インド哲学仏教学研究 26(201803) 001丸井浩教授 略歴・業績一覧
7
0
0
全文
(2) 1990. 11. 4. 9. 1991. 7. 20. 33. 2013. 10. 10. 2017. 11. 27. 1990. 23 ICCR Distinguished Indologist Award 2017. I. 1.. [. Index to the Saddharmapuṇḍarīkasūtra: Sanskrit, Tibetan, Chinese, fascicles I-. XI, Tokyo: the Reiyukai, 1985.4–1993.10, xxiv +1193pp. 2.. [. I. (. 2. 1991. 2. 10. 252pp.. pp. 94–119 1998. 3. ). 3.. [. ]. xiv+1929pp.. 4.. [. ] The Way to Liberation: Indological Studies in Japan, Vol. I, Japanese Studies. on South Asia, No. 3, Delhi: Manohar, 2000, 289pp. Edited by Sengaku Mayeda, in collaboration with Y. Matsunami, M. Tokunaga and H. Marui. 5.. [. 2001 10. 6.. [. 7.. [. 2. ―. v +561 pp. 22. [ 3. NHK E. [ ―. 10.. 2012. ―. [. 2015 9.. ]. 1073pp.. 2014 8.. 358pp. pp. 239–268. ] 5. 3. NHK. 2016 ―. [ 2017. xi+570pp.. -2-. ― 175pp. ―.
(3) II. 1. 28-2 1980 2.. Vāyu. 3.. Nyāyasūtra I, i, 14. 3. pp. 680–681. 29-2 1981. 3. pp. 644–645.. 30-2 1982. 3. pp.. 930–926. Vaiśeṣikasūtra 4.1.6. 4.. (1). 14 1984. 7. 1. pp. (25)–(48). 5.. “A Study on the Textual Problems of the Padārthadharmasaṃgraha,” 4. 1 1985. pp. 106–120. ―. 6. ―. 2 1986. ―. 7.. 11. pp. 162–175.. vidhi. ― 1987. 10. pp. 139–. 154. ―. 8. 12. ―. pp. 122–136. ―. 9. 1988. 3 1987. 3. ―. pp. 140–141. ―. 10. 76 1988. 61-4. 7. ― pp. (1)–(12). ―. 11. ―. 37-2 1989. 3. pp. (75)–(79).. sukha. 12.. 62-4 1989. 3. pp. 199–200. 7. 13. 1989 14.. 3. pp. 31–46.. “What Prompts People to Follow Injunctions?: An Elucidation of the Correlative Structure of Interpretations of Vidhi and Theories of Action,” Acta Asiatica 57, 1989.9, Tokyo: The Toho Gakkai, pp. 11–30. (1). 15. 8 1990 16.. 3. pp. 25–39.. [Abstract] “The Meaning of Injunctions and the Problem of Truth in Indian Philosophy of Language,” Transactions of the International Conference of Orientalists in Japan 35, 1990.5, pp. 137–138.. -3-.
(4) bhāvanā. 17.. 39-2 1991. 3. pp. (101)–(105). (2). 18. 9 1991. 3. pp. 47–60. ―. 19. ―. 3 1991. 10. pp. 82–108.. 20. 1991 21.. 10. pp. 487–500.. “The ‘Son of Buddha’ in Saddharmapuṇḍarīkasūtra,” Index to the Saddharmapuṇḍarīkasutra: Sanskrit, Tibetan, Chinese, fascicle XI, 1993.10, Gleanings 3, pp. 2–4.. 22.. Jayanta Bhaṭṭa. 11 1996. 10. pp. (1)–(20). 23.. Jayanta Bhaṭṭa 1999. 3. ―śāstrāntara. ―. 47-2. pp. (42)–(48). Jayanta Bhaṭṭa. 24.. ―“Pallava”. ― 2000. 10. pp. 445–461. 25.. “Some Remarks on Jayanta’s Writings: Is Nyāyakalikā His Authentic Work?,” The Way to Liberation: Indological Studies in Japan, vol. I, ed. S. Mayeda, Delhi: Manohar, 2000, pp. 91–106.. 26.. Jayanta Bhaţţa. Vācaspatimiśra 2001. 2. pp. 441–461. ―. 27.. ―. ― 11. ―. 2002. pp. 677–690.. 28. 2005 29.. 3. pp.24–45.. “Some Notes on the Controversies between the “ācāryāḥ” and the “vyākhyātāraḥ” in the Nyāyamañjarī,”. 30.. 54-3 2006. 3. pp. (33)–(41).. “A Point of Contact between Philosophy and Religion in India: The Meaning of mahājanaparigraha in Jayanta’s Justification of the Vedas,” Nyāya-Vasiṣṭha: Felicitation Volume of Prof. V. N. Jha, 2006, pp. 388–400. upanaya. 31. ―. ― 53-2 2007 ―. 32. COE. -4-. 3. pp. (82)–(90). ―. 21.
(5) 2006 33.. 2007. 7. pp. 112–142.. “On the Authorship of the Nyāyakalikā again,”. 56-3 2008. 3. pp. (27)–(35). Nyāyamañjarī. 34.. ṣaṭtarkī 2010. I. 9. pp. 1–40.. prameya. 35.. artha. ―. ― 19 2012 36.. 3. pp. 19–59.. “The Meaning of a Diversity of Established World Views or Tenets (siddhānta) in the Science of Debate: with Special Reference to Jayanta’s Interpretation of the abhyupagamasiddhānta (NS 1.1.31) and Its Evaluation in the Development of Nyāya System,” World View and Theory in Indian Philosophy, ed. by P. Balcerowicz, Delhi: Manohar, 2012, Warsaw Indological Studies Series 5, pp. 407–432.. 37.. “The Structure of the Whole Discussion on śabda in the Nyāyamañjarī,” 61-3 2013.3 pp. (35)–(44). ―Syādvādaratnākara. 38.. “Pallava”. ― 2014. 3. pp. 189–204. ―. 39.. ―. ― 3. ―. 41 2015. pp.18–27 ―. 40.. 24 2016. ― 3. pp. 19–41 ―. 41.. ―. ― 3. ―. 2017. pp. 22–40.. Ⅲ. 1. 1984 2.. 39. 11. . 1986. 6. pp.. 5–6. 3. 1987. 4. .. 4.. 1988 11. pp. 84–87. -5-.
(6) 5. 1992. 10. .. 6.. 10 1994. 12. pp.. 342–344. 7.. 11. 1996. 7. pp. 389–. 403. 8. 1997. 4. .. 9. 1998 ―. 10. 11. .. 3. ―. .. 1998. pp. 6–17 ―. 11.. 1999. ― 8. pp. 93–106.. ―. 12.. ―. 40. 2001. 11. pp. 248–. 270. ―. 13. ― Ⅲ. 2003. 3. pp. 40–64.. ―. 14.. ―. (. ) 2003. 6. 5. pp. 22–23. 3. 15. 2004. 12. 5. pp. 1–3. ―. 16.. ―. 87. (ICANAS-37) ― 12. ―. 37 2004. pp.18–21. tansei. 17. 16 2005. 7. p. 20. ―. 18. No. 471 2005. 8. ―. pp. 5–8.. 19. 19. 2005. 9. x. + 253pp. 20.. ―. 18 -6-. Ⅰ.
(7) ―. 45. 2008. 3. pp. 543–564. 21. 29. 2010. 4. pp. 75–101. ―. 22. LIGHT 2011. 4. SYNAPSE vol. 02-. .. 23.. 2012. 5. ―. 24. ―. 17. 5. 2012. 5. ―. 1. ― (pp. 9–55) pp.51–55.. ―. 25.. ―. 7 2012. pp. 91–99.. 26. 18. 2. 2013. 2. Shaku Goshin. 27.. pp. 31–50.. English tr. and ed.: The Urugodawatte Great. Controversy, New English Translation & the Sinhala Text, Colombo: Udaya Graphics Press, 2012. 28, 2013. 3. , pp. 402–405. tansei 26 2013. 28.. 4. pp.. 30–31. ―. 29. ”. ―. 126 2013. “ 7. pp. 147–157.. 30. 62‐2 2014. 3. pp. 795–794. EMPower 9 EMP. 31. 2014. 3. pp. 4–7. ―. 32.. ―. ― 65. ―. 2014. 6. pp. 123–164.. ―. 33. ―. 73 2014. 9. pp. 1–25. 22. 34. 2015. 3. pp. i–iv. 61. 35. 2017. 8. pp. 42–61.. 36. 13. 2017. 9. pp. 366–371 pp. 390–395. -7-.
(8)
関連したドキュメント
The input specification of the process of generating db schema of one appli- cation system, supported by IIS*Case, is the union of sets of form types of a chosen application system
The only thing left to observe that (−) ∨ is a functor from the ordinary category of cartesian (respectively, cocartesian) fibrations to the ordinary category of cocartesian
The inclusion of the cell shedding mechanism leads to modification of the boundary conditions employed in the model of Ward and King (199910) and it will be
Theorem 2 If F is a compact oriented surface with boundary then the Yang- Mills measure of a skein corresponding to a blackboard framed colored link can be computed using formula
Keywords: continuous time random walk, Brownian motion, collision time, skew Young tableaux, tandem queue.. AMS 2000 Subject Classification: Primary:
Kilbas; Conditions of the existence of a classical solution of a Cauchy type problem for the diffusion equation with the Riemann-Liouville partial derivative, Differential Equations,
Then it follows immediately from a suitable version of “Hensel’s Lemma” [cf., e.g., the argument of [4], Lemma 2.1] that S may be obtained, as the notation suggests, as the m A
Our method of proof can also be used to recover the rational homotopy of L K(2) S 0 as well as the chromatic splitting conjecture at primes p > 3 [16]; we only need to use the
