Research Article
Coupled fixed point theorems in d-complete topological spaces
K. P. R. Raoa,∗, S. Hima Bindub, Md. Mustaq Alia
aDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Acharya Nagarjuna University - Dr. M.R. Appa Row Campus, Nuzvid-521 201, Krishna Dt., A.P., India.
bDepartment of Mathematics, CH. S. D. St. Theresa’s Junior College for women, Eluru- 534 001, W. G. Dt., A. P., India.
This paper is dedicated to Professor Ljubomir ´Ciri´c Communicated by Professor V. Berinde
Abstract
In this paper, we obtain prove two common coupled fixed point theorems in Hausdorffd- complete topological spaces. c2012 NGA. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Coupled fixed points, d-complete space ,weakly compatible maps.
2010 MSC: Primary 47H10; Secondary 54H25.
1. Introduction and Preliminaries
In 1975, Kasahara [11, 12] introduced the notion of d-complete topological spaces as a generalization of complete metric spaces.
Definition 1.1. [11, 12]. Let (X,T) be a topological space. Supposed:X×X →[0,∞) satisfies (i) d(x, y) = 0 if and only ifx=y ,
(ii) for any sequence{xn}in X,Σ∞n=1d(xn, xn+1)<∞ implies {xn}is convergent in (X,T).
Then the triplet (X,T, d) is called ad- complete topological space.
∗Corresponding author
Email addresses: [email protected](K. P. R. Rao),s.hima [email protected](S. Hima Bindu), [email protected](Md. Mustaq Ali)
Received 2011-6-13
For details on d-complete topological spaces, we refer to Iseki [10] and Kasahara [11, 12, 13]. Hicks [6]
and Hicks and Rhoades [7, 8] proved several fixed point theorems in d- complete topological spaces. Hicks and Saliga [9] and Saliga [19] obtained fixed point theorems for non - self maps ind- complete topological spaces.
In 2006, Bhaskar and Lakshmikantham [3] introduced the notion of a coupled fixed point in partially ordered metric spaces, also discussed some problems of the uniqueness of a coupled fixed point and applied their results to the problems of the existence and uniqueness of a solution for the periodic boundary value problems.
Later several authors proved coupled fixed and common coupled fixed point theorems in partial ordered metric spaces , partially ordered cone metric spaces and cone metric spaces for two maps(Refer to [1, 4, 5, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23] ).
In this paper ,we prove a common coupled fixed point theorem for four mappings in d - complete topological spaces.
Definition 1.2. ([3]).Let X be a nonempty set. An element (x, y)∈X×X is called a coupled fixed point of the mappingF :X×X →X ifx=F(x, y) and y=F(y, x).
Definition 1.3. ([1]).Let X be a nonempty set. An element (x, y)∈X×X is called
(i) a coupled coincidence point ofF :X×X →X and g:X→X ifgx=F(x, y) and gy=F(y, x).
(ii)a common coupled fixed point of F :X×X → X and g : X → X ifx =gx =F(x, y) and y = gy = F(y, x).
Definition 1.4. ([1]).Let X be a nonempty set. The mappingsF :X×X→X and g:X →X are called W-compatible ifg(F(x, y)) =F(gx, gy) andg(F(y, x)) =F(gy, gx) whenevergx=F(x, y) andgy=F(y, x) for some (x, y)∈X×X.
In this paper,we obtain two common coupled and common fixed point theorems for two and four mappings satisfying a Berinde [2] type weak contraction conditions in Hausdorff d- complete topological spaces.
2. Main Results
Theorem 2.1. Let (X, τ, d) be a Hausdorff topological space.Let F, G :X×X → X and f, g :X → X be mappings satisfying
(2.1.1) d(F(x, y), G(u, v))≤h max
d(f x, gu), d(f y, gv), d(F(x, y), f x), d(G(u, v), gu) +L min
d(f x, gu), d(f y, gv), d(F(x, y), f x), d(G(u, v), gu), d(F(x, y), gu), d(G(u, v), f x)
,
for allx, y, u, v ∈X, where 0≤h <1 and L≥0, (2.1.2)F(X×X)⊆g(X), G(X×X)⊆f(X), (2.1.3)one of f(X) and g(X) is d- complete,
(2.1.4)the pairs (F, f) and (G, g) are W-compatible, (2.1.5)d(x, y) =d(y, x) for allx, y∈X and
(2.1.6)for each y∈X, d(xn, y)→d(x, y), whenever {xn} ⊆X, x∈X such that xn→x.
ThenF, G, f andghave a unique common coupled fixed point in X×X and also they have a unique common fixed point in X.
Proof. Letx0 and y0 be inX.
Since F(X×X)⊆ g(X), we can choose x1, y1 ∈X such that gx1 =F(x0, y0) and gy1 =F(y0, x0). Since G(X×X) ⊆f(X), we can choose x2, y2 ∈X such that f x2 =G(x1, y1) andf y2 =G(y1, x1). Continuing this process, we can construct the sequences{xn},{yn} ,{zn} and {pn}in X such that
gx2n+1=F(x2n, y2n) =z2n, say ; gy2n+1 =F(y2n, x2n) =p2n, say ;
f x2n+2=G(x2n+1, y2n+1) =z2n+1, say ; and
f y2n+2=G(y2n+1, x2n+1) =p2n+1, say ; forn= 0,1,2, .... Now d(z2n, z2n+1) =d(F(x2n, y2n), G(x2n+1, y2n+1))
≤h max{d(z2n−1, z2n), d(p2n−1, p2n), d(z2n, z2n−1), d(z2n+1, z2n)}
+L min
d(z2n−1, z2n), d(p2n−1, p2n), d(z2n, z2n−1), d(z2n+1, z2n), d(z2n, z2n), d(z2n+1, z2n−1)
=h max{d(z2n−1, z2n), d(p2n−1, p2n)}. Also
d(p2n, p2n+1) =d(F(y2n, x2n), G(y2n+1, x2n+1))
≤h max{d(p2n−1, p2n), d(z2n−1, z2n), d(p2n, p2n−1), d(p2n+1, p2n)}
+L min
d(p2n−1, p2n), d(z2n−1, z2n), d(p2n, p2n−1), d(p2n+1, p2n), d(p2n, p2n), d(p2n+1, p2n−1)
=h max{d(p2n−1, p2n), d(z2n−1, z2n)}.
Thus max{d(z2n, z2n+1), d(p2n, p2n+1)} ≤h max{d(p2n−1, p2n), d(z2n−1, z2n)}.
d(z2n−1, z2n) =d(G(x2n−1, y2n−1), F(x2n, y2n))
=d(F(x2n, y2n), G(x2n−1, y2n−1))
≤h max{d(z2n−1, z2n−2), d(p2n−1, p2n−2), d(z2n, z2n−1), d(z2n−1, z2n−2)}
+L min
d(z2n−1, z2n−2), d(p2n−1, p2n−2), d(z2n, z2n−1), d(z2n−1, z2n−2), d(z2n, z2n−2), d(z2n−1, z2n−1)
=h max{d(z2n−2, z2n−1), d(p2n−2, p2n−1)}.
d(p2n−1, p2n) =d(G(y2n−1, x2n−1), F(y2n, x2n)) =d(F(y2n, x2n), G(y2n−1, x2n−1))
≤h max{d(p2n−1, p2n−2), d(z2n−1, z2n−2), d(p2n, p2n−1), d(p2n−1, p2n−2)}
+L min
d(p2n−1, p2n−2), d(z2n−1, z2n−2), d(p2n, p2n−1), d(p2n−1, p2n−2), d(p2n, p2n−2), d(p2n−1, p2n−1)
=h max{d(p2n−2, p2n−1), d(z2n−2, z2n−1)}.
Thus max{d(z2n−1, z2n), d(p2n−1, p2n)} ≤h max{d(z2n−2, z2n−1), d(p2n−2, p2n−1)}. Hence max{d(zn, zn+1), d(pn, pn+1)} ≤h max{d(zn−1, zn), d(pn−1, pn)}
≤h2 max{d(zn−2, zn−1), d(pn−2, pn−1)}
: :
≤hn max{d(z0, z1), d(p0, p1)}. Since
∞
P
n=1
hnis convergent, it follows that
∞
P
n=1
d(zn, zn+1) and
∞
P
n=1
d(pn, pn+1) are convergent. Henced(zn, zn+1)→ 0, d(pn, pn+1)→0 as n→ ∞.
Supposef(X) is d-complete.Then {z2n+1}={f x2n+2} ⊆ f(X) and{p2n+1}={f y2n+2} ⊆ f(X) converge to someα and β inf(X) respectively.
Hence there exist x and y in X such that α = f x and β = f y. Also the subsequences {z2n}and {p2n} converge to α andβ respectively.
d(F(x, y), z2n+1) =d(F(x, y), G(x2n+1, y2n+1))
≤h max{d(f x, z2n), d(f y, p2n), d(F(x, y), f x), d(z2n+1, z2n)}
+L min
d(f x, z2n), d(f y, p2n), d(F(x, y), f x), d(z2n+1, z2n), d(F(x, y), z2n), d(z2n+1, f x)
. Lettingn→ ∞and using (2.1.5) and (2.1.6), we get
d(F(x, y), f x)≤h d(F(x, y), f x) +L(0).
HenceF(x, y) =f x=α.
d(F(y, x), p2n+1) =d(F(y, x), G(y2n+1, x2n+1))
≤h max{d(f y, p2n), d(f x, z2n), d(F(y, x), f y), d(p2n+1, p2n)}
+L min
d(f y, p2n), d(f x, z2n), d(F(y, x), f y), d(p2n+1, p2n), d(F(y, x), p2n), d(p2n+1, f y)
. Lettingn→ ∞, we getd(F(y, x), f y)≤h d(F(y, x), f y) +L(0).
HenceF(y, x) =f y=β.
Since the pair (f, S) is W-compatible, we have F(α, β) = F(f x, f y) = f(F(x, y)) = f α and F(β, α) = F(f y, f x) =f(F(y, x)) =f β.
Consider
d(F(α, β), z2n+1) =d(F(α, β), G(x2n+1, y2n+1))
≤h max{d(f α, z2n), d(f β, p2n), d(F(α, β), f α), d(z2n+1, z2n)}
+L min
d(f α, z2n), d(f β, p2n), d(F(α, β), f α), d(z2n+1, z2n), d(F(α, β), z2n), d(z2n+1, f α)
. Lettingn→ ∞, we getd(f α, α)≤h max{d(f α, α), d(f β, β)}. Also consider
d(F(β, α), p2n+1) =d(F(β, α), G(y2n+1, x2n+1))
≤h max{d(f β, p2n), d(f α, z2n), d(F(β, α), f β), d(p2n+1, p2n)}
+L min
d(f β, p2n), d(f α, z2n), d(F(β, α), f β), d(p2n+1, p2n), d(F(β, α), p2n), d(p2n+1, f β)
. Lettingn→ ∞, we getd(f β, β)≤h max{d(f β, β), d(f α, α)}.
Thusmax{d(f α, α), d(f β, β)} ≤h max{d(f α, α), d(f β, β)}. Hencef α=α and f β =β.
Thusα=f α=F(α, β)...(I) and β =f β=F(β, α)...(II)
Since F(X×X)⊆gX, there existγ, δ∈X such that gγ=F(α, β) =f α=α andgδ=F(β, α) =f β=β. Now
d(gγ, G(γ, δ)) =d(F(α, β), G(γ, δ))
≤h max{0,0,0, d(G(γ, δ), gγ)}
+L min{0,0,0, d(G(γ, δ), gγ),0, d(G(γ, δ), gγ)}
=h d(G(γ, δ), gγ).
HenceG(γ, δ) =gγ. Also
d(gδ, G(δ, γ)) =d(F(β, α), G(δ, γ))
≤h max{0,0,0, d(G(δ, γ), gδ)}
+L min{0,0,0, d(G(δ, γ), gδ),0, d(G(δ, γ), gδ)}
=h d(G(δ, γ), gδ).
Hence G(δ, γ) =gδ. Since the pair (G, g) is W-compatible, we have gα=g(gγ) =g(G(γ, δ) =G(gγ, gδ) = G(α, β) and gβ=g(gδ) =g(G(δ, γ)) =G(gδ, gγ) =G(β, α). Now consider
d(z2n, G(α, β)) =d(F(x2n, y2n), G(α, β))
≤h max{d(z2n−1, gα), d(p2n−1, gβ), d(z2n, z2n−1),0}
+L min
d(z2n−1, gα), d(p2n−1, gβ), d(z2n, z2n−1), 0, d(z2n, gα), d(G(α, β), z2n−1)
.
Lettingn→ ∞, we getd(α, gα)≤h max{d(α, gα), d(β, gβ)}. Also consider d(p2n, G(β, α)) =d(F(y2n, x2n), G(β, α))
≤h max{d(p2n−1, gβ), d(z2n−1, gα), d(p2n, p2n−1),0}
+L min
d(p2n−1, gβ), d(z2n−1, gα), d(p2n, p2n−1), 0, d(p2n, gβ), d(G(β, α), p2n−1)
.
Lettingn→ ∞, we getd(β, gβ)≤h max{d(β, gβ), d(α, gα)}. Hence gα=α and gβ=β.
Thusα=gα=G(α, β)...(III) and β=gβ=G(β, α)....(IV).
From (I),(II) (III) and (IV), we have
f α=gα=α=F(α, β) =G(α, β)...(V) and f β=gβ=β =F(β, α) =G(β, α)...(VI) Thus (α, β) is a common coupled fixed point ofF, G, f and g.
Suppose (α1, β1)∈X×X is another common coupled fixed point of F, G, f and g.
d(α1, α) =d(F(α1, β1), G(α, β))≤h max{d(α1, α), d(β1, β),0,0}
+L min{d(α1, α), d(β1, β),0,0, d(α1, α), d(α, α1)}
=h max{d(α1, α),d(β1, β)}. Also
d(β1, β) =d(F(β1, α1), G(β, α))≤h max{d(β1, β), d(α1, α),0,0}
+L min{d(β1, β), d(α1, α),0,0, d(β1, β), d(β, β1)}
=h max{d(α1, α), d(β1, β)}. Thus max{d(α1, α), d(β1, β)} ≤hmax{d(α1, α), d(β1, β)}.
Henceα1 =α and β1 =β.
Thus (α, β) is the unique common coupled fixed point ofF, G, f and g.
Now, we will show that α=β.
d(α, β) =d(F(α, β), G(β, α))
≤h max{d(α, β), d(α, β),0,0}+L min{d(α, β), d(α, β),0,0, d(α, β), d(β, α)}
=h d(α, β).
Thus α =β. Hence α is a common fixed point of F, G, f and g. Using (2.1.1), we can show that α is the unique common fixed point ofF, G, f and g.
The following example illustrates Theorem 2.1.
Example 2.2. Let X= [0,1] andd(x, y) =|x2−y2|,∀x, y∈X.
DefineF(x, y) =Sin(x2+y4 2) =G(x, y) and f x=x=gx,∀x∈X . Then d(F(x, y), G(u, v)) =d(Sin(x2+y2
4 ), Sin(u2+v2 4 ))
=
Sin2(x2+y2
4 )−Sin2(u2+v2
4 )
=
Sin(x2+y2
4 +u2+v2
4 )Sin(x2+y2
4 −u2+v2
4 )
≤ 1 4(
x2−u2 +
y2−v2 )
≤ 1
2max{d(f x, gu), d(f y, gv)}
≤ 1
2 max
d(f x, gu), d(f y, gv), d(F(x, y), f x), d(G(u, v), gu) +L min
d(f x, gu), d(f y, gv), d(F(x, y), f x), d(G(u, v), gu), d(F(x, y), gu), d(G(u, v), f x)
,
where L= 0.
One can verify all the other conditions easily. (0,0) is the unique common fixed point ofF, G, f and g.
Note: In Example 2.2, it is clear that (X, d) is a d-complete topological space and (X, d) is not a complete metric space .
Now we give another theorem for a pair of Jungck type maps without using symmetry of d.
Theorem 2.3. Let (X, τ, d) be a Hausdorff topological space.Let F : X ×X → X and f : X → X be mappings satisfying
(2.3.1) d(F(x, y), F(u, v))≤h max
d(f x, f u), d(f y, f v), d(f x, F(x, y), d(f u, , F(u, v) +L min
d(f x, f u), d(f y, f v), d(f x, F(x, y)), d(f u, F(u, v)), d(f x, F(u, v)), d(F(x, y), f u)
,
for allx, y, u, v ∈X, where 0≤h <1 and L≥0, (2.3.2)F(X×X)⊆f(X),
(2.3.3)f(X) is d- complete,
(2.3.4)the pair (F, f) is W-compatible,
(2.3.5)for each y∈X, d(xn, y)→d(x, y),whenever {xn} ⊆X, x∈X such that xn→x.
Then the mappings F and f have a unique common coupled fixed point in X ×X and also they have a unique common fixed point in X.
Proof. Letx0 andy0be inX. SinceF(X×X)⊆f(X), we can choosex1, y1 ∈X such thatf x1=F(x0, y0) and f y1 =F(y0, x0).
Continuing this process, we can construct the sequences{xn},{yn},{zn} and{pn}inX such thatf xn+1= F(xn, yn) =zn, say andf yn+1 =F(yn, xn) =pn, say forn= 0,1,2, ...
Consider
d(zn, zn+1) =d(F(xn, yn), F(xn+1, yn+1))
≤h max{d(zn−1, zn), d(pn−1, pn), d(zn−1, zn), d(zn, zn+1)}
+L min
d(zn−1, zn), d(pn−1, pn), d(zn−1, zn), d(zn, zn+1), d(zn−1, zn+1), d(zn, zn)
=h max{d(zn−1, zn), d(pn−1, pn)}. d(pn, pn+1) =d(F(yn, xn), F(yn+1, xn+1))
≤h max{d(pn−1, pn), d(zn−1, zn), d(pn−1, pn), d(pn, pn+1)}
+L min
d(pn−1, pn), d(zn−1, zn), d(pn−1, pn), d(pn, pn+1), d(pn−1, pn+1), d(pn, pn)
=h max{d(pn−1, pn), d(zn−1, zn)}. Thus
max{d(zn, zn+1), d(pn, pn+1)} ≤h max{d(pn−1, pn), d(zn−1, zn)}
≤h2 max{d(pn−2, pn−1), d(zn−2, zn−1)}
: :
≤hn max{d(p0, p1), d(z0, z1)}. Since
∞
P
n=1
hnis convergent, it follows that
∞
P
n=1
d(zn, zn+1) and
∞
P
n=1
d(pn, pn+1) are convergent. Henced(zn, zn+1)→ 0, andd(pn, pn+1)→0 asn→ ∞. Supposef(X) isd-complete. Then there existαandβ inf(X) such that {zn} and{pn} coverge to α and β respectively. Hence there exist x, y∈X such thatα =f xand β =f y.
d(zn, F(x, y)) =d(F(xn, yn), F(x, y))
≤h max
d(zn−1, f x), d(pn−1, f y), d(zn−1, zn), d(f x, F(x, y))
+L min
d(zn−1, f x), d(pn−1, f y), d(zn−1, zn), d(f x, F(x, y)), d(zn−1, F(x, y)), d(zn, f x)
. Lettingn→ ∞, we get
d(f x, F(x, y))≤h max{0,0,0, d(f x, F(x, y))}
+L min{0,0,0, d(f x, F(x, y)), d(f x, F(x, y)),0}
=hd(f x, F(x, y)).
HenceF(x, y) =f x=α.
d(pn, F(y, x)) =d(F(yn, xn), F(y, x)))
≤h max
d(pn−1, f y), d(zn−1, f x), d(pn−1, pn), d(f y, F(y, x))
+L min
d(pn−1, f y), d(zn−1, f x), d(pn−1, pn), d(f y, F(y, x)), d(pn−1, F(y, x)), d(pn, f y)
. Lettingn→ ∞, we getd(f y, F(y, x))≤h d(f y, F(y, x)),
so thatF(y, x) =f y=β.
Since (F, f) is W-compatible pair, we have
f α=f f x=f(F(x, y)) =F(f x, f y) =F(α, β) and f β=f f y=f(F(y, x)) =F(f y, f x) =F(β, α).
d(zn, f α) =d(F(xn, yn), F(α, β))
≤h max{d(zn−1, f α), d(pn−1, f β), d(zn−1, zn),0}
+L min
d(zn−1, f α), d(pn−1, f β), d(zn−1, zn) 0, d(zn−1, f α), d(zn, f α)
.
Lettingn→ ∞, we getd(α, f α)≤h max{d(α, f α), d(β, f β)}.
d(pn, f β) =d(F(yn, xn), F(β, α))
≤h max{d(pn−1, f β), d(zn−1, f α), d(pn−1, pn),0}
+L min
d(pn−1, f β), d(zn−1, f α), d(pn−1, pn) 0, d(pn−1, f β), d(pn, f β)
.
Lettingn→ ∞, we getd(β, f β)≤h max{d(β, f β), d(α, f α)}.
Thusmax{d(α, f α), d(β, f β} ≤h max{d(α, f α), d(β, f β)}
so thatf α=α and f β =β.
Thusα=f α=F(α, β)——(I) andβ=f β=F(β, α)—–(II).
Using (2.3.1) we can show that (α, β) is the unique pair inX×X satisfying (I) and (II) . Now we will show thatα=β.
d(α, β) =d(F(α, β), F(β, α))
≤h max{d(α, β), d(β, α),0,0}+L(0)
=h max{d(α, β), d(β, α)}. d(β, α) =d(F(β, α), F(α, β))
≤h max{d(β, α), d(α, β)}.
Hence, max{d(α, β), d(β, α)} ≤h max{d(α, β), d(β, α)}. Thusα=β. Henceα is a common fixed point of F and f. Using (2.3.1), we can show thatα is the unique common fixed point ofF and f.
The following example illustrates Therorem 2.3.
Example 2.4. Let X = {0,1} and d(x, y) = |x2 −y|,∀x, y ∈ X. Define F(x, y) = 1,∀x, y ∈ X and f1 = 1, f0 = 0.
Acknowledgements:
The authors are thankful to the referee for his valuable suggestions.
References
[1] M. Abbas, M. Alikhan and S. Radenovic, Common coupled fixed point theorems in cone metric spaces for W-compatible mappings, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 217 (1) (2010), 195 - 202, doi: 10.1016/
j.amc2010.05.042. 1, 1.3, 1.4
[2] V. Berinde,Approximating fixed points of weak contractions using the Picard iteration, Nonlinear Analysis Forum, 9(1) (2004), 43 -53. 1
[3] T.G. Bhaskar and V. Lakshmikantham,Fixed point theorems in partially ordered cone metric spaces and appli- cations, Nonlinear Analysis:Theory, methods and Applications,65(7)(2006), 825 - 832. 1, 1.2
[4] B.S. Choudhury and A. Kundu,A coupled coincidence point result in partially ordered metric spaces for compatible mappings, Nonlinear Analysis,73(8) (2010), 2524-2531. doi: 10.1016/ j.na.2010.06.025. 1
[5] Hui-Sheng Ding and Lu Li, Coupled fixed point theorems in partial ordered cone metric spaces, Filomat 25 (2)(2011), 137 - 149. 1
[6] T.L. Hicks,Fixed point theorems ford-complete topological spaces-I, Internat. J. Math. and Math.Sci.,15(1992), 435 - 439. doi:10.1155/S0161171292000589. 1
[7] T.L. Hicks and B.E. Rhoades, Fixed point theorems for d-complete topological spaces-II , Math.Japonica, 37 (1992), 847 - 853. 1
[8] T.L. Hicks and B.E. Rhoades,Fixed points for pairs of mappings ind- complete topological spaces, Internat. J.
Math. and Math.Sci.,16(2) (1993), 259 - 266. doi: 10.1155/ S0161171293000304. 1
[9] T.L. Hicks and L.M. Saliga,Fixed point theorems for non-self maps-I, Internat.J.Math. and Math. Sci.,17(4) (1994), 713 - 716. doi:10.1155/S0161171294001018. 1
[10] K. Iseki,An approach to fixed point theorems, Math. Sem. Notes, Kobe Univ.,3(1975), 193 - 202. 1
[11] S. Kasahara,On some generalizations of Banach Contraction theorem, Math. Sem. Notes, Kobe Univ.,3, (1975), 161 - 169. 1, 1.1, 1
[12] S. Kasahara,Some fixed point and coincidence theorems in L - Spaces, Math. Sem. Notes, Kobe Univ.,3(1975), 181 - 187. 1, 1.1, 1
[13] S. Kasahara,Fixed point iterations in L - space, Math. Sem. Notes, Kobe Univ.,4(1976), 205 - 210. 1
[14] E. Karapinar,Couple fixed point theorems for nonlinear contractions in cone metric spaces, Comp. Math. Anal, 59(12),(2010), 3656-3668. doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2010.03.062. 1
[15] E. Karapinar, Couple fixed point on cone metric spaces, Gaji university Journal of Science,24(1) (2011), 51 - 58. 1
[16] V. Lakshmikantham and Lj.Ciric,Coupled fixed point theorems for nonlinear contractions in partial ordered metric space, Nonlinear Analysis,70(2009), 4341 - 4349. 1
[17] Nguyen Van Luong and Nguyen Xuan Thuan, Coupled fixed point theorems in partially ordered metric spaces, Bulletin of Mathematical Analysis and Applications,2(4)(2010), 16 - 24. 1
[18] Nguyen Van Luong and Nguyen Xuan Thuan,Coupled fixed points in partially ordered metric spaces and appli- cation, Nonlinear Analysis,74(2011), 983 - 992. 1
[19] L.M. Saliga,Fixed point theorems for non - self maps in d- complete topological spaces, Internat. J. Math. and Math. Sci.,19(1)(1996), 103-110. doi:10.1155/S0161171296000166. 1
[20] F. Sabetghadam , H.P.Masiha and A.H.Sanatpour, Some coupled fixed point theorems in cone metric spaces, Fixed point theory and Applications,2009(2009); Article ID 125426, 8 pages. 1
[21] B. Samet,Coupled fixed point theorems for a generalized Meir - Keeler Contraction in partially ordered metric spaces, Nonlinear Analysis,72(2010), 4508 - 4517. 1
[22] W. Shatanawi,Partially ordered cone metric spaces and coupled fixed point results, Computers and Mathematics with applications,60(2010), 2508 - 2515. doi: 10.1016/ j.camwa. 2010.08.074. 1
[23] W. Shatanawi,Some common coupled fixed point results in cone metric spaces, Int. J. Math. Anal.,4(48) (2010), 2381 - 2388. 1