• 検索結果がありません。

IR Documents|Information for Investors|Leopalace21 Corporation en daiichi ppt

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

シェア "IR Documents|Information for Investors|Leopalace21 Corporation en daiichi ppt"

Copied!
68
0
0

読み込み中.... (全文を見る)

全文

(1)

Investor Meeting Presentation

for the Three Months ended June 30, 2015

Leopalace21 Corporation

This document and reference materials may contain forward-looking statements, but please understand that actual results may differ significantly from these forecasts due to various factors.

(2)

-1-1. About Leopalace21

1-1 Business Model 4

1-2-1 Results Trend 5

1-2-2 Highlights of Results Trend 6

2. FY16/3 Q1 Results

2-1 Highlights of Results 8

2-2-1 Summary of Results (Sales & Gross Profit) 9 2-2-2 Summary of Results (Operating Profit & Net Income) 10 2-3 Results of Business Segments 11

3. FY16/3 Q1 Overview of Business (Leasing)

3-1 Overview of Leasing Business 13

3-2 Main Indicators 14

3-3-1 Indicator(Occupancy Rate) 15 3-3-2 Indicator(Occupancy by Group) 16 3-3-3 Indicator(Shares of Occupied Units by Group) 17 3-3-4 Indicator(Occupied Units by Industry) 18 3-3-5 Indicator(Foreign Tenants) 19 3-4-1 Acquiring Individual Tenants (Office Expansion) 20 3-4-2 Acquiring Individual Tenants (Room-Customize) 21 3-4-3 Acquiring Individual Tenants (Tenant Services) 22 3-4-4 Enhancing Property Value(Security Systems) 23

Contents

4. FY16/3 Q1 Overview of Business (Construction)

4-1 Overview of Construction Business 25

4-2 Main Indicators 26

4-3-1 Indicator(Orders and Sales) 27 4-3-2 Indicator(Offices and Apartment Completion by Area) 28 4-4-1 Example(Ideal Land Usage) 29

4-4-2 Example(New Brand) 30

4-4-3 Example(High-quality Apartments) 31 4-4-4 Example(Non-sound System) 32 4-4-5 Example(Elderly Care Facilities and Stores) 33 4-4-6 Example(Built-to-order homes) 34

5. FY16/3 Q1 Overview of Business (Others and New)

5-1 Others (Elderly Care Business) 36 5-2 Others (Domestic Hotels Business) 37

5-3 Others (Resort Business) 38

(3)

-2-Contents (cont.)

Appendix 1. Corporate Data

App.1-1 Corporate Profile 45

App.1-2-1 Quarter Comparison 46

App.1-2-2 Results of Leopalace21 Group 47 App.1-3-1 Indicator (Occupancy by Group) 48 App.1-3-2 Indicator (Foreign Tenants) 49 App.1-3-3 Indicator (Occupancy Rates by Building Age) 50 App.1-3-4 Indicator (Contract Type) 51 App.1-3-5 Indicator (Partners Offices and Contracts) 52 App.1-3-6 Indicator (Reserve for Apartment Vacancy Loss) 53 App.1-3-7 Indicator (“Azumi En” Area Disposition) 54 App.1-4-1 Finance (Balance Sheets) 55 App.1-4-2 Finance (Cash / Deposits and Interest-bearing Debt) 56

App.1-4-3 Finance (Cash Flows) 57

App.1-4-4 Finance (Shareholder Composition) 58

Appendix 2. Medium-Term Management Plan “EXPANDING VALUE” App.2-1 Business and Financial Strategies 60

App.2-2 Numerical Targets 61

App.2-3 Dividend Policy 62

Appendix 3. Market Trends

App.3-1 New Housing Starts 64

App.3-2 New Housing Starts (Leased Units) 65

App.3-3 Number of Households 66

(4)
(5)

-4-1-1

Business Model

Leopalace21 is a real estate company with two core businesses: a Construction Business which constructs apartments mainly for single persons, and a Leasing Business which manages these apartments. By strengthening the profitability of the Leasing Business, we are moving forward to establish a stock-based business model capable of generating stable profits.

Business model

1. Construction

Propose construction of apartments to land owners. 2. Master lease

Leopalace21 master leases the constructed apartments and pays a fixed rent to owners, regardless of vacancies. 3. Rent

Leopalace21 attracts tenants for leased apartments. 4. Rental income

Rent received from tenants.

⇒ Prior to the Lehman Collapse (2008), apartment construction

increased supported by rising occupancy demand from the booming secondary industry, especially in rural areas. Growth was led by the Construction Business.

⇒ After the Lehman Collapse, corporations laid off personnel,

and tenant leave increased in cities near corporate factories, deteriorating Leopalace21’s earnings.

⇒ Leopalace21 is shifting to a “Leasing Business-based”

business model, limiting apartment construction to areas of high occupancy demand and cutting leasing costs, as well as implementing property value enhancement measures such as installation of security systems.

Owners

Leopalace21

Leasing Construction

Tenants

2. Master Lease

1.

Construction 4.

Rental Income

(6)

277.1 302.7 334.5 342.3 356.6

380.3 383.5 388.7 399.3 411.0

316.1 327.5

359.1

237.0

107.8 62.9 53.3 63.1 61.3 86.0

38.3 42.7

39.5

40.9

19.9 16.2

17.2 19.1 22.5

28.0 631.6 672.9

733.2

620.3

484.3

459.4 454.2 471.0 483.1

525.0 76.0 71.4 50.1 -29.7 -23.6 4.5 7.4 13.6 14.7 19.5 -20 0 20 40 60 80 -200 0 200 400 600 800 FY07/3 (Actual) FY08/3 (Actual) FY09/3 (Actual) FY10/3 (Actual) FY11/3 (Actual) FY12/3 (Actual) FY13/3 (Actual) FY14/3 (Actual) FY15/3 (Actual) FY16/3 (Plan) Leasing Construction Others Operating profit

1-2-1

Results Trend

-5-Sales (Billion yen) Operating profit (Billion yen)

Results Trend

(7)

*Figures for managed units are as of the end of the final month for each fiscal year *Occupancy rate is the average value for each fiscal year

1-2-2

Highlights of Results Trend

-6-Highlights of Results Trend

Before the Lehman Collapse in 2008, Leopalace21’s main profit driver was the Construction Business. After the Lehman Collapse, we shifted our business model through structural reforms, generating profit from the Leasing Business.

(Billion yen) FY07/3 FY08/3 FY09/3 FY10/3 FY11/3 FY12/3 FY13/3 FY14/3 FY15/3 FY16/3 Plan

Net sales 631.6 672.9 733.2 620.3 484.3 459.4 454.2 471.0 483.1 525.0

Leasing 277.1 302.7 334.5 342.3 356.6 380.3 383.5 388.7 399.3 411.0

Construction 316.1 327.5 359.1 237.0 107.8 62.9 53.3 63.1 61.3 86.0

Operating profit 76.0 71.4 50.1 -29.7 -23.6 4.5 7.4 13.6 14.7 19.5

Leasing 7.0 3.0 -1.5 -47.8 -30.0 5.2 8.6 15.5 20.5 21.5

Construction 74.6 73.2 70.1 29.7 11.9 4.3 2.7 2.9 0.2 3.5

Net income 37.3 0.3 9.9 -79.0 -40.8 1.5 13.3 15.2 14.5 16.0

Managed units*

(1,000 units) 38.8 442 506 551 571 556 546 549 554 564

Occupancy rate* 92.8% 92.4% 88.5% 82.3% 80.1% 81.2% 82.9% 84.6% 86.6% 88.0%

(8)
(9)

-8-2-1

Highlights of Results

(Million yen) FY15/3 Q1

Actual

FY16/3 Q1 Plan

FY16/3 Q1 Actual

FY16/3 Full-year Plan

YoY Compared

to Plan

Sales

115,626

121,100

124,524

+8,898

+3,424

525,000

Gross profit

17,051

19,700

20,558

+3,507

+858

88,500

% 14.7% 16.3% 16.5% +1.8p +0.2p 16.9%

SGAE

14,657

16,700

16,337

+1,680

-363

69,000

Operating profit

2,394

3,000

4,221

+1,826

+1,221

19,500

% 2.1% 2.5% 3.4% +1.3p +0.9p 3.7%

Recurring profit

2,175

2,600

3,918

+1,742

+1,318

18,000

% 1.9% 2.1% 3.1% +1.2p +1.0p 3.4%

Net income

2,048

2,000

3,303

+1,255

+1,303

16,000

Highlights of Results

Construction completions were ahead of schedule, which contributed to results exceeding the plan.

(10)

-9-2-2-1

Summary of Results

(Sales and Gross Profit)

FY15/3 FY16/3 FY15/3 FY16/3

Sales

+3.4 billion yen

compared to plan

Leasing

+1.0 billion yen

Construction

+2.4 billion yen

Gross profit

+0.8 billion yen

compared to plan

Leasing

+0.1 billion yen

Construction

+0.6 billion yen

(Billion yen) (Billion yen)

Q1 Actual 17.0 FY Actual 75.7 Q1 Plan 19.7 Q1 Actual 20.5 FY Plan 88.5 0 20 40 60 80 100

Sales

Gross Profit

(11)

-10-2-2-2

Summary of Results

(Operating Profit and Net Income)

Net income

+1.3 billion yen

compared to plan

Operating profit

+1.2 billion yen

compared to plan

Leasing

+0.5 billion yen

Construction

+0.5 billion yen

Operating Profit

Net Income

(Billion yen) (Billion yen)

FY15/3 FY16/3 FY15/3 FY16/3

Q1 Actual 2.3 FY Actual 14.7 Q1 Plan 3.0 Q1 Actual 4.2 FY Plan 19.5 0 5 10 15 20 25 Q1 Actual 2.0 FY Actual 14.5 Q1 Plan 2.0 Q1 Actual 3.3 FY Plan 16.0 0 5 10 15 20

(12)

-11-2-3

Results of Business Segments

Results of Business Segments

(Million yen) FY15/3 Q1

Actual FY16/3 Q1 Plan FY16/3 Q1 Actual FY16/3 Full-year Plan YoY Compared to Plan L e a s in g

Sales 98,530 101,000 102,008 +3,478 +1,008 411,000

Gross profit 14,267 16,000 16,191 +1,924 +191 66,000

Operating profit 4,090 5,000 5,544 +1,454 +544 21,500

C o n s t-ru c tio n

Sales 11,457 13,000 15,423 +3,966 +2,423 86,000

Gross profit 2,232 3,000 3,699 +1,466 +699 20,000

Operating profit -882 -1,000 -463 +418 +537 3,500

E ld e rly C a re

Sales 2,599 2,600 2,677 +78 +77 11,200

Gross profit 129 0 9 -120 +9 0

Operating profit -132 -300 -277 -145 +23 -1,400

H o te ls & R e s o rt

Sales 2,386 3,400 3,159 +773 -241 12,500

Gross profit 1,150 1,400 1,279 +128 -121 4,200

Operating profit 196 200 96 -99 -104 -500

O

th

e

rs

Sales 652 1,100 1,254 +602 +154 4,300

Gross profit 470 500 714 +243 +214 1,700

Operating profit 158 200 286 +128 +86 -100

Adjust-ments Operating profit -1,036 -1,100 -965 +70 +135 -3,500

(13)
(14)

-13-3-1

Overview of Leasing Business

 Indicator

 Occupancy Rate

 Occupancy by Group

 Shares of Occupied Units by Groups

 Occupied Units by Industry

 Foreign Tenants  Measures

 Office Expansion (for individuals)

 Room Customize (for individuals)

 Tenant Services (for individuals)

 Security Systems (enhancing property value) Owners

Leopalace21

Leasing Construction

Tenants

Master Lease Rental

Income Rent

Leasing Business

(15)

-14-3-2

Main Indicators (Leasing)

Main Indicators (Leasing)

(Million yen) FY13/3

Actual

FY14/3 Actual

FY15/3 Actual

FY16/3 Plan

Sales

383,574

388,768

399,316

411,000

Gross profit

43,510

54,187

62,763

66,000

Operating profit

8,687

15,567

20,532

21,500

Units under management

(as of the end of FY)

546,204

548,912

554,948

564,000

Occupancy rate (average)

82.94%

84.58%

86.57%

88.00%

Direct offices

(as of the end of FY)

182

184

188

187*

Number of corporate sales

section(as of the end of FY)

46

49

59

48*

Number of employees

(non-consolidated, as of the end of FY)

2,661

2,829

2,989

3,140*

of which, sales employees

1,374

1,512

1,526

1,605*

(16)

-15-Occupancy Rate

Apr May Jun Q1

Avg. Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Avg.

FY13/3 81.77 82.18 82.69 82.21 82.53 82.90 83.13 82.59 82.55 82.29 83.39 84.48 84.81 82.94

FY14/3 83.32 83.67 83.69 83.56 83.50 83.84 84.28 84.23 84.31 84.12 85.61 86.92 87.47 84.58

FY15/3 86.00 86.03 85.96 86.00 85.63 85.78 86.33 86.14 86.10 85.69 87.24 88.65 89.29 86.57

FY16/3 87.88 87.61 87.59 87.70 87.32 87.60

3-3-1

Indicator (Occupancy Rate)

Achievement of long-term occupancy and stable rates due to increase in long-term contracts. Average occupancy rate during April to June trended +1.7p year-on-year.

Target average occupancy rate for FY16/3: 88.0%

(Occupancy rate = Occupied units / Managed units, %) 80%

82% 84% 86% 88% 90%

Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

(17)

200 300 400 500 600

0 50 100 150 200 250 300

Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun

FY09/3 FY10/3 FY11/3 FY12/3 FY13/3 FY14/3 FY15/3 FY

16/3

Managed units (right axis)

Occupied units (right axis)

70% 80% 90% 100%

-16-Corporate tenants are steadily rising, but increasing the number of individual and student tenants still remains an issue. 1. Promote services attending occupant needs, 2. established “Educational Institution Sales Division” in October 2014.

3-3-2

Indicator (Occupancy by Group)

Occupancy rate

Occupied units by Group (Thousand units)

Managed and occupied units (Thousand units)

Occupancy rate Individuals (left axis)

Corporate (left axis)

Students (left axis)

*Figures are as of the end of each month *Reference of p.48

(18)

-17-Both occupied units and shares of corporate tenants are steadily increasing due to reinforcement of corporate sales.

3-3-3

Indicator (Shares of Occupied Units by Groups)

*Figures are as of the end of each quarter *Reference of p.48

Shares of Occupied Units by Groups

(Thousand units)

43.2% 44.1% 45.2% 47.3% 47.3% 47.4% 47.7%49.4% 49.5% 49.5% 49.4% 51.3% 51.5% 51.4% 51.1% 53.0% 53.3% 42.2% 41.6% 40.3% 38.8%39.3% 39.4% 38.9% 38.0% 38.2% 38.3% 38.3%

37.3% 37.4% 37.4% 37.6% 36.8% 36.8%

14.6% 14.3% 14.5% 13.9% 13.4% 13.3% 13.4% 12.6% 12.3% 12.2% 12.3% 11.4% 11.1% 11.1% 11.3% 10.2% 9.9%

462 464 452 464 460 458 450 463 458 461 461 480 473 476 474 495 488

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

FY12/3 FY13/3 FY14/3 FY15/3 FY16/3

(19)

42,586 45,227 46,488 24,602 28,976 31,795

29,358 31,786 34,437 36,733 38,015 39,408 14,461 14,792 16,510 34,114 39,017 43,605 44,620 45,775 47,680 226,474 243,588 259,923

2013/6 2014/6 2015/6 43,942 43,472 46,277 47,510

24,632 24,570 29,105 32,022

28,869 30,218 32,995

35,169

35,601 37,380 39,188

40,878 13,445 14,710 14,956 16,635 32,223 35,096 39,783 44,398 40,527 43,262 43,968 45,965 219,239 228,708 246,272 262,577 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 300,000

2012/3 2013/3 2014/3 2015/3

-18-3-3-4

Indicator (Shares of Occupied Units by Industry)

Shares of Occupied Units by Industry

Leopalace21 will pursue strategies of “expanding major business connections” and “cultivating ‘low-use’ business connections” while diversifying industry types of corporate tenants. Approximately 79.4% (+0.1p compared to the previous fiscal year-end) of listed companies* in Japan use Leopalace21.

*Companies listed on the 1stand 2ndsections of the Tokyo Stock Exchange, regional stock exchanges, and emerging markets

(Units) Other Construction Food service Services Staffing, outsourcing Manufacturing Retail

YoY +4.3% +7.7% +6.6% YoY +7.6% +6.7%

(20)

-19-3-3-5

Indicator (Foreign Tenants)

Leased Units by Foreign Nationals (Excluding Corporate Contracts)

*Reference of p.49 (Units)

Foreign students are able to make lease contracts through our “LAM (Leopalace Alliance Members) school.” In addition to the openings of overseas offices, we are strengthening our support system for foreign customers after coming to Japan, such as distribution of our service guide, providing customer services via call centers, and holding group gatherings. Foreign customers make up 2.8% of total contracts (5.9% of individual and student contracts). Foreign nationals comprised of students 57% and working-class 43%.

Philippines Overseas

subsidiary Manila

Myanmar 1 office Yangon

Cambodia Overseas

subsidiary Phnom Penh

Thailand Overseas

subsidiary Bangkok

Vietnam Overseas

subsidiary Ho Chi Minh, Ha Noi

Taiwan 1 office Taipei

South

Korea 2 offices Busan, Seoul* China Overseas

subsidiary

Beijing, Dalian, Shanghai, Guangzhou

* Seoul Gangnam and Seoul Jongno unified to Seoul in April 2015

* Operations started in the Philippines (overseas subsidiary) in July 2017

0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 16,000 J u n S e p D e c M a r J u n S e p D e c M a r J u n S e p D e c M a r J u n S e p D e c M a r J u n S e p D e c M a r J u n

FY11/3 FY12/3 FY13/3 FY14/3 FY15/3 FY

16/3

China S. Korea Taiwan

Vietnam Thailand Other Southeast Asia

(21)

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400

Jun SepDec Mar Jun SepDec Mar Jun SepDec Mar Jun SepDec Mar Jun SepDec Mar Jun

FY11/3 FY12/3 FY13/3 FY14/3 FY15/3 FY 16/3 (Offices)

Direct Partners

-20-Leopalace21 will recruit tenants through direct offices including 7 overseas and franchise partners. Concerning Leopalace Partners, we will aim for “quality over quantity” and increase contracts through training. 2 direct offices opened during FY14/3 and 4 direct offices opened during FY15/3.

3-4-1

Acquiring Individual Tenants (Office Expansion)

Leasing Offices

*Reference of p.52

Direct offices 187 (-1)

of which, domestic 180 (±0)

of which, overseas 7 (-1)

Partners (franchise) 135 (-6)

Total offices 322 (-7)

As of June 30, 2015 (Figures in parentheses represent comparison to March 2015)

* Overseas locations operating foreign real estate brokerage services not included.

(22)

-21-3-4-2

Acquiring Individual Tenants (Room-Customize)

 Custom wallpaper for free on 1 wall. Thumbtacks, shelves, and scribbling on the wall is OK

 No cost for restoring room to original state

 More than 100 types of wallpaper to choose from, including patterns

 Male-to-female ratio of 50:50, higher percentage of females compared to overall occupancy (70:30)

“Room-Customize”

In May 2012, Leopalace21 has started “Room-Customize” as a strategy for acquiring individual tenants. 22,250 contracts have been acquired as of June 30, 2015, and we will continue to promote the image of “Customize = Leopalace.”

Contracts (Cumulative total)

(# of contracts)

Contests

Room-Customize Contest

Occupants enter their room-customizing ideas

Wall-art Contest

Winners paint their work on the walls of our showroom

“Nagoya-like Rooms”

Students compete in creating rooms which best represent “Nagoya”

22,250

0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000

Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun Sep Dec Mar Jun FY13/3 FY14/3 FY15/3 FY

(23)

-22-3-4-3

Acquiring Individual Tenants (Tenant Services)

Services such as the “concierge service,” which satisfy tenants’ demands upon request, overturn common practices of the leasing apartment industry. Services are available through “MY PAGE,” an exclusive website for our tenants.

MY PAGE matches up the needs of individual and corporate occupants. Individuals are able to use services at a discount price, while

corporations recruit personnel.

Website for Tenants: “MY PAGE”

Tie-up with Corporate Clients

LEONET (Wireless LAN)

Use the web without the hassle of contracting with internet providers. Movies and shows are also available.

Wireless LAN services started as of April 2014.

Commity space for land owners, occupants, students, and corporate clients.

Events held in Osaka, Sendai, and Shinjuku.

Community space “L+”

Individual occupants

Corporate clients

Discount services

Recruit personnel

Leopalace Center Shinjuku Hotel Leopalace Sendai

Leopalace Online Shopping

Shopping web site with many everyday-necessities. Products made specially for Leopalace are also available.

L-Club Off

(24)

FY15/3 Q1 Actual

FY16/3 Q1 Actual

Cumulative total

Orders

Units 11,260 8,113 256,609

Billion yen 2.31 1.66 43.65

Sales

Units 8,625 8,170 234,971

Billion yen 1.89 1.72 41.44 Security system

-23-3-4-4

Enhancing Property Value (Security Systems)

Orders and Sales of Security Systems

Security systems have been installed in 234,971 rooms as of June 30, 2015, equivalent to 42.2% of Leopalace21 apartments. Security cameras have been installed on 6,002 buildings, equivalent to 17.0%.

 Business alliances with two major security companies  The standard equipment includes fire sensing

systems and emergency systems, in addition to sensors that detect intruders

 We anticipate an increase in the percentage of female tenants

 We are seeking to meet demand for security in corporate housing

(Large companies emphasize security)

Problem detected

Call subscriber, alert emergency services if necessary 3. Dispatch 2. Assign

dispatch Control

Center Emergency

response

personnel dispatched

(25)
(26)

-25-4-1

Overview of Construction Business

Owners

Leopalace 21

Leasing Construction

Tenants

Master Lease Rental

Income Rent

Construction Business

 Indicators

 Orders and Sales

 Offices and Sales by Area  Construction Examples

 Ideal Land Usage

 New Brand

 High-quality Apartments

 Non-sound System

 Elderly Care Facilities and Stores

(27)

-26-4-2

Main Indicators (Construction)

Main Indicators (Construction)

(Million yen) FY13/3

Actual

FY14/3 Actual

FY15/3 Actual

FY16/3 Plan

Sales

53,369

63,135

61,312

86,000

Gross profit

13,197

14,972

13,223

20,000

Operating profit

2,747

2,954

210

3,500

Orders

73,006

81,139

87,395

99,000

of which, apartments and

other buildings

55,174

67,446

84,679

99,000

of which, solar power

systems

17,831

13,693

2,715

0

Offices

(as of the and of FY)

52

54

60

62*

Number of employees

(non-consolidated, as of the end of FY)

1,374

1,506

1,638

1,821*

of which, sales personnel

256

363

418

518*

(28)

18.1 18.1 20.7 19.2 24.2

14.7 21.7 15.3 20.5

5.9

0.6 0.0 3.5

1.0

2.4

0.9

1.7

0.1

0 10 20 30

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4

(Billion yen)

Apartments, etc. (including Morizou)

Solar power systems (excluding those generated by Leopalace21 Group)

-27-4-3-1

Indicator (Orders and Sales)

Gross Orders

(Billion yen)

FY14/3 FY15/3 FY16/3

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Full-year Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Full-year Q1 Full-year

Plan

Gross orders received

(Buildings*) 230 237 195 195 857 223 277 237 229 966 214 1,050 (Billion yen) 24.0 22.7 17.1 17.1 81.1 18.7 25.2 22.7 20.6 87.3 20.7 99.0

Orders outstanding

(Billion yen) 50.0 52.8 56.9 44.4 44.4 46.7 57.3 64.9 58.1 58.1 66.8

Sales

(Billion yen) 13.8 16.4 10.3 22.3 63.0 11.4 13.1 13.0 23.5 61.1 15.3 86.0

Construction orders for Q1 of FY16/3 trending +10.6% compared to last year. Starting this fiscal year, orders (0.5 billion yen) and sales (0.7 billion yen) from built-to-order homes of our subsidiary Morizou Co., Ltd. are included.

*Built-to-order homes of Morizou and solar power systems installed on existing apartments are not included in “Gross orders received (buildings)”

Orders and Sales (Including Solar Power Systems and Morizou Co., Ltd.)

(29)

Tokyo Metropolitan 85 Chubu 16 Kyushu, Okinawa 16 Tohoku 15 Kinki 13 Chugoku 9 Other 5

-28-4-3-2

Indicator (Offices and Apartment Completion by Area)

Total 62 offices

(As of June 2015)

Tokyo metropolitan: 39 offices Tohoku: 3 offices (Sendai, Kohriyama) Chubu: 4 offices (Aichi) Kinki: 8 offices Chugoku: 2 offices

(Okayama, Hiroshima) Kyushu, Okinawa: 5 offices (Fukuoka, Okinawa) Shikoku: 0 offices Hokuriku, Koshinetsu: 0 offices Hokkaido: 0 offices North Kanto: 1 office (Mito) Osaka 5 offices

Kyoto 1 office Hyogo 2 offices

Tokyo 20 offices Kanagawa 8 offices Saitama 8 offices Chiba 3 offices

Construction Offices

Apartment Completion (FY16/3 Q1)

(Buildings)

 Tokyo metropolitan area makes up 53.5%, and the three metropolitan areas (Tokyo, Kinki, and Chubu) make up 71.7% of apartment buildings built.

Leopalace21 will continue to place offices and operate in areas where high occupancy rates can be expected, specifically in the three metropolitan areas (Tokyo, Kinki, and Chubu).

(30)

-29-4-4-1

Example (Ideal Land Usage)

Elderly care facilities

Apartments

Matching business

between land owners and care facility operators,

addressing the increasing number

of seniors. Products addressing

needs of tenants. Apartments are bulk-leased and managed by Leopalace21.

Built-to-order homes

Stores

Construction of convenience stores, restaurances, and complex buildings with apartments on road-sides and near stations.

Construction of built-to-order homes and house with rooms for rent, in which rent income can be earned.

Leopalace21 proposes the optimal plan fit for the unique conditions of each land.

Proposals including mega-solar power plants and parking lots.

Others

Lang usage

proposions of

Leopalace21

(31)

4-4-2

Example (New Brand)

-30-“MIRANDA”

“CLEINO”

New apartment brands “MIRANDA” and “CLEINO” announced in May 2015. While maintaining basic installments such as security systems and the industry’s top class sound-insulation, the launch of two unique brands will strengthen competitiveness and renew brand image.

 Concept is “plain.”

 A “plain-type” apartment brand that fits and matches to each occupant’s needs and lifestyle.

 Concept is “decorative.”

(32)

-31-4-4-3

Example (High-quality Apartments)

Announced in October 2013, “Arma-L tri-EL” is an apartment which integrates the characteristics of our two main products

“DUAL-L” and “Arma-L.” Also, we have announced “L-SECtion,” with installments improving the comfortability of the first floor.

 Space is utilized effectively by a “bunk-bed”

(multifunctional bed) which unifies a bed and storage.  Improved security and privacy by blocking the line of

sight from the outside with 1.7m “high-position balcony.”  Exclusive area 25-31 m2

 Three lofts of “DUAL-L” create a luxurious space equivalent to 1LDK

 Like the “Arma-L” which was designed to address the needs of female tenants, a dresser is placed in the living space, as well as wall storage and counter-type kitchen.

Addressing Female Needs: “Arma-L tri-EL”

Improving First Floor Comfortability: “L-SECtion”

High-position balcony

(33)

-32-4-4-4

Example (“Non-sound System”)

From April 2013, Leopalace21 apartments are standardly equipped with sound-insulating “non-sound system,” including noise reduction walls, soundproof drains, and “non-sound floors” which reduce noise levels by two ranks compared to conventional wooden structures.

Upgraded Sound Insulation with “Non-sound System”

Sound-insulating

drainpipes

Installed as a measure against drainage noise. Decreases noise by 15 dB compared to conventional models, providing

environments similar to “libraries or midnight suburbs.”

Non-sound floor

Reduces noise from upper floors. Insulation improved two to three ranks compared to conventional models.

Sound-insulating

walls

Improved sound-insulation quality of walls, providing TLD-45 for wooden structures and TLD-50 for steel frame structures.

Down

15dB

Construction example Cross section Wooden

TLD-45

Wooden structures

Steel

TLD-50

Steel frame structures Wooden

V-model

Down

1/3

Wooden structures V-model (option)

Steel

Down

1/3

Steel frame structures

(34)

-33-FY15/3 Q1 Actual

FY16/3 Q1 Actual

Elderly care facilities

Orders

Buildings 3 4

Billion yen 1.09 1.13

Sales

Buildings 9 3

Billion yen 0.95 0.32

Stores

Orders

Buildings 5 2

Billion yen 0.14 0.19

Sales

Buildings 5 1

Billion yen 0.20 0.01

Elderly care facilities (Setagaya-ku, Tokyo)

Stores

(Osaka City, Osaka)

4-4-5

Example (Elderly Care Facilities and Stores)

Orders and Sales of Elderly Care Facilities and Stores

(35)

4-4-6

Example (Built-to-order homes)

-34-Luxury custom-built “Taiga”

 Free design house built with top quality kiso-hinoki wood

 In addition to the durability of kiso-hinoki wood, ventilation systems prevent deterioration  Strong earthquake protection by placing structural control dampers in a balanced manner

Morizou Co., Ltd., a custom-home builder specializing in luxurious homes made with kiso-hinoki wood, has been subsidized as of March 2015.

(36)
(37)

-36-5-1

Others (Elderly Care Business)

Elderly Care Business

Elderly Care Business is positioned as a growth strategy area, planning to open 29 facilities in three years to a total of 90. 2 facilities opened during FY15/3 and 5 facilities will open during FY16/3. Occupancy rate of day-services decreased due to the start of operations on Sundays when we used to be closed.

(Million yen) FY15/3 Q1

Actual

FY16/3 Q1 Plan

FY16/3 Q1 Actual

FY16/3

Full-year Plan

YoY Compared

to Plan

E

ld

e

rly

C

a

re

Sales 2,599 2,600 2,677 +78 +77 11,200

Gross profit 129 0 9 -120 +9 0

Operating profit -132 -300 -277 -145 +23 -1,400

Occupancy rate (Day-service) 73.4% 70.0% 67.3% -6.1p -2.7p 71.7%

Occupancy rate (Short-stay) 96.7% 96.1% 94.5% -2.2p -1.6p 96.3%

Occupancy rate

(Private residential homes, etc.) 94.4% 93.0% 93.1% -1.3p +0.1p 93.7%

(38)

-37-5-2

Others (Domestic Hotels Business)

Domestic Hotels Business

Occupancy rates improved due to increase in usage by client companies of the leasing business. *Hotel Leopalace Yokkaichi (August 2014) and Hotel Leopalace Niigata (July 2015) sold.

Hotel Leopalace Sendai

Hotel Leopalace Sapporo

Hotel Leopalace Hakata

(Million yen) FY15/3 Q1

Actual

FY16/3 Q1 Plan

FY16/3 Q1 Actual

FY16/3 Full-year Plan

YoY Compared

to Plan

D

o

m

e

s

tic

H

o

te

ls

Sales 562 520 561 -1 +41 1,900

Operating profit -21 -40 -4 +17 +36 -100

Depreciation and amortization 84 73 75 -8 +5 200

Occupancy rate 76.4% 76.7% 77.5% +1.1p +0.8p 81.1%

(39)

Although tourists visiting Guam have not increased year-on-year, an increase in usage by leasing business tenants has

increased both occupancy rates and earnings. Usage by soldiers coming to Guam on exercises started from the end of August 2014.

-38-Resort Business (Leopalace Guam)

5-3

Others (Resort Business)

*Non-consolidated figures for Leopalace Guam *Q1 of Leopalace Guam is from January to March

Westin Resort Guam

Leopalace Resort Leopalace Resort Country Club

(Thousand U.S. dollars) FY2014/12

Q1 Actual

FY2015/12 Q1 Plan

FY2015/12 Q1 Actual

FY2015/12 Full-year

Plan

YoY Compared

to Plan

L

e

o

p

a

la

c

e

G

u

a

m

Sales $24,718 $26,400 $25,998 +$1,280 -$402 $88,200

Operating profit 5,331 4,100 3,343 -1,988 -757 2,400

Depreciation and amortization 3,555 3,600 3,619 +64 +19 14,600

Occupancy rate (Leopalace Resort) 85.3% 70.1% 70.8% -14.5p +0.7p 59.7%

(40)

0 5,000 10,000 15,000

FY14/3 Q1

Q2 Q3 Q4 FY15/3

Q1

Q2 Q3 Q4 FY16/3

Q1 FY12/3 Q2 FY12/3 Q4 FY13/3 Q2 FY13/3 Q4 FY14/3 Q2 FY14/3 Q4 FY15/3 Q2

Owner-invested Roof-lease (SPC) Roof-lease (Leopalace21 Group)

-39-*2.b.”Installments by Leopalace21 Group” are eliminated on a consolidated basis. (Reference of p.41)

-39-5-4-1

Others (Solar Power Systems)

Solar power installments started in March 2011. Solar power systems were installed on 12,771 buildings as of June 2015 (about 58% of buildings that can be installed).

Installments by Schemes

Schemes Start FY15/3 FY16/3 Q1

1. Solar power systems installed with apartment

owners’ burden Mar 2011 7,129 (89.1MW) 7,17589.9MW

2. Roof-lease solar power systems Sep 2012 5,227 (83.3MW) 5,59688.9MW

a. SPC and other tie-up installments Feb 2013 1,258 (24.6MW) 1,25624.5MW

b. Installents by Leopalace21 Group

* Dec 2013 3,969

(58.7MW) 4,34064.4MW

3.

Mega-solar power plants utilizing idle land Sep 2013 Tomisato,

Chiba (1.7MW)

Tomisato,

Chiba1.7MW

Total: 12,356 (172.4MW) 12,771178.8MW

(41)

-40-5-4-2

Others (Solar Power Systems by Area)

Solar Power System Installations by Area

(as of June 30, 2015)

(Buildings)

Solar power systems are not installed in snowy areas (Hokkaido and Tohoku), areas with volcanic ashes (Kagoshima), and areas on the seashore with risk of salt damage. A third of installments are in the Tokyo metropolitan area , where Leopalace21 apartments are abundant.

Total: 12,771

1,161 413

936

1,601

2,416 262

4,333 1,197

452

0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000

Kyushu, Okinawa Shikoku Chugoku Kinki Chubu Hokuriku, Koshinetsu Tokyo-metro North Kanto Tohoku

Owner-invested

(42)

-41-5-4-3

Others (Roof-lease Solar Power Systems)

Roof-lease Solar Power Systems by Leopalace21 Group

FY14/3 Actual

FY15/3 Actual

FY16/3 Q1

Actual Cumulative total

Buildings installed

1,114

2,855

371

4,340

Generating capacity

21.4 MW

37.2 MW

5.7 MW

64.4 MW

Buildings which started

generation

680

3,102

522

4,304

Sales from selling generated

power (Billion yen)

0.10

1.46

0.84

2.41

Generated power

2,700 MWh

36,600 MWh

22,000 MWh

61,000 MWh

* Includes Fukushima Pilot Project (67 buildings, 1.2 MW)

* Sales from selling generated power is included in “Other Businesses” * Generated power corresponds to each period

¥14.6 billion of the funds raised through public offering (¥24.6 billion) used for installments of roof-lease solar power systems. In addition, roof-lease solar power business by our group company utilizing loans from banks is implemented. Total of 4,400

buildings scheduled to be installed by 1H of FY16/3.

Power Producer and Supplier Leopalace Energy

Leopalace Energy Corporation will supply the electricity generated by Leopalace Power Corporation on apartment rooftops to consumers.

In anticipation of the deregulation of electricity retail in 2016, we plan to supply electricity to our apartments.

Company Profile

Name Leopalace Energy Corporation Capital ¥20 million

(43)

Busan Dalian Beijing

Shanghai

Guangzhou

Taipei

Bangkok

Ho Chi Minh Phnom Penh Yangon

Introduce Japanese apartments

Foreign real estate brokerage

Both businesses Ha Noi

Manila Seoul

5-5-1

New Businesses (Leasing Business Overseas)

Leopalace21 will expand its leasing business overseas. In addition to introducing Japanese apartments to foreigners, we have started foreign real estate brokerage services in Southeast Asia targeting Japanese individuals and companies. Also, we have entered the Korean market through a leasing management venture with local enterprise. We have started operations in the Philippines as of July 2015, and plan to open a subsidiary in Indonesia during FY16/3.

Leasing Business Overseas

China Beijing, Dalian, Guangzhou, Shanghai South Korea Busan, Seoul*

Taiwan Taipei Thailand Bangkok

Vietnam Ho Chi Minh, Ha Noi Cambodia Phnom Penh

Myanmar Yangon Philippines Manila

Foreign offices, subsidiaries

South Korean JV “Woori & Leo PMC”

 Established with South Korea’s largest

residential property management company  Woori & Leo PMC will provide South Korea’s

first systematic leasing management services  Full-scale operations started after the local law

enactment on February 2014, with 575 managed units as of June 30, 2015

Introduce Japanese apartments to foreigners

Foreign real estate brokerage targeting Japanese

individuals and companies

Traditional

In the future

(44)

0 40 80 120 160

'09 '10 '11 '12 '13 '14 '15

5-5-2

New Businesses (Overseas Business)

-43-Service Apartments

Acceptance of Foreign Technical Intern Trainees

In addition to introducing Japanese apartments to foreigners and foreign real estate brokerage services in Southeast Asia, we have started construction of service apartment properties. Also, in response to the shortage of construction labor supply, we have begun supporting the acceptance of technical intern trainees by our partnering contractors, in cooperation with the Technical Intern Training Program (TITP).

 In cooperation with TITP, we support the acceptance of Vietnamese intern trainees by our partnering contractors  Trainees receive training in the Japanese language,

construction terminology, and practical construction skills, both in Vietnam and Japan

 18 trainees accepted in partnering contractors as of July 2015

 Service apartments for employees of Japanese companies sent overseas

 First project in Cambodia (construction completion: January 2017; operation start: April 2017)

 We are planning to construct service apartments in Vietnam and Myanmar, where there are similar demands

Exterior image (Cambodia) Showroom visits

Construction terminology training Practical construction training

18 Vietnamese technical intern trainees

Official Members of the Japanese Business Association of Cambodia*

(45)
(46)

Individuals and Other 16.73%

Business Corporations and Other Legal Entities

2.51% Foreign Corporations 50.65% Financial Institutions 25.01% Financial Instruments Business Operations (Securities Companies) 3.39% Treasury Stocks 1.71%

-45-App.1-1

Corporate Profile

Corporate Data

(as of June 30, 2015)

Shareholder Composition

(as of March 31, 2015)

Group Companies

Company Name Leopalace21 Corporation

Head Office 2-54-11 Honcho, Nakano-ku, Tokyo TEL. +81-3-5350-0001 (Main Line) Established August 17, 1973

Paid-in Capital ¥75,282 million*1

President President and CEO Eisei Miyama

Operations

Construction, leasing and sales of apartments, condominiums, and residential housing; development and operation of resort facilities; hotel business; broadband business; and elderly care business, etc. Employees 7,759 (consolidated), 6,554 (non-consolidated) Authorized Shares 500,000,000

Outstanding Shares 267,443,915*1

Shareholders 39,197 (as of March 31, 2015)

*1: Increase due to public offering and private placement (overallotment)

H o te ls & R e so rt O th e r L e a si n g C o n st ru -ct io n

Woori & Leo PMC

Leasing management in South Korea

Leopalace21 (Thailand)

Real estate brokerage in Thailand Leopalace Leasing Corporate housing agent Leopalace21 Business Consulting (Shanghai) Tenant recruitment LEOPALACE21 VIETNAM

Real estate brokerage in Vietnam

Plaza Guarantee

Rent guarantee

Leopalace21 (Shanghai) Property Management

Real estate brokerage in Shanghai

Leopalace21 (Cambodia)

Real estate brokerage in Cambodia Leopalace Power Power generation Leopalace Guam Resort Business ASUKA SSI

Tenant contents insurance

Azu Life Care

Elderly care service

Leopalace Energy Power producer and supplier WING MATE Business travel management Leopalace Smile Special subsidiary Morizou Custom-built homes LEOPALACE21 PHILIPPINES INC.

(47)

-46-(Million yen)

Q1 Apr – Jun

Q2 Jul – Sep

Q3 Oct – Dec

Q4 Jan – Mar

FY15/3 Actual

FY16/3 Actual

FY15/3 Actual

FY16/3 Plan

FY15/3 Actual

FY16/3 Plan

FY15/3 Actual

FY16/3 Plan

Sales 115,626 124,524 117,411 131,900 117,718 127,000 132,432 145,000

Leasing 98,530 102,008 98,902 102,000 98,921 102,000 102,962 106,000

Construction 11,457 15,423 13,193 23,000 13,043 18,000 23,618 32,000

Elderly Care 2,599 2,677 2,676 2,700 2,702 2,900 2,629 3,000

Hotels & Resort 2,386 3,159 1,872 3,000 2,287 3,100 2,404 3,000

Others 652 1,254 766 1,200 763 1,000 817 1,000

Operating profit 2,394 4,221 3,693 5,000 3,457 3,700 5,217 7,800

Leasing 4,090 5,544 5,471 5,500 5,586 5,000 5,385 6,000

Construction -882 -463 -492 1,000 -480 0 2,065 3,500

Elderly Care -132 -277 -105 -400 -143 -300 -225 -400

Hotels & Resort 196 96 -326 -300 -529 -200 -629 -200

Others 158 286 104 0 18 0 -249 -300

App.1-2-1

Quarter Comparison

(48)

-47-App.1-2-2

Results of Leopalace21 Group

Results for Leopalace21 and Major Subsidiaries

(Million yen) FY15/3 Q1

Actual

FY16/3 Q1 Plan

FY16/3 Q1

Actual YoY Compared

to Plan

Leopalace21 Sales 116,026 118,000 121,521 +5,495 +3,521

OP 1,972 2,400 3,782 +1,809 +1,382

Leopalace Leasing Sales 394 400 489 +95 +89

OP -10 0 2 +13 +2

Plaza Guarantee Sales 867 800 834 -33 +34

OP 30 0 -63 -94 -63

Leopalace Guam Sales 2,521 3,000 3,097 +576 +97

OP 532 400 398 -133 -2

Leopalace Travel Sales 284 800 771 +486 -29

OP -3 0 -7 -3 -7

ASUKA SSI Sales 369 400 396 +26 -4

OP 124 100 96 -27 -4

Leopalace Power Sales 239 600 801 +562 +201

OP 11 0 174 +163 +174

Others & Exclusions

Sales -5,076 -3,023 -3,388 +1,687 -365

(49)

-48-FY14/3 FY15/3 FY16/3

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

Units under management 546,856 547,161 547,978 548,912 550,514 551,545 552,966 554,948 557,017

A. Occupied units 457,683 461,136 460,961 480,110 473,197 476,163 473,862 495,487 487,900

Occupancy rate (average) 83.6% 83.9% 84.2% 86.7%

FY84.6% 86.0% 85.9% 86.0%

88.4%

FY86.6% 87.7%

B. Corporate-occupied units 226,474 228,038 227,580 246,272 243,588 244,967 242,293 262,577 259,923

Corporate share (B / A) 49.5% 49.5% 49.4% 51.3% 51.5% 51.4% 51.1% 53.0% 53.3%

C. Individual-occupied units 175,057 176,782 176,503 179,036 176,885 178,186 178,228 182,142 179,748

Individual share (C / A) 38.2% 38.3% 38.3% 37.3% 37.4% 37.4% 37.6% 36.8% 36.8%

D. Student-occupied units 56,152 56,316 56,878 54,802 52,724 53,010 53,341 50,768 48,229

Students share (D / A) 12.3% 12.2% 12.3% 11.4% 11.1% 11.1% 11.3% 10.2% 9.9%

*Occupancy rate is the average value for each period (full-year or quarter)

*Figures for units under management and occupied units are as of the end of the final month for the relevant period

App.1-3-1

Indicator (Occupancy by Group)

(50)

-49-(Units)

FY14/3 FY15/3 FY16/3

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

China 5,007 5,497 5,654 6,125 5,906 6,297 6,652 7,033 6,320

South Korea 1,441 1,415 1,384 1,298 1,272 1,293 1,325 1,336 1,322

Taiwan 621 642 651 658 613 618 659 747 706

Southeast Asia 915 1,195 1,458 1,833 2,018 2,326 2,571 2,859 2,750

of which,

Vietnam 268 499 723 1,059 1,231 1,496 1,717 1,995 1,886

of which,

Thailand 89 91 97 95 101 102 107 103 99

Others 1,651 1,769 1,845 2,013 1,993 2,133 2,213 2,391 2,388

Total 9,635 10,518 10,992 11,927 11,802 12,667 13,420 14,366 13,486

App.1-3-2

Indicator (Foreign Tenants)

Units Occupied by Foreign Tenants (Chintai

Contracts*)

*Figures are as of the end of the final month for the relevant period

(51)

93.3% 93.6%

87.7%

93.3% 92.2% 93.8% 92.0%

91.2%

97.7%

92.7%

93.0% 94.3% 91.3% 92.6% 92.9% 94.1% 92.8% 91.6% 94.4% 93.1%

91.1% 89.7% 88.9%

85.8% 89.0% 91.6% 88.6% 89.6% 86.8% 89.2%

70% 80% 90% 100%

Tokyo Saitama Kanagawa Chiba Tokyo Metro

Aichi Osaka Kyoto Hyogo 3-metro areas Under 3 years Under 5 years Total

-50-App.1-3-3

Indicator (Occupancy Rates by Building Age)

Occupancy Rates by Building Age

(as of June 30, 2015)

Occupancy Rates by Area

(as of June 30, 2015)

86.0% 96.9% 97.3% 92.5% 92.7% 89.9% 85.5% 81.4% 87.6%

0% 50% 100%

1 year 2 years 3 years Under 3 years

Under 5 years

5-10 years 10-15 years Over 15 years

(52)

-51-1. Chintai(General) Contract

• No deposit or brokerage fee

• Monthly payments

• Contracts for more than one year

2. Monthly Contract

• Equipped with basic furniture and appliances

• No utility cost • One-time payment

• Contracts starting from 30 days

App.1-3-4

Indicator (Contract Type)

Tenants by Contract Type

Same period last year

Two Types of Contracts

Due to promotion of long-term tenancies, shares of short-term “monthly contracts” have decreased.

(Thousand units) 117 (32%) 108 (26%) 107 (24%) 104 (23%) 114

(24%) (20%)94 79 (17%)

68

(14%) (12%)58 66 (14%)

57 (12%) 254 306

336 357 365 370 384 412 438 407 431 372

414

442 462

478

464 463 480

495 473 488 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

'07/3 '08/3 '09/3 '10/3 '11/3 '12/3 '13/3 '14/3 '15/3 '14/6 '15/6

(53)

-52-Partner and Direct Offices, and Contracts by -52-Partners

FY14/3 FY15/3 FY16/3

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

Partner offices 179 172 167 164 152 149 143 141 135

Direct offices (domestic) 176 176 176 176 179 179 180 180 180

Total leasing offices 355 348 343 340 331 328 323 321 315

Contracts by Partners 8,204 8,392 7,972 10,516 6,736 7,079 6,748 9,065 6,317

Leasing Offices by Area

(as of June 30, 2015)

Hokkaido Tohoku North

Kanto

Tokyo-metro

Hokuriku,

Koshinetsu Chubu Kinki Chugoku Shikoku

Kyushu, Okinawa

Partner offices 3 6 7 38 9 21 15 13 5 18

Direct offices

(domestic) 9 15 14 48 13 23 25 11 5 17

Total leasing

offices 12 21 21 86 22 44 40 24 10 35

App.1-3-5

Indicator (Partners Offices and Contracts)

(54)

-53-App.1-3-6

Indicator

(Reserve for Apartment Vacancy Loss)

Occupancy Rate

Reserve for Apartment Vacancy Loss

(Billion yen)

Reversal in the reserve for apartment vacancy loss during FY15/3 was ¥4.0 billion due to “profit improvement” and “passage of remaining periods.” (Forecast reversal for full-year was ¥3.3 billion). Forecast reversal for FY16/3 is ¥2.5 billion, and the reversal for FY16/3 Q1 was 0.3 billion yen.

FY13/3 Reversal ¥5.2 bil

(Billion yen, %)

Managed units (1,000 units)

FY15/3 FY16/3 Compared

to FY15/3 Q4 FY15/3 Q4 FY16/3 Q1 Diff.

Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1

Hokkaido 14 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 -0.05 79% 83% +3.6p

Tohoku 35 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00 94% 94% -0.6p

North Kanto 40 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.6 -0.01 85% 83% -1.8p

Tokyo-metro 159 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.6 0.5 -0.09 92% 89% -3.4p

Hokuriku, Koshinetsu 41 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.5 0.5 -0.01 84% 85% +0.5p

Chubu 87 3.2 2.9 2.4 2.0 1.9 -0.15 86% 85% -1.0p

Kinki 79 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.6 -0.04 90% 87% -2.3p

Chugoku 38 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00 91% 90% -1.5p

Shikoku 15 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.02 84% 83% -0.7p

Kyushu, Okinawa 49 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.00 91% 90% -0.8p

Total 557 8.7 7.8 6.4 5.2 4.9 -0.36 89.3% 87.6% -1.7p FY14/3 Reversal ¥4.5 bil FY15/3 Reversal ¥4.0 bil

(55)

-54-App.1-3-7

Indicator (“Azumi En” Area Disposition)

Elderly Care Facilities “Azumi En” Area Disposition

(63 as of June 30, 2015)

Sekikawa Horigome Ota Tatebayashi Hanyu Kanuma Utsunomiya Yaita Shimodate Yuki Koga Kogachuou Iwai Nogi Shinkoga Tsuchiura Kokinu Yanagisawa Showa Minamisakurai Ina Kitamoto Gyoda Higashimatsuyama Honjyo Chichibu Ome Hirasawa Tatemachi Nakano Yamakita Tsurumaki Tsukuihama Ichihara Ichihara Oyumi Katsuragi Wakaba Ino Takaoka Nakazawa Namikicho Misaki Takatsukashinden Tokiwadaira Sakasai Abiko Takamihara Komakidai Souka Irumagawa Sayama Komuro Mizuho Mihashi Goseki Hanasakinooka Ageo Yoshikawa Gamou Yashio Gunma Saitama Tokyo Kanagawa Chiba Ibaraki

Tochigi (Number of facilities)

T o kyo K a n a g a w a C h ib a S a ita m a T o ch ig i Ib a ra ki G u n m a T o ta l

Facilities which include elderly homes with nursing care services

1 1 1 2 2 7

Facilities which include

residential style elderly homes 1 5 2 3 2 1 14 Day-services and Short-stays 2 1 11 18 1 6 1 40

Group homes 1 1 2

Total 4 3 18 22 6 8 2 63

★ Elderly homes with nursing care services, Day-services, Short-stays

Elderly homes with nursing care services, Short-stays

■ Elderly homes with nursing care services, Day-services

● Elderly homes with nursing care services

★ Residential style elderly homes, Day-services, Short-stays

Residential style elderly homes, Short-stays

● Residential style elderly homes

○ Group homes

▲ Day-services, Short-stays

● Day-services

Legend

▲Kisarazu

“Azumi En Kisarazu” (the first elderly care facility managed by subsidiary “Azu Life Care”) opened on November 1, 2014 and “Azumi En Shimizukoen” opened on March 1, 2015. 5 facilities will open during the second half of FY16/3 (Not only in Kanto but also in Chubu).

(56)

-55-App.1-4-1

Finance (Balance Sheets)

(Million yen) FY15/3 FY16/3

Q1

A

sse

ts

Cash and cash equivalents 75,221 74,412

Trade receivables 6,254 5,475

Accounts receivables for completed projects 1,714 1,689

Prepaid expenses 3,656 3,384

Deferred tax assets (short-term) 4,447 4,469

Current assets 102,263 99,372

Buildings and structures 59,899 59,140 Machinery, equipment, and vehicles 15,115 16,819

Land 83,289 83,429

Leased assets 7,880 8,898

Intangible fixed assets 8,894 8,758

Long-term prepaid expenses 3,416 3,432 Deferred tax assets (long-term) 14,654 14,705

Non-current assets 205,887 207,121

Total assets 308,274 306,609

(Million yen) FY15/3 FY16/3

Q1 L ia b ilit ie s

Interest-bearing debt (short-term) 24,525 25,056

Accounts payable for completed projects 14,049 9,737

Advances received 40,781 37,748

Current liabilities 116,521 105,402 Interest-bearing debt (long-term) 11,156 18,531 Reserve for apartment vacancy loss 5,280 4,913 Lease/guarantee deposits received 8,019 7,838

Long-term advances received 22,198 20,647

Non-current liabilities 65,279 71,534

Total liabilities 181,801 176,936

N e t a s s e ts

Common stock 75,282 75,282

Capital surplus 51,501 45,235

Retained earnings 427 9,997

Total net assets 126,473 129,672

Shareholders’ equity ratio 41.0% 42.3%

Balance Sheets

(57)

46.8

31.4

35.6

31.4

43.5 56.6

74.7 75.2

64.9

74.4

-0.17

-0.41

-0.31 -0.31 -0.24

-0.60 -0.40 -0.20 0.00 0.20 0.40

0 20 40 60 80

FY13/3 FY14/3 FY15/3 FY15/3 Q1 FY16/3 Q1

(Ratio) (Billion yen)

Interest-bearing debt Cash Net DE ratio

-56-App.1-4-2

Finance (Cash / Deposits and Interest-bearing Debt)

NDE Ratio

*Net DE ratio = (Interest-bearing debt – Cash) / Shareholders’ equity

Long-term debt increased due to roof-lease solar power system installments (371 buildings installed during Q1).

(58)

FY15/3 Q1 FY15/3 Full year FY16/3 Q1

-57-App.1-4-3

Finance (Cash Flows)

Cash Flows

Cash outflow from investing activities is mainly due to roof-lease solar power system installments (371 buildings installed during Q1).

(Billion yen) (Billion yen)

73.6 74.5

64.2

40 60 80

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period 7.4

-2.8 -5.4

1.7

-17.5 15.7

-0.3 -3.7

-5.7

-20 -10 0 10 20

Cash flows from financing activities Cash flows from

investing activities Cash flows from

(59)

-58-App.1-4-4

Indicator (Shareholder Composition)

*Based on number of stock

Shareholder Composition

2011/3 2011/9 2012/3 2012/9 2013/3 2013/9 2014/3 2014/9 2015/3

Individuals and other 60.7% 43.3% 35.2% 33.2% 27.5% 19.8% 20.7% 17.1% 16.7%

Foreign corporations 11.3% 27.8% 35.2% 34.3% 42.8% 48.6% 49.1% 46.8% 50.7%

Trust banks 4.9% 8.4% 8.3% 11.8% 12.8% 17.5% 17.6% 23.6% 23.2%

Financial institutions other than trust banks 3.8% 3.4% 3.4% 3.3% 3.6% 2.5% 1.7% 1.9% 1.9% Business corporations and other legal entities 14.1% 13.0% 12.7% 12.3% 7.8% 7.8% 6.9% 6.6% 2.5%

Securities companies 2.6% 1.4% 2.7% 2.6% 3.5% 1.7% 2.4% 2.3% 3.4%

Treasury stock 2.6% 2.6% 2.6% 2.5% 2.1% 2.1% 1.7% 1.7% 1.7%

0% 50% 100%

(60)

Appendix 2.

Medium-term Management Plan “EXPANDING VALUE”

(61)

-60-App.2-1

Business and Financial Strategies

Business Strategies

Financial Strategies

Leasing Improve occupancy rates by expanding tenant services FY March 2017:

Annual average occupancy rate 89.0%

Construction Expand construction variations based on “ideal land usage” FY March 2017:

Forecast sales ¥100 billion

Elderly Care Open new facilities in collaboration with the Construction business March 2014: 61 facilities

⇒March 2017: 90 facilities Hotels & Resort High quality hospitality to stakeholders

Solar Power

(Other)

Start roof-lease solar power business utilizing funds raised through public offering

FY March 2015:

Installments/generation on 2,900 buildings

Overseas

(Leasing, Other)

Start real estate brokerage services in Asia

Considering development and operations of service apartments

March 2014: 10 locations

⇒March 2017: 20 locations

Basic policy: “Focus on core businesses and challenging itself with new business fields”

Management emphasizing cash flows

Strengthen soundness of financial structure

(Improve shareholders’ equity ratio)

FY March 2017: Shareholders’ equity ratio 48.0% Active reinvesting in growth areas

Resumption of dividends Achieve positive retained earnings (non-consolidated) by stacking up profits

(62)

-61-App.2-2

Numerical Targets

Medium-term Management Plan “EXPANDING VALUE” Numerical Targets

(Billion yen) FY13/3

Actual

FY14/3 Actual

FY15/3 Plan

FY16/3 Plan

FY17/3 Plan

Sales

4,542

4,710

4,831

5,250

5,400

Operating profit

74

136

147

195

220

Recurring profit

110

115

134

180

210

Net income

133

152

145

160

190

Shareholders’ equity

ratio

22.2%

36.5%

41.0%

45.0%

48.0%

ROE

29.0%

18.7%

12.5%

12.0%

12.3%

EPS (yen)

74.5

67.2

55.2

60.9

71.7

ROA

5.1%

5.5%

4.9%

5.5%

6.0%

Average occupancy

(63)

-62-App.2-3

Dividend Policy

(Billion yen)

Retained earnings (non-consolidated) as of FY15/3 was -6.2 billion yen, but in order to prepare for the resumption of dividends, a “reduction of legal capital surplus and appropriation of surplus” has been resolved at the ordinary meeting of shareholders held in June 2015.

(64)
(65)

1,343 1,420

1,5101,5611,485 1,630

1,341

1,1801,226 1,2131,173 1,146 1,1741,193

1,2491,285

1,036 1,039

775 819

841 893 987

880

0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 1,600 1,800

91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

(Thousand units)

Leased units Condominiums House for sale Owner-occupied houses Company housing

-64-App.3-1

New Housing Starts

New Housing Starts by Fiscal Year (April to March)

After the Lehman collapse, new housing starts have been on an increasing trend. Due to last minute demand from consumption tax increase, new housing starts in FY2013 has increased 10.5% yoy, however decrease is seen in FY2014 (decreased 10.8% yoy). However, leased units

decreased 3.1% yoy, therefore negative effects from the rush demand with the consumption tax increase is limited.

*Excerpted from “Housing Start Statistics” (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport)

YoY

-3.1% -21.1%

-7.2%

-11.0% +49.2%

(66)

178 186 149

117 126 128 114 102 80 80 97 104 108 113 123 128 112 117 60 39 31 31 36 48 582

687 652

574 564 616

516

444 426 418 442 455 459 467

518 538

431 445

311

292 290321

370 358

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800

91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14

Leased units under 30㎡ Leased units over 30㎡

-65-App.3-2

New Housing Starts (Leased Units)

New Housing Starts of Leased Units by Fiscal Year (April to March)

Leased units starts in FY2013 increased 15.3% yoy, following an increase for the first time in four years in the previous fiscal year. It decreased 3.1% yoy, of which leased units over 30㎡ decreased -7.1% yoy, but leased units under 30㎡ increased

+32.9%.

*Excerpted from “Housing Start Statistics” (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport) (Thousand units)

+32.9% -7.1%

参照

関連したドキュメント

Aldehydes with electron-withdrawing substituent, p-cyanobenz- aldehyde, and triethylborane reacted smoothly (Table 4, entry 1), while other aldehydes tried reacted slower (Table

著者 Komura Ryotaro, Libhold Andrew, Esaki Kojiro, Igeta Yutaka, Muramoto Ken‑ichiro, Kamata

【Details of the study】Surveys were conducted for a wide range of interviewees, including doctors, Japanese students, foreign students studying abroad in Japan, stakeholders of

The goods and/or their replicas, the technology and/or software found in this catalog are subject to complementary export regulations by Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Law

Working memory capacity related to reading: Measurement with the Japanese version of reading span test Mariko Osaka Department of Psychology, Osaka University of Foreign

Projection of Differential Algebras and Elimination As was indicated in 5.23, Proposition 5.22 ensures that if we know how to resolve simple basic objects, then a sequence of

Infinitesimal actions of quadratic forms is computed in Weyl ordering and normal ordering, and these define involutive distributions on the space of exponential functions.. We

In order to facilitate information exchange, Japan Customs improved rules for information provision to foreign customs administrations based on the tariff reform in March 1998