トップページ - 横浜国立大学学術情報リポジトリ
全文
(2) Js2. Masao'Maeda. 3 Surfaces of revolution in E3 , In the fbllowing, let M alway's denotes a Si-invariant Riemannian manifold diffeomorphic to a 2dimensional sphere S2 and (s,e) be a polar coordinate such as stated in sectione 2. We also use the same notations stated in section 2. Let ip: M - E3' be an isometric imbeding which is a surface of revelu・tion.. Then ip is given・ as ,, , gb(s,e)=(f(s),h(s)sine,h(s)cQse). for (s, e) E U(O <s< L,O Se< 2T). f and hsatisfies the fbllowimg conditions; , tt t. (a) f'(s)2 + h'(s)2 = 1. (b) h(s) = a(s) (c) f is monotone increasing. ' CQndition ('c) means: that ip i's a:'su'rface of rev61'utiort aro'urid the x--axii an, d (a),(b) means, that di is o,metrc. Frrom (a),,(b),(, e), we ean get precise 'expression of di stated in section 2. '. is'. Now, we consider a mapping ip:M - E3 defined by. ・ th(s,e)=(f(s),h(s)sine,h(s)cose) for (s,e)(,e < s < L,O .<-' e < 2' T)' where f and h satisfie$ the fo11owing conditions;. (a) f'(s)2' +- h'(s')"'.2' --- 1. (b) h(s) = a(s) IFbr cb, we don!t・ reqtiire to ,satisfy j is 'mbnOton,e. i・n.creasing. So imbeddabi'Iity 6f'th does not・ guarantee irr. gen'ar' aL th is an isometri'c. immersion' and, may has interseetion points. But thanks to no requirement of the ・condit'ion that f is monotone increasing, immersion. th : M --i E3 ean get smoothness of class C2' for. certain, Si-invariant manifoId M, .. Note that c(s) = ¢(s,O) is a curve in x -- z plane and cb(M) is a surface given by the rotation Qf. ・the curve c(s) around x-axis. If c('s)' is a graphJof certain function z = h(x), then th(M) i・s a surface・Qf revolution sround x-axis in E3, So, we will call ¢' 'as a revolutionlike immersion. Our assertion is the following,. Theorem LetMbeaSi-invariantRiemannianmanlpldwhichisdwfeomomphictoS2anda=a(s) the function dofned in section 2. ij la'(s)l S1 for all s;OSs <- L and the number of poits s'= so at whieh lat(so.)・1 = 1 is finite, then 'there exists a revolutionlike immersion th. :- M - E3' which・is of class C2.,. Proof Asisstatedbefore,a=a('s)canbeextendedsmoothlyon(-cx),oo)asaperiodicfunction with period 2L. Let {s'i}-oo<i<oo ,; ''' < s・-n-i(= -2L + Sn-1) < s-n(= -L ''i': ptSit) < s-n+1(=. 'Sn-1) <'''< S-1(= '-Si) < So =O < Sl < S2 <'''< Sn-1 < Sn(= L) < Sn+1(= 2L - sn-1> <''' be the sequence of points satisfying la'(si)l = 1 Now,we define f t' [Q,si] -・ R by. f(s)=LS 1--a'(u)2du ' = O. Since a is defined op (--oo,oo), we fbr s E [O,si]. f is smooth on (O,si) and satisfies lims.o+ f'(s). can extendfon [-si,si]. ForsE [-si,so], f(s)' is given as, ' f(s)=-LS i-a'(u)2du . '. This extended f' satisfies lim..o. ,ft(s) = O.. Lemma1 f(s)isdopderentiableats=Oandf'(O)=O.
(3) ON ISOMETRJC.IMIVffiRSIONS OFSi-INM4s,RIANT MANIFOLDS 53. Proof Bythemeanvaluetheoremforintegral, !(,) = (-ii-a"£・9i,);,g,i fo;,S,O(l.7e.e, ;,9,<,e.`,} .' 'if .) ,O.',. g.hgSh.kiiO.) .--.liMf,?gs)--!.+oStlSitlsf,.(6)limAs-÷o+ i -- a'(eA.s)2 = o・ Aisg we have iL(o) = iim...,- tx.Ei =.. ・ ・.m. ' is of class Ci on , From L'emma 1, we knew f is of class' Ci on (--si,si).; Successibly, we will show f' Fbr s E (-si,si) r {O}, f'(s) is 'diffbre.ntiable and. fl'(S)=(:1,(isi)S..a)1"i'(i)/S2 ',S<>oO. '. Lemma2 f'(s)・i;・dof)i3rentia.bleatS=Oand. '. tttt ' ' f"(Q)= -a"'(O). Proof RightdifferentialcoeMci'ent'off'ats=Ocanbeealculatedas. ' "(o) == ,.li.m. .. f'(ASIsii, f'(O) '= .},t.ns.., i-Aa,l.(AS)2 (i> Since a'(O) == 1,a"(O) = O because a'(s) attains maximum at s = O. Thus there exists smooth function k near s = O satisfying. . a' (s) =1+ s2k(s) (2). '. k satisfies k(O) = a"'(O)12(-< O). Substituting ℃his in (1), we have. ' .'lttm,'. i'Aa,'(AS)2・='...ii.m,+,i+a'(As) -k(As)lfil,li,l-=/--a"t(o) '. Sim'ilarly,wehave ''. ./. tt. '. f!'"(e)=.}i.m,-' i'-A-a,'(AS)2 =.ltt,-.- i+at(As) -k(A,s)[21f'i = '-at"(o)' Thusf4L'(O)=fL'(Q),== -att,(o).. '. ' -d. '. Lemma3 lim.-o.f"(s)=lim..o.f"(s)=fi'(o) ' Proof Sincea"(s)=.1+s2k(s)by(2), , ' Thus' .fb'S''>O". a"('s) :2sk(s)+s2k'(.s). '. f,.(,)..,' i+-".l' ,s))a' i(s--)zi,(i)=a'(S)i2i-.k,((.S))v)i=E;(gil-Sk'(S)) ((. So. '. .,.ll'{:iF..f"'(s),==VSx/:'wtiii= -a,tt(o).
(4) x. 54. Masao Maeda. Similarly, we have. lim f"(s)= -a'"(O) s-+O-. o , From Lemma 2 and Lemma 3, we see f' is of class Ci and hence f is of class C2 on (-si,si), By the same way, we exPend f on [-si,s2] as. f(,).LSi 1-a'(u)2du-L,S 1-a'(u)2du ' for s C [si,s2]. Then. f'(s)-("ny,!Z,7;gS,)2 ,2i,fs<s2. and f'(si) = O by the same reason as in Lemma 1. We also hEvve f"(s)=(llll/iiliiil£i(-.i)i, S,i<<,S,<S2. ' ' Since ia'(si,)i = 1, a"'(si) = O.1 and henge. there exists a smooth function k = k(s) 'near s, = s.i satisfying. '. ''. '. '. a'(s)=±1+(s-sD2k(s),k(si)=a'"(sD/2 ' '. So, by the same argument for' so = O,' we have. '. Lemma4 fT(s)isdifferentiableats=siand f"(si)=(: .;,3i'iiS," .,2g(S,il=--',. Lemma5 IiM..,,+f"(s)==lim...,"f"(s)=f"(si> From Lemma 4 and Lemma 5, we see f' is of class Ci' and hence' f is of dlass C2 on (・-si,s2). Successively, we extend f' in the,$.ame w'ay as above as a function f:(---oo,oe) - R. f is given as. ' t/ ''Jti"'1-a'(u)2du---JX2i:a'(u)2du+'";・・+(=-1)i:'"'iX,../1'--a'(u)Sdu,. i' ' f(S)= LJU"-'・ i--a,(u}2du+',c7r,3 i±.,(.)2du+...-F(-i)ji,ft:,,i.-,f[Sf'-.-.i'.S,l'].f),Odr.?OMei'-i. ' ifsE[s,1.r,s,・]forsome2'm<O f ・satisfies the fo11owing:. ' ' Proposition 6 f:(-oo,oo) --> R is s periodic even (i.e, f(s) = f(--s) for all s) function with period 2L and of class C2'. Fbr eabh i; --oo <i < bdJ'(si) =' O and. f"(si)-([:lii .;,{'ilii' .,?gi;zl=-=i,. Proof The periodicity and the evenness of f cQmeS from the periOdicity of a and the evenness of the function 1 -- a'(s)2 respectively. f'(si) and f"(si) are calculated as in the proof of Lemma 1, Lemma 2. and Le.mma 3; ' '' '. Ftom Proposition 6, we have a revolution' like immersion th:M - E3 which is of class C2,. o.
(5) ON ISOMETRIC IMMERSIONS OFSi-INVARIANT MANIFOLDS 55 ' ' tt ' ' Q・EeD・ By relaxing the condition for s surface of revolution, we had a revolutionlike immersion which is of class C2. To make sure of the precise differentiability of this immersion is an int'erestiong problem. Is. thereexistsanintegerr;r23satisfyingthisimmersionisstillofclassCr. -. References . [1] A,Besse, Manofolds All of VWiose Geodesics are Closed,Springer-Ve;lag,Berlin,1978. [2] M.Engman, A IVbte on isometric Embedding of Suofaces of Revotution, Amer. Math. Month,,March. '. [3] M.Maeda and T.Otsuki, Models ef the Riemannian Manofblds 03 in the Lorentzian 4-space, J:Diff.Geom.,9(1974),97-108 [4] K.Shiohama,T.Shioya and M.Tanaka, T7ie GeometTlt of 1lotal Curvature on C6mplete Open Suf:faces,. Cambridge Univ,Press,2003 .・.
(6)
関連したドキュメント
Kartsatos, The existence of bounded solutions on the real line of perturbed non- linear evolution equations in general Banach spaces, Nonlinear Anal.. Kreulich, Eberlein weak
After briefly summarizing basic notation, we present the convergence analysis of the modified Levenberg-Marquardt method in Section 2: Section 2.1 is devoted to its well-posedness
Then the strongly mixed variational-hemivariational inequality SMVHVI is strongly (resp., weakly) well posed in the generalized sense if and only if the corresponding inclusion
We study the classical invariant theory of the B´ ezoutiant R(A, B) of a pair of binary forms A, B.. We also describe a ‘generic reduc- tion formula’ which recovers B from R(A, B)
Key words and phrases: Quasianalytic ultradistributions; Convolution of ultradistributions; Translation-invariant Banach space of ultradistribu- tions; Tempered
We formalize and extend this remark in Theorem 7.4 below which shows that the spectral flow of the odd signature operator coupled to a path of flat connections on a manifold
p≤x a 2 p log p/p k−1 which is proved in Section 4 using Shimura’s split of the Rankin–Selberg L -function into the ordinary Riemann zeta-function and the sym- metric square
For B a com- pact, orientable surface, the main theorem of this paper gives a necessary and sufficient condition on the cohomology class corresponding to ξ for E to admit a