2019 年 9 月 地熱月報 ジャカルタ事務所 (インドネシア) – 3 件 1. 政府、探鉱プログラムで地熱開発を支援 2019 年 9 月 18 日 (中央:財務省国家資産総局イサ・ラクマタルワタ(Isa Rachmatarwata)総局長) インドネシア財務省は、政府の探鉱プログラムを通して地熱開発エリアの探鉱を支援し、地熱 エネルギー産業への投資を促進する計画があると 18 日ジャカルタで開催されたメディアディス カッションで発表した。 イサ・ラクマタルワタ国家資産総局長は、コストがかかる上リスクの高い掘削が民間企業や投 資家を消極的にさせ、地熱開発の足かせになっているとし、政府が率先してリスクを負い、開発 を支援する探鉱プログラムを策定したと述べた。このプログラムには、インフラ金融公社
PT.Sarana Multi Infrastructure、国営電力 PLN 傘下 PT. Geo Dipa Energi、政府系インフラ保 証基金 PT. Penjaminan Infrastruktur Indonesia(PII)の 3 つの財務省特別ミッション会社(SPV: Special Mission Vehicle)が関わり、計画や予算編成と運用、調達から実際の掘削までを担う。 エネルギー源が発見され、採算が取れる見込みがある場合は、開発に興味がある投資家らに 提供可能と付け加えた。
PT. Geo Dipa Energy のリキ・フィルマンダ・イブラヒム(Riki Firmandha Ibrahim)マネージング ディレクターは同会場で、インドネシアの地熱探鉱プログラムをサポートする用意があることを表 明した。2020 年度の国家予算から 7,000 億ルピア(約 53 億 3,400 万円)の国家資本参加(PMN) を受ける計画がある。その計画に従い、ジオディパは現在、エネルギー鉱物資源省によって提 案された地熱エネルギー源を含むとされる 4 つの新しい井戸を調査している。地熱井は下記。
④東ヌサ・トゥンガラ州ナゲ(Nusa Tenggara Timur, Nage)
(出典:9 月 18 日付アンタラ通信)
2. マルク州ブル県ワプサリット地域(Wapsalit, Kabupaten Buru, Provinsi Maluku)での予備調査 および探鉱エリア(WPSPE)の入札 2019 年 9 月 26 日 番号:001 / WPSPE-DEP / 2019 エネルギー鉱物資源省は、マルク州ブル県のワプサリット地域での地熱予備調査および探鉱 (WPSPE)地域指定入札を実施する。入札情報は下記の通り。 1. 予備調査および探鉱エリア(WPSPE)名:ワプサリット(Wapsalit) 2. WPSPE 場所:マルク州ブル県 3. WPSPE エリア:6,038 ha 4. ポテンシャル:26 MWe 5. 提出期限:2019 年 9 月 26 日~2019 年 10 月 25 日 時間:午前 8 時 16:00 WIB
会場:Sekretariat Panitia Pemilihan PSPE Panas Bumi Gedung Ditjen EBTKE lt.3
Jl. Pegangsaan Timur No. 1, Menteng Jakarta Pusat (出典:9 月 26 日付新再生可能エネルギー・省エネルギー総局(EBTKE)ホームページ) 3. 世界銀行、地熱探鉱事業に 1 億 5,000 万米ドル(約 161 億 6,800 万円)の融資を承認 2019 年 9 月 28 日 アンタラ通信 (世界銀行インドネシア・東ティモール代表ロドリゴ A シャベス(Rodrigo A Chaves)氏) インドネシアで地熱発電事業を拡大する主な障害の 1 つである探査掘削へのリスク軽減のた め、世界銀行の理事会は地熱探鉱事業に 1 億 5,000 万米ドル(約 161 億 6,800 万円)の融資 を承認した。 世界銀行インドネシア・東ティモール代表のロドリゴ・A・チャベス氏は、地熱発電事業を拡大 する主な障害の 1 つである探査・掘削資金を克服することにより、この国の巨大な地熱ポテンシ ャルを十分に活用できると述べた。この融資は、「地熱資源リスク軽減(GREM:Geothermal
Resource Risk Mitigation )プロジェクト」の一環。探鉱事業への融資を行うことで、再生可能エ ネルギーの開発促進を図る。また、世界銀行は、インドネシアの経済成長、雇用創出、繁栄の 基盤として電力への普遍的なアクセスを達成できるよう支援することにコミットしていると付け加 えた。 インドネシア・エネルギー鉱物資源省スティヤストト(FX Sutijastoto)EBTKE 総局長は、地熱 発電プロジェクトは、特に探査・掘削段階で高いリスクのある投資であり、この初期段階で資金 を提供し、リスクを共有する GREM プロジェクトを歓迎すると述べた。クリーンで再生可能なエネ ルギー源であり、継続的に電力を供給することができる地熱発電は、インドネシアの石炭や他 の化石燃料への依存を軽減することが可能。また、2025 年までの政府目標である再生可能エ ネルギーの割合を 23%に引き上げる電源構成比率を達成するには、約 7%または 7,000 MW に相当する地熱開発からの貢献が必要であり、それには 350 億米ドル規模の投資が必要とな る。 インドネシアは原油の純輸入国であり、全国の総電力容量のうち、88%が化石燃料に由来し、 12%が再生可能エネルギーに由来している。地熱発電は既に 1.9GW 発電されており、政府の 再生可能エネルギー目標を達成するために、さらに 4.6GW の発電開発を計画している。 (出典:9 月 28 日付アンタラ通信)
KEMENTERIAN ENERGI DAN SUMBER DAYA MINERAL
DIREKTORAT JENDERAL ENERGI BARU TERBARUKAN DAN KONSERVASI ENERGI
GEOTHERMAL AS A CLEAN AND RENEWABLE ENERGY
SOURCE IN THE ENERGY MIX
L
ERG
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
G
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Vice Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources
The 7
thIndonesia Internasional Geothermal Convention & Exhibition
Jakarta, 13
thAugust 2019
2
CURRENT CONDITION
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
NRE MWIDR
IDR IDRFosil EBT % NRE Potential
=
% NRE Efficent InefficientRenewable energy capacity
shall be increased
The Indonesia’s
commitment on climate
change (Paris Agreement)
Inefficient energy
consumption in
demand side
Abundant resources of
renewable energy but
low utilization
Energy supply is still
dominated by fossil energy
Energy price is needed to
be affordable for low
income people and to be
economic viable for
mid-high income people
Energy access should be
distributed to elevate
electrification ratio so it can
reach to the people in good
GEOTHERMAL ENERGY CONTRIBUTION TO THE
TOTAL POWER PLANT IN INDONESIA 2018
9%
3%
1%
6%
26%
55%
Installed capacity of power plant by fuel
Other NRE (390.1 MW)
Diesel PP (4,022 MW)
Gas PP (16,458 MW)
Coal PP (34,431 MW)
Hydro PP (5,733 MW)
Geothermal PP (1,948.5 MW)
Fossil
Fuel
Green
Power
87.2%
12.8%
Resources
Geothermal Working Areas (GWA)
Regulation
64 GWA & 13 PSPE
Areas
• 19 Existing GWA
• 45 New GWA
• 13 PSPE Areas
25,386.5 MW
Geological Agency, Dec 2018
•
Law 21/2014
Æ Geothermal
•
GR 7/2017
Æ Geothermal for Indirect-uses
•
MEMR No. 21/2017
Æ Mud Wastes & Drilling
Cutting Management
•
MEMR No.23/2017
Æ Production Bonus
•
MEMR No. 36/2017
Æ PSP & PSPE
•
MEMR No. 37/2017
Æ GWA
•
MEMR No.33/2018
Æ Data & Information
•
MEMR No.37 /2018
Æ Geothermal Licensing
Installed Capacity
1,948.5 MW
• 13 GPP from 11 GWA
• 6,8% from total resources
Electricity Production
14.011 GWh
(2018)
• 106,24% from 2018 target
(13.188 GWh)
Non-tax State Revenue
Investment
USD 1.214 Billion
(2018)
• 100% from 2018 target
(USD 1,214 M)
Rp 2.28 Trillion
(2018)
• 325.7 % from 2018 Target Rp
700 Billion
Steam Production
103.71 Million Tons
(2018)
• 103.71% from 2018 target (97.84 million
Tons)
6
The GOI also committed to participate on
global sustainable action as pledged by
President Joko Widodo, at the 21st COP
2015 in Paris, known as Paris Agreement that
is committed :
9 To reduce greenhouse gas emission in
2030 to 29% on its own efforts.
9 With International support, the reduction of
greenhouse gas emission is targeted up
to 41%.
National Commitment in Global
Climate Change
President of The Republic of Indonesia:
“Emition mitigation in energy sector conducted
in several ways:
9 Switch fuel subsidy into productive sector;
9 Enhancement of renewable energy use
about 23% of total national energy
consumption by 2025;
9 Generating Power from Waste
(Waste-to-energy consept).
RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY
IN ENERGY MIX 2025
38%
35%
33-34%
28-32%
3%
3%
3%
2-5%
13%*) 13%*)
13%*) 13%*)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
BPPT Outlook
B-30 = NRE
B30 + Green Biofuel
2025
B30 + Green Biofuel+
Bioenergy PP
Gas
Coal
Oil
Biodiesel
Greenfuel
Bioenergy PP
NRE
*) Note: International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) Projection of Renewable Penetration in
Energy Mix 2025 = 15%
Impor (75%) Produksi DN(25%)Electricity
Non
Electricity
23%
Geothermal 3%
8
67.2
73.0
76.6
80.5
84.3
88.3
91.2
95.3
97.5
99,9
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
East Nusa Tenggara61.90%
The Achievement for national electrification ratio until Q4 2018
has reach 98.3%
*, with the composition as follows:
PLN 95.45%; Non-PLN 2.48%; and LTSHE 0.37%.
Electrification Ratio 2010 - 2019 [%]
Achievement Target Realization Q3*) unaudited SUMATRA 1 Aceh 99.18 2 North Sumatra 99.99 3 West Sumatra 91.83 4 Riau 99.00 5 Riau Islands 88.10 6 Jambi 97.39 7 Bengkulu 99.77 8 South Sumatra 91.38 9 Lampung 95.78 10 Babel 99.99 JAVA-BALI-NUSRA 11 Banten 99.99 12 Jakarta 99.99 13 West Java 99.99 14 Central Java 98.38 15 Yogyakarta 99.99 16 East Java 93.87 17 Bali 99.99 18 West Nusa Tenggara 89,10
19 East Nusa Tenggara 61.90
KALIMANTAN 20 West Kalimantan 87.28 21 Central Kalimantan 84.56 22 South Kalimantan 95.96 23 East Kalimantan 99.99 24 North Kalimantan 90.28 SULAWESI 25 South Sulawesi 99.99 26 Southeast Sulawesi 86.68 27 West Sulawesi 99.73 28 Central Sulawesi 91.54 29 Gorontalo 87.76 30 North Sulawesi 97.11
MALUKU & PAPUA 31 Maluku 89.18 32 North Maluku 99.45 33 West Papua 99.99 34 Papua 81.66 98.3 5 > 70 50 - 70 < 50 Note:
ELECTRIFICATION RATIO 2018
Badan Geologi Kementerian ESDM, 2018
GEOTHERMAL POTENCY IN INDONESIA
No Island
Num. of
Location
Potential Energy (MW)
Total
Installed
Capacity
(MW)
Speculative Hypothetic
Reserves
Possible
Probable
Proven
1
Sumatera 103
2.776
1.689
3.889
1.083 1.028 10.465
562
2
Jawa 73
1.190
1.460
3.708
516 1.820 8.694 1.254
3
Bali 6
70 22
122
110 30 354 0
4
Nusa Tenggara
28
225 210 829 121 12.5
1.397,5 12,5
5
Kalimantan 14
151 18 12 0 0 181 0
6
Sulawesi
89
1.360
362
1.041
180 120 3.063 120
7
Maluku 33
560
91
497
6 2 1.156 0
8
Papua 3
75
0 0 0 0 75 0
Total 349
6.407
3.852
10.099
2.016 3.012,5 25.386,5 1.948,5
10.259 15.127,5
25.386,5
00 1.000 2.000 3.000 4.000 5.000 6.000 7.000 8.000 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 Tamb ahan Kapasi tas (MW) Targ eted Capaci ty (MW)
TARGET K APASITAS
TARG
E
T
K
APA
Indonesia is the
2nd largest
geothermal
producer after
surpassed
Phillipines in
2018
* Assumption: if the capacity of Philippines (1,870 MW) and US (3,450 MW) are not increased
TARGET K APASITAS
Installed Capacity per 2018 : 1,948.5 MW
Plan of additional installed capacity in
2019 is 185 MW including:
1. Lumut Balai PP Unit 1 (55 MW)
2. Sorik Marapi Modullar PP Unit 1 (45 MW) 3. Muaralaboh PP Unit 1 (80 MW) 4. Sokoria PP Unit 1 (5 MW) Indonesia will be the 1st largest geothermal producer after surpassed US in 2024*
Based on COD
a. Short Term 2019-2024
: 48 Projects
Æ
1.522,5 MW
b. Medium Term 2025-2028
: 126 Projects
Æ
5.131 MW
c. Long Term 2029-2030
: 46 Project s
Æ
1.400 MW
Geothermal Development
2019 – 2030:
10.002 MW
Installed Capacity : 1.948,5
MW
+
220 PROJECTS Plan of Dev
Until 2030
8.053,5 MW
Based on Development Progress
a. Existing (on going, PPA)
: 61 Projects on 29 GWA
Æ
2.547 MW
b. Pipeline (in RUPTL, non PPA) : 52 Projects on 34 GWA/WPSPE
Æ
2.015 MW
c. Resources (non RUPTL):
107 Projects
Æ
3.491 MW
- 60 projects on 32 GWA
Æ
1.931 MW
- 23 projects on 13 WPSPE
Æ
875 MW
- 24 projects on 22 Open Area
Æ
685 MW
Based on resources
a. High Temp > 225˚C
: 168 Projects
Æ
6.896,5 MW
b. Medium Temp 125˚C - 225˚C : 52 Projects
Æ
1.157 MW
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
m
a
a
a
a
al
a
l
l
l
D
De
D
D
D
D
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
ev
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
e
ve
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
v
e
el
e
e
e
e
l
l
l
l
llo
o
op
o
o
o
o
o
o
p
p
p
p
p
p
p
m
12
No.
Geothermal PP
Developer
Capacity(MW)
Year
Remaks
1
Sokoria #1
PT Sokoria Geothermal Indonesia
5
2019
Exploitation
2
Sokoria #2
PT Sokoria Geothermal Indonesia
5
2020
3
Sokoria #3
PT Sokoria Geothermal Indonesia
5
2020
4
Jaboi #1
PT Sabang Geothermal Energy
5.5
2021
Exploration
5
Dieng Small Scale
PT Geo Dipa Energi (Persero)
10
2021
Exploitation
6
Tulehu #1
PT PLN (Persero)
2
2021
Exploitation
7
Tulehu #2
PT PLN (Persero)
5
2022
8
Sokoria #4
PT Sokoria Geothermal Indonesia
5
2022
Exploitation
9
Jaboi #2
PT Sabang Geothermal Energy
5
2023
Exploration
10
Sokoria #5
PT Sokoria Geothermal Indonesia
5
2023
Exploitation
11
Ulubelu Small Scale
PT PGE
20
2023
Exploitation
12
Lahendong Small Scale #1
PT PGE
5
2023
Exploitation
13
Lumut Balai Small Scale
PT PGE
5
2024
Exploitation
14
Lahendong Small Scale #2
PT PGE
5
2024
Exploitation
15
Hululais
small scale #1 PT
PGE
10
2025
Exploitation
No
Geothermal PP
Dev
veloper
Capa
acity(
MW)
Year
R
Rem
a
ks
No.
Geothermal PP
Developer
Capacity(MW)
Year
Remaks
16
Kamojang
Small-scale#1 PT
PGE
10
2025
Exploitation
17
Kamojang
Small-scale#2 PT
PGE
10
2025
Exploitation
18
Sungai Penuh
small scale PT
PGE
5
2025
Exploitation
19
Lahendong Small Scale #3
PT PGE
5
2025
Exploitation
20
Atadei #1
PT PLN (Persero)
5
2025
Exploration
21
Sokoria #6
PT Sokoria Geothermal Indonesia
5
2025
Exploitation
22
Gn. Sirung
PT PLN (Persero)
5
2025
Exploration
23
Wapsalit -
6
2025
Exploration
24
Atadei #2
PT PLN (Persero)
5
2027
Exploration
TOTAL
153,5
No
Geothermal PP
Dev
velope
er
Capacity(MW)
Ye
ear
Re
em
maks
14
No.
PLTP
Pengembang
Kapasitas (MW)
Tahun
1
Dieng Binary #1
PT Geo Dipa Energi (Persero)
10
2021
2
Salak Binary
Star Energy Geothermal Salak (SEGS), Ltd
15 2022
3
Dieng Binary #3
PT Geo Dipa Energi (Persero)
10
2030
4
Dieng Binary #2
PT Geo Dipa Energi (Persero)
10
2025
5
Lahendong Binary #2
PT PGE
10
2025
6
Lahendong Binary #3
PT PGE
10
2025
7
Lahendong Binary
PT PGE
10
2025
TOTAL
75
Assignment to Stated-Owned Companies
BASED ON GOVERNMENT REGULATION 7/2017
GWA’s Tender: • Open Tender (Surveyed by Government) • Limited Tender (Surveyed by Private) 30 Years GWA Enactment GL Issued (IPB) PPA Production Assignment to PT.PLN to purchase EBL Issued (IUPTL) PS or PS + E by Government PSA or PSA+E by Private Not to be developed, Not economically viable
GL = Geothermal License EBL = Electrical Business License PPA = Power Purchasing Agreement
FS = Feasibility Study PS= Preliminary Survey
PSA = Preliminary Survey Assignment
Exploration: 5+1+1 Years
FS
PSA + E = Preliminary Survey Assignment + Exploration PS + E = Preliminary Survey + Exploration
GWA = Geothermal Working Area
S
O
GO
G
O
O
/20
GEOTHERMAL BUSINESS SCHEME
Assignment to Public Service Agencies
16
BENEFITS OF GEOTHERMAL DEVELOPMENT
Geothermal
Energy
Benefits
Sustainable energy
Ladarello 1911
New Zealand 1958
Indonesia 1983
Low-carbon
emission
- 1/7 from Gas PP
- 1/15 from Coal
PP
Renewable Energy
- No fuel required
Resistance to
inflation
Stable tariff fixed
price
Postive impact to
national economy
- Local
infrastructure
- Increase of
Non-Tax State Revenue
Reliable / High
Availability Factor
Geo PP 90-95 %
Coal PP 60-80 %
Hydro PP 50 %
Solar PP 20 %
Wind PP 40 %
CHALLENGES IN GEOTHERMAL
DEVELOPMENT
Geothermal Location Within Forestry Area
Cost Efficiency
Funding
Social Matters Issue
18
1. Optimizing existing geothermal fields using binary and well head power plants as
RUPTL;
2. Creating Market Demand
- Flores Geothermal Island
- Synergizing State-owned Enterprises in geothermal developments
- Developing industrial areas based on renewable energy resources (Halmahera
Cluster and Bacan Cluster)
3. Easy access for competitive funding;
4. Simplification of Permits and Regulation;
- Easy Licensing;
- Implementation of online licensing;
- Improving quality of data and information;
- Implementation of monitoring and evaluation and problem solving facilitation
for geothermal projects;
- Improving Human Resources;
5. Synergizing inter governmental bodies and stakeholders
18 Locations
4. Mapos: 50 MWe
5. Rana Masak: 20 MWe
6. Rana Kulan: 7.5 MWe
7. Ulagalung: 5 MWe
1. Ulumbu: 86 MWe
2. Wai Pesi: 54 MW
3. Wae Sano: 151 MWe (The
first project of Government Drilling)8. Gou-inelika: 37 MWe
9. Mataloko: 52.5 MWe
(Location of direct use program)10. Mangeruda: 5 MWe
(Location for micro-binary program)11. Komandaru: 11 MWe
12. Ndetusoko: 10 MWe
13. Sokoria: 80 MWe
14. Jopu: 5 MWe
15. Lesugolo: 45 MWe
16. Oka Ile Ange: 50 MWe
17. Oyang Barang: 37 MWe
Flores as Geothermal Island was determined by
the Minister of MEMR Regulation No. 2268 K/30/MEM/2017
Resource : 735.5 MW
Reserves : 527 MW
Nage : 30 MWe
(New prospect for the next Government Drilling)20
1. Derisking Facility for exploration risk through adding data and information to
the GWA with geothermal drilling
2. To fund the Government Drilling program, the Government received a grant
from the Clean Technology Fund (CTF) of USD 49 million, and in accordance
with the agreement the proportion of financing between PT SMI (Persero) and
CTF was 50% -50%, so PT SMI allocated PISP funds amounting to USD 49
million to be used as matching funds
Facility for financing Exploration and Exploitation activities
and geothermal projects development by SOEs for indirect
geothermal (electricity) use using Geothermal Sector
Infrastructure Financing (PISP) funds
1
2
Government Drilling
Programme Fund
3
1. GREM is a soft financing scheme from the World Bank (WB) as well as a
loan (converted grant) from the Climate Fund (GCF / CTF) which is lent to
developers through PT SMI which acts as an Implementing Agency
2. The interest offered from the World Bank is around <5%
(Commercial Interest <7%, USD)
Geothermal Infrastructure
Development Fund (PISP
)
Geothermal Resource
Risk Mitigation Project
(GREM)
1 Derisking Facility for exploration risk through adding data and inform
ma
ation
ation
ation
GEOTHERMAL
DEVELOPMENT FUNDING BREAKTHROUGH
GEOTHERMAL
INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT FUND (PISP)
Legal basis:
In 2017 PMK Number 62 / PMK.08 / 2017 was issued concerning the
Management of Geothermal Sector Infrastructure Financing Funds in the
Company (Persero) of PT Sarana Multi Infrastruktur (PT SMI)
PISP purposes:
- Funding of Exploration and Exploitation activities as well as geothermal
project development by SOEs or PKUK holders for indirect geothermal use
(becoming electricity); and
- Provision / addition of Geothermal Data and Information for Geothermal
Working Areas preparation, which are carried out by PT SMI based on a
special assignment from the Minister of Finance proposed by the Minister of
Energy and Mineral Resources or the Managing Director of BUMN / a BUMN
subsidiary in Geothermal or Government Drilling.
22
PISP FOR FUNDING
CANDRADIMUKA PROJECT DEVELOPMENT
1) PT SMI is exploring the use of PISP funds to fund exploration activities
by SOEs, namely PT Geo Dipa and PT PLN (Persero)
2) The Chandradimuka Prospect Area is one of the prospects within the
Dieng Plateau GWA managed by PT GDE (Persero)
3) The investment costs for developing Chandradimuka's geothermal
prospect are estimated at around USD 4.7 million per MW, with funding
sources for the exploration phase using the Geothermal Sector
Infrastructure Financing (PISP) fund managed by PT SMI, and for the
exploitation phase using funds from the Japan International Cooperation
Agency (JICA).
4) In order to propose the use of PISP funds by PT GDE (Persero) to PT
SMI, certainty is needed from PT PLN (Persero) for the purchase of
electricity that will be generated from the Candradimuka Area.
SOE
DRILLING
SCHEME
24
GREM
PROGRAM - WORLD BANK
Advantages:
1. Developers can get loans from GREM from the start
of the project.
2. Lower interest rates.
3. If a failure occurs, the mechanism is partly replaced.
Weakness:
1. This mechanism has never been applied in
other countries.
2. Funds cannot be rolled
3. Detailed discussions are still needed between
WB and SMI
Overview of GREM program:
1. The biggest risk in geothermal development is at the stage of exploration activities so commercial banks
are reluctant to provide funding for exploration activities and usually funding is given after exploration
activities are completed. Biggest risk on geothermal development at the exploration phase
2. To minimize this risk, this GREM program breakthrough was designed.
3. GREM is a soft loan scheme from world banks that can be accessed by private or state-owned investors.
4. The GREM facility has the following benefits:
a. Being a derisking facility that is not available in the market because there are no financial institutions
that provide funding facilities for exploration
b. If developers use GREM loan funds, they will be more competitive than they use equity for
exploration financing
c.
There is a loan forgiveness facility of up to 50% which can ease the burden of the developer to return
the facility if the exploration fails
On Operation 1.948,5 MW
Expantion Plan 1.005 MW
Sibayak (12 MW) / - Ulubelu (220 MW) / (40 MW) Cibeureum-Parabakti (377 MW) / (70 MW) Pangalengan (282 MW) / (170 MW) Kamojang-Darajat (505 MW) / (55 MW) Dieng (60 MW) / (265 MW) Lahendong-Tompaso (120 MW) / (65 MW) Ulumbu (10 MW) / (40 MW) Mataloko (2,5 MW) / (20 MW) Sibual-Buali (330 MW) / (260 MW) Karaha Cakarabuana (30 MW) / (20 MW)11
WKP
Development Plan
(Exploitation 1.257 MW
Sungai Penuh (110 MW) Lumut Balai (220 MW) Hululais (165 MW) Cibuni (10 MW) Tabanan (65 MW) Tulehu (7 MW) Muaralaboh (220 MW) Rantau Dedap (220 MW) Sorik Marapi (240 MW)9
WKP
C T TDevelopment Plan (Exploration) 1.645 MW
Arjuno Welirang (185 MW)Atadei (10 MW) Baturaden (220 MW) Blawan Ijen (110 MW) Candi Umbul Telomoyo (55 MW) Danau Ranau (40 MW) Gn. Lawu (110 MW) Gn. Rajabasa (220 MW)
Gn. Sirung (5 MW) Gn. Talang- Bukit Kili (20 MW) Gn. Tangkuban Perahu (60 MW)
Gn. Ungaran (55 MW)