = D(Dn−1f(z)).

Remark 1.1Iff ∈S, f(z) =z+P

j=2

ajzj, j = 2,3, ...,z ∈U thenDnf(z) = z+

P

j=2

jnajzj.

The aim of this paper is to define a general class of α-convex functions with respect to a convex domain D contained in the right half plane by using a generalized S˘al˘agean operator introduced by F.M. Al-Oboudi in[5] and to obtain some leftoperties of this class.

(2)

2.Preliminary results

We recall here the definitions of the well - known classes of starlike func- tions, convex functions and α-convex functions (see [6])

S =

(

f ∈A: Rezf0(z)

f(z) >0, z∈U

)

,

Sc =CV =K =

(

f ∈H(U); f(0) =f0(0)−1 = 0, Re

(

1 + zf00(z) f0(z)

)

>0, z ∈U

)

,

Mα ={f ∈H(U), f(0) =f0(0)−1 = 0,ReJ(α, f;z)>0, z∈U , α∈R}

where

J(α, f;z) = (1−α)zf0(z)

f(z) +α 1 + zf00(z) f0(z)

!

We observe that M0 = S and M1 =Sc where S and Sc are the class of starlike functions, respectively the class of convex functions.

Remark 2.1. By using the subordination relation, we may define the class Mα thus if f(z) = z +a2z2 +..., z ∈ U, then f ∈ Mα if and only if J(α, f;z)≺ 1+z1−z, z ∈U, where by ”≺” we denote the subordination relation.

Let consider the Libera-Pascu integral operator Lα :A→A defined as:

f(z) = LαF(z) = 1 +a za

z

Z

0

F(t)·ta−1dt, α∈C ,Reα ≥0. (1) In the case a = 1,2,3, ... this operator was introduced by S. D. Bernardi and it was studied by many authors in different general cases.

Definition 2.1.[5]Letn ∈Nandλ≥0. We denote withDλnthe operator defined by

Dλn:A→A ,

D0λf(z) = f(z), D1λf(z) = (1−λ)f(z) +λzf0(z) =Dλf(z), Dnλf(z) = DλDn−1λ f(z).

(3)

Remark 2.2.[5] We observe that Dnλ is a linear operator and for f(z) = z+

P

j=2

ajzj we have

Dnλf(z) = z+

X

j=2

(1 + (j −1)λ)najzj.

Also, it is easy to observe that if we consider λ= 1 in the above definition we obtain the S˘al˘agean differential operator.

Definition 2.2 [3]Letq(z)∈ Hu(U), with q(0) = 1 andq(U) = D, where D is a convex domain contained in the right half plane, n ∈N and λ≥0. We say that a function f(z)∈A is in the class SLn(q) if D

n+1 λ f(z)

Dnλf(z) ≺q(z), z ∈U. Remark 2.3. Geometric interpretation: f(z) ∈ SLn(q) if and only if

Dλn+1f(z)

Dλnf(z) take all values in the convex domain D contained in the right half- plane.

Definition 2.3 [4]Letq(z)∈ Hu(U), with q(0) = 1 andq(U) = D, where D is a convex domain contained in the right half plane, n ∈N and λ≥0. We say that a function f(z)∈A is in the class SLcn(q) if D

n+2 λ f(z)

Dn+1λ f(z) ≺q(z), z ∈U. Remark 2.4. Geometric interpretation: f(z) ∈ SLcn(q) if and only if

Dλn+2f(z)

Dλn+1f(z) take all values in the convex domain D contained in the right half- plane.

The next theorem is result of the so called ”admissible functions method”

introduced by P.T. Mocanu and S.S. Miller (see [7], [8], [9]).

Theorem 2.1. Let h convex in U and Re[βh(z) + γ] > 0, z ∈ U. If p ∈ H(U) with p(0) = h(0) and p satisfied the Briot-Bouquet differential subordination

p(z) + zp0(z)

βp(z) +γ ≺h(z), then p(z)≺h(z).

(4)

3. Main results

Definition 3.1 Letq(z)∈ Hu(U), withq(0) = 1, q(U) =D, where Dis a convex domain contained in the right half plane, n ∈N, λ ≥0 and α ∈[0,1].

We say that a function f(z)∈A is in the class M Ln,α(q) if Jn,λ(α, f;z) = (1−α)Dn+1λ f(z)

Dnλf(z) +αDλn+2f(z)

Dλn+1f(z) ≺q(z), z ∈U.

Remark 3.1 Geometric interpretation: f(z) ∈ M Ln,α(q) if and only if Jn,λ(α, f;z) take all values in the convex domain D contained in the right half-plane.

Remark 3.2 It is easy to observe that if we choose different function q(z) we obtain variously classes of α-convex functions, such as (for example), for λ = 1 and n = 0, the class of α-convex functions, the class of α-uniform convex functions with respect to a convex domain (see [2]), and, for λ = 1, the class U Dn,α(β, γ), β ≥ 0, γ ∈ [−1,1), β+γ ≥ 0 (see [1]), the class of α-n-uniformly convex functions with respect to a convex domain (see [2]).

Remark 3.3 We have M Ln,0(q) =SLn(q) and M Ln,1(q) =SLcn(q).

Remark 3.4 For q1(z) ≺ q2(z) we have M Ln,α(q1) ⊂ M Ln,α(q2). From the above we obtain M Ln,α(q)⊂M Ln,α

1+z 1−z

Theorem 3.1 For all α, α0 ∈ [0,1], with α < α0, we have M Ln,α0(q) ⊂ M Ln,α(q).

Proof. From f(z)∈M Ln,α0(q) we have Jn,λ(α, f;z) = (1−α)Dn+1λ f(z)

Dnλf(z) +αDλn+2f(z)

Dλn+1f(z) ≺q(z), (2) where q(z) is univalent in U with q(0) = 1 and maps the unit discU into the convex domain D contained in the right half-plane.

With notation

p(z) = Dn+1λ f(z) Dnλf(z)

(5)

where

p(z) = 1 +p1z+. . . andf(z) = z+

X

j=2

ajzj

we have

p(z) +α0λ· zp0(z) p(z) =

= Dλn+1f(z)

Dλnf(z) +α0λ Dλnf(z) Dn+1λ f(z) ·z

Dλn+1f(z)0Dλnf(z)−Dn+1λ f(z) (Dnλf(z)0

(Dλnf(z))2 =

= Dλn+1f(z)

Dλnf(z) +α0λ Dλnf(z) Dλn+1f(z)

zDn+1λ f(z)0

Dλnf(z) − Dλn+1f(z)

Dλnf(z) · z(Dλnf(z)0 Dnλf(z)

=

= Dλn+1f(z)

Dλnf(z) +α0λ· Dλnf(z) Dλn+1f(z)

z z+

P

j=2

(1 + (j−1)λ)n+1ajzj

!0

Dλnf(z) −

− Dλn+1f(z) Dnλf(z) ·

z z+ P

j=2

(1 + (j−1)λ)najzj

!0

Dλnf(z)

=

= Dn+1λ f(z)

Dnλf(z) +α0λ· Dnλf(z) Dn+1λ f(z)

z 1 +

P

j=2

j(1 + (j−1)λ)n+1ajzj−1

!

Dλnf(z) −

− Dλn+1f(z) Dλnf(z) ·

z 1 + P

j=2

j(1 + (j−1)λ)najzj−1

!

Dλnf(z)

(6)

or

p(z)+α0·λ·zp(z)

p(z) = Dn+1λ f(z)

Dnλf(z) +α0λ· Dnλf(z) Dn+1λ f(z)

z+ P

j=2

j(1 + (j−1)λ)n+1ajzj Dλnf(z) −

− Dn+1λ f(z) Dnλf(z)

z+ P

j=2

j(1 + (j −1)λ)najzj Dnλf(z)

(3)

We have z+

X

j=2

j(1 + (j −1)λ)n+1ajzj =z+

X

j=2

((j−1) + 1) (1 + (j−1)λ)n+1ajzj =

=z+

X

j=2

(1 + (j−1)λ)n+1ajzj +

X

j=2

(j −1) (1 + (j−1)λ)n+1ajzj =

=z+Dn+1λ f(z)−z+

X

j=2

(j−1) (1 + (j−1)λ)n+1ajzj =

=Dλn+1f(z) + 1 λ

X

j=2

((j−1)λ) (1 + (j−1)λ)n+1ajzj =

=Dn+1λ f(z) + 1 λ

X

j=2

(1 + (j−1)λ−1) (1 + (j −1)λ)n+1ajzj =

=Dλn+1f(z)− 1 λ

X

j=2

(1 + (j −1)λ)n+1ajzj+ 1 λ

X

j=2

(1 + (j−1)λ)n+2ajzj =

=Dn+1λ f(z)− 1 λ

Dλn+1f(z)−z+ 1 λ

Dλn+2f(z)−z=

=Dn+1λ f(z)− 1

λDλn+1f(z) + z λ + 1

λDλn+2f(z)− z λ =

= λ−1

λ Dn+1λ f(z) + 1

λDλn+2f(z) =

(7)

= 1 λ

λ−1)Dλn+1f(z) +Dn+2λ f(z). Similarly we have

z+

X

j=2

j(1 + (j−1)λ)najzj = 1 λ

λ−1)Dλnf(z) +Dλn+1f(z).

From (3) we obtain

p(z) +α0·λ·zp0(z) p(z) =

= Dλn+1f(z)

Dλnf(z) +α0λ Dλnf(z) Dn+1λ f(z)

1

λ · (λ−1)Dn+1λ f(z) Dnλf(z) + +Dn+2λ f(z)

Dnλf(z) −Dn+1λ f(z)

Dλnf(z) (λ−1)− Dn+1λ f(z) Dnλf(z)

!2

=

= Dn+1λ f(z)

Dλnf(z) +α0Dn+2λ f(z)

Dn+1λ f(z) −α0Dn+1λ f(z) Dnλf(z) =

= Dn+1λ f(z)

Dnλf(z) (1−α0) +α0Dλn+2f(z)

Dλn+1f(z) =Jn,λ0, f;z) From (2) we have

p(z) + zp0(z)

1

α0λ ·p(z) ≺q(z)

with p(0) = q(0), Req(z) > 0, z ∈ U, α0 > 0 and λ ≥ 0. In this conditions from Theorem 2.1 we obtainp(z)≺q(z) or p(z) take all values in D.

If we consider the function g : [0, α0]→C, g(u) =p(z) +u· λzp0(z)

p(z) ,

with g(0) =p(z)∈D and g(α0) =Jn,λ0, f;z)∈D, it easy to see that g(α) =p(z) +α·λzp0(z)

p(z) ∈D,0≤α < α0. Thus we have

Jn,λ(α, f;z)≺q(z)

(8)

or

f(z)∈M Ln,α(q).

From the above theorem we have

Corollary 3.1 For every n∈N and α∈[0,1], we have M Ln,α(q)⊂M Ln,0(q) =SLn(q) .

Remark 3.5 If we consider λ = 1 and n = 0 we obtain the Theorem 3.1 from [2]. Also, for λ= 1 and n∈N, we obtain the Theorem 3.3 from [2].

Remark 3.6 If we consider λ = 1 and D = Dβ,γ (see [1] or [2]) in the above theorem we obtain the Theorem 3.1 from [1].

Theorem 3.2 Let n ∈ N, α ∈ [0,1] and λ ≥ 1. If F(z) ∈ M Ln,α(q) then f(z) =LaF(z) ∈SLn(q), where La is the Libera-Pascu integral operator defined by (1).

Proof.

From (1) we have

(1 +a)F(z) =af(z) +zf0(z)

and, by using the linear operator Dn+1λ and if we consider f(z) = Pj=2ajzj, we obtain

(1 +a)Dn+1λ F(z) = aDn+1λ f(z) +Dλn+1

z+

X

j=2

jajzj

=

=aDn+1λ f(z) +z+

X

j=2

(1 + (j−1)λ)n+1jajzj We have (see the proof of the above theorem)

z+

X

j=2

j(1 + (j−1)λ)n+1ajzj = 1 λ

λ−1)Dn+1λ f(z) +Dλn+2f(z) (4)

(9)

Thus

(1 +a)Dn+1λ F(z) =aDn+1λ f(z) + 1 λ

λ−1)Dn+1λ f(z) +Dλn+2f(z)=

= a+ λ−1 λ

!

Dn+1λ f(z) + 1

λDλn+2f(z) or

λ(1 +a)Dn+1λ F(z) = (a+ 1)λ−1)Dλn+1f(z) +Dn+2λ f(z).

Similarly, we obtain

λ(1 +a)DnλF(z) = (a+ 1)λ−1)Dλnf(z) +Dn+1λ f(z).

Then

Dn+1λ F(z) DλnF(z) =

Dn+2λ f(z)

Dn+1λ f(z)· DDn+1λn f(z)

λf(z) + ((a+ 1)λ−1)· DDn+1λn f(z) λf(z)

((a+ 1)λ−1) + D

n+1 λ f(z) Dnλf(z)

With notation

Dλn+1f(z)

Dnλf(z) =p(z), p(0) = 1 we obtain

Dn+1λ F(z) DnλF(z) =

Dn+2λ f(z)

Dn+1λ f(z) ·p(z) + (a+ 1)λ−1 ·p(z)

p(z) + (a+ 1)λ−1 (5) Also, we obtain

Dn+2λ f(z)

Dn+1λ f(z) = Dλn+2f(z)

Dλnf(z) · Dnλf(z)

Dn+1λ f(z) = 1

p(z)· Dn+2λ f(z)

Dnλf(z) (6) We have

Dλn+2f(z) Dnλf(z) =

z+ P

j=2

(1 + (j−1)λ)n+2ajzj z+ P

j=2

(1 + (j−1)λ)najzj and

(10)

zp0(z) = zDn+1λ f(z)0

Dnλf(z) − Dλn+1f(z)

Dλnf(z) · z(Dλnf(z))0 Dnλf(z) =

=

z 1 +

P

j=2

(1 + (j−1)λ)n+1jajzj−1

!

Dλnf(z) −

−p(z)· z1 +Pj=2(1 + (j−1)λ)njajzj−1 Dλnf(z)

or

zp0(z) = z+Pj=2j(1 + (j −1)λ)n+1ajzj

Dnλf(z) −p(z)·

z+ P

j=2

j(1 + (j −1)λ)najzj Dnλf(z) .

(7) By using (4) and (7) we obtain

zp0(z) = 1 λ

(λ−1)Dn+1λ f(z) +Dλn+2f(z)

Dnλf(z) −p(z)(λ−1)Dnλf(z) +Dλn+1f(z) Dnλf(z)

!

=

= 1

λ (λ−1)p(z) + Dn+2λ f(z)

Dnλf(z) −p(z)((λ−1) +p(z))

!

=

= 1 λ

Dλn+2f(z)

Dλnf(z) −p(z)2

!

Thus

λzp0(z) = Dn+2λ f(z)

Dnλf(z) −p(z)2 or

Dλn+2f(z)

Dλnf(z) =p(z)2+λzp0(z).

From (6) we obtain

Dn+2λ f(z) Dn+1λ f(z) = 1

p(z)(p(z)2+λzp0(z)).

(11)

Then, from (5), we obtain Dλn+1F(z)

DnλF(z) = p(z)2+λzp0(z) + ((a+ 1)λ−1)p(z)

p(z) + ((a+ 1)λ−1) =p(z)+λ zp0(z)

p(z) + ((a+ 1)λ−1) where α∈C, Rea ≥0 and λ≥1.

If we denote D

n+1 λ F(z)

DλnF(z) =h(z), withh(0) = 1, we have fromF(z)∈M Ln,α(q) (see the proof of the above Theorem):

Jn,λ(α, F;z) = h(z) +α·λ· zh0(z)

h(z) ≺q(z) Using the hypothesis, from Theorem 2.1, we obtain

h(z)≺q(z) or

p(z) +λ zp0(z)

p(z) + ((a+ 1)λ−1) ≺q(z).

By using the Theorem 2.1 and the hypothesis we have p(z)≺q(z)

or

Dn+1λ f(z)

Dnλf(z) ≺q(z).

This means f(z) =LαF(z)∈SLn(q).

Remark 3.7 If we consider λ = 1 and n = 0 we obtain the Theorem 3.2 from [2]. Also, for λ= 1 and n∈N, we obtain the Theorem 3.4 from [2].

Remark 3.8 If we consider λ = 1 and D = Dβ,γ ( see [1] or [2]) in the above theorem we obtain the Theorem 3.2 from [1].

References

(12)

[1]M. Acu, On a subclass of α-uniform convex functions, Archivum Math- ematicum, no. 2, Tomus 41/2005, (to appear).

[2]M. Acu, Some subclasses of α-uniformly convex functions, Acta Mathe- matica Academiae Paedagogicae Nyiregyhaziensis, Vol. 21(2005), (to appear).

[3]M. Acu, On a subclass of n-starlike functions, (to appear).

[4]M. Acu, On a subclass of n-convex functions, (to appear).

[5]F.M. Al-Oboudi,On univalent funtions defined by a generalized S’al’agean operator, Ind. J. Math. Math. Sci. 2004, no. 25-28, 1429-1436.

[6]P. Duren,Univalent functions, Springer Verlag, Berlin Heildelberg, 1984.

[7]S. S. Miller and P. T. Mocanu, Differential subordination and univalent functions, Mich. Math. 28(1981), 157-171.

[8]S. S. Miller and P. T. Mocanu, Univalent solution of Briot-Bouquet dif- ferential equation, J. Differential Equations 56(1985), 297-308.

[9]S. S. Miller and P. T. Mocanu, On some classes of first-order differential subordination, Mich. Math. 32(1985), 185-195.

[10]Gr. S˘al˘agean, On some classes of univalent functions, Seminar of geo- metric function theory, Cluj-Napoca, 1983.

Mugur Acu

University ”Lucian Blaga” of Sibiu Department of Mathematics

Str. Dr. I. Rat.iu, No. 5-7 550012 - Sibiu, Romania

E-mail address: acu [email protected]

参照

関連したドキュメント

[6] Boscaiu V., Liusnea D., Munteanu C., Pu¸scoi L., The impact of the exterior commerce and foreign direct investments upon the productivity in the processing industry, Romania’s

3.Manufacturing System Modelling by Using Petri Nets A Petri net is a graphic model of the oriented graph type, with two categories of nodes: places and transitions.. The

We chose Petri Nets to use for modeling a manufacturing enterprise, in fact the supply chain management process (SCM) that is sub- ject to unexpected events for which reactions

The steps of specification of the econometric model by using formalization and choosing the form of functions which describe the model, the selection and measurement of variables in

In many cases is very useful to know how probable is that the aggregate risk belongs to a certain neighbourhood of its expected value (as in the previous example).. Another field

We construct new Yang-Baxter systems from algebra and bialgebra

If (Z, S, A) is a Birkhoff interpolation scheme and if on each in- terpolation knot it is interpolated the same set of derivatives (A) then the resulted scheme is written (Z, S, A)

On the contrary, our conclusion is that, in various approaches [1] [3], [7], [8], regarding as applications active and semiactive suspensions and electrohydraulic servo