• 検索結果がありません。

大学生の学修意欲と農業高校生の学習意欲の研究 : A大学のK農業高等学校との高大連携プログラム「K農業高校&A大学プログラム」の事例

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2021

シェア "大学生の学修意欲と農業高校生の学習意欲の研究 : A大学のK農業高等学校との高大連携プログラム「K農業高校&A大学プログラム」の事例"

Copied!
11
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

A

K

K

A

1* 2* 3* 1* 4*

1*

2*

3*

4*

K

A

3

A Study on High School and Undergraduate Students’ Learning Motivation

A Case of Joint Management of the Educational Relationship between K Agricultural

High School and A University for the “K Agricultural High School & A University Program"

Shigenori KUSUOKU1*Natsumi FUJIWARA2*Naoki YOSHIKAWA3* Aya KAIZAKI1*Toyohiko MATSUBARA4*

1* Senior Researcher of Ritsumeikan Global Innovation Research Organization, Ritsumeikan University 2* Researcher of Ritsumeikan Global Innovation Research Organization, Ritsumeikan University 3* Assistant Professor, College of Science and Engineering, Ritsumeikan University

4* Professor, College of Economics, Ritsumeikan University

Abstract: This paper introduces the joint management of an educational relationship between K Agricultural High School and A University, and reports the program's effects to increase students' motivation for learning at both schools. In the program, first, the high school students presented the results of their project based learning, and the university students and university instructor gave comments. Next, the high school students received a lecture from the university instructor and a research report from the university student. Finally, the high school students, university students, and instructors attended a social gathering. An analysis of responses to the study

(2)

students who have high motivation originally.

(Key words: high school students’ learning motivation, undergraduates’ learning motivation, joint management of the educational relationship between high schools and universities)

2009

1

63.2%

37.7%

58.0%

%

54.1%

29.8%

52.8%

%

2015

2

2004

3

1

2

A

6

A

6

1

2

3

6

2015

7

4

A

K

K

A

K

A

K

A

2015

7

4

K

A

K

A

3

20

7

3

=4

4

=2

5

=1

3

K

A

3

4

1

1

K

A

13 30

13 50

1

2

3

14 50

15

15 40

16

16 30

(3)

2015

K

3

60

3

10

×3

Bandura 1977

4

1

40

20

1

30

K

A

5

2

3

K

A

A

K

A

2

K

A

n =18

2

2

3

Q1

K

A

n =20

8

Q1

1

0

Q2

4

K

(4)

1

0

Q1

Q2

Q2

0

4

4

= 0.48 0.80 p < 0.5 p <

0.01

5

Q3

n =20

3

4

Q3

1

0

Q4

4

1

0

Q3

Q4

Q4

0

4

6

= 0.55 p < 0.01

7

Q5

A

n =19

6

A

4

6

Q5

1

0

Q6

4

1

0

Q5

Q6

Q5

0

4

8

2

A

=

0.66 0.67 p < 0.01 p < 0.001

9

Q7

n =20

5

4

6

8

Q7

1

0

Q8

4

1

0

Q7

Q8

Q8

0

4

10

2

= 0.53

0.71 p < 0.01 p < 0.001

n = 6

4

2

11

2

K

A

n

= 18

Q9

Q10

100.0%

22.2%

0.0%

38.9%

50.0%

50.0%

2

(5)

3

n

= 20

Q1

Q2

80.0%

20.0%

20.0%

35.0%

20.0%

30.0%

4

4

n

= 20

VIF

0.80

3.47

**

1.75

0.76

3.53

**

1.56

0.48

2.54

*

1.21

0.70

3.32

**

1.47

R

2

= 0.55

0.43

t

1 **p 0.01, *p 0.5 2 R2. 3 VIF=1.21 1.75 .

5

n

= 20

Q3

Q4

25.0%

0.0%

75.0%

10.0%

10.0%

15.0%

4

6

n

= 20

VIF

0.28

1.82

1.31

0.28

1.82

1.31

0.55

3.80

**

1.17

t

R

2

= 0.72

0.66

1 **p 0.01, † p 1.0 2 R2. 3 VIF=1.17 1.31 .

7

A

n

= 19

Q5

Q6

63.2%

0.0%

36.8%

47.4%

42.1%

26.3%

4

(6)

8

A

n

= 19

VIF 0.66 5.10 *** 1.18 0.67 4.04 ** 1.97 0.27 1.55 2.17

R

2 = 0.79 0.75

t

1 ***p 0.001, **p 0.01 2 R2. 3 VIF=1.18 2.17 .

9

n

= 20

Q7

Q8

50.0%

10.0%

50.0%

10.0%

10.0%

30.0%

10

n

= 20

VIF 0.53 4.26 ** 1.06 0.20 1.46 1.26 0.20 1.46 1.26 0.71 5.65 *** 1.07 2 R2. 3 VIF=1.06 1.26 .

t

R

2 = 0.78 0.72 1***p 0.001, **p 0.01

11

A B C D

20

K

A

2

K

A

8

3

4

(7)

1

2

3

3

4

5

K

A

8

3

7

n =19

A

K

A

A

A

A

9

5

K

A

5

6

4

K

A

2

K

A

4

3

1

(8)

11

1

2

2004

K

A

2

1

5

1

3

1

1

3

K

A

4

K

A

K

A

K

A

K

A

K

A

1

K

A

)

1

1)

2

2009

.

<

http://berd.benesse.jp/shotouchutou/research/detai

l1.php?id=3333 > 2015

12

31

2)

A

12

8-20

2015

.

3)

10

67-87 2004

.

4) Bandura, A. “Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying

theory of behavioral change”, Psychological

(9)

Q1

K

A

1.

2.

Q2

Q1

1.

1. 4.

1.K

2.

3.

4.

Q3

K

A

1.

2.

Q4

Q3

1.

1. 4.

1.K

2.

3.

4.

Q5

K

A

A

1.

2.

Q6

Q5

1.

1. 4.

A

1.K

2.

3.

4.

(10)

Q7

K

A

1.

2.

Q8

Q7

1.

1. 4.

1.K

2.

3.

4.

Q9

K

A

1.

2.

Q10

Q9

1.

1. 4.

2

1.K

2.

3.

4.

.

(11)

Q1

K

A

1.

2.

Q2

Q1

1.

.

参照

関連したドキュメント

一貫教育ならではの ビッグブラ ザーシステム 。大学生が学生 コーチとして高等部や中学部の

①中学 1 年生 ②中学 2 年生 ③中学 3 年生 ④高校 1 年生 ⑤高校 2 年生 ⑥高校 3 年生

国公立大学 私立大学 短期大学 専門学校 就職