• 検索結果がありません。

OFF A COMPLEX CURVE

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "OFF A COMPLEX CURVE"

Copied!
8
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

L

p

OFF A COMPLEX CURVE

RABAH KHALDI

Received 29 September 2003 and in revised form 15 June 2004

We study the asymptotic behavior ofLp(σ) extremal polynomials with respect to a mea- sure of the formσ=α+γ, whereαis a measure concentrated on a rectifiable Jordan curve in the complex plane andγis a discrete measure concentrated on an infinite number of mass points.

1. Introduction

LetFbe a compact subset of the complex planeCand letBbe a metric space of func- tions defined onF. We suppose thatBcontains the set of monic polynomials. Then the extremal or general Chebyshev polynomialTn of degreen is a monic polynomial that minimizes the distance between zero and the set of all monic polynomials of degreen, that is,

distTn, 0=mindistQn, 0:Qn(z)=zn+an1zn1+···+a0

=mn(B). (1.1) Recently, a series of results concerning the asymptotic of the extremal polynomials was established for the case ofB=Lp(F,σ), 1p≤ ∞, whereσis a Borel measure onF; see, for example, [3,7,8,12]. Whenp=2, we have the special case of orthogonal polynomials with respect to the measureσ. A lot of research work has been done on this subject; see, for example, [1,4,5,9,11,13]. The case of the spacesLp(F,σ), where 0< p <and F is a closed rectifiable Jordan curve with some smoothness conditions, was studied by Geronimus [2]. An extension of Geronimus’s result has been given by Kaliaguine [3] who found asymptotics when 0< p <and the measureσhas a decomposition of the form

σ=α+γ, (1.2)

whereαis a measure supported on a closed rectifiable Jordan curveEas defined in [2]

andγis a discrete measure with a finite number of mass points.

In this paper, we generalize Kaliaguine’s work [3] in the case where 1p <and the support of the measureσ is a rectifiable Jordan curveEplus an infinite discrete set of

Copyright©2004 Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Applied Mathematics 2004:5 (2004) 371–378 2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 42C05, 30E15, 30E10 URL:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/S1110757X0430906X

(2)

mass points which accumulate onE. More precisely,σ=α+γ, where the measureαand its supportEare defined as in [3], that is,

dα(ξ)=ρ(ξ)||, ρ0,ρL1E,||

; (1.3)

γ is a discrete measure concentrated on{zk}k=1Ext(E) (Ext(E) is the exterior ofE), that is,

γ=

+

k=1

Akδzzk

, Ak>0,

+

k=1

Ak<. (1.4)

Note that the result of the special casep=2 is also a generalization of [4]. More pre- cisely, in the proof ofTheorem 4.3, we show that condition [4, page 265, (17)] imposed on the points{zk}k=1is redundant.

2. TheHp(Ω,ρ)spaces (1p <)

LetEbe a rectifiable Jordan curve in the complex plane,Ω=Ext(E),G= {zC,|z|>1} (belongs toΩandG).

We denote byΦthe conformal mapping ofΩintoGwithΦ()= ∞and 1/C(E)= limz→∞(Φ(z)/z)>0, whereC(E) is the logarithmic capacity ofE. We denoteΨ=Φ1.

Letρbe an integrable nonnegative weight function onEsatisfying the Szeg¨o condition

E

logρ(ξ)Φ(ξ)||>−∞. (2.1) Condition (2.1) allows us to construct the so-called Szeg¨o functionDassociated with the curveEand the weight functionρ:

D(z)=exp

1 2

+π

π

w+eit

weitlog ρ(ξ) Φ(ξ)

dt

w=Φ(z),ξ=Ψeit (2.2) such that

(i)Dis analytic inΩ,D(z)=0 inΩ, andD()>0;

(ii)|D(ξ)|p|Φ(ξ)| =ρ(ξ) a.e. onE, whereD(ξ)=limzξD(z).

We say that f Hp(Ω,ρ) if and only if f is analytic inΩand f0Ψ/D0ΨHp(G).

For 1p <,Hp(Ω,ρ) is a Banach space. Each functionf Hp(Ω,ρ) has limit val- ues a.e. onEand

f Hpp(Ω,ρ)=

E

f(ξ)pρ(ξ)|| = lim

R1+

1 R

ER

f(z)p D(z)p

Φ(z)dz, (2.3)

whereER= {zΩ:|Φ(z)| =R}.

Lemma2.1 [3]. If f Hp(Ω,ρ), then for every compact setK, there is a constantCK such that

supf(z):zKCK f Hp(,ρ). (2.4)

(3)

3. The extremal problems

Let 1p <; we denoteσl=α+lk=1Akδ(zzk) and byµ(ρ), µ(l), µ(ρ),mn,p(ρ), mn,p(l), andmn,p(σ) the extremal values of the following problems, respectively:

µ(ρ)=inf ϕ Hpp(,ρ):ϕHp(Ω,ρ), ϕ()=1, (3.1) µ(l)=inf ϕ Hpp(,ρ):ϕHp(Ω,ρ), ϕ()=1,ϕzk

=0,k=1, 2,...,l, (3.2) µ(ρ)=inf ϕ Hpp(,ρ):ϕHp(Ω,ρ), ϕ()=1,ϕzk

=0,k=1, 2,..., (3.3) mn,p(ρ)=minQn

Lp(α):Qn(z)=zn+···

, (3.4)

mn,p(l)=minQnLp(σl):Qn(z)=zn+···

, (3.5)

mn,p(σ)=minQnLp(σ):Qn(z)=zn+···

. (3.6)

As usual,

f Lp(σ):=

E

f(ξ)pdσ(ξ) 1/ p

. (3.7)

We denote byϕandψthe extremal functions of problems (3.1) and (3.3), respec- tively.

LetTnl,p(z) andTn,p(z) be the extremal polynomials with respect to the measuresσl andσ, respectively, that is,

Tn,pl Lp(σl)=mn,p(l), Tn,p

Lp(σ)=mn,p(σ). (3.8) Lemma3.1. LetϕHp(Ω,ρ)such thatϕ()=1andϕ(zk)=0fork=1, 2,...,and let

B(z)=

+

k=1

Φ(z)Φzk Φ(z)Φzk

1

Φzk2

Φzk (3.9)

be the Blaschke product. Then

(i)BHp(Ω,ρ),B()=1,|B(ξ)| =+

k=1|Φ(zk)|E);

(ii)ϕ/BHp(Ω,ρ)and(ϕ/B)()=1.

Proof. This lemma is proved forp=2 in [1]. The proof is based on the fact that if f H2(U), whereU= {zC,|z|<1}, andBis the Blaschke product formed by the zeros of f, thenf /BH2(U). It remains true inHp(U) for 1p <; see [6,10].

(4)

Lemma3.2. An extremal functionψof problem (3.3) is given byψ=ϕB; in addition, µ(ρ)=

+

k=1

Φzkpµ(ρ). (3.10)

Proof. IfϕHp(Ω,ρ), ϕ()=1 and ϕ(zk)=0 for k=1, 2,....Then by Lemma 2.1, we have f =ϕ/BHp(Ω,ρ), f()=1, and|B(ξ)| =+

k=1|Φ(zk)|forξE. These lead to

f p=

+

k=1

Φzkp

ϕ p. (3.11)

Thus

µ(ρ)

+

k=1

Φzk p

µ(ρ). (3.12)

On the other hand, since the functionψ=ϕBHp(Ω,ρ),ϕ()=1 andϕ(zk)= 0 fork=1, 2,..., we get

µ(ρ)ψp=

+

k=1

Φzkp

µ(ρ). (3.13)

Finally, the lemma follows from (3.12) and (3.13).

4. The main results

Definition 4.1. A measureσ=α+γis said to belong to a classAif the absolutely contin- uous partαand the discrete partγsatisfy conditions (1.3), (1.4), and (2.1) and Blaschke’s condition, that is,

+

k=1

Φzk1<. (4.1)

We denoteλn=ΦnΦn, whereΦnis the polynomial part of the Laurent expansion ofΦnin the neighborhood of infinity.

Definition 4.2[2]. A rectifiable curveEis said to be of classΓifλn(ξ)0 uniformly onE.

Theorem4.3. Let a measureσ=α+γsatisfy conditions (1.3), (1.4) and Blaschke’s condi- tion (4.1); then

llim+mn,p(l)=mn,p(σ). (4.2)

(5)

Proof. The extremal property ofTn,p(zk) gives mn,p(σ)p

E

Tnl,p(ξ)pρ(ξ)||+ l k=1

AkTnl,p

zkp+

+

k=l+1

AkTnl,p

zkp

=

mn,p(l)p+

+

k=l+1

AkTnl,p

zkp.

(4.3)

On the other hand, from the extremal property ofTnl,p(zk), we can write mn,p(l)

E

Tn,p(ξ)pρ(ξ)||+ l k=1

AkTn,p

zkp1/ p

mn,p(σ)=Cn<.

(4.4)

Note thatCndoes not depend onl; so for alll=1, 2, 3,...,

E

Tnl,p(ξ)pρ(ξ)|| 1/ p

< Cn. (4.5)

This implies that there is a constantCnindependent oflsuch that for alll=1, 2, 3,..., maxTnl,p(z)p:|z| ≤2< Cn. (4.6) Using (4.6) in (4.3) for large enoughlwith (4.4), we get

mn,p(l)p

mn,p(σ)p

mn,p(l)p+Cn

+

k=l+1

Ak. (4.7)

Lettingl→ ∞, we obtain

llim→∞mn,p(l)=mn,p(σ). (4.8) Theorem4.4. Let1p <,EΓ, and letσ=α+γbe a measure which belongs toA. In addition, for allnandl,

mn,p(l) l

k=1

Φzk

mn,p(ρ). (4.9)

Then the monic orthogonal polynomialsTn,p(z)with respect to the measureσ have the following asymptotic behavior:

(i) limn→∞(mn,p(σ)/(C(E))n)=(ρ))1/ p; (ii) limn→∞ Tn,p/[C(E)Φ]nψ Hp(Ω,ρ)=0;

(iii)Tn,p(z)=[C(E)Φ(z)]n(z) +εn(z)],

where εn(z)0 uniformly on compact subsets ofand ψ is an extremal function of problem (3.3).

(6)

Remark 4.5. For p=2 andEthe unit circle, condition (4.9) is proved (see [5, Theorem 5.2]). In this case, this condition can be written asγnlnl

k=1|zk|, whereγln=1/mn,2(l) andγn=1/mn,2(ρ) are, respectively, the leading coefficients of the orthonormal polyno- mials associated to the measuresσlandα.

Proof ofTheorem 4.4. Taking the limit whenltends to infinity in (4.9) and usingTheorem 4.3, we get

mn,p(σ) C(E)n

+

k=1

Φzk

mn,p(ρ)

C(E)n. (4.10)

On the other hand, it is proved in [2] that

nlim→∞

mn,p(ρ) C(E)n=

µ(ρ)1/ p. (4.11)

Using (4.10), (4.11), andLemma 3.2, we obtain

lim sup

n→∞

mn,p(σ) C(E)n

+

k=1

Φzk

µ(ρ)1/ p=

µ(ρ)1/ p. (4.12)

It is well known that (see [3, page 231])

l >0, µ(l)=µ(ρ) l k=1

Φzk p

. (4.13)

We also have (see [3, Theorem 2.2])

nlim→∞

mn,p(l) C(E)n=

µ(l)1/ p. (4.14)

From (4.4), we deduce that

l >0, mn,p(σ) C(E)n

mn,p(l)

C(E)n. (4.15)

By passing to the limit whenntends to infinity in (4.15) and taking into account (4.13) and (4.14), we get

l >0, lim inf

n→∞

mn,p(σ) C(E)n

l k=1

Φzk

µ(ρ)1/ p. (4.16)

(7)

Finally, by usingLemma 3.2, we obtain

lim inf

n→∞

mn,p(σ) C(E)n

+

k=1

Φzk

µ(ρ)1/ p=

µ(σ)1/ p. (4.17)

Inequalities (4.12) and (4.17) proveTheorem 4.4(i).

We obtain (ii) by proceeding as in [3, pages 234, 235].

To prove (iii), we consider the function εn= Tn,p

C(E)Φnψ (4.18)

which belongs to the spaceHp(Ω,ρ). Then by applyingLemma 2.1, we obtain

sup Tn,p(z)

C(E)Φ(z)nψ(z):zK

=supεn(z):zKCKεnHp(,ρ)−→0

(4.19)

for all compact subsetsKofΩ. This achieves the proof of the theorem.

References

[1] R. Benzine,Asymptotic behavior of orthogonal polynomials corresponding to a measure with infi- nite discrete part offa curve, J. Approx. Theory89(1997), no. 2, 257–265.

[2] Y. L. Geronimus,On some extremal problems in the spaceL(p)σ , Mat. Sb. (N.S.)31(73)(1952), 3–26 (Russian).

[3] V. Kaliaguine,On asymptotics ofLpextremal polynomials on a complex curve(0< p <), J.

Approx. Theory74(1993), no. 2, 226–236.

[4] R. Khaldi and R. Benzine,On a generalization of an asymptotic formula of orthogonal polynomi- als, Int. J. Appl. Math.4(2000), no. 3, 261–274.

[5] ,Asymptotics for orthogonal polynomials offthe circle, J. Appl. Math.2004(2004), no. 1, 37–53.

[6] P. Koosis,Introduction toHpSpaces, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, vol. 40, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1980.

[7] X. Li and K. Pan,Asymptotics forLpextremal polynomials on the unit circle, J. Approx. Theory 67(1991), no. 3, 270–283.

[8] D. S. Lubinsky and E. B. Saff,Strong asymptotics forLpextremal polynomials(1< p≤ ∞)as- sociated with weights on[1, 1], Approximation Theory (Tampa, Fla, 1985-1986), Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 1287, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987, pp. 83–104.

[9] F. Peherstorfer and P. Yuditskii,Asymptotics of orthonormal polynomials in the presence of a denumerable set of mass points, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc.129(2001), no. 11, 3213–3220.

[10] W. Rudin,Real and Complex Analysis, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1966.

[11] G. Szeg¨o,Orthogonal Polynomials, 4th ed., American Mathematical Society Colloquium Publi- cations, vol. 23, American Mathematical Society, Rhode Island, 1975.

[12] J. P. Tiran and C. Detaille,Chebychev polynomials on a circular arc in the complex plane, preprint, 1990, Namur University, Belgium.

(8)

[13] H. Widom,Extremal polynomials associated with a system of curves in the complex plane, Ad- vances in Math.3(1969), 127–232.

Rabah Khaldi: Department of Mathematics, University of Annaba, P.O. Box 12, 23000 Annaba, Algeria

E-mail address:[email protected]

参照

関連したドキュメント

In summary by using a σ-invariance to simplify the Krichever–Novikov system, we have con- structed a pair of commuting differential operators L 1 in (19) and L 2 in (23) of rank 3

Voulov, “On the periodic nature of the solutions of the reciprocal difference equation with max- imum,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol. Voulov, “On

Then clearly (R,) is a topological space and it is clear that the space is KC-space as well as H-space.. But the space is not

The following example shows that in the property of being H-space is non- hereditary property.... Example and the following example shows that a H-space and a

By obtaining a priori upper bound of the nonnegative periodic solutions of the corresponding periodic diffusion system, we establish the existence of the maximum periodic solution

Hsien, “New sufficient conditions for the stability of continuous and discrete time- delay interval systems,” Journal of the Franklin Institute, vol. Tung, “Stability analysis

The purpose of this paper is that the good asymptotic behavior concept may also be taken over a convex subset instead of the whole space, in a sense that, every stationary sequence of

In section 3, we state some results on the large time behavior of subsonic solutions (for classical solutions in section 3.1 and for subsonic shock solutions in