• 検索結果がありません。

WITH SOME PARAMETERS

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

シェア "WITH SOME PARAMETERS"

Copied!
11
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

WITH SOME PARAMETERS

HONG YONG

Received 19 April 2006; Revised 30 May 2006; Accepted 5 June 2006

By introducing some parameters and norm xα(xRn), we give multiple Hardy- Hilbert integral inequalities, and prove that their constant factors are the best possible when parameters satisfy appropriate conditions.

Copyright © 2006 Hong Yong. This is an open access article distributed under the Cre- ative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Introduction

Ifp >1, 1/ p+ 1/q=1, f 0,g0, 0<0fp(x)dx <+, 0<0gq(x)dx <+, then we have the well-known Hardy-Hilbert inequality (see [4]):

+

0

f(x)g(x)

x+y dx d y < π sin(π/ p)

+

0 fp(x)dx

1/ p+ 0 gq(x)dx

1/q

, (1.1)

where the constant factorπ/sin(π/ p) is the best possible. Its equivalent form is +

0

+ 0

f(x) x+ydx

p

d y <

π sin(π/ p)

p+

0 fp(x)dx, (1.2)

where the constant factor [π/sin(π/ p)]pis also the best possible.

Hardy-Hilbert inequalities are important in analysis and in their applications (see [7]).

In recent years, many results (see [1,3,8–10]) have been obtained in the research of Hardy-Hilbert inequality. At present, because of the requirement of higher-dimensional harmonic analysis and higher-dimensional operator theory, multiple Hardy-Hilbert in- tegral inequalities are researched (see [5, 6, 11]). Yang [11] obtains the following: if αR, n2, pi>1 (i=1, 2,. . .,n), ni=1(1/ pi)=1, λ > nmin1in{pi}, fi0, and

Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Inequalities and Applications Volume 2006, Article ID 94960, Pages1–11 DOI 10.1155/JIA/2006/94960

(2)

0<α+(tα)n1λfipi(t)dt <+, (i=1, 2,. . .,n), then +

α ···

+

α

1

ni=1xiλ n i=1

fi xi

dx1. . . dxn

< 1 Γ(λ)

n i=1

Γ1nλ pi

+

α (tα)n1λfipi(t)dt 1/ pi

,

(1.3)

where the constant factor (1/Γ(λ))ni=1Γ(1(nλ)/ pi) is the best possible.

In this paper, by introducing some parameters and normxα(xRn), we give mul- tiple Hardy-Hilbert integral inequalities, and discuss the problem of the best constant factor. For this reason, we introduce the notation

Rn+=

x= x1,. . .,xn:x1,. . .,xn>0, xα= xα1+···+xnα1/α, (α >0),

(1.4)

and we agree onxα< crepresenting{xRn+:xα< c}. 2. Some lemmas

Lemma 2.1 (see [2]). Ifpi>0,ai>0,αi>0, (i=1, 2,. . .,n),Ψ(u) is a measurable function, then

···

x1,...,xn>0; (x1/a1)α1+···+(xn/an)αn1Ψx1

a1

α1

+···+ xn

an

αn

×x1p11. . . xnpn1dx1. . . dxn

= a1p1. . . apnnΓ p11

. . .Γ pnn α1. . . αnΓ p11+···+pnn1

0Ψ(u)up11+···+pnn1du,

(2.1)

where theΓ(·) isΓ-function.

Lemma 2.2. IfnZ+,α >0,β >0,λ >0,mR, 0< nm < βλ, and setting weight func- tionωα,β,λ(m,n,y) as

ωα,β,λ(m,n,y)=

Rn+

1

xβα+yβαλxαmdx, (2.2)

(3)

then

ωα,β,λ(m,n,y)= ynαβλm Γn(1/α) βαn1Γ(n/α)B

nm

β ,λnm β

, (2.3)

where theB(·,·) isβ-function.

Proof. ByLemma 2.1, we have

ωα,β,λ(m,n,y)=

Rn+

1

xβα+yβαλxαmd y

= lim

r+

···

x1,...,xn>0;xα1+···+xαn<rα

×

r x1/rα+···+ xn/rα1/αm

rβ x1/rα+···+ xn/rαβ/α+yβαλx111. . . xn11dx1. . . dxn

= lim

r+

rnΓn(1/α) αnΓ(n/α)

1 0

ru1/αm

yβα+rβuβ/αλun/α1du

= Γn(1/α) αn1Γ(n/α) lim

r+

r

0

1

yβα+tβλtnm1dt

= Γn(1/α) αn1Γ(n/α)

+ 0

1

yβα+tβλtnm1dt

= ynαβλm Γn(1/α) βαn1Γ(n/α)

1 0

1

(1 +u)λu(nm)/β1du

= ynαβλm Γn(1/α) βαn1Γ(n/α)B

nm

βnm β

.

(2.4)

Hence (2.3) is valid.

3. Main results

Theorem 3.1. If p >1, 1/ p+ 1/q=1,nZ+,α >0,β >0,λ >0,aR,bR, 0< n ap < βλ, 0< nbq < βλ, f 0,g0, and

0<

Rn+

x(nαβλ)+p(ba)fp(x)dx <+, (3.1) 0<

Rn+

y(nαβλ)+q(ab)gq(y)d y <+, (3.2)

(4)

then

Rn+

f(x)g(y)

xβα+yβαλdx d y

< Cα,β,λ(a,b,p,q)×

R+n

x(nαβλ)+p(ba)fp(x)dx 1/ p

Rn+

y(nαβλ)+q(ab)gq(y)d y 1/q

, (3.3)

Rn+

y((nα βλ)+q(ab))/(1q)

Rn+

f(x) xβα+yβαλdx

p

d y

< Cα,β,λp (a,b,p,q)×

Rn+

x(nαβλ)+p(ba)fp(x)dx,

(3.4)

whereCα,β,λ(a,b,p,q)=n(1/α)/βαn1Γ(n/α))B1/ p((nap)/β,λ(nap)/β)B1/q((n bq)/β,λ(nbq)/β).

Proof. By H ¨older’s inequality, we have

G:=

Rn+

f(x)g(y)

xβα+yβαλdx d y

=

Rn+

f(x) xβα+yβαλ/ p

xbα yaα

g(y) xβα+yβαλ/q

yaα xbα

dx d y

Rn+

fp(x) xβα+yβαλ

xbpα

yapα

dx d y 1/ p

×

Rn+

gq(y) xβα+yβαλ

yaqα

xbqα

dx d y 1/q

, (3.5) according to the condition of taking equality in H ¨older’s inequality, if this inequality takes the form of an equality, then there exist constantsC1 andC2, such that they are not all zero, and

C1fp(x) xβα+yβαλ

xbpα

yapα = C2gq(y) xβα+yβαλ

yaqα

xbqα

, a.e. (x,y)Rn+×Rn+. (3.6)

Without losing generality, we suppose thatC1=0, we may get xb(p+q)α fp(x)=C2

C1ya(p+q)α gq(y), a.e. (x,y)Rn+×Rn+, (3.7) hence, we obtain

xb(p+q)α fp(x)=C(constant), a.e.xRn+, (3.8)

(5)

hence, we have

Rn+

x(nαβλ)+p(ba)fp(x)dx=

Rn+

x(nαβλ)bqap+b(p+q)fp(x)dx

=C

Rn+

x(nαβλ)bqapdx= ∞,

(3.9)

which contradicts (3.1). Hence, and byLemma 2.2, we obtain G <

Rn+

Rn+

1 xβα+yβαλ

1 yapα

d y

xbpα fp(x)dx 1/ p

×

Rn+

Rn+

1 xβα+yβαλ

1 xbqα

dx

yaqα gq(y)d y 1/q

=

Rn+

ωα,β,λ,(ap,n,x)xbpα fp(x)dx 1/ p

Rn+

ωα,β,λ,(bq,n,y)yaqα gq(y)d y 1/q

=

Γn(1/α) βαn1Γ(n/α)B

nap

βnap β

Rn+

x(nαβλ)+p(ba)fp(x)dx 1/ p

×

Γn(1/α) βαn1Γ(n/α)B

nbq

βnbq β

Rn+

y(nαβλ)+q(ab)gq(y)d y 1/q

=Cα,β,λ,(a,b,p,q)

Rn+

x(nαβλ)+p(ba)fp(x)dx 1/ p

×

Rn+

y(nαβλ)+q(ab)gq(y)d y 1/q

. (3.10) Hence, (3.3) is valid.

Letk=((nβλ) +q(ab))/(1q), for 0< h < l <+, setting

gh,l(y)=

ykα

Rn+

f(x) xβα+yβαλdx

p/q

, h <yα< l,

0, 0<yαhoryαl,

g(y)= ykα

Rn+

f(x) xβα+yβαλdx

p/q

, yRn+,

(3.11)

by (3.1), for sufficiently smallh >0 and sufficiently largel >0, we have 0<

h<yα<ly(nαβλ)+q(ab)gh,lq (y)d y <+. (3.12)

(6)

Hence, by (3.3), we have

h<yα<ly(nαβλ)+q(ab)gq(y)d y

=

h<yα<lyk(1α q)gq(y)d y=

h<yα<lykα

Rn+

f(x) xβα+xβαλdx

p

d y

=

h<yα<lykα

Rn+

f(x) xβα+yβαλdx

p/q

Rn+

f(x) xβα+yβαλdx

d y

=

Rn+

f(x)gh,l(y)

xβα+yβαλdx d y < Cα,β,λ,(a,b,p,q)

Rn+

x(nαβλ)+p(ba)fp(x)dx 1/ p

×

R+n

y(nαβλ)+q(ab)gh,lq(y)d y 1/q

=Cα,β,λ,(a,b,p,q)

Rn+

x(nαβλ)+p(ba)fp(x)dx 1/ p

×

h<yα<ly(nαβλ)+q(ab)gq(y)d y 1/q

,

(3.13) it follows that

h<yα<ly(nαβλ)+q(ab)gq(y)d y < Cα,β,λ,p (a,b,p,q)

Rn+

x(nαβλ)+p(ba)fp(x)dx. (3.14) Forh0+,l+, we obtain

0<

Rn+

y(nαβλ)+q(ab)gq(y)d y

Cα,β,λ,p (a,b,p,q)

Rn+

x(nαβλ)+p(ba)fp(x)dx <+,

(3.15)

hence, by (3.3), we obtain

Rn+

y((nα βλ)+q(ab))/(1q)

Rn+

f(x) xβα+yβαλdx

p

d y

=

Rn+

f(x)g(y)

xβα+yβαλdx d y < Cα,β,λ,(a,b,p,q)

Rn+

x(nαβλ)+p(ba)fp(x)dx 1/ p

×

Rn+

y(nαβλ)+q(ab)gq(y)d y 1/q

=Cα,β,λ,(a,b,p,q)

Rn+

x(αnβλ)+p(ba)fp(x)dx 1/ p

×

Rn+

y((nα βλ)+q(ab))/(1q)

Rn+

f(x) xβα+yβαλdx

p

d y 1/q

.

(3.16)

Hence, we can obtain (3.4).

(7)

Remark 3.2. If f andgdo not satisfy (3.1) and (3.2), by the proof ofTheorem 3.1, we can obtain

Rn+

f(x)g(y)

xβα+yβαλdx d y

Cα,β,λ(a,b,p,q)×

Rn+

x(αnβλ)+p(ba)fp(x)dx 1/ p

Rn+

y(nαβλ)+q(ab)gq(y)d y 1/q

, (3.17)

Rn+

y((nα βλ)+q(ab))/(1q)

Rn+

f(x) xβα+yβαλdx

p

d y

Cα,β,λp (a,b,p,q)×

Rn+

x(nαβλ)+p(ba)fp(x)dx.

(3.18)

Remark 3.3. By (3.4), we can also obtain (3.3), hence (3.4) and (3.3) are equivalent.

Theorem 3.4. If p >1, 1/ p+ 1/q=1,nZ+,α >0,β >0,λ >0,aR,bR, 0< n ap < βλ,ap+bq=2nβλ, f 0,g0, and

0<

Rn+

xb(p+q)α nfp(x)dx <+, 0<

Rn+

ya(p+q)α ngq(y)d y <+,

(3.19)

then

Rn+

f(x)g(y)

xβα+yβαλdx d y

< Γn(1/α) βαn1Γ(n/α)B

nap

βnap β

×

Rn+

xb(p+q)α nfp(x)dx 1/ p

Rn+

ya(p+q)α ngq(y)d y 1/q

,

(3.20)

Rn+

y(a(p+q)α n)/(1q)

Rn+

f(x) xβα+yβαλdx

p

d y

<

Γn(1/α) βαn1Γ(n/α)B

nap

βnap β

p

Rn+

xb(p+q)α nfp(x)dx,

(3.21)

where the constant factors (Γn(1/α)/βαn1Γ(n/α))B((nap)/β,λ(nap)/β) and [(Γn(1/α)/βαn1Γ(n/α))B((nap)/β,λ(nap)/β)]pare all the best possible.

Proof. Sinceap+bq=2nβλ, we have

nbq=n(2nβλap)=βλ(nap), (3.22)

(8)

hence, by 0< nap < βλ, we obtain 0< nbq < βλ, and

(nβλ) +p(ba)=b(p+q)n, (nβλ) +q(ab)=a(p+q)n, nap

β =λnbq

β , λnap

β =

nbq

β . (3.23)

ByTheorem 3.1, (3.20) and (3.21) are valid.

If the constant factor K1:=n(1/α)/βαn1Γ(n/α))B((nap)/β,λ(nap)/β) in (3.20) is not the best possible, then there exists a positive constant K < K1, such that (3.20) is still valid when we replaceK1byK.

In particular, for 0< ε < q(nap), we take

fε(x)= xαbqε/ p, gε(y)= yαapε/q, (3.24) by (3.17) and the properties of limit, whenδ >0 is sufficiently small, we have

xα

Rn+

fε(x)gε(y) xβα+yβαλdx d y

K

xαxb(p+q)α nfεp(x)dx 1/ p

yαya(p+q)α ngεq(y)d y 1/q

=K

xαxαnε1/ p

yαyαnεd y 1/q

=K

xαxαnεdx.

(3.25)

On the other hand, byLemma 2.2, we have

xα

Rn+

fε(x)gε(y) xβα+yβαλdx d y

=

xαxαbqε/ p

Rn+

1

xβα+yβαλyαapε/qd y dx

=

xαxαbqε/ pωα,β,λ

ap+ε q,n,x

dx

= Γn(1/α) βαn1Γ(n/α)B

1 β

napε q

1 β

napε q

xαxαnεdx.

(3.26) Hence, we obtain

Γn(1/α) βαn1Γ(n/α)B

1 β

napε q

1 β

napε q

K, (3.27)

forε0+, we have

K1= Γn(1/α) βαn1Γ(n/α)B

nap

βnap β

K, (3.28)

(9)

which contradicts the fact thatK < K1. Hence the constant factor in (3.20) is the best possible.

Since (3.21) and (3.20) are equivalent, the constant factor in (3.21) is also the best

possible.

4. Some corollaries

Corollary 4.1. Ifp >1, 1/ p+ 1/q=1,nZ+,α >0,β >0,λ >0, f 0,g0, and 0<

Rn+

x(nαβλ)(p1)fp(x)dx <+, 0<

Rn+

y(nαβλ)(q1)gq(y)d y <+,

(4.1)

then

Rn+

f(x)g(y)

xβα+yβαλdx d y

< Γn(1/α) βαn1Γ(n/α)B

λ p,λ

q

Rn+

x(nαβλ)(p1)fp(x)dx 1/ p

Rn+

y(nαβλ)(q1)gq(y)d y 1/q

,

Rn+

yβλαn

Rn+

f(x) xβα+yβαλdx

p

d y

<

Γn(1/α) βαn1Γ(n/α)B

λ p,λ

q p

Rn+

x(nαβλ)(p1)fp(x)dx,

(4.2) where the constant factors in (4.2) are all the best possible.

Proof. If we takea=n/ pβλ/ p2,b=n/qβλ/q2inTheorem 3.4, (4.2) can be obtained.

Remark 4.2. If we taken=λ=1 in (4.2), we can obtain the results of [10]:

+ 0

f(x)g(y) xβ+yβ dx d y

< π βsin(π/ p)

+

0 x(p1)(1β)fp(x)dx

1/ p+

0 y(q1)(1β)gq(y)d y 1/q

, +

0 yβ1 +

0

f(x) xβ+yβdx

p

d y <

π βsin(π/ p)

p+

0 x(p1)(1β)fp(x)dx,

(4.3)

where the constant factors in (4.3) are all the best possible.

参照

関連したドキュメント

This paper gives a new multiple extension of Hilbert’s integral inequality with a best constant factor, by introducing a parameter λ and the Γ function.. Some particular results

By introducing some parameters and the β function and improving the weight func- tion, we obtain a generalization of Hilbert’s integral inequality with the best constant factor.. As

This paper deals with some extensions of Hardy-Hilbert’s inequality with the best constant factors by introducing two parameters λ and α and using the Beta functionJ. The

By introducing a parameter λ , we have given generalization of Hilbert’s type in- tegral inequality with a best possible constant factor.. Also its equivalent form is considered,

Yang, “On best extensions of Hardy-Hilbert’s inequality with two parameters,” Journal of Inequalities in Pure and Applied Mathematics, vol. Zhong, “A Hilbert-type linear operator

By introducing a parameter λ , we have given generalization of Hilbert’s type integral inequality with a best possible constant factor.. Also its equivalent form is considered, and

By introducing multiparameters and conjugate exponents and using Hadamard’s inequality and the way of real analysis, we estimate the weight coefficients and give a multiple more

Abstract: In this paper, by using the way of weight function and real analysis techniques, a new integral inequality with some parameters and a best constant factor is given, which is