• 検索結果がありません。

FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN GENERATING SPACES OF QUASI-NORM FAMILY AND APPLICATIONS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "FIXED POINT THEOREMS IN GENERATING SPACES OF QUASI-NORM FAMILY AND APPLICATIONS"

Copied!
10
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

QUASI-NORM FAMILY AND APPLICATIONS

JIAN-ZHONG XIAO AND XING-HUA ZHU Received 11 April 2005; Accepted 21 November 2005

Some new concepts of generating spaces of quasi-norm family are introduced and their linear topological structures are studied. These spaces are not necessarily locally convex.

By virtue of some properties in these spaces, several Schauder-type fixed point theorems are proved, which include the corresponding theorems in locally convex spaces as their special cases. As applications, some new fixed point theorems in Menger probabilistic normed spaces and fuzzy normed spaces are obtained.

Copyright © 2006 J.-Z. Xiao and X.-H. Zhu. This is an open access article distributed un- der the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribu- tion, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Introduction

The Schauder fixed point theorem and its generalizations which were obtained by Kras- noselskii et al. (see [3,5], we call them the Schauder-type fixed point theorems), play important role in nonlinear analysis. In classical case, many interesting extensions and important applications of these theorems were presented by Fan [1] and others. In non- classical case, several extensions of these theorems in Menger probabilistic normed spaces were given under some conditions by Zhang-Guo [11] and Lin [6]. Naturally, a subject is to consider their unified extensions both in classical case and in nonclassical case. In this paper, we introduce some new concepts of generating spaces of quasi-norm family, and establish some new unified versions of Schauder-type fixed point theorems in more general setting. As applications, we also study the existence problems concerning the fixed points for operators on Menger probabilistic normed space and fuzzy normed space. Our results contain not only the former versions of the Schauder-type fixed point theorems but also the corresponding theorems in Menger probabilistic normed spaces and fuzzy normed spaces as their special cases.

2. Fixed point theorems in generating spaces of quasi-norm family

Throughout this paper we denote the set of all positive integers byZ+and the field of real or complex numbers byE.

Hindawi Publishing Corporation Fixed Point Theory and Applications Volume 2006, Article ID 61623, Pages1–10 DOI10.1155/FPTA/2006/61623

(2)

Definition 2.1. LetXbe a linear space overEandθthe origin ofX. Let Q=

| · |α:α(0, 1] (2.1) be a family of mappings fromXinto [0, +). (X,Q) is called a generating space of quasi- norm family andQa quasi-norm family if the following conditions are satisfied:

(QN-1)|x|α=0 for allα(0, 1] if and only ifx=θ;

(QN-2)|ex|α= |e||x|αforxXandeE;

(QN-3) for anyα(0, 1] there exists aβ(0,α] such that

|x+y|α≤ |x|β+|y|β forx,yX; (2.2) (QN-4) for anyxX,|x|αis non-increasing and left-continuous forα(0, 1].

(X,Q) is called a generating space of sub-strong quasi-norm family, strong quasi-norm family and semi-norm family respectively, if (QN-3) is strengthened to (QN-3u), (QN- 3t) and (QN-3e), where

(QN-3u) for anyα(0, 1] there exists aβ(0,α] such that

n i=1

xi

α

n i=1

xiβ for anynZ+,xiX(i=1, 2,...,n); (2.3)

(QN-3t) for anyα(0, 1] there exists aβ(0,α] such that

|x+y|α≤ |x|α+|y|β forx,yX; (2.4) (QN-3e) for anyα(0, 1], it holds that|x+y|α≤ |x|α+|y|αforx,yX.

Remark 2.2. Clearly, byDefinition 2.1we obtain the following assertions: (QN-3e) im- plies (QN-3t); (QN-3t) and (QN-4) imply (QN-3u); (QN-3u) implies (QN-3).

Lemma 2.3. Let (X,Q) be a generating space of quasi-norm family,ε >0,α(0, 1],N(ε,α)

= {x:|x|α< ε}. Then

(i)e=0 implieseN(1,α)=N(|e|,α);

(ii)ε1ε2impliesN1,α)N(ε2,α);

(iii)α1α2impliesN(ε,α1)N(ε,α2).

Proof. It follows immediately from (QN-2) and (QN-4).

Lemma 2.4. Let (X,Q) be a generating space of quasi-norm family. Then there exists a topologyQonXsuch that (X,Q) is a first-countable Hausdorfflinear topological space (further, is metrizable) having{N(ε,α) :ε >0, α(0, 1]}as a neighbourhood base ofθ.

Additionally, if (X,Q) is a generating space of semi-norm family, then (X,Q) is a locally convex space.

Sketch of proof. ApplyingLemma 2.3, we have the following.

(a) ForN(ε11) andN(ε2,α2) there is aN(ε0,α0) such that Nε00

Nε1,α1

Nε2,α2

, (2.5)

(3)

where

ε0=α0=minε1122. (2.6) (b) ForN(ε,α), by (QN-3) and (QN-4), there is anN(ε/2,β) such that

N(ε/2,β) +N(ε/2,β)N(ε,α). (2.7)

(c) For anyeE,|e| ≤1, it holds thateN(ε,α)N(ε,α).

(d) For anyxX, there is ae=ε/(|x|α+ε)Esuch thatexN(ε,α).

(e) Forθ=xX, by (QN-1), there existα0(0, 1] andε0>0 such that

|x|α0> ε0, that is,x /Nε00

. (2.8)

(f){N(1/n, 1/n) :nZ+}is also a neighbourhood base ofθfor᐀Q. (g) If (X,Q) satisfies (QN-3e), thenN(ε,α) is convex.

Finally, by [4, pages 34-35, pages 45–49], the assertion is valid.

Remark 2.5. FromLemma 2.4we see that the topology᐀Q can be described using se- quence instead of net or filter.

Definition 2.6. Let (X,Q) be a generating space of quasi-norm family.

(i) A sequence{xn}n=1Xis said

(a) to converge toxXdenoted by limn→∞xn=xif limn→∞|xnx|α=0 for each α(0, 1] (equivalently, for eachα(0, 1] there is aKZ+such that|xn x|α< αfor allnK);

(b) to be a Cauchy sequence if limm,n→∞|xmxn|α=0 for eachα(0, 1].

(ii) A subsetBXis said

(a) to be complete if every Cauchy sequence inBconverges inB;

(b) to be bounded if for eachα(0, 1] there is a M=M(α)>0 such that B N(M,α);

(c) to be precompact (or totally bounded) if for eachα(0, 1] there existnαZ+ and{x,x,...,xnαα} ⊂Bsuch thatBnα

i=1x+N(α,α);

(d) to be compact if every open cover ofBhas a finite subcover.

(iii) An operatorT from BX intoX is said to be continuous if for each xB, limn→∞xn=ximplies limn→∞Txn=Tx.

Remark 2.7. FromDefinition 2.6andLemma 2.4we get the following immediately: ifB is compact, then it is precompact; IfBis precompact, then it is bounded; IfBis a subset of a precompact set, then it is also precompact.

Lemma 2.8. Let (X,Q) be a generating space of quasi-norm family.

(i) IfYXis a finite dimensional subspace ofX, thenY is topologically isomorphic to a finite dimensional Euclidean space and is therefore complete and closed inX.

(ii) A subset ofXis compact if and only if it is precompact and complete.

Proof. It follows fromLemma 2.4and [4, pages 59–61].

(4)

Lemma 2.9. Let (X,Q) be a generating space of strong quasi-norm family. Then for each α(0, 1],|x|αis a continuous function onX.

Proof. By (QN-3t), for{xn} ⊂XandxX, we have

|x|αxxnβ+xnα, xnαxnxβ+|x|α, (2.9) that is,||xn|α− |x|α| ≤ |xnx|β, showing the assertion is true.

In the sequel, we denote the closure of a setBbyB, the convex hull ofBby coBand the closure of the convex hull ofBby coB. Now, we give our main theorems.

Theorem 2.10. Let (X,Q) be a generating space of sub-strong quasi-norm family satisfying that each| · |αQis continuous onX,Ca compact convex subset ofXandTa continuous operator fromCintoC. Then there exists anx0Csuch thatTx0=x0.

Proof. FornZ+andαn(0, 1/n], by (QN-3u), there isβn(0,αn] such that

k i=1

xi

α

n

k i=1

xiβ

n; kZ+, xik

i=1X. (2.10)

Setαn+1=min{βn, 1/(n+ 1)}. By (QN-4), we have that{αn}n=1(0, 1] withαn+1αn

andαn1/nsuch that

k i=1

xi

αn

k i=1

xiα

n+1; kZ+, xik

i=1X. (2.11)

Observe that a subset of a precompact set is also precompact. SinceCis compact and TCC, there existpnZ+and{yin}ip=n1TCsuch that

TC

pn

i=1

yin+Nαn+1n+1

. (2.12)

Setgin(x)=max{0,αn+1− |Txyin|αn+1},xC,i=1, 2,...,pn. Since the quasi-norms are continuous onXandTis continuous onC, we have thatgin(x) is continuous onC. If xC, then by (2.12), there existsi0(1i0pn) such that|Txyi0n|αn+1< αn+1, that is, gi0n(x)>0. Setgn(x)=pn

i=1gin(x). Then for allxC,gn(x)>0. Define Tnx=

pn

i=1

gin(x)

gn(x)yin, xC. (2.13)

ThenTnis a continuous operator onC. Notice thatgin(x)=0 if and only if|Txyin|αn+1

< αn+1. For eachxC, by (2.11) and (QN-2) we have that TxTnxαn=

1 gn(x)

pn

i=1

gin(x)Txyin α

n

1 gn(x)

pn

i=1

gin(x)Txyinα

n+1< αn+1.

(2.14)

(5)

SetCn=co{yin}ip=n1,Yn=span{yin}ip=n1. SinceCis compact and convex, by (2.13) we have thatTnCCnandCnC. Thus,TnCnCn. SinceYnis a finite dimensional closed sub- space ofXand the bounded convex closed setCnYn, by the Brouwer fixed point theo- rem andLemma 2.8(i), there existsxnCnsuch thatTnxn=xn. Since{xn}n=1CandC is compact, without loss of generality, we can suppose that limn→∞xn=x0C. For each α(0, 1], by (QN-3u) and (QN-4), there existsβ(0,α/3] such that

x0Tx0αx0xnβ+TnxnTxnβ+TxnTx0β. (2.15)

SinceT is continuous and limn→∞αn=0, there exists aKZ+such thatαnβ,|x0 xn|β< βand|TxnTx0|β< βfor allnK. By (2.14) we have that

TnxnTxnβTnxnTxnα

n< αn+1αn< β. (2.16) Hence (2.15) implies|x0Tx0|α<α, that is,Tx0=x0. This completes the proof.

As a direct consequence ofTheorem 2.10, we can obtain the following byLemma 2.9.

Corollary 2.11. Let (X,Q) be a generating space of strong quasi-norm family,Ca compact convex subset ofXandTa continuous operator fromCintoC. Then there exists anx0C such thatTx0=x0.

Theorem 2.12. Let (X,Q) be a generating space of sub-strong quasi-norm family satisfying that each| · |αQis continuous onX. LetCbe a closed convex subset ofXandTa contin- uous operator fromCintoC. IfXis complete andTCcompact, then there exists anx0C such thatTx0=x0.

Proof. SetB=TC. We will prove that coBis compact. For eachα(0, 1], applying (QN- 3u) and (QN-4), there exists aβ(0,α/3) such that|w1+w2+w3|α≤ |w1|β+|w2|β+

|w3|βfor allw1,w2,w3X. Thus,

N(β,β) +N(β,β) +N(β,β)N(α,α). (2.17) Applying (QN-3u) again, there exists aγ(0,β] such that

n i=1

zi

β

n i=1

ziγ; nZ+, zin

i=1X. (2.18)

SinceTCis compact, we obtain thatBis precompact. Thus, there exist annγZ+and {x}ni=γ1Bsuch that

B

nγ

i=1

x+N(γ,γ). (2.19)

(6)

Suppose thatxcoB. Thenx=k

j=1ejyj, wherekZ+,yjBandej0 (j=1, 2,...,k), k

j=1ej=1. By (2.19), there existsxj∈{x}ni=γ1such thatyjxjN(γ,γ), (j=1, 2,...,k).

By (2.18), we have that x

k j=1

ejxj

β

k j=1

ejyjxjγ< γβ. (2.20)

SetCγ=co{x}ni=γ1,Yγ=span{x}ni=γ1. Sincekj=1ejxjCγ, from (2.20) we get that xCγ+N(β,β), that is, coBCγ+N(β,β). (2.21) SinceYγ is a finite dimensional space andCγ a bounded set ofYγ, we derive thatCγ is compact. Thus, there existkγZ+and{z}ki=γ1CγcoBsuch thatCγCγkγ

i=1z+ N(β,β). Hence, by (2.17) and (2.21) we have that

coBcoB+N(β,β)Cγ+N(β,β) +N(β,β)

kγ

i=1

z+N(β,β) +N(β,β) +N(β,β)

kγ

i=1

z+N(α,α), (2.22) showing coB is precompact. SinceX is complete, we obtain that coBis complete. Ap- plyingLemma 2.8(ii), coBis compact. SinceBCandCis a closed convex set, we de- rive that coBC. Clearly,T(coB)TC=BcoB. Therefore,T is a continuous oper- ator from the convex compact set coBinto itself. Applying Theorem 2.10, there exists x0coBCsuch thatTx0=x0. This completes the proof.

As a direct consequence ofTheorem 2.12, we can obtain the following byLemma 2.9.

Corollary 2.13. Let (X,Q) be a generating space of strong quasi-norm family. LetCbe a closed convex subset ofXandT a continuous operator fromCintoC. IfXis complete and TCcompact, then there exists anx0Csuch thatTx0=x0.

Theorem 2.14. Let (X,Q) be a generating space of strong quasi-norm family andCa closed convex subset ofX. LetT1 andT2 be continuous operators fromC intoC satisfying the following conditions:

(i)T1is contractive, that is, there exists a constantr[0, 1) such that

T1xT1yαr|xy|α α(0, 1],x,yC. (2.23)

(ii)T2Cis compact.

(iii) For anyx,yCit holds thatT1x+T2yC.

IfXis complete, then there exists anx0Csuch thatx0=(T1+T2)x0=T1x0+T2x0. Proof. Suppose thatzT2C. Define

Tz:Tzx=T1x+z, xC. (2.24)

(7)

Then TzxTzy=T1xT1y. Since C is closed, by (i) and (iii) we have that Tz is a contractive operator fromCintoC. Set yn+1=Tzyn, wherenZ+and y0C. Then {yn}n=0C. Since (QN-3t) and (QN-4) imply (QN-3u), for eachα(0, 1], by (i) and (QN-3u), there exists aβ(0,α] such that

yn+pynα=

p i=1

yn+iyn+i1

α

p i=1

yn+iyn+i1β

p i=1

rn+i1y1y0β rn

1ry1y0β,

(2.25)

showing that{yn}is a Cauchy sequence inC. SinceXis complete andCclosed, limn→∞yn

=yC. Observe thatTis continuous. Fromyn+1=Tzynwe derive thatTzy=y. By (i) we see thatyis a unique fixed point ofTz. DefineS:Sz=y. ThenSis an operator from T2CintoC. By (2.24) we have that

Sz=T1Sz+z. (2.26)

By (i) and (QN-3t), for eachα(0, 1] there isβ(0,α] such that Sz1Sz2α=T1Sz1T1Sz2

+z1z2α

T1Sz1T1Sz2α+z1z2βrSz1Sz2α+z1z2β (2.27) for allz1,z2T2C, that is,|Sz1Sz2|α(1/(1r))|z1z2|β, showing thatSis contin- uous. SinceST2is a continuous operator fromCintoC,S(T2C) is compact by (ii), and ST2CS(T2C), we derive thatST2Cis compact. Observe that (QN-3t) and (QN-4) imply (QN-3u), and byLemma 2.9, (QN-3t) implies the quasi-norms are continuous. Apply- ingTheorem 2.12, there exists anx0Csuch that ST2x0=x0. Settingz0=T2x0, then Sz0=x0, and by (2.26),Sz0=T1Sz0+z0. Therefore,x0=T1x0+T2x0. This completes the

proof.

Remark 2.15. From Lemmas3.5 and2.9we see that, if (X,Q) is a generating space of semi-norm family, then it is a locally convex Hausdorfflinear topological space and its semi-norms are continuous. Noticing that (QN-3e) implies (QN-3u) and (QN-3t), The- orems2.10,2.12(Corollaries2.11,2.13) andTheorem 2.14are in some sense the gen- eralizations of fixed point theorems (in locally convex space) of Schauder-Tychonoff, Schauder-Hukanare and Schauder-Krasnoselskii, respectively.

3. Applications: fixed point theorems in probabilistic case and fuzzy case

Throughout this section, We denote byL,R,Δthe mappings from [0, 1]×[0, 1] into [0, 1] which are symmetric and nondecreasing for both arguments and satisfyL(0, 0)=0, R(1, 1)=1,Δ(a, 1)=aandΔ(a,Δ(b,c))=Δ(Δ(a,b),c), respectively. we denote byᏲthe set of all fuzzy real numbers (see [9]). IfηᏲandη(t)=0 fort <0, thenηis called a non-negative fuzzy real number and byᏲ+we mean the set of all them. Forη+ andα(0, 1],α-level set [η]α= {t:η(t)α}is a closed interval and we write by [η]α

=α+α]. We also denote byᏰthe set of all left-continuous distribution functions (see

(8)

[7,10]); by 0 the fuzzy number which satisfies 0(t)=1 fort=0 and 0(t)=0 fort=0; by Hthe distribution functions which satisfiesH(t)=1 fort >0 andH(t)=0 fort0.

Now we recall some basic concepts and facts about fuzzy normed space (briefly, FNS) and probabilistic normed space (briefly, PNS).

Definition 3.1 (see [2,9]). LetXbe a real linear space and · a mapping fromXinto Ᏺ+. Denote [x]α=[xα,x+α] forxXandα(0, 1]. The quadruple (X, · ,L,R) is called an FNS and · a fuzzy norm if the following conditions are satisfied:

(FN-1)x =0 if and only ifx=θ;

(FN-2)ex = |e| xfor allxXande(−∞, +);

(FN-3) for allx,yX,

(i)x+y(s+t)L(x(s),y(t)) whenever sx1, ty1 ands+ tx+y1;

(ii)x+y(s+t)R(x(s),y(t)) whenever sx1, ty1 ands+ tx+y1.

Remark 3.2. By [9, Theorems 3.1–3.4] we know that the topology of (X, · ,L,R) is de- cided by{x+α:α(0, 1]}or{N+(ε,α) :ε >0,α(0, 1]}, whereN+(ε,α)={x:x+α}. Lemma 3.3 (see [9]). Let (X, · ,L,R) be an FNS. Suppose that

(R-1)Rmax;

(R-2) for eachα(0, 1] there exists aβ(0,α] such thatR(β,γ)< αforγ(0,α);

(R-3) lima0+R(a,a)=0.

Then (X,{x+α:α(0, 1]}) is

(i) a generating space of quasi-norm family if (X, · ,L,R) satisfies (R-3);

(ii) a generating space of strong quasi-norm family if (X, · ,L,R) satisfies (R-2);

(iii) a generating space of semi-norm family if (X, · ,L,R) satisfies (R-1).

Definition 3.4 (see [6,7,10]). LetXbe a real linear space andFa mapping fromXinto Ᏸ. DenoteF(x)(t)= fx(t) forxX andt(−∞, +). The triple (X,F,Δ) is called a Menger PNS if the following conditions are satisfied:

(PN-1) fx(0)=0; fx(t)=H(t) if and only ifx=θ;

(PN-2) fex(t)= fx(t/|e|) for allxXand 0=e(−∞, +);

(PN-3) fx+y(s+t)Δ(fx(s),fy(t)) for allx,yXands,t0.

Lemma 3.5 (see [8,10]). Let (X,F,Δ) be a Menger PNS. For anyε >0 andα(0, 1] we defineN(ε,α)= {x:fx(ε)>1α}andxα=inf{t0 : fx(t)>1α}. Then

(i)N(ε,α)= {x:xα< ε};

(ii) fx(t)fy(t) for allt0 if and only ifxαyαfor allα(0, 1].

Lemma 3.6 (see [8,11]). Let (X,F,Δ) be a Menger PNS. Suppose that (Δ-1)Δ=min;

-2) for eachα(0, 1) there exists aβ[α, 1) such thatΔ(β,γ)> αforγ(α, 1);

(Δ-3) supa<1Δ(a,a)=1.

Then (X,{xα:α(0, 1]}) is

(i) a generating space of quasi-norm family if (X,F,Δ) satisfies (Δ-3);

(ii) a generating space of strong quasi-norm family if (X,F,Δ) satisfies (Δ-2);

(iii) a generating space of semi-norm family if (X,F,Δ) satisfies (Δ-1).

(9)

Remark 3.7. From Lemmas3.5and3.3(i) we see that if (X,F,Δ) satisfies (Δ-3), then the (ε,α)-topology on (X,F,Δ) induced by{N(ε,α) :ε >0, α(0, 1]}coincides with the topology on (X,{xα:α(0, 1]}).

Next we make use of Theorems2.10,2.12,2.14and Lemmas3.3,3.5,3.6to give some Schauder-type fixed point theorems in FNS and Menger PNS. The proofs are omitted here for the sake of brevity.

Theorem 3.8. Let (X, · ,L,R) be an FNS with (R-2),Ca compact convex subset ofX andTa continuous operator fromCintoC. Then there exists anx0Csuch thatTx0=x0. Theorem 3.9. Let (X, · ,L,R) be an FNS with (R-2),Ca closed convex subset ofXand Ta continuous operator fromCintoC. IfXis complete andTCcompact, then there exists anx0Csuch thatTx0=x0.

Theorem 3.10. Let (X, · ,L,R) be an FNS with (R-2), andCa closed convex subset ofX.

LetT1andT2be continuous operators fromCintoCsatisfying the following conditions:

(i)T1is contractive, that is, there exists a constantr[0, 1) such that

T1xT1y+αrxy+α α(0, 1],x,yX. (3.1)

(ii)T2Cis compact.

(iii) For anyx,yCit holds thatT1x+T2yC.

IfXis complete, then there exists anx0Csuch thatx0=(T1+T2)x0=T1x0+T2x0. Theorem 3.11. Let (X,F,Δ) be a Menger PNS with (Δ-2),Ca compact convex subset ofX andTa continuous operator fromCintoC. Then there exists anx0Csuch thatTx0=x0. Theorem 3.12. Let (X,F,Δ) be a Menger PNS with (Δ-2),Ca closed convex subset ofX andTa continuous operator fromCintoC. IfXis complete andTCis compact, then there exists anx0Csuch thatTx0=x0.

Theorem 3.13. Let (X,F,Δ) be a Menger PNS with (Δ-2), andCa closed convex subset of X. LetT1andT2be continuous operators fromCintoCsatisfying the following conditions:

(i)T1 is contractive, that is, there exists a constant r(0, 1) such that centerline fT1xT1y(t) fxy(t/r) for allt0;

(ii)T2Cis compact;

(iii) for anyx,yC, it holds thatT1x+T2yC.

IfXis complete, then there exists anx0Csuch thatx0=(T1+T2)x0=T1x0+T2x0. Remark 3.14. SinceΔ(a,a)afor alla[0, 1] is equivalent toΔ=min, andTis non- expansive impliesT is continuous, Theorem 3.12presents an improved version of [11, Theorem 3.2], moreover, Theorems3.11and3.13present a complementary version of [6, Theorems 2 and 4].

Acknowledgment

This project is supported by the Science Foundation of Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology.

(10)

References

[1] K. Fan, A generalization of Tychonoff’s fixed point theorem, Mathematische Annalen 142 (1961), 305–310.

[2] J.-X. Fang and G.-A. Song,Φ-contractor and the solutions for nonlinear operator equations in fuzzy normed spaces, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 121 (2001), no. 2, 267–273.

[3] V. I. Istr˘at¸escu, Fixed Point Theory. An Introduction, Mathematics and Its Applications, vol. 7, D.

Reidel, Dordrecht, 1981.

[4] J. L. Kelley and I. Namioka, Linear Topological Spaces, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, no. 36, Springer, New York, 1976.

[5] I. Krasnoselskii, et al., Approximation Solution of Operator Equations, Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen, 1978.

[6] X. Lin, Fixed-point theorems in probabilistic normed linear spaces, Journal of Mathematics (Wuhan) 3 (1983), no. 1, 73–82 (Chinese).

[7] A. N. Serstnev, On the notion of a random normed space, Doklady Akademii Nauk USSR 149 (1963), no. 2, 280–283, Soviet Mathematics 4 (1963), no. 2, 388–391.

[8] J. Z. Xiao and X. H. Zhu, Probabilistic norm of operators and resonance theorems, Applied Math- ematics and Mechanics 20 (1999), no. 7, 781–788.

[9] , On linearly topological structure and property of fuzzy normed linear space, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 125 (2002), no. 2, 153–161.

[10] S. S. Zhang, Basic theory and applications of probabilistic metric spaces. I, Applied Mathematics and Mechanics 9 (1988), no. 2, 123–133.

[11] S. S. Zhang and J. L. Guo, Probability integrals, Gateaux differentials and the Schauder principle in probabilistic normed linear spaces, Journal of Sichuan University. Natural Science Edition 26 (1989), no. 2, 127–135 (Chinese).

Jian-Zhong Xiao: Department of Mathematics, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

E-mail address:[email protected]

Xing-Hua Zhu: Department of Mathematics, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China

E-mail address:[email protected]

参照

関連したドキュメント

Jungck, “Common fixed point results for noncommuting mappings without continuity in cone metric spaces,” Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications, vol.. Zhang, “Cone

Aydi, “Fixed point theorems for generalized weakly contractive condition in ordered partial metric spaces,” Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Optimization, vol.. Aydi, “Common

Rhoades, Assad-Kirk-type fixed point theorems for a pair of nonself mappings on cone metric spaces, Fixed Point Theory Appl., 2009, (2009) 16 pages.. Radenovi´ c, Common fixed

We prove the existence of the unique common fixed point theorems for self mappings which are weakly compatible satisfying some contractive conditions on partial metric

In 1970, Takahashi [15] introduced the definition of convexity in metric space and generalized same important fixed point theorems previously proved for Banach spaces... this paper

We introduce the notion of modular G–metric spaces and obtain some fixed point theorems of contractive mappings defined on modular G–metric spaces.. Introduction

´ Ciri´c, “Coupled fixed point theorems for nonlinear contractions in partially ordered metric spaces,” Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods &amp;

Motivated and inspired by results of papers [5, 6, 14], we established some new common fixed point theorems for weakly compatible mappings in fuzzy metric spaces by using the