• 検索結果がありません。

JJ II

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "JJ II"

Copied!
6
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

volume 6, issue 2, article 48, 2005.

Received 07 March, 2005;

accepted 19 March, 2005.

Communicated by:Th.M. Rassias

Abstract Contents

JJ II

J I

Home Page Go Back

Close Quit

Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics

A GEOMETRICAL PROOF OF A NEW INEQUALITY FOR THE GAMMA FUNCTION

C. ALSINA AND M.S. TOMÁS

Secció de Matemàtiques

ETSAB. Univ. Politècnica Catalunya Diagonal 649, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.

EMail:[email protected] EMail:[email protected]

c

2000Victoria University ISSN (electronic): 1443-5756 085-05

(2)

A Geometrical Proof of a New Inequality for the Gamma

Function C. Alsina and M.S. Tomás

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page2of6

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(2) Art. 48, 2005

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

Abstract

Using the inclusions between the unit balls for thep-norms, we obtain a new inequality for the gamma function.

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification:33B15, 33C05, 26D07.

Key words: Gamma function, Hypergeometric function, Inequalities.

The authors thank Prof. Hans Heinrich Kairies for his interesting remarks concerning this paper.

Since the gamma function Γ(x) =

Z

0

e−ttx−1dt, x >0

is one of the most important functions in Mathematics, there exists an extensive literature on its inequalities (see [1], [2]).

Our aim here is to present and prove the inequalities 1

n! ≤ Γ(1 +x)n

Γ(1 +nx) ≤1 x∈[0,1], n∈N.

As we will show the above inequalities follow immediately from a key geo- metrical argument. From now on for any r > 0,p, n ≥ 1we will consider the notation:

Dk·kn,r

p ={(x1, . . . , xn)∈Rn/k(x1, . . . , xn)kp < r}

(3)

A Geometrical Proof of a New Inequality for the Gamma

Function C. Alsina and M.S. Tomás

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page3of6

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(2) Art. 48, 2005

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

for then-ball of radiusrfor thep-normk(x1, . . . , xn)kp = (|x1|p+· · ·+|xn|p)1/p. To this end, we need to prove the following:

Lemma 1. For allninN,p≥1andr >0we have:

(1) Volume

Dk·kn,r

p

= 2n Γ

1 + 1pn

Γ

1 + np rn.

Proof. Forn = 1,D1,rk·k

p is the interval(−r, r), whose measure is2r, i.e., 2r= 2

Γ

1 + 1p Γ

1 + 1pr

and (1) holds. By induction, let us assume that (1) holds forn−1. Then we note that|x1|p+· · ·+|xn|p < rp is equivalent to|x1|p+· · ·+|xn−1|p < rp− |xn|p and by virtue of the induction hypothesis we have

Volume

Dn,rk·k

p

= Z

Dn,rk·k

p

dx1. . . dxn

= 2 Z r

0

Z

Dn−1,(rp−|xn|p)1/p k·kp

dx1. . . dxn−1

! dxn

(4)

A Geometrical Proof of a New Inequality for the Gamma

Function C. Alsina and M.S. Tomás

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page4of6

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(2) Art. 48, 2005

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

= 2 Z r

0

2n−1 Γ

1 + 1p

n−1

Γ

1 + n−1p (rp−xpn)n−1p dxn

= 2n Γ

1 + 1pn−1

Γ

1 + n−1p rn Z 1

0

(1−zp)n−1p dz,

wherez =xn/r.

If we considerF(a, b, c, z)the first hypergeometric function (see [3]), then Z

(1−zp)n−1p dz =zF 1

p,−n−1

p ,1 + 1 p, zn

and by well-known properties of the hypergeometric function we deduce:

Volume Dk·kn,r

p

= 2n Γ

1 + 1p

n−1

Γ

1 + n−1p rnF 1

p,−n−1 p ,1 + 1

p,1

= 2n Γ

1 + 1pn−1

Γ

1 + n−1p rn Γ

1 + 1p Γ

1 + n−1p Γ

1 + np

= 2n Γ

1 + 1pn

Γ

1 + nprn.

(5)

A Geometrical Proof of a New Inequality for the Gamma

Function C. Alsina and M.S. Tomás

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page5of6

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(2) Art. 48, 2005

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

Therefore we have

Theorem 2. For alln ∈Nandxin(0,1)we have

1

n! ≤ Γ(1 +x)n Γ(1 +nx) ≤1.

Proof. For allninNandp≥1, from the inclusions Dn,1k·k

1 ⊆Dk·kn,1

p ⊆Dk·kn,1

, we deduce

Volume

Dk·kn,1

1

≤Volume

Dk·kn,1

p

≤Volume

Dn,1k·k

,

so by Lemma1:

2n Γ(2)n

Γ(n+ 1) ≤2n Γ

1 + 1p

n

Γ

1 + np ≤2n

and with1/p=x, bearing in mind thatΓ(2) = 1,Γ(n+ 1) =n!, 1

n! ≤ Γ(1 +x)n Γ(1 +nx) ≤1.

From this it follows immediately that the functionΓ(1 +x)n/Γ(1 +nx)is strictly decreasing on(0,1].

(6)

A Geometrical Proof of a New Inequality for the Gamma

Function C. Alsina and M.S. Tomás

Title Page Contents

JJ II

J I

Go Back Close

Quit Page6of6

J. Ineq. Pure and Appl. Math. 6(2) Art. 48, 2005

http://jipam.vu.edu.au

References

[1] H. ALZER, On some inequalities for the gamma and psi functions, Math of Comp., 66(217) (1997), 373–389.

[2] H. ALZER, Sharp bounds for the ratio of q−Gamma functions, Math Nachr., 222 (2001), 5–14.

[3] E.W. WEISSTEIN, Hypergeometric function, [ONLINE: http://

mathworld.wolfram.com/HypergeometricFunction.html].

参照

関連したドキュメント

Two kind of Dirichlet problems are solved explicitly for the in- homogenous biharmonic equation in the unit disc of the complex plane.. 2000 Mathematics Subject

The results presented in this section aim to demonstrate the main ideas of the proof of Theorem 3.1 in a more simpler problem.. Corollaries have an

If a number field F contains the 2th roots of unity, then the wild kernel of F and its logarithmic -class group have the same -rank2. If F does not contain the 2th roots of unity,

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 30D35, 30A10 Key words: Inequality, Value distribution, Meromorphic

In this paper our aim is to show that the idea of using mathematical induction and infinite product representation is also fruitful for Bessel functions as well as for the Γ

In this paper, we discuss the case of equality of this Young’s inequality, and obtain a characterization for compact normal operators.. 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification:

Pruitt, Convergence of weighted averages of independent random variables, Z. Weiss, Introduction to Fourier Analysis on Euclidean Spaces, Princeton University Press, Princeton,

It is suggested by our method that most of the quadratic algebras for all St¨ ackel equivalence classes of 3D second order quantum superintegrable systems on conformally flat