Transformations of a series in function fields (Analytic Number Theory and Related Areas)
全文
(2) 80. 2.1. The CarIitz. exponential function.. [n]=T^{q^{n}}-T. for n>0 and. by. which is entire. e(z). Let. .. Let. D_{0}=1, D_{n}=[n][n-1]^{q}\cdots[1]^{q^{n-1}} exponential function defined. be the Carlitz. e(z)=\displaystyle\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{z^{q^{n} {D_{n},. C_{\infty} By definition, it holds that de (z)/dz=e(z)=1 The map e:C_{\infty}\rightarrow C_{\infty} \mathrm{F}_{\mathrm{q} ‐linear and surjective. The kernel L :=\mathrm{K}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{r}(e) is a free A‐module of rank one. It is easy to see that e(z) is L‐periodic: e(z+l)=e(z) over. .. .. is. for l\in L Let \overline{$\pi$} denote .. From. this,. a. generator of L The function. e(z)=z\displaystyle \prod_{0\neq l\in L}(1-\frac{z}{l}). have. we. .. e(z). [4]. 2.2. The Dedekind. (inhomogeneous). When. c. is. sum.. Dedekind. for additionaJ details of. Let a, sum. c. s(a, c). unit of. A, s(a, c). sum. D(a, c). is defined to be. defined in. By replacing. $\mu$ with. if q>3.. $\epsilon \mu$( $\epsilon$\in \mathbb{F}_{q}\backslash \{0\}) 3. A SERIES. $\Omega$=C_{\infty}\backslash K_{\infty}. classical upper $\Omega$. zero.. This is. For any. The. an. analog of the. $\epsilon$\in \mathrm{F}_{q}\backslash \{0\},. .. in the definition of. s(a, c). we see. ,. that. s(a, c). be the Drinfeld upper half‐plane, which is an analog of the H :=\{z\in \mathbb{C}|{\rm Im}(z)>0\} The group GL_{2}(A) acts on. half‐plane. which is convergent for z\in $\Omega$. A_{+}. .. as. RELATED TO. .. by fractional linear transformations. where. (1.2).. as. .. coprime elements of A\backslash \{0\}. is defined. s( $\epsilon$ a, c)=$\epsilon$^{-1}s(a, c). (2.1). s(a, c)=0. e(z). s(a,c)=\displaystyle\frac{1}{c}\sum_{0\neq$\mu$\inA/cA}e(\frac{\overline{$\pi$}a$\mu$}{c})^{-1}e(\frac{\overline{$\pi$}$\mu$}{c})^{-1}. a. classical Dedekind. Let. be the. be written. .. \displaystyle \frac{1}{e(z)}=\frac{e(z)}{e(z)}=\sum_{l\in L}\frac{1}{l+z}.. The reader is referred to Goss. can. \left(\begin{ar ay}{l } a & b\ c & d \end{ar ay}\right)z=(az+b)f(cz+d). $\xi$(z)=\displaystyle\sum_{0\neqa\inA}\frac{1}{ae(\overline{$\pi$}az)}, .. This. can. be written. as. $\xi$(z)=\left\{ begin{ar y}{l 0&ifq>3,\ -\sum_{a\inA_{+}1/ae(\overline{$\pi$}az)&ifq=3,\ \sum_{a\inA+}1/ae(\overline{$\pi$}az)&ifq=2, \end{ar y}\right.. is the set of monic elements in A.. In the classical case, it is known that for. $\gamma$\in SL_{2}(\mathbb{Z}). and z\in H,. \displaystyle \log $\eta$( $\gamma$ z)-\log $\eta$(z)=-2 $\pi$ i\int_{z}^{ $\gamma$ z}G_{2}( $\tau$)d $\tau$,. .. Let.
(3) 81. where G have. a. 2 $\pi$ irnn $\tau$. ( $\tau$)=-\displaystyle \frac{1}{\mathrm{u}24}+\sum_{m=1}^{\infty}\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}ne,. is the Eisenstein series of weight 2. We. \mathrm{s}\mathrm{i}\mathrm{m}\mathrm{i}1\mathrm{a}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{r}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{s}1\mathrm{t}\mathrm{f}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{r} $\xi$(z). d $\xi$(z)/dz=\displaystyle \overline{ $\pi$}\sum_{a\in A+}e(\overline{ $\pi$}az)^{-2}. g(z) :=1-(T^{\mathrm{q} -T)\displaystyle \sum_{a\in A_{+} e(\overline{ $\pi$}az)^{1-\mathrm{q} is a weight q-1 modular (see [3], (9.2)). Therefore, we see that for $\gamma$\in GL_{2}(A) and Since de(z)/dz=1. As is well known, form for GL_{2}(A). z\in $\Omega$,. $\xi($\gam a$z)-$\xi(z)=\left{\begin{ar y}{l -\overlin{$\pi}\nt_{z}^$\gam a$z}\frac{g($\tau$)-1}{T^3}-Td\prime$\tau$&ifq=3,\ -\overlin{$\pi}\nt_{z}^$\gam a$z}(\frac{g($\tau$)-1}{T^2}-T)^{2}d$\tau$&ifq=2. \end{ar y}\right. $\xi$(z). 4. TRANSFORMATION FORMULA FOR. We. provide the results for the transformations for $\xi$(z). Proposition. (2). For. (1). 1.. For. $\epsilon$\in \mathrm{F}_{q}\backslash \{0\}, $\xi$( $\epsilon$ z)=$\epsilon$^{-1} $\xi$(z). $\gamma$=\left(\begin{ar ay}{l } a & b\ 0 & d \end{ar ay}\right)\in GL_{2}(A)_{2} $\xi$( $\gamma$ z)=\det $\gamma \xi$(z). .. .. .. Theorem 2. We have. where We. $\xi$(-1/z)= $\xi$(z)-\displaystyle \frac{ $\alpha$(2)}{\overline{ $\pi$} (z+\frac{1}{z})-\frac{ $\alpha$(1)^{2} {\overline{ $\pi$} ,. $\alpha$(n)=\displaystyle \sum_{0\neq a\in A}a^{-n}.. require the folowing lemma. Lemma 3. Let. $\gam a$=\left(\begin{ar y}{l a&b\ c&d \end{ar y}\right). be. a. to prove Theorem 4. matrix in. GL_{2}(A). with. c\neq 0 Then, .. $\gam a$z=\displaystyle\frac{a}{c}-\frac{\det$\gam a$}{c(\mathrm{c}z+d)}.. $\gam a$=\left(\begin{ar ay}{l} 0&b\ \mathrm{c}&d \end{ar ay}\right)\inGL_{2}(A)_{f} $\xi$( $\gamma$ z)=\displaystyle \det $\gamma$[ $\xi$(z)-\frac{ $\alpha$(2)}{\overline{ $\pi$}c}(cz+d+\frac{1}{cz+d})]+\frac{ $\alpha$(1)^{2} {\overline{ $\pi$} .. Theorem 4. For. (4.1) The. following. is the main result.. $\gam a$=\left(\begin{ar ay}{l} a&b\ c&d \end{ar ay}\right)\inGL_{2}(A) $\xi$( $\gamma$ z)=\displaystyle \det $\gamma$[ $\xi$(z)-\frac{ $\alpha$(2)}{\overline{ $\pi$}c}(cz+d+\frac{1}{cz+d})]+\frac{ $\alpha$(1)^{2} {\overline{ $\pi$}c}+\overline{ $\pi$}s(a, c). Theorem S. Let. (4.2). .. If a\neq 0 and c\neq 0_{f} then. 5. OUTLINE OF THE PROOF OF THEOREM 5. 5.1. Case. $\gamma$\in SL_{2}(A). .. Let. R_{1}= \displaystyle \sum_{0\neq f\in A} \frac{1}{fe(\overline{ $\pi$}f $\gamma$ z)}- \sum_{0\neq f\in A} \frac{1}{fe(\overline{ $\pi$}fz)}, R_{2}= \displaystyle \sum_{0\neq f\in A} \frac{1}{fe(\overline{ $\pi$}f $\gamma$ z)}- \sum_{0\neq f\in A} \frac{1}{fe(\overline{ $\pi$}fz)}. f\equiv 0 (mod c). f\equiv 0(\mathrm{m}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d} c). f\not\equiv 0 (mod c). f\not\equiv 0(\mathrm{m}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d} c). ..
(4) 82. Then, we have $\xi$( $\gamma$ z)- $\xi$(z)=R_{1}+R_{2} for which we compute R_{1} and R_{2}, separately. We first compute R_{1} By Lemma 3, 1/e(\overline{ $\pi$}f $\gamma$ z)=1/e(-\overline{ $\pi$}f/c(cz+d Hence, ,. .. R_{1}=\displayst le\overline{$\pi$}\underline{1}f\equiv0(\mathrm{ }\mathrm{o}\mathrm{C})0\neqf\inA\sum_{\mathrm{d}\sum_{g\inA}\frac{ (cz+d)}{f(gc z+d)-f}+\overline{$\pi$}\underline{1}f\equiv0(c)0\neqJ\inA\sum_{\mathrm{ }\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}\sum_{g\inA}\frac{1}f(g-z+h)}.. Setting f=f/c, R_{1}. We set. becomes. \displaystyle \frac{1}{\overline{ $\pi$}c \sum_{0\neq f'\in A}\sum_{g\in A}\frac{ z+d}{f(g(cz+d)-f)}+\frac{1}{\overline{ $\pi$}c \sum_{0\neq f'\in A}\sum_{g\in A}\frac{1}{f(g-fcz+h)}.. h=-fd and then divide R_{1}. into the part. g=0 and the part g\neq 0.. Then,. R_{1}=-\displaystyle \frac{ $\alpha$(2)}{\overline{ $\pi$}c}(cz+d+\frac{1}{cz+d}). +\displaystyle \frac{1}{\overline{ $\pi$}c}\sum_{0\neq f'\in A}\sum_{0\neq g\in A}\frac{cz+d}{f(g(cz+d)-f)}+\frac{1}{\overline{ $\pi$}c}\sum_{0\neq f'\in A}\sum_{0\neq g\in A}\frac{1}{f(g-f(cz+d) }.. In the last of the two double summation terms. Then,. above,. we. interchange f and. -\displaystyle \frac{ $\alpha$(2)}{\overline{ $\pi$}c (cz+d+\frac{1}{cz+d})+\frac{ $\alpha$(1)^{2} {\overline{ $\pi$}c .. We next compute the two. When. by. g.. R_{1} becomes. sums. in. R_{2} As for the first .. sum,. we. have. R_{3}:=f\displaystle\not\equiv0(\mathrm{ }\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}\sum_{f\inA}\frac{1}fe(\overline{$\pi$}f \gam a$z)}c=0\neq$\mu$\inA/f\inA\sum_{cA}\sum_{cf\equiv$\mu$(\mathrm{ }\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d})\frac{1}fe(\overline{$\pi$}f \gam a$z)}.. f\equiv $\mu$(\mathrm{m}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d} c) f ,. Lemma. can. be written. as. f= $\mu$+ch. for. a. certain h\in A. .. Hence,. 3,. \displaystyle\frac{\overline{$\pi$}{e(\overline{$\pi$}f$\gam a$z)}=c\sum_{g\inA}\frac{1}{cg+a$\mu$-\frac{f}cz+d}.. Setting r=cg+a $\mu$, \overline{ $\pi$}/e(\overline{ $\pi$}f $\gamma$ z). Thus,. we. When. have. can. be written. as. c( z+d)\displaystyle\sum_{r\inA,r\equiva$\mu$(\mathrm{m}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}c)}\frac{1}{r(cz+d)-f}.. R_{3}=\displaystle\overline{$\pi$}\underline{c}0\neqf\inA\sum_{$\mu$\inA_{f\equiv$\mu$}\sum_{\equiva}\sum_{g\inA,(\mathrm{ }\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}c)g$\mu$(\mathrm{ }\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}c)\frac{z+d}{f(gcz+d)-f}.. f\equiv $\mu$ (mod c), using k :=a $\mu$- $\mu$, f+k\equiv a $\mu$ (mod c). As for the R_{2} noting that a, c are coprime, we obtain. second summation in. ,. R_{4}:=f\displayst le\not\equiv0(\mathrm{ }\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}\sum_{f\inA}\frac{1}fe(\overline{$\pi$}fz)}c=0\neq$\mu$\inA/f\inA\sum_{cA}\sum_{cf\equiv$\mu$(\mathrm{ }\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d})\frac{1}(f+k)e(\overline{$\pi$}(f+k)z}..
(5) 83. Now,. we. compute. where h\in A is. \overline{ $\pi$}/e(\overline{ $\pi$}(f+k)z). as. follows.. \displaystyle \frac{\overline{ $\pi$} {e(\overline{ $\pi$}(f+k)z)} = -\sum_{g\in A}\frac{1}{g-(f+k)z+h},. fixed element. Because. a. f\equiv $\mu$(\mathrm{m}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d} c). ,. \displaystyle \frac{a $\mu$-k-d(f+k)}{c}=\frac{-bc $\mu$-d(f- $\mu$\}}{c}\in A.. Letting h=(a $\mu$-k-d(f+k))/c, \overline{ $\pi$}/e(\overline{ $\pi$}(f+k)z) becomes. Hence,. we. -c\displaystyle\sum_{r\inA,r\equiva$\mu$(\mathrm{m}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}c)}\frac{1}{r-k(f+k)(cz+d)}.. have. R_{4}=-\displayst le\underline{c}\sum_{cA_{f\equiv$\mu$}\sum_{A,(\mathrm{ }\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}c)g\equiva}\sum_{$\mu$(\mathrm{ }\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}c)}\frac{1}(f+k)(g-k(f+k)(cz+d)}\overline{$\pi$}0\neq$\mu$\inA/f\in9\inA^{\cdot} f\equiv $\mu$(\mathrm{m}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d} c). Notin \mathrm{g} that. and. Using R3. only if f+k\equiv a $\mu$ (mod c), R_{4}. becomes. -\displaystle\underline{c}\sum_{cA_{f\equiv$\mu$}\sum_{\equiva}\sum_{g0\neq$\mu$\inA/f\inA\inA,(\mathrm{ }\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}c)g$\mu$(\mathrm{ }\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}\mathrm{c})\frac{1}g(f- cz+d)}\overline{$\pi$}.. R_{4}. ,. we. obtain. R_{2}=R_{3}-R_{4}=_{\overline{$\pi$}^{\underline{\mathcal{C} \displaystle\sum_{cA_{f\equiv$\mu$}\sum_{(\mathrm{ }\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}c)g\equiva}\sum_{$\mu$(\mathrm{ }\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}c)\frac{1}fg0\neq$\mu$\inA/f\inAg\inA^{\cdot}. As. we see. side of. f\displaystle\ quiv$\mu$(\mathrm{ }\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}f\inA\sum_{c)}\frac{1}f=\sum_{s\inA}\frac{1} $\mu$+cs}=\frac{\overline{$\pi$}{ce(\overline{$\pi$} \mu$/c)}, g\displayst le\ quiva$\mu$(\mathrm{ }\mathrm{o}\mathrm{d}c)\sum_{g\inA}\frac{1}g=\sum_{i\nA}\frac{1}a$\mu$+ct}=\frac{\overline{$\pi$}{ce(\overline{$\pi$}a$\mu$/c)},. R_{2}=\overline{ $\pi$}s(a, c) Therefore, (4.2).. that. 5.2. Case. the. if and. case. of. using the. .. $\gamma$\in GL_{2}(A). .. The. cases. q=3 and \det $\gamma$=-1. we. q>3 and q=2 .. Noting that. result obtained in Subsection. $\xi$( $\gamma$ z). which is the. conclude that R_{1}+R_{2} is the. 5.1,. we. are. right‐hand. trivial. It suffices to show. \left(\begin{ar y}{l a&-b\ c&-d \end{ar y}\right). belongs. to. SL_{2}(A). have. = $\xi$(\left(\begin{ar ay}{l } a & -b\ c & -d \end{ar ay}\right)(-z) = $\xi$(-z)-\displaystyle \frac{ $\alpha$(2)}{\overline{ $\pi$}c}(c(-z)-d+\frac{1}{c(-z)-d})+\frac{ $\alpha$(1)^{2} {\overline{ $\pi$}c}+\overline{ $\pi$}s(a, c) right‐hand. side of. (4.2).. ,. ,.
(6) 84. 6. APPLICATION In this section,. Theorem 6. we. prove the. (Reciprocity. (1) If q=3. ,. law. then. following. [1,. theorem.. Let a,. 5. c\in A\backslash \{0\}. be coprime.. s(a, c)+s(c, a)=\displaystyle \frac{1}{T^{3}-T}(\frac{a}{c}+\frac{c}{a}+\frac{1}{ac}) (2) If q=2. ,. .. then. s(a, c)+s(c, a)=\displaystyle \frac{1}{T^{4}+\mathcal{I}^{Q} (\frac{a}{c}+\frac{c}{a}+\frac{1}{a}+\frac{1}{c}+\frac{1}{ac}+1). .. already proved this theorem ([1, 5 by computing the residues of rational function. Using Theorem 5, we now provide another proof. We have. Proof of. Theorem 6.. $\gam a$=\left(\begin{ar y}{l a&b\ c&d \end{ar y}\right). belongs. to. There exist. SL_{2}(A). .. b, d\in A such that ad—bc. It holds that. compute the values of the series $\xi$. on. =1. Then,. .. \left(\begin{ar ay}{l 0-1\ 10 \end{ar ay}\right)$\gam a$z=\left(\begin{ar ay}{l -c&-d\ a&b \end{ar ay}\right)z. .. We. both sides.. Using Theorem 2,. $\xi$(\displaystyle\left(\begin{ar ay}{l 0-1\ 01 \end{ar ay}\right)$\gam a$z)=$\xi$($\gam a$z)-\frac{$\alpha$(2)}{\overline{$\pi$}($\gam a$z+\frac{1}{$\gam a$z})-\frac{$\alpha$(1)^{2}{\overline{$\pi$}. 3 with Theorem. Combining Lemma. 5, this. Using (2.1) and Theorem 5,. (6.2). as. becomes. .. Equating (6.1). with. (6.2),. we. obtain. s(a, c)+s(c, a)=\displaystyle \frac{ $\alpha$(2)}{\overline{ $\pi$}^{2} (\frac{a}{c}+\frac{c}{a}+\frac{1}{ac})+\frac{ $\alpha$(1)^{2} {\overline{ $\pi$}^{2} (\frac{1}{a}-\frac{1}{c}+1). Combining (6.3) Lemma 7.. be written. $\xi$(z)-\displaystyle \frac{ $\alpha$(2)}{\overline{ $\pi$}c (cz+d+\frac{1}{\mathrm{c}z+d})+\frac{ $\alpha$(1)^{2} {\overline{ $\pi$}c +\overline{ $\pi$}s(a, c) -\displaystyle \frac{ $\alpha$(2)}{\overline{ $\pi$} (\frac{a}{c}-\frac{1}{c(cz+d)}+\frac{c}{a}+\frac{1}{a(az+b)} -\frac{ $\alpha$(1)^{2} {\overline{ $\pi$} . $\xi$(\left(\begin{ar ay}{l} -c&-d\ a&b \end{ar ay}\right)z $\xi$(z)-\displaystyle \frac{ $\alpha$(2)}{\overline{ $\pi$}a}(az+b+\frac{1}{az+b})+\frac{ $\alpha$(1)^{2} {\overline{ $\pi$}a}-\overline{ $\pi$}s(c, a). (6.1). (6.3). can. with the. (1) If q=3_{f}. following. lemma enables. us. then. $\alpha$(2)=\displaystyle \frac{\overline{ $\pi$}^{2} {T^{3}-T}, $\alpha$(1)=0. (2) If q=2_{f}. then. $\alpha$(2)= $\alpha$(1)^{2}=\displaystyle \frac{\overline{ $\pi$}^{2} {T^{4}+T^{2} .. to. a. .. complete the proof..
(7) 85. 7. AN. ANALOG OF THE SAWTOOTH FUNCTION. The sawtooth function. where. ((x)). is defined. by. ( x) =\left\{ begin{ar ay}{l \{x\}-1/2ifx\in\mathb {R}\backslash\mathb {Z},\ 0ifx\in\mathb {Z}, \end{ar ay}\right.. \{x\}. is the fraction part of. x. This function has the. .. following Fourier. expansion:. Inspired by the given x\in K_{\infty} ,. ( x) =-\displaystyle \frac{1}{2 $\pi$ i}\sum_{0\neq n\in \mathrm{Z} \frac{\exp(2 $\pi$ inx)}{n}. $\xi$(z). definition of. ,. we. define. an. analog. of. let S_{x} be the set of all a\in A such that. define. ((x)) as follows. For a e(\overline{ $\pi$}ax)\neq 0 Then, we .. F(x)=\left\{ begin{ar ay}{l} -1=\sum\frac{1}{ae(\overline{$\pi$}ax)}&ifS_{x}\neq$\phi$,\ 0&ifS_{x}=$\phi$. \end{ar ay}\right.. This function has the. following properties.. $\epsilon$\in \mathbb{F}_{\mathrm{q} \backslash \{0\}, F( $\epsilon$ x)=$\epsilon$^{-1}F(x) b\in A, F(b)=0. For b\in A, F(x+b)=F(x) Moreover, the value F(x) at x\in K can be For. .. For. .. sum. described in terms of the Dedekind. in function fields:. Theorem 8. For coprime a,. c\in A\backslash \{0\}, F(a/c)=s(-a, c). We note that for the function does not hold. It would be. ((x)). interesting. ,. .. corresponding to Theorem investigate F(x) in the future.. the result. to. 8. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This work. was. supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant. Number 15\mathrm{K}04801.. REFERENCES. [1]. A.. Bayad. and Y.. Arithmetica 152. [2]. R.. [4] [5]. D.. Hamahata, Higher dimensional Dedekind. (2012),. sums. in function. fields, Acta. 71‐80.. Dedekind, Erläuterungen zu den Fragmenten xxviii. In Collected Works of Bernhard Riemann, pages 46&478. Dover Publ., New York, 1953. [3] E.‐U. Gekeler, On the coefficients of Drinfeld modular forms, invent. Math. 93 (1988), 667‐700. Y. 9. [6]. Goss, Basic Structures of Function Field Arithmetic, Springer, Hamahata, Denominators of Dedekind sums in function fields,. (2013),. 1998. Int. J. Number. Theory. 142a−l430.. H. Rademacher and E. Grosswald, Dedekind Sums, The Mathematical Association of America, Washington, D.C., 1972.. Department of Applied Mathematics Okayama University of Science, Ridai‐cho Okayama, 700‐0005, Japan [email protected]. 1‐1. \ovalbox{\t \small REJECT}[1_{]}\otimes \mathrm{E}\backslash $\lambda$\not\cong\cdot\otimes g_{\mathbb{E} \mathrm{q}_{ $\iota$} \mathrm{r}) \tilde{7\mathrm{p} f l.
(8)
関連したドキュメント
Department of Orthopedic Surgery Okayama University Medical School Okayama Japan.. in
Conrey , A note on the fourth power moment of the Riemann zeta function, in Analytic Number Theory, Vol I; Progr.. Gonek , Simple zeros of the Riemann
After starting with basic definitions and first properties of towers of function fields over finite fields, we study the limit of a tower and give several examples in order
A lemma of considerable generality is proved from which one can obtain inequali- ties of Popoviciu’s type involving norms in a Banach space and Gram determinants.. Key words
We describe a generalisation of the Fontaine- Wintenberger theory of the “field of norms” functor to local fields with imperfect residue field, generalising work of Abrashkin for
de la CAL, Using stochastic processes for studying Bernstein-type operators, Proceedings of the Second International Conference in Functional Analysis and Approximation The-
[3] JI-CHANG KUANG, Applied Inequalities, 2nd edition, Hunan Education Press, Changsha, China, 1993J. FINK, Classical and New Inequalities in Analysis, Kluwer Academic
John Baez, University of California, Riverside: [email protected] Michael Barr, McGill University: [email protected] Lawrence Breen, Universit´ e de Paris