• 検索結果がありません。

A Littlewood-Paley type inequality

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "A Littlewood-Paley type inequality"

Copied!
7
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

A Littlewood-Paley type inequality

Stevo Stevi´c

Abstract. In this note we prove the following theorem:

Letube a harmonic function in the unit ballB Rnandpn2

n1,1

.Then there is a constantC=C(p, n)such that

sup

0r<1

S

|u(rζ )|pdσ (ζ )C

|u(0)|p+

B

|∇u(x)|p(1− |x|)p1dV (x)

.

Keywords: Harmonic functions, Littlewood-Paley inequality, Hardy space, maximal function, unit ball.

Mathematical subject classification: 31B05.

1 Introduction

Throughout this notenis an integer greater than or equal to 3, B(a, r)= {xRn| |xa|< r}denotes the open ball centered ataof radiusr,where|x|denotes the norm ofxRn andBis the open unit ball in then-dimensional Euclidean space Rn. S = ∂B = {xRn| |x| = 1} is the Euclidean boundary of B.

Further,dV (x)denotes the Lebesgue volume measure onB, dσ the normalized surface measure onS.

LetUbe the unit disc in the complex plane anddm(z)=rdrπ the normalized Lebesgue area measure onU.LetH(U )be the space of all harmonic functions onU andHp(U )the Hardy harmonic space i.e., the set of harmonic functions onU such that

||u||Hp(U )= sup

0<r<1

∂U

|u(reit)|pdt 1/p

<+∞.

Received 18 October 2001.

(2)

It is well known that whenp ≥ 1 for a givenuLp(∂U ),the harmonic extension ofuonU,denoted byu,is

u(z)= 1 2π

∂U

1− |z|2

|eitz|2u(eit)dt, for zU (1) Also it is well known that

rlim10u(reit)=u(eit), a.e. on ∂U anduHp(U ).

The following theorem has been recently proved in [7].

Theorem A. Supposep ≥ 1and0< s < 1.Then there is a constantC > 0 such that for any harmonic extensionuofuLp(∂U )the following estimate holds:

||uu(0)||pLp(∂U )C

U

|∇u|p(1− |z|)pps1dm(z).

It is interesting that the proof given there holds also in the casep(0,1], s=0.Hence, whenp=1 we have

||uu(0)||pLp(∂U )C

U

|∇u|p(1− |z|)p1dm(z), (2) for any harmonic extensionuofuL1(∂U ).The proof is based on the fact that the integral means of subharmonic functions are nondecreasing.

Inequality (2) can be viewed as a Littlewood-Paley type inequality. The in- equality of Littlewood and Paley is the one contained in the following theorem, see [4], [5] and [8].

Theorem B. Ifuis a function in Lp(∂U ) and ifuis the harmonic function defined via Poisson integral ofu,then

U

|∇u(z)|p(1− |z|2)p1dm(z)C

∂U

|u|p for p≥2

and

(3)

whereCis a constant indepedent ofuandp.

Theorem A motivated us to investigate analogous estimate whenp(0,1].

We consider similar estimate in the case of harmonic functions on the unit ball B.LetH(B)be the space of all harmonic functions onBandHp(B)the Hardy harmonic space onB.In this paper we prove the following theorem.

Theorem 1. Supposep ∈ [nn21,1]anduH(B).Then there is a constant C=C(p, n)such that

sup

0r<1

S

|u(rζ )|pdσ (ζ )C

|u(0)|p+

B

|∇u(x)|p(1− |x|)p1dV (x)

.

In particular, if

B|∇u(x)|p(1− |x|)p1dV (x) <,thenuHp(B).

2 Auxiliary results and the proof of the main result

In order to prove the main result we need three auxiliary results. Throughout the paperCdenotes a positive constant that may change from one step to the next.

The first one is well known Fefferman-Stein lemma that was proved in [1], see also [3].

Lemma 1. Let0< p <∞.Then for every multy-indexβ,

|Dβu(a)|pC rn

B(a,r)

|Dβu|pdV whenever B(a, r)B, for alluH(B)and some constantCdepending only onβ, pandn.

Lemma 2. Suppose0 < p <andαR.Then there is a constantC = C(p, α, n)such that

Mp(u,7/8)= max

xB(0,7/8)|u(x)|p

C

|u(0)|p+

B

|∇u(x)|p(1− |x|)p+αdV (x)

, for alluH(B).

(4)

Proof. Since u(x0)u(0)=1

0 u(t x0)dt =1

0u(t x0), x0dt, by elemen- tary inequalities we obtain

|u(x0)|pcp

|u(0)|p+ |x0|p max

|x|≤7/8|∇u(x)|p

, (3)

for eachx0B(0,7/8),wherecp=1 for 0< p <1 andcp=2p−1forp≥1.

On the other hand by Lemma 1 and some simple calculations we obtain

|∇u(x)|pC

B(x,1/16)

|∇u(y)|pdV (y) for eachxB(0,7/8)and consequently

|xmax|≤7/8|∇u(x)|p≤max{C16p+α, C}

B(0,15/16)

|∇u(y)|p(1− |y|)p+αdV (y). (4)

From (3) and (4) the result follows.

ForxB\B(0,5/9), x =rζ, ζS,and a continuous functionf let define the following “maximal” function:

fmax(x)=sup

|f (t ζ )| | |x| −5(1− |x|)

4 < t <|x| +3(1− |x|) 4

.

Lemma 3. LetuH(B).Then there is a constantC =C(p, n)such that 1

11/19

Mpp((∇u)max, r)(1r)p1rn1drC 1

0

Mpp(∇u, r)(1r)p1rn1dr.

Proof. Letx =B\B(0,11/19), ζ ∈S.By Lemma 1 it follows that ( (u)max(x) )pC

(1r)n

B((r14r)ζ,98(1r))|∇u|pdV . (5) Replacingx in (5) byU x,whereU is an arbitrary orthogonal transformation ofB,then using the change yUy and integrating with respect to the Haar measure on the orthogonal groupO(n)we obtain

((u)max(U x))pdUC (1r)n

|∇u(Uy)|pdV (y)dU.

(5)

By Fubini’s theorem and since

O(n)|g(U x)|pdU =

S|g(|x|ζ )|pdσ (ζ )we ob- tain

Mpp((u)max,|x|)C (1r)n

B((r14r)ζ,98(1r))

Mpp(u,|y|)dV (y). (6)

Multiplying (6) by(1r)p1,then integrating overB\B(0,11/19),using the fact that

1

8(1− |x|)≤1− |y| ≤ 19

8 (1− |x|) for yB r −1−r 4

ζ,9

8(1r)

and using Fubini’s theorem, we obtain

B\B(0,11/19)

Mpp((u)max,|x|)(1r)p1dV (x)

C

B\B(0,11/19)

B((r14r)ζ,98(1r))

(1− |y|)p1nMpp(u,|y|)dV (y)dV (x)

C

B

(1− |y|)p1nMpp(u,|y|)

D(y)

dV (x)dV (y)

(7)

where D(y)

x

|x1− |x|

4|x| xy|<9

8(1− |x|)

x

|xy|< 11

8 (1− |x|)

. From (7), sinceV (D(y))V (B)11n(1− |y|)nand using the polar coordinates the result follows.

Proof of Theorem 1. LetxB, x=rζ, ζS.Clearly u(x)u(0)=

1 0

u(t x)dt = 1

0

u(t x), xdt. (8) Denotetk =1−2k, kN∪ {0}.From (8) and using elementary inequalities we obtain

(6)

|u(x)|p ≤ |u(0)|p+ 1

0

u(t x), xdt p

≤ |u(0)|p+

k=1

tk

tk1

|∇u(t x), x|dt p

≤ |u(0)|p+

k=1

1 2pk sup

tk1<t <tk

|∇u(t x)|p.

(9)

Integrating (9) overSusing the fact that sup

tk<t <tk+1

|∇u(t rζ )|p(u)max(ρx),

forρ(tk1, tk),applying Lemma 2 and then Lemma 3 to the function f (x)=

∇u(rx) we obtain:

Mpp(u, r)≤|u(0)|p+C

k=0

1 2p(k+1)

S

sup

tk<t <tk+1

|∇u(t rζ )|pdσ (ζ )

≤|u(0)|p+C max

|x|≤7/8|u(x)|

+C

k=3

1 2p(k+1)

S

tk−1min<ρ<tk( (u)max(ρrζ ) )pdσ (ζ )

≤|u(0)|p+C max

|x|≤7/8|u(x)|

+C 1

3/4

(1ρ)p1

S

( (∇u)max(ρrζ ) )pρn1dσ (ζ )dρ

C

|u(0)|p+ 1

0

(1t )p1Mpp(u, rt )tn1dt

C

|u(0)|p+ 1

0

(1t )p1Mpp(u, t )tn1dt

,

where in the last inequality we use the fact that forpn−n21,the function|∇u|p is subharmonic [6, Chap. 7.3], and consequentlyMpp(u, s)is nondecreasing ins.From this the result follows.

(7)

References

[1] C. Fefferman and E. Stein,Hpspaces of several variables,Acta Math.129(1972), 137–193.

[2] W. Hayman and P. B. Kennedy,Subharmonic functions, Volume I,Academic Press, London, New York, San francisco, 1976.

[3] U. Kuran, Subharmonic behaviour of|h|p(p >0, hharmonic),J. London Math.

Soc.8(1974), 529–538.

[4] J. E. Littlewood and R. E. A. C. Paley, Theorems on Fourier series and power series II,Proc. London Math. Soc.42(1936), 52–89.

[5] D. Luecking, A new proof of an inequality of Littlewood and Paley,Proc. Amer.

Math. Soc.103(1988), 887–893.

[6] E. Stein,Singular integrals and differentiability properties of functions, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1970.

[7] Z. Wu, Carleson measures and multipliers for Dirichlet spaces, J. Funct. Anal.

169(1): (1999), 148–163.

[8] A. Zygmund,Trigonometric series, Volume II, University Press, Cambridge, 1959.

Stevo Stevi´c

Matematiˇcki Fakultet Studentski Trg 16, 11000 Beograd SERBIA

E-mail: [email protected]; [email protected]

参照

関連したドキュメント

Wang, A new inequality of Ostrowski’s type in L 1 norm and applications to some special means and to some numerical quadrature rules, Tamkang J. Wang, A new inequality of

YANG, A new Hardy-Hilbert type inequality and its applications (Chi- nese),

Bieberbach, Uber die koe ffi zientem derjenigen potenzreihen, welche eine schlithe abbildung des einheitskreises vermitteln, Preuss.. Szegö, Eine bemerkung über ungerade

Section 4 is dedicated to the application of these inequalities to study a class of equations, whose anisotropic elliptic condition is given in term of the density of Gauss measure2.

Knapp, Relpresentation theory of semisimple groups, Princeton Landmarks in Mathematics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2001, An overview based on examples, Reprint of

In certain cases the infimum in (3) is attained, see [2], especially section 5. Using ideas from [4] and [1] the authors there extended and used such characterizations for certain

Thus, we see that a square function inequality much like that of (2.13) holds; this completes the proof of Rubio de Francia’s Theorem in the one- dimensional case, aside from the

In this note, a weighted Ostrowski type inequality for the cumulative distribution function and expectation of a random variable is established.. Key words and phrases: Weight