パテントプールと競争政策 : 実態の展望と課題
38
0
0
全文
(2) patent blood thicket. (patent proliferation). patent. (patent fragmentation). 2. 1.
(3) 1995. 2007. DOJ. FTC. DOJ & FTC[1995. 2007] [2005. 2007]. 3. patent troll. 4. Shapiro[2001]. p.120 1. patent stacking 1. 2.
(4) hold-out. G. Geradin. Nagaoka & Nishimura[2006]. [2007]. 1. Cockburn & MacGarvie[2007]. Clarkson [2004. 2005]. social network analysis. Wasserman & Faust[1991] visualization node. arc. tie. 3.
(5) Clarkson [2004. (. 2005]. 5) FTC. Clarkson MPEG-2 FTC. PRK photorefractive keratectomy.. Clarkson [2007] 1. 1. 1. ARIB 6 G. R&D. 4.
(6) 1 1 1. VHS 30 400. DVD. G. RRC Raising Rivals’ Costs. 5. 1 000. 35.
(7) Clark. . [2000], p.4 [2005]. p.1 100. 6.
(8) FRAND. Lerner [2003]. 1990 Bekkers. .[2006]. 19. Lerner 1 1. 1990 1. 7. .[2003].
(9) 1985. 2004. ( Challenges between Competition and Collaboration ) FTC. 1995. 2007. 3G patent clearing house. 7 G. ASCAP ALCS van Overwalle. .[2007]. (defensive patent pool) Clarkson[2007]. 8. Simcoe[2006].
(10) Simcoe[2006 p.172]. OS OIN. Cable Labs. non-assertion covenants. DVD DVD. C. C. 100. DVD 6C Licensing Agency. Phillips MPEG. DVD. MPEG-2 MPEG-3. 9. 8.
(11) MPEG2 MPEG-LA. MPEG-4 Visual. AVC/H.264. G. IEEE1394. DVB-T. G. Schiff & Aoki [2007]. Striukova[2006]. 10.
(12) R&D R&D. 1 [2006]. [2007 2008] Geradin & Layne-Farrar[2007]. [2007] 9. 11.
(13) [2007] 2. [2006] 80. [2007] 20. Vd. Vt Vd. Vi. 12.
(14) Vt. Vd. std. Vi. Vd. std. std. Vd Vi. Vd. sdt. Vi. sdt. Vi. Vd. Vd. sdt. 2. 13.
(15) IEEE1394. DVB-T. AVC/H.264. MPEG-4. 10. MOEG2 AAC. Gaul [2006]. Clarkson[2007]. Yu[2007]. MPEG2 Video ARIB G. MPEG MPEG2. 11 MPEG2 Video RAND. 14. 1997.
(16) Clarkson[2004. 2005]. technology-based patent pools. MPEG Licensing Authority (MPEG LA). MPEG2. MPEG LA 8. [2006] p.117.. [2006] p.112 Clarkson & Dekorte[2006]. 15. p.194).
(17) MPEG LA. per-patent basis. G. 12. 10. DVD. 6C. 1995. Thomson Philips DVD(3C) 13. [2007]. DVD. G. 16. DVD.
(18) ARIB MPEG2. 2006. 7. ULDAGE. [2007]. 2006. 8 11 3. 17.
(19) ARIB. NHK. /. MPEG. 18.
(20) 1 ATSC. DVB. G W-CDMA TD-CDMA cdma-2000. EDGE. W-CDMA. DECT. Ericsson. 14 cdma-2000. Qualcomm. G 2001 IPEC. 1 G. 1. G Patent Ltd G 4. 19.
(21) 5. 4. A. B. C. D. E. G Patents. [2006] W-CDMA. W-CDMA Patent Licensing Program 73. ETRI. KPN. NEC. NTT. Qualcomm Nokia Ericsson Motorola. 20. Siemens. 7.
(22) G. W-CDMA. cdma-2000. Qualcomm. 15 Goldstein & Kearsey [2004]. Bekkers & West [2006]. 21. Bekkers. . [2006]. Schiff & Aoki [2007] G G G Berger [2005] Martikainen [2003] Nokia. Ericsson. Qualcomm. InterDegital. G. 21. G.
(23) Gaul [2006]. 16. Bekkers. [2006]. [2007]. 22.
(24) 10 MPEG. DVD. PRK. RRC. (. 23. ).
(25) 20 1990. 1990. 20 1902 1912. National Harrow Standard Sanitary Manufacturing. 1990 1 1990 1990. FTC 1995 MPEG2 review letter DVD(3C). 24. DVD(6C). 3G.
(26) 2007. FTC. DOJ & FTC[2007]. p.2. 1995. 1990. Masoudi[2007] objective, structural safe harbor, ex ante (. ) FTC. EC 2004. 25.
(27) 82 Bekkers. Bekkers. [2006], p.19). 2004. [2006], p.20). Lerner & Tirole [2007, p.8] 17. [2007]. 26.
(28) 18. FRAND FRAND G Qualcomm. Broadcom Qualcomm. 2006. Qualcomm. FRAND. 2007. 2006. Nokia. 2005 10. 1. Qualcomm Qualcomm CDMA. WCDMA Ericsson Nokia Texas Instruments Broadcom Qualcomm. FRAND. Qualcomm 2007. 9. 4. Qualcomm. Qualcomm Broadcom Qualcomm. Qualcomm actionable. FRAND FRAND patent ambush Rambus FRAND Broadcom. Qualcomm. 27.
(29) Qualcomm Broadcom FRAND FRAND. FRAND FRAND FRAND. FRAND. 1 FRAND. 19. 28.
(30) 1. 29.
(31) 20 FRAND. A R&D. 19203015. S. Berger MIT M. Waterson Warwick. J. Vickers Oxford. DIUS. G. Clarkson OFT. (DTI) 2008. 3. 9. 10. 1990. Simcoe [2005]. 30. 09. OFT. R. Gustafsson Helsinki. Michigan. 2007.
(32) VHS. Detkin [2007. p.642]. Choi. Sheremeta & Gold(2003). Iversen. .[2006]. .[2006]. Nielsen & Samardzija[2007]. [2007]. Overwalle MPEG2. MPEG LA. ARIB MPEG3. SISVEL. 10. 20 Bekkers. 100. AudioMPEG INC.. 30 [2006]. p.13. Table. [2006]. [2006]. 31. [2005]. van.
(33) Clarkson & DeKorte [2006] 11. Bekkers. [2006] Goldstein & Kearsey [2004]. [2006]. [2005], Nagaoka, Shimbo & Tsukada[2006] 12. 13. 2007. 10. 12 [2007]. 14 1. Gr tnes. [2007] [2008] Gustafsson 15 16. 17 18. OFT[2006] Goodman & Myers [2005]. G. 21 Martin & Meyer [2006]. 19. G. [2007]. 20. 32. G. G.
(34) [2007]. [2008]. NAC. Bekkers, R., E. Iversen and K. Blind (Bekkers Agreements:. Coordination. Mechanisms. .), 2006, “Patent Pools and Non-Assertion for. Multi-Party. IPR. Holders. in. , Lausanne, Aug. 23-26.. Standardization,” presented at. Bekkers, R. & J. West, 2006, “The Effect of Strategic Patenting on Cumulative Innovation in UMTS Standardization,” working paper No.9, Dynamics of Institutions and Markets in Europe. DIME. .. Berger, S., 2005, , Currency Books 2006. .. Choi, B., T.S. Raghu, & A. Vinze, 2006, “An Empirical Study of Standards Development for E-Business: A Social Network Perspective,” . Clark, J., J. Piccolo, B. Stanton, and K. Tyson, 2000, “Patent Pools: A Solution to the Problem of Access in Biotechnology Patents?,” US Patent and Trademark Office. Clarkson, G., 2004, “Objective Identification of Patent Thickets: A Network Analytic Approach,” Harvard Business School, Ph.D dissertation.. 33.
(35) , 2005, “Patent Informatics for Patent Thicket Detection: A Network Analytic Approach for Measuring the Density of Patent Space,” presented at , Honolulu. , 2007, “Cyberinfrastructure and Patent Thickets: Challenges and Responses,” ,. Vol.12,. No.6,. available. at. http://firstmonday.org/issues12_6/clarkson/index.html. Clarkson, G. and D. DeKorte, 2006, “The Problem of Patent Thickets in Convergent , Vol.1093, pp.180-200.. Technologies,”. Cockburn, I.M. and M. MacGarvie, 2007, “Patent, Thickets, and The Financing of Early-Stage Firms: Evidence from the Software Industry,” Working Paper 13644, NBER. Department of Justice DOJ & Federal Trade Commission FTC , 1995, . 2007, . Detkin, P.N., 2007, “Leveling the Patent Playing Field,” , Vol.6, pp.636-644. 2007 18. pp.48-57. 2006. pp.231-259. 2008 . Gaul , P., 2006, “Towards Patent Pools in Biotechnology,”. , Vol.2,. No.2, pp.123-134. Geradin, D., A. Layne-Farrar and A.J. Padilla, 2007, “Royalty Stacking in High Tech Industries: Separating Myth from Reality,” CEMFI Working Paper No.0701, presented at. , TILEC,. Brussels. Geradin, D., and A. Layne-Farrar, 2007, “The Logic and Limits of Ex Ante Competition in a Standard-Setting Environment,” discussion paper DP 2007-005, Tilburg University. Gilbert, R.J., 2002, “Antitrust for Patent Pools: A Century of Policy Evolution,” available at. 34.
(36) Goldstein, L.M. & B.N. Kearsey, 2004, , Aspatore. Goodman, D.J. and R.A. Myers, 2005, “3G Cellular Standards and Patents,” IEEE. Gr tnes, E., 2007, “Strategies for Standardization - The Case of the Mobile Industry,” , pp.1-16. Ivensen, E.J., R. Bekkers and K. Blind, 2006, “Emerging Coordination Mechanisms for Multi-party IPR Holders: Linking Research with Standardization,” presented at the , Sept.14-15, London. 2006 2007 Kelly, C.J., 2002, “Patent Pools and Antitrust Enforcement. 1997-2001,” FTC, available at. http://www.ftc.gov/opp/intellect/020417christopherjkelly.pdf. 2005 2007. 1999. Layne-Farrar, A., A.J. Padilla and R. Schmalensee, 2007, “Pricing Patents for Licensing in Standard Setting Organizations: Making Sense of FRAND Commitments,” working paper No.0702, CEMFI. Lerner, J. and J. Tirole, 2007, “Public Policy toward Patent Pools,” prepared for the , April 12. Lerner, J., J. Tirole and M. Strojwas, 2003, “Cooperative Marketing Agreement between Competitors: Evidence from Patent Pools,” working paper 9680, NBER. Martin, D.L. and C.D. Meyer, 2006, “Patent Counting, A Misleading Index of Patent Value: A Critique of Goodman & Myers and its Uses,” working paper, Social Science Research Network, available at Masoudi, G.F., 2007, “Objective Standards and the Antitrust Analysis of SDO and Patent Pool Conduct,” Department of Justice, Oct., available at. 35.
(37) . Nagaoka, S. and Y. Nishimura, 2006, “An Empirical Assessment of the Effects of Patent Thickets,” unpublished, Hitotsubashi University. Nagaoka, S., T. Shimbo and N. Tsukada, 2006, “The Structure and the Evolution of Essential Patents for Standards: Lessons from Three IT Standards,” IIR Working Paper WP#06-08, Hitotsubashi University. 2005 2007 Nielsen, C.M. and M.R. Samardzija, 2007, “Compulsory Patent Licensing: Is It a Viable Solution in the United States?,” , Vol.13,. No.2, pp.509-539.. Office of Fair Trading (OFT), UK, 2006, “Competition, Patents and Innovation,” submitted for the. meeting to be held at OFT’s head office on Sept. 17, 2007.. Schiff, A. & R. Aoki, 2007, “Differentiated Standards and Patent Pools,” Hitotsubashi University, available at. .. Shapiro, C., 2001, “Navigating the Patent Thicket: Cross Licenses, Patent Pools, and Standard Setting,” in Jaffe, A., J. Lerner and S. Stern (eds.), , Vol.1, MIT Press pp.119-150. Sheremeta, L. and E.R. Gold, 2003, “Creating a patent Clearinghouse in Canada: A Solution , Vol.11, No.3, pp.17-21.. to Problems of Equity and Access,”. Simcoe, T.S., 2005, “Explaining the Increase in Intellectual Disclosure,” working paper, University of Toronto. , 2006, “Open Standards and Intellectual Property Rights,” in Chesbrough, H., W. Vanhaverke, and J. West,. , Oxford. University Press, pp.161-183. Striukova, L., 2006, “Value Creation from Patents: Empirical Study,” working paper No.10, Dynamics of Institutions and Markets in Europe (DIME). van Overwalle, G., E. van Zimmeren, B. Verbeure and G. Matthijs, 2007, “Dealing with Patent Fragmentation in ICT and Genetics: Patent Pools and Clearing Houses,” , Vol.12, No.6, available at : http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issues12_6/vanoverwalle/index.html.. 36.
(38) Wasserman, S. and K. Faust, 1994,. ,. Cambridge University Press. Yu, S., 2007, “Navigating the Nanotechnology Patent Thicket,” http://www.devicelink.com/mddi/archive/07/11/008.html.. R R1. L1. R2. R3. L2. L3 L. 37. , available at.
(39)
関連したドキュメント
of IEEE 51st Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 2010), pp..
Standard domino tableaux have already been considered by many authors [33], [6], [34], [8], [1], but, to the best of our knowledge, the expression of the
この chart の surface braid の closure が 2-twist spun terfoil と呼ばれている 2-knot に ambient isotopic で ある．４個の white vertex をもつ minimal chart
With regard to an omniscient being, because he (or his omniscience) is absolutely imperceptible, though one does not perceive him, one cannot conclude his non-existence and
Amount of Remuneration, etc. The Company does not pay to Directors who concurrently serve as Executive Officer the remuneration paid to Directors. Therefore, “Number of Persons”
BT 1982) 。年ず占~は、
また︑郵政構造法連邦政府草案理由書によれば︑以上述べた独占利憫にもとづく財政調整がままならない場合には︑
能率競争の確保 競争者の競争単位としての存立の確保について︑述べる︒
