The SL(2, C ) Casson invariant and cosmetic surgeries
Kazuhiro Ichihara
Nihon University, College of Humanities and Sciences
Joint work with
Toshio Saito
(Joetsu Univ. of Education) Fundamental Groups, Representations and Geometric
Structures in 3-Manifold Topology November 22, 2016 @ Hiroshima University
1 / 16
SL(2, C ) Casson invariant
Definition. [very rough]
For a closed orientable 3-manifold Σ = W
1∪FW
2, the
SL(2,C)Casson invariant λ
SL(2,C)(Σ) is defined as an oriented intersection number of X
∗(W
1) and X
∗(W
2) in X
∗(F ) which counts only compact, zero-dimensional components of the intersection.
C. L. Curtis, An intersection theory count of the SL
2(C)- representations of the fundamental group of a 3-manifold, Topology
40(2001), no. 4, 773–787.
H. U. Boden and C. L. Curtis, The SL(2,
C) Casson invariant for Dehn surgeries on two-bridge knots, Algebr. Geom. Topol.
12
(2012), no. 4, 2095–2126.
SL(2, C ) Casson invariant
Σ: a closed, orientable 3–manifold (W
1, W
2, F ): a Heegaard splitting of Σ
Then the inclusions F ,
→W
i, W
i,
→Σ induce surjections on π
1. X(N ): the character variety for a manifold N
i.e., the set of characters of SL(2,
C)representations of π
1(N ).
Then we have the following diagram:
X(Σ) = X(W
1)
∩X(W
2)
→X(W
1)
↓ ↓
X(W
2)
→X(F )
NOTE: X(N ) have the structure of complex affine algebraic set.
3 / 16
SL(2, C ) Casson invariant
X
∗(Γ): the subspace of characters of irreducible representations.
• There exist a compact neighborhoodU of thezero-dimensional components ofX∗(W1)∩X∗(W2)⊂X∗(F)which is disjoint from the higher dimensional components of the intersection, and
• an isotopyh:X∗(F)→X∗(F)supported inU such that h(X∗(W1))andX∗(W2)intersect transversely inU.
Given a zero-dimensional component{χ}ofh(X∗(W1))∩X∗(W2), we setεχ=±1, depending on whether the orientation ofh(X∗(W1)) followed by that ofX∗(W2)agrees with the orientation ofX∗(F)atχ.
Definition. (SL(2, C ) Casson invariant) Define λ
SL(2,C)(Σ) =
Pχ
ε
χ, where the sum is taken over all the
zero-dimensional components of h(X
∗(W
1))
∩X
∗(W
2).
Surgery formula
For a knot K in a closed 3–manifold Σ, we denote by
Σp/q(K)the 3–manifold obtained by Dehn surgery on K along slope p/q.
Surgery formula of λ
SL(2,C)Suppose K is a small knot in an integral homology 3-sphere Σ.
Then, there exists E
0, E
1 ∈ 12Z≥0depending only on K such that for every admissible slope p/q, we have
λ
SL(2,C)(Σ
p/q(K )) = 1
2
kp/qkCS−E
σ(p).
Here
kp/qkCSis the
total Culler-Shalen seminormof the slope p/q and σ(p)
≡p (mod 2).
5 / 16
Total Culler-Shalen seminorm
Suppose K is a small knot in an integral homology 3-sphere Σ with complement M.
I
ξ: X(M )
→Ca function for each ξ
∈H
1(∂M ;
Z) by using H
1(∂M ;
Z)∼= π
1(∂M ) and I
γ(χ) = χ(γ) for γ
∈π
1(M ).
f
ξ: X(M )
→Cthe regular function defined by
f
ξ= I
ξ−2 for ξ
∈H
1(∂M ;
Z).
r : X(M )
→X(∂M ) the map induced by π
1(∂M )
→π
1M.
Total Culler-Shalen seminorm
Let{Xi} be the collection of all one-dimensional components ofX(M) such thatdimr(Xi) = 1andXi∩X∗(M)6=∅.
fi,ξ:Xi →C the regular function obtained by restrictingfξ toXi. For the smooth, projective curveXei birationally equivalent toXi, denote the natural extension offi,ξ toXei by f˜i,ξ:Xei→CP1 . For suchXi, define the seminormk · ki onH1(∂M;R)by setting
kξki= deg( ˜fi,ξ) for allξin the latticeH1(∂M;Z).
Definition. (the total Culler-Shalen seminorm)
kp/qkCS=X
i
mikp/qki
wheremi>0is the intersection multiplicity ofXi as a curve in the intersectionX∗(W1)·X∗(W2)inX(F).
7 / 16
Admissible slope
Admissible slope
A slope p/q on ∂M is called admissible for a knot K if
1.
p/q is a
regularslope which is not a strict
boundary slope;2.
No p
0-th root of unity is a root of the Alexander polynomial of K , where p
0= p if p is odd and p
0= p/2 if p is even.
Regular slope
A slope
γon ∂M is called regular if there are no irreducible representation ρ : π
1(M)
→SL(2,
C) satisfying that
1.
the character χ
ρlies on a one-dimensional component X
iof X(M ) such that r(X
i) is one-dimensional;
2.
trρ(α) =
±2for all α in the image of i
∗: π
1(∂M )
→π
1(M );
3.
ker(ρ
◦i
∗) is the cyclic group generated by [γ]
∈π
1(∂M ).
Cosmetic surgery conjecture
Conjecture. (Problem 1.81(A) in Kirby’s list)
Two surgeries on inequivalent slopes are never purely cosmetic.
•
Two slopes for a knot K are called equivalent
if
∃homeo. of the exterior of K taking one slope to the other.
•
Two surgeries on K are called
purely cosmeticif
∃orientation preserving homeo. between the manifolds obtained by the surgeries.
Remark: There exists some example of knots admitting
“chirally” cosmetic surgeries along inequivalent slopes.
9 / 16
Boundary slopes & Cosmetic surgeries Let K be a small knot in an integral homology sphere Σ, and
BKbe the boundary slope set of K (B
K ∈Q).Fact.(c.f. Culler-Luecke-Gordon-Shalen)
∃wj ≥
0 such that
||γ||CS= 2
Xβj∈BK
w
j∆(γ, β
j).
Proposition. (I.-Saito, in progress) If
BK ∈Z≥0, then
λ
SL(2,C)(Σ
r(K)))
6=λ
SL(2,C)(Σ
−r(K))
for admissible slopes r,
−r. In particular, ifΣ = S
3, such a knot
K have no purely cosmetic surgeries along admissible slopes.
2-bridge knots
Proposition. (2-bridge knots with at most 9 crossings) All the two-bridge knots of at most 9 crossings
other than 9
27admits no cosmetic surgery pairs.
Remark: 9
27= S(49, 19) = C[2, 2,
−2,2, 2,
−2]11 / 16
Family including 9
27Theorem. [I.-Saito] (A family including 9
27)
Let K
xbe a 2-bridge knot C[2x, 2
−2x, 2x, 2,
−2x]with x
≥1.
Then K
xadmits no cosmetic surgeries yielding homology 3-spheres.
i.e., any
n1- and
m1-surgeries are not purely cosmetic for K
x. Remark:
For K
x, the known restrictions cannot be applied.
(original Casson invariant & Heegaard Floer homology)
Surgery formula for 2-bridge knots
Boden-Curtis (2012)
Let K = S(α, β) be a 2-bridge knot and K(p/q) the 3-manifold obtained by p/q-surgery on K. Suppose that p/q is admissible.
Then
λ
SL(2,C)(K(p/q)) =
(12kp/qkCS
if p is even,
1
2kp/qkCS−
(α
−1)/4 if p is odd.
Boden-Curtis (2012)
All slopes are regular for a 2-bridge knot.
13 / 16
Culler-Shalen norm & Ohtsuki’s method
Boden-Curtis, based on Ohtsuki (1994)
||p/q||CS
= 1
2
−|p|+
Xi
W
i∆(p/q, N
i)
!
Here N
1,
· · ·, N
ndenotes the boundary slope for K, and W
i:=
Qj
(|n
j| −1) for the continued fraction expansion [n
1,
· · ·, n
m] associated to N
i.
T. Ohtsuki, Ideal points and incompressible surfaces in two- bridge knot complements, J. Math. Soc. Japan
46(1994), no. 1, 51–87.
Computing Boundary slope
Mattman-Maybrun-Robinson (2008)
The boundary slopes of S(α, β) are associated to the continued fractions obtained by applying the substitutions at non-adjacent positions in the simple continued fraction of α/β.
Substitution 1:
[b0,2b1, b2, b3, . . . , bn]7→[b0+ 1,(−2,2)b1−1,−2, b2+ 1, b3, . . . , bn] Substitution 2:
[b0,2b1+ 1, b2, b3, . . . , bn]7→[b0+ 1,(−2,2)b1,−b2−1,−b3, . . . ,−bn]
Recall: The simple continued fraction is the unique one with all terms positive and greater than 1.
T. W. Mattman, G. Maybrun and K. Robinson, 2-bridge knot bound- ary slopes: diameter and genus, Osaka J. Math. 45(2008), 471–489.
15 / 16
Recent progress
Theorem. [I.-Zhongtao Wu]
Let V
K(t) be the Jones polynomial of a knot K in S
3. If a knot K satisfies either V
K00(1)
6= 0or V
K000(1)
6= 0,
then K(r) K(r
0) as oriented mfds. for distinct slopes r and r
0. Lescop’s λ
2invariant (2009)
The invariant
λ2:= W
2◦Z
2, where W
2is a linear form on
Anwith W
2( ) = 1 and W
2( ) = 0.
An
: the vector space generated by Jacobi diagrams of degree n subject to AS and IHX relations
Zn