Volume 2010, Article ID 293846,9pages doi:10.1155/2010/293846
Research Article
An Existence Result for Second-Order Impulsive Differential Equations with Nonlocal Conditions
Meili Li and Haiqiang Liu
Department of Applied Mathematics, Donghua University, Shanghai 201620, China
Correspondence should be addressed to Meili Li,[email protected] Received 2 May 2010; Accepted 17 June 2010
Academic Editor: Guang Y. Zhang
Copyrightq2010 M. Li and H. Liu. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The Leray-Schauder alternative is used to investigate the existence of solutions for second-order impulsive differential equations with nonlocal conditions in Banach spaces. The results improve some recent results.
1. Introduction
The theory of impulsive differential equations is emerging as an important area of investigation since it is a lot richer than the corresponding theory of nonimpulsive differential equations. Many evolutionary processes in nature are characterized by the fact that at certain moments in time an abrupt change of state is experienced. That is the reason for the rapid development of the theory of impulsive differential equations; see the monographs1,2.
This paper is concerned with the study on existence of second-order impulsive differential equations with nonlocal conditions of the form
xt f
t, xt, xt
, t∈J 0, b, t /tk, Δx|ttk Ikxtk, k1, . . . , m, Δx|ttk Ik
xtk, xtk
, k1, . . . , m, x0 gx x0, x0 η,
1.1
where the statex·takes values in Banach spaceX with the norm · , x0, η ∈X, 0 t0 <
t1 < · · ·< tm < tm 1 b, Δx|ttk xtk−xt−k,Δx|ttk xtk−xt−k. f, g, andIk, Ik k 1,2, . . . , mare given functions to be specified later.
The nonlocal condition is a generalization of the classical initial condition. The first results concerning the existence and uniqueness of mild solutions to Cauchy problems with nonlocal conditions were studied by Byszewski 3. Recently, theorems about existence, uniqueness and continuous dependence of impulsive differential abstract evolution Cauchy problems with nonlocal conditions have been studied by Fu and Cao 4, Anguraj and Karthikeyan5, Abada et al.6, Li and Han7, and in the references therein.
Up to now there have been very few papers in this direction dealing with the existence of solutions for second-order impulsive differential equations with nonlocal conditions. Our purpose here is to extend the results of first-order impulsive differential equations to second- order impulsive differential equations with nonlocal conditions.
Our main results are based on the following lemma8.
Lemma 1.1Leray-Schauder alternative. LetSbe a convex subset of a normed linear spaceEand assume that 0∈S. LetG:S → Sbe a completely continuous operator, and let
ζG {x∈S:xλGx,for some 0< λ <1}. 1.2
Then eitherζGis unbounded orGhas a fixed point.
2. Preliminaries
In this section, we introduce notations, definitions, and preliminary facts which are used throughout this paper.
DenoteJ0 0, t1, Jk tk, tk 1, JJ\ {tk}, k1,2, . . . , m.We define the following classes of functions:
PCJ, X {x:J → X :xk ∈CJk, X, k0,1, . . . , m, and there existxtk, xt−k, k 1, . . . , mwithxtk xt−k},
PC1J, X {x ∈ PCJ, X : xk ∈ CJk, X, k 0,1, . . . , m, and there exist xtk, xt−k, k 1, . . . , m with xtk xt−k},where xk and xk represent the restriction ofxandxtoJk, respectivelyk0, . . . , m,andxkJk sups∈J
kxks.
Obviously, PCJ, X is a Banach space with the norm xPC max{xkJk, k 0, . . . , m},and PC1J, Xis also a Banach space with the normxPC1 max{xPC,xPC}.
Definition 2.1. A mapf :J×X×X → Xis said to be anL1-Carath´eodory if if :·, w, v:J → Xis measurable for everyw, v∈X,
iif :t,·,·:X×X → Xis continuous for almost allt∈J,
iiifor eachi >0, there existsαi∈L1J, R such that for almost allt∈J
sup
w,v≤ift, w, v ≤αit. 2.1
Definition 2.2. A functionx∈PC1J, X∩C2J, Xis said to be a solution of1.1ifxsatisfies the equationxt ft, xt, xta.e. on J, the conditionsΔx|ttk Ikxtk, Δx|ttk Ikxtk, xtk, k1, . . . , m, andx0 gx x0, x0 η.
Lemma 2.3. Ifx∈PC1J, X∩C2J, Xsatisfies
xt f
t, xt, xt
, t /tk k1,2, . . . , m, 2.2
then
xt x0 t
0
f
s, xs, xs
ds
0<tk<t
x tk
−xtk
, ∀t∈J, 2.3
xt x0 x0t
0<tk<t
x tk
−xtk
0<tk<t
x tk
−xtk t−tk t
0
t−sf
s, xs, xs
ds, ∀t∈J.
2.4
Proof. Assume thattk< t≤tk 1heret00, tm 1b. Then
xt1−x0 t1
0
f
s, xs, xs ds,
xt2−x t1
t2
t1
f
s, xs, xs ds,
...
xtk−x tk−1
tk
tk−1
f
s, xs, xs ds,
xt−x tk
t
tk
f
s, xs, xs ds.
2.5
Adding these together, we get
xt x0 t
0
f
s, xs, xs
ds
0<tk<t
x tk
−xtk
, 2.6
that is,2.3holds.
Similarly, we have
xt x0
t
0
xsds
0<tk<t
x tk
−xtk
. 2.7
Substitution of2.3in2.7gives
xt x0 x0t
0<tk<t
x tk
−xtk
0<tk<t
x tk
−xtk t−tk t
0
t−sf
s, xs, xs
ds, ∀t∈J,
2.8
that is,2.4holds.
We assume the following hypotheses:
H1f :J×X×X → Xis anL1-Carath´eodory map;
H2Ik ∈C, X, Ik ∈CX×X, X, and there exist constantsdk, dksuch thatIkw ≤ dk, Ikw, v ≤dkk1, . . . , mfor everyw, v∈X;
H3g : PCJ, X → Xis a continuous function and there exists a constantMsuch that
gx≤M, for eachx∈PCJ, X; 2.9
H4there exists a functionp∈L1J, R such that
ft, w, v≤ptψw v, for a.e. t∈J and every w, v∈X, 2.10 whereψ:0,∞ → 0,∞is a continuous nondecreasing function with
b 1 b
0
psds <
∞
c
ds
ψs, 2.11
where
cx0 M b 1η m
k1
dk b 1−tkdk
; 2.12
H5for each boundedB⊆PC1J, Xandt∈Jthe set
x0−gx tη
0<tk<t
Ikxtk
0<tk<t
Ik
xtk, xtk t−tk
t
0
t−sf
s, xs, xs
ds:x∈B 2.13 is relatively compact inX.
3. Main Results
Theorem 3.1. If the hypothesesH1–H5are satisfied, then the second-order impulsive nonlocal initial value problem1.1has at least one solution onJ.
Proof. Consider the spaceBPC1J, Xwith norm xPC1max
xPC,x
PC
. 3.1
We will now show that the operatorGdefined by
Gxt x0−gx tη
0<tk<t
Ikxtk
0<tk<t
Ik
xtk, xtk t−tk t
0
t−sf
s, xs, xs
ds, t∈J
3.2
has a fixed point. This fixed point is then a solution of1.1.
First we obtain a priori bounds for the following equation:
xt λ
x0−gx tη
λ
0<tk<t
Ikxtk λ
0<tk<t
Ik
xtk, xtk t−tk λ
t
0
t−sf
s, xs, xs
ds, t∈J.
3.3
We have
xt ≤ x0 M bη m
k1
dk m k1
b−tkdk b t
0
psψ
xs xsds, t∈J.
3.4
Denoting byμtthe right-hand side of the above inequality, we have
μ0 x0 M bη m
k1
dk b−tkdk
, xt ≤μt, t∈J, μt bptψ
xt xt, t∈J.
3.5
But
xt λη λ t
0
f
s, xs, xs
ds λ
0<tk<t
Ik
xtk, xtk
, t∈J. 3.6
Thus we have
xt≤η t
0
psψ
xs xsds m k1
dk, t∈J. 3.7
Denoting byrtthe right-hand side of the above inequality, we have
r0 η m
k1
dk, xt≤rt, t∈J, rt ptψ
xt xt, t∈J.
3.8
Let
wt μt rt, t∈J. 3.9
Then
w0 μ0 r0 c, wt μt rt
≤bptψwt ptψwt
b 1ptψwt, t∈J.
3.10
This implies that wt
w0
ds
ψs ≤b 1
b
0
psds <
∞
c
ds
ψs, t∈J. 3.11
This inequality implies that there is a constantKsuch that
wt μt rt≤K, t∈J. 3.12
Then
xt ≤μt, t∈J,
xt≤rt, t∈J, 3.13
and hence
xPC1 max
xPC,x
PC
≤K. 3.14
Second, we must prove that the operator G : B → B is a completely continuous operator.
LetBi {x ∈ B : xPC1 ≤ i}for somei ≥ 1.We first show that GmapsBiinto an equicontinuous family. Letx∈Biandt, t∈J.Then for 0< t < t≤b,we have
Gxt−Gx
t≤tη−tη
t≤tk<t
Ikxtk
0<tk<t
t−tk− t−tk
Ik
xtk, xtk
t≤tk<t
t−tk
Ik
xtk, xtk
t
0
t−s− t−s
f
s, xs, xs ds
t
t
t−s
f
s, xs, xs ds
≤
t−tη
t≤tk<t
dk
0<tk<t
t−t
dk
t≤tk<t
t−tk
dk
t
0
t−t
αisds t
t
t−s
αisds,
3.15
and similarly
Gxt−Gx t≤
t
0
f
s, xs, xs ds−
t
0
f
s, xs, xs ds
0<tk<t
Ik
xtk, xtk
−
0<tk<t
Ik
xtk, xtk
≤ t
t
αisds
t≤tk<t
dk.
3.16
The right-hand sides are independent ofx ∈ Bi and tend to zero ast−t → 0.Thus GmapsBiinto an equicontinuous family of functions. It is easy to see that the familyGBiis uniformly bounded. And fromH5, we know thatGBi is compact. Then by Arzela-Ascoli theorem, we can conclude that the mapG:B → Bis compact.
Next, we show that G : B → Bis continuous. Let {un}∞0 Bwith un → uin B.
Then there is an integerqsuch thatunt,unt ≤ qfor allnandt ∈J, soun ∈ Bq and u∈ Bq.ByH1,ft, unt, unt → ft, ut, utn → ∞for almost allt ∈J, and since
ft, unt, unt−ft, ut, ut<2αqt, we have by the dominated convergence theorem that
Gun−GuPCsup
t∈J
gun−gu t
0
t−s f
s, uns, uns
−f
s, us, us ds
0<tk<t
Ikuntk−
0<tk<t
Ikutk
0<tk<t
t−tkIk
untk, untk
−
0<tk<t
t−tkIk
utk, utk
≤gun−gu b
0
b−sf
s, uns, uns
−f
s, us, usds m
k1
Ikuntk−Ikutk m
k1
b−tkIk
untk, untk
−Ik
utk, utk−→0,
3.17 Gun−Gu
PCsup
t∈J
t
0
f
s, uns, uns
−f
s, us, us ds
0<tk<t
Ik
untk, untk
−
0<tk<t
Ik
utk, utk
≤ b
0
f
s, uns, uns
−f
s, us, usds m
k1
Ik
untk, untk
−Ik
utk, utk−→0.
3.18
ThusGis continuous. This completes the proof thatGis completely continuous.
Finally, the setζG {x∈B:x λGx, λ∈0,1}is bounded, as we proved in the first step. As a consequence ofLemma 1.1, we deduce thatGhas a fixed pointx∈Bwhich is a solution of1.1.
Acknowledgments
This work is supported by NNSF of Chinano. 10971139and Chinese Universities Scientific Fundno. B08-1.
References
1 D. D. Ba˘ınov and P. S. Simeonov, Systems with Impulse Effect, Ellis Horwood Series: Mathematics and Its Applications, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, UK, 1989.
2 V. Lakshmikantham, D. D. Ba˘ınov, and P. S. Simeonov, Theory of Impulsive Differential Equations, vol. 6 of Series in Modern Applied Mathematics, World Scientific, Singapore, 1992.
3 L. Byszewski, “Theorems about the existence and uniqueness of solutions of a semilinear evolution nonlocal Cauchy problem,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. 162, no. 2, pp. 494–
505, 1991.
4 X. Fu and Y. Cao, “Existence for neutral impulsive differential inclusions with nonlocal conditions,”
Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 68, no. 12, pp. 3707–3718, 2008.
5 A. Anguraj and K. Karthikeyan, “Existence of solutions for impulsive neutral functional differential equations with nonlocal conditions,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications, vol. 70, no. 7, pp. 2717–2721, 2009.
6 N. Abada, M. Benchohra, and H. Hammouche, “Existence and controllability results for nondensely defined impulsive semilinear functional differential inclusions,” Journal of Differential Equations, vol.
246, no. 10, pp. 3834–3863, 2009.
7 M. Li and M. Han, “Existence for neutral impulsive functional differential equations with nonlocal conditions,” Indagationes Mathematicae, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 435–451, 2009.
8 J. Dugundji and A. Granas, Fixed Point Theory, vol. 1 of Monographie Matematyczne, PNW, Warsawa, Poland, 1982.