厨芥を対象とした水蒸気ガス化に関する基礎的研究
10
0
0
全文
(2) A_!¼¡¢½ Vol. , No. , pp. ῍
(3) ,
(4). . 49. .
(5)
(6) * . * . **. ῐ῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎῎ῑ ῐ !"# ῑ ῐ ῑ ῐ $%&' ( )#* ῌ $%+&' ,#-. # ῑ ῐ "/ῌ) 0!1 2/34"#56$78 ῑ ῐ ῑ ῐ ' ( # % %&# 9#':(/ )* ;<56 ῑ ῐ 1=8>' 6?+, #-./20@ ABCDE +#11 F 2GH ῑ ῐ ῑ ῐ IJB# +#11 F 2G>' 6#687 !" H ῑ ῐ 2 ;K#2LM61.N2GH & OPQRCSB T3 6 ῑ ῐ ῑ ῐ 12U' ABC;N(2DE 6 H T3//45 V62U ῌ ῍7#5 ῑ ῐ %89:2UW;1XYZ?' ῑ ῐ ῑ ῐ ῑ ῐ ῒ & ῑ ῐ῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏῏ῑ. ῌ
(7) . . 61g`2G' 1> 45] IBm=1X[5x#\}~iC1hZ?. [<\]=87>?Z?/^@A_ B Z? `aC22DbZ?%#1cE2G1. 2 #a.N2GH i:/L%' ^Y V/j#klmn\a}mn87. FdG/GH#e/1H%*DbIJ#8DKK. k8op#QRCSB9:1qZ?%. LfZg hijklm+,no#p$ 5>%. ' .vR,AmT3. q' 6#* /DbCgr .N9: 6. Am+r/ sO Z?y: Z?%. 1s(< ,#MN/ #e/OP. ῍q' 8 Am+/tu87tv+Cw. t9: uQ #.vR87W8. 1g`5* ,#xyZg4"z1. +,89: QRCSB #STH. g`2GH [<\{5]=#M 7? B |} 6/~2GH U#uQ . 4U< 7?' UV/wW87X[5x %yzZ?%YZ. "#n1' 6? k%. 2GH {[|#\}~iC ]>^?9:YZ. ! r": 6 H Cw. 2G' 8517 uQ#_`/a\. l #{ 61 Z?%. >bc * #+,2d879:2d9. ' 6# ! r/ ῌ\5x#Le. #ef\ +,879:(2#- +E. .v 1L%' 7/ ¡ ,#U +, ABC;K¢ HDE +:8,R A_. n« . . n«w . . * f¬® ῌ f¯B°¦±i°m r ¢Od ** ²4!4!³´!µ ῒ¶ ῍ ·¸¹º ῍ ῍ ῍. f¬® ῌ f¯B°¦±i°m r ¢Od.
(8). E῍mail : tanaka.masaaki»national.jp. +l £%q' ( n7/ "# A_ +l ῌ¤¥¦§¨ # DE+ $%& © IDEIa=g I ;K¢DEI ¤¥ 62;N(#+1 W;2G6%q' Z7 ª7/;. ῌ ῌ.
(9) 50. x y z»{ ¼. |»} ~. ½.
(10) .
(11)
(12) . ! "#$%& '( ). * +', -./012 "# 3 4 56('& 7 8 9 : " ;'<=>?0. !"@ $A#+4B$CD 4E $F< =>?0 G%H&'῍ (I"#JK)E *L('#$%&
(13) M JK) + ,N O0P+-Q" /012 RSKT
(14) -QU 4& JKV 4 W.L /@01XYZKG[ +\ & "A# ;234] 56 78 !&
(15) M49^_( :`a b;_(/<c' -=d">?eN*f@23A(_ " '῍23 (I
(16) -RSK T gB% * 3 h$#iC D E & ;L jFk=PGO0*HI. Fig. . $# >?eNl
(17) m'῍noJp K. Schematic diagram of the thermogravimetric apparatus. O0qLM" JKqLNO"& c( JK-rsEtuA +. " gzK7+ ",N +N. O0+P* h$#iC"&.
(18) grelative mass% "#h"#$&. ῍ . . ῍. ῍.
(19) . :`a ῍. ῌ. :`a. $PGO0*HIvQ Fig. . R& O0*@ Y
(20) mm c mm .
(21) $7+MHIvQ Fig. R. SUS . V¡"#$& O0*@¢i . & w Dx+ mm y$ $#z={ST. jk"#Vlm£4c mm ¤Y~¥. "|U mg ῏+" }K~V<0. J@fQ [6& ¤Y~¥. WX& <0@YZ [6('!. JVl K ¦. 0 \ Q& 6V_( K . !&. § K n op. ]V" ;U min ^"#|. w O0*@YQZJc ¨cU. _ c& ; N[iC O0*. mm ¤Y~¥©ªKJoI" ;f ). ῎ 4 *" K . « g}K~% q¬U g rῌ& Y . K/min. min ^& |. mm c mm %¨ mm SUS V<0. `O0Jp 2O0U
(22) ῍ m /s. ]V" K. gsRw% X'j|fZJc. ab8Jp gPyrolysis% Jp U. oI& 4l <0 mm ®.
(23) ῍ kg/s _("eN. ¯ °JKo±"#V¡"G ! oIt. O0*Jp gGasification% "& O0*Jp. uPy$ <0Y j|U g. lD @YZ W.. 4
(24) M ST&. cDL U K K. o". ²³}O0 m N/s. min ^"#$ dJ=~ . WX"&. ! } K ´ U
(25) ῍. O0*@ µ¶" K. QZJ K op" ox. M `JpP*c,N]Ve l. ·& vpVl ]V }K´a+¸p". $# 0 fQL+7+P*+ P. #$wGO0°J g :©¹º¹K. ῌ ῌ.
(26) 51. ±²5 !¹ º»¼½. Fig. . Schematic diagram of the experimental apparatus. 0 &~' E¡)¢(£¤. TG῍
(27) . MS῍N min 5¥& c5. !"#. =S Y ¦j! §¨ 2 ©ª. $% $&'( )*+,+-./01. «¬ ® ¯ = !Wc ;5. 23456789:*+,+ K. "ῌ &#°±²W &³´$%. ;<- =0>"# ? @%:*+,+. &῍ῌ µ&;;¶5 XY&!I©ª. &<-
(28) AB4 CD EF
(29) G HI NP῍. Table . KX῍ JKLM N4 '(. OP Q9R( K ;RQS5 T(UOP =0>"# V:&0#WXQS5 Y89. Table . &Z[ ,+ E
(30) \-]! ;5^! _ ` 89ab_2' bacde+2f ,+&ghij klmQSW n89QS hi jkl oR5 n p(pQSW qr]qrs QS a/ =&qr] g2t2 uv89 &,+2wx. Composition of food mixture used. White rice Chicken meat Sardine Cabbage Orange Eggshell. wt· wt· wt· wt· wt· wt·. Soy sauce Sauce Dressing Sugar. wt· wt· wt· wt·. WcyzS qrs& S5 {|{| }~ + ,+ oR@ J . Table . EVARIAN CP῍ , ?! ! d&_. Chemical analysis results for samples used in this study Component. Moisture. ῎ῌ῍῏. Dry῍base. Y a 4 Table wx 5wx EV) . Wood chip. wt·. E .
(31) ῌ. wt·. .
(32). wt· wt· wt· wt· wt· wt·. . . .
(33) . ¸ ¸ . Ash. wt·. High Heating Value kJ/kg. ῌ ῌ. Food mixture. C H O N S Cl. Solid. min ῌ. ῍. Unit. Raw sample EAfter drying. . . .
(34) 52. ¶ } · ¸¹) º. ῎ . »¹¼ *. ½. =#>SE* Z[;$\]^ KL, 9Doῌ. ῎. ῌ. v8, 9]^. , ῌB_.
(35) .
(36) K . !"#$. , @AByKB * {, o J KL8, aD X9]^Z[ ;$\]^v)GB_, Z[ :. %&' Fig. ()* Fig. +, -. / K 012 345. h@ACB_LKz* ,. 678, 9 :;$<=#>5?@A. c;$\D Xxv+, ῌ L. BC)9DE, FGBHI. o8dB, ;$\<)K*. 9 JKLMNOPQRS &' LK2* T U
(37) 56BVWXD. ῎. ῍. 534567B`* a8b ῌ ()c. ῌ. Fig. 8, y K : K ,. YL, Z[;$\]^8, K +_. 9]^ x;$CYq. ;$\ded)Z[fgd :h. \(SE* 5, } 8 /aa. gBCA_c;$\DEij_*. 8 Fig. )2. CkHOlHkCO. ῌ. \SL()* +, o:ῌ¡n5;$C¢£8,. m n , oῌS Z[;$\]^8,. 1S ;$CB , m¤. Mpqr stufgB;$\_LK. ¥¦ §#¨©(, T67)* y. *. K , oῌ+;$C. _ , oῌv), 9]^8,. 8, st ¢£(, w85K* a . ῌ67Bwx, @ACByKa. L, y K ¤ ),. Bz+* {, Table ():| o} 8~. S ;$C8 )* aa+, =#>C. . By{aLS, ). -.st K y!"8, =#. 98, ῌvLoByK*. >8sª?9_a5«¬, #_B,. J{h, o8#By, ;$CA ). K 8, =#>8+WXL9_. 8, a#;$\)aBE. * {, =#>9cv), $ ῌ BFy5®LKa+, ¯+°. * {, 9D X8, ῌB . ± /ῌB%)5?2 B²&³'cS. K, oB K E* ax8ῌ. EB, %&'+Sijx:| , o. B_Ka+, 9D X678ῌ. 8ῌ:hS(9cEh, ]^:| ±. B, @Ay C_aBz+*. ´ :\8µ(E* Fig. 8, y K : K ,. aa+, ῌB@ABy,. Z[;$\]^ x;$C. Fig. . Results of thermogravimetric analysis /Dried weight base2. Fig. . ῌ
(38) ῌ. Variation of product gas flow rate with time under pyrolysis condition.
(39) 53. ¸¹Vº89:3» ¼½Q. uvpq vpq w x y1zx3{7( pq|" >3{7( pq|" }~ G( 3XG IJ'(^G. * +,^G +(3V 8qX4nv q st_ _3, 89: , 3 89:'( _ !"
(40) # , 7 $W Q" ^Gpq st3 G% ῌ Fig. . X4nῌIJJ( , 8q uvp Variation of product gas flow rate with time under gasification condition.
(41) . !" K. # $%
(42) &'( )* + . qX4nvpq . & _XY w x y1zx,ABC{7(G^G + +IJ # S^p8q o3;3{7(G ,)* 8q3'BO . S H( . , -. /012! 3. ;<= #LM K 3{'. 4
(43) 56'( 7 89:. ( pq r st, 3XG . ;<= # K > ?.
(44) 3V 89: , 7 ¡. @,ABCDEFGG +HI . u( ;<= #LM K . +(J +IJ ῌIJ !", . 3XG st, ^Y. !". K:LMNL OP QR3. u'(G )*J( 'J3 89. S #TUG 3V !. :`= 7 )*Q3¡ +HI. ",W #TUXY K:LMZ[. + S ¢£¤ ¥῍῎ A¦>o. OP \# +,]
(45) )*J( . §¨3©ªG ¥+pq,A¦«¬. + W !"IJ^ _3.
(46) )*J( + +IJ & ® ¯. , 89:34 `=a
(47) Y ῌb . °± ° ,$²pq,;<= #. ³´<-. cd S )*J( . 3¥µG 56'( ^X ῌopq . ῌ. ῌ. G. r st, G( 3XG c ῌ
(48) . Table , ef> kg
(49) Y g. ¶3 IJ . h. hi Njk . ;<= #LM K 3. IJlm X4n>opq. V89: ,
(50)
(51) .^G +(. r st
(52) ^X st,
(53). , uvpq · 8q vpq. Table . Properties of produced gas and carbon conversion ratio from sample into gas. Sample. Food mixture. Method. Pyrolysis. . Wood chip. Gasification. . . . Pyrolysis. . Gasification. . . . Porous particles Temp.. K. Volume. mN/kg῍sample. H
(54) CH. CO CO
(55) C
(56) H. mol/kg῍sample mol/kg῍sample mol/kg῍sample mol/kg῍sample mol/kg῍sample. .
(57) . Calculated heat quantity*. kJ/kg῍sample MJ/mN. . .
(58) . .
(59)
(60) . .
(61) . .
(62)
(63) . Carbon conversion ratio into gas. ῌ. . . . . . . . . .
(64) . .
(65) .
(66)
(67)
(68) .
(69)
(70)
(71) . .
(72) .
(73)
(74)
(75) . .
(76)
(77)
(78) . * Calculated with each gas amount and high heating value. ῌ ῌ.
(79) 54. ¶ q · ¸¹" º. »¹¼ #. ½.
(80) . ST1VM :tuG. ῍ . yz :; * XN q 78:234. !"#$%&'. ( ) *. 56789 *. CO+HO,H+CO. ῍. )- ./0123456789. tu1: K
(81) K X1t * F EJK/01: K
(82) 8t 9 *. K : ; *. )- Fig. 1:b: K X1F. < =>?@A. ) D qQRF) * ./0.
(83) BC.: D . $
(84) E. T QRs%:w
(85) 1V -. .F) ( ) *. EJK/01:1V
(86) * . GHIBC9EJK "FL. 23456789 K NT 7n. HM : ;'N*. 1. .
(87)
(88) q)GM EJ. OP<: QRST E. K'NVNM
(89) QRF). STU 1V * WXM ῌ ῍ 9.
(90) * ): EJK/01. TYN ῎ Z" "[& mol. ;a ./01# ) * WXM ..
(91) mol E\ ) *. 1 BC234561.XN:EJK.
(92) ; ]^_`1: STHM2a. 4F) *
(93) QR8T:. E
(94) bc"de. tu
(95) F) .8 8. EJKfg ῎ b.. ;' *. hi9j[ E9klFL m`#no1<. pF)N*. JK48¡N .1NBC. C+HO,H+CO. ῌ. ῍. ῎. ¢23451£F) ¤ ¥¦QRF ) ( ) * ): .§G K GHI K ¨©ª9v «.
(96) . Fig. , : bGHIῌ9.XN:EJK. N <D qrQRs% 9N#1V * ;G Fig. tu_` vwHx yz:
(97) QR9{| N}9* }: BCGHI~X). Fig. . ): BCY8 v.XN:E. 1V
(98) 23456GBC .V :EJK4[¬1
(99) * Fig.
(100) ῌ#b ®e$¯9
(101) * N 234569 K NT EJK ° ±§²; QR:®e$¯; *
(102) ³´1!. Variation of carbon conversion ratio into gas with time µFood¤ ῌ
(103) ῌ.
(104) ]7=>?G&T.2. Fig. . Fig. . 55. Variation of carbon conversion ratio into gas with time Wood:. Heat quantity estimated from integrated product gas amount.
(105) ῌ !"#$%&'. ; =>?G&Tq$"&r+)G&,1W. ()*+,-./%#0123!4567. st /%#=>?@A!u. v 13 . 89+):; (< =>?@AB13C. G&7jk%G&T!u v 6; wx ῌ. D0EF2G&HIJK!LM7NOP);. y ()z)u v 7u v 6;. ῌ. ῍. =>?G&T ' =] 7.. {{7*+ /%#]B|}~ῌ]S7
(106) . Fig. QRS=>?G&TUV D,-G. SG&] .q$"& =>?7. &WXYZ*+[<G&\1W]^.; _. ! P+,-W0/%#@A!. min `,-G&\1W]ab^.; . {7!^P);. G&\1W cAdefgh! K 7 i 13 G&7jk%G&Tlm K 7 K n*+[<+)Z/%#lm7op ῌ
(107)
(108) ῌ.
(109) 56. l _. ῌῌ ῍. y£ /. ῏. ½. r3s>|t#}
(110) d e5f4~&7#- MBu .
(111) ῍
(112)
(113) . 2u^_ i $ pp. ῍ i$ $ ῌ ῎w f῎IV / 5 } ia . !"# $
(114)
(115) % & #'
(116) ῍. _ pp. ῍ i$ $ } N l f ss }F῎ 'b}. (!)*"+##* . } Mde5f4Bu` a v pp.. ,-$%
(117) .# $ &/0#
(118) . ῍ i$ $ ( ¡h¢ f. 12 3456'()7#8 * 9 ". I>῎£5¤o 0 a F Bu^_ pp. ῍ i$. !
(119) #
(120) :;4 ()7 #8 * 9 "# ῍ +< =0>0. $. +< -.7#@
(121) *C"! . u2u^_ pp. ῍ i $. $ f῎© V
(122) 7# MBu^_ iB $ pp. ῍ . /DE0 F17#@
(123) *G#
(124) H34 5IC6'7#@
(125) ! F123. MV῎I¥b de5f4¦# VRC §mno ¨ a FMde5f4B. * 9
(126) * 9 "# ?, @
(127) A/
(128) B!)!7#. . $ a FM
(129) s^. i $. $ ª« ¬ f ¡῎IV5b#. J,G 45K6 7D# ῍῏8 .0. z{7#®¢ MBu 2.
(130) L9*:MN0. u^_ i $ pp. ῍ i$ $ £¯l_ V° R ¤¥῎±¦ §
(131) =. O; <P. ¨¦K6 a FBu^_ pp. ῍ i$. QR= >S?@ABCTU #VDCTE+FK6WGX-. . $ K. Ito, H. Moritomi, R. Yoshiie, S. Uemiya and M. Nishimura : Tar Capture Effect of Porous Par-. W H"# Y ;ZI7#. ticles for Biomass Fuel under Pyrolysis Conditions, Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan,. ῑ ῐ ῒ ῎. Vol. , No. , pp. ῍ i $. $ [\ ] ^_JK῎L `abc5de5f4 Mg. $. Nde5f4²XK6©<W³῎bd e5f4IC&K6W. hXNOP i$. K6. $ j Q R ST U kJ VWXY῎lLZ. 6 W °± ± ´² i$. mno[5 pq >\]r3st Bu^_` a v a w pp. ῍ . $. Nde5f4²XK6©<W³῎bd e5f4IC&K6W. i$. $ bx c dVQK eyzf ghij k{_f |}~ lmj῎ no
(132) pqCp
(133) r3st-.q rs Bu^_`. b ªV«¬. ®¯5ªVbK. K6. b ªV«¬. ®¯5ªVbK. 6 W °± ± ´² i$ $ ³µ´µ ¶ ·¶῎bA/ z{ · ¸5ds¹º`s» ¼w pp. ῍ i$. a v a w pp. ῍ i$ $ t u v w x I y῎z{. ῌ
(134) ῌ.
(135)
(136) . Basic Study on Steam Gasification of Food Wastes Masaaki Tanaka*, Hitoshi Ozaki* and Hiroshi Moritomi** * Refrigeration & Air Conditioning Research Laboratory, Corporate Engineering Division, Matsushita Home Appliances Company, Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. ** Graduate School of Engineering, Gifu University Correspondence should be addressed to Masaaki Tanaka : Refrigeration & Air Conditioning Research Laboratory, Corporate Engineering Division, Matsushita Home Appliances Company, Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. ῍ ῍ ῍ Noji῍higashi, Kusatsu City, Shiga, ῍ Japan. Abstract. This study aims to clarify basic properties of thermochemical reactions, such as pyrolysis and steam gasification conditions, of food mixtures that are discarded as food wastes kitchen garbage. We also conducted experiments on wood chips for comparison. We found that the reactivity of food mixture in pyrolysis conditions was slightly inferior to that of wood chips. However, in steam gasification conditions, the reactivity of both samples was almost equal. Moreover, for the food mixtures in steam gasification conditions, the ratio of carbon conversion into gas was . To evaluate gas heat quantities for each process, almost. was for tar reformation and almost was for pyrolysis gas and char gasification. Therefore, steam gasification was effective for the thermochemical reaction of food mixtures and this reaction could produce hydrogen rich fuel gases. In particular, by reforming tar effectively, the amount of fuel gas product increased significantly. These results suggest the possibility that food mixtures could be used as a fuel that is as valuable as wood chips. Key words : food waste, pyrolysis, gasification, hydrogen. ῌ
(137) ῌ. 57.
(138)
関連したドキュメント
Key Words : CIM(Construction Information Modeling),River Project,Model Building Method, Construction Life Cycle Management.
【名例勅乙 33】諸僧道亡失度牒。還俗。 a〔名例勅甲 58〕 【名例勅乙 34】諸稱川峽者。謂成都府。潼川府。利州夔州路。 a〔名例勅甲
〔注〕
1.はじめに
冷却後可及的速かに波長635mμで比色するド対照には
挿し木苗生産システムの開発を行った。2種のフタバガキ科樹種、S/to剛Sc伽jca
以上,本研究で対象とする比較的空気を多く 含む湿り蒸気の熱・物質移動の促進において,こ
こうした背景を元に,本論文ではモータ駆動系のパラメータ同定に関する基礎的及び応用的研究を