JAIST Repository
https://dspace.jaist.ac.jp/ Title 特許出願段階における出願人の自己評価結果を用いた 審査官前方引用件数の有用性の検証 Author(s) 安川, 聡; 加納, 信吾 Citation 年次学術大会講演要旨集, 28: 970-973 Issue Date 2013-11-02Type Conference Paper Text version publisher
URL http://hdl.handle.net/10119/11868
Rights
本著作物は研究・技術計画学会の許可のもとに掲載す るものです。This material is posted here with permission of the Japan Society for Science Policy and Research Management.
㸰㹆㸮㸲
≉チฟ㢪ẁ㝵࠾ࡅࡿฟ㢪ேࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯⤖ᯝࢆ⏝࠸ࡓ
ᑂᰝᐁ๓᪉ᘬ⏝௳ᩘࡢ᭷⏝ᛶࡢ᳨ド
ۑᏳᕝ ⪽ࠊຍ⣡ ಙ࿃㸦ᮾிᏛ㸧 㸯㸬⫼ᬒ ≉チࡢᘬ⏝ሗࡣᵝࠎ࡞どⅬࡽ⏝ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ≉ࠊ≉チࡢᘬ⏝ሗࢆ⏝ࡋ࡚ࠊ≉チࡢ౯್ࢆ ホ౯ࡋࡼ࠺ࡍࡿ◊✲ࡣ30 ᖺ௨ୖ๓ࡽ⾜ࢃࢀ࡚࠾ࡾ[1-3]ࠊ⌧ᅾࠊ๓᪉ᘬ⏝௳ᩘࡣࠊࠕ≉チࡢ౯್ࠖࡢ ᣦᶆࡋ࡚ᗈࡃ⏝࠸ࡽࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ[4,5]ࠋࡇࡇ࡛ࠊ๓᪉ᘬ⏝௳ᩘࡣࠊᑐ㇟ࡢ≉チฟ㢪ࡀࠊᚋࡢ≉チฟ㢪 ࡼࡗ࡚ᘬ⏝ࡉࢀࡓ௳ᩘࡢࡇࢆពࡋ࡚࠾ࡾࠊࡼࡾከࡃࡢ≉チฟ㢪ࡼࡗ࡚ᘬ⏝ࡉࢀࡓ≉チࠊ౯್ ࡢ㧗࠸≉チ࡛࠶ࡿ⪃࠼ࡽࢀ࡚࠸ࡿࠋ ࡲࡓࠊᘬ⏝ሗࡣࠊᘬ⏝⾜ືࡢయࡼࡗ࡚㸰ࡘศࡅࡿࡇࡀ࡛ࡁࡿࠋᑂᰝᐁࡀᑂᰝࡢ㐣⛬࠾࠸ ࡚ࠊ᪂つᛶࡸ㐍Ṍᛶࢆྰᐃࡍࡿ࡞ࡢࡓࡵᩥ⊩ࢆᘬ⏝ࡍࡿࡇࢆᑂᰝᐁᘬ⏝࠸࠸ࠊฟ㢪ேࡀ⮬ศ⮬ ㌟ࡢ≉チฟ㢪㛵㐃ࡍࡿᢏ⾡ࡋ࡚ࠊ᫂⣽᭩ࡸሗ㛤♧㝞㏙᭩࠾࠸࡚ᩥ⊩ࢆᘬ⏝ࡍࡿࡇࢆฟ㢪ேᘬ ⏝࠸࠺ࠋ ㏆ᖺࡣࠊ๓᪉ᘬ⏝௳ᩘࢆࠊᑂᰝᐁ๓᪉ᘬ⏝௳ᩘฟ㢪ே๓᪉ᘬ⏝௳ᩘ༊ศࡋ࡚ศᯒࡍࡿ◊✲ࡶ⾜ ࢃࢀ࡚࠾ࡾࠊ᪥⡿࠸ࡎࢀࡢ≉チไᗘୗ࠾࠸࡚ࡶࠊ౯್ࡢ㧗࠸≉チࠊᑂᰝᐁࡼࡿ๓᪉ᘬ⏝௳ᩘࡀ ᭷ពከ࠸୍᪉ࠊฟ㢪ேࡼࡿ๓᪉ᘬ⏝௳ᩘࡣࡑࡢࡼ࠺࡞᭷ពᕪࡀぢࡽࢀ࡞࠸ࡇࡀሗ࿌ࡉࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ [6,7]ࠋ ࡇࢀᑐࡋࠊᑂᰝᐁࡼࡿ๓᪉ᘬ⏝ࡢ᭷⏝ᛶၥࢆ࿊ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿሗ࿌ࡶᑡ࡞ࡽࡎ▱ࡽࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ [8-10]ࠋ࠼ࡤࠊ᪥ᮏࡢᑂᰝᐁ⤒㦂⪅࡛࠶ࡿ୕ཎࡣࠊᑂᰝᐁࡣ࿘▱ᢏ⾡ࡋ࡚ᩥ⊩ࢆᥦ♧ࡍࡿࢣ࣮ࢫࡀ ᑡ࡞ࡃ࡞࠸ࡇࢆ㏙ࠊᑂᰝᐁࡼࡿ๓᪉ᘬ⏝௳ᩘࢆ≉チࡢ౯್ࡢ௦⌮ኚᩘࡍࡿࡇࡢ༴㝤ᛶࢆᣦ ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿ[8]ࠋ ᡃࠎࡶྠᵝࡢ⌮⏤ࡽࠊᑂᰝᐁࡼࡿ๓᪉ᘬ⏝௳ᩘࡀᮏᙜ᭷⏝࡞ኚᩘ࡛࠶ࡿࡘ࠸࡚ၥࢆឤࡌ ࡓࠋࡑࡇ࡛ࠊᮏ◊✲࡛ࡣࠊࡇࢀࡲ࡛␗࡞ࡿࣉ࣮ࣟࢳࡼࡾࠊᑂᰝᐁࡼࡿ๓᪉ᘬ⏝௳ᩘࡀࠊ┿᭷ ⏝࡛࠶ࡿྰࢆ᳨ドࡍࡿࡇࡋࡓࠋ 㸰㸬ศᯒࡢࣉ࣮ࣟࢳ ᚑ᮶ࠊ๓᪉ᘬ⏝௳ᩘࡢ᭷⏝ᛶࢆ᳨ドࡋࡓሗ࿌ࡢከࡃࡣࠊ≉チࡀᡂ❧ࡋࡓฟ㢪ࡢࡳࢆᑐ㇟ࡍࡿࡶࡢ࡛ ࠶ࡗࡓࠋࡇࡢ᭱ࡢ⌮⏤ࡣࠊ᭱ࡶ┒ࢇ◊✲ࡀ⾜ࢃࢀ࡚࠸ࡓ⡿ᅜ࠾࠸࡚ࠊ2001 ᖺฟ㢪බ㛤ไᗘࡀ ᑟධࡉࢀࡿࡲ࡛ࡣ≉チࡀᡂ❧ࡋࡓฟ㢪ࡋබ㛤ࡉࢀ࡞ࡗࡓࡓࡵࠊ≉チࡀᡂ❧ࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸ฟ㢪ࢆศᯒᑐ ㇟ຍ࠼ࡿࡇࡀྍ⬟࡛࠶ࡗࡓࡇࡀᣲࡆࡽࢀࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊ๓᪉ᘬ⏝௳ᩘࡣࠊከࡃࡢሙྜࠕ≉チࡢ౯್ࠖ ࡢᣦᶆࡋ࡚ᢅࢃࢀ࡚࠸ࡓࡓࡵࠊࡑࡶࡑࡶ≉チࡀᡂ❧ࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸ฟ㢪ࢆศᯒᑐ㇟ຍ࠼ࡿᚲせᛶࡀⷧ ࡗࡓࡇࡶ㔜せ࡞⌮⏤ࡋ࡚ᣲࡆࡽࢀࡿࠋ ࡋࡋ࡞ࡀࡽࠊ≉チࡀᡂ❧ࡋࡓฟ㢪ࡢࡳࢆᑐ㇟ࡋࡓሙྜࠊศᯒࡢࣉ࣮ࣟࢳࡣไ㝈ࡉࢀ࡚ࡋࡲ࠺ࠋ ๓᪉ᘬ⏝௳ᩘࡢ᭷⏝ᛶࢆホ౯ࡍࡿࡓࡵࡣࠊࡑࢀẚ㍑ࡍࡁ౯್ᣦᶆࡀᚲせྍḞ࡛࠶ࡾࠊᚑ᮶ࡢ◊ ✲࡛ࡣࠊ࠼ࡤࠊ≉チᡂ❧ᚋࡢ᭦᪂ᩱ⣡ሗ[11,12]ࡸࠊฟ㢪ே࣭Ⓨ᫂⪅ࡢࣥࢣ࣮ࢺㄪᰝ⤖ᯝ[3,7,13] ࡞ࡀ౯್ᣦᶆࡋ࡚⏝࠸ࡽࢀ࡚࠸ࡓࠋࡇࢀᑐࡋࠊ≉チࡀᡂ❧ࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸ฟ㢪ࢆྵࡵ࡚ศᯒࡍࢀࡤࠊ ≉チᡂ❧๓ࡢሗࡶ⏝࡛ࡁࡿࡓࡵࠊࡇࢀࡲ࡛ࡼࡾࡶከᙬ࡞౯್ᣦᶆࢆ⏝ࡍࡿࡇࡀྍ⬟࡞ࡿࠋ ࡑࡇ࡛ࠊᡃࠎࡣࠊ≉チࡀᡂ❧ࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸ฟ㢪ࡶศᯒᑐ㇟ຍ࠼ࠊ౯್ᣦᶆࡋ࡚≉チฟ㢪ẁ㝵ࡢฟ㢪 ேࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯⤖ᯝ㸦ᑂᰝㄳồࢆ⾜ࡗࡓྰࠊᣄ⤯⌮⏤㏻▱ࢆཷࡅࡓሙྜᛂ⟅ࡋࡓྰࠊ➼㸧ࢆ⏝ ࠸࡚ࠊᑂᰝᐁ๓᪉ᘬ⏝௳ᩘࡢ᭷⏝ᛶࢆ᳨ドࡍࡿࡇࡋࡓࠋ 㸱㸬≉チฟ㢪ẁ㝵࠾ࡅࡿ⮬ᕫホ౯⤖ᯝ≉チฟ㢪ࡢ₯ᅾⓗ౯್≉チᡂ❧ᚋࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯⤖ᯝ࡛࠶ࡿ≉チࡢ᭦᪂ᩱ⣡ሗࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊከࡃࡢඛ⾜◊✲࠾࠸࡚ࠊࠕ≉ チࡢ౯್ࠖࡢᣦᶆࡋ࡚⏝࠸ࡽࢀ࡚࠸ࡿ[11,12]ࠋࡋࡋ࡞ࡀࡽࠊ≉チᡂ❧๓࡛࠶ࡿ≉チฟ㢪ẁ㝵࠾ࡅ ࡿ⮬ᕫホ౯⤖ᯝࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊ᭱⤊ⓗ≉チࡀᡂ❧ࡋ࡞࠸ฟ㢪ࡶᚲ↛ⓗྵࡲࢀࡿࡇࡽࠊࠕ≉チࡢ౯ ್ࠖࡢᣦᶆࡋ࡚ᤊ࠼ࡿࡇࡣ㐺ษ࡛ࡣ࡞࠸ࠋ≉チฟ㢪ẁ㝵ࡢࡼ࠺ࠊ☜ᐃ࡞ሗࡋྲྀᚓ࡛ࡁ࡞࠸ ≧ἣ࡛ࡣࠊ≉チࡀᡂ❧ࡋࡓሙྜࡶࡓࡽࡉࢀࡿ࡛࠶ࢁ࠺ࠕ≉チࡢ౯್ࠖࢆฟ㢪ேࡀ㐺᱁ホ౯ࡍࡿࡇ ࡣᅔ㞴࡛࠶ࡿࡽࠊฟ㢪ேࡣࠊࠕ≉チࡢ౯್ࠖ࠸࠺ࡼࡾࡣࡴࡋࢁࠊࠕ≉チฟ㢪ࡢ₯ᅾⓗ౯್ࠖᇶ࡙࠸ ࡚ࠊ⮬ᕫホ౯ࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠸ࡿᤊ࠼ࡿࡢࡀጇᙜ࡛࠶ࡿ⪃࠼ࡽࢀࡿ[14]ࠋࡍ࡞ࢃࡕࠊ≉チฟ㢪ẁ㝵࠾࠸ ࡚ࡣࠊฟ㢪ேࡣࠊࠕ≉チฟ㢪ࡢ₯ᅾⓗ౯್ࠖࡢ┦ᑐⓗ࡞ẚ㍑ࡼࡾ⮬ᕫホ౯ࢆ⾜ࡗ࡚࠾ࡾࠊ࠼ࡤࠊᑂ ᰝㄳồࡍࡿྰࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯࠾࠸࡚ࡣࠊ┦ᑐⓗ₯ᅾⓗ౯್ࡢ㧗࠸≉チฟ㢪ࢆᑂᰝㄳồࡋ࡚ࠊ₯ᅾⓗ ౯್ࡢప࠸≉チฟ㢪ࡣᑂᰝㄳồࡋ࡞࠸ഴྥࡀᙉ࠸⪃࠼ࡽࢀࡿ[15]ࠋ ࡋࡓࡀࡗ࡚ࠊ≉チฟ㢪ẁ㝵࠾ࡅࡿ⮬ᕫホ౯⤖ᯝࡣࠊࠕ≉チฟ㢪ࡢ₯ᅾⓗ౯್ࠖࡢᣦᶆࡋ࡚⏝࠸ࡿ ࡇࡀྍ⬟࡛࠶ࡾࠊୖࡢ࠾࠸࡚ࡣࠊᑂᰝㄳồࡉࢀࡓฟ㢪ࢢ࣮ࣝࣉࡣࠊᑂᰝㄳồࡉࢀ࡞ࡗࡓฟ㢪ࢢ ࣮ࣝࣉࡼࡾࡶࠊ┦ᑐⓗ₯ᅾⓗ౯್ࡀ㧗࠸ࡳ࡞ࡍࡇࡀ࡛ࡁࡿࠋ 㸲㸬ศᯒ᪉ἲ 㸲㸬㸯 ≉チሗ ᮏ◊✲࡛ࡣࠊ1991-2000 ᖺᗘࡢ᪥ᮏ≉チᗇࡢ≉チฟ㢪㸦⣙ 370 ௳㸧ࡢ࠺ࡕࠊ⣙ 1㸣࠶ࡓࡿ 36,776 ௳ࢆࣛࣥࢲ࣒㑅ᢥࡋࠊศᯒᑐ㇟ࡋࡓࠋ ࡇࢀࡽࡢฟ㢪ࡘ࠸࡚ࠊᇶ♏ሗ㸦Ⓨ᫂⪅ࠊฟ㢪ேࠊIPCࠊࣃࢸࣥࢺࣇ࣑࣮ࣜࠊᑂᰝ⤒㐣ሗ➼㸧 ࢆNRI ࢧࣂ࣮ࣃࢸࣥࢺࢹࢫࢡ㸰㸦https://www.nri-cyberpatent.co.jp/㸧ࡼࡾྲྀᚓࡋࡓࠋࡲࡓࠊᑂᰝᐁ ࡼࡿᘬ⏝࣭⿕ᘬ⏝ሗࢆIIP ࣃࢸࣥࢺࢹ࣮ࢱ࣮࣋ࢫࡼࡾྲྀᚓࡋࡓ1ࠋIIP ࣃࢸࣥࢺࢹ࣮ࢱ࣮࣋ࢫࡣࠊ᪥ ᮏ≉チᗇࡀᥦ౪ࡍࡿ≉チࢹ࣮ࢱࢆ࣮࣋ࢫసᡂࡉࢀࡓࠊ᪥ᮏ≉チᗇࡢฟ㢪ࢆໟᣓⓗ㘓ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࢹ ࣮ࢱ࣮࣋ࢫ࡛࠶ࡿ[16]ࠋIIP ࣃࢸࣥࢺࢹ࣮ࢱ࣮࣋ࢫࢆ⏝ࡍࡿࡇࡼࡾࠊศᯒᑐ㇟ฟ㢪ࡢᘬ⏝࣭⿕ᘬ ⏝ሗࡢࡳ࡞ࡽࡎࠊ1991-2000 ᖺᗘࡢ᪥ᮏ≉チᗇࡢฟ㢪ࡢᘬ⏝࣭⿕ᘬ⏝ሗࢆྲྀᚓࡍࡿࡇࡀྍ⬟ ࡞ࡗࡓࠋ 㸲㸬㸰 ᇶ‽ᑂᰝᐁ๓᪉ᘬ⏝ᩥ⊩ᩘ㸦1()&V 1RUPDOL]HGH[DPLQHUIRUZDUGFLWDWLRQV㸧 ๓᪉ᘬ⏝ሗࢆศᯒࡍࡿ࠶ࡓࡗ࡚ࡣࠊฟ㢪᪥ࡢᕪᇶ࡙ࡃษ᩿ࣂࢫࢆ⪃៖ࡍࡿᚲせࡀ࠶ࡿ[17]ࠋ ࡇࢀࡣࠊබሗࡀⓎ⾜ࡉࢀ࡚ࡽࡢᮇ㛫ࡀ㛗ࡅࢀࡤ㛗࠸ࠊᘬ⏝ࡉࢀࡿᶵࡣቑ࠼ࠊᘬ⏝ࡉࢀࡸࡍࡃ࡞ ࡿࡓࡵ࡛࠶ࡿࠋᮏ◊✲࠾࠸࡚ࡣࠊ௨ୗࡢ᪉ἲࡼࡗ࡚ᇶ‽ᑂᰝᐁ๓᪉ᘬ⏝ᩥ⊩㸦NEFCs㸧ࢆᑟฟࡋࠊ ࡇࢀࢆ⏝࠸࡚ศᯒࢆ⾜ࡗࡓࠋ IIP ࣃࢸࣥࢺࢹ࣮ࢱ࣮࣋ࢫࡼࡾࠊ1991-2000 ᖺᗘࡢฟ㢪㸦⣙ 370 ௳㸧ࡘ࠸࡚ᑂᰝᐁ๓᪉ᘬ⏝௳ ᩘࢆ⟬ฟࡋࠊฟ㢪ᖺᗘi ࠾ࡅࡿᢏ⾡༊ศ2j ࡢᑂᰝᐁ๓᪉ᘬ⏝ᩥ⊩ᩘࡢᖹᆒ್ μi,jཬࡧᶆ‽೫ᕪσi,jࢆᑟ ฟࡋࡓࠋࡑࡋ࡚ࠊྛ≉チฟ㢪ࡢฟ㢪ᖺᗘ iࠊᢏ⾡༊ศ jࠊ๓᪉ᘬ⏝ᩥ⊩ᩘ x ࡼࡾࠊ௨ୗࡢᘧᇶ࡙ࡁࠊ NEFCs ࢆ⟬ฟࡋࡓࠋ ࡇࢀࡼࡾࠊฟ㢪ᖺᗘࠊཬࡧࠊᢏ⾡༊ศࡢ㐪࠸ࡼࡿࣂࢫࢆ࢟ࣕࣥࢭࣝࡍࡿࡇࡀྍ⬟࡞ࡗࡓࠋ 㸳㸬⤖ᯝ⪃ᐹ ≉チฟ㢪ẁ㝵࠾ࡅࡿฟ㢪ேࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯࣏ࣥࢺA)㹼F)ࡘ࠸࡚ࠊฟ㢪ேࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯⤖ᯝࠊNEFCs ࡢ㛫┦㛵ࡀ࠶ࡿ࠺ࡘ࠸᳨࡚ドࢆ⾜ࡗࡓࠋ 1 ᮏ◊✲࡛ࡣࠊ2011 ᖺ 3 ᭶Ⅼࡢ IIP ࣃࢸࣥࢺࢹ࣮ࢱ࣮࣋ࢫࢆ⏝࠸ࡓࠋ
2 ྛฟ㢪ࡉࢀࡓ➹㢌IPCᇶ࡙ࡁࠊWIPOࡢᥦ౪ࡍࡿ”IPC - Technology Concordance Table” [18]
ࡑࡢ⤖ᯝࠊ࡚ࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯࣏ࣥࢺ࠾࠸࡚ࠊYes ࡢฟ㢪ࢢ࣮ࣝࣉࡢ᪉ࡀࠊNo ࡢฟ㢪ࢢ࣮ࣝࣉࡼࡾࡶ ᭷ពNEFCs ࡀࡁ࠸ࡇࡀ☜ㄆࡉࢀࡓ㸦⾲㸯㸧ࠋ A)㹼F)ࡢ࠸ࡎࢀࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯࣏ࣥࢺ࠾࠸࡚ࡶࠊYes ࡢฟ㢪ࢢ࣮ࣝࣉࡢ᪉ࡀ No ࡢฟ㢪ࢢ࣮ࣝࣉࡼࡾ ࡶ┦ᑐⓗ₯ᅾⓗ౯್ࡀ㧗࠸ゎࡍࡿࡇࡀ࡛ࡁࡿࡓࡵࠊࡇࡢ⤖ᯝࡼࡾࠊ࡚ࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯࣏ࣥࢺ ࠾࠸࡚ࠊ₯ᅾⓗ౯್ࡢ㧗࠸ฟ㢪ࢢ࣮ࣝࣉࡢ᪉ࡀNEFCs ࡀࡁ࠸ࡇࡀ☜ㄆࡉࢀࡓ࠸࠼ࡿࠋ ⾲㸯 NEFCs vs ≉チฟ㢪ẁ㝵࠾ࡅࡿฟ㢪ேࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯⤖ᯝ ฟ㢪ே䛾⮬ᕫホ౯ ௳ᩘ Yes No A) ᾏእ䜈䛾ฟ㢪 (Yes/No) 36,776 0.15 䠄N=7,994䠅 -0.04 䠄N=28,782䠅 ** B) ᑂᰝㄳồ (Yes/No) 36,776 0.14 䠄N=21,153䠅 -0.19 䠄N=15,623䠅 ** C) ᪩ᮇᑂᰝㄳồ䠄ᑂᰝㄳồ௳୰䠅 (Yes/No) 21,153 䠄N=138䠅1.11 䠄N=21,015䠅0.13 ** D) ᣄ⤯⌮⏤㏻▱䜈䛾ᛂ⟅䠄ᣄ⤯⌮⏤㏻▱䜢ཷ䛡䛯௳୰䠅 (Yes/No) 17,693 䠄N=12,595䠅0.23 䠄N=5,098䠅-0.02 ** E) ᑂุㄳồ䠄ᣄ⤯ᰝᐃ䜢ཷ䛡䛯௳୰䠅 (Yes/No) 9,419 䠄N=1,937䠅0.43 䠄N=7,482䠅0.02 ** F) ≉チⓏ㘓䠄≉チᰝᐃ䜢ཷ䛡䛯௳୰䠅 (Yes/No) 11,075 䠄N=10,932䠅0.18 䠄N=143䠅-0.12 ** ** P < .01 in the Mann-Whitney U test ࡉࡽ᳨ドࢆ⾜࠺ࡓࡵࠊࣃࢸࣥࢺࣇ࣑࣮ࣜࢆศᯒࡋࠊฟ㢪ᅜᩘNEFCs ࡢ㛵ಀࡘ࠸࡚ㄪᰝࡋ ࡓࠋࡇࡢ㝿ࠊእᅜࡢฟ㢪ேࢆྵࡴฟ㢪ࡘ࠸࡚ࡣࠊฟ㢪ᅜᩘࡀ㸯㸦᪥ᮏࡢࡳ㸧࡞ࡿࢣ࣮ࢫࡀᴟࡵ࡚ࡲ ࢀ࡛࠶ࡿࡇࢆ㚷ࡳ࡚ࠊฟ㢪ேࡢఫᡤࡀ᪥ᮏᅜෆ࡛࠶ࡿ≉チฟ㢪㝈ᐃࡋ࡚ศᯒࢆ⾜ࡗࡓࠋ ࡑࡢ⤖ᯝࠊฟ㢪ᅜᩘࡀࡼࡾከ࠸ฟ㢪ࢢ࣮ࣝࣉࠊNEFCs ࡁࡃ࡞ࡿഴྥࡀほᐹࡉࢀࡓ㸦ᅗ㸯㸧ࠋ㏻ ᖖࠊฟ㢪ᅜᩘࡀከࡅࢀࡤከ࠸ฟ㢪ࢥࢫࢺࡣࡁࡃ࡞ࡿࡇࡽࠊฟ㢪ᅜᩘࡢከ࠸ฟ㢪ࢢ࣮ࣝࣉࡣࠊ ࡑࢀࡔࡅ㧗࠸₯ᅾⓗ౯್ࢆ᭷ࡍࡿฟ㢪ࢢ࣮ࣝࣉ࡛࠶ࡿ࠸࠼ࡿࠋࡋࡓࡀࡗ࡚ࠊࡇࡢ⤖ᯝ࠾࠸࡚ࡶࠊ₯ ᅾⓗ౯್ࡢ㧗࠸ฟ㢪ࢢ࣮ࣝࣉࠊNEFCs ࡀࡁ࠸ࡇࡀ☜ㄆࡉࢀࡓࠋ ᅗ㸯 NEFCs vs ࣃࢸࣥࢺࣇ࣑࣮ࣜ୰ࡢฟ㢪ᅜᩘ 3እᅜࡢฟ㢪ேࢆྵࡴሙྜࠊࡇ㸯ᅜࡔࡅฟ㢪ࡍࡿࡋࡓࡽࠊࢇࡢሙྜࠊࡑࢀࡣ᪥ᮏ࡛ࡣ ࡞ࡃࠊ᪥ᮏ௨እࡢᅜ࡛࠶ࡿ⪃࠼ࡽࢀࡿࠋࡑࡢࡼ࠺࡞ฟ㢪ࡣᮏ◊✲ࡢศᯒᑐ㇟ྵࡲࢀ࡞࠸ࡓࡵࠊእᅜ ࡢฟ㢪ேࢆྵࡴฟ㢪ࢆຍ࠼࡚ฟ㢪ᅜᩘ㛵ࡍࡿ᳨ドࢆ⾜ࡗࡓሙྜࠊ㑅ᢥࣂࢫࡀⓎ⏕ࡍࡿ⪃࠼ࡽࢀ ࡿࠋ
ࡇࢀࡽࡢ⤖ᯝࡼࡾࠊฟ㢪ࢢ࣮ࣝࣉࡢ₯ᅾⓗ౯್NEFCs ࡣࠊṇࡢ┦㛵㛵ಀࢆ᭷ࡋ࡚࠸ࡿࡢ⤖ㄽ ࢆᑟࡃࡇࡀ࡛ࡁࡿࠋ 㸴㸬ࡲࡵ ᮏ◊✲࡛ࡣࠊ≉チฟ㢪ẁ㝵࠾ࡅࡿฟ㢪ேࡢ⮬ᕫホ౯⤖ᯝ≉╔┠ࡋ࡚ࠊᑂᰝᐁࡼࡿ๓᪉ᘬ⏝௳ ᩘࡢ᭷⏝ᛶࢆ᳨ドࡋࡓࠋࡑࡢ⤖ᯝࠊฟ㢪ࢢ࣮ࣝࣉࡢ₯ᅾⓗ౯್NEFCs ࡀṇࡢ┦㛵㛵ಀࢆ᭷ࡋ࡚࠸ ࡿࡇࡀ☜ㄆࡉࢀࡓࠋ ᡃࠎࡣࠊᑂᰝᐁࡼࡿ๓᪉ᘬ⏝௳ᩘࡢ᭷⏝ᛶၥࢆᣢࡗ࡚࠸ࡓࡀࠊࡑࡢၥࡣᡶࡋࡻࡃࡉࢀࡓࠋᑡ ࡞ࡃࡶ᪥ᮏࡢ≉チฟ㢪ࡢ࣐ࢡࣟศᯒ࠾࠸࡚ࡣࠊᑂᰝᐁࡼࡿ๓᪉ᘬ⏝௳ᩘࡣࠊฟ㢪ࢢ࣮ࣝࣉࡢ₯ᅾ ⓗ౯್ࡢᣦᶆࡋ࡚⏝ࡍࡿࡇࡀྍ⬟࡛࠶ࡿࠋࡲࡓࠊࡑࡢ㝿ࠊ≉チࡀᡂ❧ࡋࡓฟ㢪ࡔࡅ࡛࡞ࡃࠊ≉チ ࡀᡂ❧ࡋ࡚࠸࡞࠸≉チฟ㢪ࡶྵࡵ࡚ศᯒࡍࡿࡇࡀྍ⬟࡛࠶ࡿࡓࡵࠊ㠀ᖖ᭷⏝ᛶࡀ㧗࠸⪃࠼ࡽࢀࡿࠋ 㸺ཧ⪃ᩥ⊩㸼
[1] Carpenter, M. P., Narin, F., & Woolf, P. (1981). Citation rates to technologically important patents. World patent information, 3, 160–163.
[2] Albert, M. B., Avery, D., Narin, F., & McAllister, P. (1991). Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Research policy, 20, 251–259.
[3] Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F. M., & Vopel, K. (1999). Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81, 511–515.
[4] Lanjouw, J. O., & Schankeman, M. (2004). Patent quality and research productivity: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. Economic Journal, 114, 441–465.
[5] OECD (2009). OECD Patent Statistics Manual.
http://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/oecdpatentstatisticsmanual.htm
[6] Hegde, D., & Sampat, B. (2009). Examiner citations, applicant citations, and the private value of patents. Economics Letters, 105, 287–289.
[7] ⏣ဴኵ (2010). Ⓨ᫂⪅ࡼࡿඛ⾜≉チㄆ㆑≉チᚋ᪉ᘬ⏝. RIETI Discussion Paper Series, 10-J-001. [8] ୕ཎ(2012). ࣂ࢜ࢸࢡࣀࣟࢪ࣮ศ㔝࠾ࡅࡿ≉チศ㢮࠾ࡼࡧᘬ⏝ሗࢆᣦᶆࡋࡓ≉チࡢ౯
್ホ౯㛵ࡍࡿ୍⪃ᐹ. ሗ⟶⌮, 54, 738–749.
[9] Cockburn, I. M., Kortum, S., & Stern, S. (2002). Are All Patent Examiners Equal? The Impact of Characteristics on Patent Statistics and Litigation Outcomes. National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER Working Paper, No.8980.
[10] Meyer, M. (2000). What is special about patent citations? Differences between scientific and patent citations. Scientometrics, 49, 93–123.
[11] Griliches, Z., Pakes, A., & Hall, B. H. (1986). The Value of Patents as Indicators of Inventive Activity. NBER Working Paper, No. 2083.
[12] Lanjouw, J. O., Pakes, A., & Putnam, J. (1998). How to count patents and value intellectual property: The uses of patent renewal and application data. Journal of Industrial Economics, 46, 405–432.
[13] Nagaoka, S., & Walsh, J. (2009). The R&D Process in the U.S. and Japan: Major findings from the RIETI-Georgia Tech inventor survey. RIETI Discussion Paper Series, 09-E-010.
[14] Pitkithly, R. (1999). The Valuation of Patents: A review of patent valuation methods with consideration of option based methods and the potential for further research. OIPRC Electronic Journal of Intellectual Property Right, WP 05/99.
[15] Palangkaraya, A., Jensen, P. H., & Webster, E. (2008). Applicant behaviour in patent examination request lags. Economics Letters, 101, 243–245.
[16] Goto, A., & Motohashi, K. (2007). Construction of a Japanese patent database and a first look at Japanese patenting activities. Research Policy, 36, 1431–1442.
[17] Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper, No. 8498.
[18] WIPO (2013). IPC - Technology Concordance Table.
